Content uploaded by Han-Ting Zhang
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Han-Ting Zhang on Feb 21, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
PDE4 as a target for cognition enhancement
Wito Richter†,1, Frank S. Menniti2, Han-Ting Zhang3, and Marco Conti1
1University of California San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive
Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94143-0556, USA
2Mnemosyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Providence, RI, USA
3West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Departments of Behavioral Medicine &
Psychiatry and Physiology & Pharmacology, Morgantown, WV, USA
Abstract
Introduction—The second messengers cAMP and cGMP mediate fundamental aspects of brain
function relevant to memory, learning and cognitive functions. Consequently, cyclic nucleotide
phosphodiesterases (PDEs), the enzymes that inactivate the cyclic nucleotides, are promising
targets for the development of cognition-enhancing drugs.
Areas covered—PDE4 is the largest of the eleven mammalian PDE families. This review
covers the properties and functions of the PDE4 family, highlighting procognitive and memory-
enhancing effects associated with their inactivation.
Expert opinion—PAN-selective PDE4 inhibitors exert a number of memory- and cognition-
enhancing effects and have neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties in preclinical
models. The major hurdle for their clinical application is to target inhibitors to specific PDE4
isoforms relevant to particular cognitive disorders to realize the therapeutic potential while
avoiding side effects, in particular emesis and nausea. The PDE4 family comprises four genes,
PDE4A-D, each expressed as multiple variants. Progress to date stems from characterization of
rodent models with selective ablation of individual PDE4 subtypes, revealing that individual
subtypes exert unique and non-redundant functions in the brain. Thus, targeting specific PDE4
subtypes, as well as splicing variants or conformational states, represents a promising strategy to
separate the therapeutic benefits from the side effects of PAN-PDE4 inhibitors.
Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease; schizophrenia; cognition; memory; cyclic nucleotide; cAMP;
phosphodiesterase; PDE4; Rolipram
†Author for correspondence; richterw@obgyn.ucsf.edu; Tel: +1 415 502 2005; Fax: +1 415 476 3121 .
Declaration of Interest Work in the authors’ laboratories is supported by NIH grants HL107960 (WR), AG031687 and AA020042
(HTZ), and HL0927088 (MC). Frank Menniti is an employee of Mnemosyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Providence, RI. Han-Ting Zhang
is a consultant for Asubio Pharamaceuticals, Paramus, NJ and TAKEDA Pharmaceuticals, Tokyo, Japan, and received financial
support from Lundbeck, Copenhagen, Denmark. Marco Conti is a consultant for Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
Published in final edited form as:
Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013 September ; 17(9): 1011–1027. doi:10.1517/14728222.2013.818656.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
1. Introduction/Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) and cognition
Cognition is a broad term that encompasses the ability of the brain to process and store
information and then analyze this information in the context of the present to respond and
plan for the future. While cognitive dysfunction is a prominent feature of all
neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases [1], the nature of the dysfunction and its
cause is disease specific. In autism and schizophrenia, for example, cognitive dysfunction
arises from defects early or late in brain development.
As life expectancy in the industrialized world has steadily increased over the past century, so
has the prevalence of age-related diseases of the brain. These are generally associated with
memory loss and cognitive impairment as exemplified by Alzheimer’s disease and other
forms of dementia as well as Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease. Despite
significant research and development efforts, there remains a large unmet need for
cognition-enhancing drugs. The drugs currently in use for dementia, acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists, for example, show only limited effectiveness
and do not provide lasting benefits as the patient’s status inevitably declines over time, nor
are there drugs that slow, arrest, or reverse the progressive neurodegeneration [2]. For
autism and schizophrenia, there are no drugs to treat the cognitive deficits, let alone
ameliorate the developmental defects. Cyclic nucleotide (cAMP and cGMP) signaling is
fundamentally involved in brain mechanisms that actively mediate cognitive processes, as
well as in brain development and homeostasis that provides the milieu for cognition. As a
consequence, there has been significant interest in targeting cyclic nucleotide
phosphodiesterases (PDEs), the enzymes that hydrolyze and inactivate these second
messengers, as cognition-enhancing drugs [3-8].
1.1. The superfamily of mammalian PDEs
The mammalian PDEs comprise a superfamily of enzymes that are encoded by 21 genes.
These are divided into eleven PDE families based on sequence homology, pharmacological
properties and substrate specificity [9]. Of the eleven PDE families, three include enzymes
that selectively hydrolyze cAMP (PDE4, PDE7 and PDE8), three comprise enzymes
selective for cGMP (PDE5, PDE6, and PDE9) and the remaining five PDE families
hydrolyze both cyclic nucleotides (PDE1, PDE2, PDE3, PDE10 and PDE11). Most PDE
genes are expressed as multiple variants due to alternative splicing and use of multiple
promoter/transcription start sites. As a result, up to 100 individual PDE proteins are
expressed in mammals. Individual PDEs differ not only in their catalytic properties but also
in their tissue and cell-specific expression pattern, their subcellular localization as
determined by protein/protein or protein/lipid interactions and the regulation of their
catalytic activity by post-translational modifications and allosteric regulators [10]. This
complexity provides the body with an array of PDE isoforms with precise functions, and
provides us with an array of unique targets for drug development.
1.2. PDEs as a target for cognition enhancement
Almost all PDE genes are expressed in the brain, which also expresses the highest level of
PDE activity of any tissue. This underlines the importance of tightly controlling the second
Richter et al. Page 2
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
messengers cAMP and cGMP in an organ whose primary purpose is the processing of
information via cell signaling. Intriguingly, almost all PDE families are being considered as
targets for treating central nervous system (CNS) disorders. However, although inhibition of
many PDEs produces potentially beneficial CNS effects, the mechanisms by which such
effects are generated must clearly be distinct given the differences among individual PDEs,
particularly their differential cellular and subcellular localization as well as substrate
specificity and kinetics. In line with this idea, inhibitors of distinct PDE families have been
shown to affect different stages of memory consolidation [11]. Individual brain diseases
exhibit distinct forms of cognitive deficits and are associated with defective development or
degeneration in different regions of the brain. Thus, distinct PDEs may be targeted for
therapeutic benefits for different diseases, and matching the right PDE target with each CNS
disorder is critical for drug development. This review discusses the potential of targeting
members of the PDE4 family, the largest of the eleven PDE families, for cognition
enhancement. See [7] for a review on other CNS PDEs as targets for drug development.
2. The PDE4 family as a target for cognition enhancement
The PDE4 family comprises four genes, PDE4A to D. PDE4s are easily distinguished from
other cAMP-PDEs by their kinetic properties and, particularly, their sensitivity to inhibition
by the prototypical PDE4 inhibitor, Rolipram. Soon after their discovery more than 30 years
ago, several lines of evidence indicated a role for PDE4s in regulating brain function. First,
PDE4s are widely expressed throughout the body, but highest concentrations are found in
brain. Second, the mammalian PDE4s are orthologs of the dunce gene of Drosophila
melanogaster, whose ablation produces a phenotype of impaired learning and memory in the
fly [12-14]. And third, the prototypical PDE4 inhibitor Rolipram was shown to exert
behavioral and antidepressant effects in rats and humans [15-17]. Since then, a plethora of
other CNS effects have been reported for PAN-PDE4 inhibitors in preclinical models
including memory- and cognition-enhancing effects as well as neuroprotective and
neuroregenerative properties. More recently, the characterization of knock-out mice for
individual PDE4 genes as well as siRNA-mediated knock-down has clearly established that
individual PDE4 subtypes and splicing variants play unique and non-overlapping roles
[9,18]. Thus, distinct PDE4 proteins could be specifically targeted for therapeutic benefits in
different CNS diseases.
2.1. Structure and regulation of PDE4
Each of the four PDE4 genes is expressed as multiple variants, together generating more
than 25 individual proteins. These share a highly conserved catalytic domain and, thus,
exhibit very similar kinetic properties. The catalytic domains are flanked by N- and C-
terminal domains that function to regulate enzyme activity, provide mechanisms of crosstalk
with other pathways, and determine the subcellular localization of these enzymes (Figure 1)
[10,19]. The distinctive structural elements of the PDE4 family are two highly conserved N-
terminal domains termed Upstream Conserved Regions 1 and 2 (UCR1 and UCR2). PDE4
splice variants are divided into long and short forms based on the presence or absence of the
UCR domains. Long forms contain a complete set of UCR domains, whereas short forms
lack UCR1 but still retain UCR2, either in its entirety or as a fragment. Highlighting the
Richter et al. Page 3
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
critical role of the UCR domains, the presence or absence of UCR1 entails critical structural
and functional differences between long and short forms including oligomerization,
regulation of enzyme activity by binding allosteric ligands or post-translational modification
as well as inhibitor sensitivity. The UCR1/2 module mediates oligomerization of long PDE4
forms, whereas short PDE4s are monomers and this difference in quaternary structure is
responsible for distinct sensitivities of long and short forms towards the prototypical PDE4
inhibitor Rolipram [20,21]. The UCR1 domain contains a consensus PKA-phosphorylation
site that is conserved among all long forms and phosphorylation at this site induces
activation of long PDE4s [22,23]. This PKA-mediated PDE4 activation constitutes a critical
negative feedback loop whereby elevated levels of cAMP promote their own destruction
[23-25]. The UCR1 domain also contains a docking site for phosphatidic acid that acts as an
allosteric activator of long PDE4s [26,27]. Short forms not only lack the PKA- and
phosphatidic acid-mediated regulation of enzyme activity, but also respond differently to
post-translation modifications that they share with long forms. PDE4B, PDE4C and PDE4D
variants, for example, contain a conserved ERK2 phosphorylation site at their C-termini.
Phosphorylation at this ERK2 site induces inhibition of long variants, whereas
phosphorylation of short forms induces enzyme activation or has no effect on enzyme
activity [28,29]. The extreme N-termini of PDE4 variants are generally encoded by variant-
specific exons and are, thus, unique to each individual variant. These domains are often
involved in intracellular targeting of PDE4s via protein/protein or protein/lipid interactions,
thus providing the cell with a diverse set of PDE4 variants that can be sequestered/localized
to control distinct subcellular pools of cAMP [19].
2.2. Memory- and cognition-enhancing effects of PAN-selective PDE4 inhibitors
To date, the pharmacological tools to investigate the PDE4s have been limited to catalytic-
site competitive inhibitors such as Rolipram with very limited selectivity for different
isoforms. Nonetheless, there is now a substantial number of preclinical studies with such
compounds demonstrating that PDE4 inactivation improves learning and memory in a
variety of behavioral tests. These include spatial working and reference memory tests, object
recognition memory tasks and passive avoidance and fear conditioning paradigms [30-34].
