ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This article describes a model of teacher change originally presented nearly two decades ago (Guskey, 1986) that began my long and warm friendship with Michael Huberman. The model portrays the temporal sequence of events from professional develop- ment experiences to enduring change in teachers' attitudes and perceptions. Research evidence supporting the model is summarized and the conditions under which change might be facilitated are described. The development and presentation of this model initiated a series of professional collaborations between Michael and myself, and led to the development of our co-edited book, Professional Development in Education: new paradigms and practices (Guskey & Huberman, 1995), which was namedBook of the Year' by the National Staff Development Council in 1996.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Teachers an d Teaching: theory and practice, Vol. 8, No. 3/4, 2002
Professional Development and Teacher
Change
T
HOMAS
R. G
USKEY
ABSTRACT
This article describes a model of teacher change originally presented nearly
two decades ago (Guskey, 1986) that began m y long and warm friendship with Michael
Huberman. The model portrays the temporal sequence of events from professional develop-
ment experiences to enduring change in teachers’ attitudes and percept ions. Research
evidence supporting t he model is summarized and the conditions under which change
might be facilitated are described. The development a nd presentation of this model initiated
a series of professional collaborations between Michael an d myself, and led to the
development of ou r co-edited book, Professional Development in E ducation: new
paradigms and practices (Guskey & Huberman, 1995), which was named `Book of the
Year’ by the National Staff Development Council in 1996.
Introduction
High-quality professional development is a central component in nearly every
modern proposal for improving education. Policy-makers increasingly recognize
that schools can be no better than the teachers and administrators who work
within them. While these proposed professional development programs vary
widely in their content and format, most share a common purpose: to `alter the
professional practices, beliefs, and understanding of school persons toward an
articulated end (Grif® n, 1983, p. 2). In most cases, that end is the improvement of
student learning. Professional development programs are systematic efforts to
bring about change in the classroom practices of teachers, in their attitudes and
beliefs, and in the learning outcomes of students.
This article presents a perspective on the nature of these thre e areas of change
and the conditions under which they take place. It examines the order of occur-
rence of chang e events and how spec c types of change might be facilitated and
sustained. It proposes a model for viewing change in teachers in the hope of
clarifying aspects of that chang e process. In addition, the implications of this
model for the practice of professional development are co nsidered in light o f
current research.
Historical Context
Despite th e general acceptance of professional development as essential to im-
provement in education, reviews of professional developmen t research consist-
ISSN 1354-0602 (print)/ISSN 1470-1278 (online)/02/03/040381-11 Ó 2002 Taylor & Francis Ltd
DOI: 10.1080/13540600210000051 2
382 T. R. Guskey
ently point out the ineffectiveness of most programs (see Cohen & Hill, 1998, 2000;
Kennedy, 1998; Wang et al., 1999). A variety of factors undoubtedly contribute to
this ineffectiveness. It has been suggested, however, that the majority of programs
fail because they do not take into account two crucial factors: (1) what motivates
teacher s to engage in professional development, and (2) the process by which
change in teachers typically occurs (Guskey, 1986).
Although teachers are generally require d to tak e part in professional develop-
ment by certi® cation or contractual agreements, most report that they engage in
these activities because they want to become better teachers. They see professional
development programs as among the most promising and most r eadily available
routes to growth on the job (Fullan, 1991, 1993)Ð not only as a way to combat
boredom and alienation, but also as a pathway to increased competence and
greater professional satisfaction (Huberman, 1995).
It is important to note that, for the vast majority of teachers, becoming a better
teacher means enhancing student learning outcomes. In an early study of teachers
perceptions of success, for example, Harootunian & Yargar (1980) found that,
`regardless of teaching level, most teachers de® ne their success in terms of their
pupils behaviors and activities, rather than in terms of themselves or other
criteria’ (p. 4). Other researchers since repo rt similar ® ndings (for example, Fullan,
1999; Fullan & Hargreaves, 1996).
What attracts teachers to professional development, therefore, is their belief that
it will expan d their knowledge and skills, co ntribute to their g rowth, and enhance
their effectiveness with students. But teachers also tend to be quite pragmatic.
What they hope to gain through professional development are spec c, concrete,
and practical ideas that directly relate to the day-to-day operation of their
classrooms (Fullan & Miles, 1992). Development programs that fail to address
these needs are unlikely to succeed.
A second important factor that many professional development programs fail to
consider is the process of teacher change. Professional development activities
frequently are designed to initiate change in teachers attitudes, beliefs, and
perceptions. Professional development leaders, for example, often attempt to
change teachers’ beliefs about certain aspects of teaching or the desirability of a
particular curriculum or instructional innovation. They presume that such
changes in teachers attitudes and beliefs will lead to spec c changes in their
classroom behaviors and practices, whic h in turn will result in improved student
learning.
This perspective on teacher change evolved largely from a model developed
by early change theorists such as Lewin (1935), who derived many of his ideas
about affecting change from psychotherapeutic models. More recent research on
teacher change indicates, however, that the assumptions of this model may be
inaccurate when considering pro fessional development programs for experience d
teacher s ( Huberman & Crandall, 1983; Huberman & Miles, 1984; Guskey &
Huberman, 1995). An alternative model that re-examines the process of teacher
change is needed to guide the creation of more effective professional development
programs.
