ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This paper reviews the role of cannabis in diabetes. Cannabis is by far the most commonly used illicit drug in Britain, though its use may be declining. There are an estimated 50,000—100,000 people with diabetes using cannabis, with an unknown number using the drug for self-medication. The evidence of the effects of cannabis on diabetes is complex, ranging from anecdotal reports of benefits and harms to experimental research on cannabinoids. The endocannabinoid system appears to have a role in the regulation of body weight and food intake, and the development of hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia. In experimental models, the main psychoactive constituent of herbal cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, has been shown to interfere with both the action of insulin and its release. The paper also considers the effects of cannabis on complications of diabetes. Experimental work has suggested a mechanism to reduce neuropathy but the only double-blind clinical trial to date of a cannabis-based drug found no difference in the ability of the cannabis-based product to relieve neuropathic pain when compared with placebo. In conclusion, new insights into the role of cannabis and cannabinoids in diabetes are emerging from this developing field of research.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular
The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/1474651410385860
2010 10: 267British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease
Martin Frisher, Simon White, Gabor Varbiro, Carolyn Voisey, Dhaya Perumal, Ilana Crome, Nazmeen Khideja and James
The role of cannabis and cannabinoids in diabetes
Published by:
can be found at:The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseAdditional services and information for Alerts:
What is This?
- Dec 21, 2010Version of Record >>
by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from by guest on October 11, 2013dvd.sagepub.comDownloaded from
his paper reviews the role of cannabis in diabetes.
Cannabis is by far the most commonly used illicit
drug in Britain, though its use may be declining.
There are an estimated 50,000–100,000 people with dia-
betes using cannabis, with an unknown number using
the drug for self-medication. The evidence of the effects
of cannabis on diabetes is complex, ranging from anec-
dotal reports of benefits and harms to experimental
research on cannabinoids. The endocannabinoid system
appears to have a role in the regulation of body weight
and food intake, and the development of hypergly-
caemia, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia. In experi-
mental models, the main psychoactive constituent of
herbal cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, has been
shown to interfere with both the action of insulin and its
release. The paper also considers the effects of cannabis
on complications of diabetes. Experimental work has
suggested a mechanism to reduce neuropathy but the
only double-blind clinical trial to date of a cannabis-
based drug found no difference in the ability of the
cannabis-based product to relieve neuropathic pain
when compared with placebo. In conclusion, new insights
into the role of cannabis and cannabinoids in diabetes
are emerging from this developing field of research.
Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2010;10:267-273.
Key words: cannabis, cannabinoid, diabetes, endocannabinoid.
There have been claims that cannabis and its derivative com-
pounds have medicinal use including use for diabetes. However,
cannabis (with some limited exceptions discussed below) has
no current status as a medicine since it became illegal in the
UK under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1925. Cannabis is now
classified as a ‘class B’ drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act
1971. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on
the relationship between cannabis and diabetes. The paper is
divided into three sections: (1) epidemiology of cannabis and
diabetes, (2) the effects of cannabis on diabetes and (3) the
effects of cannabis on diabetic complications.
Although cannabis is by far the most commonly used illicit
drug in the UK,
the term ‘cannabis’ applies to a wide range of
substances. Cannabis refers to a genus of flowering plants that
includes three species: cannabis sativa, cannabis indica and can-
nabis ruderalis.
The taxonomy of cannabis is somewhat in dispute,
however most now regard the genus cannabis to belong to the
Hemp family, Cannabacea.
These plants that have grown wild
throughout the world for centuries and have had various uses,
such as to make rope and textiles, as a medicinal herb and as
a recreational drug.
Cannabis plants produce cannabinoids,
although there are also synthetic cannabinoids which are not
found in cannabis plants.
To date, over 60 cannabinoids have
been isolated, of which THC is considered to be the primary psy-
choactive component of the plant.
The amount of THC ingredient
in herbal cannabis varies from 1% up to 15%, while skunk, can
The role of cannabis and cannabinoids in
© The Author(s), 2010. Reprints and permissions: 10.1177/1474651410385860 267
School of Pharmacy, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Academic Psychiatry, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Correspondence to: Martin Frisher
School of Pharmacy and Medicines Management, Keele University,
Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Tel: +44(0)1782 733 568; Fax: +44(0)1782 713 586
Abbreviations and acronyms
i] intracellular calcium transients
CBD cannabidiol
GLUT glucose transporter gene
HDL high-density lipoprotein
ICAM inter-cellular adhesion molecule
IFN interferon
IGF-I insulin-like growth factor-I
IL interleukin
IP3 inositol trisphosphate
IRS insulin receptor substrate
NOD non-obese diabetic
PPAR peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor
RIO-Diabetes Rimonabant in type 2 diabetes
RIO-Europe Rimonabant In Obesity – Europe
STZ streptozotocin
Th T helper cell
THC Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
TGF transforming growth factor
TNF tumour necrosis factor
TZD thiazolidinedione/glitazone
VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor
have up to 20% (skunk refers to a range of stronger types of can-
nabis, grown either under artificial lights or in a greenhouse, often
using hydroponic techniques).
Despite concerns about increased
potency, the evidence is mixed, with recent studies indicating
broadly similar ranges of potency over the last 10 years.
The only cannabinoids available as medicines in the UK are
nabilone (a synthetic cannabinoid) and Sativex (cannabis plant
extract containing THC and CBD) but neither are licensed for use
in diabetes. Nabilon is licensed for nausea and vomiting caused
by cytotoxic chemotherapy that is unresponsive to conventional
antiemetics, while Sative was granted a product licence in June
2010 as an add-on treatment for symptom improvement in
multiple sclerosis patients with moderate to severe spasticity.
Rimonabant (an inverse agonist for the cannabinoid receptor
), which had been licensed as an appetite suppressant, was
withdrawn from the market in 2009 over concerns about psychi-
atric side effects (particularly depression and suicidal ideation).
1. Epidemiology of cannabis and diabetes
In England, 9.0% of school pupils in 2007 aged 11–15 used
cannabis in the last year, down from 13.4% in 2001.
adults aged 16–59 use in the last year was 7.9% in 2008–
2009 compared with 10.6% in 2001–2002.
Despite these
reductions, cannabis is by far the most widely used illicit drug
in the UK. On the basis of these figures, 2.5 million people are
estimated to have used cannabis in the last year in the UK. The
Independent Drug Monitoring Unit estimated there to be over
3 million regular users in 2004.
The prevalence of diabetes in the UK in 2005 was 4.3%
(type 1, 0.4%; type 2, 3.9%) among people aged 10–79.
Prevalence is linearly related to age and most type 2 diabetic
patients are diagnosed in their mid-40s.
