No, Small Probabilities are Not 'Attractive to Sell': A Comment

If you want to read the PDF, try requesting it from the authors.


Owing to the convexity of the payoff of out-of-the money options, an extremely small probability of a large deviation unseen in past data justifies rationally buying them, or at least justifies excessive caution in not being exposed to them, particularly those options that are extremely nonlinear in response to market movement or changes in implied volatility. One needs, for instance, a minimum of 2000 years of stock market data to assert that some tail options are "expensive." The paper presents errors in Ilmanen (2012), which provides an exhaustive list of all arguments in favor of selling insurance on small probability events. The paper goes beyond Ilmanen (2012) and suggests an approach to analyze the payoff and risks of options based on the nonlinearities in the tails.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... This result translates to a non-unified approach towards games in general and debriefing in particular. The complexity characterising modern systems, as it was examined in Section 2, immediately excludes pure analytical methods as the absolute and only solution, as the probability for ludic fallacy (Taleb, 2004) increases significantly. Therefore, these interviews aimed to provide insights on how facilitation experts approach debriefing, and to tap into their tacit knowledge. ...
Full-text available
Gaming simulations (games) for policy and decision making have been the neglected "sibling" of educational and training games. The latter have experienced a widespread usage by practitioners and researchers, while the former have had limited , yet slowly increasing, adoption by organisations. As a result, various issues developing and using these games remain unaddressed. This includes the design of games, their validation, the actual game sessions, and applying the resulting knowledge from games in organisations. In this paper, solutions for issues identified in these four areas of gaming simulations are proposed. Solutions vary from purely analytical to purely social, stressing the interdisciplinary approach required to tackle the issues associated with them. The result consists of several theoretical and practical contributions as well as philosophical considerations regarding games for policy and decision making.
... What remains is the fact that AIG learned the lesson about letting rates rise if there is "a specially large demand" for insurance in order to protect the book from the danger of being upset the hard way. As Taleb (2013) points out, it does not matter that the probability of losses is small. ...
We review the work of Soros on reflexivity and follow up his claim that it can be used to attack the efficient market hypothesis. Both are discussed and then the ideas of Soros are compared to those of Post-Keynesian economics. We argue that Soros’ book is mainly ignored by neo-classical economists because they disagree with his axioms, and by heterodox economists because his ideas are not new.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.