ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The aerodynamics of golf balls is considerably more complex than that of many other spherical balls. The surface roughness in the form of dimples intensifies the level of complexity and three-dimensionality of air flow around the golf ball. Prior studies have revealed that golf ball aerodynamics is still not fully understood due to the varied dimple size, shape, depth and pattern. The current study experimentally measured drag coefficients of a range of commercially available golf balls, under a range of wind speeds. It was found that the drag coefficients of these balls varied significantly due to varied dimple geometry.
Content may be subject to copyright.
vailable online at
Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology (APCST)
A study of golf ball aerodynamic drag
Firoz Alam
, Tom Steiner, Harun Chowdhury, Hazim Moria, Iftekhar Khan,
Fayez Aldawi, Aleksandar Subic
School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia
Received 8 April 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 16 May 2011
The aerodynamics of golf balls is considerably more complex than that of many other spherical balls. The surface
roughness in the form of dimples intensifies the level of complexity and three-dimensionality of air flow around the
golf ball. Prior studies have revealed that golf ball aerodynamics is still not fully understood due to the varied dimple
size, shape, depth and pattern. The current study experimentally measured drag coefficients of a range of
commercially available golf balls, under a range of wind speeds. It was found that the drag coefficients of these balls
varied significantly due to varied dimple geometry.
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of RMIT University
Keywords: Aerodynamics; golfball; wind tunnel; drag coefficient
1. Introduction
The player’s performance can significantly be enhanced if the aerodynamic behavior of the golf ball is
understood and the potential benefit exploited intelligently. A wide variety of commercially manufactured
golf balls are available to suit individual golfer’s style of play. Of particular relevance to this work is the
variation in dimple geometry. The flight trajectory is influenced by the aerodynamic forces exerted on the
ball, which are significantly dependent on the physical features of the dimples. Most commercially
manufactured golf balls have between 250 and 500 dimples, however these dimples vary in size, shape
and depth. Golf ball manufacturers often claim superior aerodynamic performance of their balls, however
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +61-3-9925-6103; fax: +61-3-9926-6108.
E-mail address:
1877–7058 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 226–231
Firoz Alam et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 226–231
there is an absence of detailed aerodynamic data available in the public domain. This hampers
verification of claims, and also intelligent selection of balls by players.
A golf ball usually moves at a speed that is sufficiently high to reduce its’ drag to about half that of a
smooth sphere. This favorable reduction in drag is caused by the dimples on the golf ball surface which
trigger the boundary layer to transition from laminar to turbulent flow. Several widely published studies
have been conducted by Smits et al. [8-9], Bearman and Harvey [6], Choi et al. [7], Smith et al. [10] and
Ting et al. [11] on golf ball aerodynamics under spinning and non-spinning conditions. Despite this work
the mechanisms through which the dimpled surface influence the boundary layer transition have not been
fully understood to the extent that accurate force and trajectory prediction would be possible [4-5, 7-10].
Studies conducted by commercial golf ball manufacturers are generally kept “in-house” as confidential
information in a highly competitive market, and consequently very little information is available in the
public domain on development and the current performance of golf balls. In this context the primary
objective of this research is to experimentally evaluate the aerodynamic properties, especially drag, of a
series of commercially available golf balls with varied dimple characteristics, which are widely used in
professional and amateur/recreational golf.
2. Experimental Procedure
2.1. Description of balls
Eight brand new commercially available golf balls that are widely used in major tournaments around the
world were selected for this study. Each of these balls has different dimple characteristics. The average
diameter and mass of the golf ball is around 42.7 mm and 45.5 g. The balls’ retail prices vary significantly
from 2.5 to 7.0 Australian dollars. The commercial brand name and their physical characteristics (diameter,
cost and dimple shapes) are shown in Table 1. The pictorial dimple shapes are shown in Figure 1.
Table 1. Balls’ dimple types
Ball Name Dimple Shape
1 Titleist Pro V1 Circular
2 TaylorMade Circular
3 Srixon Circular
4 Callaway Hexagonal
5 Nike PD2 Circular (smaller and large)
6 Wilson Staff Circular flat
7 Top Flite Circular within Circular
8 MaxFli Circular shallow
Figure 1 shows the dimple configuration of each ball used in this study. The dimple shape and size are
quite different from each other; none of these eight balls have the same dimple size and configuration.
