Content uploaded by Angela Clow
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Angela Clow on Nov 10, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
© Journal of holistic healthcare
●
Volume 3 Issue 2 May 2006
29
Normalisation of salivary cortisol
levels and self-report stress by a
brief lunchtime visit to an art
gallery by London City workers
Angela Clow PhD
with
Cathrine Fredhoi MSc
Department of Psychology, University of
Westminster
As a psychophysiologist I investigate the way emotion (typically negative mood states
or stress) affects bodily functions and, in the long run, health. Recently people have
questioned whether the health benefits associated with a positive outlook and good
social support are merely a buffer for these negative effects or whether they have
direct and independent pathways to health. My research has involved development of
methodologically sound ways to explore these sorts of questions by measurement of
free cortisol concentrations in saliva.
Introduction
Measurement of the steroid stress
hormone cortisol is increasingly
employed as an objective biomarker
of stress.
1
Cortisol has a diverse set
of actions ranging from effects on
blood pressure, stored reserves of
energy and the balance of the
immune system. It regulates these
systems in normal (non-stressful)
day-to-day living as well in response
to a stressor: stress causes additional
bursts of cortisol secretion. Healthy
cortisol secretion shows a marked
circadian cycle with highest levels in
the morning falling to lower levels in
the evening and during the early
phases of sleep. This changing
circadian pattern is vital for informing
other body systems when it is night
and day so that they can operate to
maximum efficiency. Stressful living
conditions can disturb this healthy
pattern resulting in inappropriately
high cortisol concentrations for the
time of day. Disturbed cortisol
circadian profiles have been linked
to ageing,
2
clinical depression
3
and
a range of stress-related physical
disease (eg Sephton et al
4
).
Summary
• We studied the impact of a brief lunchtime visit to an art
gallery on City workers’ levels of the stress hormone cortisol
as well as self-report levels of stress and arousal.
• Average levels of cortisol and self-report stress were
significantly reduced by the visit, levels of arousal were
unchanged.
• On arrival at the gallery levels of cortisol were elevated
relative to expected values. Following the gallery visit the
cortisol concentrations had normalised to those expected for
the time of day.
• The observed drop in cortisol was rapid and substantial;
under normal circumstances it would take about 5 hours of
normal diurnal decline for cortisol levels to fall to this extent.
• We conclude that the gallery visit caused rapid normalisation
(recovery) from the consequences of high stress.
RESEARCH
© Journal of holistic healthcare
●
Volume 3 Issue 2 May 2006
30
It takes about 15 minutes for a stressor to illicit
increased cortisol secretion, the time course of which
can be accurately tracked by measuring the hormone in
sequential saliva samples.
5
There has been extensive
research into such stress-induced cortisol responding.
6
There has been less research exploring the impact of
positive experiences within a naturalistic setting on
cortisol levels although it has been shown that the size
of the cortisol response to a standard stressor can be
attenuated by cognitive behavioural therapy.
7, 8
Very little research has been carried out into effects
of naturalistic, non-therapeutic interventions such as are
presented in this article. The current study set out to
explore self-reported stress and arousal as well as salivary
cortisol levels of a group of London City workers during
a lunch hour, before and after a visit to The Guildhall
Art Gallery.
Procedures
Email invitations were sent out to office workers in
the vicinity of the Guildhall Art Gallery in the City of
London. The invitation included free gallery entrance,
participation is a study on stress as well as a free sandwich
lunch at the end of the study. On a typical working day
small groups of volunteers arrived at the gallery at
pre-arranged 15 minute intervals during their lunch
break (between 12.30 1.30pm). On arrival at the gallery
each group was directed to a quiet meeting room and
welcomed by our researcher. Having given informed
consent participants were asked to complete a short
questionnaire (the Cox Mackay Stress Arousal
Checklist).
9
This questionnaire assessed their state of
stress and arousal upon arrival at the gallery. At the
same time they were asked to supply a saliva sample
using the convenient Salivette saliva sampling device.
This process was repeated 35–40 minutes later, after
they had completed a visit to the gallery exhibition area.
Participants were free to explore the gallery in any way
they pleased; the only requirement was that they did not
leave the building and that they return to the meeting
room 35 minutes later. In this way we could study the
psychological and physiological impact of the short
gallery visit. Saliva samples were used to determine
levels of cortisol. Samples were thawed and cortisol
concentrations were determined by Enzyme Linked
Immuno-Sorbent Assay developed by Salimetrics LLC
(USA). (For details of assay procedures see
10
).
