ArticlePDF Available

More than a number: Clarifying the dates of publication of some papers of A. Doering on land and freshwater shells from Argentina and a note on his taxon Clessinia (Odontostomidae)

Authors:
  • National Scientific and Technical Research Council -Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia

Abstract

The dates of publication of ten papers of A. Doering published from 1874–1879 in two Argentinan journals are reviewed. Seven of these papers appear to have been published later than their printed dates suggest. The status of one taxon described in these papers, Clessinia Doering, 1875, is clarified.
18 Accepted by J. Nekola: 24 Oct. 2012; published: 5 Dec. 2012
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ISSN
1175-5334 (online edition)
Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press
Zootaxa 3572: 1822 (2012)
www.mapress.com
/zootaxa/
Correspondence
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:01C424C9-C9F1-4E1F-A381-0033B5B70698
More than a number: clarifying the dates of publication of some papers of A.
Doering on land and freshwater shells from Argentina and a note on his taxon
Clessinia (Odontostomidae)
ABRAHAM S.H. BREURE
1,*
& SERGIO E. MIQUEL
2
1
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands
2
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, 1405 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires,
Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
*Corresponding author: ashbreure@gmail.com.
Abstract
The dates of publication of ten papers of A. Doering published from 1874–1879 in two Argentinan journals are reviewed.
Seven of these papers appear to have been published later than their printed dates suggest. The status of one taxon
described in these papers, Clessinia Doering, 1875, is clarified.
Keywords: Mollusca, Gastropoda, Orthalicoidea, nomenclature, prioritization
Introduction
One of the cornerstones in zoological nomenclature is the Rule of Priority (Art. 23.1 ICZN (1999)): “The valid name of a taxon
is the oldest available name applied to it”). Therefore the date of publication is an important tool for application of this rule, for
which Art. 21 gives further guidelines. The dates of publication of older taxonomic works from the 19
th
century have
sometimes been especially disputed, and reconstructions often have to be based on research in libraries resulting in collations
for e.g. serial works (examples in malacology e.g. Coan et al. 2012a, 2012b). Much less attention, however, has been given to
the publication dates of journals (but see e.g. Winckworth 1936, Duncan 1937, Raphael 1970, Evenhuis 2003). A new date for
a publication may lead to a different prioritization of names, and thus a date can be more than just a number.
Adolfo Doering (1848–1926) published in two Argentinan journals a number of papers with notes and descriptions
of new land and freshwater Mollusca from that country; these papers appeared between 1874 and 1879 (for a note on
biography and bibliography of Doering, see Parodiz 1963). Of a selected number of these papers, however, different
publication dates and pagination are cited in literature (Parodiz 1963, Zilch 1971, Neubert & Janssen 2004, Miquel et al.
2007, Miquel & Aguirre 2011, Pizá & Cazzaniga 2012). The aim of this paper is to discuss the publication dates of these
selected Doering papers and present some new evidence found. The possible effect on prioritization is illustrated with the
case of Doering’s taxon Clessinia.
Two journals, one history
The two Argentinan journals in which Doering published his malacological papers were the ‘Boletín de la Academia
Nacional de Ciencias Exactas en Córdoba’ (BANC) and the ‘Periódico Zoológico’ (PZ). The complex history of the
latter journal during the 1870s has recently been described by Acosta (2006). Both journals originated in Córdoba, where
the Academia de Ciencias Exactas de Córdoba had been initiated by law of 11.ix.1869, with several Germans in the
‘initial group’ of professors. The journal BANC was started in 1874, with an introduction signed by Doering on
15.iv.1874. The journal PZ was started in May 1874 by Hendrik Weyenbergh, who had been appointed Professor in
Zoology in August 1872, as journal of the ‘Sociedad Entomológica Argentina’. After the first two numbers the name of
the Society was changed to ‘Sociedad Zoológica Argentina’ to allow for a broader range of topics. Each volume
Zootaxa 3572 © 2012 Magnolia Press · 19
DOERING DATES
consisted of four issues, but due to the difficult political and economic situation at that time, these issues appeared
irregularly and each volume spanned more than one year. Moreover, during 1877–1880 several papers that appeared in
PZ were duplicated in BANC. Furthermore, the Doering papers that were published in both journals were not always
exactly the same (see below), adding to the confusion.
Doering’s papers
Doering published the following papers during the 1870s in BANC or PZ, while due to the circumstances above, two
papers—describing the same new taxa—were published in both journals; these papers are indicated by asterisks (* and **)
below.
Doering, A. (1874a) Apuntamientos sobre la fauna de moluscos de la República Argentina. Boletín de la Academia
Nacional de Ciencias Exactas en Córdoba, Buenos Aires, 1 (1), 48–77.
Remarks. Parodiz (1963: 4), Zilch (1971: 204), and Miquel & Aguirre (2011: 129) all have the date as 1874; it is not
disputed herein. Doering described four new taxa in this paper, after an introduction and annotated list of 85 species
known from Argentina. The new taxa should be dated 31 December 1874 according to Art. 21.3.2 ICZN. This paper is
available in BHL (http://www.biodiversityheritagelibrary.org/item/21794).
