Terra Nova Development: Challenges and Lessons Learned

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.


In the past 10 years developments in technology and the opening up of new frontiers, combined with a demand to move into greater water depths have resulted in considerable increase in the use of floating facilities for offshore oil production. The Terra Nova Development has and will establish a number of project "firsts" including the first FPSO to operate in North American waters and the first to operate in a harsh North Atlantic environment frequented by sea ice and icebergs. Also stereotypical of this region are cold air and water temperatures, seasonal fog, and heavy seas. Overcoming these challenges has required Terra Nova to adopt the lessons learned from pervious FPSO developments in the North Sea, while using both proven and new technology, and utilizing the benefits on an alliance-based contracting approach. The result is a unique development solution with a number of lessons learned. Introduction The Terra Nova oilfield is located approximately 350km (220 miles) east-southeast of St. John's, Newfoundland, 35km (22 miles) southeast of the Hibernia oilfield in a water depth of 90 to 100m (295-330ft.). Figure 1 shows the field location. The total recoverable oil reserves in the field are estimated by the Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board (CNOPB) to be some 64?106m3 (400 million barrels). The top of the reservoir is located 3,200m (10,500ft.) below the seafloor. The field is made up of three geological fault blocks: the Graben, the East Flank and Far East as shown in Figure 2. Only the Graben and East Flank blocks have been delineated. Twenty-four wells are proposed for Graben and East Flank: 14 producers, 7 water injection and 3 gas injectors. If further delineation drilling in the Far East block, which is planned for 2002, locates commercially viable hydrocarbon reserves, an additional 5 producers and 5 water injectors may be required. The Terra Nova field development concept is shown in Figure 3. An ice strengthened, double-hulled Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) facility with subsea wells and gathering system will be used for the development of the Terra Nova field. Development wells are being drilled using the mobile semisubmersible drilling unit "Henry Goodrich," through seven subsea templates placed in four 10m deep glory holes, used to protect the wellheads and xmas trees from scouring icebergs. Trenched and rock bermed flowlines connected to flexible risers will link the subsea wells to the FPSO. Crude will be offloaded by a dynamically-positioned shuttle tanker positioned at the stern of the FPSO. Terra Nova - A Project of Firsts The Terra Nova Development has set a large number of "firsts" which have significantly contributed to the challenges in the execution of the project. These "firsts" are varied in theme and include:First FPSO development on the Grand Banks and only the second offshore oil development on the challenging Grand Banks of Newfoundland.First offshore facility in Canada to be certified to both offshore petroleum and shipping regulations.First fully-automated quick disconnectable turret and riser system on a FPSO.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... The advantages have been reported on a variety of offshore structures [299,300]. The design and development of these structures have been identified in a variety of literature on CGBS [300][301][302][303][304][305][306][307][308][309][310][311][312], FPSOs [313][314][315][316][317][318][319][320][321][322][323][324][325][326][327][328][329], compliant platforms [330][331][332][333][334][335][336][337][338][339][340][341][342][343][344], fixed jacket platforms and SPARS [370][371][372][373][374][375][376][377][378][379][380][381][382][383][384][385][386][387][388][389]. Another well-known application of offshore platforms is for generating energy via offshore wind farms [390][391][392][393][394][395][396][397][398][399][400]. ...
Full-text available
Diverse forms of offshore oil and gas structures are utilized for a wide range of purposes and in varying water depths. They are designed for unique environments and water depths around the world. The applications of these offshore structures require different activities for proper equipment selection, design of platform types, and drilling/production methods. This paper will provide a general overview of these operations as well as the platform classifications. In this paper, a comprehensive review is conducted on different offshore petroleum structures. This study examines the fundamentals of all types of offshore structures (fixed and floating), as well as the applications of these concepts for oil exploration and production. The study also presents various design parameters for state-of-the-art offshore platforms and achievements made in the industry. Finally, suitable types of offshore platforms for various water depths are offered for long-term operations. An extension of this study (Part II) covers sustainable design approaches and project management on these structures; this review helps designers in understanding existing offshore structures, and their uniqueness. Hence, the review also serves as a reference data source for designing new offshore platforms and related structures.
... The Hibernia GBS is designed to withstand impacts by large icebergs (design and safety level icebergs of 1.4 million and 6 million tonnes respectively, Blanchet et al., 1999). The Terra-Nova (Lever et al., 2001) and Whiterose (Norman et al., 2008) FPSOs are designed to disconnect and move off site if an approaching iceberg cannot be managed through towing. ...