Table 1
that most cannabis users are in their 20s and 30s while most
diabetic patients are 45 and over. Extrapolating these trends
would suggest there to be between 50,000 and 100,000 dia-
betic patients in the UK who have used cannabis in the last
year (assuming that diabetic patients’ use of cannabis is similar
to use reported by the general population).
Figure 1 shows that diabetes has increased between 2003
and 2006 when cannabis use in England was declining. At a
population level, there does not appear to be any connection
between use of cannabis and diabetes. However, as discussed
below (in sections 2 and 3), it is possible that there could be
some link that is not revealed by the crude prevalence rates
shown in figure 1.
Patterns of cannabis use
Surveys only provide data on frequency of cannabis use, but as
pointed out in the classic book, Drug Set and Setting,
the ‘set’, that is, the personality of the user, and the setting
in which the drug is used are of central importance. Dutch
researchers have proposed three main types of cannabis use.
Cluster 1 consists mainly of young males (mean age 22.7 years)
who use cannabis frequently and are seeking high levels of
intoxication. Cluster II consists mainly of older people (mean
age 27.7 years) of both sexes who seek moderate levels of
intoxication. They adjust their smoking behaviour in response
to the potency of the cannabis they are using. Cluster III con-
sists of mature cannabis smokers (mean age 37.5 years) whose
consumption is consistently high and whose pattern of use is
largely unaffected by the strength of the product. There is also
a possible fourth cluster of medicinal cannabis users. Although
there are many issues surrounding the definition of ‘medicinal
cannabis use’, a Canadian study suggested that 2% of the
general population use marijuana for medical purposes.
Table 1. Prevalence of self reported cannabis use and diabetes by
Cannabis Diabetes
Prevalence (%) of cannabis
in England and Wales,
Prevalence (%) of
diagnosed diabetes
in England, 2006
Ageband Ageband
16–19 18.3 16–24 0.8
20–24 19.1 25–34 1.2
25–29 12.1 35–44 1.8
30–34 8.2 45–54 4.8
35–44 4.6 55–64 7.2
45–54 2.4 65–74 12.9
55–59 1.1 75+ 11.7
Sex Sex
Men 10.6 Men 5.6
Women 5.2 Women 4.2
Note: agebands for cannabis and diabetes do not correspond.
Figure 1. Self-reported rates of cannabis use and diabetes in England,
selected years 1993–2006
1993 1994 1998 2003 2006
% of population
Self-reported diagnosis of either type 1 or type 2
Self-reported using cannabis in last year (aged 16–59)
present there are no data to indicate if this figure applies to
diabetic patients in Canada only, or elsewhere. As noted in this
paper, there are anecdotal reports of medicinal use by diabetic
pati ents. Another factor that may be important is the increase
in cannabis dependency particularly in the 18–24-year group in
the UK. Indeed over 90% of young people who access specialist
drug/alcohol services have problems with alcohol or cannabis.
Although this paper is concerned with cannabis, the vast
majority of cannabis use in the UK is in combination with
tobacco, which is known to be especially harmful to people
with diabetes. In a qualitative study of young cannabis users
several reported how smoking joints had been a ‘gateway’ to
smoking cigarettes. While most wanted to quit smoking ciga-
rettes, cannabis use reinforced their cigarette smoking and few
wanted to stop using cannabis.
Cannabis harm and schizophrenia: lessons for
diabetes research?
The debate surrounding the role of cannabis as a cause of
schizophrenia illustrates the complexities of drawing firm con-
clusions on cannabis-related harm. A recent review
‘cannabis use may be an independent risk factor for the devel-
opment of psychotic disorders’. Increasing cannabis use in the
1990s has been linked to increased incidence of psychoses.
However, others have concluded that ‘the contentious issue of
whether cannabis use can cause serious psychotic disorders that
would not otherwise have occurred cannot be answered from
the existing data.’
It has been suggested that rising cannabis
use in the UK over the 30 years between 1970 and 2000, would
have led to an increase in the schizophrenia prevalence of 19%
between 1990 and 2010, assuming increased risk among can-
nabis users.
However, between 1996 and 2005 the incidence
and prevalence of schizophrenia and psychoses were either
stable or declining in the UK,
casting doubt on the causal
model. However, the issue remains controversial with different
methodologies, populations and exposures (e.g. type and
frequency of cannabis) producing a range of interpretations.
2. Effects of cannabis on diabetes
The previous section raises the issue of patients using cannabis to
self-medicate for certain conditions.
There are well-documented
reports of cannabis use leading to reduced headache, migraine
and post-surgery pain.
However, in relation to diabetes, there are
only anecdotal reports of cannabis use reducing stress levels and
blood sugar levels.
There are also numerous websites that advocate or support
medical uses of cannabis, often as part of wider campaigns
concerning cannabis use. In the majority of cases the claims that
are made about the beneficial effects in diabetes appear to be
unsubstantiated, disingenuous or inaccurate. Claims are often
not supported by references at all, or are supported by refer-
ences of uncertain quality. In other cases, claims are made that
appear to represent a partial but wholly misleading interpreta-
tion of study findings. An example of this is the claim that can-
nabis use can prevent diabetes, often supported (if referenced
at all) by citing experimental animal studies that used CBD (usu-
ally only present in small quantities in herbal cannabis). Such
animal studies, for example those by Weiss and colleagues,
make no such claims for cannabis.
The evidence for whether herbal cannabis has beneficial or
adverse effects in diabetes remains inconclusive. Various web-
sites make anecdotal reports about cannabis having beneficial
effects, such as stabilising or lowering blood sugar.
Some also
report adverse effects, such as Stark,
who comments that
cannabis may cause ‘decreased judgement’ and increased appe-
tite, but offers no additional information about these effects
(e.g. whether judgement’ includes awareness of impending
However, physiological and pharmacological
studies do not provide unequivocal support for anecdotal reports
and claims of benefit of herbal cannabis in diabetes; rather, if
anything, they point to the situation being highly complex.
THC, the major active component of herbal cannabis, appears
to principally exert its pharmacological action by stimulating the
endocannabinoid system, via the cannabinoid cell-surface recep-
tors CB1 and CB2. This system appears to have a role in the
regulation of body weight and food intake, and the development
of hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia.
In various experimental models THC was shown to interfere
with both the action of insulin and its release. In type 2 diabe-
tes the glucose uptake of cells is impaired due to insulin resis-
tance. THC can increase insulin-induced glucose uptake, as
demonstrated in a study in cultured adipocytes.
It was also
shown that TNFa affects the effectiveness of insulin on glucose
uptake by interfering with insulin signalling,
and the expres-
sion of GLUT4 in adipocytes.
THC has been demonstrated to
decrease the level of TNFa in various experimental models.