Professional Development and Teacher Change 383
F
IG
. 1. A model of teache r change.
An Alternative Model
As stated earlier, the three major goals of professional development programs are
change in the classroom practices of teachers, change in their attitudes and beliefs,
and change in the learning outcomes of students . Of particular importance to
efforts to facilitate change, h owever, is the sequence in which these outcomes most
frequently occur.
The relationship among these outcomes is detailed and highly complex, and
numerous factors can snarl the change process (Fullan, 1991; Guskey & Sparks,
1996). Still, professional development programs are deliberate and purposeful
endeavors, and the changes a professional development leader wishes to bring
about can usually be well d ned (Grif® n. 1983). Although the relationship among
desired outcomes is reciprocal to some degree, efforts to facilitate change can and
should consider the order of outcomes most likely to result in desired change and
the endurance of that change (see Guskey, 2000).
Professional development programs based on the assumption that change in
attitudes and beliefs comes ® rst are typically designed to gain acceptance, co mmit-
ment, and enthusiasm from teachers and school administrators before the im-
plementation of new practices or strategies. They involve teachers in planning
sessions and conduct need surveys to ensure tha t the new practices or strategies
are well aligned with what teachers want (Joyce et al., 1976). But, as important as
these procedures are, they seldom chang e attitudes signi® cantl y or elicit strong
commitment from teachers (Jones & Hayes, 1980).
The `Model of Teacher Change’ shown in Fig. 1 presents an alternative ap-
proach. This model suggests a different sequence among the three major outcomes
of professional development. According to the model, signi® cant change in
teachers attitudes and beliefs occurs primarily after they gain evidence of im-
provements in student learning. These improvements typically result from
changes teachers have made in their classroom practicesÐ a new instructional
approach, the use of new materials or curricula, or simply a mod cation in
teaching procedures or classroom format.
The crucial point is that it is not the professional development per se, but the
experience of successful implementation that changes teachers attitudes and
beliefs. They believe it works because they have seen it work, and that experience
shapes their attitudes and beliefs. Thus, according to the model, the key element
384 T. R. Guskey
in sign cant change in teachers attitudes and beliefs is clear evidence of im-
provement in the learning outcomes of their students (Guskey, 1985, 1986, 1989).
This model of change is predicated on the idea that change is primarily an
experientially based learning process for teachers. Practices that are found to
workÐ that is, those tha t teachers ® nd useful in helping students attain desired
learning outcomesÐ are retained and repeated. Those that do not work or yield no
tangible evidence o f success are generally abandoned. Demonstrable results in
terms of student learning outcomes are the key to the endurance of any change in
instructional practice.
Attitudes and beliefs about teaching in general are also largely derived from
classroom experience. Teachers who have been consistently unsuccessful in help-
ing students from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds to attain a hig h
standard of learning, for example, are likely to believe t hese students are in-
capable of academic excellence. If, however, those teachers try a new instructional
strategy and succeed in helping such students learn, their beliefs are likely to
change. Again, the po int is that evidence of improvement or positive change in the
learning outcomes of students generally precedes, and may be a pre-requisite to,
signi® can t change in the attitudes and beliefs of most teachers.
Learning outcomes are broadly construed in the model to include not only
cognitive and achievement indices, but also the wide range of s tudent behavior
and attitudes. They can include students ’ scores on teacher-made quizzes and
examinations, as well as results from standardized assessments and achievement
tests. But they can also include students’ attendance, their involvement in class
sessions, their classroom behavior, their motivation for learning, and their atti-
tudes toward sch ool, the class, and themselves. In other words, learning outcomes
include whatever kinds of evidence teachers us e to judge the effectiveness of their
teaching.
Support for the M odel
Support for this Model of Teacher C hange comes from many sources. Ethno-
graphic studies of teacher change show, for instance, that new ideas and princi-
ples about teaching are believed to be true by teachers `when they give rise to
actions that work (B olster, 1983, p. 298) . This research demonstrates that experi-
enced teachers seldom become committed to a new instructional approach or
innovation until they have seen it work in their classrooms with their students.
The Study of Dissemination Efforts Supporting School Improvements (Crandall
et al., 1982) offers additional support. This study examined efforts to implement 61
innovative practices in schools and classrooms in 146 districts nationwide. Of
particular interest to Crandall and his associates was the development of teachers
commitment to the new practices. In several instances, they found project man-
agers tried to stimulate teachers commitment to the new practices by involving
them in problem-solving and decision-making prior to implementation. But, in
most cases , this was discovered to have deleterious effects. The new practices
Professional Development and Teacher Change 385
typically lost their effectiveness because they were altered by teachers beyond
recognition.
In successful improvement efforts, on the contrary, teacher commitment was
found to dev elo p primarily after implementation took place. That is, teachers
became committed to the new practices only after they had actively engaged in
using them in their classrooms (Crandall, 1983). Again, th is supports the idea that
change in teachers’ attitudes takes place primarily after some change in student
learning has been evidenced.
Another example is Huberm ans (1981) case study of one school district’s efforts
to implement the Exemplary Center for Reading Instruction (ECRI) program.