While most studies were performed in mice and rats, cognition-enhancing effects of PDE4
inhibitors have also been demonstrated in monkeys [35] suggesting that memory
enhancement can be achieved in a range of mammalian species and this posit might also
apply to humans.
Importantly, cognition- and memory-enhancing effects of PDE4 inhibition are not only
observed in normal, healthy animals but have also been shown to ameliorate and/or reverse
memory deficits induced by a range of manipulations that simulate age- and/or disease-
related memory impairments. These include memory-deficits induced by the muscarinic
acetylcholine receptor antagonist scopolamine in novel object recognition and spatial
memory tasks [31,36-40] as well as memory and cognition impairments induced by the N-
methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801 [39,41,42], the MEK inhibitor
U0126 [43] or by acute tryptophan depletion [44]. PDE4 inhibition was also shown to
ameliorate cerebral ischemia-induced neuron loss and associated memory deficits in rats
suggesting a potential for PDE4 inhibitors to prevent memory-loss in stroke patients [45]. Of
Richter et al. Page 4
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
particular relevance for preventing age-dependent decline in memory and cognition are
studies showing that PDE4 inhibition can ameliorate memory deficits due to aging [30,46],
but see [47].
PDE4 inhibition also reversed memory deficits in genetic models of human disease in
rodents. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, for example, is a genetic disease characterized by
defects in the CREB-binding protein (CBP). PDE4 inhibition improves long-term memory
in a mouse model of impaired CBP suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit of PDE4
inhibitors for Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome [48]. Several studies revealed a potential for
PDE4 inhibitors to reverse memory deficits induced by β-amyloid, suggesting a therapeutic
potential for PDE4 inhibitors in treating Alzheimers’ disease. Rolipram reverses β-amyloid-
induced inhibition of the PKA/p-CREB pathway as well as long-term potentiation (LTP) in
cultured hippocampal neurons [49] and PDE4 inhibitors showed similar effectiveness in a
double transgenic mouse expressing amyloid precursor protein and presenilin-1
(APP(K670N/M671L)/PS1 mice) [50]. Rolipram treatment improves LTP and synaptic
transmission as well as working, reference and associative memory deficits in this model,
which replicates synaptic and cognitive impairments of Alzheimer’s [50]. Finally, inhibition
of PDE4 reverses memory deficits induced by β-amyloid peptide infusion in the brains of
rats. Rolipram treatment counteracts β-amyloid-induced deficits in CREB phosphorylation
in the hippocampus as well as behavioral deficits in the Morris water maze and passive
avoidance tasks [51,52]. PDE4 inhibition also reversed memory deficits and oxidative stress
induced by intracerebroventricular administration of streptozotocin; a model of experimental
sporadic dementia [53], suggesting a potential of PDE4 inhibition for reducing cognitive
decline in a range of settings.
Importantly, memory- and cognition-enhancing effects are not only observed with Rolipram,
but also with structurally unrelated PDE4 inhibitors [31-33,39,53], suggesting that these are
class effects and result directly from inactivation of PDE4s. This conclusion is further
confirmed by studies employing genetic downregulation or ablation of PDE4 subtypes, in
particular PDE4D, as described in more detail below.
Although their cognition- and memory-enhancing effects are now well established, the
mechanism of action of PDE4 inhibitors and the downstream targets that mediate their
procognitive effects are less well defined. There is strong evidence that PDE4 inactivation
stimulates and/or reverses deficits in PKA/p-CREB signaling induced by pharmacological
agents, aging or disease [8,34,48,49,51,52,54,55] but may also act via regulation of
neurotransmitter release [44,56] (Figure 2). Mechanistically, PDE4 inactivation serves to
enhance LTP as well as promote synaptic plasticity [30,49,50,57,58]. Consistent with these
results, pharmacologically-induced increases in PDE4, in particular PDE4D, reduce cAMP
levels in the hippocampus and impair long-term memory in the water-maze test [59].
2.3. Neuroprotective, neuroregenerative and anti-inflammatory properties of PAN-PDE4
inhibitors
In addition to affecting active cognitive mechanisms, PDE4 inhibition may prevent
disruption of brain homeostasis that results in cognitive dysfunction. This includes
promoting neurogenesis and exerting neuroprotective and regenerative as well as anti-
Richter et al. Page 5
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
inflammatory effects (Figure 2). In one of the earliest studies revealing a neuroprotective
effect of PDE4 inhibition, Yamashita et. al. demonstrated increased survival of cultured
dopaminergic neurons upon Rolipram treatment [60]. Since then, a number of studies
reported neuroprotective properties of PDE4 inhibitors in preclinical models where they may
act via suppression of apoptosis, promotion of neurogenesis, a reduction of oxidative stress
as well as attenuation of inflammatory responses [45,52,53,61,62]. Specifically, PDE4
inhibition was shown to ameliorate cerebral ischemia-induced neuron loss in hippocampal
region CA1 and associated memory deficits in rats, suggesting a potential for PDE4
inhibitors to prevent memory loss in stroke patients [45]. In addition, PDE4 inhibition
reversed memory deficits and oxidative stress after intracerebroventricular administration of
streptozotocin, a model of experimental sporadic dementia [53], and knockout or knock-
down of PDE4D and/or inhibition of PDE4 with Rolipram has been shown to promote
neurogenesis in hippocampus [34,54,55].
Intriguingly, PDE4 inhibition potently reversed cognitive impairments and
neuroinflammatory responses induced by treatment with β-amyloid peptides including
microglia activation, activation of NFκB and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as
TNFα. These findings strongly imply a potential for PDE4 inhibitors to treat Alzheimer’s
disease [52,62].
Finally, PDE4 inhibition has been shown to promote axonal regeneration and functional
recovery as well as a reduction in inflammatory responses and astrogliosis after spinal cord
injury [61,63].
2.4. Not all cAMP signaling is procognitive
A complication in the development of PDE4 inhibitors as memory- and cognition-enhancing
drugs is the fact that cAMP/PKA activation (in general, and after PDE4 inhibition in
particular) does not exclusively exert procognitive effects. A case in point is the Drosophila
dunce gene. The phosphodiesterase encoded by the dunce gene is the evolutionary ancestor
of the mammalian PDE4s and its role in olfactory learning provided the first indication that
PDE4s regulate CNS functions. However, while inhibition of the mammalian PDE4s is
pursued as a way to improve memory and cognition, inactivating mutations in the dunce
gene result in memory impairment, specifically impairment of early memory formation
[12,14]. Although a large majority of studies attest to positive memory- and cognition
enhancing effects of PDE4 inactivation, pharmacologic and/or genetic ablation of the
mammalian PDE4s have also been shown to impair learning and memory in some
paradigms [47,64-66]. Given the multitude of downstream targets and cellular functions
regulated by cAMP/PKA signaling, it is not surprising that cAMP signaling does not
exclusively exert beneficial effects on memory and cognition, but may also induce some
untoward effects (see [67]).
Even in cAMP pathways that are therapeutically relevant, the level of PDE4 inhibition is
critical to realize pro-cognitive effects. Physiological cAMP signals are generally short lived
and the shape of cAMP transients is critical to induce the appropriate cellular responses [68].
Amplifying the cAMP transient may serve to amplify the cellular responses and thereby
mediate therapeutic benefits. However, increasing cAMP levels above a certain threshold to
Richter et al. Page 6
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
supraphysiologic levels may essentially disrupt signaling, as downstream effectors are
chronically switched on. Such conditions likely trigger compensatory mechanisms at other
steps to desensitize the cAMP signaling cascade and these compensatory effects, rather than
increased cAMP signaling per se, might induce memory and cognitive deficits (see for
example [59]). This hypothesis fits well with some of the scenarios where PDE4 inactivation
produces deficits. Memory deficits in R6 mice, a model of Huntington’s disease, for
example, are associated with a reduced expression of hippocampal PDE4s and
hyperactivation of PKA [64]. Importantly, while acute PDE4 inhibition is generally
memory-enhancing, chronic treatment of wild type mice with high doses of Rolipram (22
days; 5 mg/kg/day i.p.) produced a similar upregulation of PKA activity and associated
learning and memory deficits, but had no further effect in R6 mice [64]. Conversely, lower
doses of Rolipram have shown neuroprotective effects in models of Huntington’s disease,
including the R6 mice [69,70]. High doses of Rolipram also impaired prefrontal cortical
function in aged, but not young monkeys, and the age-specific effects may be due to the fact
that the cAMP/PKA pathway is already disinhibited in the aged prefrontal cortex [47,67].
Thus, PDE4 inhibition may exert deleterious effects on memory and cognition under
conditions in which PDE4s are already downregulated and cAMP levels and PKA activity
are elevated. On the other hand, targeting PDE4s can be expected to mediate beneficial
effects in diseases characterized by cognitive deficits resulting from reduced/impaired
cAMP/PKA signaling. Under these circumstances, PDE inactivation can serve to reverse
memory and cognition deficits by restoring “normal” cAMP signaling. The untoward effects
induced by cAMP/PKA hyperstimulation may also suggest that submaximal doses of PDE4
inhibitors that induce partial, rather than full inhibition of the enzymes might be more
effective for memory- and cognition-enhancement.
2.5. Challenges in PDE4 inhibitor development
The PDE4 family is the most complex PDE family and arguably the most widely expressed
PDE throughout the human body. As its members contribute a significant portion of total
cAMP hydrolyzing activity in many mammalian cells and tissues, it is not surprising that
PDE4 inactivation produces a range of physiological effects that can be exploited for drug
development for multiple indications including, but by no means limited to memory- and
cognition-enhancement [18]. At the same time however, the ubiquitous expression of PDE4s
in human cells and tissues constitutes the major obstacle to the clinical application of PDE4
inhibitors for any indication, as PAN-PDE4 inactivation is bound to trigger a range of
effects, including dose-limiting side effects. Of these, by far the most serious are nausea and
emesis.
Adverse gastrointestinal effects including emesis, nausea and diarrhea are the main side
effects associated with PAN-PDE4 inhibitors. They were first reported for the prototypical
PDE4 inhibitor Rolipram [15,71,72] and are shared to varying degrees by all PAN-PDE4
inhibitors. Thus, emesis and nausea are clearly class effects of PDE4 inhibitors. They are
likely due to inhibition of PDE4 in brain regions responsible for the emetic reflex, such as
the area postrema and nucleus of the solitary tract in which PDE4 is highly expressed
[73-75] as well as PDE4 inhibition in the gut, and remain the main obstacles for PDE4
inhibitor development today.
