ArticlePDF Available

ATA Practice Guidelines for Video-Based Online Mental Health Services

Authors:

Abstract

Table of Contents PREAMBLE SCOPE INTRODUCTION Internet-Based Telemental Health Models of Care Today CLINICAL GUIDELINES A. Professional and Patient Identity and Location 1. Provider and Patient Identity Verification 2. Provider and Patient Location Documentation 3. Contact Information Verification for Professional and Patient 4. Verification of Expectations Regarding Contact Between Sessions B. Patient Appropriateness for Videoconferencing-Based Telemental Health 1. Appropriateness of Videoconferencing in Settings Where Professional Staff Are Not Immediately Available C. Informed Consent D. Physical Environment E. Communication and Collaboration with the Patient's Treatment Team F. Emergency Management 1. Education and Training 2. Jurisdictional Mental Health Involuntary Hospitalization Laws 3. Patient Safety When Providing Services in a Setting with Immediately Available Professionals 4. Patient Safety When Providing Services in a Setting Without Immediately Available Professional Staff 5. Patient Support Person and Uncooperative Patients 6. Transportation 7. Local Emergency Personnel G. Medical Issues H. Referral Resources I. Community and Cultural Competency TECHNICAL GUIDELINES A. Videoconferencing Applications B. Device Characteristics C. Connectivity D. Privacy ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES A. Qualification and Training of Professionals B. Documentation and Record Keeping C. Payment and Billing REFERENCES.
Policy
ATA Practice Guidelines for Video-Based Online Mental Health Services
Carolyn Turvey, PhD,
1
Mirean Coleman, LICSW, CT,
2
Oran Dennison, BS,
3
Kenneth Drude, PhD,
4
Mark Goldenson,
5
Phil Hirsch, PhD,
6
Robert Jueneman, BS,
7
Greg M. Kramer, JD, PhD,
8
David D. Luxton, PhD,
8
Marlene M. Maheu, PhD,
9
Tania S. Malik, JD,
10
Matt C. Mishkind, PhD,
8
Terry Rabinowitz, MD, DDS,
11,12
Lisa J. Roberts, PhD,
13
Thomas Sheeran, PhD, ME,
14,15
Jay H. Shore, MD, MPH,
16
Peter Shore, PsyD,
17
Frank van Heeswyk, PhD,
18
Brian Wregglesworth,
3
Peter Yellowlees, MBBS, MD,
19
Murray L. Zucker, MD,
20
Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD,
21
and Jordana Bernard, MBA
22
1
Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
2
National Association of Social Workers, Washington, D.C.
3
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, Alaska.
4
Ohio Board of Psychology, Dayton, Ohio.
5
Breakthrough, Palo Alto, California.
6
HealthLinkNow, Sacramento, California.
7
Spyrus, Inc., Santa Fe, New Mexico.
8
National Center for Telehealth and Technology/T2, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Tacoma, Washington.
9
TeleMental Health Institute, Inc., San Diego, California.
10
COPE Today, Raleigh, North Carolina.
11
Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
12
Division of Consultation Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, Vermont.
13
Clinical Innovations, Sales and Business Development, Viterion TeleHealthcare, Bellevue, Washington.
14
Rhode Island Hospit al, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry,
Providence, Rhode Island.
15
Weill Cornell Medical College, White Plains, New York.
16
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health Centers
for Am erican Indian and Alaska Native Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
17
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
18
Ontario Telehealth Network, Toronto, Canada.
19
University of California Davis, Health Informatics Graduate Program, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
20
Optum, San Francisco, California.
21
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
22
American Telemedicine Association, Washington, D.C.
Table of Contents
PREAMBLE..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................723
SCOPE.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 724
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 724
Internet-Based Telemental Health Models of Care Today ...................................................................................................................................... 724
CLINICAL GUIDELINES.....................................................................................................................................................................................................724
A. Professional and Patient Identity and Location ................................................................................................................................................. 724
1. Provider and Patient Identity Verification.....................................................................................................................................................724
2. Provider and Patient Location Documentation ............................................................................................................................................. 725
3. Contact Information Verification for Professional and Patient ..................................................................................................................725
4. Verification of Expectations Regarding Contact Between Sessions ...........................................................................................................725
B. Patient Appropriateness for Videoconferencing-Based Telemental Health ...................................................................................................725
1. Appropriateness of Videoconferencing in Settings Where Professional Staff Are Not Immediately Available...................................725
C. Informed Consent...................................................................................................................................................................................................726
722 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH SEPTEMBER 2013 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.9989
D. Physical Environment ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 726
E. Communication and Collaboration with the Patient’s Treatment Team.........................................................................................................726
F. Emergency Management ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 726
1. Education and Training ................................................................................................................................................................................... 726
2. Jurisdictional Mental Health Involuntary Hospitalization Laws................................................................................................................726
3. Patient Safety When Providing Services in a Setting with Immediately Available Professionals........................................................727
4. Patient Safety When Providing Services in a Setting Without Immediately Available Professional Staff ......................................... 727
5. Patient Support Person and Uncooperative Patients ...................................................................................................................................727
6. Transportation...................................................................................................................................................................................................727
7. Local Emergency Personnel ............................................................................................................................................................................727
G. Medical Issues.........................................................................................................................................................................................................727
H. Referral Resources..................................................................................................................................................................................................727
I. Community and Cultural Competency................................................................................................................................................................ 727
TECHNICAL GUIDELINES .................................................................................................................................................................................................727
A. Videoconferencing Applications ......................................................................................................................................................................... 728
B. Device Characteristics............................................................................................................................................................................................ 728
C. Connectivity............................................................................................................................................................................................................728
D. Privacy.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................728
ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 729
A. Qualification and Training of Professionals....................................................................................................................................................... 729
B. Documentation and Record Keeping ................................................................................................................................................................... 729
C. Payment and Billing .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 729
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 729
PREAMBLE
The American Telemedicine Association (ATA), with members from
throughout the United States and throughout the world, is the principal
organization bringing together telemedicine practitioners, healthcare in-
stitutions, vendors, and others involved in providing remote healthcare
using telecommunications. ATA is a nonprofit organization that seeks to
bring together diverse groups from traditional medicine, academia,
technology and telecommunications companies, e-health, allied profes-
sional and nursing associations, medical societies, government, and others
to overcome barriers to the advancement of telemedicine through the
professional, ethical, and equitable improvement in healthcare delivery.
ATA has embarked on an effort to establish practice guidelines and
technical standards for telemedicine to help advance the science and
to assure the uniform quality of service to patients. These guidelines,
based on clinical and empirical experience, are developed by working
groups that include experts from the field and other strategic stake-
holders and designed to serve as both an operational reference and an
educational tool to aid in providing appropriate care for patients. The
guidelines and standards generated by ATA undergo a thorough
consensus and rigorous review, with final approval by the ATA Board of
Directors. Existing products are reviewed and updated periodically.
The practice of medicine is an integration of both the science and art
of preventing, diagnosing, and treating diseases. Accordingly, it should
be recognized that compliance with these guidelines will not guarantee
accurate diagnoses or successful outcomes with respect to the treat-
ment of individual patients, and ATA disclaims any responsibility for such
outcomes. These guidelines are provided for informational and educa-
tional purposes only and do not set a legal standard of medical or other
healthcare. They are intended to assist practitioners in providing effec-
tive and safe medical care that is founded on current information,
available resources, and patient needs. The practice guidelines and
technical standards recognize that safe and effective practices require
specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document,
and are not a substitute for the independent medical judgment, training,
and skill of treating or consulting practitioners.