According to Huberman, the ® rst six months of program implementation were
characterized by high anxiety and confusion among most teachers. Then came a
period in which anxiety was reduced but teachers continued to have problems
relating spec c teaching behaviors to the underlying rationale of the new pro-
gram. After six more months, the majority of teachers had cognitively mastered
the individual pieces of ECRI, bu t still had `little sense of integration of separate
parts or, more globally, why certain skills or exercises are related to spec c
outcomes. Concern for understanding the structure and rationale of the program
grew as behavioral mastery over its parts was achieved (Huberman, 1981, p. 91) .
Thus, as Fullan (1985) notes in his summar y of this study, changes in attitudes,
beliefs, and understanding generally followed, rather than preceded, changes in
behavior.
Still further su pport comes from studies of the separate effects of professional
development and the use of new instructional practices on teachers attitudes and
beliefs (Guskey, 1979, 1982; Huberma n & Miles, 1984). One particular investiga-
tio n (Guskey, 1984) involved a large-scale professional development effort that
focused on the implementation of mastery learning (Bloom, 1968; Guskey, 1997).
Following initial training, most of the participating teachers used the mastery
learning procedures in their classes and saw improvements in student learning. A
few teachers, however, used the new procedures but noted no impro vements.
Several others took part in the training but never tried the procedures in their
classes.
Results from affective measures showed that teachers who saw improvements
liked teaching more and believed they had a more powerful in¯ uence on student
learning outcomes. Similar changes did not occur among teachers who used the
new procedures bu t saw no improvements in student learning, or among those
who took part in the training but never attempted implementation. Thus, neither
training alone nor training followed by implementation was suf® cient fo r affective
change. These particular attitude and belief changes occurred only when training
and implementation were combine d with evidence of improved student learning.
In some ways , this Model of Teacher Change overly simpli® es a highly complex
process, and exceptions to the model certainly exist. For example, participants
attitudes must at least change fr om `cynical to `skeptical for any change in
practice to occur. Furthermore, the process of teacher change is probably more
cyclical than linear (Huberman, 1992, 1995). In ot her words, changes in attitudes
386 T. R. Guskey
and beliefs are likely to spur additional changes in practice that bring further
change in student learning, and so on (Huberman, 1983, 1985). Still, the consist-
ency of the results from diverse studies makes a strong case for the proposed
model.
A Similar M odel
Striking similarity exists betw een the sequence of change events s uggested by this
model and a change model proposed over 100 years ago to describe the temporal
relationship between emotion and behavioral response. The psychologist William
James (1890) theorized that the important factor in an emotion is feedback from
the bodily changes that occur in response to a particular situation. His theory
seemed to co ict with commonly held notions about emotion and human
behavior. Simply stated, James suggested that we see a bear and run, therefore we
are afraid. Or, if we slip while descending a staircase, we grab for the railing ® rst,
and then sense the fear of our near fall. This theory was also proposed by the
Danish physiologist Carl Lange and is generally known as the James± Lange
theory.
Similarly, the Model of Teacher Change outlined here might seem to co ict
with commonly held notions about the nature of educational change. The model
implies that change in teachers attitudes and beliefs is primarily a result, rather
than a cause, of change in the learning outcomes of students. In the absence of
evidence of positive change in students’ learning, it suggests that signi® cant
change in the attitudes and beliefs of teachers is unlikely.
Implications for Professional Development
Assuming that this Model of Teacher Change is accurate, what are its implications
for professional development? The following three principles st em from the
model. Consideration of these pr inciples is believed to be essential in planning
effective professional development programs that result in signi® cant and sus-
tained educational improvements.
Recognize that Change is a Gradual and Dif® cult Process for Teachers
Learning to be pro® cient at something new and ® nding meaning in a new way of
doing things requires both time and effort. Any change that hold s great promise
for increasing teachers competence and enhancing student learning is likely to
require extra work, especially at ® rst. The requirements of extra energy and time
can signi® cantly add to teachers workload, even when release time is provided.
Furthermore, change brings a certain amount of anxiety and can he very
threatening. Like practitioners in many other ® elds, teachers ar e reluctant to adopt
new practices or procedures unless they feel sure they can make them w ork
(Lortie, 1975). To change or to try something new means to risk failure. Not only
would this be highly embarrassing, but it also runs counter to most teachers
Professional Development and Teacher Change 387
strong commitment to student learning. To change means to chance the possibility
that students might learn less well than they do under current practices. There-
fore, even when presente d with evidence from the most carefully designed
experimental studies, teachers do not easily alter or discard the practices they
have developed and re® ned in the demanding environment of their own class-
rooms (Bolster, 1983).
It is also important to recognize that no new program or innovation will be
implemented uniformly. Teaching and learning are in¯ uenced by a multitude of
situational and contextual variables (Huberman & Miles, 1984; Fullan, 1985;
Firestone & Corbett, 1987). Reforms based on assumptions of uniformity in the
educational system repeatedly fail (Elmore & McLaughlin , 1988). Hence, an
appropriate balance must be struck between program ® delity and mutual adap-
tation considerations (Grif® n & Barnes, 1984). Close co llaboration between pro-
gram developers/researchers and teachers can greatly facilitate this process and
can be accomplished in a variety of ways (Ward & Tikinoff, 1982).