Studies have also demonstrated the increased gene expression
of IRS-1, IRS-2 and GLUT4 by THC, suggesting that this com-
pound exhibits an insulin-sensitising effect.
receptors (CB1 and CB2 receptors as well as other yet unclassi-
fied receptors) stimulate intracellular calcium transients [Ca
leading to the release of insulin.
In a study using RINm5F rat
insulinoma β-cells, it was shown that CB1 and CB2 receptor
agonists stimulate insulin secretion via the phosphatidyl inositol–
phospholipase-C pathway and the mobilisation of [Ca2+]i
through IP3 receptors.
Furthermore, THC stimulated the
release of insulin from rat pancreatic islet cells by increasing the
activity of lipooxygenase and by accelerating the metabolism of
arachidonic acid. Inhibition of lipooxygenase (with inhibitor
3-amino-1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-2-pyrazoline hydrochlo-
ride) inhibited insulin release in cells exposed to either glucose
or THC.
THC was also shown to affect the expression of beta-
type TGF (TGF-β1, β2 and β3) as well as the expression of IGF-I
in mice.
It is also likely that THC enhances insulin action.
Although these data suggest that cannabis could impact on
glucose metabolism and the diabetic patient by simultaneously
increasing the expression and release of insulin from the pan-
creatic β-cells and also by sensitising the peripheral tissues to
enhance glucose uptake, the supporting evidence is based on
studies carried out in cultured cells and not in diabetic patients.
Other mechanisms have also been proposed. In a study using
CBD, a non-psychoactive cannabinoid, the development of dia-
betes in NOD mice was prevented.
CBD treatment of mice
with latent diabetes or with initial symptoms of diabetes showed
improvement in disease manifestation.
While no direct effect
of CBD on glucose levels in the blood were found, CBD treat-
ment inhibited IL-12 production by splenocytes. This cytokine
plays a major role in autoimmunity including diabetes. Also
shown in a prior study, pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFN-g and
TFNa were reduced and destruction of pancreatic islets inhibited.
These data point possibly to an immunomodulatory mechanism
shifting the immune response from Th1 to Th2 dominance.
Recently, therapeutic actions of cannabinoids on the nuclear
receptor superfamily ,the PPARs, have also been suggested.
PPARs regulate cell differentiation and lipid metabolism.
in particular, plays a role in the regulation of adipocyte formation,
insulin sensitivity and inflammation.
The TZDs, ligands of PPARg,
are used clinically in the management of type 2 diabetes to
improve insulin sensitivity. The side-effect profile of the TZDs
(weight gain, oedema and increased plasma lipoproteins)
led to suggestions that partial or weak agonists may be beneficial
for low-level PPARg activation. Endogenous, phytoderived or
synthetic cannabinoids that do not activate PPARs to the same
degree as the current TZDs may therefore prove successful.
In human studies stimulation of CB1 receptors (e.g. by THC,
see table 2) has been shown to cause increased food intake,
as well as mediating the psychoactive effects of cannabis.
Blockade of these receptors, such as by treatment with the
selective CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant, has been shown
to have beneficial effects on diabetes, as well as causing weight
loss. In the RIO-Europe trial, which involved 1,507 obese but
non-diabetic patients, rimonabant significantly reduced waist
circumference, triglycerides and insulin resistance, and increased
The RIO-Diabetes trial found that in obese or
type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on metformin
and sulphonylureas, rimonabant also reduced glycosylated
haemoglobin, as well as body weight.
However, as noted
above rimonabant was withdrawn from the UK market in 2009
and there are now no CB1 receptor antagonists commercially
available for human use in the UK.
In contrast to CB1 receptor stimulation, CB2 receptors are
thought to have an anti-inflammatory effect (mediated by the
modulation of cytokine production) when stimulated, for exam-
ple by THC. Steffens and colleagues
found that low-dose
administration of THC reduced the progression of atherosclerosis
(which is characterised by inflammation) in an experimental
mouse model. This effect appeared to have been mediated by
CB2 receptors, as it was not seen in mice that had been pre-
treated with a CB2 receptor antagonist and the dose of THC used
was less than would usually stimulate central CB1 receptors.
However, as Roth argues
it would be very hard to achieve this
effect by smoking cannabis, since the blood concentration of
THC required was found to be within a very narrow range (higher
and lower concentrations were ineffective). It is also unknown
whether this effect could be replicated in humans, given that
there are differences between the mouse model and human
Similarly, it is not known what effect this may
have on the development of coronary heart disease or type 2
diabetes in humans. However, these findings should also be seen
in the light of a recent review on cannabis harm, which did not
specifically mention diabetes, but noted that cannabis use may be
a risk for coronary events, especially in those with pre-existing
cardiovascular disease.
This is potentially important since CHD
causes almost 60% of deaths among diabetic patients.
Table 2. Summary of reported clinical effects of cannabinoids on type 2 diabetes in humans
Clinical effect Cannabinoid Proposed mechanism of action Evidence
Reduction in fasting plasma glucose,
fasting plasma insulin and insulin
resistance in non-diabetic patients
Rimonabant CB1 antagonism (i.e. suppression of
endocannabinoid overactivity)
RIO-Europe RCT: 20 mg daily rimonabant vs.
placebo in 1,507 obese patients (either BMI 30
or BMI 27 + dyslipidaemia or hBP or both)
Reduces HbA
in overweight or
obese diabetic patients
Rimonabant CB1 antagonism (i.e. suppression of
endocannabinoid overactivity)
RIO-Diabetes RCT: 5 mg or 20 mg daily
rimonabant vs placebo in 1,047 overweight or
obese type 2 diabetic patients on metformin or
sulphonylurea monotherapy and hypocaloric diet
Analgesia (but no more efficacious
than placebo) in painful DPN
Sativex (THC and CBD) Insufficiently understood RCT of Sativex vs placebo in 30 patients with DPN
found significant change in pain score in both
groups but difference in quality of life assessments
Depression appeared to be a major confounder
Key: BMI = body mass index; BP = blood pressure; CBD = cannabidiol; DPN = diabetic peripheral neuropathy; HbA
= glycosylated haemoglobin;
RCT = randomised controlled trial; RIO-Diabetes = Rimonabant in type 2 diabetes; RIO-Europe = Rimonabant In Obesity – Europe;
THC = Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
In short, there is mounting evidence pointing to dysfunc-
tion of the endocannabinoid system having an important role
in the development of type 2 diabetes and obesity.
effectively targeting this system to treat or prevent type 2 dia-
betes appears to be far more likely with individual cannabinoids
than herbal cannabis. This equally appears to be the case with
cannabinoids being used in the treatment and prevention of
the complications of diabetes, as this review will now consider.
3. Effects of cannabis on complications of diabetes.
Key complications observed in diabetic patients result from
micro- and macro-vasculature changes, leading to problems
such as cardiovascular disease, retinopathy and nephropathy.