Doering, A. (1874b) Molluscorum terrestrium et fluviatilium fauna argentinae. Enumeration systematica. Periódico
Zoológico, 1 (2), 113–120.
Remarks. This is an abridged version of Doering 1874a, listing 89 species. The publication date 1874 follows Acosta
(2006: 18), who also gave details on the reprint of this issue with a different pagination. As Acosta has not presented a
specified date, this paper should also be dated 31 December 1874 according to Art. 21.3.2 ICZN. This paper is at present
not available in BHL.
Doering, A. (“1874” [1875a]) Estudios sistemáticos y anatómicos sobre los moluscos pulmoníferos de los países del
Plata. Periódico Zoológico, 1 (3), 129–204, Pl. 4.
Remarks. Zilch (1971: 205), Parodiz (1963: 4) and Miquel & Aguirre (2011: 129) cited this paper as 1875; Neubert
& Janssen (2004: 245), with reference to Taschenberg (1887: 174), argued that it possibly did not appear until 1877. This
seems illogical as Taschenberg (1887: 174) stated that volume 2 appeared in 1875; see also below. A date given in
another paper in the same issue (p. 236: comment about a storm on “14 de febrero 1875”) makes clear that volume 1
issue 3 may not have appeared in print before March 1875. On p. 335—following the last article in PZ 1 (4)—the
statement “imprimitur a.d. XIV Kal. May 1875” indicates that volume 1 was completed sometime in May 1875. We
therefore assume that issue PZ 1 (3) was most likely published between March and May 1875; following Art. 21.3.1
ICZN this paper has to be dated 31 May 1875.
This is a more extended version of Doering 1874a, with description of three new taxa (one at the genus-level and
two as new species). This paper is at present not available in BHL.
Doering, A. (“1874” [1875b]) Apuntes sobre la fauna de moluscos de la República Argentina (Segunda parte).
Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas en Córdoba, Buenos Aires, 1 (4), 424–457.
Doering, A. (“1874” [1875c]) Suplementos de la lista de moluscos terrestres y fluviales en el territorio del Río de la
Plata y de la República Argentina. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas en Córdova [Córdoba], Buenos
Aires, 1 (4), 457–460.
Remarks. These two papers—by some authors cited as one with pagination 424–459 (460 is a blank page)—were
cited by Zilch (1971: 204) as 1874. Neubert & Janssen (2004: 245) argued on the basis of secondary sources
(Taschenberg 1887: 174) this should be corrected to 1875; Parodiz (1963: 4), Miquel et al. (2007: 114) and Miquel &
Aguirre (2011: 129) concur with this date. There is no further indication of a publication date available from literature or
other sources, hence it should be dated 31 December 1875 according to Art. 21.3.2 ICZN.
In Doering 1875b two new generic taxa were described, and 15 at the (sub)specific level. In the Supplement
(Doering 1875c) numbers 86–127 are added to the faunal list, with reference to Doering 1874a “(Véase Boletín I 1.
51–59)”. These two papers are at present not available in BHL.
Doering, A. (“1876” [1877a]*) Apuntes sobre la fauna de moluscos de la República Argentina (Tercera parte).
Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas en Córdoba, Buenos Aires, 2 (3), 300–339.
Doering, A. (“1876” [1877b]**) Suplementos II de la lista de moluscos terrestres y fluviales en el territorio del Río
de la Plata y de la República Argentina. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas en Córdoba, Buenos
Aires, 2 (4), 339–340.
Remarks. Parodiz (1963: 4), Zilch (1971: 204), and Neubert & Janssen (2004: 245) all cite these last two works
combined as 1876, while the latter argue on the basis of an included citation by Doering of a previous paper [Doering
BREURE & MIQUEL
20 · Zootaxa 3572 © 2012 Magnolia Press
1875a] and Pfeiffer (1876), that this work “probably was issued late in 1877”. Close reading of Pfeiffer (1876) reveals,
however, that he referred to BANC 1(1) [Doering 1874a] and BANC 1(4) [Doering 1875a]. Therefore Pfeiffers paper
does not give a clue about the publication date of BANC 2 (3–4) as assumed by Neubert & Janssen. Taschenberg (1887:
174) cited issue 3 (p. 204–339) as 1876, and issue 4 (p. 340–425) as 1878. Pizá & Cazzaniga (2012: 407) cited this paper
as 1878. Unfortunately, no covers are available for the third issue of the volume, in which the largest part of Doering’s
paper (p. 300–339) was published. However, the previous paper is signed for completion “Febrero de 1877” (p. 299). We
assume therefore that vol. 2 (3) was published in the second half of 1877. Doering cited at the end of the manuscript,
which was published in vol. 2 (4) p. 340, as date of completion “Abril de 1876”; it is therefore likely that he completed
this and the following papers [1878a, 1878b] at the same time, but sent them to both journals as the continuation of PZ
was doubtful at that time. The title page of volume 2 (4) gives 1878 as publication date. In other papers in the same issue
the date “Juillet 1878” is given (p. 380); on p. 414 a letter is reproduced, dated “Mayo 26 de 1878”. Therefore we assume
that volume 2 (4) was published in the second half of 1878. As the Suplemento does not contain any new nomina, the
date of publication of this part has no nomenclatural significance and we assign it to 1877[b]. The new taxa introduced
by Doering all appeared in the first part of the paper in issue 3, thus should be attributed to 1877 in accordance with Art.