Participants
28 participants agreed to take part in the study, 14 males
and 14 females. Mean age was 33.6 years (range 22–58).
However three participants failed to provide complete
data sets and the following results are presented for 25
of the original 28 participants.
Results
There was a fall in self-reported stress after the gallery
visit compared with immediately before the visit. This
difference was statistically significant using paired t-tests
(mean ± SEM scores pre and post: 5.28 ± 0.94 and
2.89 ± 0.57 respectively, t=3.643, df=24, p<0.001).
There was no difference in level of arousal pre vs. post
the gallery visit (mean ± SEM scores pre and post:
8.60 ± 0.68 and 9.40 ± 0.72 respectively) (See Figure 1).
There was a corresponding drop in the average levels of
cortisol after the 35 minute gallery visit (mean ± SEM
cortisol concentrations pre and post: 5.82 ± 0.76 nmol/l
and 3.94 ± 0.25 nmol/l respectively, t=2.913, df=24,
p<0.008), see Figure 2.
Figure 3 shows that when the participants entered
the gallery their cortisol levels were higher than would
have been expected or predicted from our previous
Normalisation of salivary cortisol levels and self-report stress by a brief lunchtime visit to an art gallery by London City workers
RESEARCH
FIGURE 1 Levels of self-report stress and arousal before and after
the visit to the gallery (mean scores ± SEM, N=25)
FIGURE 2 Cortisol concentrations (nmol/l) before and after the
visit to the gallery (mean concentrations ± SEM, N=25)
Score
15
10
5
0
Pre Post
*
Before and after the 35 minute visit
Stress
Arousal
p<0.001
*
Cortisol concentration (nmol/l)
7.5
5.0
2.5
0.0
Before visit After visit
*
p<0.001
*
© Journal of holistic healthcare
●
Volume 3 Issue 2 May 2006
31
research on participants of similar age and without
excessive stress in their lives. We can conclude that, on
average, at arrival the participants showed evidence of
relatively high levels of stress. However within the space
of 35 minutes average levels had dropped to below the
normal range. This fall in cortisol concentration (1.87
nmol) is greater than the average fall in concentration
from 10am to 3pm ie in five hours (1.68 nmol/l). In other
words, the visit induced a fall in cortisol concentration
equivalent to that which takes about five hours under
normal circumstances (the normal, healthy pattern of
cortisol secretion is for a gradual decline in
concentrations over the day.
11
There was a tendency for the male participants to
have higher levels of cortisol on arrival at the gallery,
although this did not reach statistical significance (mean
± SEM concentrations: 7.44 ± 1.31nmol/l and 4.54 ±
0.78 nmol/l for males and females respectively, t=2.001,
df=23, p= 0.057). However males did have significantly
higher cortisol levels after the end of the gallery visit
(mean ± SEM concentrations: 4.58 ± 0.38 nmol/l and
3.54 ± 0.29 nmo/l respectively, t=2.224, df=22,
p< 0.04), see Figure 4.
Although the males tended to show higher cortisol
levels on arrival at the gallery and were higher at the
end of the visit the results reveal that they were more
responsive than the female participants. When analysed
separately only the male participants showed a decrease
in their salivary cortisol levels (t=2.625, df=10, p<0.03)
whereas the females did not (t=1.492, df=13, p=0.159).
This gender difference in the objective measure of stress
was not reflected in gender differences in self-report
measures of stress.
Post hoc examination of the data revealed that there
were 16 participants who responded to the gallery visit
with a fall in cortisol (‘responders’) and nine who did
not show a reduction (‘non-responders’). Further
analyses showed that the ‘responders’ were those
participants who arrived at the gallery with high levels
of cortisol whereas the non responders arrived with
significantly lower levels of cortisol (mean ± SEM
concentrations: 7.53 ± 0.94 nmol/l and 2.77 ± 0.34 nmol/l
respectively, t=3.697 df=23 p<0.005) (see
Figure 5).
At the end of the gallery visit there was no difference
between the average cortisol concentrations of the two
groups (mean ± SEM concentrations: 4.03 ± 0.33 nmol/l
and 3.80 ± 0.41 nmol/l respectively).