If circumstances warrant, a practitioner may responsibly pursue a course
of action different from the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of
the practitioner, such action is indicated by the condition of the patient,
restrictions or limits on available resources, or advances in information or
technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. Nonetheless, a
practitioner who uses an approach that is significantly different from these
guidelines is strongly advised to provide documentation, in the patient
record, that is adequate to explain the approach pursued.
Likewise, the technical and administrative guidelines in this docu-
ment do not purport to establish binding legal standards for carrying
out telemedicine interactions. Rather, they are the result of the ac-
cumulated knowledge and expertise of the ATA working groups and
intended to improve the technical quality and reliability of tele-
medicine encounters. The technical aspects of and administrative
procedures for specific telemedicine arrangements may vary de-
pending on the individual circumstances, including location of the
parties, resources, and nature of the interaction.
This practice guidelines document focuses on telemental health
services delivered in real time using Internet-based videoconferencing
technologies through personal computers and mobile devices. These
guidelines serve as a companion document to ATA’s Practice Guidelines
for Videoconferencing-Based Telemental Health, a document adopted in
2009 that focuses on real-time videoconferencing-based telemental
health services delivered using technologies other than the Internet.
VIDEO-BASED ONLINE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
ª MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. VOL. 19 NO. 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH 723
SCOPE
The scope of these guidelines covers the provision of mental health
services provided by a licensed healthcare professional when using
real-time videoconferencing services transmitted via the Internet.
Other certified professionals may take guidance from these guide-
lines, but the current version targets the practice of behavioral health
by licensed healthcare professionals. The guidelines pertain to tele-
mental health conducted between two parties and do not address
concerns related to multipoint videoconferencing. These guidelines
include telemental health services when the initiating, receiving, or
both sites are using a personal computer with a Webcam or a mobile
communications device (e.g., ‘smartphone,’ laptop, or tablet) with
two-way camera capability. These guidelines do not address com-
munications between professionals and clients or patients via text-
ing, e-mail, chatting, social network sites, online ‘coaching,’ or other
non-mental health services.
This document contains requirements, recommendations, or ac-
tions that are identified by text containing the key words ‘shall,’
‘should,’ or ‘may.’ ‘Shall’ indicates a required action whenever
feasible and practical under local conditions. ‘Should’ indicates an
optimal recommended action that is particularly suitable, without
mentioning or excluding others. ‘May’ indicates additional points
that may be considered to further optimize the telemental healthcare
process.
INTRODUCTION
Telemental health is one of the most active telemedicine appli-
cations rendered in the United States. Telemental health is an in-
tentionally broad term referring to the provision of mental health and
substance abuse services from a distance. Mental health is particu-
larly suited to the use of advanced communication technologies and
the Internet for delivery of care. By using advanced communication
technologies, mental health professionals are able to widen their
reach to patients in a cost-effective manner, ameliorating the mal-
distribution of specialty care.
Establishing guidelines for telemental health improves clinical
outcomes and promotes informed and reasonable patient expecta-
tions. ATA has developed core standards for telemedicine operations
that provide overarching guidance for clinical, technical, and admin-
istrative standards (www.americantelemed.org/practice/standards/
ata-standards-guidelines/core-standa rds-for-telemedicin e-operations).
1
This document provides further guidance on the clinical, technical,
and administrative as well as ethical issues as related to electronic
communication between professionals and patients using advances
in Internet-based videoconferencing technologies and the resulting
treatment models. These guidelines also serve as a companion doc-
ument to ATA’s Practice Guidelines for Videoconferencing-Based
Telemental Health, a document that focuses on real-time, video-
conferencing-based telemental health services delivered using
methods other than the Internet
2,3
and applies to the groups and
services described therein.
Other professional organizations in the United States and abroad
have published guidelines for the provision of mental healthcare
utilizing the desktop and mobile Internet-based communication
technologies.
4–7
When guidelines, position statements, or standards
from any professional organization or society exist, mental health
professionals should also review these documents and, as appropri-
ate, incorporate them into practice.
INTERNET-BASED TELEME NTAL HEALTH MODELS
OF CARE TODAY
Today, mental health professionals are using inexpensive tech-
nologies available through the proliferation of personal computers,
the Internet, mobile devices, and videoconferencing software to
provide mental health services. For example, many mental health
professionals are using widely available, commercial software
downloaded from the Internet to provide care directly to a patient’s
home or other noninstitutional setting. Internet-based Web sites can
serve as a conduit or portal for mental health professionals and pa-
tients seeking treatment online. Mental health professionals can sign
up with one or more Web-based companies and provide a profes-
sional profile that can be viewed online by prospective patients.
Patients find such sites by searching online or through word of
mouth. In both of these models of care, telemental health services are
delivered directly to the patient. Thus, methods to ensure patient
safety and privacy as well as identity verification of both profes-
sionals and patients can be implemented.
In other scenarios, mental health services are outsourced to
companies that contract with hospitals or other institutions in need of
such resources. In turn, some companies also contract with outside
professionals to provide telemental healthcare using technology
maintained and provided by the company.
This is a rapidly growing and evolving field, and the risks and
benefits of telemental health services delivered using videoconfer-
encing technologies are not widely discussed or addressed in formal
training of mental health practitioners. Therefore, thoughtful eluci-
dation of the key issues and the potential solutions are needed to
better inform those who want to practice responsibly.
CLINICAL GUIDELINES
A. PROFESSIO NAL AND PATIENT IDENTITY
AND LOCATION
At the beginning of a video-based mental health treatment (i.e.,
not at every subsequent encounter unless circumstances warrant
reverification) with a patient, the following essential information
shall be verified:
1. Provider and patient identity verification. The name and cre-
dentials of the professional and the name of the patient shall be veri-
fied. For services with the patient at a remote healthcare institution, the
verification of both professional and patient may occur at the host
clinic. When providing professional services to a patient in a setting
without an immediately available mental health professional, the tele-
health provider shall provide the patient (or legal representative) with
his or her qualifications, licensure information, and, when applicable,
registration number and where the patient can verify this information.
TURVEY ET AL.
724 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH SEPTEMBER 2013
Patients shall provide their full name. Professionals may ask patients to
verify their identity more formally by showing a government-issued
photo ID on the video screen or by using a smart card.
2. Provider and patient location documentation. The location(s)
where the patient will be receiving services by videoconferencing
shall be confirmed and documented by the provider. In addition, the
location of the provider may need to be documented, especially in
cases where such documentation is needed for the appropriate pay-
ment of services. However, it is not necessary for the mental health
provider to reveal his or her specific location to the patient, especially
if the provider is located at home at the time of the service.
Verification of provider and patient location is critical for four key
reasons:
a. The professional shall comply with the relevant licensing laws
in the jurisdiction where the provider is physically located
when providing the care and where the patient is located when
receiving care. Note that in the United States the jurisdictional
licensure requirement is usually tied to where the patient is
physically located when he or she is receiving the care, not
where the patient lives.
8
b. The emergency management protocol is entirely dependent
upon where the patient receives services. Once again, where
the patient resides is only relevant if that is also where he or
she is receiving care.
c. Mandatory reporting and related ethical requirements such as
duty to notify are tied to the jurisdiction where the patient is
receiving services.
d. In some cases, provider payment amounts are tied to where the
provider and patient are located.
