Article

HMPE Mooring Line Trial for Scarabeo III

Authors:
  • Kuraray America, Inc.
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

This paper describes the deployment of a high-modulus polyethylene (HMPE) mooring insert line on the Scarabeo III MODU. Several new technologies are now available that can increase the maximum rated water depth of 2nd and 3rd generation drilling rigs. The purpose of this trial was to qualify one such technology, the use of lightweight synthetic fiber rope mooring lines. The desire to deploy and recover the lines on existing boats and equipment led to the selection of HMPE as the trial rope material. HMPE ropes are almost neutrally buoyant, have high abrasion resistance and exhibit a strength-to-diameter ratio similar to that of steel wire rope. The HMPE line used in the present study, a field-repairable Plasma® 12×12-strand braided rope, served without incident for 3 years. After damage was discovered at one of the rope terminations, the rope was returned to the manufacturer for retermination and residual strength determination. The rope was also inspected and any damaged strands repaired prior to being returned to service. The study demonstrated the durability and ease of handling of these lines, in particular the 12×12-strand braid, for MODU mooring applications. The scope of the paper includes static mooring analysis, deployment procedures, mooring load data and residual strength data. Recommendations are made regarding deployment methods for synthetic ropes. Introduction There is a growing desire on the part of operators to utilize 2 nd and 3 rd generation MODUs in deeper water, to take advantage of their wider availability and lower day-rates. Generally speaking, increasing the water-depth capability of an existing rig requires extensive upgrades to several operational areas, including the draw works, mud system, and buoyancy. These upgrades typically require 6-12 months in drydock and 10's of millions of dollars in capex, particularly for the addition of high-buoyancy sponsons. Because of the time and cost involved in a traditional drydock upgrade, many drillers and rig owners are exploring other options. Emerging technologies that can extend depth capability include new mud systems, artificial seabeds, and synthetic mooring lines. Many of these upgrades can be used immediately on existing rigs with minimal or no drydocking and relatively low downtime costs. One such simple upgrade technology is the use of lightweight high-performance-fiber mooring lines as a replacement for much heavier steel wire rope. The use of synthetic fiber lines can greatly reduce the vertical loads on the rig, enable the use of existing winches in greater water depths, and/or increase the amount of available variable deck load. This is particularly important when drilling with older rigs in locations far from an established offshore logistical infrastructure. Environmentally induced offset can also be reduced, in part because of the higher fairlead angles possible with synthetics. 1,2 As with many other proposed new drilling technologies, actual field experience specific to MODUs is limited. The principal goals of the present study were to gain experience with one type of high-performance fiber rope, high-modulus polyethylene (HMPE). Specifically the study set out to identify handling issues with these types of lines, to verify their potential for weight savings, and to gage their ability to withstand typical operational environments.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... Lifetime predictions are currently virtually impossible for these higher performance materials. As a result there have been very few attempts to use materials other than polyester, though two recent MODU applications of HMPE proved very successful 16,17 . Aramids have been used little since the failures reported in a mooring application in the 1980's 1 . ...
... The aramid rope was a 6+1 wire rope construction of Twaron 1000 fibres. The polyester data presented here was generated on a parallel strand construction rope of Diolen 855TN fibres, in a previous study 16,17 . The largest rope was of 745 ton MBL. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents a study of the use of synthetic fibre mooring lines for deep-sea applications. Three materials are considered: polyester, aramid and HMPE. First, results from a test program completed recently are described. These tests on full size ropes, which include novel extensometric methods based on image analysis, have enabled the influence of mean load, load range and loading frequency on stiffness to be determined for the three materials. Ropes up to 750 tons MBL (minimum break load) have been tested. A comprehensive data set of this type has not been available previously. These data are then used in mooring system analyses, to evaluate a number of design cases for the station keeping of exploration and production platforms. This has allowed a better understanding of the domains of application of these different materials and of related issues for design. Materials research needs have also been clarified. The minimum tension criterion for HMPE and aramid fibre ropes is shown to be one of the critical technical parameters that should be further investigated in order to extend the further application of these materials for taut mooring systems design. Attention should also be given to fatigue analysis for the aramid and HMPE lines. Introduction As water depth increases, synthetic fibre ropes become increasingly attractive candidates for station keeping. In spite of some initial difficulties with aramid ropes 20 years ago1, over the last five years polyester has become an accepted alternative to steel for this application. The extensive studies and pioneering applications of Petrobras have led to increased confidence 2–4 and this is the preferred option for depths down to 1500 meters. However, with the numerous discoveries of large reserves in deeper water the question of whether polyester ropes can be used at all depths has been raised. Recently polyester was used in field trials down to 1900 meters depth5 but there are few guidelines concerning alternative materials. Chaplin & Del Vecchio compared polyester ropes to steel at depths of 500, 1000 and 2000 meters6. Cloos & Bosman compared nylon, polyester, and aramid ropes at depths to 3000 meters and concluded that there is a minimum depth for each material, that for aramid being 1000 meters7. One aspect to be considered is the size and weight of large polyester ropes, and the implications for handling equipment and installation procedures. Figure 1 shows a comparison of rope sizes as a function of MBL (minimum break load). A 1000 ton MBL polyester rope has a diameter around 200 mm, and, with the several kilometer lengths to be deployed, this may exceed the storage capacity of anchor handling vessels. Figure 1 also shows that aramid and HMPE ropes are much closer to traditional steel wire in diameter. The equivalent polyester line will require two to three times the storage capacity that is needed for the other materials.
