ArticlePDF Available

Down-and-dirty Guidelines for Effective Discussions in Online Courses

Down-and-dirty Guidelines for Effective
Discussions in Online Courses
Joanna C. Dunlap
Educators who design and deliver online courses must connect with their learners
as they do in their on-campus courses. They have to provide true opportunities for
inspirational and meaningful learning, rather than a sterile experience of clicking within
a labyrinth of links. In an online course, student engagement occurs in three distinct
ways: Interaction of the student with the instructor, with other students, and with the
content (Moore & Kearsley, 2005). Much of the literature on online interaction is
concerned with social interaction (studenttoinstructor and studenttostudent) because
of the criticality of social context in supporting learning and as a way to minimize
student isolation and increase student motivation and retention (LudwigHardman &
Dunlap, 2003). Without a highlevel of social presence (Anderson, 2004; Aragon, 2003;
Gunawardena & Zittle, 1997), learners can feel isolated and disengaged because of a
lack of communication intimacy and immediacy (Lombard & Ditton, 1997). Therefore,
discussionbased activities are the breadandbutter of many online courses.
Because of the critical role that social context plays in inspirational and meaningful
learning, online courses need to include opportunities for rich and relevant discussion,
supported by solid instructor facilitation and strong group participation. To achieve this
goal, educators need to use strategies that (1) create a sense of learning community in
which learners learn from each other and from the teacher (Palloff & Pratt, 1999; Rovai,
2002), (2) encourage the sharing of multiple perspectives (Bender, 2003), and (3)
promote high quality work through collaboration and peer review (Hurst & Thomas,
2004) – without creating an instructional situation in which everyone is online
constantly (Dunlap, 2005). Unfortunately, accomplishing this level of social presence in
online courses – especially those courses that primarily rely on asynchronous
communication technologies – is challenging, even for experienced educators.
The purpose of the following list of guidelines is to help educators new to online
teaching, design, facilitate, and manage effective discussions for learners in online
courses in order to establish the level of social presence needed to encourage
inspirational and meaningful learning. These guidelines do not work in isolation, but
work systemically together to create an effective online learning experience.
Setting Participation Expectations
1. Inform learners about your online schedule, and make sure they know how often
you expect them to be online.
2. Balance discussion and other activities. Weekly discussions can get tiring, and can
lose power if overused. Give everyone a break from discussions.
3. Have discussion participation count towards the final grade. (See #19 below for a
strategy –Inspiration Points – that can be used to determine a participation score.)
4. If you have a large class, have smaller groups participate in a discussion instead of
the whole group (e.g., if 30 students, have 3 groups of 10).
5. Share guidelines for discussions that help learners understand what it means to
contribute effectively to discussions. For example, here is a “Top 10” that I provide
my students before we start engaging in online discussions:
a. Be direct: Share comments, ideas, and suggestions directly with classmates.
b. Be specific: When praising or commenting on others' contributions, avoid
being vague. Be clear about what aspect (excerpt, portion, etc.) of the
classmate's comment you are responding to. Describe how the classmate's
contribution helped you understand the topic or think about the topic in a
different way.
c. Be nonattributive: Do not describe a classmate's attributes but rather
describe your experience of her or his contribution – the effect that her or his
contribution had on you. Use “I statements” that convey your experience of
the other person’s efforts.
d. Share knowledge and ideas:
Applications and examples from the workplace and community
Great tips and tricks
Unique resources such as useful website, books, blogs, articles,
workshop information and/or technical work groups etc.
Relevant personal and professional experiences
Strategies, tools, and problem solving skills
e. Encourage vision: Present unique, insightful ideas, perspectives and
questions that are thought provoking and promote further discussion.
Encourage new ways of thinking that makes the group see something in a
new way. Disseminate new information and knowledge about the topic being
discussed. Demonstrate your ability to see beyond the obvious.
f. Contribute to group's sense of wellbeing and harmony: Be open to
others' comments and ideas. Make statements that support and honor
differences. Share thoughts and opinions with others without judgment or
prejudice. Make comments that help create a healthy learning environment
and inspire people to want to learn more. Make statements that mediate
differences and find commonality. Make statements that lift classmates'
spirits. When appropriate, share comments that draw the conversation back
to the focus of the discussion topic.
g. Demonstrate knowledge of the topic: Contribute to discussions by making
comments that are insightful and informed (include resources, personal
experiences with a topic, and so on).
h. Actively Participate: Make an extra effort to actively participate throughout
the discussion and engage classmates throughout the duration of the
i. Offer Assistance: Offer assistance to other students and help others who
need extra explanation on a topic.
j. Ask Questions: Pose questions and ask for help when needed.
