The Tori of the Mouth and Ear: A Review

Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St George's University, Grenada, West Indies
Clinical Anatomy (Impact Factor: 1.33). 11/2013; 26(8). DOI: 10.1002/ca.22264
Source: PubMed


There is a great deal of literature regarding the tori of the mouth and ear. However, there is controversy regarding the etiology and prevalence of each. The torus palatinus is generally agreed to be the most common oral exostosis and is more frequently found in females. The torus mandibularis is also quite common, is more prevalent in males, and occurs bilaterally in 80% of cases. Far less data have been presented regarding the torus maxillaries primarily due to the lack of consensus regarding its nomenclature and classification. These oral tori are thought to be inherited in an autosomal dominant manner with a relatively high penetrance; however, environmental and functional factors have been postulated that may account for a more complex etiology than simply genetics. The torus auditivus is rarely acknowledged in clinical papers and most data are found in anthropological journals. Although there is an abundance of literature that addresses these traits individually, there is a lack of research that collectively acknowledges these. Therefore, the aim of this study was to present a composite review of the tori with regards to their anatomical features, prevalence, etiology and clinical relevance. Clin. Anat., 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

  • Source
    • "occlusion hyperstress)[11,14,15], and environmental (such as diet and use of drugs)161718factors have been discussed as possible reasons for origin and development, but none have been defined as dominant. Scholars agree on the multifactorial nature of the causes[19,20], but few have addressed such analysis in their studies[21]. However, multifactority needs to be proven by a series of investigations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The aim of the study was to verify the influence of a genetic factor on the etiology of oral bony outgrowths and to determine the prevalence and type of oral bony outgrowths (tori and exostoses) among a group of Lithuanian twins. Materials and methods: In total, 162 twins (81 twin pairs) were analyzed for the presence or absence, type, and size of oral bony outgrowths. Statistical analysis was carried out to find the prevalence of bony protuberances and the relationship between zygosity and occurrence of oral bony enlargements. Zygosity of twins was confirmed by DNA analysis. Results: 59.9% of the subjects had oral bony outgrowths. Mandibular tori were found in 56.8% and palatal tori in 1.8% of the sample. Palatal exostoses and mandibular exostoses were present in 1.8% and 3.1% of the sample, respectively, whereas maxillary exostoses were not found. A higher percentage of tori and exostoses were found in the group of older subjects (>18 years old, p = 0.025). No significant difference was found between men and women in the prevalence of bony outgrowths. High kappa and r values (0.91 +/- 0.062) showed very good concordance of oral bony outgrowths between monozygotic and moderate concordance (0.58 +/- 0.141) between dizygotic co-twins (p < 0.001). The calculation of heritability estimate verifies dominant influence of genetic factor on the etiology of oral bony outgrowths (h(2) = 0.658). Conclusion: The most common bony outgrowth was torus mandibularis. Our results show that the genetic factor is dominant in the etiology of oral bony outgrowths. (C) 2015 Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier Sp. z o.o.
    Preview · Article · Jul 2015 · Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • No preview · Article · Mar 2015 · Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Teeth are housed in mandible and maxilla and are known to undergo variations in clinical presentation depending on the degree of abnormality during growth and development. It is essential to identify these variations in normal anatomy so that appropriate treatment can be initiated to address the anomaly. Some normal anatomic variations are harmless and best left alone, whereas others require intervention. Radiology plays a vital role in identification of such anomalies. This article focuses on the diagnostic radiographic interpretation and strategies to include pertinent differential diagnosis. Also discussed is the importance of advanced imaging and its appropriateness in the diagnosis and interpretation.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2016 · Dental clinics of North America