In this section, we aim to review the literature regarding each of
these three complications and, where appropriate, make links
between animal and human data.
Neuropathy is a commonly encountered complication of diabe-
tes and can manifest in any of the body systems, resulting in
numbness, pain and weakness. Protection against oxidative
stress has been implicated as being important in reducing neu-
ropathy in experimental settings. In STZ-induced diabetic rats,
C. sativa extract increased the level of reduced glutathione in the
liver, resulting in a significant reduction in liver lipid peroxidation,
in addition to relieving mechanical allodynia, when administered
In direct contrast to these findings, a double-blind
clinical trial of Sativex (which contains THC and CBD) found no
difference in the ability of the cannabis-based product to relieve
neuropathic pain when compared with placebo.
Of note were
the observations that depression influenced the baseline pain
scores and that patients showed improvement of symptoms
regardless of the treatment regimen, which demonstrates the
strong association of depression with pain perception.
Retinopathy in diabetic patients is the leading cause of prevent-
able blindness in people of working age and is associated with
an increased risk of other vascular complications including
coronary heart disease and stroke.
Research in rat models of
diabetes has demonstrated that the cannabinoid CBD exerts
protection against damage to the blood–brain barrier during
the initial stages of diabetes. This protection appears to be
linked to a reduction in expression of inflammatory and adhe-
sion molecules including TNF and ICAM-1, among others,
in common with the immunomodulatory functions previously
attributed to CBD where a switch from Th1 to Th2 dominance
was observed in NOD mice.
It is essential to note, however,
that the levels of CBD found in herbal cannabis are very low so
its relevance to the clinical management of retinopathy remains
unclear at this time.
Cardiovascular complications
Diabetic patients presenting with micro- and macro-vascular
complications reportedly show significant increases in serum
VEGF concentration, compared with those patients who did not
present with these symptoms.
In addition, increased serum
levels of VEGF are observed in diabetic patients compared with
controls, and also in diabetic patients suffering with proliferative
retinopathy compared with those without this complication.
Cannabinoid treatment decreased serum VEGF levels, the result-
ing reduction in VEGF leading to an improvement of symptoms
for the patient. VEGF is one of a profile of cytokines/inflammatory
mediators whose expression is attenuated by treatment with
other cytokines showing a significant reduction in serum
level on CBD treatment include IFNg, TNFa and Th1-associated
cytokines produced by activated T-lymphocytes in vitro.
CBD treatment appeared to induce a cytokine bias away from
the Th1 type, favouring Th2 cytokines such as IL-10. In parallel
with this change in cytokine profile, insulitis was reduced in the
pancreatic islets of treated NOD mice compared with controls.
Taken together, these results suggest an immunomodulatory
role for cannabinoids in addition to their previously documented
anti-inflammatory effects.
This review has demonstrated that the evidence relating
cannabis to diabetes is highly complex and of variable quality.
Some evidence is anecdotal, while some is experimental (i.e.
in vitro) and difficult to extrapolate to humans. The issue of
standardisation of the illicit drug harms has been in the spot-
light since the publication in The Lancet of ‘development of a
rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse’
in which cannabis is ranked at the lower end of the harm
spectrum. With regard to herbal cannabis, the potential risks
and benefits for diabetic patients remain unquantified at the
present time. Cannabinoids appear to affect biochemical path-
ways associated with diabetes but it is too early to say whether
this will lead to new treatments.
1. Hoare J, Flatley J. Drug Misuse Declared: Findings from the 2007/08
British Crime Survey, England and Wales. London: Home Office, 2008.
2. Anonymous. Marijuana.
(Accessed 20 August 2010)
Key messages
There may be 50,000–100,000 diabetic patients in the
UK who use cannabis
Herbal cannabis use has been linked to harms and
benefits for diabetic patients
Experimental research indicates that the endocannabinoid
system has a role in mechanisms central to diabetes
New insights into the relationship between cannabis,
cannabinoids and diabetes are emerging
3. Schultes RE, Hofmann A, Rätsch C. The nectar of delight. In: Plants of the
Gods, 2nd edn (Healing Arts Press, Rochester, Vermont, 2001) 92-101.
4. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Cannabis and mental health. www.
aspx. (Accessed 20 August 2010)
5. Frank M. The Marijuana Grower’s Guide. London: Atlantic Books, 1988.
6. Downer EJ, Campbell, VA. Phytocannabinoids, CNS cells and develop-
ment: A dead issue? Drug Alcohol Rev 2010;29:91-8.
7. Hardwick S, King L. Cannabis Potency Study. London: Home Office,
8. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Sativex
Oromucuscal spray. London: MHRA, 2010.
9. Fong TM, Heymsfield SB. Cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonists:
current understanding of mechanism of action and unanswered ques-
tions. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;33:947-55.
10. European Medicines Agency. Acomplia (rimonabant): withdrawal of the
marketing authorization in the European Union. London: EMEA, 2009
11. Diment E, Harris J, Jotangia D et al. Smoking, drinking and drug use
among young people in England in 2008. London: NHS Information
Centre for Health and Social Care, 2009.
12. Hoare J. Drug Misuse Declared: Findings from the 2008/09 British
Crime Survey England and Wales. London: Home Office, 2010.
13. Independent Drug Monitoring Unit.
britain.htm. (Accessed 20 August 2010).
14. Masso Gonzalez EL, Johansson S, Wallander MA , Garcia Rodriguez LA.
Trends in the prevalence and incidence of diabetes in the UK: 1996–
2005. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63:332-6.
15. Koopman RJ, Mainous AG III, Diaz VA, Geesey ME. Changes in age at
diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States, 1988 to
2000. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:60-3.
16. Nutt D, King LA, Saulsbury W, Blakemore C. Development of a rational
scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet 2007;
17. Craig R, Mindell J (eds). Health Survey for England 2006: Volume 1
Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Factors in Adults. London: The NHS
Information Centre for Health and Social Care, 2008.
18. Zinberg N. Drug, Set, and Setting. New Haven: Yale University, 1984.
19. Advisory Committee on the Misuse of Drugs. Cannabis: Classification
and Public Health. 2008.
acmd-cannabis-report-2008. (Accessed 20 August 2010).
20. Anonymous. How many people in the US use medical marijuana?
001199 (Accessed 20 August 2010).
21. National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse. NTA business plan
2010–11. London: NTA, 2010.
22. Amos A, Wiltshire S, Bostock Y, Haw S, McNeill A. ‘You can’t go with-
out a need it for your hash’: a qualitative exploration of
smoking, cannabis and young people. Addiction 2004;99:77-81.