An alternative to providing learners with a set of guidelines, have learners develop
the “ground rules” for discussion. Have students answer questions like:
What is our definition of a respectful, balanced discussion?
How will we determine in what order people speak?
How do we feel about interrupting?
What should we do if someone dominates the discussion?
What should we do if we don't hear from everyone in the room?
What should we do if we discuss something controversial or uncomfortable?
What should we do if someone says something we don't like?
This activity helps students reflect on their own discussion habits, makes it clear to
everyone what is expected during discussions and empowers students to stick up
for themselves and others when one of the rules is violated (e.g., someone
dominates the discussion or keeps interrupting others). It also gives students a
chance to practice being in a discussion before they have to participate in a
discussion covering a course topic, allowing them to become more comfortable
with their peers and the discussion format.
Setting the Tone for Social Sharing and Community
7. Make sure learners understand the need for civility.
8. Personalize your communications. Send a personal message to each student at the
start of the semester. Use learners’ names in posts.
9. Share a story, related to the content of the course, if possible, that gives learners
insight into your values, passions, interests and so on. Consider using a tool such as
PowerPoint, VoiceThread (, or Jing
( to enhance your story with photos, images, and audio clips
(including your voice) – making it a digital story, in other words. See for an example of a digital story
that helps my students feel more connected to me (and therefore, more willing to
share and participate in course activities, specifically discussion) while introducing
an important topic of my courses – values for teaching and learning. Notice that
students never see me, but hear my voice, see photos of my family and listen to me
describe a lifealtering event that reflects my own values around teaching and
learning. Now that I have shared, the students are more open to sharing.
10. Use an icebreaker. For example, ask learners to post bios/introductions, including a
list of “facts” about themselves – some true and some not true. Have learners guess
which facts are false using a “20 Questions” protocol. Other examples include:
Completing a sentence – “I was driving my car today when I…”
Have students interview and introduce each other
Provide a hook – e.g., ask students to describe the weirdest gift they ever
Play a game – e.g., sinking ship with 20 passengers, the lifeboat can hold
11. Give learners nonthreatening opportunities to practice participating in online
discussions (using the tools, protocols, etiquette, etc.). Consider the following
Post entertaining photos (not related to the course content) and ask learners
to share their captions.
Similarly, send learners to a website that requires they do something and then
ask them to share their experience with the group. For example,
have them visit and respond to the
following questions in a discussion forum:
- What happens to you while you are there?
- What is your favorite part of the experience?
- Why do you think I am asking you to do these sorts of activities?
Have them visit the Mr. Picassohead website – – and create an artwork, then submit a link
to the discussion forum. Once posted, encourage learners to comment on
each other’s artwork.
Launching and Structuring Discussions
12. Tie discussions to course events: projects, readings, preparing for an
assessment/test, etc. And consider alternatives to the questionanswer format such
as roleplays, debates, case studies and games.
13. Use highlevel questions that are thought provoking, hypothetical, controversial,
etc. For example, ask students to complete the sentence (“What most struck me
about the book we are reading is…”). Ask questions that require learners to take a
position, provide a rationale for the position, present evidence to support their
position, and attend to other learners’ contributions.
14. Ask followup questions to stimulate conversation. For example, what reasons did
you have for saying this? Can you please elaborate? How do you define x? What do
you think might be the implications of your previous statement? Are there
alternatives to this approach?
15. Limit the number of topics/questions used to ignite a new discussion to two or
three. Stack the deck in favor of deeper discussions. Post a separate message for
each question.
16. Allow learners to choose which topics/questions they focus on.
17. Use provocative subject lines: “Three reasons why the author is dead wrong,”
“Computers program children,” “All we need to know about teaching we can learn
from skateboarders,” or “Why I love the Raiders.”
18. Don’t jump into the discussion right away. As soon as you start contributing to the
discussion, it has the potential of shutting down ideas—students are less like to
share alternative viewpoints. For example, if students start a discussion on Monday,
I will wait until Thursday to post (and I make sure students know this is my plan so
they don't think I have disappeared and I am not monitoring). This allows the
students to post their original position without being swayed by me. I monitor the
discussion, even though I don't post, during those first few days to get a sense of
who is participating, where the discussion is going, what themes are emerging, what
misconceptions need addressing, and so on. Then, on Thursday, I post to threads
of discussion instead of to every individual student post. This shows students that I
am attending to all of their comments, even though I do not have a 1to1 ratio of
post/response interactions.