Conference Paper
A number of solutions have been successfully implemented for producing oil and gas off Canada’s east coast, where impacts by icebergs are a possibility. In future, as operators move further offshore to deeper water and further north where the numbers and sizes of icebergs may increase, new solutions for avoiding impacts will be required to limit ice strengthening requirements and ice related downtime costs. A potential solution is the use of facility side-tracking, where a floating system is designed to move laterally to avoid approaching icebergs. This paper discusses the issues involved including the need for improved short-term iceberg drift forecasting. Copyright © 2015 by ASME Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal
... Various treatment and disposal options for the water transported onshore have been investigated including reinjection and biological treatment. In Newfoundland and Labrador, the Terra Nova oilfield is operating produced water reinjection from an ice strengthened, double-hulled Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) facility [194]. Implications on produced water management in the Arctic region are discussed below. ...
Operators have spent $84 billion Canadian dollars in exploration, development, and production offshore Newfoundland, Canada, between 1966 and 2019, and have produced about 2 billion barrels of an estimated 3.3 billion barrels recoverable oil. Four major projects have been developed—Hibernia, Terra Nova, White Rose/North Amethyst, and Hebron—using two development concepts, gravity-base structures and floating production storage and offloading vessels. The region is characterized by severe storm and sea conditions, including the presence of icebergs, which challenge all aspects of exploration and development. From 1998 to 2019, exploration and delineation drilling cost averaged $90.9 million per well and $26,494 per meter drilled. Development wells drilled from mobile offshore drilling units over the same period averaged $91.1 million per producer well and $68.8 million per injector well. Regional development cost was $32.5/bbl since the start of production and is expected to fall to $22/bbl when recoverable volumes circa 2020 have been extracted. Average regional production cost from 2006 to 2019 is estimated at $23.4/bbl and ranges from $16.8/bbl at Hibernia to about $35/bbl at Terra Nova and White Rose. This is the first detailed evaluation of exploration, development, and production cost offshore Newfoundland.
Conference Paper
Icebergs can pose risks to platforms in arctic and subarctic regions. These risks require careful consideration during design, and as well during operations. Platforms must be designed to withstand potential impacts from icebergs, or to disconnect and move offsite to avoid impacts. ISO 19906 allows use of ice management to mitigate iceberg and sea-ice actions. In the case of icebergs, management may include detection, monitoring, towing, disconnection and evacuation. Threat assessment is also a critical input to the iceberg management decision-making process. For example, given one or more detected icebergs and available information on the iceberg and environment characteristics, what is the probability of exceeding platform design ice actions? Based on the threat assessment, better decisions can be made regarding which iceberg to manage, whether more information should be acquired, and whether shut-down or evacuation is needed. This paper describes a new tool developed to estimate the distribution of iceberg impact actions from an encroaching iceberg given concurrent metocean conditions, conditional on impact. The tool can be used in a number of ways depending on the information available to the user. It can be used to assess the threat from a single iceberg or can be used to compare actions from multiple icebergs in the region, or for the same iceberg but with changing weather conditions. The iceberg load assessment tool is demonstrated for several example cases on the Grand Banks, showing the benefit of improved iceberg characterization obtained through rapid iceberg profiling.
Hydrocarbon basins in global arctic regions hold significant resources with economic potential to support an array of economic sectors including energy, transportation, petrochemical, agricultural, and manufacturing industries. Due to the harsh physical environment, northern and arctic regions present significant technical and logistical challenges that influence the development of engineering solutions through the design process and may affect the project viability and sanction with respect to technical or economic factors. One of the more significant hazards and extreme loading events encountered is ice gouging due to the interaction of ice features with the seabed subject to environmental driving forces. Trenching and pipeline burial is viewed as one of the most effective mitigation techniques used to promote pipeline serviceability and reduce the risk of pipeline damage; however, there are limitations and constraints with current technologies with respect to the maximum trenching depth and production rates that affect project logistics and economic risk. In addition, there are other physical environmental factors that present challenges including the short open water season, low temperatures, and presence of special terrain characteristics (e.g., hardpan, permafrost, massive ground ice). Current practice used to define system demand (i.e., geotechnical loads) and system capacity (i.e., pipeline mechanical performance) has limitations due to inherent uncertainties with the statistics of physical data sets, experimental techniques, and engineering models used in the analysis. Advancements in computational methods have provided improved engineering tools to analyze these complex nonlinear processes with probabilistic methods providing an objective framework to assess design options with respect to technical, economic, and environmental criteria that meet specified target safety levels. Consideration of cumulative effects, climate change, and sustainability factors add an additional layer of complexity to the engineering framework in terms of social context and political values.