23. Le Bec PY, Fatséas M, Denis C et al. Cannabis and psychosis: search of
a causal link through a critical and systematic review. Encephale 2009;
24. McLaren J, Silins E, Hutchinson D et al. Assessing evidence for a causal
link between cannabis and psychosis: A review of cohort studies. Int J
Drug Policy 2010;21:10-19.
25. Hickman M, Vickerman P, Macleod J et al. Cannabis and schizophrenia:
model projections of the impact of the rise in cannabis use on historical
and future trends in schizophrenia in England and Wales. Addiction
26. Frisher M, Crome I, Martino O, Croft P. Assessing the impact of can-
nabis use on trends in diagnosed schizophrenia in the United Kingdom
from 1996 to 2005. Schizophr Res 2009 ;113:123-8.
27. Independent Drug Monitoring Unit. Cannabis and Stress Anxiety. http:// (Accessed 20 August 2010).
28. Weiss L, Zeira M, Reich S, et al. Cannabidiol lowers incidence of diabe-
tes in non-obese mice. Autoimmunity 2006;39:143-51.
29. Grinspoon L, Bakalar J. Shared experiences. Diabetes by Anonymous. (Accessed 14 July
30. Stark G. Cannabis and Diabetes.
bis-diabetes. (Accessed 14 July 2010).
31. Nogueiras R, Veyrat-Durebex C, Suchanek P et al. Peripheral, but not
central, CB1 antagonism provides food intake-independent benefits in
diet-induced obese rats. Diabetes 2008;57:2977-91.
32. Matias I, Gonthier M, Orlando P et al. Regulation, function and dys-
regulation of endocannabinoids in models of adipose and β-pancreatic
cells in obesity and hyperglycaemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:
33. Roth M. Marijuana and your heart. Nature 2005;434:708-09.
34. Scherer T, Buettner C. The dysregulation of the endocannabinoid
system in diabesity: a tricky problem. J Molec Med 2009;87:663-8.
35. Gallanta M, Odei-Addoa F, Frosta CL, Levendal R-A. Biological effects
of THC and a lipophilic cannabis extract on normal and insulin resistant
3T3-L1 adipocytes. Phytomedicine 2009;16:942-9.
36. Solomon SS, Odunusi O, Carrigan D et al. TNF-alpha inhibits insulin
action in liver and adipose tissue: A model of metabolic syndrome.
Horm Metab Res 2010;42:115-21.
37. Stephens JM, Lee J, Pilch PF. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced
insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes is accompanied by a loss
of insulin receptor substrate-1 and GLUT4 expression without a
loss of insulin receptor-mediated signal transduction. J Biol Chem
38. Klein TW, Lane B, Newton CA, Friedman H. The cannabinoid system
and cytokine network. Exp Biol Med 2000;225:1-8.
39. Matias I, Gonthier M, Orlando P et al. Regulation, function and dys-
regulation of endocannabinoids in models of adopise and β-pancreatic
cells in obesity and hyperglycaemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:
40. De Petrocellis L, Marini P, Matias I et al. Mechanisms for the coupling
of cannabinoid receptors to intracellular calcium mobilization in rat
insulinoma beta-cells. Exp Cell Res 2007;313:2993-3004.
41. Laychock SG, Hoffman JM, Meisel E, Bilgin S. Pancreatic islet arachi-
donic acid turnover and metabolism and insulin release in response to
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Biochem Pharmacol 1986;35:2003-8.
42. Das SK, Paria BC, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Effects of 9-ene-
tetrahydrocannabinol on expression of beta-type transforming growth
factors, insulin-like growth factor-I and c-myc genes in the mouse
uterus. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1993;45:459-65.
43. Mechoulam R, Peters M, Murillo-Rodriguez E, Hanus LO. Cannabidiol:
recent advances. Chem Biodivers 2007;4:1678-92.
44. Zuardi AW. Cannabidiol: from an inactive cannabinoid to a drug with
wide spectrum of action. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2008;30: 271-80.
45. Bouaboula M, Hilairet S, Marchand J et al. Anandamide induced
PPARgamma transcriptional activation and 3T3-L1 preadipocyte
differentiation. Eur J Pharmacol 2005;517:174-81.
46. O’Sullivan SE. Cannabinoids go nuclear: evidence for activation of
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2007;152:
47. Fievet C, Fruchart JC, Staels B. PPARalpha and PPARgamma dual ago-
nists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.
Curr Opin Pharmacol 2006;6:606-14.
48. Gelman L, Feige JN, Desvergne B. Molecular basis of selective
PPARgamma modulation for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Biochim
Biophys Acta 2007;1771:1094-107.
49. Van Gaal L, Rissanen A, Scheen A et al. Effects of the cannabinoid-1
receptor blocker rimonabant on weight reduction and cardiovascular
risk factors in overweight patients: 1 year experience from the RIO-
Europe study. Lancet 2005;365:1389-97.
50. Scheen A, Finer N, Hollander P et al. Efficacy and tolerability of
rimonabant in overweight or obese patients with type-2 diabetes: a
randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:1660-72.
51. Steffens S, Veillard N, Arnaud C et al. Low dose oral cannabinoid
therapy reduces progression of atherosclerosis in mice. Nature 2005;
52. Winstock AR, Ford C, Witton J. Assessment and management of
cannabis use disorders in primary care. BMJ 2010;340:c1571.
53. Tan MH. Diabetes and coronary heart disease. Diabetes Spectrum
54. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the
Framingham study. Circulation 1979;59:8-13.
55. Takeda M, Mori F, Yoshida A et al. Constitutive nitric oxide synthase
is associated with retinal vascular permeability in early diabetic rats.
Diabetologia 2001;44:1043-50.
56. Adamis AP, Miller JW, Bernal MT et al. Increased vascular endothelial
growth factor levels in the vitreous of eyes with proliferative diabetic
retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 18:445-50.
57. Comelli F, Bettoni I, Colleoni M et al. Beneficial effects of a Cannabis
sativa extract treatment on diabetes-induced neuropathy and oxidative
stress. Phytother Res 2009;23:1678-84.
58. Selvarajah D, Gandhi R, Emery CJ, Tesfaye S. Randomized placebo-
controlled double-blind clinical trial of cannabis-based medicinal
product (Sativex) in painful diabetic neuropathy: depression is a major
confounding factor. Diabetes Care 2010;33:128-30.
59. Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet 2010;
60. Rajesh M, Mukhopadhyay P, Batkai S et al. Cannabidiol attenuates
high glucose-induced endothelial cell inflammatory response
and barrier disruption. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007;293:
61. El-Remessy AB, Al-Shabrawey M, Khalifa Y et al. Neuroprotective and
blood-retinal barrier-preserving effects of cannabidiol in experimental
diabetes. Am J Pathol 2006;168:235-44.
