About the Research
This project explores hydrofoil technology, highlighting its impact on maritime transport by enhancing speed and efficiency. From pioneering work to modern applications in racing yachts and fast ferries, hydrofoils have shown transformative potential. However, ventilation inception poses risks to performance and safety.
This project addresses the unpredictable nature of ventilation onset in surface-piercing hydrofoils during initial design stages using RANS-VOF CFD simulations. The limitations of current CFD methods in predicting ventilation conditions necessitate further investigation to improve hydrofoil design reliability. The research objectives focus on evaluating RANS-VOF’s capabilities and limitations in predicting ventilation, identifying critical conditions, and developing recommendations to enhance simulation reliability. The project structure addresses the research question through a theoretical framework, computational simulations, and data analysis, aiming to advance design methodologies and ensure safer, more efficient maritime transport solutions.
Identifying the Critical Conditions of Ventilation inception
The theoretical framework analyzes the critical factors influencing ventilation inception on hydrofoils, emphasizing the importance of understanding and predicting this phenomenon to enhance hydrofoil efficiency and safety.
Ventilation occurs due to air cavities forming around the hydrofoil’s lifting surfaces when local pressure drops below atmospheric levels. This can be triggered by high speeds, high angles of attack, and proximity to the free surface, which create low-pressure zones conducive to air ingress, influencing pressure distribution and flow characteristics. Various experiments have identified critical conditions for ventilation onset, such as specific ranges of speed, angle of attack, and Froude numbers. For instance, experiments by by Wetzel [77] and Barden and Binns [5] have shown that higher speeds and angles of attack increase the likelihood of ventilation.
The framework also provided guidelines for recognizing different flow regimes around hydrofoils:
• Fully Wetted Flow: Complete submersion with stable lift and drag forces.
• Partially Ventilated Flow: Mixed surfaces with variable cavity lengths and flow separation.
• Fully Ventilated Flow: Stable cavity enveloping the suction surface with visible spray and tip vortices.
The review of experimental studies synthesizes findings on parameters influencing ventilation. The selection of the NACA 0010-34 profile dataset for numerical simulations was based on a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). A detailed list of requirements for evaluating the fidelity of numerical simulations in predicting ventilation dynamics was established. These requirements guided the research
phases, ensuring accurate replication of experimental conditions and reliable predictions. It was concluded that all requirements for the evaluation of the numerical simulation’s fidelity are met.
Designing and Conducting Numerical Experiments
This methodology outlines an approach to designing and conducting numerical experiments on hydrofoil ventilation inception. The Design of Experiments (DOE) method was chosen for its effictive and systematic approach, enabling a thorough understanding with minimal tests, crucial for achieving research objectives and recommended for future studies.
The numerical experiment set-up was carfully planned, tailoring the DOE method to this research. The goal was to use Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to replicate the hydrofoil’s geometry and compare numerical results with experimental towing test data, aiming to identify discrepancies and improve CFD accuracy. Independent variables, factor levels, and response metrics were systematically organized for a structured experimental design. Case selection was based on thorough experimental data analysis, ensuring comprehensive variable space coverage. An iterative approach ensured testing of the most critical conditions.
Reproducing experiments with CFD involved detailed pre-processing, processing, and post-processing steps. Using ReFRESCO as the CFD solver ensured accurate hydrodynamic performance simulation. Comparative analysis of different numerical methodologies highlighted the impact of various set-up choices. Post-processing with ParaView and JupyterLab Python scripts facilitated visualization and analysis of complex data, allowing extraction of key hydrodynamic performance metrics, providing a clear understanding of the foil’s hydrodynamic behavior.
In summary, this methodology provides a robust framework for conducting numerical experiments on hydrofoil ventilation inception. The systematic approach ensures research objectives are met, contributing to more accurate and reliable CFD simulations for maritime applications.
Comparing CFD Set-Ups
The results analyze different methods for predicting ventilation inception on hydrofoils, examining free surface and wave elevation, hydrodynamic forces, flow regime characteristics, and comparing CFD setups. Significant differences were found between Method 1 and Method 2, especially in mesh resolution and the ability to simulate vortices. Method 1, with its finer mesh and higher-order discretization, provided more accurate results. Numerical artifacts, like water patches, indicated the need for contact line correction.
Hydrodynamic forces analysis using the Transient Scanning Technique (TST) showed Method 1 produced more consistent results over longer computation times, while Method 2 had irregularities. Decomposing lift and drag forces into coefficients (CL and CD) allowed for a generalized comparison. High-speed flows were less sensitive to simulation settings, while low-speed flows were more affected by mesh
resolution, turbulence modeling, and numerical schemes. The characteristic check of flow regimes confirmedthatbothmethodsmetthecriteria for fully wetted flow regimes. However, for fully ventilated flow regimes, Method 1 succeeded in simulating ventilation, while Method 2 did not, highlighting the limitations of RANS-VOF in predicting complex flow phenomena associated with ventilation inception.
The Outcomes
While providing valuable insights the industry-standard RANS-VOF method falls short in accurately predicting the complex flow phenomena of ventilation inception. Undermining the reliability of the predictions necessary for effective modeling thechallenge lies not in the turbulencemodelingcapabilities of RANSbutinthe VOFmethod’s inability to accurately represent the water-air interface. RANS, which
averages the Navier-Stokes equations, captures the overall effect of turbulence without resolving all small-scale turbulent structures, making it suitable for general turbulence modeling. However, the VOF method lacks the precision needed to represent abrupt transitions at the fluid interface.
The comparative analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each method. Method 1 excels in accuracy and precision, suitable for detailed hydrodynamic analyses but is computationally intensive. Method 2 is cost-effective and efficient for early design stages, providing quick estimates with reduced computational demands, though less accurate especially for low-speed flows.
A hybrid approach (Concept 3) is recommended, combining Method 2 for initial assessments and Method 1 for detailed analysis. This approach can enhance results by addressing boundary condition artifacts, wave damping, and adaptive grid refinements. The choice between Concepts 1, 2, and 3 depends on the specific needs of the hydrodynamic analysis:
• Concept 1: Method 1for high precision and reliability, despite higher computational demands and longer computation times.
• Concept 2: Method 2 for quick, efficient preliminary assessments, balancing accuracy and computational efficiency.
• Concept 3: Ahybrid approach, using Method 2 for initial assessments and Method 1 for detailed analysis, optimizing both accuracy and efficiency, providing a balanced solution for hydrodynamic performance prediction.