... literature [10]. High modulus polyethylene (HMPE), however, is a newer material, also more expensive, but it has excellent mechanical performance and there are studies for Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit [11,12]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Polymeric multifilaments have gained a significant interest in recent decades. In the studies of mechanical characteristics, although there are different types of tests, such as rupture, abrasion, creep, impact and fatigue, it can be said that the main mechanical characterisation is the tensile rupture strength (Yarn Break Load, YBL), which also serves as a parameter for other tests. The objective of this work is to evaluate the results of breaking strength under different torsional conditions in polymeric multifilaments and to determine optimal twists for failures. The test were carried out with the following materials: polyamide, polyester, and high modulus polyethylene (HMPE), and for torsional conditions: 0, 20, 40, 60, 120, 240, and 480 turns per metre. As a result, for these torsion groups, curves were obtained for the three materials that present an optimal point of maximum rupture value, which was also experimentally proven. The twist that optimises the breaking strength of HMPE is 38 turns per metre, 56 turns per metre for polyester, and 95 turns per metre for polyamide. The twist groups that exceed the optimal torsion have a deleterious effect on the material, where the multifilament ceases to be homogeneous and starts to create an excessive "spring effect". The results found differ from the recommendation of the standard that regulates the YBL test, and thus, a relationship is built between groups of optimal torsion and linear density that provides evidence that the increase in linear density causes the optimal torsion for rupture to also increase, while the standard places a condition of 30 turns per metre for linear densities greater than 2200 dtex, and 60 turns per metre for linear densities less than 2200 dtex. In addition to optimal torsion values, this conclusion is paramount, the test procedure makes a general recommendation that does not optimise the breaking strength.
... Due to the increasing exploration of oil and gas in deep waters, synthetic fiber materials including polyester, polyamide, aramid and high modulus polyethylene (HMPE) have become attractive as the alternatives for the steel chain and wire ropes because of their advantages such as weight saving, smaller footprint and easier storage and installation. Since 1980s, serious consideration of synthetic mooring lines have begun with trial use of aramid fiber ropes [1]. After a period of research and development, nearly during 1990s, polyester ropes emerged as the leading method of minimizing the weight of the taut-wire mooring system while retaining acceptable station-keeping performance [2]. ...
... To provide insight for device developers and operators, a pertinent review of several key aspects is provided in this paper, including performance and durability attributes, classication and testing, in addition to installation and decommissioning considerations. Since the rst use of nylon ropes for towing applications in the 1950s and initial tests of aramid mooring ropes in the 1980s [11], synthetic ropes have been used in a wide range of demanding surface and subsea applications. Adoption of these materials has been driven by favourable cost, physical property and performance attributes and these criteria have become increasingly important for fossil fuel exploration in ultra deepwater (>2000 m). ...
Article
Full-text available
Synthetic mooring ropes have a proven track record of use in harsh operating conditions over the past two decades. As one of the main users of ropes for permanent mooring systems, the oil and gas industry has opted for these components because they possess performance characteristics and economies of scale which are in many respects superior to steel components. Given this accrued experience, it is unsurprising that several marine renewable energy (MRE) device developers have utilised synthetic ropes, motivated by the need to specify economical, reliable and durable mooring systems. Whilst these components are potentially an enabling technology for the MRE sector, this is a new field of application which can feature highly dynamic mooring tensions and consequently existing certification practices may not be directly applicable. Based on the expertise of the authors, this paper provides a state-of-the-art overview of synthetic ropes in the context of MRE mooring systems, including key information about aspects of specification (performance attributes, classification and testing) as well as application (installation, degradation, maintenance, inspection and decommissioning). It is the intention of this review to provide valuable insight for device developers who are considering using ropes in the specification of fit for purpose mooring systems.