62. Weiss L, Zeira M, Reich S et al. Cannabidiol lowers incidence of diabetes
in non-obese mice. Autoimmunity 2006;39:143-51.
63. Mahdy RA, Nada WM, Hadhoud KM, El-Tarhony SA. The role of vas-
cular endothelial growth factor in the progression of diabetic vascular
complications. Eye (Lond) 2010 May 28. [Epub ahead of print].
... Previously conducted studies disclosed that CBD administration is related to great therapeutic potential for treatment of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced DM, mostly affecting the oxidative stress, inflammation, and cell death (Jadoon et al., 2016). However, there are some discrepancies in the literature concerning whether or not CBD has a direct effect on blood glucose levels, both, in animal models (Frisher et al., 2010) and in humans (Jadoon et al., 2016;Mattes et al., 2021). These inconsistencies are likely due to the different doses and administration routes of CBD used in distinctive studies. ...
... Cannabis enhances appetite, according to clinical research and survey data [17]. It has been demonstrated that the primary component of cannabis, 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), alters both the action and release of insulin [18]. This may help to explain the use of cannabis for diabetes selfmedication. ...
Full-text available
Background and Objective: The rate of use of cannabis is rapidly increasing in society. Some of its usefulness has been documented, while its effect on weight changes is still understudied. This study was carried out to evaluate the weight changes, physical changes, and histological effects of cannabis on the kidney of Wistar rats. Materials and Methods: They were divided into five groups, A, B, C, D, and E comprising five rats each. The study involved 25 growing Wistar rats with weight ranges between 250-275g and 50 growing Wistar rats for LD50, with weight ranges between 250-275g. Groups A served as the control and received only growers' mash and distilled water, while groups B, C, D, and E received 65mg/kg body weight, 130mg/kg body weight, 162mg/kg body weight, and 194mg/kg body weight of cannabis respectively. Animal weights were measured before and after the administration of cannabis. The control rats and test animals were sacrificed after 28 days, and the kidney was harvested for histological processing. The results obtained were compared with the control using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 20 with a level of significance (P<0.05). Results: The results on weight recorded were; group B (310.0±14.14), groups C (273.0±2.32), D (295.0±7.07), and E (277.0±3.53) recorded significant (P<0.05) lower weight when compared with the control group The control kidney tissue section, however, presented normal cytoarchitectural features of the kidney while the test groups showed histological alterations which were dosage induce. Photomicrograph of group B kidney tissue section shows kidney cytoarchitecture with vacuolations and mild glomerular distortion, photomicrograph of group C kidney tissue section shows kidney cytoarchitecture with vacuolations, photomicrograph of group D kidney tissue section shows shrinking glomeruli which were adjacent to a normal glomerulus and photomicrograph of group E kidney tissue section shows glomerulus surrounded by cellular infiltrates. Conclusion: The study's findings revealed that cannabis has a deleterious effect on the cytoarchitecture of the kidney in a dose-dependent way. Also, more studies are needed to identify the time in relation to dosage consumption effect, knowing which could be harmful to living and the LD 50 that would produce 100% mortality.
... CB1 stimulation also promotes systemic inflammation via NFκB activation, increasing TNF-α and IL-6 expression and augmenting inflammatory cells (polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages), with increased ROS generation, resulting in significant additional production of endocannabinoids; this causes tissue injury and diabetic complications such as retinopathy, cardiomyopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy (Frisher et al., 2010). CB1 activation is involved in cell growth and the differentiation of adipocytes, and in the modulation of adipokine secretion and lipogenesis (Muniyappa et al., 2013). ...
Full-text available
Abstract Metabolic syndrome (MetS), an epidemic defined as a group of interconnected physiological, biochemistry, clinical, and metabolic factors, directly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, and death. MetS therapy includes diet, physical exercise, and a poly-pharmacological intervention. Cannabis is mainly recognized for its recreational uses and has several medical applications for neurological diseases, due to its hypnotic, anxiolytic, antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and anticonvulsant activities. Although several clinical observations in Cannabis smokers suggest metabolic effects, its utility in metabolic disorders is unclear. This review aims to determine under what conditions Cannabis might be useful in the treatment of MetS. Cannabis contains 120 phytocannabinoids, of which Δ9-THC mediates its psychoactive effects. Cannabinoids exert biological effects through interactions with the endocannabinoid system, which modulates several physiologic and metabolic pathways through cannabinoid receptors (CB1/CB2). Signaling through both receptors inhibits neurotransmitter release. In general, endocannabinoid system stimulation in Cannabis smokers and Δ9-THC signaling through CB1 have been implicated in MetS development, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. In contrast, CB1 antagonists and non-psychotropic phytocannabinoids like cannabidiol reduce these effects through interactions with both cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid receptors. These pharmacological approaches represent a source of new therapeutic agents for MetS. However, more studies are necessary to support the therapeutic potential of Cannabis and cannabinoids in metabolic abnormalities.
... Hence, as evidenced in previous studies, the CB2 receptor agonist once again proved to reduce oxidative stress. 26 In ovarian I/R injury, all or part of the blood circulation may be temporarily blocked in surgical interventions, especially caesarean section, or in traumatic events. 27 Although ovarian damage has occurred during ischemia, it has been shown in previous studies that the main damage takes place during reperfusion. ...
PurposeCannabis use has reportedly increased in type 2 diabetic users as a possible co-treatment for associated pain and inflammation. Both cannabis and metformin (an anti-diabetic drug) have a limited number of studies completed on their effect on male reproductive parameters in a diabetic model. This study determined if cannabis and metformin administration alter various reproductive parameters in diabetic male rats.Methods Male Wistar rats (n = 35) were fed on a high fat diet and injected with streptozotocin (30 mg/kg rat) to induce a type-2 diabetic model. Treatment groups received cannabis based on Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations of 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg per rat and metformin (50 mg/kg) every alternate day for 10 weeks. Organ weight; serum testosterone levels and sperm count, motility, lipid peroxidation, citrate synthase and lactate dehydrogenase activities were measured.ResultsCannabis treatment induced a significant concentration dependent decrease in sperm motility at 5 mg/kg rat THC (P = 0.009) administration. Metformin significantly (P = 0.035) increased sperm counts and lactate dehydrogenase activity (P = 0.002). Both cannabis and metformin negatively affected testosterone concentrations.Conclusions Cannabis needs to be used cautiously as an alternative treatment in diabetic males based on the negative effects observed for the various reproductive parameters in this diabetic rat model.
There is a long history of informal use of Cannabis sativa (commonly called cannabis) for many purposes, including treating various ailments worldwide. However, the legalization of cannabis in multiple countries, specifically for medical purposes, has grabbed the researchers' attention to discover the scientific evidence of cannabis’s beneficial effects. Among over 500 identified compounds (cannabinoids), Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) are two major active cannabinoids derived from cannabis. Cannabinoids exert their effects through cannabinoid receptors (CB1R and CB2R). In the recent past, clinical trials have shown the efficacy of cannabis and cannabinoids for various human ailments such as cancer, neurological disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic pain, and metabolic disorders. The commonly used constituents and derivatives of cannabis include CBD, THC, THCV, dronabinol, nabilone, and nabiximol. The cannabis constituents have also been used in combination with other agents such as megestrol acetate in some clinical trials. The common routes for the administration of cannabis are oral, sublingual, or topical. Cannabis has also been consumed through smoking, inhalation, or with food and tea. As high as 572 patients and as low as nine patients have participated in a single clinical trial. Cannabis is legalized in some countries with restrictions, such as Belize, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, The Czech Republic, Jamaica, Netherlands, South Africa, Spain, and Uruguay. This article provides a compilation of published studies focusing on clinal trials on the therapeutic effects of cannabis. The adverse effects of cannabis and its constituents are also discussed.
Abdominal pain and vomiting are common presentations to the emergency medical ward. Management of recurrent abdominal pain and vomiting can be difficult, especially in patients who have diabetes. People with diabetes can present with vomiting and abdominal pain that can cause a diagnostic dilemma. Are the symptoms due to an acute or chronic complication of their diabetes or to other causes? In patients with diabetes who also use cannabis, further diagnostic challenges can arise as recurrent vomiting and abdominal pain due to diabetic gastroparesis and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) can present in similar ways. We present a case series of four patients with type 1 diabetes who had multiple admissions with abdominal pain and vomiting mimicking diabetic gastroparesis, all of whom were eventually diagnosed with CHS. Copyright
Full-text available
Geçmişte pek çok bitki, bitki parçası, meyvesi, tohumu ve bunlardan hazırlanan ürünler (iksirler ve karışımlar) tedavi amaçlı olarak kullanılmıştır. Bugün farmasötik sanayide gelinen aşamadan dolayı geçmişe bakıldığında, kullanılan birçok iksirlerin ve karışımların işe yaramadığı, hatta bazılarının zararlı bile olduğu bilinmektedir. Bununla birlikte, bazı bitkilerin bazı hastalıklara farklı mekanizmalarla olumlu etkileri olabildiği bilimsel olarak kanıtlanırken aynı zamanda bir kısmı ilaç etken maddesi olarak eczanelerde de yer alabilmektedir. Bu bitkilerden biri olan kenevir, insanlar tarafından yüzyıllar boyunca tekstil lifi, ilaç, keyif verici madde, tıbbı tedavi amaçlı olarak ve dini ritüellerde günlük adanma işlemleri sırasında kullanılmıştır.
Aims To explore the association of marijuana use with mean plasma fasting insulin levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score in obese adults with different HOMA-IR. Methods The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a survey research program designed to assess the health and nutrition status of individuals in the United States and to track changes over time. We abstracted data from NHANES 2009–2016. We estimated the minimal lifetime marijuana use (MLU) using the duration of regular exposure and the frequency of use. We assessed the association of MLU and both plasma fasting insulin and HOMA-IR score using log-linear regression models. Results A total of 65,209 obese individuals aged 18 to 59 years were included. In obese individuals who never used marijuana (reference), the mean value (± standard deviation) was 19.0 (± 12.8) μU/mL for plasma fasting insulin and 4.78 (± 3.49) for HOMA-IR. In individuals with HOMA-IR < 2.13 or ≥ 5.72, we found no association of marijuana use with HOMA-IR. In those with HOMA-IR < 5.72, the highest tertile of MLU (i.e., ≥ 1799 times) was associated with 12% decrease (95% confidence intervals, 4–19%) in the fasting insulin and 10% decrease in HOMA-IR (95% CI 1–19%), as compared with their counterparts who never used marijuana. In those with HOMA-IR ≥ 2.13, we found a marked impact of marijuana use only in adults who used marijuana ≥ 1799 times, with 13% decrease (95% CI 5–19%) in fasting insulin and 10% decrease (95% CI 3–18%) in HOMA-IR score. Conclusions Marijuana use is associated with reduced fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR score in US obese adults with HOMA-IR ≥ 2.13, but not in those with HOMA-IR < 2.13 or ≥ 5.72. The impact of marijuana use is the greatest after long-term exposure and is independent of BMI.
Aims:Millions of people consume psychoactives such as marijuana. Mesenchyme cells, which are derived from bone marrow stem cells, have multiple applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of marijuana on differentiation power of bone marrow stem cells of adult male rats in adipose tissues. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, the bone marrow stem cells of adult male rats were segregated with flushing method. Then, their mesenchymal identity was confirmed with a morphological study, PCR-RT method, and surface markers of CD45 and CD34 along with the related genes of CD90 and CD73. For analyzing the viability and differentiation power of the cells in adipose tissues in terms of marijuana usage, cell samples were exposed to different dosages of marijuana, such as 30 and 6000 ng/ml and cell survival was evaluated by MTT. The adipogenic differentiation potential of the treated cells were analyzed based on oil red staining. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Schaffe tests. Findings:The results indicated that the extracted cells are non-adherent in flasks and, in moving from passage one to the next passage, their duplication speed increased. In passage three, they changed into fusiform cells. Based on RT-PCR, it was revealed that CD90 and CD73 were existent, but CD34 and CD45 are nonexistent. Marijuana treatment caused no change in the form of stem cells. 10days after exposure to adipogenic circumstances, in addition to increase of survival, their cytoplasm was repleted with adipose. Conclusion:The results of this study revealed that marijuana has positive effects on mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells in differentiating the adipocyte.