Richter et al. Page 7
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
The finding that PDE4 inactivation can induce development of heart failure in mice [76] and
promote arrhythmias in mice as well as human atrial strips ex vivo [76-78] raises the
question of whether PDE4 inactivation might also induce cardiac toxicities in humans. In
addition, SNPs in PDE4D that are associated with reduced PDE4D expression have been
identified as a risk factor for stroke [79] and high doses of at least one PDE4 inhibitor, SCH
351591, have been shown to cause vasculitis in monkeys [80]. However, long-term clinical
trials with the PDE4 inhibitor Roflumilast did not uncover significantly increased incidences
of adverse cardiovascular events suggesting that, at least at the doses given, PAN-PDE4
inhibition with Roflumilast does not cause cardiovascular toxicities in humans [81,82].
In summary, there is an impressive breadth of data supporting the idea that PDE4 inhibition
may improve cognitive function in a range of conditions and by multiple mechanisms. On
the other hand, because of the widespread distribution of PDE4 isoforms in the brain and
elsewhere in the body, PAN-PDE4 inhibitors have significant liabilities that have precluded
their clinical use for the treatment of neuropsychiatric and cognitive dysfunction. Thus,
interest has turned to identifying the particular PDE4 isoforms that are most relevant as
targets for cognition enhancement while avoiding the side effects that have so far precluded
drug development. To date, the focus has been on investigating the role of individual PDE4
subtypes, PDE4A-D. This has been enabled by the availability of knock-out mice and other
genetic means of manipulating the expression of these isoforms.
3. Role of individual PDE4 subtypes
Messenger RNA and the corresponding proteins for PDE4 subtypes PDE4A, PDE4B and
PDE4D are abundantly expressed and widely distributed in the mammalian brain. Detailed
analyses reveal that the expression patterns of individual PDE4 subtypes are clearly distinct
at the regional and cellular level suggesting that each PDE4 subtype may serve unique
functions [73,83-85]. This conclusion is further reinforced when expression patterns of
individual PDE4 variants, rather than all variants generated from the same gene, are
determined [73,83,86-91]. Unfortunately, the subcellular distribution of PDE4 variants has
remained largely unexplored, a gap that needs to be filled to facilitate rational target
identification. Despite some differences, the expression patterns of PDE4A, PDE4B and
PDE4D show substantial similarity in the brain of rodents, monkeys and humans. This
indicates a conservation of PDE functions and suggests that findings in animal models may
also apply in humans.
In line with the idea of specialized functions for individual PDE4s, characterization of
rodent models with genetic inactivation of individual PDE4 subtypes confirm the idea that
individual PDE4 subtypes exert unique and non-redundant functions. The effect of PDE4
subtype ablation on allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity is a good example to illustrate
this point. Ablation of PDE4A, PDE4B or PDE4D in mice mimics the effect of PAN-
selective PDE4 inhibition in ablating allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity [18,92-94].
However, the mechanisms of action appear to be distinct, with PDE4D inactivation ablating
airway smooth muscle contractility [94], PDE4B ablation impairing inflammatory responses
by reducing infiltration of immune cells and the release of inflammatory cytokines
[18,93,95], and PDE4A ablation acting via a yet unknown mechanism. By analogy, it may
Richter et al. Page 8
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
be anticipated that ablation of the different PDE4s may overlap in mimicking the
procognitive effects of PAN-PDE4 inhibitors at the behavioral level, but do so by different
cellular mechanisms. The current literature on the expression and cognitive functions of
individual PDE4 subtypes, which is beginning to address this question, is discussed below.
3.1. PDE4A
PDE4A is expressed in multiple regions of the mammalian brain with high levels found in
cerebral cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum [73,84,85,88]. Multiple PDE4A variants,
including PDE4A1, PDE4A4/5, PDE4A8 and PDE4A10 are present, and exhibit clearly
distinct localization patterns [87,88,96]. PDE4A expression levels are altered in certain
patient populations, including patients with bipolar disorder and autism [97,98], providing a
first association between PDE4A function and CNS disorders.
Although its brain expression pattern suggests a role for PDE4A in cognition and memory,
the effect of PDE4A ablation on cognitive functions has not been probed directly as yet
because subtype-selective PDE4A inhibitors are not available and PDE4A-KO mice were
generated only recently [93]. Nonetheless, there is some circumstantial evidence for a role
for PDE4A in memory processes. Brief sleep deprivation, for example, produces deficits of
synaptic plasticity and hippocampus-dependent memory in mice via increased expression of
specific PDE4A variants and impaired cAMP/PKA signaling in the hippocampus [99].
Treatment with the PAN-PDE4 inhibitor Rolipram reverses the deficits of both synaptic
plasticity and memory suggesting a role for PDE4A in this paradigm of sleep-deprivation-
induced memory deficit. Inhibition of PDE4A may also be the mechanism by which PAN-
PDE4 inhibitors attenuate memory deficits induced by the NMDA receptor antagonist
MK-801 [39,41] given that NMDA receptor activity controls PDE4A expression in cultured
neurons [100].
3.2. PDE4B
PDE4B is widely distributed throughout the brain in rodents, monkeys and humans, with
high levels of expression found in the striatum, amygdala, thalamus and hypothalamus
[73,84,85,90]. Long term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampal neurons was found associated
with changes in expression and subcellular localization of PDE4B providing a first
association between PDE4B and learning and memory [101-103]. The PAN-PDE4 inhibitor
Rolipram affects synaptic plasticity by promoting both LTP as well as long-term depression
(LTD) [30,57,104]. Interestingly, mice deficient in PDE4B show enhanced LTD, whereas
LTP is not affected [66]. Conversely, mice deficient in PDE4D show enhanced LTP without
an effect on LTD [65]. These findings may suggest that the effects of PDE4 inhibition on
LTP and LTD are mediated via inactivation of distinct PDE4 subtypes, which would support
the idea that individual PDE4 subtypes play unique and non-overlapping roles. However,
mice deficient in PDE4B behaved similarly to wild type controls in a series of behavioral
tests including passive avoidance tests, the Morris water-maze task, the hot plate and the
elevated plus maze test as well as in fear conditioning models, suggesting that inactivation
of PDE4B is not the primary mechanism by which PAN-PDE4 inhibitors enhance memory
in these and similar models [66,105,106].
Richter et al. Page 9
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
PDE4B may be attractive as a therapeutic target for memory and cognition impairment
associated with age-dependent or neurodegenerative diseases through different mechanisms,
namely through neuroprotective, neuroregenerative and anti-inflammatory activities. In line
with this idea, an increase in the proliferation of neuronal cells in the hippocampal dentate
gyrus has been reported for PDE4B-deficient mice [106] and the well-established anti-
inflammatory properties of PDE4B inactivation [18,95] may limit neuroinflammation and,
thus, disease progression in Alzheimer’s [107]. Indeed, recent reports have shown that β-
amyloid-induced microglia activation is associated with increased expression of PDE4B and
that treatment with PDE4 inhibitors may limit microglia activation by reducing TNFα
release [62].
Several lines of evidence have implicated PDE4B in schizophrenia. Disruption of PDE4B by
a balanced translocation resulted in schizophrenia in a Scottish patient [108] and PDE4B has
been shown to interact with DISC1 (disrupted in schizophrenia 1), a well-established risk
factor for schizophrenia [108,109]. In addition, several studies have identified single
nucleotide polymorphisms in the PDE4B gene that were associated with schizophrenia
[108,110-113], but see [114,115]. Finally, a decrease in the levels of PDE4B expression in
post-mortem brains of schizophrenia patients has been reported [110]. In behavioral models
relevant to schizophrenia, mice deficient in PDE4B evidenced a complex phenotype of
reduced prepulse inhibition, reduced spontaneous locomotor activity but exaggerated
locomotor activity in response to high doses of amphetamine [105]. Further study is
warranted to understand the role of PDE4B dysfunction and the ways in which this subtype
may be targeted in treatment of different aspects of schizophrenia.
Cognitive dysfunction is one of the major problems associated with chronic alcohol
consumption [116]. Since Rolipram reduces alcohol consumption and alcohol preference in
animals drinking excessive alcohol [117,118], PDE4 inhibitors may produce beneficial
effects in alcoholics. PDE4B may be important in this paradigm given its enrichment in the
striatum and nucleus accumbens, which regulate alcohol intake and cognition related to drug
abuse [119].
Finally, PDE4B-KO mice display a range of anxiogenic-like behaviors including reduced
exploratory activity in hole board, light-dark transition and open-field tests [106]. Clearly,
PDE4B plays multiple, complex roles in brain physiology and the regulation of behavior
that may be exploited for therapeutic benefit.
3.3 PDE4C
Expression of PDE4C in the brain is limited, with some mRNA detected in the olfactory
bulb in rats, and in several cortical areas and the cerebellum in humans and monkeys
[84,85]. Low cellular and tissue expression levels of a PDE do not exclude important
functions for this enzyme per se, as PDEs may exert critical functions by acting in
subcellular microdomains of signaling. The role of PDE4C is largely unexplored, however,
because research tools, such as knock-out animals or subtype-selective inhibitors have not
been available to study the subtype-selective inactivation of PDE4C.
Richter et al. Page 10
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
3.4. PDE4D
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that PDE4D is a primary target through which PAN-
selective PDE4 inhibitors exert memory- and cognition-enhancing effects. PDE4D is highly
expressed in hippocampal formations [73,85,89] and mice deficient in PDE4D display
enhanced LTP in hippocampal CA1 [65]. Notably, RNAi-mediated downregulation
(PDE4D-KD) or genetic ablation of PDE4D (PDE4D-KO) in mice replicates a series of
behavioral phenotypes that define the memory- and cognition-enhancing properties of PDE4
inhibitors, which include improvement in spatial memory and object recognition tests
[34,120]. Treatment with PDE4 inhibitors improved cognitive function in wild type mice,
but had no further effect in PDE4D-KO or PDE4D-KD mice, suggesting that ablation of
PDE4D is sufficient to promote cognition and memory enhancements. Analogous to the
effects of PDE4 inhibitors, genetic ablation of PDE4D increased cAMP/PKA/p-CREB
signaling and promoted hippocampal neurogenesis [34]. Finally, PDE4 inhibitors with some
selectivity for PDE4D showed similar efficacy in enhancing memory and cognition as the
non-selective inhibitor Rolipram [31,36,39]. Somewhat surprisingly, knock-down of PDE4D
in rats [121] did not reproduce the improvements in spatial memory observed with PDE4
inhibitors or genetic ablation of PDE4D in mice. PDE4D-KO mice also showed impaired
learning in fear-conditioning paradigms [65] suggesting that PDE4D ablation may produce
distinct effects in different behavioral tests depending on the type of memory probed and the
brain region involved.