21.5 ICZN. The text of both papers is (nearly) identical to PZ 2 (4) [1878a, 1878b].
These papers are available in BHL (http://www.biodiversityheritagelibrary.org/item/103796); volume 2 (4) is also
available with its original wrappers (http://www.biodiversityheritagelibrary.org/item/23721).
Doering, A. (“1875” [1878a]*) Apuntes sobre la fauna de moluscos de la República Argentina (continuación).
Periódico Zoológico, 2 (4), 219–258.
Doering, A. (“1875” [1878b]**) Suplementos II de la lista de moluscos terrestres y fluviales en el territorio del Río
de la Plata y de la República Argentina. Periódico Zoológico, 2 (4), 258–259.
Remarks. These two papers were cited by both Miquel & Aguirre (2011: 129) and Pizá & Cazzaniga (2012: 407) as
1877. Contrarily, Taschenberg (1887: 174) cited the publication date as 1875. Doering gave as date of completion of the
manuscript “Abril de 1876” (p. 259) at the end of the Supplement [1878b]. In the same issue on p. 267 financial details
are given of the Zoological Society of Argentina (publisher of the journal), covering the dates 1.i.1874–1.vii.1877; this
indicates that this issue was published after July 1877. Finally, the date “31 de Dicembre de 1877” is mentioned on p. 274
by Weyenbergh for the completion of his manuscript on the Annual Report of the Zoological Museum. Therefore it is
likely that this issue was published early in 1878.
In Doering 1878a one genus-level taxon and 21 new species-level taxa are introduced, of which five as varieties. In
the Supplement (Doering 1878b) species numbered 128–136 are added to the faunal list. These two papers are available
in BHL (http://www.biodiversityheritagelibrary.org/item/49271).
Doering, A. (1879) Apuntes sobre la fauna de moluscos de la República Argentina (Cuarta parte). Boletín de la
Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas en Córdoba, Buenos Aires, 3 (1), 63–84.
Remarks. Doering did not sign the manuscript with a completion date; however, the previous paper in the journal
was completed “16 de Noviembre de 1878”. Parodiz (l.c.) cited this paper as 1879. There is no reason to doubt the
publication date of 1879. There is no further indication of a publication date available from literature or other sources,
hence it should be dated 31 December 1879 according to Art. 21.3.2 ICZN.
While the previous papers were largely repetitious with varying extensions of Doering 1874a, this paper was a fresh
text with description of 23 new taxa at the species-level. This paper is at present not available in BHL.
On the status of Clessinia and Scalarinella
The nomenclatural situation
Within the family Odontostomidae (sensu Breure & Romero 2012), two taxa have been described which need further
clarification, Clessinia Doering 1875 and Scalarinella Dohrn 1875. As this case is quite complicated, we need to ravel
out the situation for each taxon and compare it to the relevant Articles of the ICZN Code (i.e. Art. 11, 12 and 67.12). Two
questions need to be addressed: (1) are both names available names, and (2) what were their dates of publication?
Clessinia was described by Doering (1875a: 201)—as subgenus of Odontostomus Beck, 1837—the type species in
monotypy C. stelzneri Doering being described on the same page with a description. This fulfills all the relevant
provisions of the Code. As shown above, this paper was published before 31 May 1875.
For Scalarinella this seems to be more complicated. The first question is, is Scalarinella an available name?
Scalarinella was mentioned by Dohrn (1875: 202) as a synonym of Bulimus Scopoli, 1786. This was done in a discussion of
a species for which Dohrn (1875) used the name Bulimus cordovanus Pfeiffer, 1855. In a comment Dohrn added a note
Zootaxa 3572 © 2012 Magnolia Press · 21
DOERING DATES
saying “Ich erhielt sie unter den vielleicht auch anderweit in Anwendung gekommenen Manuscriptnamen Scalarinella
Stelzneri Doering" (literal translation: “I obtained it [the species] under the manuscript name Scalarinella Stelzneri Doering,
which [name] might perhaps also have come into usage at other occasions."). The European researcher Dohrn (1875) did
apparently not know that the South American researcher Doering (1875) had established Odontostomus (Clessinia) stelzneri
a few months earlier in an Argentinian journal. However, the name Scalarinella was not made available at this occasion
because it was only mentioned as a synonym (Art. 11.6) and not used for a taxon (Art. 11.5).