Ensure that Teachers Receive Regular Feedback on Student Learning Progress
If the use of new practices is to be sustained and changes are to endure , the
individuals involved need to receive regular feedback on the effects of thei r
efforts. It is wel l known that successful actions are reinforcing and lik ely to be
repeated while those that are unsuccessful tend to be diminished. Similarly,
practices that are new and u nfamiliar will be accepted and retained when they are
perceived as increasing one’s competence and effectiveness . This is especially true
of teachers, whose primary psychic rewards come from feeling certain about their
capacity to affect student growth and development (Bredeson et al., 1983; Guskey,
1989; Huberman, 1992). New practices are likely to be abandoned, however, in the
absence of any evidence of their positive effects. Hence, speci® c procedures to
provide feedback on results are essential to the success of any professional
development effort.
In programs involving the implementation of mastery learning, for example,
teacher s receive this type of feedback through the regular administration of
`formative assessments’ (Bloom et al., 1981). These assessments are used in mas-
tery learning primarily to give students detailed information on their learning
progress. They are paired with corrective activ ities designed to help students
remedy their learning errors .
In addition to the feedback formative assessments offer students, however, they
also offer teachers speci® c feedback on the effectiveness of their use of the mastery
learning process. They provide teachers with direct evid ence of the results of their
efforts and illustrate precisely the improvements made in students’ learning.
Formative assessments can also be used to guide instructional revisions, when
necessary, to increase teacher effectiveness (Guskey, 1997).
Students scores on quizzes and class ass essment are not the only type of
feedback indicative of successful learning outcomes. Stallings (1980) found that
providing teachers with regular feedback on student involvement during class
388 T. R. Guskey
sessions could be very powerful in facilitating their use of new instructional
practices. Giving teachers evidence on students’ feelings of co dence or self -
worth can also serve this purpose (Dolan, 1980). Whatever the student learning
outcome considered, it is vitally important to include some procedure by which
teacher s can receive regular feedback on that outcome to assess the effects of their
efforts. When teachers gain this evidence and see that a new program or inno-
vation works wel l in their classrooms, change in their attitudes and beliefs can and
will follow.
Provide Continued Follow-Up, Support and Pressur e
If change in teachers attitudes and beliefs occurred primarily before implemen-
tation of a new program or innovation, th e quality of the initial training would be
crucial. But since, as the model suggests, such change occurs mainly after im-
plementation takes place and there is evidence of improved student learning,
continued follow-up, support, and pressure following the initial training that is
even more crucial.
Support coupled with pressure is essential for continuing educational improve-
ment. Support allows those engaged in th e dif® cult process of implementation to
tolerate the anxiety of occasional failures. Pressure is often necessary to initiate
change among those whose self-impetus for change is not great (Airasian, 1987;
Huberman & Crandall, 1983), and it provides the encouragement, motivation, and
occasional nudging that many practitioners require to persist in the challenging
tasks tha t are intrinsic to all change efforts.
If a new program or innovation is to be implemented well, it must become a
natural part of teachers repertoire of teaching skills. Especially for program
continuation and expansion, teachers must come to use the new practices almost
out of habit. If this is to occur, continued follow-up and support are essential.
Of all aspects of professional development, sustaining change is perhaps the
most neglected. It is clear that, to be successful, professional development must be
seen as a process, not an event (Loucks-Horsley et al., 1987, 1998). Learning to be
pro® cient at something new or ® nding meaning in a new way of doing things is
dif® cult and sometimes painful. Furthermore, any change that holds great prom-
ise for increasing individuals competence or enhancing an organizations effec-
tiveness is likely to be slow and require extra work (Huberman & Miles, 1984). It
is imperative, therefore, that improvement be seen as a continuous and ongoing
endeavor (McLaughlin & Marsh, 1978).
Future Research
The model of teacher change outlined in this article presents a variety of opportu-
nities for future research. In particular, it will hopefully stimulate renewed interest
in the various components of the change process, the nature of the relationship
between components, and the transition from one component to the next.
Professional Development and Teacher Change 389
For example, we need to ® nd more creative ways to hel p teachers translate new
knowledge into practice, keeping in min d the problems related to `working on’
rather the n `working with teachers (Ward & Tikinoff, 1976). We nee d better and
more ef® cient methods of providing teachers with regular feedback on the
learning progress of their students. We need to explore the spec c teacher
attitudes and beliefs most crucial to professional g rowth and development, and to
® nd better ways of measuring these variables. Studies on these issues offer
exciting possibilities. The ® ndings are likely to have implications for professional
development efforts at all levels of education.
The model discussed offers a very optimistic perspective on the potential of
professional development. It illustrates that, although the process of teacher
change through professional development is complex, it is not haphazard. C areful
attention to the order of change events described in this model is lik ely not only
to facilitate change-making, but also to contribute to the endurance of change. As
a result, professional development programs will be far more effective and much
more powerful.
References
A
IRASIAN
, P. W. (1987) State mandated testing and educ ational reform: context and conse-
quences, American Journal of Education, 95, pp. 393± 412 .
B
LOOM
, B. S. (1968) Learning for mastery, Evaluation Comment, 1(2), pp. 12.
B
LOOM
, B. S., M
ADAUS
, G. F. & H
ASTINGS
, J. T. (1981) Evaluation to Improve Learning (New York,
McGraw-Hill).
B
OLSTER
, A. S. (1983) Toward a mor e effective model of research on teaching, Harvard
Educational Review, 53, pp. 294± 308.
B
REDESON
, P. V., F
RUTH
, M. J. & K
ASTEN
, K. L. (1983) Organizational incentives and secondary
school teaching, Journal or Research and Development in Education, 16(1), pp. 24± 42.