In addition to memory enhancement, genetic ablation of PDE4D in mice or down-regulation
of PDE4D expression in mice and rats produced behavioral phenotypes indicative of
antidepressant activity such as decreased immobility in tail-suspension and forced-swim-
tests [120-122]. These phenotypes recapitulate the established antidepressant effects of
PAN-PDE4 inhibitors in the same paradigms. PDE4 inhibitors produced no further effects in
PDE4DKO mice [122], identifying PDE4D as a critical target for the antidepressant
properties of PANPDE4 inhibitors.
4. Approaches for developing the next generation of PDE4 inhibitors
Current approaches for limiting the side effects associated with PAN-PDE4 inhibitors are
based on the same general idea: develop compounds that selectively inhibit only a fraction
of the total PDE4 present in the body. The underlying idea is to separate the therapeutically
beneficial from the unwanted side effects by increasing the specificity of inhibitors for the
fraction of PDE4 mediating the former, such as memory- and cognition-enhancing effects.
4.1. Targeting conformational states of PDE4 - HARBS/LARBS
PDE4s exist in at least two distinct conformational states, termed high-affinity Rolipram
binding state (HARBS) and low-affinity Rolipram binding state (LARBS), which are
revealed by their distinct affinities for the prototypical PDE4 inhibitor Rolipram. The
potency of PDE4 inhibitors to induce emesis appears more closely correlated with their
affinity for HARBS. Conversely, LARBS is prevalent in peripheral cells and tissues and
mediates many of the well-established anti-inflammatory properties of PDE4 inhibitors
[123,124]. This prompted the idea that compounds with bias towards LARBS over HARBS
Richter et al. Page 11
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
would mediate therapeutic benefits (specifically anti-inflammatory effects) without inducing
emesis. Drug development efforts to this end resulted in several compounds with some
selectivity towards LARBS or at least similar affinities for both conformational states.
Roflumilast, which is used for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) and is the only PDE4 inhibitor approved for any indication to date, is an example of
this class of compounds [81,82]. Although emesis and nausea remain its predominant side
effects, Roflumilast has a wider therapeutic window compared to Rolipram and the fact that
Roflumilast binds with similar affinity to both HARBS and LARBS is likely one of the
reasons for the success of this compound.
Although a preferential interaction with LARBS is a worthwhile approach for the
development of PDE4 inhibitors as anti-inflammatory drugs, this strategy might not be
suitable for therapeutics targeting the CNS because HARBS is highly enriched in the brain
and some of the therapeutically beneficial effects of PDE4 inhibitors, including their
memory- and cognition-enhancing properties, may well be due to inhibition of HARBS.
Indeed, the antidepressant effects of Rolipram have been associated with Rolipram-binding
to HARBS [125].
4.2. Subtype-selective PDE4 inhibitors
With the characterization of knock-out mice deficient in individual PDE4 genes, it was
clearly established that individual PDE4 subtypes play unique and often non-overlapping
physiological and pathophysiological roles [18,95,126]. Development of subtype-selective
PDE4 inhibitors may thus open the opportunity to dissect therapeutically beneficial from the
side effects of PDE4 inhibitors in so far as they are mediated by distinct PDE4 subtypes.
Although the catalytic domains of PDE4 subtypes are composed largely of conserved
residues, several compounds with selectivity towards either PDE4B [127-130] or PDE4D
[31,36,131] have now been reported suggesting that compounds with high selectivity for
individual PDE4 subtypes can eventually be developed.
Importantly, the duration of α2-adrenoceptor-mediated xylazine/ketamine-induced
anesthesia, a correlate of emesis in rodents, was found to be shortened in mice deficient in
PDE4D, but unaffected in mice deficient in PDE4B [132]. This has led to the hypothesis that
emesis is mediated by inhibition of PDE4D, but not PDE4B, and that, thus, PDE4B-
selective inhibitors would be nonemetic. As ablation of PDE4B mediates many of the anti-
inflammatory properties of PAN-PDE4 inhibitors, development of subtype-selective PDE4B
inhibitors has become a major focus for the development of these PDE4 inhibitors as anti-
inflammatory drugs. PDE4B-selective inhibitors may also be attractive therapeutics for CNS
disorders, including for schizophrenia [110] as well as diseases associated with
neuroinflammation including Alzheimer’s [62,107] (see Section 3.2.).
As a word of caution, PDE4A, PDE4B and PDE4D mRNAs are expressed in the area
postrema and the nucleus of the solitary tract, areas associated with emetic responses
[75,85,89,90,132]. Thus, the hypothesis that PDE4B inhibitors are non-emetic needs to be
confirmed in humans. In addition, the role of PDE4A in emesis remains to be determined.
Richter et al. Page 12
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
4.3. Allosteric modulators
Burgin and co-workers recently reported development of so-called “allosteric PDE4D
modulators” that exert potent pro-cognitive and anti-inflammatory effects in animal models
[31]. Allosteric modulators do not behave as pure competitive inhibitors at the active site
and do not completely inhibit enzyme activity. The authors propose that the limited
magnitude of PDE4 inhibition may serve to maintain basal aspects of cAMP signaling and
thereby improve tolerability compared to active-site-directed “full” inhibitors. Whether this
hypothesis is correct remains to be confirmed, given that the procognitive effects as well as
the emetic effects of conventional PDE4 inhibitors also occur at well below maximum
inhibition. It will be of interest to determine whether allosteric modulators of other PDE4
subtypes can also be developed.
4.4. Displacement of PDE4s from macro-molecular signaling complexes
There is now a large body of evidence suggesting that PDEs/PDE4s function in
microdomains of signaling that are generated by macromolecular signaling complexes and
to which PDEs are tethered via protein/protein or protein/lipid interactions (for a recent
review see: [19]). Thus, it may be sufficient to displace PDE4s from critical signaling
complexes rather than inhibit their catalytic activity to affect physiologically relevant cAMP
signaling events. In line with this idea, several studies have shown that overexpression of
dominant-negative PDE4s, constructs which encode catalytically inactive enzymes that act
by displacing endogenous PDEs from signaling complexes, elevate cAMP signals and PKA
activity in subcellular compartments controlled by anchored PDE4 [133-136]. Developing
this idea a step further, several groups mapped the interaction domains between PDE4s and
their scaffold proteins and developed disrupting peptides based on this information.
Treatment of cells with these peptides was shown to augment discrete pools of cAMP and
thereby exert specific biological functions via PDE4 displacement from signaling complexes
[109,137,138]. Although no therapeutic has been generated thus far, these studies
demonstrate, in proof of concept, that development of small molecule disruptors of PDE4
signaling complexes is a viable option for future drug development. The major limitation for
this approach is our current lack of understanding of the relevant molecular targets that
mediate the procognitive effects of PDE4 inhibitors.
4.5. Targeting drug delivery to the brain
To limit the side effects associated with systemic exposure to PDE4 inhibitors, the idea of a
local application of these drugs has been previously entertained for various inflammatory
diseases. These include inhalation for inflammatory lung diseases such as asthma and COPD
and topical application for skin diseases such as dermatitis or psoriasis. A similarly targeted,
local delivery of PDE4 inhibitors to the CNS might appear unrealistic at present, given that
delivery of drugs beyond the blood-brain-barrier per se can be challenging. However,
targeted drug delivery to the brain is a field of active investigation; major advances being
driven in particular by the need to deliver antineoplastic drugs to treat brain tumors yet limit
the systemic exposure to these cytotoxic compounds [139,140]. Advances in the delivery
options for these drugs, which generally aim to overcome or circumvent the blood-brain-
barrier, may eventually also benefit delivery of drugs for neurodegenerative and psychiatric
Richter et al. Page 13
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
diseases. These may include direct delivery to the brain via intranasal delivery or
intracerebral implants that release drugs over extended periods of time [140-144].
Alternatively, nano-sized carrier and delivery systems may facilitate transport of drugs past
the blood-brain-barrier and to their target cells while keeping the systemic exposure to
active/free compounds low [139-144]. In this context, an advantageous delivery system
could also be key for the successful development of a PDE4 inhibitor for cognition
enhancement.
5. Expert opinion
5.1. What are the key findings so far?
There is now a large array of preclinical studies attesting to the potent memory- and
cognition-enhancing as well as neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties of PAN-
PDE4 inhibitors (see Sections 2.2. and 2.3.). In fact, it can be argued that PDE4 inhibition is
the best-replicated cognitive enhancement in preclinical studies. These compounds are
effective in ameliorating or reversing pharmacologically or genetically induced impairments
in a broad range of animal models of human diseases, suggesting a therapeutic potential of
targeting PDE4s for a spectrum of CNS defects including Alzheimer’s disease and other
forms of dementia, as well as neuropsychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia and
depression. Indeed, the PAN-PDE4 inhibitor Rolipram often serves as a ‘standard’ in
preclinical studies against which other cognitive enhancers are compared.
5.2. What are the key weaknesses in this field?
Despite this significant body of preclinical research, there is no PDE4 inhibitor in clinical
use for the treatment of any cognitive disorder. To date, all of the PDE4 inhibitors examined
in clinical trials of cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders have been PAN-selective. These
compounds suffer from significant side effects, in particular emesis and nausea, which also
largely prevented their clinical application for non-CNS diseases.
5.3. What is the ultimate goal of PDE4 inhibitor development?
Given that PDE4s are widely expressed throughout the human body, systemic exposure to
PAN-selective PDE4 inhibitors is bound to affect cAMP signaling in many cells and tissues
and, therefore, produce a range of biological effects including those that are therapeutically
beneficial but also untoward side effects. Thus, the conceptually simple strategy to
overcome this hurdle is the development of inhibitors that selectively block only that portion
of total PDE4 activity that is therapeutically relevant to the particular disease being targeted
(see Sections 4.1.-4.5.). The practical steps to accomplish this goal involve identifying
PDE4-regulated signaling cascades underlying specific, disease-related cognitive
dysfunctions and then developing means of selectively targeting PDE4 inhibitors to these
disease-related pathways. Progress is being made in regards to both of these steps, despite
the considerable complexity.
5.4. What research or knowledge is needed to achieve this goal?
To date, progress towards identifying disease-relevant PDE4 signaling pathways has come
primarily from the study of mice deficient in individual PDE4 subtypes and the knock-down
Richter et al. Page 14
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
of individual PDE4 subtypes and splicing variants [34,65,66,105,106,121,122,132]. The four
genes that comprise the PDE4 family are expressed as more than 25 individual proteins [10].
