This monograph [full in Polish language] presents the results of research on area-based partnerships (partnership groups) operating in rural areas in Poland until 2006. From the theoretical perspective, we refers primarily to the theory of exchange (including rational choice theory), which was developed e.g. in the social sciences and economy. The research objects were local, formal coalitions for local development, inspired by the Local Action Groups operating in Western Europe within the framework of the LEADER Community Initiatives. Referring to the literature, we proposed for these organizations the use of the term "territorial partnership", which means a formalized initiative of cross-sectoral cooperation for socio-economic development of given sub-region, based on the concept of endogenous development. Three main periods were distinguished in the development of territorial partnerships in Poland:
− the years 1994–1998 – in 1994 the establishment of the first over-municipal crosssectoral initiative was noted, but in general it was not followed by spontaneous creation of tri-partite organizations for local development, and in addition there was no systemic support for this type of cooperation. Possible cooperation could sometimes take place within the framework of the associations.
− the years 1999–2004 – during this period the partnerships were initiated mainly through pilot projects funded from foreign resources, most commonly re-distributed by large NGOs. Partner groups were modelled on the experience from Western Europe and the USA. There were no nationwide Polish government programmes to support organizations of that type. In that period, the local and regional NGOs played a major role in partnership creation. The undertaken projects did not have any large economic significance, but they were important for building trust between local actors involved and for popularization of the idea of cross-sectoral cooperation. About 20–30 initiatives of the "territorial partnership" type were established and at least a few dozen were at the stage of forming.
− the years 2005–2006 – during this period partnerships were commonly established under the LEADER+ Pilot Program (PPL+), which rules had a high impact on the legal and organizational form of partnerships. Owing to the programme, most of the partnerships in Poland prepared strategies and in years 2007–2008 implemented non-investment projects. The local authorities had a dominant role in the process of partnership forming in that period. In late 2006, there were over 200 such organizations, their area was mostly related to natural regions.
Local governments and voluntary organizations were most active in the investigated coalitions. Most of the partnerships had prepared a development strategy, but specific projects financed from sources other than PPL+ were implemented only by a dozen oldest organizations by 2006, mostly in the category of tourism promotion and development of small-scale tourist infrastructure. Financial and legal problems were found to be the main constraints in partnership development. Most of the partnerships had just began their activity and, with only a few positive exceptions, had not achieved significant effects by 2006, either in local economic development, or in the real mobilization of local communities. There were even cases of local authorities rejecting projects proposed by local inhabitants or trying to take control over the financial resources from PPL+.
The inhabitants knowledge about even the longest-operating partnerships was negligible in the three examined case studies (Odra Valley Partnership, Pilica Valley Partnership and Strug Valley Partnership). Difficulties arose in implementing the main ideas declared in the concept of cross-sectoral cooperation. Some of them resulted from the LEADER+ Pilot Program’s administrative constraints (for example, imposition of a legal form, the exclusion of even small urban municipalities, the exclusion of any investment projects in the scheme). Some of the limitations resulted from the problems with the development of civil society reported in the literature (such as the politicization of the local government, their conflicts with or aversion to NGOs, the lack of tradition of cooperation, the leader’s tendency to dominate partnerships, low social activity).
However, a formal network analysis of the three examined cases showed that partnerships had a great role in creating non-hierarchical, cross-sectoral links (such as coordination and co-operation), which was an important factor contributing to the creation of social capital in rural areas. Partnerships engaged in the promotion of tourism and the creation of so-called local products, which in the future may help to provide additional income to inhabitants of the villages. However, the participation of the private sector, and representatives of farmers was usually low, which was a weakness of the created organizations. In the case studies, differences between partnerships can be explained by the regional socio-cultural diversity. The analysis led to the author’s conclusion that additional measures are necessary to prevent the dominance of local authorities in partnerships, to increase social participation through the involvement of non-governmental and private sector, and to strengthen local voluntary organizations in rural areas. The results also justify the need for further comparative regional studies based on an analysis of the relationship between local actors involved in collaboration.