When patients are receiving telemental health services at an accre-
dited health center, the emergency management and reporting proto-
cols shall be coordinated with the remote health center in accordance
with applicable jurisdictional law and licensing requirements.
In instances where the mental health professional is providing ser-
vices to patients in settings without clinical staff immediately available
and/or to patients who change locations over the course of treatment,
they should discuss the importance of consistency in where the patient
chooses to receive care as it is tied to emergency management. Although
patients who change locations may likely remain in the same state, they
may change cities, which will impact emergency management protocols
related to police intervention and location of local emergency rooms
willing to evaluate potentially lethal psychiatric issues.
3. Contact information verification for professional and pa-
tient. The contact information for both provider and patient shall be
verified. This shall include gathering telephone and mail contact
information for both the provider and the patient and may also in-
clude contact information through electronic sources such as e-mail.
4. Verification of expectations regarding contact between ses-
sions. Reasonable expectations about contact between sessions shall
be discussed and verified with the patient. At the start of the treat-
ment, the patient and provider should discuss whether or not the
provider will be available for phone or electronic contact between
sessions and the conditions under which such contact is appropriate.
The provider should provide a specific time frame for expected re-
sponse between session contacts. This should also include a discus-
sion of emergency management between sessions.
B. PATIENT APPROPRIATENESS FOR
VIDEOCONFERENCING-BASED TELEMENTAL HEALTH
To date, no studies have identified any patient subgroup that does
not benefit from, or is harmed by, mental healthcare provided
through remote videoconferencing. Recent large randomized con-
trolled trials have demonstrated effectiveness of telemental health,
with many smaller trials also supporting this conclusion.
9–11
Re-
garding specific subgroups, such as patients with psychotic or phobic
disorders, one review by Sharp et al.
12
found no evidence for infe-
riority of videoconferencing telemental health for patients with
psychosis. Dongier et al.
13
compared in-person versus videoconfer-
encing interviews in psychotic patients and concluded that even
those with delusions pertaining to the TV responded appropriately to
videoconferencing and did not incorporate their experience into their
delusional system. Bouchard et al.
14
found videoconferencing
treatment effective for agoraphobia and panic disorder.
1. Appropriateness of videoconferencing in settings where pro-
fessional staff are not immediately available. Mental health pro-
fessionals should consider the patients’ expectations and level of
comfort with home-based care to determine the appropriateness of
using videoconferencing in this setting.
15
Provision of telemental
health services in professionally unsupervised settings requires
that the patient take a more active and cooperative role in the
treatment process than in in-person settings.
15,16
Determining
whether a patient can handle such demands may be more de-
pendent on the patient’s organizational and cognitive capacities
than on diagnosis.
When the patient is located outside an institutional location, the
patient (guardian or caretaker) is responsible for setting up the vid-
eoconferencing system at his or her site, maintaining the appropriate
computer settings, and establishing a private space. In addition, even
with establishment of a community-based emergency management
protocol, such as that described in the Emergency Management
section of this document, patient cooperation is critical for effective
safety management in settings where a professional is not immedi-
ately available.
Determining patient appropriateness for videoconferencing-based
telemental health services should, in addition to considering the pa-
tient’s ability to potentially benefit from them, rely on the profes-
sional’s assessment of the patient’s ability to arrange an appropriate
setting for receiving videoconferencing services and the patient’s
continued cooperativeness regarding managing safety issues. Pro-
fessionals should also consider such things as patient’s cogni-
tive capacity, history regarding cooperativeness with treatment
VIDEO-BASED ONLINE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
ª MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. VOL. 19 NO. 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH 725
professionals, current and past difficulties with substance abuse, and
history of violence or self-injurious behavior.
Professionals shall consider geographic distance to the nearest
emergency medical facility, efficacy of patient’s support system,
current medical status, and patient’s general level of competence
around technology when determining patient appropriateness for
videoconferencing.
Professionals should evaluate the potential for risk factors or
problems at the start of providing videoconferencing services in
settings where a professional is not immediately available. In addi-
tion, evaluation of appropriateness of videoconferencing care should
continue throughout the treatment, including monitoring of symp-
toms and patient cooperativeness in assuming the responsibilities
inherent in remote care. The consent process shall include discussion
of conditions of participation around session management so that if a
professional decides a patient can no longer be managed through
distance technology, the patient is aware that services may be dis-
continued if no longer appropriate.
C. INFORMED CONSENT
A thorough informed consent at the start of services shall be
performed. The consent should be conducted with the patient in real
time. Local, regional, and national laws regarding verbal or written
consent shall be followed. If written consent is required, then elec-
tronic signatures, assuming these are allowed in the relevant juris-
diction, may be used. The provider shall document the provision of
consent in the medical record.
The consent should include all information contained in the consent
process for in-person care, including discussion of the structure and
timing of services, record keeping, scheduling, privacy, potential risks,
confidentiality, mandatory reporting, and billing. In addition, the in-
formed consent process should include information specific to the
nature of videoconferencing as described below. The information shall
be provided in language that can be easily understood by the patient.
This is particularly important when discussing technical issues like
encryption or the potential for technical failure.
Key topics that shall be reviewed include: confidentiality and the
limits to confidentiality in electronic communication; an agreed-
upon emergency plan, particularly for patients in settings without
clinical staff immediately available; the process by which patient
information will be documented and stored; the potential for tech-
nical failure; procedures for coordination of care with other profes-
sionals; a protocol for contact between sessions; and conditions
under which telemental health services may be terminated and a
referral made to in-person care.
D. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
Both the professional and the patient’s room/environment should
aim to provide comparable professional specifications of a standard
services room. Efforts shall be made to ensure privacy so clinical
discussion cannot be overheard by others outside of the room where
the service is provided. If other people are in either the patient or the
professional’s room, both the professional and the patient shall be
made aware of the other people and agree to their presence. Seating
and lighting should be tailored to allow maximum comfort to the
participants. Both the professional and the patient should maximize
clarity and visibility of the person at the other end of the video
services. For example, patients receiving care in nontraditional set-
tings should be informed of the importance of reducing light from
windows or light emanating from behind them. Both provider and
patient cameras should be on a secure, stable platform to avoid
wobbling and shaking during the videoconferencing session. To the
extent possible, the patient and provider cameras should be placed at
the same elevation as the eyes with the face clearly visible to the other
person.
E. COMMUNICATION AND COLLABORATION
WITH THE PATIENT’S TREATMENT TEAM
Professionals shall acknowledge that optimal clinical manage-
ment of patients depends on coordination of care between a multi-
disciplinary treatment team. This shall be discussed with all patients.
However, patients may have specific privacy concerns about release
of information about mental health treatment, even to other health
professionals providing services to them, and these concerns shall be
respected.
For patients who agree to coordination of care, telemental health
professionals should arrange for appropriate and regular private
communication with other professionals involved in care for the
patient. Moreover, professionals conducting telemental health to
patients in settings without clinical staff immediately available are
encouraged to develop collaborative relationships with local com-
munity professionals, such as a patient’s local primary care provider,
as these professionals may be invaluable in case of emergencies.
F. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Providing mental healthcare to patients using videoconferencing
involves particular considerations regarding patient safety. There are
also additional considerations when providing care to patients in
settings without staff immediately available.
17
Below are issues that
should be considered in both types of practice, followed by separate
sections for emergency management for supervised and unsuper-
vised settings.