Through the characterization of genetically modified mouse models, it is now well
established that individual PDE4s serve unique and non-redundant physiological and
pathological roles in the body. In fact, the literature reviewed here has begun to demonstrate
that targeting individual PDE4 subtypes and variants opens the opportunity to identify PDE4
targets that are therapeutically beneficial (see Sections 3.1. to 3.4.). It remains to be
determined whether identification of these targets will also yield compounds that lack the
side effects of non-selective PDE4 inhibitors. To date, only PDE4D subtype-selective
inhibitors have been available for clinical testing in airway inflammatory disorders such as
COPD [145]. Unfortunately, these compounds proved to be as emetic as PAN-PDE4
inhibitors and were not viable for therapeutic use for airway disorders [7,146]. It has not
been determined whether such compounds have procognitive effects in humans, as predicted
from the preclinical studies in PDE4D-KO mice reviewed here (see Section 3.4.). If such
were the case, it would still be critical to determine whether there may be a therapeutic index
for such effects relative to emesis and nausea.
5.5. Where do we see the field going in the coming years?
An increasingly diverse array of PDE4 inhibitors with unique pharmacology is becoming
available. These include compounds selective for individual PDE4 subtypes, in particular for
PDE4B or PDE4D, as well as compounds that may modulate activity by mechanisms that go
beyond simple competitive inhibition at the substrate binding site [31,36,127-131]. The
study of these compounds in preclinical models will undoubtedly shed new light on the roles
of different subtypes in mediating cognitive processes. Clinical evaluation of such
compounds, for use in cognitive disorders or other diseases, will also help clarify the role of
PDE4 isotypes in producing nausea and emesis in humans.
5.6. What areas of research are of particular interest?
PDE drug development efforts are increasingly benefiting from knowledge derived from the
atomic structures of these enzymes. This includes crystal structures encompassing areas of
the enzymes beyond the catalytic domains. Indeed, such data has already proven particularly
useful in elucidating the mechanism of subtype-selective inhibition for a novel class of
PDE4D-selective inhibitors [31]. More complete PDE structures are also beginning to reveal
mechanisms of allosteric regulation of catalytic activity by the N-terminal regulatory
domains [31]. Such knowledge may soon make it feasible to target the N-terminal domains
independently of the catalytic sites for the discovery of novel PDE allosteric modulators.
Another area of high interest for drug discovery is the identification of the mechanisms and
protein partners involved in the subcellular localization of PDE isoforms and the
significance of macromolecular protein complexes containing PDEs in regulating the spatial
dynamics of cyclic nucleotide signaling [19]. This knowledge offers the hope of identifying
new classes of compounds that can modulate PDE activity (and thereby cAMP levels)
within very discrete signaling domains such as via disruption of specific signaling
complexes. However, as disruption of protein-protein interactions has been diffciualt to
Richter et al. Page 15
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
achieve through traditional small molecule intervention, this avenue of research may require
new thinking in delivering relevant molecules to such drug targets.
5.7. What potential does this research hold?
Given the extensive body of preclinical literature indicating that PDE4 inhibition exerts
procognitive efficacy in a number of neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders,
PDE4 remains a target of high interest for CNS drug development. Research that reveals
means to better target specific PDE4 isoforms associated with disease-relevant signaling
pathways holds the promise of delivering a new generation of PDE4 inhibitors for the
treatment of various CNS diseases.
Bibliography
1. Buccafusco JJ. Emerging cognitive enhancing drugs. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2009; 14:577–89.
[PubMed: 19772371]
2. Plath N, Lerdrup L, Larsen PH, et al. Can small molecules provide truly effective enhancement of
cognition? Current achievements and future directions. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2011; 20:795–
811.
3. Blokland A, Menniti FS, Prickaerts J. PDE inhibition and cognition enhancement. Expert Opin Ther
Pat. 2012; 22:349–54. [PubMed: 22475506]
4. Blokland A, Schreiber R, Prickaerts J. Improving memory: a role for phosphodiesterases. Curr
Pharm Des. 2006; 12:2511–23. [PubMed: 16842174]
5. Ghavami A, Hirst WD, Novak TJ. Selective phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibitors: a novel approach
to treating memory deficit? Drugs R D. 2006; 7:63–71. [PubMed: 16542053]
6. Kleppisch T. Phosphodiesterases in the central nervous system. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009:71–92.
[PubMed: 19089326]
7. Menniti FS, Faraci WS, Schmidt CJ. Phosphodiesterases in the CNS: targets for drug development.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006; 5:660–70. [PubMed: 16883304] ** A comprehensive review on PDEs
as drug targets for CNS diseases.
8. Xu Y, Zhang HT, O’Donnell JM. Phosphodiesterases in the central nervous system: implications in
mood and cognitive disorders. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011:447–85. [PubMed: 21695652]
9. Conti M, Beavo J. Biochemistry and physiology of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: essential
components in cyclic nucleotide signaling. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007; 76:481–511. [PubMed:
17376027] ** A comprehensive review of the structure and function of the mammalian PDEs.
10. Conti M, Richter W, Mehats C, et al. Cyclic AMP-specific PDE4 phosphodiesterases as critical
components of cyclic AMP signaling. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278:5493–6. [PubMed: 12493749]
11. Rutten K, Prickaerts J, Hendrix M, et al. Time-dependent involvement of cAMP and cGMP in
consolidation of object memory: studies using selective phosphodiesterase type 2, 4 and 5
inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007; 558:107–12. [PubMed: 17207788]
12. Davis RL, Cherry J, Dauwalder B, et al. The cyclic AMP system and Drosophila learning. Mol
Cell Biochem. 1995; 149-150:271–8. [PubMed: 8569740]
13. Dudai Y, Jan YN, Byers D, et al. dunce, a mutant of Drosophila deficient in learning. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1976; 73:1684–8. [PubMed: 818641] ** An early report associating the dunce
gene, the fly ortholog of the mammalian PDE4s, with memory processes.
14. Kauvar LM. Defective cyclic adenosine 3′:5′-monophosphate phosphodiesterase in the Drosophila
memory mutant dunce. J Neurosci. 1982; 2:1347–58. [PubMed: 6288893]
15. Wachtel H. Characteristic behavioural alterations in rats induced by rolipram and other selective
adenosine cyclic 3′, 5′-monophosphate phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Psychopharmacology (Berl).
1982; 77:309–16. [PubMed: 6182575] ** First report of CNS effects of the prototypal PDE4
inhibitor Rolipram.
Richter et al. Page 16
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
16. Wachtel H. Potential antidepressant activity of rolipram and other selective cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-
monophosphate phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Neuropharmacology. 1983; 22:267–72. [PubMed:
6302550]
17. Zeller E, Stief HJ, Pflug B, et al. Results of a phase II study of the antidepressant effect of
rolipram. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1984; 17:188–90. [PubMed: 6393150]
18. Jin, SLC.; Richter, W.; Conti, M. Insights into the physiological functions of PDE4 from knockout
mice. In: Beavo, J.; Francis, S.; Houslay, M., editors. Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases in
Health and Disease. CRC Press; 2006. p. 323-346.
19. Houslay MD. Underpinning compartmentalised cAMP signalling through targeted cAMP
breakdown. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010; 35:91–100. [PubMed: 19864144]
20. Richter W, Conti M. Dimerization of the type 4 cAMP-specific phosphodiesterases is mediated by
the upstream conserved regions (UCRs). J Biol Chem. 2002; 277:40212–21. [PubMed: 12177055]
21. Richter W, Conti M. The oligomerization state determines regulatory properties and inhibitor
sensitivity of type 4 cAMP-specific phosphodiesterases. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279:30338–48.
[PubMed: 15131123]
22. MacKenzie SJ, Baillie GS, McPhee I, et al. Long PDE4 cAMP specific phosphodiesterases are
activated by protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of a single serine residue in Upstream
Conserved Region 1 (UCR1). Br J Pharmacol. 2002; 136:421–33. [PubMed: 12023945]
23. Sette C, Conti M. Phosphorylation and activation of a cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase by the
cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Involvement of serine 54 in the enzyme activation. J.Biol.Chem.
1996; 271:16526–16534. [PubMed: 8663227]
24. Bruss MD, Richter W, Horner K, et al. Critical role of PDE4D in beta2-adrenoceptor-dependent
cAMP signaling in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283:22430–42. [PubMed:
18508768]
25. Sette C, Iona S, Conti M. The short-term activation of a rolipram-sensitive, cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase by thyroid-stimulating hormone in thyroid FRTL- 5 cells is mediated by a
cAMP-dependent phosphorylation. J Biol.Chem. 1994; 269:9245–9252. [PubMed: 8132662]
26. Grange M, Sette C, Cuomo M, et al. The cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE4D3 is regulated
by phosphatidic acid binding. Consequences for cAMP signaling pathway and characterization of
a phosphatidic acid binding site. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275:33379–87. [PubMed: 10938092]
27. Grange M, Sette C, Prigent AF, et al. Regulation of cAMP-phosphodiesterases by phosphatidic
acid binding. Lipids. 1999; 34(Suppl):S83. [PubMed: 10419099]
28. Baillie GS, MacKenzie SJ, McPhee I, et al. Sub-family selective actions in the ability of Erk2
MAP kinase to phosphorylate and regulate the activity of PDE4 cyclic AMP-specific
phosphodiesterases. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 131:811–9. [PubMed: 11030732]
29. Hoffmann R, Baillie GS, MacKenzie SJ, et al. The MAP kinase ERK2 inhibits the cyclic AMP-
specific phosphodiesterase HSPDE4D3 by phosphorylating it at Ser579. Embo J. 1999; 18:893–
903. [PubMed: 10022832]
30. Barad M, Bourtchouladze R, Winder DG, et al. Rolipram, a type IV-specific phosphodiesterase
inhibitor, facilitates the establishment of long-lasting long-term potentiation and improves
memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95:15020–5. [PubMed: 9844008] * Demonstration that
PDE4 inhibition facilitates LTP and improves memory.
31. Burgin AB, Magnusson OT, Singh J, et al. Design of phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D) allosteric
modulators for enhancing cognition with improved safety. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28:63–70.
[PubMed: 20037581] ** This paper suggests that therapeutic and side-effects of PDE4D inhibition
can be dissociated.
32. Gallant M, Aspiotis R, Day S, et al. Discovery of MK-0952, a selective PDE4 inhibitor for the
treatment of long-term memory loss and mild cognitive impairment. Bioorg Med Chem Lett.
2010; 20:6387–93. [PubMed: 20933411]
33. Huang Z, Dias R, Jones T, et al. L-454,560, a potent and selective PDE4 inhibitor with in vivo
efficacy in animal models of asthma and cognition. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007; 73:1971–81.
[PubMed: 17428447]
Richter et al. Page 17
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
34. Li YF, Cheng YF, Huang Y, et al. Phosphodiesterase-4D knock-out and RNA interference-
mediated knock-down enhance memory and increase hippocampal neurogenesis via increased
cAMP signaling. J Neurosci. 2011; 31:172–83. [PubMed: 21209202]
35. Rutten K, Basile JL, Prickaerts J, et al. Selective PDE inhibitors rolipram and sildenafil improve
object retrieval performance in adult cynomolgus macaques. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008;
196:643–8. [PubMed: 18034336] * Confirmation that PDE4 inhibition improves memory also in
monkeys.