Giving Learners a Role
19. Have learners assess the value of discussion contributions, e.g., assigning
Inspiration Points to each other. Inspiration points, modeled after the “karma
points” approach used by members of the online community (and
similar to the valuing process used by community members of Amazon and Ebay),
involve students in the evaluation of the quality of discussion contributions. The
idea behind inspiration points is that the learning community, not a moderator or
an instructor, should be responsible for (1) determining the value of community
members’ posting in terms of helping the community achieve specific goals, and (2)
awarding those valued contributions.
To make inspiration points work, I give each student a certain number of
inspiration points (e.g., three) that she or he can assign to valued discussion
contributions within a certain timeframe (e.g., by week’s end if online, or by the
end of the evening session if oncampus). Because the students are evaluating each
other, I work with them at the beginning of the semester to establish criteria for
determining “value” and then apply the criteria to their assessment of peers’
contributions and the creation of their own contributions. For example, inspiration
point criteria may include sharing original ideas, writing clearly, presenting a
coherent argument, providing evidence to support an argument, “listening” to
others and incorporating their ideas and perspectives and so on (see below for an
example of criteria).
Criteria for Inspiration Points
Here is how we will assign our allotment of inspiration points for each discussion:
0 points:
hough you may have introduced an interesting idea or
contributed to the discourse, it is not original enough, or is
somehow unclear.
1 point:
You provide a succinct, interesting, original, and welldocumented
argument or idea, or provide a useful link or pertinent fact.
2 points:
Your contribut
on is creative and original, and compellingly argues
a very clear point. You support your contribution with evidence.
3 points:
n exceptional contribution to the discourse
Ways to Improve Chances of Receiving Inspiration Points
Choose provocative subject lines to make our postings stand out.
Present our own perspectives.
Write clearly.
Construct an argument. Provide evidence, present a rationale that supports
our positions, and reference the opinions of others, linking to supplementary
evidence when appropriate.
Open up debate by remembering that the best response is one that gets
people thinking, and that makes them want to reply.
Learn from others who have posted before us by reading through the posts
and referring to appropriate posts in our own.
Rules for Assigning Inspiration Points
Only award inspiration points to those who have contributed significantly to the
discussion – vote trading is unacceptable. Award inspiration points based on the
quality of the message, irrespective of the content of the message – vote for
exceptional messages even if you do not necessarily agree with the ideas presented.
In my experience, the communitycentered focus of inspiration points improves the
quality of each post during a discussion because students are more reflective and
thoughtful about their responses, make sure their responses are supported by evidence,
and work hard to provide value to the learning community by moving the discussion
forward. By using inspiration points, I participate more in the discussion because
students have taken over part of or the entire evaluation role. The inspiration points
that students accumulate for their valued contributions to the discussion can be used to
determine a score for class participation.
20. Have learners write a onepage (e.g., 250 word) summary of the week’s (or
whatever unit of time used) discussion that includes a general overview of the
discussion, an excerpt of their most valuable contribution to the discussion, and an
explanation for why they consider it their best.
21. Ask the learners to become discussion leaders. Alternatively, have small groups of
learners facilitate a topic.
Engaging Quieter Learners
22. Use strategies such as inspiration points to encourage people to get involved.
23. Besides relevant and engaging activities, create a structure in which learners need to
post by a certain time and then respond to others by a certain time.
24. Organize learners into groups to make it more likely that everyone will have a
chance to participate—smaller discussion groups of between 5 and 10 learners can
make room for everyone to contribute.
25. Assign people specific roles in the discussion: facilitator, questioner, summarizer,
devil's advocate, and so on. Then, provide clear directions about what you do
specifically when you are assigned that role.
26. Involve learners in a debate, again with very specific role assignments for each
27. Put a limit on the number of posts (and length) that any one individual is allowed
to contribute.
28. Assign a response order/sequence and require each subsequent responder to post
something that extends the previous posts.
29. Use discussion protocols to guide participation, and make sure everyone in the
class has an opportunity to contribute. (See the resource - Protocols for online
Anderson, T. (2004). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson & F.
Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 273294). Athabasca, Canada:
Athabasca University.
Aragon, S. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for
Adult and Continuing Education. No. 100 (Winter 2003), 5768.