Discussion
This study has demonstrated that a brief lunchtime visit
to an art gallery had substantial influences on both the
subjective experience of stress as well as levels of the
stress hormone cortisol. On arrival at the gallery average
levels of cortisol were higher than normative values but
these dropped rapidly to below the norm for the time of
day. Indeed analyses revealed that cortisol levels only
dropped in those participants who entered the study
with relatively high levels: the gallery visit induced
normalisation to desired cortisol levels for the time of
day. Recent research points to the importance of
Normalisation of salivary cortisol levels and self-report stress by a brief lunchtime visit to an art gallery by London City workers
RESEARCH
FIGURE 3 Cortisol concentrations (nmol/l) before and after the visit
to the gallery shown within the context of normative ‘unstressed’
cortisol concentrations determined from previous research
FIGURE 4 Cortisol concentrations (nmol/l) before and after the visit to the gallery for males and females separately (mean concentrations ± SEM)
Cortisol concentration (nmol/l)
10.0
5.0
2.5
0.0
7.5
Before After
*
Cortisol concentration (nmol/l)
6
5
4
3
Hour of day
10 11 12 13 14 15
Normative values
Study participants
Males
Cortisol concentration (nmol/l)
10.0
5.0
2.5
0.0
7.5
Before After
Females
© Journal of holistic healthcare
●
Volume 3 Issue 2 May 2006
32
maintaining a healthy circadian pattern of cortisol
secretion and this study demonstrates that even brief
respites within a hectic working lifestyle can buffer the
effects of stress. Furthermore it was interesting to
observe marked gender differences in this study.
Although they did not report more stress the males had
higher cortisol levels than the females, but in line with
the normalisation phenomenon, it was the males that
responded more markedly whereas the less
physiologically stressed females did not show a significant
fall in cortisol. It is well known that males are more
responsive to stressful events
12
and it is interesting to
observe in this study that this responsiveness also works
in the direction of reducing cortisol concentrations.
References
1 Clow A. Cortisol as a biomarker of stress. Journal of Holistic
Healthcare 2004; 1 (3): 10–14.
2 Deuschle M, Gotthardt U, Schweiger U, Weber B, Korner A,
Schmider J, Standhardt H, Lammers C–H & Heuser I. With aging in
humans the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal system
increases and its diurnal amplitude flattens.
Life Sci. 1997; 61,
2239–2246.
3 Weber B, Lewicka S, Deuschle M, Colla M, Vecsei P & Heuser I.
Increased diurnal plasma concentrations of cortisone in depressed
patients.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000; 85, 1133–1136.
Normalisation of salivary cortisol levels and self-report stress by a brief lunchtime visit to an art gallery by London City workers
RESEARCH
4 Sephton SE, Sapolsky RM, Kraemer HC & Spiegel D. Diurnal
cortisol rhythm as a predictor of breast cancer survival. J Natl
Cancer Inst 2000; 92, 994–1000.
5 Kirschbaum C & Hellhammer DH. Salivary cortisol in
psychobiological research – an overview.
Neuropsychobiology 1989;
22, 150–169.
6 Pressner JC, Hellhammer DH & Kirschbaum C. Low self-esteem,
induced failure and the adrenocortical response.
Personality and
Individual Diff. 1999; 27, 47–489.
7 Hammerfald K, Eberle M, Grau A, Kinsperger A, Zimmermann U,
Gaab J. Persistent effects of cognitive-behavioural stress management
on cortisol responses to acute stress in healthy subjects – a
randomized controlled trial.
Psychoneuroendocrinology 2006; 31:
333–339.
8 Facchinetti F, Tarabusi M & Volpe A. Cognitive behavioural treatment
decreases cardiovascular and neuroendocrine reactions to stress.
Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004; 29, 162–173.
9 Mackay C, Cox T, Burrows G & Lazzerini T, 1978. An inventory for
the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. B
ritish
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 283–284.
10 Thorn L, Hucklebridge F, Esgate A, Evans P & Clow A. The effect of
dawn simulation on the cortisol response to awakening in healthy
participants.
Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004; 29, 925–930.
11 Edwards S, Clow A, Evans P & Hucklebridge F. Exploration of the
awakening cortisol response in relation to diurnal cortisol secretory
activity.
Life Sci. 2001; 68, 2093–2103.
12 Kudielka BM, Hellhammer J, Hellhammer DH, Wolf OT, Pirke KM,
Varadi E, Pilz J, Kirschbaum C. Sex differences in endocrine and
psychological responses to psychosocial stress in healthy elderly
subjects and the impact of a 2-week dehydroepiandrosterone
treatment.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998; 83(5):1756–61.