The dimple shape and size are quite different from each other as none of these 8 balls that have the
exactly same dimple size and configuration.
Each of these balls was tested in the RMIT Industrial Wind Tunnel using a six-component force
balance over a range of representative wind speeds (40 km/h to 140 km/h in increments of 20 km/h).
228 Firoz Alam et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 226–231
(a) Titleist Pro V1
(b) TaylorMade TP/Red LDP
(c) Top Flite D2 Distance
(d) Wilson Staff DX2
(e) Callaway Big Bertha
(f) Nike PD 2
(g) MaxFli
(h) Srixon AD333
Fig. 1. Range of golf balls used in this study.
2.2. Experimental set up
The study was conducted in the RMIT Industrial Wind Tunnel, which is a closed return circuit wind
tunnel with a turntable to enable study of cross wind effects. The maximum speed of the wind tunnel is
approximately 150 km/h, with a turbulence intensity of 1.8%. The wind tunnel test section has a
rectangular cross-section; dimensions of the test section are 3 m wide, 2 m high and 9 m long. Further
details about the tunnel can be found in Alam et al. [3]. The wind tunnel was calibrated before conducting
the experiments relevant to this present work, and the air speeds were measured via a modified NPL
ellipsoidal-head Pitot-static tube located at the same station as the golf ball, connected to a MKS Baratron
pressure sensor through flexible tubing.
A mounting stud was manufactured to hold the ball and was mounted on a six component force
balance (type JR-3) as shown in Figure 2. The 1
set up shown in Figure 2(a) was used for the initial
measurement however the interference drag was found to be very high compared the drag of the golf ball.
The 2
set up, shown in Figure 2(b), was developed later and found to be more suitable for this study.
Computer software developed in-house was used to acquire load data from the force balance, and
compute all six forces and moments (drag, side, and lift forces, and yaw, pitch, and roll moments), and
then calculate their non-dimensional coefficients.
Firoz Alam et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 226–231
(a) Setup A
(b) Setup B (improved, and used to obtain data presented here)
Fig. 2. Two experimental setups that have been used in this study shown here
The aerodynamic properties (drag, lift and side force and their corresponding moments) were
measured at wind speeds of 40 km/h to 140 km/h. The aerodynamic forces acting on the balls alone were
determined by subtracting the forces acting on the supporting gear only (with no ball attached) from the
combined force determined for balls attached to the supporting gear (mounting stud).
3. Results and Discussion
The output data from the wind tunnel computer data acquisition system comprised three forces (drag,
lift, and side force) and three moments (yaw, pitch, and roll). The drag coefficient (C
) and Reynolds
number (Re) were calculated by using the following formulae:
Re =
; where,
, V, d, μ and A are respectively the drag force, air density, wind velocity, ball diameter, absolute
dynamic viscosity of air, and projected frontal area of the ball.
The data shows significant variation between balls as far as C
is concerned, with the greatest variation
amongst most balls being evident at lower Reynolds numbers for the range tested. The aerodynamic
behaviour of a squash ball (with relatively smooth surface to replicate a smooth sphere) was also
measured to compare the findings with the smooth sphere data obtained by Achenbach [1]. The C
for the squash ball is also shown in Figure 3 for benchmarking purpose with the published data. The C
each golf ball varies significantly with Reynolds numbers, and the drag coefficient for all the balls
exhibits similar broad behaviours. The transition from the sub-critical region to the critical region is
complete at a Reynolds number of approximately 1×10
for all golf balls. At this Reynolds number, the
for each ball has decreased to its minimum value. In the data presented in Figure 3, only the Maxfli
golf ball has similar drag behaviour to that shown in Bearman and Harvey [7]. After the transition, the
Maxfli has a minimum C
value of approximately 0.25. Although most other golf balls also undergo
transition and have minimum values at around, their minimum C
value is significantly higher (between
25% and nearly 50%) compared to the Maxfli golf ball. The variation in C
values among the golf balls is
believed to be primarily due to the differences in boundary layer separation generated by different dimple
230 Firoz Alam et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 226–231
numbers, shapes, sizes, depths and patterns. The significant variation in drag coefficient between balls
with superficially similar dimpling suggests that even subtle differences in dimpling can produce
substantial changes in flow separations which consequently affect pressure drag.