1. Education and training. Professionals should review their
discipline’s definitions of ‘competence’ prior to initiating telemental
health patient care to assure that they maintain both technical and
clinical competence for the delivery of care in this manner. Profes-
sionals shall have completed basic education and training in suicide
prevention. The depth of training and the definition of ‘basic’ are
solely at the professional’s discretion.
2. Jurisdictional mental health involuntary hospitalization laws.
Each jurisdiction has its own involuntary hospitalization and duty-
to-notify laws outlining criteria and detainment conditions. Profes-
sionals shall know and abide by the laws in the jurisdiction where the
patient is receiving services.
TURVEY ET AL.
726 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH SEPTEMBER 2013
3. Patient safety when providing services in a setting with im-
mediately available professionals. When a professional sees a patient
via personal computer and/or mobile device outside of the patient’s
home (e.g., local clinic, community-based outpatient clinic, school
site, library) or other facility where dedicated staff may be present, it
may be important that the professional become familiar with the
facility’s emergency procedures. In some cases, the facility will not
have procedures in place. In such cases, the professional should co-
ordinate with the distant site clinic to establish basic procedures. The
basic procedures may include: (1) identifying local emergency re-
sources and phone numbers; (2) becoming familiar with the location
of the nearest hospital emergency room capable of managing psy-
chiatric emergencies; and (3) having patient’s family/support contact
information. The professional may also learn the chosen emergency
response system’s average response time (30 min versus 5 h) and the
contact information for other local professional associations, such as
city, county, state, provincial, or other regional professional associ-
ation(s), in case a local referral is needed to follow up with a local
professional.
4. Patient safety when providing services in a setting without
immediately available professional staff. For treatment occurring
where the patient is in a setting without clinical staff, the professional
may request the contact information of a family or community
member who could be called upon for support in the case of an
emergency. This person will be called ‘the Patient Support Person,’
an individual selected by the patient. In the case of an emergency, the
professional may contact the Patient Support Person to request as-
sistance in evaluating the nature of the emergency and/or initiating
9-1-1 from the patient’s home telephone.
17
5. Patient Support Person and uncooperative patients. It is pos-
sible that a patient will not cooperate in his or her own emergency
management, which underlies the practice of involuntary hospitali-
zation in mental healthcare. Professionals should be prepared for this
as well as the possibility that Patient Support Persons also may not
cooperate if the patients themselves are adamant that they do not
want to seek emergency care. Therefore, any emergency plan shall
include local emergency personnel and knowledge of available re-
sources in case of involuntary hospitalization.
6. Transportation. As videoconferencing-based telemental health
has developed, in part, to increase access to patients in geographi-
cally remote areas, it is expected that there may be barriers to
transportation to local mental health services. In light of this, the
professional shall know any limitations the patient has in terms of
self-transporting and/or access to transportation. Strategies to
overcome these limitations in light of an emergency shall be devel-
oped prior to starting treatment for patients in settings without staff
immediately available.
In the event of a behavioral and/or medical emergency, the pa-
tient’s Patient Support Person should discuss with emergency per-
sonnel whether he or she should transport the patient.
7. Local emergency personnel. In providing care to patients in
settings without professional staff immediately available, determin-
ing distance between local emergency personnel in the patient’s
community and the patient’s location can shape the professional’s
decision process in determining appropriate actions.
Professionals shall acquire telephone numbers for local resources
in the patient’s community. At the beginning of each session, the
professional shall have the patient’s local emergency personnel
telephone contact information readily available. Prior to each ses-
sion, the provider shall also determine the patient’s location and
whether there have been any changes to the patient’s personal sup-
port system or the emergency management protocol.
G. MEDICAL ISSUES
In case of medication side effects, elevation in symptoms, and/or
issues related to medication noncompliance, the professional should
be familiar with the patient’s prescription and medication dispen-
sation options.
Likewise, when prescribing, the clinician should be aware of the
availability of specific medications in the geographic location of the
patient, and that should inform prescribing choices. Patients re-
ceiving treatment through telemental health services should have an
active relationship with a prescribing professional in their physical
vicinity.
If services are provided in a setting where a professional is not
immediately available, the patient may be at risk if there is an
acute change in his or her medical condition. The professional
should be familiar with whom the patient is receiving medical
services.
H. REFERRAL RESO URCES
The professional shall be familiar with local in-person mental
health resources should the professional exercise clinical judgment to
make a referral for additional mental health or other appropriate
services.
I. COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL COMPETENCY
Professionals shall be culturally competent to deliver services to
the populations that they serve. Examples of factors to consider in-
clude awareness of the client’s language, ethnicity, race, age, gender,
sexual orientation, geographical location, and socioeconomic and
cultural backgrounds. Mental health professionals may use online
resources to learn of the community where the patient resides, in-
cluding any recent significant events and cultural mores of that
community.
TECHNICAL GUIDELINES
Videoconferencing can be characterized by key features: the
videoconferencing application, device characteristics including their
mobility, network or connectivity features, and how privacy and
security are maintained. The more recent use of desktop and mobile
devices requires consideration of each of these.
VIDEO-BASED ONLINE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
ª MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. VOL. 19 NO. 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH 727
A. VIDEOCONFERENCING APPLICATIONS
All efforts shall be taken to use videoconferencing applications
that have been vetted and have the appropriate verification, confi-
dentiality, and security parameters necessary to be properly utilized
for this purpose.
Video software platforms should not be used when they include
social media functions that notify users when anyone on a contact list
logs on. Many free video chat platforms include such functionality as
a ‘default setting,’ which should be changed before providing video-
based clinical services. These platforms may also include the capa-
bility to create a video chat ‘room’ that allows others to enter at will.
This type of functionality should be disabled.
B. DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS
When using a personal computer, both the professional device for
video transmission and the patient’s site should, when feasible, use
professional-grade or high-quality cameras and audio equipment
now widely available for personal computers. Personal computers
shall have up-to-date antivirus software and a personal firewall in-
stalled. Providers should ensure their personal computer or mobile
device has the latest security patches and updates applied to the
operating system and third-party applications that may be utilized
for this purpose.
Provider organizations should utilize mobile device management
software to provide consistent oversight of applications, device and
data configuration, and security of the mobile devices used within the
organization.
In the event of a technology breakdown, causing a disruption of
the session, the professional shall have a backup plan in place. The
plan shall be communicated to the patient prior to commencement of
treatment and may also be included in the general emergency
management protocol. The professional may review the technology
backup plan on a routine basis.
The plan may include calling the patient via telephone and at-
tempting to troubleshoot the issue together. The plan may also
include providing the patient with access to other mental health-
care. If the technical issue cannot be resolved, the professional may
elect to complete the session via a voice-based telecommunication
system.
Screen-in-screen options, also known as picture-in-a-picture or
‘PIP,’ may also be used when feasible and are widely available in
professional-grade desktop videoconferencing software packages.
Professionals and patients may opt to use cameras that allow for pan,
tilt, and zoom for maximal flexibility in viewing the remote room.
C. CONNECTIVITY
Telemental healthcare services provided through personal com-
puters or mobile devices that use Internet-based videoconferenc-
ing software programs should provide such services at a bandwidth of
384 kilobits per second (Kbps) or higher in each of the downlink and
uplink directions. Such services should provide a minimum of
640 · 360 resolution at 30 frames per second. Because different tech-
nologies provide different video quality results at the same bandwidth,
each end point shall use bandwidth sufficient to achieve at least the
minimum quality shown above during normal operation.