36. Bruno O, Fedele E, Prickaerts J, et al. GEBR-7b, a novel PDE4D selective inhibitor that improves
memory in rodents at non-emetic doses. Br J Pharmacol. 2011; 164:2054–63. [PubMed:
21649644]
37. Egawa T, Mishima K, Matsumoto Y, et al. Rolipram and its optical isomers, phosphodiesterase 4
inhibitors, attenuated the scopolamine-induced impairments of learning and memory in rats. Jpn J
Pharmacol. 1997; 75:275–81. [PubMed: 9434259]
38. Imanishi T, Sawa A, Ichimaru Y, et al. Ameliorating effects of rolipram on experimentally induced
impairments of learning and memory in rodents. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997; 321:273–8. [PubMed:
9085037]
39. Zhang HT, Huang Y, Suvarna NU, et al. Effects of the novel PDE4 inhibitors MEM1018 and
MEM1091 on memory in the radial-arm maze and inhibitory avoidance tests in rats.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005; 179:613–9. [PubMed: 15672274]
40. Zhang HT, O’Donnell JM. Effects of rolipram on scopolamine-induced impairment of working and
reference memory in the radial-arm maze tests in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000;
150:311–6. [PubMed: 10923759]
41. Zhang HT, Crissman AM, Dorairaj NR, et al. Inhibition of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase (PDE4)
reverses memory deficits associated with NMDA receptor antagonism.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000; 23:198–204. [PubMed: 10882846]
42. Davis JA, Gould TJ. Rolipram attenuates MK-801-induced deficits in latent inhibition. Behav
Neurosci. 2005; 119:595–602. [PubMed: 15839805]
43. Zhang HT, Zhao Y, Huang Y, et al. Inhibition of the phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) enzyme reverses
memory deficits produced by infusion of the MEK inhibitor U0126 into the CA1 subregion of the
rat hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004; 29:1432–9. [PubMed: 15114341]
44. Rutten K, Lieben C, Smits L, et al. The PDE4 inhibitor rolipram reverses object memory
impairment induced by acute tryptophan depletion in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007;
192:275–82. [PubMed: 17265077]
45. Li LX, Cheng YF, Lin HB, et al. Prevention of cerebral ischemia-induced memory deficits by
inhibition of phosphodiesterase-4 in rats. Metab Brain Dis. 2011; 26:37–47. [PubMed: 21327879]
46. de Lima MN, Presti-Torres J, Garcia VA, et al. Amelioration of recognition memory impairment
associated with iron loading or aging by the type 4-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram
in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2008; 55:788–92. [PubMed: 18619476]
47. Ramos BP, Birnbaum SG, Lindenmayer I, et al. Dysregulation of protein kinase a signaling in the
aged prefrontal cortex: new strategy for treating age-related cognitive decline. Neuron. 2003;
40:835–45. [PubMed: 14622586]
48. Bourtchouladze R, Lidge R, Catapano R, et al. A mouse model of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome:
defective long-term memory is ameliorated by inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 4. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 2003; 100:10518–22. [PubMed: 12930888]
49. Vitolo OV, Sant’Angelo A, Costanzo V, et al. Amyloid beta -peptide inhibition of the PKA/CREB
pathway and long-term potentiation: reversibility by drugs that enhance cAMP signaling. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99:13217–21. [PubMed: 12244210] * PDE4 inhibition reverses β-
amyloid-induced inhibition of PKA/CREB signaling and LTP.
50. Gong B, Vitolo OV, Trinchese F, et al. Persistent improvement in synaptic and cognitive functions
in an Alzheimer mouse model after rolipram treatment. J Clin Invest. 2004; 114:1624–34.
[PubMed: 15578094] ** PDE4 inhibitors are effective in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s.
51. Cheng YF, Wang C, Lin HB, et al. Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-4 reverses memory deficits
produced by Abeta25-35 or Abeta1-40 peptide in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010;
212:181–91. [PubMed: 20640406]
Richter et al. Page 18
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
52. Wang C, Yang XM, Zhuo YY, et al. The phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor rolipram reverses Abeta-
induced cognitive impairment and neuroinflammatory and apoptotic responses in rats. Int J
Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012; 15:749–66. [PubMed: 21733236]
53. Sharma V, Bala A, Deshmukh R, et al. Neuroprotective effect of RO-20-1724-a
phosphodiesterase4 inhibitor against intracerebroventricular streptozotocin induced cognitive
deficit and oxidative stress in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012; 101:239–45. [PubMed:
22285388]
54. Li YF, Huang Y, Amsdell SL, et al. Antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects of the
phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor rolipram on behavior depend on cyclic AMP response element
binding protein-mediated neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;
34:2404–19. [PubMed: 19516250]
55. Nakagawa S, Kim JE, Lee R, et al. Regulation of neurogenesis in adult mouse hippocampus by
cAMP and the cAMP response element-binding protein. J Neurosci. 2002; 22:3673–82. [PubMed:
11978843]
56. Rutten K, Prickaerts J, Blokland A. Rolipram reverses scopolamine-induced and time-dependent
memory deficits in object recognition by different mechanisms of action. Neurobiol Learn Mem.
2006; 85:132–8. [PubMed: 16242977]
57. Navakkode S, Sajikumar S, Frey JU. The type IV-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram
and its effect on hippocampal long-term potentiation and synaptic tagging. J Neurosci. 2004;
24:7740–4. [PubMed: 15342741]
58. Wiescholleck V, Manahan-Vaughan D. PDE4 inhibition enhances hippocampal synaptic plasticity
in vivo and rescues MK801-induced impairment of long-term potentiation and object recognition
memory in an animal model of psychosis. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2:e89. [PubMed: 22832854]
59. Giorgi M, Modica A, Pompili A, et al. The induction of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 4 gene
(PDE4D) impairs memory in a water maze task. Behav Brain Res. 2004; 154:99–106. [PubMed:
15302115]
60. Yamashita N, Hayashi A, Baba J, et al. Rolipram, a phosphodiesterase-4-selective inhibitor,
promotes the survival of cultured rat dopaminergic neurons. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1997; 75:155–9.
[PubMed: 9414030] * An early report suggesting neuroprotective effects of PDE4 inhibitors.
61. Schaal SM, Garg MS, Ghosh M, et al. The therapeutic profile of rolipram, PDE target and
mechanism of action as a neuroprotectant following spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2012;
7:e43634. [PubMed: 23028463]
62. Sebastiani G, Morissette C, Lagace C, et al. The cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4B mediates
Abeta-induced microglial activation. Neurobiol Aging. 2006; 27:691–701. [PubMed: 15993984]
63. Nikulina E, Tidwell JL, Dai HN, et al. The phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram delivered after a
spinal cord lesion promotes axonal regeneration and functional recovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A. 2004; 101:8786–90. [PubMed: 15173585]
64. Giralt A, Saavedra A, Carreton O, et al. Increased PKA signaling disrupts recognition memory and
spatial memory: role in Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2011; 20:4232–47. [PubMed:
21835884]
65. Rutten K, Misner DL, Works M, et al. Enhanced long-term potentiation and impaired learning in
phosphodiesterase 4D-knockout (PDE4D) mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2008; 28:625–32. [PubMed:
18702734]
66. Rutten K, Wallace TL, Works M, et al. Enhanced long-term depression and impaired reversal
learning in phosphodiesterase 4B-knockout (PDE4B-/-) mice. Neuropharmacology. 2011; 61:138–
47. [PubMed: 21458469]
67. Arnsten AF, Ramos BP, Birnbaum SG, et al. Protein kinase A as a therapeutic target for memory
disorders: rationale and challenges. Trends Mol Med. 2005; 11:121–8. [PubMed: 15760770]
68. Hotte M, Dauphin F, Freret T, et al. A biphasic and brain-region selective down-regulation of
cyclic adenosine monophosphate concentrations supports object recognition in the rat. PLoS One.
2012; 7:e32244. [PubMed: 22359674]
69. DeMarch Z, Giampa C, Patassini S, et al. Beneficial effects of rolipram in the R6/2 mouse model
of Huntington’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2008; 30:375–87. [PubMed: 18424161]
Richter et al. Page 19
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
70. DeMarch Z, Giampa C, Patassini S, et al. Beneficial effects of rolipram in a quinolinic acid model
of striatal excitotoxicity. Neurobiol Dis. 2007; 25:266–73. [PubMed: 17184995]
71. Heaslip RJ, Evans DY. Emetic, central nervous system, and pulmonary activities of rolipram in the
dog. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995; 286:281–90. [PubMed: 8608790]
72. Hebenstreit GF, Fellerer K, Fichte K, et al. Rolipram in major depressive disorder: results of a
double-blind comparative study with imipramine. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1989; 22:156–60.
[PubMed: 2668980]
73. Cherry JA, Davis RL. Cyclic AMP phosphodiesterases are localized in regions of the mouse brain
associated with reinforcement, movement, and affect. J Comp Neurol. 1999; 407:287–301.
[PubMed: 10213096]
74. Lamontagne S, Meadows E, Luk P, et al. Localization of phosphodiesterase-4 isoforms in the
medulla and nodose ganglion of the squirrel monkey. Brain Res. 2001; 920:84–96. [PubMed:
11716814]
75. Mori F, Perez-Torres S, De Caro R, et al. The human area postrema and other nuclei related to the
emetic reflex express cAMP phosphodiesterases 4B and 4D. J Chem Neuroanat. 2010; 40:36–42.
[PubMed: 20347962]
76. Lehnart SE, Wehrens XH, Reiken S, et al. Phosphodiesterase 4D deficiency in the ryanodine-
receptor complex promotes heart failure and arrhythmias. Cell. 2005; 123:25–35. [PubMed:
16213210]
77. Leroy J, Richter W, Mika D, et al. Phosphodiesterase 4B in the cardiac L-type Ca(2)(+) channel
complex regulates Ca(2)(+) current and protects against ventricular arrhythmias in mice. J Clin
Invest. 2011; 121:2651–61. [PubMed: 21670503]
78. Molina CE, Leroy J, Richter W, et al. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase type 4
protects against atrial arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59:2182–90. [PubMed: 22676938]
79. Gretarsdottir S, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir ST, et al. The gene encoding phosphodiesterase 4D
confers risk of ischemic stroke. Nat Genet. 2003; 35:131–8. [PubMed: 14517540]
80. Losco PE, Evans EW, Barat SA, et al. The toxicity of SCH 351591, a novel phosphodiesterase-4
inhibitor, in Cynomolgus monkeys. Toxicol Pathol. 2004; 32:295–308. [PubMed: 15204971]
81. Calverley PM, Rabe KF, Goehring UM, et al. Roflumilast in symptomatic chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease: two randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2009; 374:685–94. [PubMed:
19716960] ** Report of a clinical trial that resulted in the first FDA-approval of a PDE4 inhibitor,
Roflumilast, for any indication.