As shown in Figure 3, although there is significant variation in C
values one ball, the Maxfli, has drag
characteristics that are distinctly different from all the other balls tested. Close examination of the dimple
geometry of the Maxfli showed that these dimples were shallow but not flat, and there was a significant
angle between the edge of dimples and the outer “spherical envelope”. Other balls appeared to have
somewhat smoothed profiles where the dimples merged into the outer “spherical envelope” which
reduced the angle in these areas. The data supports a conjecture that this relative “sharpness” opposed to
“smoothing” is a critical factor for drag reduction.
versus Re
6.E+04 7.E+04 8.E+04 9.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+05 1.E+05
Reynolds number, Re
Drag Coefficient, C
CBBD (Callaway)
MAX (Ma xfi )
NPD (Nike)
SR (W Staff)
SRN (Srixon)
T0M (TaylorMade 0)
T1F (Top Flite)
TPVX (Titleist Pro VX)
Squash ball
Fig. 3. Drag coefficient as a function of Reynolds Number for balls tested
4. Conclusions
The following conclusions were made from this work:
The dimple characteristics have significant effects on aerodynamic drag of golf balls.
Price did not correlate with performance for the balls purchased and tested.
The variation of drag coefficient among the current production golf balls has found to be as large as
40% due to dimple characteristics.
Data obtained supports a conjecture that the profile of the region where the dimple merges into the
outer “spherical envelope” has a strong influence on drag.
Firoz Alam et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 226–231
5. Future Work
Work is underway to characterize the dimples and relate them to aerodynamic properties. The effects
of spin on aerodynamic properties especially on drag and lift will be analysed.
Thorough flow visualization around a golf ball will be made.
A comparative study of CFD and EFD of golf ball aerodynamic properties is currently being
The authors are highly grateful to Mr. Danny Spasenoski, Mr. Dinh Le and Mr. Mustafa Salehi, School
of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University for their assistance with the
wind tunnel data acquisition and processing.
[1] Achenbach E. Experiments on the flow past spheres at very high Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics
[2] Alam F, Chowdhury H, Moria H, Steiner T and Subic A. A Comparative Study of Golf Ball Aerodynamics. Proceedings of
the 17th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (AFMC) 2010; 5-9 December, Auckland.
[3] Alam F, Zimmer G, Watkins S. Mean and time-varying flow measurements on the surface of a family of idealized road
vehicles. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Sciences 2003;27(5):639-654.
[4] Alam F, Chowdhury H, Subic A and Fuss FK. A Comparative Study of Football Aerodynamics. Procedia Engineering
[5] Aokia K, Muto K and Okanaga H. Aerodynamic Characteristics and Flow Pattern of a Golf Ball with Rotation. Procedia
Engineering 2010; 2(2):2431–2436.
[6] Aoki K, Ohike A, Yamaguchi K and Nakayama Y. Flying characteristics and flow pattern of a sphere with dimples. Journal
of Visualization 2003;6(1):67-76.
[7] Bearman PW and Harvey JK, Golf ball aerodynamics. Aeronautical Quarterly 1976; 27:112-122.
[8] Choi J, Jeon W, Choi H. Mechanism of drag reduction by dimples on a sphere. Physics of Fluids 2006;18:1-4.
[9] Smits AJ. and Ogg S. Golf Ball Aerodynamics. In: J.M. Pallis, R. Mehta, M. Hubbard, Editors, Proceedings 5th International
Sports Engineering Conference, 2004.
[9] Smits AJ. and Smith DR. A new aerodynamics model of a golf ball in flight. Science and Golf 1994;340-347.
[10] Smith CE, Beratlis N, Balaras E, Squires K and Tsunoda M. Numerical investigation of the flow over a golf ball in the
subcritical and supercritical regimes. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 2010;31:262–273.