It should be noted that on the same page Dohrn (1875: 202) established another new name as Bulimulus (Scutalus)
stelzneri and gave a description for it. This was an entirely different species and must not be confounded with
Odontostomus (Clessinia) stelzneri Doering, 1875.
Pilsbry (1901 [1901–1902]: 66) used Scalarinella as a subgenus of Odontostomus Beck, 1837, attributed it to “
‘Doering’ Dohrn”, and gave a bibliographical reference to Dohrn (1875: 202). By using Scalarinella for a taxon Pilsbry
made Dohrn's (1875) name admissible under Art. 11.6.1. The criteria of Art. 12.1 were also fulfilled. Dohrn (1875) did
not give a description for Scalarinella, but combined this name with the available name Odontostomus (Clessinia)
stelzneri Doering, 1875, and clearly included Scalarinella under Bulimus cordovanus Pfeiffer, 1855 (Art. 12.2.5). So by
Pilsbry's (1901) act Scalarinella was made available as Scalarinella Dohrn, 1875. Its type species is Bulimus cordovanus
Pfeiffer, 1855 by monotypy, because this was the only nominal species directly associated with Scalarinella by Dohrn
(1875) following Art. 67.12
1
.
The second question is now what was the date of publication of Scalarinella? Dohrn’s paper (p. 202–203) appeared
in the “Malakozoologische Blätter für 1874” in sheet 13 of volume 22, comprising p. 193–208. Bürk & Jungbluth (1985)
gave as publication date 1875, without further specification. “On p. 193–202 and 207–208 and again on pp. 209–219
(forming sheet 14 = the last one of that volume) there is a review of literature which covers works from 1874 to 1875.
From 1875 are recorded (on p. 208): Hidalgo, ‘Catalogo iconografico y descriptivo de los moluscos terrestres de España,
Portugal y las Baleares, Entrega 1’ (1875), and (on p. 210): Kobelt, ‘Rossmässler Iconographie der Land- und
Süsswassermollusken, Band 4, Lieferung 1’, which was published later than May 1875 (foreword dated May 1875).
So without doubt these sheets have been published later than May 1875” (R. Janssen, pers. commun.). Since it proved
impossible to find a specific date between May and December 1875, the publication of Dohrns paper has to be dated on
31 December 1875 (Art. 21.3.2 ICZN).
Our conclusion, based on the evidence herein presented, is that Doering’s paper was published before Dohrn’s
publication. The precedence between Clessinia and Scalarinella can be determined objectively by the different dates of
publication (Art. 23.1 ICZN). Thus the name for the taxon to be used must be Clessinia Doring, 1875 [31 May 1875]
because this name has precedence over Scalarinella Dohrn, 1875 [31 Dec 1875].
The interpretation by later authors
As Doering (1875a) signed the manuscript with “Julio de 1874” and the journal was issued with “1874” on the title page,
this taxon has been quoted as “Doering, 1874” by subsequent authors (Neave 1939, Hylton Scott 1966, 1967, Schileyko
1999). Pilsbry (1901 [1901–1902]: 66) synonymized Clessinia with Scalarinella ‘Doering’ Dohrn, 1874, with type
species Bulimus cordovanus Pfeiffer, 1855; this act was followed by Thiele (1931), Haas (1936), Parodiz (1939, 1944),
and Zilch (1960 [1959–1960]).
Pfeiffer already noted in 1875 that Doering’s taxon had to be considered a junior subjective synonym of his species
B. cordovanus (Pfeiffer 1875 [1875–1877]: 105; date according to Coan et al. 2012a); this was by interpretation of
Dohrn’s text as given above. Pfeiffers opinion was followed by Pilsbry (1901 [1901–1902]), Holmberg (1912), Parodiz
(1939), and Hylton Scott (1966). The latter author was erroneous in considering Scalarinella stelzneri ‘Doering’ Dohrn a
nomen nudum (Hylton Scott 1966, 1967), but was definitely right in giving priority to Clessinia.
Acknowledgement
We are very grateful to Ronald Janssen (Frankfurt am Main), who enabled us to solve the long-standing issue of the
status of the genus Clessinia. Jan van Tol and especially two anonymous reviewers commented on previous drafts of the
manuscript, which enabled us further improvements and is here most thankfully acknowledged.
1. For the interpretion of the Example under Art. 67.12.1, it is necessary to know that Meigen (1818: 82) had mentioned a
synonym Palpomyia geniculata under a species Ceratopogon flavipes which is regarded as type species of Palpomyia by monotypy
under Art. 67.12; thus ‘directly associated’ did not refer to geniculata but to flavipes, and in the same sense cordovanus was directly
associated with Scalarinella.
BREURE & MIQUEL
22 · Zootaxa 3572 © 2012 Magnolia Press
References
Acosta, L.E. (2006) Una historia del Periódico Zoológico y la primera Sociedad Zoológica Argentina (1874–1881). Miscelánea
Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Córdoba, 105, 3–23.