C
OHEN
, D. K. & H
ILL
, H. C. (1998) State policy and classroom performance: mathematics reform
in California, CPRE Policy Bri efs (RB-23-May) (Philadelphia, PA, Consortiu m for Policy
Research in Education (CPRE), Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylva-
nia).
C
OHEN
, D. K. & H
ILL
, H. C. (2000) Instructional policy and classroom performance: the math-
ematics ref orm in California, Teachers College Record, 102(2), pp. 294± 343.
C
RANDALL
, D. P. (1983) The teacher’s role in school improvement, Educational Leadership, 41(3),
pp. 6± 9.
C
RANDALL
, D. P. , L
OUCKS
-H
ORSLEY
, S., B
AUCHNER
, J. E., S
CHMIDT
, W. B., E
ISEMAN
, J. W., C
OX
, P. L.,
M
ILES
, M. B., H
UBERMAN
, A. M., T
AYLOR
, B. L., G
OLDBERG
, J. A., S
HIVE
, G., T
HOMPSON
, C. L. &
T
AYLOR
, J. A. (1982) People, Policies, and Practices: examining the chai n of school improvement
(Andover, MA, The NETWORK, Inc.).
D
OLAN
, L. J. (1980) The affective correlates of home support, instructional quality, and
achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, IL.
E
LMORE
, R. F. & M
C
L
AUGHLIN
, M. W. (1988) Steady work: policy, practice, and reform in
American education, R-3574-NIE/RC (Santa Monica, CA, Ran d Corporation).
F
IRESTONE
, W. & C
ORBETT
, H. D. (1987 ) Planned organizational change, in: N. B
OYAND
(Ed.)
Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (pp. 321± 340) (New York, Longman).
F
ULLAN
, M. (1985) Change processes and strategies at the local level, Elementary School Journal,
85, pp. 391± 421.
F
ULLAN
, M. G. (1991) The New Meaning of Educational Change (New York, Teachers College
Press).
390 T. R. Guskey
F
ULLAN
, M. G. (1993) Change Forces: probing the depths of educational reform (Bristol, PA, Falmer
Press).
F
ULLAN
, M. G. (1999) Change Forces: the sequel (Bristol, PA, Falmer Press).
F
ULLAN
, M. G. & H
ARGREAVES
, A. (1996) What’s Worth Fighting for in Your School (New York,
Teachers College Press).
F
ULLAN
, M. G. & M
ILES
, M. B. (1992) Getting reform right: what works and what doesn’t, Phi
Delta Kappan, 73(10), pp. 745± 752.
G
RIFFIN
, G. A. (1983) Introduction: the work of staff development, in: G. A. G
RIFFIN
(Ed.) Staff
Development, Eighty-Second Yearbook o f the Nat ional Society for the Stud y of Education
(Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
G
RIFFIN
, G. A. & B
ARNES
, S. (1984) School change: a craft-derived and research-based strategy,
Teachers College Record, 86(1), pp. 103± 123.
G
USKEY
, T. R. (1979) Inservice education, classroom results, and teacher change. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, IL.
G
USKEY
, T. R. (1982) The effects of change in instructional effectiveness upon the relationship
of teacher expectations and student achievement, Journal of Educational Research, 75(6),
pp. 345± 349.
G
USKEY
, T. R. (1984) The in¯ uence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective
characteristics of teachers, American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), pp. 245± 259.
G
USKEY
, T. R. (1985) Staff development and teacher change, Educational Leadership, 42(7),
pp. 5 60.
G
USKEY
, T. R. (1986) Staff development an d the process of teache r change, Educational Researcher,
15(5), pp. 12.
G
USKEY
, T. R. (1989) Attitude and perceptual change in teachers, International Journal of
Educational Research, 13(4), pp. 439± 453.
G
USKEY
, T. R. (1997) Implementing Mastery Learning, 2nd ed n (Belmont, CA, Wadsworth
Publishing Company).
G
USKEY
, T. R. (2000) Evaluating Professional Development (Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press).
G
USKEY
, T. R. & H
UBERMAN
, M. (1995) Professional Development in Education: new paradigms and
practices (New York, Teachers College Press).
G
USKEY
, T. R. & S
PARKS
, D. (1996) Exploring the relationship between staff development and
improvements in student learning, Journal of Staff Development, 17(4), pp. 34± 38.
H
AROOTUNIAN
. B. & Y
ARGAR
, G. P. (1980) Teachers’ conceptions of their own success. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Edu cational Research Association,
Boston, MA, April.
H
UBERMAN
, M. (1981) ECRI, Masepa, North Plains: a case study (Andover, MA, The NETWORK,
Inc.).
H
UBERMAN
, M. (1983) Recipes for busy teachers, Knowledge: creation, diffusion, utilization, 4,
pp. 478± 510.
H
UBERMAN
, M. (1985) What knowledge is of most worth to teachers? A knowledge-use
perspective, Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, pp. 251± 262.
H
UBERMAN
, M. (1992) Teacher development and instructional mastery, in: A. H
ARGREAVES
&
M. G. F
ULLAN
(Eds) Understand Teacher Development (pp. 122 ± 142 ) (New York, Teachers
College Press).
