Content uploaded by Peter B Reich
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Peter B Reich on Dec 28, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
346 NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE | VOL 1 | OCTOBER 2011 | www.nature.com/natureclimatechange
news & views
Imagine a tree trunk, tens of metres tall,
lying across the forest oor. Now image
you and two dozen, better three dozen,
friends, liing it by hand. erein lies the
signicance of trees and forests when it
comes to carbon sequestration; trees are
heavy, and carbon accounts for almost half
their dry weight. Forests are an important
net carbon sink globally: each year they
remove more carbon from the atmosphere
by photosynthesis than they return via
all processes, including respiration and
deforestation. e exact magnitude of this
global forest carbon sink is dicult to gauge,
but is thought to lie between 2.0and 3.4Pg
of carbon per year for intact forests. Now,
writing in Science, Pan and colleagues1
use forest inventory data to estimate the
magnitude of the forest carbon sink over
the past two decades, in what is probably
the most up-to-date and thorough study of
itskind.
e forest carbon sink has been
estimated using several approaches, each
with its own strengths and weaknesses.
Global vegetation models have been used to
determine the size of the land carbon sink,
as have mass balance methods, which rely
on estimates of oceanic and atmospheric
sinks, and inverse modelling techniques,
which rely on measurements of the
concentration and geospatial distribution of
carbon dioxide2,3.
Pan and colleagues1 use yet another
approach to assess forest carbon stocks and
uxes across the globe between 1990and
2007; one that is reliant on forest-inventory
and land-cover data, ancillary data and
estimates. e simplicity of the approach
undoubtedly belies the Herculean eort
involved: they assessed the carbon content of
live biomass, dead wood, litter, soil organic
matter and harvested wood products in
tropical, temperate and boreal forests, and
examined how these stocks changed over
time. According to their analysis, intact
forests and those re-growing following
disturbance sequestered around 4Pg C yr−1
over the measurement period — equivalent
to around 60% of emissions from fossil fuel
burning and cement production combined.
is gross sequestration number sounds
more favourable than it is though, as
tropical deforestation resulted in the release
of almost 3Pg C yr−1. us, globally, the
net forest carbon sink (counting all gains
and losses, including from deforestation)
amounted to just 1.1Pg C yr−1, or one
seventh of emissions from fossil fuel and
cement production (Fig.1), in line with
previous estimates. Furthermore, the net
forest carbon sink from forests remaining
intact — a number given emphasis in
previous scientic assessments — was
2.4PgC yr−1, in the middle of the range of
previous estimates1,2.
e contribution of tropical, temperate
and boreal biomes to the forest carbon sink
was also explored. In the tropics, re-growth
of cleared and logged forests, and continued
growth of intact tropical forests, generated a
colossal carbon sink of 2.83Pg C yr−1, which
largely, but not entirely, counterbalanced
emissions associated with deforestation. As a
result, the tropics served as a relatively small
net source of carbon to the atmosphere
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
Taking stock of forest carbon
Forests take up and store large quantities of carbon. An analysis of inventory data from across the globe suggests
that temperate and boreal forests accounted for the majority of the terrestrial carbon sink over the past
two decades.
Peter B. Reich
4
2
0
–2
–4
–6
–8
Pg C yr–1
Anthropogenic
emissions
Temperate
forests
Boreal
forests
Tropical
source
Tropical
sink
Tropical
forests
Carbon sink/source
Figure 1 | The global forest carbon sink. Pan and colleagues1 used forest inventory data to show that
temperate and boreal forests comprised 100% of the net forest carbon sink between 1990and 2007.
Despite the gross sequestration of large quantities of carbon, tropical forests served as a small net source
of carbon to the atmosphere (dark green bar), due to the even larger losses of carbon dioxide associated
with deforestation. The error bars represent estimated uncertainties based on a combination of
quantitative methods and expert opinion. The uncertainty associated with the net tropical carbon balance
is not known. Anthropogenic emissions and forest carbon data, and uncertainty, taken from ref.1. Image
credits (from left): 1,2, © iStockphoto.com/bronswerk/raciro; 3,4, © Getty Images.
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE | VOL 1 | OCTOBER 2011 | www.nature.com/natureclimatechange 347
news & views
over the measurement period (Fig.1). In
contrast, temperate and boreal forests —
which together accounted for much less
than half of the global gross forest carbon
uptake— were responsible for the entire net
forest carbon sink (Fig.1).
e magnitude of the carbon sinks
and sources in the tropics suggests that
tropical forests are key to future carbon
cycling. Pan and co-workers suggest that,
if managed appropriately, tropical forests
could serve as a large net sink of carbon in
the future and make the United Nation’s
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and
Forest Degradation (REDD) programme
a meaningful contributor to osetting
emissions. Conversely, if deforestation were
to continue unabated, and disturbance
from land-use, drought, re and climate
were to grow this century, as seems likely,
then tropical forests could become a large
net source of carbon to the atmosphere,
with serious consequences for the global
climatesystem.