Where practical, providers may recommend preferred videocon-
ferencing software and/or video and audio hardware to the patient, as
well as providing any relevant software and/or hardware configu-
ration considerations.
The provider and/or patient may use link test tools (e.g., bandwidth
test) to pretest the connection before starting their session to ensure
the link has sufficient quality to support the session.
Where possible, each party should use the most reliable connection
method to access the Internet. Where wired connections are available
(e.g., Ethernet), they should be used.
The videoconference software should be able to adapt to changing
bandwidth environments without losing the connection.
D. PRIVACY
The videoconference software should be capable of blocking the
provider’s caller ID at the request of the provider.
All efforts shall be taken to make audio and video transmission
secure by using point-to-point encryption that meets recognized
standards. Currently, FIPS 140-2, known as the Federal Information
Processing Standard, is the U.S. Government security standard used
to accredit encryption standards of software and lists encryption such
as AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) as providing acceptable
levels of security. Providers should familiarize themselves with the
technologies available regarding computer and mobile device secu-
rity and should help educate the patient.
When the patient and/or provider use a mobile device, special
attention should be placed on the relative privacy of information
being communicated over such technology.
Providers should ensure access to any patient contact information
stored on mobile devices is adequately restricted.
Mobile devices shall require a passphrase or equivalent security
feature before the device can be accessed. If multifactor authenti-
cation is available, it should be used.
Mobile devices should be configured to utilize an inactivity
timeout function that requires a passphrase or re-authentication to
access the device after the timeout threshold has been exceeded. This
timeout should not exceed 15 min.
Mobile devices should be kept in the possession of the provider
when traveling or in an uncontrolled environment. Unauthorized
persons shall not be allowed access to sensitive information stored on
the device or use the device to access sensitive applications or net-
work resources.
Providers should have the capability to remotely disable or wipe
their mobile device in the event it is lost or stolen.
Videoconference software shall not allow multiple concurrent
sessions to be opened by a single user. Should a second session at-
tempt to be opened, the system shall either log off the first session or
block the second session from being opened.
Session logs stored in third-party locations (i.e., not on patients’ or
providers’ access device) shall be secure. Access to these session logs
shall only be granted to authorized users.
TURVEY ET AL.
728 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH SEPTEMBER 2013
Protected health information (PHI) and other confidential data
shall only be backed up to or stored on secure data storage locations.
Cloud services unable to achieve compliance shall not be used for PHI
or confidential data.
Professionals may monitor whether any of the videoconference
transmission data is intentionally or inadvertently stored on the
patient’s or professional’s computer’s hard drive. If so, the hard drive
of the provider should use whole disk encryption to the FIPS standard
to ensure security and privacy. Preboot authentication should also be
used. Professionals should educate patients about the potential for
inadvertently stored data and patient information and provide
guidance on how best to protect privacy.
Professionals and patients shall discuss any intention to record
services and how this information is to be stored and how privacy will
be protected. Recordings should be encrypted for maximum security.
Access to the recordings shall only be granted to authorized users and
should be streamed to protect from accidental or unauthorized file
sharing and/or transfer. The professional may also want to discuss his
or her policy with regard to the patient-sharing portions of this in-
formation with the general public. Written agreements pertaining to
this issue can protect both the patient and the professional.
If services are recorded, the recordings shall be stored in a secured
location. Access to the recordings shall only be granted to authorized
users.
ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES
A. QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING OF PROFESSIONALS
In addition to clinical, legal, and ethical training required for li-
censure for in-person services, professionals shall make use of the
widely available resources providing education of proper conduct of
videoconferencing to both professionally supervised settings and
those without readily available clinical staff. Mental health profes-
sionals shall also determine whether there are site-specific cre-
dentialing requirements where the patient is located.
Professionals shall conduct care consistent with the jurisdictional
licensing laws and rules for their profession in both the jurisdiction in
which they are practicing and that where the patient is receiving care.
Licensed mental health professionals should contact their licens-
ing board to review their practice before starting any provision of
telemental health services. The professional should also contact the
licensing board relevant to the patient’s location during treatment, to
determine whether or not the services provided fall under their ju-
risdiction and what, if any, restrictions exist.
B. DOCUMEN TATION AND RECORD KEEPING
Professionals shall maintain an electronic record for each patient
for whom they provide remote services. Such a record should include
an assessment, client identification information, contact informa-
tion, history, treatment plan, informed consent, and information
about fees and billing.
A treatment plan based upon an assessment of the patient’s needs
should be developed and documented. The plan should meet
the professional’s discipline standards and guidelines and include a
description of what services are to be provided and the goals for
services.
Services should be accurately documented as remote services and
include dates, duration, and type of service(s) provided.
Documentation shall comply with applicable jurisdictional and
federal laws and regulations. Policies for record retention and dis-
posal should be in place.
All communications with the patient (e.g., written, audiovisual, or
verbal) shall be documented in the patient’s unique record, and all
such records shall be stored in compliance with relevant government
regulations, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Account-
ability Act (HIPAA) and HI-TECH within the United States.
15
Requests for access to such records shall require written authori-
zation from the patient with a clear indication of what types of data
and which information is to be released. If professionals are storing
the audiovisual data from the sessions, these cannot be released
unless the patient authorization indicates specifically that this is to be
released. Upon direction and written approval by the patient, the
patient’s record shall be made available to another provider that is
caring for the patient.
All billing and administrative data related to the patient shall be
secured to protect confidentiality: specifically, all records are con-
fidential; HIPAA regulations regarding psychotherapy notes are
adhered to; and only relevant information is released for reim-
bursement purposes as outlined by HIPAA in the United States.
C. PAYMENT AND BILLING
Prior to the commencement of initial services, the patient shall be
made aware of any and all financial charges that may arise from the
services to be provided. Arrangement for payment should be com-
pleted prior to the commencement of services.
REFERENCES
1. Core standards for telemedicine operations. Washington, DC: American
Telemedicine Association, 2007. Available at www.americantelemed.org/
practice/standards/ata-standards-guidelines/core-standards-for-telemedicine-
operations (last accessed July 22, 2013).
2. Grady B, Myers KM, Nelson EL, Belz N, Bennett L, Carnahan L, Decker VB, Holden
D, Perry G, Rosenthal L, Rowe N, Spaulding R, Turvey CL, White R, Voyles D.
Evidence-based practice for telemental health. Telemed J E Health 2011;
17:131–148.
3. Yellowlees P, Shore J, Roberts L. Practice guidelines for videoconferencing-
based telemental health—October 2009. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:1074–
1089.
4. APA-ASPPB-APAIT Guidelines for the Practice of Telepsychology (adoption
pending): Personal communication, Debora Baker, JD, July 22, 2013; Director of
Legal and Regulatory Policy, American Psychological Association.
5. Australian Psychological Society. Guidelines for providing psychological services
and products using the internet and telecommunications technologies. 2011.
Available at http://aaswsocialmedia.wikispaces.com/file/view/EG-Internet.pdf
(last accessed July 22, 2013).
6. Standards for technology and social work practice. National Association of
Social Workers and ASWB Standards for Technology and Social Work Practice.
2005. Available at www.socialworkers.org/practice/standards/
naswtechnologystandards.pdf (last accessed July 22, 2013).
VIDEO-BASED ONLINE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
ª MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. VOL. 19 NO. 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH 729
7. Ohio Psychological Association. Telepsychology guidelines. 2010. Available at
www.ohpsych.org/psychologists/files/2011/06/
OPATelepsychologyGuidelines41710.pdf (last accessed July 22, 2013).