... Due to the increasing exploration of oil and gas in deep waters, synthetic fiber materials including polyester, polyamide, aramid and high modulus polyethylene (HMPE) have become attractive as the alternatives for the steel chain and wire ropes because of their advantages such as weight saving, smaller footprint and easier storage and installation. Since 1980s, serious consideration of synthetic mooring lines have begun with trial use of aramid fiber ropes [1]. After a period of research and development, nearly during 1990s, polyester ropes emerged as the leading method of minimizing the weight of the taut-wire mooring system while retaining acceptable station-keeping performance [2]. ...
... The light weight, absence of corrosion, and low stiffness drive the use of fiber ropes in place of wire rope in many applications in a variety of industries. Recently fiber ropes made from polyester (PET) and HMPE have begun to replace large-diameter wire ropes for mooring permanent and temporary platforms in the petroleum industry [2][3]. ...
Conference Paper
One of the limitations of synthetic fiber ropes in industrial uses has been the premature wear of these materials when subjected to continuous bend-over-sheave fatigue. While one-way passage over sheaves is not generally damaging, repeated back-and-forth movement over one part of the rope, as in heave compensation units, can lead to damaging heat buildup and unexpected failure modes. This report details the results of bend-over-sheave fatigue testing on 18 mm diameter fiber ropes conducted at Cortland Cable Company. Cycles-to-failure data is presented for the fiber materials, coatings, and constructions tested to date. Fatigue life was significantly improved by fiber blending and with specialty coatings, resulting in a new braided rope design specifically optimized for bending fatigue (BOB). The BOB design was found to have a significant CTF advantage over aramid constructions and steel wire currently in use today. The importance of test parameters such as sheave design and cycle rate is highlighted.
Article
Full-text available
The current experience for the installation of large production facilities is essentially limited to 5,000ft. Can the technology used today be extended to meet tomorrow's challenges for installing subsea facilities in 10,000ft? This paper will address this question, particularly from the point of view of the offshore installation contractor who will be required to perform the work at these extreme depths. The paper will consider the issues associated with dealing these depths, highlighting technological areas specifically relating to lifting and lowering, pipelay, survey and positioning, and equipment and support vessels. Introduction Over the last 10 years offshore oil and gas exploitation has moved into deeper and deeper water. In the early and mid 1990's the deep water frontiers were in Brazil and Norway in water depths of around 300 m. Currently large field developments are coming on-stream in West Africa in water depths of the order of 1,500 m and in Brazil and the Gulf of Mexico in water depths down to 2,000 m. Offshore installation work in these water depths has been successfully carried out by several installation contractors, using existing ships and equipment which have been extended and upgraded to meet the current deep water challenges. Can this equipment be pushed further to meet the future challenges set by the ultra-deep water fields beyond 3,000m (10,000 ft) ? Before considering this question further and whether or not new concepts for equipment and techniques are required, it is first necessary to review the current state of the art. The following sections address the experiences gained in carrying out deep water field developments specifically offshore West Africa and highlight specific problems and limitations for deep water installation work. Installation of subsea hardware - Current Status Deep water field development work requires that a large amount of hardware is placed and positioned on the seabed. The hardware includes subsea structures such as manifolds, anchors, tie-in spools, and other assorted subsea equipment. Table 1 presents weights and approximate dimensions for typical subsea hardware, which form part of a deep water field development. This paper addresses the issues and challenges as seen from the point of view of an installation contractor and as such hardware such as Christmas trees and BOPs and not considered within the paper. It has been assumed that this type of equipment will be installed by the drilling contractor using a drilling derrick. Table 1 : Typical Subsea Hardware (Available in full paper) Subsea installation work is commonly performed using two different deployment methods :- - For heavy equipment (300 Tonne and beyond) a crane barge is commonly used where the crane is used both for overboarding and lowering the equipment to the seabed. The Seaway Polaris is an example of a crane barge (Figure 1). This type of system is particularly appropriate in greater water depths where a soft landing on the seabed using active heave compensation is required. A more detailed description of this type of crane based lowering system is described in the Section below.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.