International Criminal Procedure: 'Adversarial', 'Inquisitorial' or Mixed?

International Criminal Law Review 12/2011; 3(1). DOI: 10.1163/156753603767877084
Source: OAI


The article analyses whether international criminal procedure is “adversarial”, “inquisitorial” or mixed. It examines the law of the ICTY and the ICC, including the relevant case law. This law has developed from an adversarial to a truly mixed procedure by way of various amendments of the ICTY’s Rules of Procedure and Evidence (RPE) and the drafting of the Rome Statute merging civil and common law elements in one international procedure. It is no longer important whether a rule is either “adversarial” or “inquisitorial” but whether it assists the Tribunals in accomplishing their tasks and whether it complies with fundamental fair trial standards. As to an efficient trial management an UN Expert Group called for a more active role of the judges, in particular with regard to the direction of the trial and the collection of evidence. In this context, it is submitted that a civil law like judge-led procedure may better avoid delays produced by the free interplay of the parties. Ultimately, however, the smooth functioning of a judicial system depends on its actors, procedural rules provide only a general framework in this regard. A truly mixed procedure requires Prosecutors, Defense Counsel and Judges who have knowledge of both common and civil law and are able to look beyond their own legal systems.

Full-text preview

Available from: SSRN
  • Source

    Preview · Article ·
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This special issue of Recht der Werkelijkheid is dedicated to the topic of exploring legal cultures. As the case studies nicely illustrate, law and culture relate to each other in a variety of ways in different national and international settings. How judges in South Africa incorporate community values into the legal system and how unquestioned cultural assumptions play a significant role in judicial reasoning in cases with litigant parties from cultural minorities in the Netherlands, are examples of culture in law. The next two chapters have in common a focus on the relationship between a national legal culture and a globalising market economy. In Russia the traditional legal culture of the rule of man rather than law conditions the impact of institutional reforms whereas the notary profession in France is thanks to its non-aggression pact with the government coping rather well with the challenges of the common law culture of an open legal service market. The next couple of chapters offer studies of how different nation states approach similar problems. The ban on Islamic headscarves in public schools in France has no parallel in the Netherlands but a similar moral panic about national identity can be seen in a new Act that obliges in particular Muslim migrants to learn the Dutch language and society. A constitutional ethnography of six countries that experienced dictatorship reveals that each country has its own form of militant democracy, expressing and constructing at the same time a particular national legal culture. The final chapter takes the reader to the cultural dilemmas between telling the truth, doing justice, and making peace in the aftermath of the civil war in Uganda.
    Preview · Article · Jan 2007

  • No preview · Article · Jan 2011
Show more