Content uploaded by M. Clara P. Amorim
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by M. Clara P. Amorim on Dec 10, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tbio20
Download by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online ISPA] Date: 10 December 2015, At: 08:22
Bioacoustics
The International Journal of Animal Sound and its Recording
ISSN: 0952-4622 (Print) 2165-0586 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tbio20
SHIP NOISE AFFECTS ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION
IN THE LUSITANIAN TOADFISH
RAQUEL O. VASCONCELOS , M. CLARA P. AMORIM & FRIEDRICH LADICH
To cite this article: RAQUEL O. VASCONCELOS , M. CLARA P. AMORIM & FRIEDRICH LADICH
(2008) SHIP NOISE AFFECTS ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION IN THE LUSITANIAN TOADFISH,
Bioacoustics, 17:1-3, 226-228, DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2008.9753827
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2008.9753827
Published online: 13 Apr 2012.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 28
View related articles
226
also
grateful
to
the
castnet
fishermen
from
Hsithe,
Myitkangyi,
and
Myayzun
villages for
their
enthusiastic
help
in
this
research.
REFERENCES
Tun,
T.
(2004). Irrawaddy Dolphins
in
Hsithe-Mandalay Segment
of
the Ayeyawady
River
and
Cooperative Fishing Between Irrawaddy Dolphin, Orcaella brevirostris,
and
Castnet Fishermen in Myanmar. A
report
submitted
to
the
Wildlife Conservation
Society.
Tun,
T.
(2005). Castnet Fisheries in Cooperation with Irrawaddy Dolphins (Ayeyawady
Dolphins)
at
Hsithe, Myitkangyi
and
Myayzun Villages, Mandalay Division, in
Myanmar.
A
report
submitted
to
the
Wildlife Conservation Society.
SHIP
NOISE AFFECTS ACOUSTIC
COMMUNICATION
IN THE LUSITANIAN
TOAD FISH
RAQUEL
0.
VASCONCELOS
1
•
2
,
M.
CLARA
P.
AMORIM
2
,
AND
FRIEDRICH LADICH
3
1
Departamento de Biologia
Animal
e Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade
de
Ciencias
da
Universidade de Lisboa, Bloco C2 Campo Grande, 1749-0161 Lisboa,
Portugal. raquel_ vasconcelos@ispa.pt
2
Unidade de Investiga£;iio em Eco-Etologia, I.S.P.A.,
Rua
Jardim
do Tabaco 34,
1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal. clara.amorim@ispa.pt
3
Department
of
Behavioural Biology, University
of
Vienna, Althanstrasse
14,
1090 Vienna, Austria. friedrich.ladich@univie.ac.at
INTRODUCTION
Ship
noise pollution is
an
increasing
environmental
problem
that
might
affect
the
ecology
and
fitness of
aquatic
organisms.
Most
studies
on
the
effects of
ship
noise
have
focused
on
marine
mammals
or
on
population
assessments
for fisheries (Richardson
et
al. 1995;
Vab0
et
al. 2002).
Only
few efforts
have
been
made
to describe
its
harmful
effects
on
fishes,
in
particular
on
their
acoustic
orientation
and
communication
(Amoser
et
al. 2004; Scholik &
Yan
2002; Wysocki
et
al. 2006).
This
study
investigates
the
implications
of noise
created
by a
ferryboat
on
sound
detectability
in
the
Lusitanian
toadfish,
Halobatrachus didactylus.
This
highly
vocal
batrachoidid
(Dos
Santos
et
al. 2000) occurs
in
intertidal
habitats,
which
are
frequently
influenced
by
human
activity.
Downloaded by [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online ISPA] at 08:22 10 December 2015
227
METHODS
Ambient
and
ferryboat
noises
were
recorded
and
the
sound
pressure
levels
(LLe
)
were
measured
in
the
Tagus
River
estuary
(Portugal)
near
a
to~dfish
nesting
area.
Fish
vocalizations
were
registered
in
the
laboratory
(agonistic
grunts)
and
in
the
field (reproductive
boatwhistles).
Auditory
sensitivity
was
measured
in
toadfish
caught
in
the
estuaries
of
the
Tagus
and
Mira
Rivers (Portugal).
Hearing
thresholds
were
obtained
under
quiet
laboratory
conditions
and
in
the
presence
of
ambient
and
ship
noises
using
the
auditory
evoked
potentials
(AEP)
recording
technique
(Wysocki &
Ladich
2005).
RESULTS
The
Lusitanian
toadfish showed
best
hearing
at
low frequencies
between
50
and
200 Hz (below 100 dB
re
1
J..tPa)
and
a
gradual
sensitivity
decrease
toward
1,000 Hz.