[11] Ting LL. Effects of dimple size and depth on golf ball aerodynamic performance. In: 4th ASME-JSME Joint Fluids
Engineering Conference 2004.
... Also, the high-pressure region on the surface has facilitated the stream of wind flow. A high-speed area in the frontal tiers is extended and attached to the posterior region, forming an air blanket that has streamlined the flow, somewhat resembles the effect of dimples on reducing golf ball drag force (Alam et al., 2011). Also, in the same pattern with less intensification, profile 7 has gone through the same phenomenon, so this can add an explanation for drag force value (see Fig. 10). ...
Full-text available
Container shipping has become a cornerstone of global trade over the recent decades, while container ships' size has levelled up to over 20000 TEU. Despite a vast windage area, the studies on mega-sized container ships have been focused on the hydrodynamics characteristics, whereas the aerodynamic features have been neglected. The alarm was raised in March. 2021, when EverGreen, a 20000-TEU container vessel, went aground under gale in the Suez Canal, and one of the arteries of the world trade was blocked temporarily. Although the studies on huge container ship stacking configurations have been carried out by a few scholars, the aerodynamics of pyramid stacking configuration, as the most common loading practices, have not been appreciated. Henceforth, the present research aims to give an insight into the case by examining different cross-sectional pyramid profiles in 2D and 3D simulations using the commercial CFD package STARCCM +. Given the impact of maximal windage area on the interoperability and manoeuvring efficiency of the container ship, the lateral drag has been studied, where the flow field is modelled by the RANS equations and the realizable K-ε turbulence model. The objectives are threefold; the first is to analyze the applicability of 2D simulation for this case. The second is to scrutinize the flow behaviour in different pyramid stacking profiles. The last is to propose some guidelines for pyramid loading practice. According to the outcomes, an optimum pyramid configuration reduced a ship's lateral drag by 22.1% compared to the full-load profile while saving 384 TEU compared to the conventional pyramid models and could substitute the old-fashioned loading practice.
... The players, the coaches, and the spectators are very interested in the aerodynamics and flight trajectories of the new type of soccer balls. Many studies on the effects of the soccer balls' shapes on aerodynamics and flight trajectories have been conducted [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Studies on the effects of the panel orientation variations, owing to the number of panels reduction, on the aerodynamics and flight trajectories of the soccer balls have also been published [14][15][16][17][18]. ...
Full-text available
The surface structure of soccer balls, such as the number and shapes of the ball panels, has recently changed, and research on the aerodynamics and flight trajectories of new soccer balls is actively proceeding. However, these studies are focused on new soccer balls, whereas the used soccer balls were never studied. In this study, the aerodynamic characteristics of soccer balls kicked 1000 times by a robot were investigated through wind tunnel tests. The results were compared with those obtained using new soccer balls. Regarding the aerodynamic characteristics of the soccer balls, it was found that the critical Reynold number, Recrit, changes with usage. This is related to the transition from laminar to turbulent flow of airflow around the ball. The comparison of the drag coefficients of the balls at Recrit showed that the drag coefficients of the new and used Telstar18 balls were 0.15 (Re = 2.5 × 105) and 0.14 (Re = 2.2 × 105), respectively; those of the new and used Merlin were 0.13 (Re = 2.8 × 105) and 0.13 (Re = 2.2 × 105), respectively; and finally, those of the new and used Derbystar were 0.14 (Re = 2.1×105) and 0.14 (Re = 2.1×105), respectively. The surface conditions of a soccer ball, such as the surface roughness and surface damages, are essential factors to determine the aerodynamics of the soccer balls.