Conference Paper
The majority of exploration, development and production offshore Newfoundland has occurred in shallow water. Currently there are two floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels and one gravity based structure producing oil on the Grand Banks. In recent years, there has been a move to deeper water offshore Newfoundland. There have been significant discoveries at Bay du Nord and Mizzen, and new licence blocks are opening up towards the north and northwest of the existing producing fields. With the move towards deeper water, new challenges arise. Supply facilities, search and rescue equipment and other required infrastructure is much further away. A GBS structure is no longer an option due to the water depth. A disconnectable concrete Spar is being considered as a concept for deep water locations off Canada’s east coast. The platform is designed to withstand iceberg impacts, or to be disconnected and moved off location to avoid impacts from very large ice features. Global design loads (ice crushing forces on the platform) and mooring systems global loads were estimated using a two-step approach. First the concrete Spar was assumed to be fixed (i.e. not able to move during an iceberg impact) and quasi-static global design loads were estimated using the Iceberg Load Software (ILS). The ILS was developed to model iceberg impacts with a fixed platform such as a gravity based structure (GBS). Assuming the concrete Spar to be fixed is a very conservative assumption for floating platforms which are free to move upon impact, albeit limited by a mooring system. Second, the inertial properties of the platform and the mooring compliance were approximated using a one-dimensional time-step model. Since the time domain model is not as efficient computationally, a subset of the simulated impacts from the quasi-static analysis was used as input into the time domain model, and dynamic design loads were estimated. The resulting design loads were used by designers to ensure that the structure meets the requirements of ISO 19906:2010. The end product is a more effective design for the platform, while not compromising the safety of the personnel onboard or the integrity of the structure, mooring system or risers.
The paper describes reservoir management challenges during the first 5 years of the production from the Terra Nova oil field, located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The purpose of the paper is to share lessons learned in the appraisal strategy, data monitoring, subsurface modeling and production management of this subsea/ floating, production, storage, offloading (FPSO) development. The material covers appraisal history, reservoir description, production history, reservoir monitoring, reservoir management, lessons learned and future challenges. The paper will discuss the need for a balanced approach regarding development and delineation of the resources. Since there is no gas export from Terra Nova or any of the Grand Banks fields, surplus gas has to be re-injected. The Terra Nova depletion plan requires that the production from the water injection region and the gas flood regions be balanced for optimum pressure management. The relative richness of the injection gas from the Terra Nova production process has the potential to create miscible gas-oil conditions. We will discuss how slim tube experiments and compositional tracking of the fluids have demonstrated benefits to the oil recovery by operating the gasflood at a reasonable pressure. The Terra Nova field lies not only in a harsh environment but also in an immature, low infrastructure area. This has led to additional challenges regarding reservoir management and future development. Production behavior and history matching have shown that seismically defined fault blocks are transmissible rather than sealing. The presence of leaky faults is beneficial for oil recovery, but presents challenges for precise reservoir simulation modeling and history matching. Terra Nova has extensive amount of data from bottom hole pressure gauges, wireline formation pressures (e.g. RFT/RCI), water cut trends GOR trends, gas tracers, etc. The paper discusses how these data have been integrated in the reservoir management process. Various history matching approaches will be discussed; both manual history matching and assisted techniques (experimental design). This is to the best of our knowledge the first SPE paper from the Grand Banks oil province that describes integrated reservoir management challenges particular to this region. Introduction The Terra Nova oil field is situated on the Grand Banks, about 350 km east-southeast of the city of St. John's in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador. The Terra Nova field is located in the Jeanne d'Arc basin 35 km southeast of the Hibernia oil field and 25 km southwest of the White Rose field (Figure 1). It is the second largest producing oil field in East Coast Canada.
Conference Paper
Floating, production, storage and offloading (FPSO) systems are an alternative to other types of deep water development and production systems such as spar platforms, tension leg platforms and floating production systems. A typical FPSO vessel may produce up to 300,000 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) and 300 million standard cubic feet of gas per day (SCFGPD), with one million barrels of on board oil storage. Oil off loading is normally by shuttle tanker and associated gas is normally injected to maintain field pressure. These vessels typically have more extensive electrical systems than the typical fixed platforms. Electrical loads may total 40-50 MW or more depending on the vessel configuration. Selection of the large drivers (turbines versus motors), picking the generation configuration (including prime, essential and emergency), configuring the electrical distribution system, and locating the various parts of the electrical distribution system (hull versus topsides) are major critical early decisions that will impact the future coordination efforts of the project. This paper explores the design of various electrical systems and installation issues of typical FPSOs and provides some lessons learned.
This article describes about the design of various electrical systems and installation issues of typical FPSOs (Floating, Production, Storage, and Offloading) system and provide some lessons learned. FPSO consists of a vessel or hull and a topsides facility creates many electrical interface issues between the two major parts of the completed vessel. These vessels typically have more extensive electrical systems than the typical fixed platforms. Electrical operating loads may total 40-50 MW or more depending on the vessel configuration. For the purpose of this typical FPSO design, it is assumed that the selected drivers are all electric motors. It is assumed that the total connected load is 70 MW with an operating load of 40 MW. Based on the electrical load requirements, the FPSO has an extensive electrical distribution system. The distribution system for a FPSO are very similar to those of any large distribution system. Lessons learned can only be effective if the are collected on current projects, reviewed for accuracy and sufficient detail to describe the issue, distributed to future project personnel, and incorporated into the new project design. Many of the lessons learned presented in this article are applicable to other types of electrical work and not limited to FPSOs.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.