Breure, A.S.H. & Romero, P.E. (2012) Support and surprises: molecular phylogeny of the land snail superfamily Orthalicoidea using
three-locus gene analysis with a divergence time analysis and ancestral area reconstruction. Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 141,
1–20.
Bürk, R. & Jungbluth, J.H. (1985) 140 Jahre Molluskenkunde im deutschsprachigen Raum 1844–1984, 1–348. Ungarisches
Naturwissenschaftliches Museum, Budapest.
Coan, E.V., Kabat, A.R. & Petit, R.D. (2012a) Annex 1: Collations of malacological significance, 1–76. Available at www.
malacological.org/pdfs/2400collations.pdf (Accessed 16 May 2012).
Coan, E.V., Kabat, A.R. & Petit, R.D. (2012b) Annex 2: Collation of the Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet (1837–1920), 1–65.
Available at www. malacological.org/pdfs/2400collations(Kuster).pdf (Accessed 16 May 2012).
Dohrn, H. (1875) Miscellen. Malakozoologische Blätter, 22, 202–203.
Duncan, F.M. (1937) On the dates of publication of the Society’s ‘Proceedings’, 1859-1926. With an appendix containing the dates of
publication of ‘Proceedings’, 1830–1858, compiled by the late F.H. Waterhouse, and of the ‘Transactions’, 1833–1869, by the
late Henry Peavot, originally publshed in P.Z.S. 1893, 1913. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 107, 71–84.
Evenhuis, N.L. (2003) Publication and dating of the journals forming the Annals and Magazine of Natural History and the Journal of
Natural History. Zootaxa, 385, 1–68.
Haas, F. (1936) Malakologische Bemerkungen und Neubeschreibungen. Senckenbergiana, 18, 143–154.
Holmberg, E.L. (1912) Bulimuli et Odontostomi Argentini adhuc indescripti, necnon species ad subgenus nondum relatae. Anales del
Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 23, 147–153.
Hylton Scott, M.I. (1966) Nueva Cyclodontina y revaloración del subgenero Clessinia Doering, 1874. Neotropica, 12, 30–35.
Hylton Scott, M.I. (1967) Nuevos Odontostomidos de Córdoba (Moll. Pulmonata). Neotropica, 13, 97–103.
ICZN (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature online. Available at http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted-sites/iczn/code/
(Accessed 31 May 2012).
Meigen, J.W. (1818) Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten Europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten. Erster Theil mit Kupfertafeln,
i–xxxvi, 1–324. Forstmann, Aachen.
Miquel, S.E., Tablado, A. & Sodor, A. (2007) Curaduría en la Colección Nacional de Invertebrados de Argentina: aportes a la
biodiversidad y biogeografía de Gasterópodos terrestres argentinos. Comunicaciones de la Sociedad Malacológica del Uruguay,
9 (90), 113–115.
Miquel, S.E. & Aguirre, M.L. (2011) Taxonomía de los gasterópodos terrestres del Cuartenario de Argentina. Revista Española de
Paleontologia, 26, 101–133.
Neubert, E. & Janssen, R. (2004) Die Typen und Typoide des Natur-Museums Senckenberg, 84: Mollusca: Gastropoda: Pulmonata:
Orthalicoidea: Bulimulidae (2), Orthalicidae, Placostylidae. Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 133, 193297.
Parodiz, J.J. (1939) Revisión de Plagiodontes y Scalarinella Odontostominae. Physis, 17, 711–734.
Parodiz, J.J. (1944) Contribuciones al conocimiento de los moluscos terrestres sudamericanos, 1. Comunicaciones Zoólogicas del
Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo, 1 (8), 1–9.
Parodiz, J.J. (1963) Observaciones anatomicas sobre Omalonyx patera Doer., con una nota biográfica acerca de Adolfo Doering
(1848–1926). Sterkiana, 12, 1–7.
Pfeiffer, L. (1875–1877) Monographia heliceorum viventium. Sistens descriptiones systematicas et criticas omnium huius familiae
generum et specierum hodie cognitarum, 8, 1–729. Brockhaus, Lipsiae.
Pfeiffer, L. (1876) Ueber die Molluskenfauna der Republik Argentina. Malakozoologische Blätter, 23, 39–42.
Pilsbry, H.A. (1901–1902) Oriental Bulimoid Helicidae; Odontostominae; Cerionidae. Manual of Conchology, (2) 14, 1–302, pl. 1–62.
Pizá, J. & Cazzaniga, N.J. (2012) Barrels and pagodas: clarifying the identity and variability of two nominal taxa of carinated land
snails in the genus Plagiodontes (Gastropoda: Orthalicidae: Odontostominae). Journal of Natural History, 46, 383–410.
Raphael, S. (1970) The publication dates of the Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, Series I, 1791–1875. Biological
Journal of the Linnean Society, 2, 61–76.
Schileyko, A.A. (1999) Treatise on Recent terrestrial pulmonate molluscs, 3. Partulidae, Aillyidae, Bulimulidae, Orthalicidae,
Megaspiridae, Urocoptidae. Ruthenica, Supplement, 2, 263–436.
Taschenberg. E.O.W. (1887) Bibliotheca zoologica II: Verzeichnis der Schriften über Zoologie welche in den periodischen Werken
enthalten und vom Jahre 1861–1880 selbständig erschienen sind: mit Einschluss der allgemein-naturgeschichtlichen,
periodischen und palaeontologischen Schriften, 1, i–xx, 1–864. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Thiele, J. (1931) Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde, 1, i–vi, 1–778. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
Winckworth, R. (1936) Journal de Conchyliologie: dates of publication. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 22, 153–156.
Zilch, A. (1959–1960) Gastropoda, Teil 2: Euthyneura Pulmonata. In: O. Schindelwolf, Handbuch der Paläozoologie, 6, 2, i–xii,
1–834. Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin.
Zilch, A. (1971) Die Typen und Typoide des Natur-Museums Senckenberg, 47: Mollusca-Euthyneura von A. Döring aus Argentinien.
Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 101, 195–213.
... Isomeria aequatoria (L. Pfeiffer, 1860). A-D, probable syntype ZMB/Moll 264728. E, labels, showing provenance. Scale bar: line 10 mm.cation of Döring's taxon has been frequently misinterpreted due to the complex and confusing history of the journal in which it was published.Breure & Miquel (2012) have provided an overview of relevant papers by Döring, with details on their dates of publication.Döring (1877Döring ( : 316, 1878 also described in the same publications the variety minor, so the dimensions of the nominotypical species are thus at the larger end of the ranges quoted above. The lectotype is in SMF (SMF 7708) and was fi ...
Article
Full-text available
Type material of some South American species in the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, belonging to different families is documented. It includes 16 species: Bulimus cuneus L. Pfeiffer, 1854, Bulimus proteus Broderip, 1832, Bulimus scalarioides L. Pfeiffer, 1867, Bulimus similaris J. Moricand, 1856, Andinia (Ehrmanniella) dedicata Weyrauch & Zilch, 1954, Helix hettneriana E. von Martens, 1897, Eurycampta hidalgonis Döring, 1877, Helix aequatoris L. Pfeiffer, 1860, Helix bituberculata L. Pfeiffer, 1853, Helix bourcieri L. Pfeiffer, 1853, Helix neogranadensis L. Pfeiffer, 1845, Cyclostoma (Cyclophorus) bourcieri L. Pfeiffer, 1854, and Helix platygyra Albers, 1857. The concept of the “salvation” of type material is explained.
... Scolodonta rinae makes up just over half of the total specimens of micro-mollusks collected at Los Gemelos (Table 2). For the current nomenclatural arrangement of the genus Scol odonta see Breure & Miquel (2012 ...
Article
Full-text available
For the first time we document several species of micro-mollusks in the Galapagos inhabiting lichens and bryophytes, possibly using them as part of their diet. Eight species of micro-mollusks were found as a by-catch among 10% of 400 herbarium specimens collected throughout the archipelago. Nine species of lichens and 6 of bryophytes were inhabited. The endemic Pupisoma galapagorum was the most common micro-mollusk, particularly frequent among Heterodermia, occasionally found on Cyphellostereum, Squamidium nigricans, and among hepatics (Frullania, Bryopteris). Other micromollusks were Tornatellides chathamensis, Pupisoma dioscoricola, Helicina sp., and Succinea sp. Examination of the digestive tract of P. galapagorum detected green algae, hyphae, spores, and fragments of bryophyte leaves (possibly S. nigricans). This endemic micro-mollusk apparently uses lichens and bryophytes not only for shelter but also as food. Another snail found repeatedly is a predator, described here as Scolodonta rinae n. sp. It is a member of Scolodontidae, a Neotropical family considered endemic to continental South America, and here for the first time documented from the Galapagos. Pupisoma galapagorum, previously known from Floreana, Isabela, San Cristóbal, and Santa Cruz, is reported also from Pinta and Santiago. Ambrosiella floreanae, previously considered endemic to Floreana, is reported from Santa Cruz. © E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele u. Obermiller) and Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2017.
Preprint
Full-text available
The land snails collected by the ‘Comisión Científica del Pacifíco’ (CCP), a Spanish expedition to South and Central America from 1862–1866, are restudied and revised. The historical context of the expedition and the study of its collected material are described. Biographical data is given for the main persons involved. The land snails were previously studied by Joaquin Hidalgo between 1867 and 1893. A total of 3470 specimens belonging to 211 species are treated in this paper. Of 34 species mentioned by Hidalgo is his catalogue, the corresponding material could not be located. A lectotype is now designated for Drymaeus ( Drymaeus ) chanchamayensis (Hidalgo, 1870); Bulimus visendus Hidalgo, 1869 is now placed in the genus Synapterpes Pilsbry, 1896, a new combination.