Bender, T. (2003). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning: Theory, practice and
assessment. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Dunlap, J. (2005). Workload reduction in online courses: Getting some shuteye.
Performance Improvement, 44(5), 1825.
Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction
within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of
Distance Education, 11(3), 626.
Huang, H. (2000). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning
environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 2737.
Hurst, D., & Thomas, J. (2004). Developing team skills and accomplishing team
projects online. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online
learning (pp. 195239). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University.
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence.
Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved November 15, 2004,
LudwigHardman, S., & Dunlap, J. (2003). Learner support services for online students:
Scaffolding for success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance
Learning, 4(1). Retrieved from
Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont,
CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco:
Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of
Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1). Retrieved from
... Immediacy, although accounts comparatively less for the students' choice of LINE for team interaction and communication, also poses a lack of direct access and synchronic tools for interaction in the university's LMS. In addition, LINE's immediacy may provide a high level of social presence of the team members, therefore reduces students' sense of social isolation and disengagement (Dunlap 2009). ...
... In terms of learner autonomy, I recommend before online discussion commences, students and instructors collaborate to develop a discussion guideline which enhances content discussion on the subject topics for online interactions in social media sites. An online discussion guideline may include items which encourage dissemination of new information and knowledge about the topic being discussed, exclusion of activities which divert content discussion, setting netiquette for online discussion (Dunlap 2009), to name a few. ...
Conference Paper
Abstract Purpose –In this paper, I explore the students’ use of a social media LINE and the online discussion forum in the formal Learning Management System (LMS) as tools for their team interaction and communication when doing a team project in online courses, with specific focus on modes of interaction in both platforms and student preferences for the two educational technologies. Design/methodology/approach – The subjects of study were the students who enrolled in two online-distance courses offered by the Department of Foreign Languages and Literature in an open university in 2017 and 2019 separately. The students in both courses were assigned team projects to finish as a part of their fulfillment of the courses. In the 2017 course, the participants were required to adopt the team discussion forum in the LMS as the tool for team interaction and communication, with LINE as an additional option. In the 2019 course, the students were free to choose the communication tool(s) they liked, either LINE or the team discussion forum in the LMS, or both. LINE is a communication app available in smartphones and computers with functionality for exchanging texts, images, video and audio, and conducting free Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) conversations and video conferences I use data drawn from student postings in LINE and the LMS team discussion forum in the 2017 course and a questionnaire survey in the 2019 course to offer insights into modes of interaction in LINE and the LMS team discussion forum and the reasons for students’ choice of a certain communication tool. Findings – Students preferred LINE over the LMS for team interaction and communication because of convenience, privacy, functionality, immediacy and popularity LINE possesses. Differences in modes of interactions appeared from the postings data. The students’ interaction in the LMS and LINE are both learning-oriented with collaboration, teamwork-related interaction and knowledge construction for task completion. In addition, LINE is also socializing-oriented with festival greetings, after-project interaction and project-irrelevant postings. Originality/value/implications – Social media platforms offer features and functionality that can be leveraged to supplement and complement the use of a traditional LMS. However, a comprehensive strategy is needed to successfully leverage social media into online learning, in terms of instructor absence in student discussion in the social networking platform. An integration model of merging social media platforms into LMSs is recommended to include teacher presence in students’ team discussion without interfering student privacy. Keywords: social media, Learning Management System (LMS), online distance learning (ODL), online interaction
... Subsequent online quizzes, discussion threads or email response activities can follow, encouraging students to engage with information, locate materials and form important connections (Dunlap & Lowenthal;Kolowich, 2010;Shank, 2011). Discussion sites have become a standard feature in online courses (Dunlap, 2009). However, although this seemingly "constructive" tool can actively engage students to avoid more static purely text-based experiences and to weave a FTF and online community (Parker, et al., 2013), they need to be created to benefit and support student learning in meaningful ways. ...
Full-text available
The national reform agenda for early childhood education and care across Australia has led to an increased demand for qualified early childhood teachers. In response, universities have developed innovative approaches in delivering early childhood teacher education courses designed to support existing diploma qualified educators to gain their teaching qualifications. One such course at a major Australian University incorporated a flexible multi-modal option of study which included community-based, on line e-learning and face-to-face intensive tutorials. This paper reports on a study examining the outcomes for students undertaking their studies using this course delivery mode. The study sought to examine the students’ perceptions of the efficacy of the teaching and learning approach in meeting their learning needs, and the factors that were most influential in informing these perceptions. The findings indicated that it was the inclusion of contact and a social presence in the online learning environment which was most influential.