8. Hyler SE, Gangure DP. Legal and ethical challenges in telepsychiatry. J Psychiatr
Pract 2004;10:272–276.
9. Day SX, Schneider PL. Psychotherapy using distance technology: A comparison of
face-to-face, video, and audio treatment. J Couns Psychol 2002;49:499–503.
10. O’Reilly R, Bishop J, Maddox K, Hutchinson L, Fisman M, Takhar J. Is
telepsychiatry equivalent to face-to-face psychiatry? Results from a
randomized controlled equivalence trial. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:836–843.
11. Ruskin PE, Silver-Aylaian M, Kling MA, Reed SA, Bradham DD, Hebel JR, et al.
Treatment outcomes in depression: Comparison of remote treatment through
telepsychiatry to in-person treatment. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1471–1476.
12. Sharp IR, Kobak KA, Osman DA. The use of videoconferencing with patients with
psychosis: A review of the literature. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2011;10:14.
13. Dongier M, Tempier R, Lalinec-Michaud M, Meunier D. Telepsychiatry:
Psychiatric consultation through two-way television. A controlled study. Can J
Psychiatry 1986;31:32–34.
14. Bouchard S, Paquin B, Payeur R, Allard M, Rivard V, Fournier T, Renaud P,
Lapierre J. Delivering cognitive-behavior therapy for panic disorder with
agoraphobia in videoconference. Telemed J E Health 2004;10:13–25.
15. Luxton DD, O’Brien K, McCann RA, Mishkind MC. Home-based telemental
healthcare safety planning: What you need to know. Telemed J E Health
2012;18:629–633.
16. Luxton DD, Sirotin AP, Mishkind MC. Safety of telemental healthcare delivered
to clinically unsupervised settings: A systematic review. Telemed J E Health
2010;16:705–711.
17. Shore P. Home-based telemental health (HBTMH) standard operating
procedures manual. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 2011.
Address correspondence to:
Carolyn Turvey, PhD
Department of Psychiatry
The Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine
University of Iowa
500 Newton Road, 2-204 MEB
Iowa City, IA 52242-1000
E-mail: carolyn-turvey@uiowa.edu
Received: June 20, 2013
Accepted: June 24, 2013
TURVEY ET AL.
730 TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH SEPTEMBER 2013
This article has been cited by:
1. Charles R. Doarn, Ronald C. Merrell. 2013. Shouldn't It Be Simpler Than That?. Telemedicine and e-Health 19:9, 651-651.
[Citation] [Full Text HTML] [Full Text PDF] [Full Text PDF with Links]
... A light blue color is generally recommended for its calming effect, which is consistent with the color of the hospital's logo provided in the Garden Room. To maintain focus, it is important to avoid clutter and distractions (18). The conditions for an optimal video consultation do not only apply to the area of the healthcare provider but also to the space of the patient. ...
... The conditions for an optimal video consultation do not only apply to the area of the healthcare provider but also to the space of the patient. For an optimal conversation, patients can be informed about the location of their video call (17)(18)(19). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Accelerated by the coronavirus pandemic, the healthcare landscape is rapidly evolving, with a shift towards hybrid care models combining in-person and online care. To support this shift, the Radboudumc, an academic hospital in the Netherlands, decided to redesign an existing space facilitating the conduction of video consultations. Method The design process involved participation of end-users to ensure that the physical space met their needs. The look and feel of the area was based on evidence-based design guidelines. Two prototype setups were built and tested, and the feedback informed the final design of the Garden Room. Results Identified end-user needs were divided into 3 major categories entailing consultation room setup, optimal use of technology and practical issues involving room availability. Combined with the look and feel of the hospital, final design requirements were developed. The Garden Room consists of 18 video consultation rooms, 4 shared workspaces, relaxation area with kitchen, and meeting rooms. Specific attention is given to the ergonomics, technology and privacy in the rooms to facilitate optimal video conversations between patients and healthcare providers. In the Garden Room, natural elements and an open design supports working in a healing environment. Discussion Next challenge will be optimizing the use of the Garden Room, which may be hindered by various barriers like resistance to change, existing work processes, and lack of skills training. To address these barriers and support use of the Garden Room, the hospital should focus on the implementation of education, changes in work processes, and the presence of advocates for telehealth.
... TM is the broader term and covers synchronous (video, telephone) and asynchronous ('store and forward', ie, emails, SMS) technologies. 2 Experimentation with TM in medical settings first began in the 1950s. These studies were based on a simple two-way closed-circuit television and TM was used for treatment and education purposes. ...
... The bias domain that will be assessed include (a) bias arising from the randomisation process, (b) bias due to deviations from intended interventions, (c) bias due to missing outcome data, (d) bias in the measurement of the outcome and (e) bias in the selection of the reported result. Overall risks of bias for each study outcome will be marked as: (1) 'low risk of bias' if all domains are judged to be low, (2) 'some concerns' if at least one domain are judged to raise some concerns but not to be at high risk of bias for any domain and (3) 'high risk of bias' if any domain is judged to be at high risk of bias. Disagreement between the mentioned researchers regarding the risk of bias will be resolved through consensus or a third researcher (OJS). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Major advancements in technology have led to considerations how telemedicine (TM) and other technology platforms can be meaningfully integrated in treatment for psychiatric disorders. The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a further focus on use of TM in psychiatry. Despite the widespread use of TM, little is known about its effect compared with traditional in-person (IP) consultation. The objective of this systematic review is to examine if individual psychiatric outpatient interventions for adults using TM are comparable to IP in terms of (1) psychopathology outcomes, (2) levels of patient satisfaction, (3) working alliance and (4) dropout from treatment. Methods and analysis This review will only include randomised controlled trials for adult participants with mood disorders, anxiety or personality disorders. The primary outcome is psychopathology, and secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, treatment alliance and dropout rate. Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL. The inverse-variance method will be used to conduct the meta-analysis. Effect sizes will be calculated as standardised mean difference (Hedges’ g) for the primary outcome, mean difference for patient satisfaction and working alliance, and risk ratio for the dropout rate. Effect sizes will be supplemented with 95% CI. We will calculate the I² statistic to quantify heterogeneity and Chi-square statistic (χ²) to test for heterogeneity for the primary outcome. Potential clinical and methodological heterogeneity moderators will be assessed in subgroup and sensitivity analysis. The risk of bias will be assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool V.2, and confidence in cumulative evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this systematic review protocol. Data sets will be deposited in the Zenodo repository. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-review scientific journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021256357.
... revivientes de agresión sexual, consumo de sustancias y relaciones violentas de pareja o violencia de género, en tanto que argumentan que es dichos contextos no es tan sencillo establecer el estado psicológico, por lo que se sugiere que sean remitidos a atención presencial y derivados a servicios sanitarios (APA, 2018;Naal, Whaibeh y Mahmoud, 2020;Turvey et. al, 2013). En el mismo orden de ideas, al tratarse de una intervención psicológica orientada a la disminución de síntomas clínicos, existe una limitante de base en el desempeño del psicólogo que, aunque considera la importancia sustancial de los recursos económicos y familiares que podrían afectar en la asistencia y/o adherencia a la intervención ...