82. Fabbri LM, Calverley PM, Izquierdo-Alonso JL, et al. Roflumilast in moderate-to-severe chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease treated with longacting bronchodilators: two randomised clinical
trials. Lancet. 2009; 374:695–703. [PubMed: 19716961]
83. Iona S, Cuomo M, Bushnik T, et al. Characterization of the rolipram-sensitive, cyclic AMP-
specific phosphodiesterases: identification and differential expression of immunologically distinct
forms in the rat brain. Mol Pharmacol. 1998; 53:23–32. [PubMed: 9443929]
84. Johansson EM, Reyes-Irisarri E, Mengod G. Comparison of cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase
mRNAs distribution in mouse and rat brain. Neurosci Lett. 2012; 525:1–6. [PubMed: 22884617]
85. Perez-Torres S, Miro X, Palacios JM, et al. Phosphodiesterase type 4 isozymes expression in
human brain examined by in situ hybridization histochemistry and[3H]rolipram binding
autoradiography. Comparison with monkey and rat brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2000; 20:349–74.
[PubMed: 11207431]
86. Lobban M, Shakur Y, Beattie J, et al. Identification of two splice variant forms of type-IVB cyclic
AMP phosphodiesterase, DPD (rPDE-IVB1) and PDE-4 (rPDEIVB2) in brain: selective
localization in membrane and cytosolic compartments and differential expression in various brain
regions. Biochem J. 1994; 304(Pt 2):399–406. [PubMed: 7998974]
87. McPhee I, Cochran S, Houslay MD. The novel long PDE4A10 cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase
shows a pattern of expression within brain that is distinct from the long PDE4A5 and short
PDE4A1 isoforms. Cell Signal. 2001; 13:911–8. [PubMed: 11728831]
88. McPhee I, Pooley L, Lobban M, et al. Identification, characterization and regional distribution in
brain of RPDE-6 (RNPDE4A5), a novel splice variant of the PDE4A cyclic AMP
phosphodiesterase family. Biochem J. 1995; 310(Pt 3):965–74. [PubMed: 7575434]
Richter et al. Page 20
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
89. Miro X, Perez-Torres S, Puigdomenech P, et al. Differential distribution of PDE4D splice variant
mRNAs in rat brain suggests association with specific pathways and presynaptical localization.
Synapse. 2002; 45:259–69. [PubMed: 12125047]
90. Reyes-Irisarri E, Perez-Torres S, Miro X, et al. Differential distribution of PDE4B splice variant
mRNAs in rat brain and the effects of systemic administration of LPS in their expression. Synapse.
2008; 62:74–9. [PubMed: 17960764]
91. Richter W, Jin SL, Conti M. Splice variants of the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase PDE4D are
differentially expressed and regulated in rat tissue. Biochem J. 2005; 388:803–11. [PubMed:
15717866]
92. Hansen G, Jin S, Umetsu DT, et al. Absence of muscarinic cholinergic airway responses in mice
deficient in the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase PDE4D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;
97:6751–6. [PubMed: 10841571]
93. Jin SL, Goya S, Nakae S, et al. Phosphodiesterase 4B is essential for T(H)2-cell function and
development of airway hyperresponsiveness in allergic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;
126:1252–9. e12. [PubMed: 21047676]
94. Mehats C, Jin SL, Wahlstrom J, et al. PDE4D plays a critical role in the control of airway smooth
muscle contraction. FASEB J. 2003; 17:1831–41. [PubMed: 14519662]
95. Jin SL, Conti M. Induction of the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase PDE4B is essential for LPS-
activated TNF-alpha responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99:7628–33. [PubMed:
12032334]
96. Mackenzie KF, Topping EC, Bugaj-Gaweda B, et al. Human PDE4A8, a novel brain-expressed
PDE4 cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase that has undergone rapid evolutionary change. Biochem
J. 2008; 411:361–9. [PubMed: 18095939]
97. Braun NN, Reutiman TJ, Lee S, et al. Expression of phosphodiesterase 4 is altered in the brains of
subjects with autism. Neuroreport. 2007; 18:1841–4. [PubMed: 18090323]
98. Fatemi SH, Reutiman TJ, Folsom TD, et al. Phosphodiesterase-4A expression is reduced in
cerebella of patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 2008; 18:282–8. [PubMed: 19018233]
99. Vecsey CG, Baillie GS, Jaganath D, et al. Sleep deprivation impairs cAMP signalling in the
hippocampus. Nature. 2009; 461:1122–5. [PubMed: 19847264]
100. Hajjhussein H, Suvarna NU, Gremillion C, et al. Changes in NMDA receptor-induced cyclic
nucleotide synthesis regulate the age-dependent increase in PDE4A expression in primary
cortical cultures. Brain Res. 2007; 1149:58–68. [PubMed: 17407767]
101. Ahmed T, Frey JU. Expression of the specific type IV phosphodiesterase gene PDE4B3 during
different phases of long-term potentiation in single hippocampal slices of rats in vitro.
Neuroscience. 2003; 117:627–38. [PubMed: 12617967]
102. Ahmed T, Frey JU. Phosphodiesterase 4B (PDE4B) and cAMP-level regulation within different
tissue fractions of rat hippocampal slices during long-term potentiation in vitro. Brain Res. 2005;
1041:212–22. [PubMed: 15829230]
103. Ahmed T, Frey S, Frey JU. Regulation of the phosphodiesterase PDE4B3-isotype during long-
term potentiation in the area dentata in vivo. Neuroscience. 2004; 124:857–67. [PubMed:
15026126]
104. Navakkode S, Sajikumar S, Frey JU. Mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated reinforcement of
hippocampal early long-term depression by the type IV-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor
rolipram and its effect on synaptic tagging. J Neurosci. 2005; 25:10664–70. [PubMed: 16291939]
105. Siuciak JA, McCarthy SA, Chapin DS, et al. Behavioral and neurochemical characterization of
mice deficient in the phosphodiesterase-4B (PDE4B) enzyme. Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2008; 197:115–26. [PubMed: 18060387]
106. Zhang HT, Huang Y, Masood A, et al. Anxiogenic-like behavioral phenotype of mice deficient in
phosphodiesterase 4B (PDE4B). Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008; 33:1611–23. [PubMed:
17700644]
107. Rubio-Perez JM, Morillas-Ruiz JM. A review: inflammatory process in Alzheimer’s disease, role
of cytokines. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012; 2012:756357. [PubMed: 22566778]
Richter et al. Page 21
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
108. Millar JK, Pickard BS, Mackie S, et al. DISC1 and PDE4B are interacting genetic factors in
schizophrenia that regulate cAMP signaling. Science. 2005; 310:1187–91. [PubMed: 16293762]
* First association of PDE4B with schizophrenia.
109. Murdoch H, Mackie S, Collins DM, et al. Isoform-selective susceptibility of DISC1/
phosphodiesterase-4 complexes to dissociation by elevated intracellular cAMP levels. J Neurosci.
2007; 27:9513–24. [PubMed: 17728464]
110. Fatemi SH, King DP, Reutiman TJ, et al. PDE4B polymorphisms and decreased PDE4B
expression are associated with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008; 101:36–49. [PubMed:
18394866]
111. Numata S, Ueno S, Iga J, et al. Positive association of the PDE4B (phosphodiesterase 4B) gene
with schizophrenia in the Japanese population. J Psychiatr Res. 2008; 43:7–12. [PubMed:
18329668]
112. Pickard BS, Thomson PA, Christoforou A, et al. The PDE4B gene confers sex-specific protection
against schizophrenia. Psychiatr Genet. 2007; 17:129–33. [PubMed: 17417055]
113. Tomppo L, Hennah W, Lahermo P, et al. Association between genes of Disrupted in
schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) interactors and schizophrenia supports the role of the DISC1 pathway
in the etiology of major mental illnesses. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 65:1055–62. [PubMed:
19251251]
114. Kahler AK, Otnaess MK, Wirgenes KV, et al. Association study of PDE4B gene variants in
Scandinavian schizophrenia and bipolar disorder multicenter case-control samples. Am J Med
Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2010; 153B:86–96. [PubMed: 19350560]
115. Rastogi A, Zai C, Likhodi O, et al. Genetic association and post-mortem brain mRNA analysis of
DISC1 and related genes in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2009; 114:39–49. [PubMed:
19632097]
116. Fadda F, Rossetti ZL. Chronic ethanol consumption: from neuroadaptation to neurodegeneration.
Prog Neurobiol. 1998; 56:385–431. [PubMed: 9775400]
117. Hu W, Lu T, Chen A, et al. Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-4 decreases ethanol intake in mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011; 218:331–9. [PubMed: 21509503]
118. Wen RT, Zhang M, Qin WJ, et al. The phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor rolipram decreases
ethanol seeking and consumption in alcohol-preferring fawn-hooded rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2012; 36:2157–67. [PubMed: 22671516]
119. Robbins TW, Ersche KD, Everitt BJ. Drug addiction and the memory systems of the brain. Ann N
Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1141:1–21. [PubMed: 18991949]
120. Wang ZZ, Zhang Y, Liu YQ, et al. RNA interference-mediated phosphodiesterase 4D splice
variants knock-down in the prefrontal cortex produces antidepressant-like and cognition-
enhancing effects. Br J Pharmacol. 2013; 168:1001–14. [PubMed: 23003922]
121. Schaefer TL, Braun AA, Amos-Kroohs RM, et al. A new model of Pde4d deficiency: genetic
knock-down of PDE4D enzyme in rats produces an antidepressant phenotype without spatial
cognitive effects. Genes Brain Behav. 2012; 11:614–22. [PubMed: 22487514]
122. Zhang HT, Huang Y, Jin SL, et al. Antidepressant-like profile and reduced sensitivity to rolipram
in mice deficient in the PDE4D phosphodiesterase enzyme. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;
27:587–95. [PubMed: 12377395] ** A first report elucidating the role of individual PDE4
subtypes in the brain.