Full-text available
Distance education over the years has been defined by the ability of students to learn at any time, from anywhere. Thus, it is not surprising that most online courses rely solely on asynchronous text-based online communication, such as email and discussion forums. However, the COVID- 19 pandemic and the rise of emergency remote teaching have sparked an increased interest in using web conferencing software (e.g., Zoom, WebEx, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams) to hold live synchronous meetings, often on a set day and time each week, instead of asynchronous discussions. But as convenient as it can be to move classroom instruction to live synchronous meetings, instructors and students have quickly experienced some drawbacks to using this mode of instruction. Given this problem, we set out to curate a list of strategies to improve the use of live synchronous meetings based on the literature and our combined experience designing and teaching online over the years. In this paper, we describe some affordances and constraints of live synchronous meetings and then describe some strategies that instructors can use to improve their use of these meetings, whether that be in a blended, remote, or online course.
Technology alone cannot create the sense of community that is needed for effective online learning. Participants in an online environment can perceive a sense of isolation when social connectedness is not created and encouraged. A community of inquiry emerges when online participants perceive that they are seen and heard and opportunities for active engagement with others is provided. This chapter provides guiding principles for an effective online experience and includes multiple suggestions from an experienced online instructor to create and maintain the social presence of all participants in any online learning experience.
Full-text available
Social presence theory explains how people present themselves as “real” through a communication medium and is a popular construct used to describe how people socially interact in online courses. Because of its intuitive appeal, educators—including ourselves—have experimented with different ways to establish social presence in their online courses. Over the years we’ve tried many strategies—from rich threaded discussions to personal one-on-one emails to digital stories to using social networking tools like Twitter. Over time, we began questioning how students perceive all of the strategies we use (in other words, what strategies were leading to the most bang for our buck). This case study shares the story of our quest for the social presence grail—from the strategies we use in our courses, to our research on students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of these strategies.
Books reviewed:Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice and Assessment. By Tisha Bender. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, 2003. xviii + 206 pages. ISBN 1-57922-065-7. $24.95 (paperback).
Since online learning has a different setting from the conventional classroom, online educators need to use some special techniques and perceptions to lead to success. Moreover, adults have special needs and requirements as learners compared with children and adolescents, thus online educators should know how adults can learn best because of their special characteristics. Philosophical and methodological shifts also affect instruction. Many researchers have suggested that constructivism should be applied in distance education. Thus, this paper attempts to examine the impact of constructivism in online learning environments when focusing on adult learners. The author develops the connection between constructivism and adult learning theory. In addition, the paper proposes instructional guidelines using the constructivist approach in online learning for adults.
This paper represents a review of the second edition of Distance Education: A Systems View by Michael Moore and Greg Kearsley (Thomas/Wadsworth, 2005). This second edition reflects a view of current applications of distance education, based on the vantage of instructional systems design. The strengths of the book are reflected in the uniqueness of its consideration of online courses, in particular from the point of view of systematic development and management.
Based on the GlobalEd inter‐university computer conference, this study examined how effective “social presence” is as a predictor of overall learner satisfaction in a text‐based medium. The stepwise regression analysis converged on a three‐predictor model revealing that social presence (the degree to which a person is perceived as “real” in mediated communication), student perception of having equal opportunity to participate, and technical skills accounted for about 68% of the explained variance. Social presence alone contributed about 60% of this variance, suggesting that it may be a very strong predictor of satisfaction. Reliability data on the social presence scale is provided. The results also indicated that participants who felt a higher sense of social presence enhanced their socio‐emotional experience by using emoticons to express missing nonverbal cues in written form. These findings have implications for designing academic computer conferences where equal attention must be paid to designing techniques that enhance social presence.
A number of emerging technologies including virtual reality, simulation rides, video conferencing, home theater, and high definition television are designed to provide media users with an illusion that a mediated experience is not mediated, a perception defined here as presence. Traditional media such as the telephone, radio, television, film, and many others offer a lesser degree of presence as well. This article examines the key concept of presence. It begins by noting practical and theoretical reasons for studying this concept. Six conceptualizations of presence found in a diverse set of literatures are identified and a detailed explication of the concept that incorporates these conceptualizations is presented. Existing research and speculation about the factors that encourage or discourage a sense of presence in media users as well as the physiological and psychological effects of presence are then outlined. Finally, suggestions concerning future systematic research about presence are presented.