H
UBERMAN
, M. (1995) Professional careers and professional development: some intersections, in:
T. R. G
USKEY
& M. H
UBERMAN
(Eds) Professional Development in Education: new paradigms
and practices (pp. 193± 224) (New York, Teachers College Press).
H
UBERMAN
, M. & C
RANDALL
, D. (1983) People, Policies and Practice: examining the chain of school
improvement, Vol. 9, Implications for Action: a study of dissemination efforts supporting school
improvement (Andover, MA, The NETWORK Inc.).
H
UBERMAN
, M. & M
ILES
, M. B. (1984) Innovation Up Close: how school improvement works (New
York, Plenum).
J
AMES
, W. (1890) The Principles of Psychology (New York, Holt).
Professional Development and Teacher Change 391
J
ONES
, L. L. & H
AYES
, A. E. (1980) How valid are surveys of teacher needs, Educational Leadership,
37, pp. 390± 392.
J
OYCE
, B. R., M
CNAIR
, K. M., D
IAZ
, R. & M
CKIBBIN
, M. D. (1976) Interviews: perceptions of professionals
and policy makers (Stanford, CA, Stanford Center for Research and Development in
Teaching, Stanford University).
K
ENNEDY
, M. (1998) Form and substance in teacher inservice educ ation, Research Monograph No.
13 (Madison, WI, National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin±
Madison).
L
EWIN
, K. (1935) A Dynamic Theory of Personality (New York, McGraw Hill).
L
ORTIE
, D. C. (1975) Schoolteacher: a sociological study (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
L
OUCKS
-H
ORSLEY
, S., H
ARDING
, C. K., A
RBUCKLE
, M. A., M
URRAY
, L. B., D
UBEA
, C. & W
ILLIAMS
, M. K.
(1987) Continuin g to Learn: a guidebook for teacher development (Andover, MA, Regional
Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast & Islands).
L
OUCKS
-H
ORSLEY
, S., H
EWSON
, P., L
OVE
, N. & S
TILES
, K. E. (1998) Designing Professional Development
for Teacher s of Science and Mathematics (Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin).
M
CLAUGHLIN
, M. W. & M
ARSH
, D. D. (1978) Staff development and school change, Teachers
College Record, 40, pp. 69± 93.
S
TALLINGS
, J. (1980) Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task,
Educational Researcher, 9(11), pp. 11± 16.
W
ANG
, Y. L., F
RECHTLING
, J. A. & S
ANDERS
, W. L. (1999) Exploring linkages be tween professional
development and student learning: a pilot study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of
the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April 1999.
W
ARD
, B. A. & T
IKINOFF
, W. J. (1976) An Interactive Model of Research and Development in Teaching,
Report 76± 1 (San Francisco, CA, Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and
Development).
W
ARD
, B. A. & T
IKINOFF
, W. J. (1982) Collaborative Research: implications of research for practice
(Washington, DC, National Institute of Education).
... There was an almost unanimous expression of the need for inclusion of teachers in decision-making processes, as well as their support throughout the implementation of new future-oriented teaching strategies. This observation shows that policymakers were aware that change in educational practice is often difficult and complex (Guskey, 2002) given that when new policies on curriculum, instruction, and assessment are introduced, teachers play a key role in transforming such policies for implementation in their classrooms (van der Heijden et al., 2018). There is substantial amount of research on how teachers engage with educational policy, ranging from rejection to assimilation of new policies (Cotton, 2006) depending on their educational philosophy, the context of their schools and their professional goals (Ryder et al., 2018). ...
Article
The rapid changes in science and society during the last decade have demonstrated the need for readiness to address the uncertain future through the development of future-oriented skills. Despite previous attempts, there is still no consensus regarding what is meant by “future-oriented skills” and how these could be integrated into science curricula. Stakeholders’ views about what future-oriented skills are and how they should be taught would provide a clearer understanding of their needs and their perceived characteristics of effective new teaching approaches. Thus, given the pivotal role that policymakers play in education policies, this study investigated the views of 35 policymakers based in the United Kingdom, Italy, Finland, and Lithuania. Participants completed an online survey that elicited their views on future-oriented skills, as well as ways of integrating them into national science curricula. The data analysis included descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis based on the principles of thematic analysis. The qualitative analysis followed a combination of inductive and deductive coding approaches. The findings of this study highlight that among other skills, participants stressed the need for introducing problem-solving and critical thinking in science classrooms in order to better address the uncertainty of future challenges, such as environmental issues. Therefore, policymakers seem to agree that there is a need for moving away from traditional teacher-centred approaches when teaching future-oriented skills. These results provide valuable insights into policymakers’ needs and expectations. In doing so, this study can serve as a starting point for a systematic approach toward integrating future-oriented skills into science curricula.
... Accordingly, teachers are key players in the development of universities, laying the foundation for talent cultivation and an improved quality of education. In addition, teachers are also of crucial importance to the success of reform initiatives, as they are ultimately the ones responsible for enacting these initiatives within the classroom (Guskey, 2002). Consequently, the promotion of teachers' professional development is an important matter for their personal growth and the sustainable development of universities. ...