Of course, the uncertainties associated
with their estimates of carbon-sink size
are signicant. In attempting to estimate
global pools of carbon in forests in all forms,
numerous assumptions were used. Even
in countries with the most sophisticated
forest inventories — largely developed
nations in Europe and North America —
insucient coverage of all forest sectors,
together with errors in accounting, mean
that large uncertainties are evident at the
national scale. As a result, the magnitude of
the uncertainty associated with the global
carbon sink is large and nearly matches that
of the sink itself.
More important than these uncertainties,
perhaps, is the question of whether the
current sink strength of the world’s forests
will persist over the next 25to 50years.
ere are many reasons why it might not,
including warming-induced emissions from
boreal forests, heightened deforestation
in the tropics, and a reduction in the
fertilization eect of increased levels of
carbon dioxide, as other resources, such as
nutrients and water, become proportionally
more limiting4–7.
Furthermore, forests inuence climate
in numerous other ways, aside from
carbon cycling. Forests emit greenhouse
gases other than carbon dioxide, such as
nitrous oxide and methane8, and oen
reduce the reectivity of the Earth’s surface
by absorbing solar radiation9. Although
both of these processes act to increase
radiative forcing, their impact on future
climate will depend on variables such as
land use, forest management and human
disturbance. For example, shis in land
management that alter the extent and
timing of soil waterlogging may inuence
trace-gas emissions, and shis in forest
management towards species that dier in
spectral qualities could inuence albedo9,10.
Although dicult to quantify on a global
stage, these additional emissions and
biogeophysical eects need to be considered
when assessing the role of forests in the
climate system.
e ndings of Pan and colleagues1
demonstrate the ongoing importance of
forests as a key carbon sink. Unfortunately,
however, they do not provide a road map
to the future. Whether the carbon-sink
strength of the world’s forests will shi
this century, and whether emissions of
greenhouse gases (other than carbon
dioxide) and shis in surface reectivity will
act to dampen or amplifyanthropogenic
warming, remains to be seen. ❐
Peter B. Reich is at the Department of Forest
Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul,
Minnesota 55108, USA, and the Hawkesbury
Institute for the Environment, University of Sydney,
News South Wales, Australia.
e-mail: preich@umn.edu
References
1. Pan, Y. etal. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).
2. Le Quere, C., Raupach, M.R., Canadell, J.G., Marland, G. et al.
Nature Geosci. 2, 831–836 (2009).
3. Nassar, R. etal. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 6029–6047 (2011).
4. Lewis, S.L., Lloyd, J., Sitch, S., Mitchard, E.T.A & Laurance, W.F.
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 40, 529–549 (2009).
5. Zhao, M. & Running, S.W. Science 329, 940–943 (2010).
6. Kurz, W.A., Stinson, G., Rampley, G.J., Dymond, C.C. &
Neilson, E.T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci .USA 105, 1551–1555 (2008).
7. Reich, P.B., Hungate, B.A. & Luo, Y. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
37, 611–636 (2006).
8. Van Groenigen, K.J., Osenberg, C.W. & Hungate, B.A. Nature
475, 214–216 (2011).
9. Betts, R.A. Nature 408, 187–190 (2000).
10. Ollinger, S.V. etal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci .USA
105, 19336–19341 (2008).
It is no longer news that China, with its
unprecedented economic development,
has become one of the world’s biggest
energy consumers and, therefore, one of
the world’s largest carbon dioxide emitters.
e international debate around the
magnitude and trend of China’s carbon
footprint has spurred research on the issue
and encouraged the Chinese government to
take on measures to address climate change.
Fair and eective national abatement eorts
should reect the dierences in regional
contributions to China’s carbon dioxide
emission levels. However, little is known
about the dierent regional emission paths
behind China’s carbon footprint. Chinese
regions show very diverse economic
conditions, with highly developed areas
relying on state-of-the-art technologies and
others still under-developed depending on
old infrastructure and technologies. e
level and trend of their carbon emissions
vary substantially, but the dierences are
not captured in an aggregate indicator such
as the national carbon footprint. Writing
in Energy Policy, Meng and colleagues1
highlight the great disparities in regional
emission patterns in China and show
how these dierences are important for
climatepolicy.
anks to remarkable economic growth
over the past three decades, China’s
domestic living standards have been
greatly enhanced, and between 1981and
2005 about 600million people2 were
lied out of poverty. Nevertheless, China’s
economic wonder has come at a high
price. Owing to the huge consumption
of fossil fuels, especially coal, to meet its
increasing demand for energy, China’s
natural environment has deteriorated
rapidly. Increased levels of air and water
pollution endanger people’s health, and
extreme weather events have increased in
scale and frequency presenting a growing
threat to the population. e Chinese
government has realized the need to tackle
these environmental problems and, in
POLICY
China’s regional emissions
The reduction of carbon dioxide emissions is a pressing challenge for China. Now research demonstrates that China’s
local energy-related emission patterns are important for setting eective greenhouse-gas abatement policies.
Yongfu Huang and Jingjing He
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved