Article

An alternate derivation of relativistic momentum

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

An alternate derivation of the expression for relativistic momentum is given which does not rely on the symmetric glancing collision first introduced by Lewis and Tolman in 1909 and used by most authors today. The collision in the alternate derivation involves a non-head-on elastic collision of one body with an identical one initially at rest, in which the two bodies after the collision move symmetrically with respect to the initial axis of the collision. Newtonian momentum is found not to be conserved in this collision and the expression for relativistic momentum emerges when momentum conservation is imposed. In addition, kinetic energy conservation can be verified in the collision. Alternatively, the collision can be used to derive the expression for relativistic kinetic energy without resorting to a work-energy calculation. Some consequences of a totally inelastic collision between these two bodies are also explored.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Alternative treatments of relativistic dynamics, in which the conservation of fourmomentum is deduced, have been proposed in the literature [4][5][6][7]. Among these, the treatments presented in [6] and [7] deserve special attention, on account of their simplicity. ...
... Alternative treatments of relativistic dynamics, in which the conservation of fourmomentum is deduced, have been proposed in the literature [4][5][6][7]. Among these, the treatments presented in [6] and [7] deserve special attention, on account of their simplicity. A careful examination reveals that the following assumptions are used in these references. ...
... Since the conservation of the sum of four-momenta deduced here from the laws of classical dynamics does not apply to relativistic collisions, a final corollary is introduced, which proves the following statement: if the sum of the four-momenta for a set of particles has the same value at instants t 1 and t 2 with respect to a reference frame O, then it has the same value, at the corresponding time instants t 1 and t 2 , with respect to any other inertial reference frame O . This corollary is a generalization of the examples, on the conservation of four-momentum in collisions, discussed in [6] and [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A rigorous definition of mass in special relativity, proposed in a recent paper, is recalled and employed to obtain simple and rigorous deductions of the expressions of momentum and kinetic energy for a relativistic particle. The whole logical framework appears as the natural extension of the classical one. Only the first, second and third laws of non-relativistic classical dynamics are postulated, in an axiomatic form which does not employ the concept of force. The axiomatic statements of the second and third laws of relativistic dynamics, which yield the relativistic definitions of mass and four-momentum and the conservation of four-momentum for an isolated pair of relativistic particles with a small relative velocity, are proved as simple consequences of the classical ones and of the Lorentz transformation of coordinates. Then, relativistic four-force and three-force are defined, and the expression of relativistic kinetic energy is deduced. Finally, a simple proof of the Lorentz invariance of the conservation of the sum of four-momenta for any set of particles, with arbitrary relative velocities, is presented.
... Eq. (15) suggests considering that the magnitude of the momentum transforms as ...
... An electromagnetic wave carries energy E (heats a body it hits) and momentum p (exerts pressure on the body it hits). 15 Equation (32) ...
Article
The fundamental equations of relativistic dynamics are derived from a thought experiment and from the transformation of relativistic velocity avoiding collisions and conservation laws of momentum and energy.
... It can be derived by applying the formulae of special-relativistic mechanics to e.g. simple collisions (Peters 1986, Rohrlich 1990. As a first step, one finds that an increase ∆E in energy for an object, or system, will necessarily result in an equivalent increase ∆m in the inertial mass, that is, in the mass factor that determines how strongly an object will react to an external force by accelerating. ...
Article
An introduction to the physics and mathematics of the expanding universe, using no more than high-school level / undergraduate mathematics. Covered are the basics of scale factor expansion, the dynamics of the expanding universe, various distance concepts and the generalized redshift-luminosity relation, among other topics.
... Some works were carried out on basics and/or kinematics [2 -6], but dynamics seems to have been much neglected, in particular those subjects directly involved in deducing and making meaning of mass-energy equivalence. Exceptions are Relativistic Concept Inventory [7] and attempts to deduce momentum [8] and energy [9]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
In relativistic dynamics, force and acceleration are no longer parallel. In this article, we revisit the relativistic motion of a particle under the action of a constant force, f\boldsymbol{f}. \ For a two-dimensional motion, the final velocity in each axis is (fi/f)c,(f_{i}/f)c, independently of the initial velocities, yielding an asymptotic velocity always parallel to the force. The particular case in which the force is applied in a single axis is analyzed in detail, with the behavior of velocity and acceleration being exhibited for several configurations. Some previous results of the literature concerning velocity and acceleration behavior are improved and better explored. Differently from which was previously claimed, it is shown that a negative acceleration component can exist in the direction of the biggest force component and that acceleration does not decrease monotonically to zero.
Article
Relativity requires that a particle's momentum and energy are the same functions of the particle's velocity in all inertial frames. Using the fact that momentum and energy must transform linearly between reference frames, we present a novel derivation of the mass-energy equivalence, namely, the relation that the energy is proportional to the moving mass, with no postulate about the existence of light or its properties. We further prove the mass-velocity relation without relying on momentum and energy conservation or on the Lorentz transformation. It is demonstrated that neither conservation laws nor the Lorentz transformation are necessary to establish those relations, and that those relations have a wider scope of validity than that of the conservation laws and the invariance of the speed of light.