Preprint
Full-text available
The land snails collected by the ‘Comisión Científica del Pacifíco’ (CCP), a Spanish expedition to South and Central America from 1862–1866, are restudied and revised. The historical context of the expedition and the study of its collected material are described. Biographical data is given for the main persons involved. The land snails were previously studied by Joaquin Hidalgo between 1867 and 1893. A total of 3470 specimens belonging to 211 species are treated in this paper. Of 34 species mentioned by Hidalgo is his catalogue, the corresponding material could not be located. A lectotype is now designated for Drymaeus ( Drymaeus ) chanchamayensis (Hidalgo, 1870); Bulimus visendus Hidalgo, 1869 is now placed in the genus Synapterpes Pilsbry, 1896, a new combination.
Article
Full-text available
The land snails collected by the ‘Comisión Científica del Pacifíco’ (CCP), a Spanish expedition to South and Central America from 1862–1866, are restudied and revised. The historical context of the expedition and the study of its collected material are described. Biographical data is given for the main persons involved. The land snails were previously studied by Joaquin Hidalgo between 1867 and 1893. A total of 3,470 specimens belonging to 211 species are treated in this paper. Of 34 species mentioned by Hidalgo is his catalogue, the corresponding material could not be located. Bulimus visendus Hidalgo, 1869 is now placed in the genus Synapterpes Pilsbry, 1896, a new combination.
Article
Full-text available
The type status is described of 96 taxa classified within the superfamily Orthalicoidea and present in the Mollusca collection of the Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Lectotypes are designated for the following taxa: Orthalicus elegans Rolle, 1895; Bulimus maranhonensis Albers, 1854; Orthalicus nobilis Rolle, 1895; Orthalichus tricinctus Martens, 1893. Orthalicus sphinx tresmariae is introduced as new name for Zebra sphinx turrita Strebel, 1909, not Zebra quagga turrita Strebel, 1909. The following synonyms are established: Zebra crosseifischeri Strebel, 1909 = Orthalicus princeps fischeri Martens, 1893; Orthalicus isabellinus Martens, 1873 = Orthalicus bensoni (Reeve, 1849); Zebra zoniferus naesiotes Strebel, 1909 = Orthalicus undatus (Bruguière, 1789); Porphyrobaphe (Myiorthalicus) dennisoni pallida Strebel, 1909 = Hemibulimus dennisoni (Reeve, 1848); Zebra delphinus pumilio Strebel, 1909 = Orthalicus delphinus (Strebel, 1909); Orthalicus (Laeorthalicus) reginaeformis Strebel, 1909 = Corona perversa (Swainson, 1821); Bulimus (Eurytus) corticosus Sowerby III, 1895 = Plekocheilus (Eurytus) stuebeli Martens, 1885. The taxon Bulimus (Eudioptus) psidii Martens, 1877 is now placed within the family Sagdidae, tentatively in the genus Platysuccinea. Appendices are included with an index to all the types of Orthalicoidea extant (including those listed by Köhler 2007) and a partial list of letters present in the correspondence archives.
Article
Full-text available
This systematic review synthesizes our updated knowledge of 33 species and subspecies of Stylomatophoran gastropods, which belong to the genera Gastrocopta, Succinea, Radiodiscus, Retidiscus, Rotadiscus, Cecilioides, Austroborus, Megalobulimus, Bulimulus, Discoleus, Naesiotus, Plagiodontes, Spixia, Scolodonta, Miradiscops and Epiphragmophora. We provide published and unpublished records of the terrestrial molluscan taxa and a critical review, including data from the most important collections deposited in institutions from Argentina and abroad. All the taxa described have modern representatives; only two, Succinea rosariensis and Scolodonta argentina, still require confirmation regarding their taxonomic validity. The genera with confirmed older than Quaternary records are Austroborus, Megalobulimus, Radiodiscus, Rotadiscus and Succinea, which occur since the Paleogene. Regarding the modern geographical distribution, well known records involve part of Argentina (Subtropical and Pampean Dominia of the Guayanian-Brazilian Subregion and the Central Dominion of the Andean Subregion, both in the Neotropical Region). The best-known fraction of the fossil molluscs recovered corresponds to species of medium to large-size dimensions, whereas taxa of less than 5 mm have very seldom been mentioned before. Approximately 60% of the species recorded belong to the Orthalicidae (=Bulimulidae), the Strophochei-lidae represent ca. 15%, while other families like the Xanthonychidae, Charopidae and Scolodontidae provide ca. 10% each. This review made evident that the main contributions on this subject were published by Joaquín Frenguelli who was responsible for having formed and organize the most important Quaternary terrestrial collection from Argentina, made of over a hundred lots deposited at the Museo de La Plata (Invertebrate Palaeontology Department). The synthesis on the distribution and ecological requirements of the taxa identified provide the basic source of reference necessary to carry out future palaeoenvironmental and palaeoclimatical interpretations, complementary of research work performed based on mammals, pollen and phytoliths, as well as to select significative and reliable taxa for geochronological and isotope analyses on shells from Neogene sediments traditionally known as chronostratigraphical units (Platense, Cordobense, Bonaerense, Ensenadense of the local literature).