Article
Full-text available
The professional development of teachers is fundamental to educational reform and promotion, and such a development includes teachers' aesthetic experiences. This study aims to explore the impact of Chinese teachers' aesthetic experiences on their professional development and the differences between male and female teachers in terms of the impact of aesthetic experiences on professional development. In total, 500 teachers from 20 universities in Hainan and Guangzhou, China, were surveyed, and 488 valid questionnaires were collected. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to examine the impact of each variable. The results of the study indicate that "aesthetic attitude," "understanding of beauty," and "full experience" all have a significantly positive impact on the professional development of both male and female teachers, whereas "pleasure of beauty" has no significant impact on teachers' professional development. The findings also demonstrate that no difference exists between male and female teachers in terms of the impact of aesthetic experiences on professional development, and the more practical conceptions of aesthetic experience have a direct impact on teachers' development.
... To promote secondary mathematics teachers' effective use of VMs (i.e., to teach with technology), the design of this PD was based on evidence-based decisions. Research investigating technology focused PD opportunities for in-service teachers (e.g., Bicer & Capraro, 2016;Driskell et al., 2016;Martin et al., 2010;Matzen & Edmunds, 2007;Walker et al., 2012;Yamagata-Lynch, 2003) and components of effective PD (e.g., Borko, 2004;Guskey, 2002;Penuel, Fishman, Yamaguchi, & Gallagher, 2007;Webster-Wright, 2009) was reviewed. Drawing from similarities across the field, the following core components for effective PD guided the design of this PD (e.g., see Desimone, 2009): content focus (mathematics), active learning (teachers used and then critiqued tasks to be used in their classrooms), coherence (with the district/school goals to use technology to transform teaching and learning), duration (20 hours distributed across the school year), and collective participation to build a learning community among a group of teachers implementing the same curriculum (i.e., teaching pairs from the same schools). ...
... In fact, PD is rarely designed or customized based on teaching beliefs, experiences, and everyday teaching practices, potentially leading to ineffective outcomes (Guskey, 2002). Responding to this challenge, Bae et al. (2020) utilized latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify different types of middle-school science teachers (n = 101) based on their teaching knowledge and motivation. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study is framed by Bandura’s social cognitive theory and Dewey’s idea of habits and investigates types of science teachers based on four constructs: (a) self-efficacy beliefs, (b) twenty-first-century learning attitudes, (c) the frequency of implementing inquiry-based instruction, and (d) the frequency of using technology in teaching. K-means clustering analysis was run on a sample of 837 US elementary and secondary science teachers. Multinomial logistic regression was then used to characterize each group using variables such as years of teaching experience, National Board Certification (NBC) status, gender, grade-level taught, school location, STEM career awareness, and leadership attitudes. We found four science teacher groups and named them the idealist, moderate, reform-minded, and generalist. Further analyses revealed that gender and geographic location did not significantly influence cluster membership. However, we found that clustering was significantly associated with NBC status, grade-level taught, years of teaching experience, STEM career awareness, and leadership attitudes. Notably, the reform-minded science teachers were more likely to hold an NBC status, teach secondary science, and have a high awareness of current STEM careers. Moreover, the generalist science teachers were those teaching elementary levels and without NBC status. These findings inform the design of tailored professional development programs targeting specific science-teacher characteristics.
... Therefore, one of the main elements of teachers' professional development should be to bring a version of academic awareness to science teachers. One of the most influential ways of involving a teacher in a professional development program where in-class questioning technics are centralized is to persuade teachers that change in questioning tactics may have higher impacts on student talk productivity (Cochran-Smith 2005Guskey, 2002). As teacher educators agree, the professional changes of teachers have a sequence as follows: teachers develop in terms of, for instance, questioning strategies described above, students develop cognitively, and teachers witness the students' intellectual development, teachers believe in the effectiveness of enacting certain types of questions (Orland-Barak & Wand, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
It is still less known how teachers organize classroom dialog to foster intellectual contributions to classroom talks. The current study developed a coding scheme to clarify science teacher questions and identify how different questions affect students’ talk productivity. The participants were 28 fifth-grade students and a science teacher who conducted argument-based implementations. The verbatim transcriptions were analyzed through a systematic observation approach. The teacher elaborated on the students’ background reasoning in a metacognitive learning setting. In addition, the teacher assigned the students as co-evaluators of the credibility of the presented ideas. The teacher invited the students to re-consider their ideas’ explanatory power by displaying discrepant questions. Moreover, the students had to propose justified claims once they were requested to support their propositions with ample and proper data. The teacher used his questions to guide the students to handle basic process skills and make inferences regarding natural phenomena under consideration. The legitimating, discrepant, and justified talk questions fostered the students’ talk productivity than the eliciting, metatalk, process skills, and inference questions. Recommendations are offered around the teacher noticing term regarding the relationship between questions asked in science classrooms and students’ talk productivity.
... Likewise, Evans (2011) contended that the purpose of TPD programs is to change teachers' professional thinking, knowing, feeling, and doing. It has also been regarded as an opportunity to cause teachers' pedagogical change, positive professional growth, and support their personal and socio-emotional development (Guskey, 2002;Borg, 2018;Rodriguez et al., 2020). It is essential to teachers' ability to cope with educational innovation and manage various socioeconomic affairs internal and external to the school (Omar, 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Teachers as the most important elements of education constantly need professional development (PD) courses in order to improve their pedagogy and practice. Given this, many educational systems worldwide have paid special attention to designing courses by which the quality of teaching and learning raises considerably. This surge of interest has ended in different studies on PD programs in L2 education. However, the pertinent literature lacks a comprehensive review of the models, applications, and impacts of EFL/ESL teachers' PD and various aspects influenced by this construct. To fill this gap and add fresh insights into this strand of research, the present study aimed to review the definitions, characteristics, models, goals, and uses of teacher professional development (TPD) in L2 education. Moreover, several empirical studies were touched on to support the claims of TPD impact on teachers. Finally, the study presented different implications for L2 teachers, teacher trainers, researchers, and policy-makers who can realize the significance and impact of effective TPD courses on the whole process of teaching and learning.
... The findings of this study are in congruence with Guskey's model of teacher change (Guskey, 2002). This model suggests that sustainable change in teacher practices may occur after teachers' beliefs and attitudes have gone through significant transformation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs play a vital role in the process of teaching and learning. These beliefs are often reflected in their practices which lead to the formation of their instructional decision making. Pre-service teacher education programs are offered in many universities of Pakistan with the aim to prepare professional teachers with strong beliefs in the value of teaching profession. Therefore, this qualitative case study aimed to explore the transformation of pre-service prospective teachers’ beliefs regarding teaching skills during a Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) program in the context of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP). The data were collected from eight participants through semi-structured interviews in two phases: before teaching practice and after teaching practice. Findings revealed that pre-service teachers joined B.Ed.program with certain traditional beliefs about teaching skills that were rooted in their past experiences as students. The transformation of those beliefs took place at the time of teaching practice in a real classroom. The paper concludes that only coursework of pre-service teacher education might not be sufficient to transform prospective teachers’ beliefs, rather the teaching practice should be a contributory factor in transforming their pedagogical beliefs. This could mainly be attributed to the prospective teachers’ practical experiences in real classroom situations during the teaching practice. The study has important implications for teacher educators and educational researchers in terms of highlighting the important role of teaching practice in the professional preparation and development of prospective teachers.
Chapter
In recent years, the government has launched an ambitious and wide-ranging series of economic, political and governance reforms that are impacting all aspects of Myanmar society. To improve the quality of education, professional development of teachers is very essential and changes in classroom practices demanded by the reforms ultimately rely on teachers (Fullan & Miles, 1992). So, the aim of the presentation is to investigate what are the main characteristics of teachers’ collaborative learning and how it can be enhanced for their professional development in schools. The data of this presentation is based on the responses of the interviews with five school teachers who were selected by purposive sampling because this presentation focuses on the perceptions of teachers on collaboration and professional development who have different teaching services working in different schools (primary schools and high schools from urban and rural areas in Yangon Division, Myanmar). Findings show that teachers perceived that collaborative learning can develop professional development, and they can discuss and share different ideas and perspectives and this kind of learning can improve their knowledge. They learned together in their school mostly from informal discussions. Teachers perceived that some trainings for professional development of teachers given by Ministry of Education are effective. The principal takes main role in school decision-making in some schools and the shared leadership is given to teachers in some schools. Moreover, issues such as over workload, time, too much concentration on school pass rate, isolation among teachers for professional talk, inequality of student–teacher ratio, weakness of shared decision-making and motivation and support from principals have also emerged from the data.
Chapter
The concept of change includes a variety of topics, situations, disciplines, dimensions, and aspects. Its diversity and impact on individuals and organizations has led to an array of definitions, models, and theories. Thus, changes constitute a response to values, transformations that are interpreted as opportunities to improve an organization’s resilience and increase its achievements. This chapter will further discuss the concept of change, leading to a deep analysis of teachers’ moral and ethical role in one of the most impactful changes in schools: the technological revolution. If teachers believe that change is necessary, they will make great efforts to implement it effectively both in class and at school. International examples will be shown (e.g., Israel, USA, UK, and Turkey), and conclusions will be drawn regarding the need to specifically train teachers to raise their ICT awareness and understand the drawbacks and risks of technology in the twenty-first century. Schools’ transformation in information and communication is not just a technological revolution but also a social and ethical change that involves teachers in a complex weave of technologies, its creators and users, their interactions, and the social context.
Article
Educational reformers increasingly seek to manipulate policies regarding assessment, curriculum, and professional development in order to improve instruction. They assume that manipulating these elements of instructional policy will change teachers' practice, which will then improve student performance. We formalize these ideas into a rudimentary model of the relations among instructional policy, teaching, and learning. We propose that successful instructional policies are themselves instructional in nature: because teachers figure as a key connection between policy and practice, their opportunities to learn about and from policy are a crucial influence both on their practice, and, at least indirectly, on student achievement. Using data from a 1994 survey of California elementary school teachers and 1994 student California Learning Assessment System (CLAS) scores, we examine the influence of assessment, curriculum, and professional development on teacher practice and student achievement. Our results bear out the usefulness of the model: under circumstances that we identify, policy can affect practice, and both can affect student performance.
Article
This study was designed to assess the influence of positive change in instructional effectiveness on several affective characteristics of teachers. Data were gathered from 117 intermediate and high school teachers, 52 of whom participated in an in-service workshop on Mastery Learning. Comparisons made through MANOVA procedures showed that those teachers who experienced positive change in the learning outcomes of their students expressed increased personal responsibility for both positive and negative student outcomes, increased affect toward teaching, but decreased confidence in their teaching abilities. Implications regarding the alterability of these teacher characteristics are discussed.