123. Duplantier AJ, Biggers MS, Chambers RJ, et al. Biarylcarboxylic acids and -amides: inhibition of
phosphodiesterase type IV versus [3H]rolipram binding activity and their relationship to emetic
behavior in the ferret. J Med Chem. 1996; 39:120–5. [PubMed: 8568798]
124. Souness JE, Rao S. Proposal for pharmacologically distinct conformers of PDE4 cyclic AMP
phosphodiesterases. Cell Signal. 1997; 9:227–36. [PubMed: 9218122]
125. Zhang HT, Zhao Y, Huang Y, et al. Antidepressant-like effects of PDE4 inhibitors mediated by
the high-affinity rolipram binding state (HARBS) of the phosphodiesterase-4 enzyme (PDE4) in
rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006; 186:209–17. [PubMed: 16586089]
126. Jin S-LC, Richard F, Kuo W-P, et al. Impaired growth and fertility of cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase PDE4D-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96 In press.
Richter et al. Page 22
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
127. Donnell AF, Dollings PJ, Butera JA, et al. Identification of pyridazino[4,5-b]indolizines as
selective PDE4B inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010; 20:2163–7. [PubMed: 20202838]
128. Kranz M, Wall M, Evans B, et al. Identification of PDE4B Over 4D subtype-selective inhibitors
revealing an unprecedented binding mode. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009; 17:5336–41. [PubMed:
19525117]
129. Mitchell CJ, Ballantine SP, Coe DM, et al. Pyrazolopyridines as potent PDE4B inhibitors: 5-
heterocycle SAR. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010; 20:5803–6. [PubMed: 20732811]
130. Naganuma K, Omura A, Maekawara N, et al. Discovery of selective PDE4B inhibitors. Bioorg
Med Chem Lett. 2009; 19:3174–6. [PubMed: 19447034]
131. Aspiotis R, Deschenes D, Dube D, et al. The discovery and synthesis of highly potent subtype
selective phosphodiesterase 4D inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010; 20:5502–5. [PubMed:
20709547]
132. Robichaud A, Stamatiou PB, Jin SL, et al. Deletion of phosphodiesterase 4D in mice shortens
alpha(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated anesthesia, a behavioral correlate of emesis. J Clin Invest. 2002;
110:1045–52. [PubMed: 12370283] ** Report suggesting that inactivation of PDE4D, but not
PDE4B, induces a correlate of emesis in the mouse.
133. Baillie GS, Sood A, McPhee I, et al. beta-Arrestin-mediated PDE4 cAMP phosphodiesterase
recruitment regulates beta-adrenoceptor switching from Gs to Gi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2003; 100:940–5. [PubMed: 12552097]
134. De Arcangelis V, Liu R, Soto D, et al. Differential association of phosphodiesterase 4D isoforms
with beta2-adrenoceptor in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284:33824–32. [PubMed:
19801680]
135. McCahill A, McSorley T, Huston E, et al. In resting COS1 cells a dominant negative approach
shows that specific, anchored PDE4 cAMP phosphodiesterase isoforms gate the activation, by
basal cyclic AMP production, of AKAP-tethered protein kinase A type II located in the
centrosomal region. Cell Signal. 2005; 17:1158–73. [PubMed: 15905070]
136. Richter W, Day P, Agrawal R, et al. Signaling from beta1- and beta2-adrenergic receptors is
defined by differential interactions with PDE4. EMBO J. 2008; 27:384–93. [PubMed: 18188154]
137. Bolger GB, Baillie GS, Li X, et al. Scanning peptide array analyses identify overlapping binding
sites for the signalling scaffold proteins, beta-arrestin and RACK1, in cAMP-specific
phosphodiesterase PDE4D5. Biochem J. 2006; 398:23–36. [PubMed: 16689683]
138. Murdoch H, Vadrevu S, Prinz A, et al. Interaction between LIS1 and PDE4, and its role in
cytoplasmic dynein function. J Cell Sci. 2011; 124:2253–66. [PubMed: 21652625]
139. Beduneau A, Saulnier P, Benoit JP. Active targeting of brain tumors using nanocarriers.
Biomaterials. 2007; 28:4947–67. [PubMed: 17716726]
140. Patel MM, Goyal BR, Bhadada SV, et al. Getting into the brain: approaches to enhance brain drug
delivery. CNS Drugs. 2009; 23:35–58. [PubMed: 19062774]
141. Alam MI, Beg S, Samad A, et al. Strategy for effective brain drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci.
2010; 40:385–403. [PubMed: 20497904]
142. Joshi S, Ornstein E, Bruce JN. Targeting the brain: rationalizing the novel methods of drug
delivery to the central nervous system. Neurocrit Care. 2007; 6:200–12. [PubMed: 17572864]
143. Pasha S, Gupta K. Various drug delivery approaches to the central nervous system. Expert Opin
Drug Deliv. 2010; 7:113–35. [PubMed: 20017662]
144. Potschka H. Targeting the brain--surmounting or bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Handb Exp
Pharmacol. 2010; 411:31.
145. Kalgutkar AS, Choo E, Taylor TJ, et al. Disposition of CP-671, 305, a selective
phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor in preclinical species. Xenobiotica. 2004; 34:755–70. [PubMed:
15690763]
146. Yeadon, M.; Clarke, N.; Ward, J. Phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) inhibition: The search for
effective therapy with minimal side effects. In: HTaB, JP., editor. New Drugs and Targets for
Asthma and COPD. Prog Respir Res. Karger; Basel: 2010. p. 269-278.
147. Gekel I, Neher E. Application of an Epac activator enhances neurotransmitter release at excitatory
central synapses. J Neurosci. 2008; 28:7991–8002. [PubMed: 18685024]
Richter et al. Page 23
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
148. Gelinas JN, Banko JL, Peters MM, et al. Activation of exchange protein activated by cyclic-AMP
enhances long-lasting synaptic potentiation in the hippocampus. Learn Mem. 2008; 15:403–11.
[PubMed: 18509114]
149. Laurent AC, Breckler M, Berthouze M, et al. Role of Epac in brain and heart. Biochem Soc
Trans. 2012; 40:51–7. [PubMed: 22260665]
150. Ma N, Abel T, Hernandez PJ. Exchange protein activated by cAMP enhances long-term memory
formation independent of protein kinase A. Learn Mem. 2009; 16:367–70. [PubMed: 19470652]
151. Mironov SL, Skorova EY. Stimulation of bursting in pre-Botzinger neurons by Epac through
calcium release and modulation of TRPM4 and K-ATP channels. J Neurochem. 2011; 117:295–
308. [PubMed: 21281309]
152. Ostroveanu A, van der Zee EA, Eisel UL, et al. Exchange protein activated by cyclic AMP 2
(Epac2) plays a specific and time-limited role in memory retrieval. Hippocampus. 2010;
20:1018–26. [PubMed: 19739231]
153. Peace AG, Shewan DA. New perspectives in cyclic AMP-mediated axon growth and guidance:
The emerging epoch of Epac. Brain Res Bull. 2011; 84:280–8. [PubMed: 20851749]
154. Ster J, De Bock F, Guerineau NC, et al. Exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac) mediates
cAMP activation of p38 MAPK and modulation of Ca2+-dependent K+ channels in cerebellar
neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:2519–24. [PubMed: 17284589]
155. Benarroch EE. HCN channels: function and clinical implications. Neurology. 2013; 80:304–10.
[PubMed: 23319474]
156. Craven KB, Zagotta WN. CNG and HCN channels: two peas, one pod. Annu Rev Physiol. 2006;
68:375–401. [PubMed: 16460277]
Richter et al. Page 24
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Article highlights box
1. The PDE4 family comprises four genes, PDE4A to D, which together are
expressed as more than 25 splicing variants that each exert unique and non-
redundant physiological functions.
2. PAN-PDE4 inhibitors exert memory- and cognition-enhancing as well as
neuroprotective, neuroregenerative and anti-inflammatory effects in preclinical
models.
3. Inactivation of PDE4D replicates a significant number of the behavioral
phenotypes that define the memory- and cognition-enhancing properties of
PDE4 inhibitors, identifying PDE4D as a promising target for memory- and
cognition-enhancing drugs.
4. Emesis and nausea are dose-limiting side effects of PAN-PDE4 inhibitors.
5. Targeting subpopulations of PDE4 activity, such as individual PDE4 subtypes,
splice variants or conformational states, promises drugs/inhibitors with reduced
side effects and a wider therapeutic window.
Richter et al. Page 25
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 1. Members, domain organization and regulatory properties of the PDE4 family
The PDE4 family comprises four genes, PDE4A-D, and each is expressed as multiple
variants. At least six PDE4A variants (PDE4A1, PDE4A4/5, PDE4A7, PDE4A8, PDE4A10
and PDE4A11), five PDE4B variants (PDE4B1-5), three PDE4C variants (PDE4C1-3), and
eleven PDE4D variants (PDE4D1-11) have been reported. Shown is the domain
organization of the eleven variants generated from the PDE4D gene. Domains are depicted
as ‘barrels’ connected by ‘wires’ indicating linker regions. Domains functioning as targeting
sequences by mediating protein/protein interactions are indicated as red striated barrels.
These are generally encoded by variant-specific first exons. Phosphorylation sites for protein
kinase A (PKA) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) are depicted as cyan
circles. Long and short PDE4 variants are distinguished by the complete or partial presence
of the UCR1/2 module. The regions of the UCR domains that mediate dimerization of PDE4
long forms are indicated by a blue rectangle.
Richter et al. Page 26
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 2. PDE4 inhibition, cAMP signaling and brain function
Scheme illustrating the signaling events linking PDE4 inhibition to improved brain function.
Inhibition of PDE4 triggers an increase in cAMP which in turn exerts its downstream effects
via activation of protein kinase A (PKA), exchange proteins activated by cAMP (EPACs)
and cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) and hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-
modulated (HCN) channels. PKA is well known to phosphorylate a range of signaling
proteins including CREB (cAMP response element binding protein), synapsin, DARPP32
(dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of Mr 32 kDa) and tyrosine hydroxylase
(TH) and thereby modulate gene expression, ion channel function, neurotransmitter
synthesis and release as well as various other signaling events that regulate memory and
cognitive processes. Recent evidence suggests that EPAC is involved in many of the same
signaling paradigms previously associated with PKA, suggesting that some of the
established effects of PDE4 inhibitors on memory and cognition might be mediated by
EPAC rather than PKA activation [147-154]. Although a role for cyclic nucleotide-regulated
channels (CNG and HCN) in brain function is well established [155,156], little is known
thus far about the role of PDEs in regulating the pool of cAMP that controls the function of
these channels. NT, neurotransmitter; AC, adenylyl cyclase; GsPCR, Gs protein-coupled
receptor; GiPCR, Gi protein-coupled receptor; βAR, β-adrenergic receptor; αAR, α-
adrenergic receptor; DR, dopamine receptor; 5HTR, serotonin type 1D receptor
Richter et al. Page 27
Expert Opin Ther Targets. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