Under
ambient
noise conditions,
hearing
was
slightly
masked
at
lowest frequencies,
particularly
at
50 Hz.
In
the
presence
of
ship
noise,
auditory
thresholds
increased
significantly
up
to 36 dB, especially
within
the
most
sensitive
frequency
range.
Comparisons
between
the
audiograms
measured
under
ambient
noise conditions
and
sound
spectra
of
grunts
and
boatwhistles
showed
that
below 400 Hz,
sound
energies
were
around
23 dB above
the
hearing
thresholds.
This
indicates
that
the
species
can
accurately
perceive conspecific acoustic signals.
In
contrast,
ship
noise decreases
the
ability
to
detect
vocalizations
because
spectral
sound
amplitudes
were
merely
10 dB above
the
hearing
curve.
DISCUSSION
Our
data
confirmed
that
the
Lusitanian
toadfish is a
hearing
generalist
and
that
main
sound
energies
are
found
in
the
most
sensitive
hearing
range,
similar
to
other
batrachoidids
(e.g., Opsanus
tau;
Fay
&
Edds-Walton
1997). Moreover,
this
investigation
provides
first evidence
that
hearing
in
fishes is
masked
by
ship
noise
and
that
acoustic
communication
in
the
Lusitanian
toadfish
might
be
impaired
in
human-altered
coastal
environments.
Masked
hearing
and
deteriorated
sound
characteristics
might
result
in
misleading
information
that
can
affect
spacing
between
nesting
males, female
attraction,
and
mate
choice.
Downloaded by [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online ISPA] at 08:22 10 December 2015
228
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This
research
was
supported
by MCTES,
Portugal
(FCT
Grants
SFRH/
BM/21774/2005 to R.O.V.
and
SFRH/BPD/14570 to M.C.P.A.
and
a
pluriannual
programme
UI&D 31/94/FCT)
and
the
Austrian
Science
Fund
(Grant
17263 to F.L.).
REFERENCES
Amoser, S., Wysocki, L. E., & Ladich, F. (2003). Noise em1sswn
during
the
first
powerboat
race
in
an
Alpine
lake
and
potential
impact
on
fish
communities.
J.
Acoust. Soc.
Am.
116,
3789-3797.
Dos
Santos,
M. E., Modesto, T.,
Matos,
R.
J.,
Grober, M. S., Oliveira,
R.
F., &
Canario,
A. (2000).
Sound
production
by
the
Lusitanian
toadfish, Halobatrachus didactylus.
Bioacoustics
10, 309-321.
Fay,
R.
R., &
Edds-Walton,
P. L. (1997).
Diversity
in
frequency
properties
of
saccular
afferents
of
the
toadfish, Opsanus tau. Hear. Res. 113, 235-246.
Richardson,
W.
J.,
Greene,
C.
R.,
Malme,
C.
1., & Thomson, D. H. (1995). Marine
Mammals
and
Noise.
New
York: Academic
Press.
Scholik, A. R., &
Yan,
H.
Y.
(2002). Effects
of
boat
engine
noise
on
the
auditory
sensitivity
of
the
fathead
minnow,
Pimephales promelas. Environ. Biol. Fishes 63,
203-209.
Vab0,
R., Olsen, K., &
Huse,
J.
(2002).
The
effect of
vessel
avoidance
of
wintering
Norwegian
spring
spawning
herring.
Fish. Res. 58, 59-77.
Wysocki, L. E.,
Dittami,
J.
P., & Ladich, F. (2006).
Ship
noise
and
cortisol
secretion
in
European
freshwater
fishes. Biol. Conserv.
128,
501-508.
Wysocki, L. E., & Ladich, F. (2005).
Hearing
in
fishes
under
noise conditions.
J.
Assoc.
Res. Otolaryngol.
6, 28-36.
INTERVESSEL COMPARISON OF WALLEYE
POLLOCK ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER RECORDED
BY A
NOISE-REDUCED AND A CONVENTIONAL
RESEARCH
VESSEL
ALEX
DE
ROBERTISl,
VIDAR
HJELLVIK
2
,
NEAL
J.
WILLIAMSON
3
,
AND
CHRISTOPHER
D. WILSON4
1
•
3
•
4
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Alaska
Fisheries Science Center, Resource
Assessment
and
Conservation Engineering Division, 7600
Sand
Point Way NE,
Seattle
WA
98115, USA.
1
alex.derobertis@noaa.gov,
3
neal.williamson@noaa.gov,
4
chris. wilson@noaa.gov
2
Norwegian Institute
of
Public Health, P.O. Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403, Oslo,
Norway. vidar.hjellvik@fhi.no
INTRODUCTION
Avoidance of
approaching
research
vessels
by
fish is
an
important
source of
uncertainty
in
fisheries
resource
surveys. Vessels produce
Downloaded by [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online ISPA] at 08:22 10 December 2015