Article
We obtain the expressions for the energy and momentum of a relativistic particle by incorporating the equivalence of mass and energy into Newtonian mechanics.
Article
It is shown that the correct expressions for momentum and kinetic energy of a particle moving at high speed were already implicit in physics going back to Maxwell. The demonstration begins with a thought experiment of Einstein by which he derived the inertial equivalence of energy, independently of the relativity postulates. A simple modification of the same experiment does the rest.
Article
This paper explores the evolution of Einstein's understanding of mass and energy. Early on, Einstein embraced the idea of a speed-dependent mass but changed his mind in 1906 and thereafter carefully avoided that notion entirely. He shunned, and explicitly rejected, what later came to be known as ``relativistic mass.'' Nonetheless many textbooks and articles credit him with the relation E=mc2, where E is the total energy, m is the relativistic mass, and c is the vacuum speed of light. Einstein never derived this relation, at least not with that understanding of the meaning of its terms. He consistently related the ``rest energy'' of a system to its invariant inertial mass.
Article
Full-text available
Based on relativistic velocity addition and the conservation of momentum and energy, I present simple derivations of the expressions for the relativistic momentum and kinetic energy of a particle, and for the formula E = mc2.
Article
The special relativistic expressions for momentum and energy are obtained by requiring their conservation in a totally inelastic variant of the Lewis-Tolman symmetric collision. The resulting analysis is simpler and more straightforward than the usual textbook treatments of relativistic dynamics.
Article
A purely mechanical version is given of Einstein’s 1905 argument that the mass of a body depends on its energy content. The Gedankenexperiment described here is the same as Einstein’s, except that the body loses energy not through electromagnetic radiation, but through the emission of massive particles. The concept of mass is not assumed, but is extracted as one of two constants of integration. Viewing mass in this way emphasizes a sometimes obscured distinction between mass as a proportionality constant in the kinetic energy (for which E=mc2 has profound physical content), and mass as it appears in the conventional relativistic rest energy (for which E=mc2 is merely a convenient convention).
Article
Full-text available
The equivalence of mass m and rest-energy E0 is one of the great discoveries of all time. Despite the current wisdom, Einstein did not derive this relation from first principles. Having conceived the idea in the summer of 1905 he spent more than 40 years trying to prove it. We briefly examine all of Einstein's conceptual demonstrations of E0=mc2, focusing on their limitations and his awareness of their shortcomings. Although he repeatedly confirmed the efficacy of E0=mc2, he never constructed a general proof. Leaving aside that it continues to be affirmed experimentally, a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory.
Article
In several recent papers we showed that choosing new sets of postulates, including classical (pre-Einstein) physics laws, within the main body of Einstein's special relativity theory (SRT) and applying the relativity principle, enables us to cancel the Lorentz transformation from the main body of SRT. In the present paper, and by following the same approach, we derive Einstein's equation E = mc 2 from classical physical laws such as the Lorentz force law and Newton's second law. Einstein's equation is obtained without the usual approaches of thought experiment, conservation laws, considering In this paper we also identify a fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is interpreting the formula E = mc 2 as the equivalence between inertial mass and any type of energy and in all contexts. It is shown in several recent papers that this is incorrect, that this is a misinterpretation. What Einstein considered to be a central consequence of special relativity is in fact derivable from (pre-Einstein) classical considerations. E = mc 2 becomes secondary, not fundamental, and whilst no doubt useful in certain circumstances, need not be valid in all generality.
Article
It is shown mathematically that there are two distinct ways of generalizing the concept of mass in Newtonian mechanics to Einstein's theory of relativity. We discuss the logical structure of the theory in terms of this.
Article
We show that knowing the addition law of parallel velocities, which can be derived directly from the first postulate, we are able to derive the Lorentz transformations for the space and time coordinates, for mass and momentum, for the frequency and wave vector as well as for the normal components of the electric and magnetic fields. Zusammenfassung. Man zeigt, dass durch dass Kennen des Gesetzes der Zusammensetzung der parallelen Geschwindigkeiten, welches direkt aus dem ersten Postulat hervorgeht, die Lorentz Transformation f?r Raum und Zeit Koordinaten, die Masse und Impuls, Frequenz und Wellenzahl sowie die normalen Komponenten des elektrischen und magnetischen Feldes bestimmt werden k?nnen.
Article
We show that relativistic dynamics can be approached without using conservation laws (conservation of momentum, of energy and of the centre of mass). Our approach avoids collisions that are not easy to teach without mnemonic aids. The derivations are based on the principle of relativity and on its direct consequence, the addition law of relativistic velocities.
Article
Full-text available
It is shown that if we can define a physical quantity with proper character in a given inertial reference frame (kinematic, dynamic, electromagnetic in its nature) which transforms when detected from a reference frame relative to which it moves with velocity uxu_x as F=\f{F^o}{\sqrt{1-\f{u_x^2}{c^2}}} then we can derive for it transformation equations following one and the same procedure, which involves the addition law of relativistic velocities which can be derived without using the Lorentz transformations. The transformation equation derived that way, generates the physical quantities uxFu_xF and uxFu_x'F', for which physicists invent names reflecting theirs physical meaning.