... Thus, these adaptations can be seen as manifestations of the primordial tension of participatory sense-making, that is, the coordination of individual and interactive processes and norms in social encounters. Attending to this tension between the relational and individual domains and how the interactive and self-regulatory mechanisms are altered may be useful to therapists facing a transition to online professional activity and to develop future guidelines (Kraus et al., 2004;Turvey et al., 2013). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
The quality of patient and therapist relationship has been identified as the main common factor for the success of a therapeutic process. However, the research on the therapeutic relationship has been overly influenced by cognitivist approaches in cognitive science and mindreading and simulationist theories of empathy. These approaches to intersubjectivity, however, do not do justice to the complexity of the therapist-patient interactions and the transformative potential of therapeutic encounters. In this regard, two outstanding problems can be identified in psychology and cognitive sciences: methodological individualism and the mindbody divide. As an alternative, the present thesis proposes an enactive approach to psychiatry and psychotherapy that goes beyond a purely “mentalistic” conception of the therapeutic alliance and empathy towards a second-person and embodied perspective, highlighting the constitutive role of pre-reflective engagements of therapists and patients in the therapeutic process. It builds on the enactive theory of intersubjectivity as participatory sense-making, which describes the coordination of intentional and non-intentional activities as preconditions from which shared meanings emerge in interpersonal interactions. On this basis, clinical empathy is defined as a participatory and pre-reflective process of knowing-how to respond to the solicitations of patients. Along with the relational turn in psychotherapy, the thesis adopts a second-person perspective by placing participatory sense-making processes at the center of the investigation. Accordingly, it presents three pieces of work applying the enactive framework to research in psychotherapy: (1) a comment on correlational studies on non-verbal coordination and psychotherapeutic outcome, where new working hypothesis and interpretation of empirical data are suggested; (2) an interpretativephenomenological-analysis of the pre-reflective intercorporeal mechanisms involved in the transition from face-to-face to online therapeutic settings, and (3) a phenomenological-enactive analysis and classification of therapeutic interventions on the body in dialogic therapies. These works illustrate that the enactive framework can potentially promote a particular way of doing science in psychotherapy research. In addition to that, the thesis suggests a theoretical deepening of the theory of participatory sense-making under the lens of two related perspectives – phenomenology of atmospheres and Gilbert Simondon’s philosophy of individuation. This analysis highlights the pathic character of the lived body and the pre-individual dimension of experience. The discourse on atmospheres is contrasted with enactive-ecological theories of affordances and a possible definition of mental disorders as disorders of affectivity is suggested. The thesis concludes that the theory of participatory sense-making should be understood in terms of transindividuality, that is, as holding the tension between the sense of belonging to a “primordial we” and the objectification of the other, a tension that allows for differential degrees of pre-individual affective participation. This perspective is particularly relevant to understand the complexity of modes of participation in the therapist-patient dyad.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Mental health practitioners of SHOJON need to be aware that remote services are as important as any in-person services and, conducting therapy using remote methods should aim at maximizing simulation of standards of care for in-person practice. But the setup of tele-counseling service, like SHOJON, is new in Bangladesh. So, an in-depth review of the existing organizations focusing on tele-mental health is warranted before establishing the organizational Standard Operational Procedures (SOPs) or Protocols of SHOJON. In this regard, SMHP has conducted a desk review on the existing telepsychiatry guidelines adapted by different recognized mental health organizations worldwide. The findings obtained from this desk review will help SHOJON to get insight as well as determine the Clinical protocol, Operational protocol, Legal guidelines, and Data management protocols, and to ensure quality tele-counseling service in Bangladesh.
Chapter
Telebehavioral health (TBH) is the use of information and communication technologies (ICT), including but not limited to videoconferencing, to remotely deliver behavioral health services (BHS). While this is the most widely accepted definition, TBH has evolved with the advances in ICT and models of healthcare delivery, and the more “traditional” definition of two-way live videoconferencing has expanded to incorporate digital self-navigated modules, asynchronous care delivery, smartphone applications, and different consultative models. This has led to the use of some terms such as electronic health (e-health), mobile health (m-health), and digital health under the umbrella of TBH. As mentioned in Chap. 1, while recognizing the utility of different approaches to delivering virtual BHS, this book focuses primarily on the delivery of direct patient care via videoconferencing in a synchronous manner between two parties, the teleclinician and the patient.
Article
Background A substantial proportion of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience depression, which has been negatively associated with recovery and community participation after injury. Despite significant barriers to seeking and receiving in-person mental health care, little research has focused on the efficacy of telepsychology among individuals with SCI. Objectives To describe the design and implementation of an ongoing single-center, randomized controlled, video-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention among individuals with SCI. Methods Participants within 1 year of SCI will be randomized 1:1 to intervention or usual care in a 24-week study. Intervention participants will engage in 10 sessions of CBT over 12 weeks with a licensed clinical psychologist, using iPads via Apple FaceTime. Primary outcomes are depressive symptomatology, anxiety, and life satisfaction (as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Satisfaction with Life Scale, respectively) measured at three time points (baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks). These and other measures are also assessed during monthly telephone surveys conducted between primary timepoints. Results Recruitment is ongoing. Forty-six participants have been enrolled thus far. Conclusion Telepsychology is a convenient, flexible, and effective alternative to traditional in-person services. We anticipate that intervention participants will experience improvements in depressive and anxiety symptoms and will have greater life satisfaction. Telepsychology interventions among individuals with SCI are tasked to maintain participant privacy, provide assistive technology and/or engage caregivers to minimize mobility limitations, and manage risk remotely. Challenges encountered include recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Early intervention on symptoms of psychological morbidity using telepsychology may facilitate greater adaptation following SCI.
Article
Objective: To identify which Veteran populations are routinely accessing video-based care. Data sources and study setting: National, secondary administrative data from electronic health records at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), 2019-2021 STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort analysis identified patient characteristics associated with the odds of using any video care; and then, among those with a previous video visit, the annual rate of video care utilization. Video care use was reported overall and stratified into care type (e.g., primary, mental health, and specialty video care) between March 10, 2020 and February 28, 2021. Data collection: Veterans active in VA health care (>1 outpatient visit between March 11, 2019 and March 10, 2020) were included in this study. Principal findings: Among 5,389,129 Veterans in this evaluation, approximately 27.4% of Veterans had at least one video visit. We found differences in video care utilization by type of video care: 14.7% of Veterans had at least one primary care video visit, 10.6% a mental health video visit, and 5.9% a specialty care video visit. Veterans with a history of housing instability had a higher overall rate of video care driven by their higher usage of video for mental health care compared with Veterans in stable housing. American Indian/Alaska Native Veterans had reduced odds of video visits, yet similar rates of video care when compared to White Veterans. Low-income Veterans had lower odds of using primary video care yet slightly elevated rates of primary video care among those with at least one video visit when compared to Veterans enrolled at VA without special considerations. Conclusions: Variation in video care utilization patterns by type of care identified Veteran populations that might require greater resources and support to initiate and sustain video care use. Our data support service specific outreach to homeless and American Indian/Alaska Native Veterans.