Article
Full-text available
Phylogenetic relationships of Orthalicoidea, a highly diverse and dominant element in the Neotropics, were studied using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences (ITS2/28S, CO1, H3). Specimens of various locations from the Southern Hemisphere (South America, Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Solomon Islands) were analysed (74 taxa, representing 30 genera). Our results support previously presented hypotheses, but also give surprises in terms of unexpected topologies. Phylogenetic trees were estimated using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference, and compared with traditional classifications. Phylogenetic estimations using three loci gave a strong support for monophyly of Orthalicoidea, as well as for some clades within this group (Bulimulidae, Bothriembryontidae, Orthalicidae, Amphibulimulidae), but not for others (Odontostomidae and Megaspiridae). In the resulting revision of the classification scheme of the Orthalicoidea, the tribe Simpulopsini is raised to family rank. One new subfamily is recognized, the Bostrycinae. The family Bulimulidae Tryon 1867 is retained under ICZN Art. 35.5, despite the senior synonymy of Peltellinae Gray 1855. Our analysis supports an origin of the Orthalicoidea in South America, with subsequent radiations into other parts of the Neotropics and the Southern Hemisphere. The hypothesis that the distribution on the southern continents may be explained by vicariance due to break-up of Gondwana is only partially supported by divergence time analysis using fossil calibrations. Ancestral area reconstruction suggests various independent dispersals out of South America into Central America and the West Indies, and possibly two independent dispersals to explain the remaining relations between groups of taxa on the southern continents. Divergence time analysis further shows that the major diversification of extant taxa within the superfamily may have started around the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.
Article
Full-text available
A HISTORY OF THE PERIÓDICO ZOOLÓGICO AND THE FIRST SOCIEDAD ZOOLÓGICA ARGENTINA (1874-1881). — This paper presents a historical account of the origins and development of the very first Argentinean Zoological Society (Sociedad Zoológica Argentina, initially erected as an Entomological Society), and of its scientific journal, the Periódico Zoológico. Comments are given on the initiatives of the Society’s founder, Hendrik Weyenbergh, who was the first Professor of Zoology in the University of Córdoba, as well as an outline on the relevance of this publication for that time and its meaning for the history of the Zoology in Argentina. The circumstances and difficulties that Weyenbergh had to face (both financial, academical, political, material and personal ones) to sustain the Society and its journal are discussed. A complete listing of the contents of the three published volumes of the Periódico Zoológico, and a quantitative summary showing the relative contribution of each author are included.
Article
Full-text available
Plagiodontes weyenberghii (Doering, 18779. Doering , A. 1877. [“1875”]. Apuntes sobre la fauna de moluscos de la República Argentina (continuación). Periód Zool, 2: 219–259. View all references) has a shell with a strong suprasutural keel; the species inhabits a restricted area in Central Argentina. Plagiodontes weyenberghii minor (Parodiz, 193920. Parodiz , JJ. 1939. Revisión de Plagiodontes y Scalarinella (Odontostominae). Physis, 17: 711–734. View all references) was described as a subspecies with obese shells and broader geographic distribution; some populations were sympatric with Plagiodontes daedaleus (Deshayes, 1851). A discriminant analysis on 244 adult shells combined with original information on the internal anatomy confirmed the distinctiveness of P. weyenberghii weyenberghii, whereas P. weyenberghii minor showed a broad overlap with P. daedaleus and no evidence of anatomical differences. As a consequence, P. weyenberghii minor is considered a junior subjective synonym of P. daedaleus daedaleus (Deshayes, 1851). Plagiodontes weyenberghii (Doering, 18779. Doering , A. 1877. [“1875”]. Apuntes sobre la fauna de moluscos de la República Argentina (continuación). Periód Zool, 2: 219–259. View all references) has unique characteristics such as the weak vascularization of the pallial system, the relative size of the penial papilla and its accessory lobe, the markedly swollen distal portion of the bursa copulatrix duct, the spermoviduct with two whorls, and the vagina with a medial depression.
Article
Pagination and dates of publication for almost 2,000 separate issues of the journals that formed the Annals and Magazine of Natural History and the Journal of Natural History are presented. These journals include: Magazine of Natural History (1828–1840), Magazine of Zoology and Botany (1836–1838), Annals of Natural History (1838–1840), the Annals and Magazine of Natural History (1841–1967), and the Journal of Natural History (1967–date).
Article
All types and selected important voucher lots of Orthalicoidea present in the collection of the Natur-Museum Senckenberg are listed, in alphabetical order, with all relevant data and illustrated in colour. So far necessary the status of particular lots is discussed. In addition, all taxa are grouped together according to their actual systematic placement. 122 primary types (holoresp. lectotypes) are listed, 67 taxa are represented by syntype lots, another 106 taxa by paratypes resp. so called "original lots". In total the type material of Orthalicoidea comprises 442 lots.