This thesis examines a previously unstudied site of interaction: the constituency office. At the constituency office, Members of Parliament (MPs) hold 'MP surgeries', during which they help constituents to solve their personal difficulties. This thesis provides the first analysis of interactions at the constituency office. It is the only place where ordinary citizens can meet their MP; as such, it also provides the first analysis of face-to-face, unmediated interactions between politicians and their constituents. For this study, 12.5 hours of interactional data were recorded at the office of an MP in the United Kingdom, comprising over 80 encounters between office staff, the MP, and their constituents. The MP was of the majority ('government') party at the time of recording. The data were analyzed using conversation analysis (CA), in order to investigate how the social activities of the constituency office were accomplished through interaction.
The first analytic chapter reveals the overall structure of constituency office encounters, as well as examining what constituents say when they call or visit the office, and how they express that they are in need of assistance. This chapter finds that constituents avoid making direct requests of their MP, and instead use narrative descriptions. These descriptions manage interactional challenges including the ‘unknown’ nature of the institution (Stokoe, 2013b), contingency and entitlement (Drew & Curl, 2008), reasonableness and legitimacy (Edwards & Stokoe, 2007; Heritage & Robinson, 2006), and recruitment (Kendrick & Drew, 2016). The second analytic chapter examines how the staff use different offer designs to index different nuances in the offering action, such as asking for permission or confirming a plan. Both the first and second analytic chapters show that systematic deployment of offers help control the direction of the encounters and tacitly instruct constituents as to what services are available.
The third analytic chapter investigates the ostensibly ‘political’ context of the constituency office, and how the MP and constituents raise political topics in conversation. The MP initiated political topics in explicit references to government, in order to provide evidence that the government was aligned with constituents’ interests. The constituents initiated political topics in indirect references to recent policy changes, and avoided implicating the MP in any criticisms. The findings suggest that constituents privilege interactional norms (such as not criticizing a co-present interlocutor) over any potential interest in making political critiques. The final analytic chapter assesses the concept of ‘rapport’, as it is an important concept for MPs who regularly attempt to build relationships to garner ‘personal votes’ with citizens. The chapter shows that it is difficult for both participants and analysts to determine long-term outcomes from local, interactional occurrences in interaction. The chapter also shows that rapport is important for constituents as well, in order to receive good service, but that such ‘client-side’ rapport has never been considered in previous studies.
This thesis supports and enacts recent calls for a nuanced approach to action description (Kendrick & Drew, 2014; Sidnell & Enfield, 2014). The thesis also contributes to the political discourse literature by demonstrating that constituents’ activities at the constituency office are strongly influenced by interactional norms, rather than political attitudes. Finally, overall, this thesis provides a first look inside the ‘black box’ of constituency office encounters, finding them to be primarily a site of service interaction.