Content uploaded by Jon Beck
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jon Beck on Dec 23, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
LETTER
Exome sequencing reveals a
novel partial deletion in the
progranulin gene causing
primary progressive aphasia
In 2005, we reported a case of familial
primary progressive aphasia (PPA) in this
journal.
1
The individual in question had a
family history of frontotemporal dementia
(FTD), her brother having behavioural
variant FTD shown to be due to tau-
negative, ubiquitin-positive (FTLD-U)
pathology at postmortem. She was fol-
lowed as part of a research programme
from the age of 51 years, first developing
symptoms of progressive speech disturb-
ance at the age of 55 years. We were able
to demonstrate the emergence of neurop-
sychometric deficits and brain atrophy
prior to symptom onset. Through the use
of voxel compression mapping, we
showed the emergence of very focal,
presymptomatic regional atrophy initially
almost entirely confined to the pars oper-
cularis (figure 1A).
1
Over time, the
atrophy spread through the frontal and
temporal lobes to affect the parietal lobe
and then the right frontal lobe.
Subsequent analysis has shown increase in
left and right hemispheric lobar atrophy
prior to symptom onset, although the
left hemisphere volume loss preceded
and remained more prominent than the
right throughout the disease course
(figure 1B).
At the time of publication, mutations in
the microtubule-associated protein tau
(MAPT) were the only known genetic
cause of disorders within the FTD spec-
trum, and screening for MAPT mutations
was negative. Since then, the progranulin
(GRN) and C9ORF72 genes have been
shown to be major causes of familial
FTD.
2
Her brother’s pathology was subse-
quently reanalysed and reclassified as
FTLD-transactive response DNA-binding
protein (TDP) type A pathology,
3
consist-
ent with either a GRN or C9ORF72
mutation. However, conventional analyses
failed to disclose mutations in either of
these genes in this family.
4–6
In order to investigate this further, DNA
from her brother underwent exome sequen-
cing, performed on genomic DNA using
Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v2
target enrichment kit. Sequencing was per-
formed on an Illumina HiSeq2000 and
achieved an average 30-fold depth-of-cover-
age of target sequence.
7
ExomeDepth
8
compares the read depth data between a
test sample and an aggregate reference set
that combines multiple exomes matched to
the test sample for technical variability
(Software freely available at: http://cran.
r-project.org/web/packages/ExomeDepth/
index.html). Analysis demonstrated a GRN
gene deletion. The red crosses (figure 2)
show the ratio of observed/expected
number of reads for the test sample. The
grey shaded region shows the estimated
99% CI for this observed ratio in the
absence of copy number variation (CNV)
call. The presence of contiguous exons with
read count ratio located outside of the CI is
indicative of a heterozygous deletion in the
GRN gene. GRN exons 0, 2, 5, 9 and 11
were subsequently probed for copy number
variation using multiplex ligation-
dependent probe amplification (MLPA)
analysis with the Medical Research Council
(MRC) Holland kit P275, which is rou-
tinely used for assessing GRN deletions.
910
This confirmed the presence of a novel het-
erozygous deletion of exons 2–11. Test
results show the 50untranslated region of
the gene was present, but could not deter-
mine if exon 12 of GRN was also deleted.
The same deletion was detected in the
proband using MLPA analysis.
While progranulin mutations were not
known to cause frontotemporal lobar
degeneration at the time of our original
report, the clinical features that emerged
during the course of her illness would now
be recognised as being fairly characteristic.
Progranulin mutations are usually asso-
ciated with behavioural variant FTD or
PPA,
23
with combinations of these presen-
tations recognised within the same family.
Neuropsychologically, patients often have
executive dysfunction and early parietal
lobe deficits, with PPA patients having a
non-fluent aphasia with a prominent
anomia. Imaging studies in patients with
established disease typically show promin-
ent asymmetrical atrophy affecting frontal,
temporal and parietal lobes consistent with
neuropsychological findings.
11
Finally, the
pathology, type A TDP-43, would be con-
sistent with that seen in progranulin muta-
tions (and also C9ORF72 expansions).
23
This case serves to illustrate a number
of important points. First, progranulin
Figure 1 MRI changes in the proband: (A) sagittal MRI showing focal anterolateral left frontal lobe atrophy, particularly centred around the pars
opercularis, using voxel compression mapping between the first and second scans (3.4 and 2.1 years prior to symptom onset) (reprinted from
Janssen et al,
1
; (B) changes in left and right hemispheric volume over time.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry December 2013 Vol 84 No 12 1411
PostScript
mutations should always be considered as
a cause of PPA where there is a positive
family history either of PPA or behav-
ioural variant FTD. Second, prominent
asymmetric lobar atrophy on MRI is an
important clue to the presence of a pro-
granulin rather than a MAPT or
C9ORF72 mutation in the context of an
autosomal-dominant family history. Third,
as with other neurodegenerative diseases,
this case shows that focal brain atrophy
precedes symptom onset in genetically
determined forms of FTD; rates of
atrophy may therefore be useful outcome
measures for presymptomatic therapeutic
trials in these disorders. Finally, the fact
that conventional progranulin testing was
negative in this case demonstrates the
power of exome sequencing as a tool to
discover large-scale mutations, such as the
partial deletion seen here, that may not be
found with usual screening methods for
small-scale changes.