Article
Background: Telemedicine has emerged as a feasible adjunct to in-person care in multiple clinical contexts, and its role has expanded in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there exists a general paucity of information surrounding best practice recommendations for conducting specialty or disease-specific virtual care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review existing best practice guidelines for conducting telemedicine encounters. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) of existing guidelines for the provision of virtual care was performed. Data were synthesized using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guideline, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results: A total of 60 guidelines for virtual care encounters were included; 52% of these were published in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority (95%) of provider guidelines specified a type of virtual encounter to which their guidelines applied. Of included guidelines, 65% provided guidance regarding confidentiality/security, 58% discussed technology/setup, and 56% commented on patient consent. Thirty-one guidelines also provided guidance to patients or caregivers. Overall guideline quality was poor. Discussion: General best practices for successful telemedicine encounters include ensuring confidentiality and consent, preparation before a visit, and clear patient communication. Future studies should aim to objectively assess the efficacy of existing clinician practices and guidelines on patient attitudes and outcomes to further optimize the provision of virtual care for specific patient populations.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Telemental health (TMH) care provided directly to the home is an emerging area of care delivery. TMH care involves awareness of safety issues and adequate safety planning, although detailed practical recommendations for home-based TMH safety planning are absent in the literature. With this article we aim to increase awareness of safety issues associated with home-based synchronous TMH treatment and to discuss recommendations for consistent safety planning that can inform the development of standard operating procedures, emergency protocols, and overall good TMH practice. Specific areas discussed include consideration of state and local requirements, appropriateness of TMH care, technology and infrastructure, and emergency management and monitoring procedures. The topic of safety, as it relates to TMH policy, as well as the need for additional TMH research are also discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The rise in the use of mobile devices, such as smartphones, tablet personal computers, and wireless medical devices, as well as the wireless networks that enable their use, has raised new concerns for data security and integrity. Standardized Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)-compliant electronic data security that will allow ubiquitous use of mobile health technologies is needed. The lack of standardized data security to assure privacy, to allow interoperability, and to maximize the full capabilities of mobile devices presents a significant barrier to care. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the issue and to encourage discussion of this important topic. Current security needs, standards, limitations, and recommendations for how to address this barrier to care are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Videoconferencing has become an increasingly viable tool in psychiatry, with a growing body of literature on its use with a range of patient populations. A number of factors make it particularly well suited for patients with psychosis. For example, patients living in remote or underserved areas can be seen by a specialist without need for travel. However, the hallmark symptoms of psychotic disorders might lead one to question the feasibility of videoconferencing with these patients. For example, does videoconferencing exacerbate delusions, such as paranoia or delusions of reference? Are acutely psychotic patients willing to be interviewed remotely by videoconferencing? To address these and other issues, we conducted an extensive review of Medline, PsychINFO, and the Telemedicine Information Exchange databases for literature on videoconferencing and psychosis. Findings generally indicated that assessment and treatment via videoconferencing is equivalent to in person and is tolerated and well accepted. There is little evidence that patients with psychosis have difficulty with videoconferencing or experience any exacerbation of symptoms; in fact, there is some evidence to suggest that the distance afforded can be a positive factor. The results of two large clinical trials support the reliability and effectiveness of centralized remote assessment of patients with schizophrenia.
Article
Full-text available
This document was prepared in response to the needs and requests of providers, organizations, and the ATA membership interested in or engaged in TMH activities, for the development of evidence-based TMH guidelines. The broad nature of the mental health field along with an unlimited number of ways to use technology in mental health services led the committee to limit this evidence-based document to interactive video conferencing applications. Appreciating the broad range of providers and settings involved in TMH, recommendations are organized by patient age, types of treatment, treatment setting, and provider specialty. The coding system was developed to encourage more specific descriptions of the technology being used in TMH interactive videoconferencing research and methods publication. It provides recommendations based on clinical confidence derived from the published literature, committee members, and expert reviewers. The committee hopes that the users of this document will benefit from the recommendations, literature references, and the development of a clinical/technical coding system. The document structure and headings were selected in anticipation that users will note the clinical applications that are in most need of additional evidence-based research and perhaps select these areas as a focus of future research.
Article
Full-text available
The safety of telemental healthcare delivered to clinically unsupervised settings, such as a personal residence, must be established to inform policy and further the dissemination of telemental health programs. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of safety issues associated with telemental healthcare and, through a systematic literature review, evaluate the safety of telemental healthcare delivered to unsupervised settings. The review resulted in a total of nine studies that specifically evaluated the delivery of telemental healthcare to unsupervised settings. Six of the nine studies reviewed explicitly described safety plans or specific precautions that could be used if necessary. Two of the nine studies reported events that required the researchers to use safety procedures to effectively respond to concerns they had regarding participant safety. In both of these studies, the issues were resolved with prescribed safety procedures. Recommendations and future directions for the development and evaluation of safety protocols are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Delivering psychotherapy by videoconference could significantly increase the accessibility of empirically validated treatments. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) for panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA) when the therapy is delivered either face-to-face or by videoconference. A sample of 21 participants was treated either face-to-face or by videoconference. Results showed that CBT delivered by videoconference was as effective as CBT delivered face-to-face. There was a statistically significant reduction in all measures, and the number of panic-free participants among those receiving CBT by videoconference was 81% at post-treatment and 91% at the 6-month follow-up. None of the comparisons with face-to-face psychotherapy suggested that CBT delivered by videoconference was less effective. These results were confirmed by analyses of effect size. The participants reported the development of an excellent therapeutic alliance in videoconference as early as the first therapy session. The importance of these results for treatment accessibility is discussed. Hypotheses are proposed to explain the rapid creation of strong therapeutic alliances in videoconferencing.
Article
This study compared selected process and outcome variables across 3 modes of psychotherapy: face-to-face, real-time video conference, and 2-way audio (analogous to telephone). Results from 80 randomly assigned clients suggested that differences in process and outcome among the 3 treatments were small and clinically promising in comparison with the untreated control group. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
ATAlogo_250px.tif Evidence-Based Practice for Telemental Health ATAlogo_200px.tif Evidence-Based Practice for Telemental Health ATAlogo_175px.tif Evidence-Based Practice for Telemental Health ATAlogo_150px.tif Evidence-Based Practice for Telemental Health ATAlogo_75px.tif Evidence-Based Practice for Telemental Health ATAlogo_70px.tif Telemental Health Standards and Guidelines Working Group Co-Chairs: Brian Grady, MD Kathleen Myers, MD, MPH Eve-Lynn Nelson, PhD Writing Committees: Evidence-Based Practice for Telemental Health Norbert Belz, MHSA RHIA, Leslie Bennett, LCSW, Lisa Carnahan, PhD, Veronica Decker, APRN, BC, MBA, Brian Grady, MD, Dwight Holden, MD, Kathleen Myers, MD, MPH, Eve-Lynn Nelson, PhD, Gregg Perry, MD, Lynne S. Rosenthal, PhD, Nancy Rowe, Ryan Spaulding, PhD, Carolyn Turvey, PhD, Debbie Voyles, Robert White, MA, LCPC Practice Guidelines for Videoconferencing-Based Telemental Health Peter Yellowlees, MD, Jay Shore, MD, Lisa Roberts, PhD Contributors: Working Group Members [WG], Consultant...
Article
Telepsychiatry (consultation carried out through 2-way interactive television) has been the object of a number of trials in the past twenty years, but to our knowledge there is no previous control study which compares CCTV and face-to-face interviews. Various aspects of the interviews carried out on CCTV were rated on a 5-point scale in questionnaires filled out by: (a) patients; (b) consultees and; (c) consultants. No significant difference was elicited with control interviews in respect to patients' diagnosis, age and sex. CCTV interview ratings by consultee and consultant were rated only slightly below those of the control group. Such findings should encourage a broader application of interactive CCTV, particularly as a complement to live consultations in distant areas.