... Previous research has shown that the more common preparation methods for academic deans consist of past administrative experiences, on the job training (Gmelch, 2000; Gmelch & Wolverton, 2002; Gmelch, Wolverton, Wolverton, & Sarros, 1999; Land, 2003; J. Montez & Wolverton, 2000; Raines & Squires Alberg, 2003; M. Wolverton, Gmelch, Montez, & Nies, 2001; M. Wolverton, Gmelch, & Wolverton, 2000; M. Wolverton & Gonzales, 2000) and mentoring practices (Allen & Cherrey, 2000; M. Murray, 1991; Nies & Wolverton, 2000; M. Wolverton, Wolverton, & Gmelch, 1998; Zey, 1984). Other, less common, methods include post-appointment professional conferences and/or seminars (Carr, 1999; Fogg, 2005; Gmelch, Wolverton, Wolverton, & Sarros; Greenberg, 2006; M. Wolverton, Montez, & Gmelch), professional training programs (Aziz et al., 2005; McDade, 1988), and advanced degrees in higher education or a related field (Development, 2006; Gmelch, 2002; Gmelch & Wolverton, 2002; Gonzales, Stewart, & Robinson, 2003; J. Montez, 2003; Williams, 2001). Heck, Johnsrud, and Rosser (2000) have defined the leadership dimensions of the academic deanship through seven categories: vision and goal setting, the management of an academic affairs unit, developing and maintaining interpersonal relationships with faculty, staff, and students, communication skills, maintaining and pursuing professional development, research and institutional endeavors, advancing the quality of education of the unit, and supporting and advancing institutional diversity. ...