Jonathan D Rohrer,
1
Jonathan Beck,
2
Vincent Plagnol,
3
Elizabeth Gordon,
1
Tammaryn Lashley,
4
Tamas Revesz,
4
John C Janssen,
5
Nick C Fox,
1
Jason D Warren,
1
Martin N Rossor,
1
Simon Mead,
2
Jonathan M Schott
1
1
Dementia Research Centre, Department of
Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology,
London, UK
2
MRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative
Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
3
Department of Statistics, Institute of Genetics,
University College London, UK
4
Queen Square Brain Bank, UCL Institute of Neurology,
London, UK
5
Department of Neurology, Chelsea and Westminster
Hospital, London, UK
Correspondence to Dr Jonathan M Schott, Institute
of Neurology –Dementia Research Centre, Queen
Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK;
j.schott@ucl.ac.uk
Acknowledgements This work was funded by the
Medical Research Council UK. The Dementia Research
Centre is an Alzheimer’s Research UK Co-ordinating
Centre and has also received equipment funded by
Alzheimer’s Research UK and Brain Research Trust. JR
is an NIHR clinical lecturer, MR and NF are NIHR senior
investigators, JDW is supported by a Wellcome Trust
Senior Clinical Fellowship, and are researchers at the
NIHR Queen Square Dementia BRU. JS is an NIHR
Clinical Senior Lecturer. This work was supported by
the NIHR Queen Square Dementia BRU.
Contributors JDR wrote the draft of the manuscript
and analysed the imaging data. JB, VP and SM
performed the genetic analyses. TL and TR performed
the pathological analyses. EG performed imaging
analyses. JCJ, JMS, MNR, JDW and NCF performed
patient evaluation. All authors reviewed and
contributed to the final manuscript.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethical approval for the study was
obtained from the National Hospital for Neurology and
Neurosurgery Local Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned;
externally peer reviewed.
Open Access This is an Open Access article
distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build
upon this work, for commercial use, provided the
original work is properly cited. See: http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
To cite Rohrer JD, Beck J, Plagnol V, et al.J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:1411–1412.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:1411–1412.
doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306116
REFERENCES
1 Janssen JC, Schott JM, Cipolotti L, et al. Mapping
the onset and progression of atrophy in familial
frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:162–8.
2 Rohrer JD, Warren JD. Phenotypic signatures of
genetic frontotemporal dementia. Curr Opin Neurol
2011;24:542–9.
3 Rohrer JD, Lashley T, Schott JM, et al. Clinical and
neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in
frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain 2011;134
(Pt 9):2565–81.
4 Beck J, Rohrer JD, Campbell T, et al. A distinct
clinical, neuropsychological and radiological
phenotype is associated with progranulin gene
mutations in a large UK series. Brain 2008;
131(Pt 3):706–20.
5 Rohrer JD, Guerreiro R, Vandrovcova J, et al. The
heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar
degeneration. Neurology 2009;73:1451–6.
6 Mahoney CJ, Beck J, Rohrer JD, et al. Frontotemporal
dementia with the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat
expansion: clinical, neuroanatomical and
neuropathological features. Brain 2012;135(Pt
3):736–50.
7 Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Mackay DS, et al.
Biallelic mutations in PLA2G5, encoding group V
phospholipase A2, cause benign fleck retina. Am J
Hum Genet 2011;89:782–91.
8 Plagnol V, Curtis J, Epstein M, et al. A robust model
for read count data in exome sequencing
experiments and implications for copy number
variant calling. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2747–54.
9 Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, Engelborghs S, et al.
Progranulin locus deletion in frontotemporal
dementia. Hum Mutat 2008;29:53–8.
10 Skoglund L, Ingvast S, Matsui T, et al. No evidence
of PGRN or MAPT gene dosage alterations in a
collection of patients with frontotemporal lobar
degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord
2009;28:471–5.
11 Rohrer JD, Ridgway GR, Modat M, et al. Distinct
profiles of brain atrophy in frontotemporal lobar
degeneration caused by progranulin and tau
mutations. Neuroimage 2010;53:1070–6.
Figure 2 The read count ratio of observed to expected is shown plotted against position in
basepairs along chromosome 17. A reduction in read count ratio to 0.5 and below at the GRN
locus can be seen, and indicate a heterozygous gene deletion.
1412 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry December 2013 Vol 84 No 12
PostScript