Full-text available
The success of this project was only possible due to the enthusiasm and commitment of a large number of people. Thanks are due to David Potter, GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for providing photographs and useful discussions; Simon
Full-text available
This study was planned to study the relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as an angiogenic factor and different micro- and macrovascular complications in type II diabetic patients and look for a possible role of control on the serum level of VEGF. The study included 55 type II diabetic patients, 10 of them were not complicated with any of the vascular complications of type II diabetes mellitus (DM) (group 1), 21 patients had microvascular complication either retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy (group 2), 14 patients had macrovascular complications either coronary artery disease or peripheral vascular disease (group 3), and 10 patients with mixed micro- and microvascular complications (group 4), as well as 15 healthy subjects served as control group. All subjects were subjected to complete clinical examination, including fundus examination, proper investigations with stress on electrocardiography, electromyography, nerve conduction velocity, Doppler study of the peripheral arteries, and laboratory investigations such as complete blood count, liver function test, serum creatinine, 24-h urinary albumin excretion, lipid profile, fasting and 2-h postprandial blood glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), and serum VEGF. The study revealed that there was a highly significant increase in the serum VEGF in the diabetic patients compared with the control group. The P-value (P<0.001) was detected and there was also a highly significant increase in the serum VEGF in the patients with different micro- and macrovascular diabetic complications compared with uncomplicated diabetic group (P<0.001). A highly significant increase in the serum VEGF in diabetic patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy was detected compared with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (40.55±8.28 vs20.3±2.45, P<0.001) and in diabetic nephropathic patients with macroalbuminuria compared with those with microalbuminuria (36.14±6.99 vs19.42±2.44, P<0.001). The reduction of the serum VEGF in a group of diabetic patients with poor control when their diabetic state was corrected through 4 months follow-up was highly significant (17.29±1.61 before vs9.39±0.82 after control P<0.001), as well as the reduction of the serum VEGF, which was observed in a group of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) when proper pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) was applied to their retinae with 4 months follow-up (40.55±8.28 before vs21.15±1.76 after PRP, P<0.001). On the other hand, the impact of some clinical and laboratory parameters of our diabetic patients on the serum VEGF revealed significant positive correlations between serum VEGF and age of the patients, duration of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, fasting and 2-h postprandial blood glucose, HbA(1c), serum creatinine, degree of albuminuria and total cholesterol, LDL, and platelet count. Serum VEGF was significantly increased in diabetic patients especially with micro- and macrovascular complications and the proper control of diabetes reduced the elevation of serum VEGF in uncontrolled diabetic patients, and in patients with PDR with proper PRP, indicating that VEGF is an angiogenic factor that reflects the degree of neovascularization in diabetic complications.
S’il semble établi que le cannabis puisse être la cause d’une psychose aiguë, son rôle est plus controversé dans l’étiologie des psychoses chroniques. En particulier, du fait de l’association fréquente entre usage de cannabis et schizophrénie, la question a été posée d’un lien de causalité entre l’exposition au cannabis comme facteur de risque et le développement d’une psychose. L’objectif de cette revue de la littérature a été d’évaluer le lien de causalité entre l’usage de cannabis et le développement de psychoses ou l’apparition de symptômes psychotiques. Les études sélectionnées étaient des études prospectives examinant la séquence temporelle entre usage de cannabis et apparition d’une psychose ou de symptômes psychotiques. Nous avons obtenu 60 articles référencés dans MedLine. Après lecture des résumés, 17 articles ont été retenus, et après lecture, seuls sept articles ont été gardés pour analyse. Les données de la littérature montrent l’existence d’une association significative entre usage de cannabis et troubles psychotiques, notamment chez les sujets vulnérables. Le fait que tous les critères de causalité soient retrouvés, suggère que le cannabis est un facteur de risque indépendant pour l’apparition d’une psychose ou de symptômes psychotiques. En particulier, l’usage de cannabis pendant l’adolescence pourrait être un des stresseurs environnementaux qui interagissent en synergie avec une prédisposition génétique pour induire un trouble psychotique. Un dépistage précoce de la vulnérabilité à développer une psychose pourrait avoir des effets bénéfiques au niveau de la prévention des risques liés à l’usage de cannabis.
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is currently the leading cause of death worldwide and together with diabetes, poses a serious health threat, particularly in the Indian Asian population. Risk factor management has evolved considerably with the continued emergence of new and thought-provoking evidence. The stream of laboratory- and population-based research findings as well as unresolved controversies may pose dilemmas and conflicting impulses in most clinicians, and even in our more well-informed patients. As results of the most recent clinical trials on glycaemic control for macrovascular risk reduction are woven into concrete clinical practice guidelines, this paper seeks to sort through unwieldy evidence, keeping these findings in perspective, to deliver a clearer message for the context of South Asia and cardio-metabolic risk management.
Diabetic retinopathy is a common and specific microvascular complication of diabetes, and remains the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-aged people. It is identified in a third of people with diabetes and associated with increased risk of life-threatening systemic vascular complications, including stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. Optimum control of blood glucose, blood pressure, and possibly blood lipids remains the foundation for reduction of risk of retinopathy development and progression. Timely laser therapy is effective for preservation of sight in proliferative retinopathy and macular oedema, but its ability to reverse visual loss is poor. Vitrectomy surgery might occasionally be needed for advanced retinopathy. New therapies, such as intraocular injection of steroids and antivascular endothelial growth-factor agents, are less destructive to the retina than are older therapies, and could be useful in patients who respond poorly to conventional therapy. The outlook for future treatment modalities, such as inhibition of other angiogenic factors, regenerative therapy, and topical therapy, is promising.
Marijuana and hashish consist of at least 66 distinctive plant-derived (phyto-) cannabinoid compounds, with tetrahydrocannabinoids proving the most effective phytocannabinoid psychotropically. Despite the known pharmacological effects of phytocannabinoids, their role in controlling the cell survival/death decision in cells of the CNS continues to be unravelled. In this review, we examine the influence of phytocannabinoids on neural cell fate, with particular emphasis on how the time of marijuana exposure (neonatal vs. pubertal vs. adult) might influence the neurotoxic activities of phytocannabinoid compounds. Evidence in the literature indicates that exposure to phytocannabinoids during the prenatal period, in addition to the adolescent period, can alter the temporally ordered sequence of events that occur during neurotransmitter development, in addition to negatively impacting neural cell survival and maturation. Regarding the effect of marijuana consumption on brain composition in adults the evidence is contradictory. Exposure to marijuana during pregnancy might impact negatively on brain structure in the first years of postnatal life. Furthermore, early-onset (before age 17) marijuana use might also have damaging effects on brain composition. The neonatal and immature CNS is more susceptible to phytocannabinoid damage. In the adult CNS the data are conflicting and the continued development of methods to assess whether marijuana consumption results in brain atrophy or morphometric changes will determine if structural changes are occurring.
Several studies suggest that TNF-alpha contributes to the development of insulin resistance (IR). We compared transcriptional profiles of rat H-411E liver cells exposed to insulin in the absence or presence of TNF-alpha. We identified 33 genes whose expression was altered by insulin, and then reversed by TNF-alpha. Twenty-six of these 33 genes created a single network centered around: insulin, TNF-alpha, p38-MAPK, TGFb1; SMAD and STAT1; and enzymes and cytokines involved in apoptosis (CASP3, GADD45B, IL2, TNF-alpha, etc.). We analyzed our data together with other data of gene expression in adipocytes and found a number of processes common to both, for example, cell death and inflammation; intercellular signaling and metabolism; G-Protein, IL-10 and PTEN signaling. Moreover, the two datasets combined generated a single molecular network that further identified PTEN (a phosphatase) as a unique new link between insulin signaling, IR, and apoptosis reflecting the pathophysiology of "metabolic syndrome".