... Ogienko et al., 2017)(Amaro et al., 2011, 2015aLeung et al., 2017;Nolan et al., 2009;Ogienko et al., 2017;Shiehzadeh et al., 2019)In the case of using amino acids as surface modifying agents, there are several examples demonstrating the outstanding role of leucine in DPI formulations(Arora et al., 2016), however, its possible unwanted chemical reaction with active ingredient(Rashid et al., 2019), as well as the over-increased size and density of surface dimples at high leucine concentrations, which can lead to mechanical interlocking and lowered FPF values(Raula et al., 2009), limit leucine application in DPI formulations.Reviewing the data presented in this section reveals that particles with complex surface properties show better aerodynamic behavior than smoother particles. In this regard, physics rules are used to explain the effect of surface properties on aerodynamic features of particles.These rules explain why the golf ball with a dimpled and rough surface flies further compared to a smooth ball with the same size and weight(Alam et al., 2011;Chowdhury et al., 2016) (Figure 4). Dimples on the surface cause a turbulent boundary layer with longer attachment time to the back of the ball, which lowers turbulent wake with a smaller C D (drag coefficient) leading to lowered F D (drag force) on the ball (Equation 3). ...
Dry powder inhalers (DPI) are widely used systems for pulmonary delivery of therapeutics. The inhalation performance of DPIs is influenced by formulation features, inhaler device and inhalation pattern. The current review presents the affecting factors with great focus on powder characteristics which include particle size, shape, surface, density, hygroscopicity and crystallinity. The properties of a formulation are greatly influenced by a number of physicochemical factors of drug and added excipients. Since available particle engineering techniques result in particles with a set of modifications, it is difficult to distinguish the effect of an individual feature on powder deposition behavior. This necessitates developing a predictive model capable of describing all influential factors on dry powder inhaler delivery. Therefore, in the current study, a model was constructed to correlate the inhaler device properties, inhalation flow rate, particle characteristics and drug/excipient physico-chemical properties with the resultant fine particle fraction. The r² value of established correlation was 0.74 indicating 86 % variability in FPF values is explained by the model with the mean absolute errors of 0.22 for the predicted values. The authors believe that this model is capable of predicting the lung deposition pattern of a formulation with an acceptable precision when the type of inhaler device, inhalation flow rate, physicochemical behavior of active and inactive ingredients and the particle characteristics of DPI formulations are considered.
... Early studies confirmed that dimpled balls (golf balls) travel a greater distance and have better control than smooth balls, and that dimple depth and shape have a decisive impact on the ball's aerodynamic properties (Davies, 1949). Recent experimental work related aerodynamic drag of golf balls to dimple size and configuration, and revealed the critical role of dimple depth and shape (Alam et al., 2011;Ting, 2003). ...
Indented surface grooves can eliminate the laminar separation bubbles formed on airfoil surfaces, and thus have the potential to improve the aerodynamic performance of small wind turbines. In this study, a three-equation transitional turbulence model was selected and validated with experimental data to simulate the 2D flow around a NACA 4415 airfoil. Parametric simulation of surface groove characteristics was then conducted to investigate their effects on aerodynamic behavior. It was found that the recess depth ratio (h/δ, h: groove recess depth, δ: baseline boundary layer thickness) is the key influencing factor among the groove feature parameters, with the most effective value between h/δ=1.0 and 1.5. A smaller aspect ratio of recess depth to groove width is required to trap the vortex for a shallow recess depth, while a higher aspect ratio can stabilize the vortex for a deep recess. The endpoint of a groove can affect the potential vortex size within it, and the optimum endpoint is located around 0.16c (c: airfoil chord). Moreover, a rectangular groove especially for a recess depth ratio h/δ=1.2−1.5 offers better aerodynamic performance than an arc groove, as the rectangular configuration more efficiently restricts the flow motion inside the groove.
Full-text available
Drag reduction is an ever-present challenge within the aeronautical engineering industry. This paper presents two substantial wing modifications: the addition of a winglet of a freighter aircraft and a dimpled wing on the NACA 0017 aerofoils. Studies on nine (9) different geometries of dimpled aerofoils were performed against a control model of an aerofoil without any dimple. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was performed using two (2) commercial CFD platforms. This paper also explored two novel solutions of aircraft optimisation to mitigate the effects of drag and leading-edge pressure, while increasing the effect of lift. The optimised performance model of a freighter aircraft increased its aerodynamic efficiency. The study found that at take-off velocity of 82 m/s, winglets decreased pressure on the wing by 16.31%, through flow redirection and better flow integration into aerofoils wake. The study also analysed the separation layer and its effect through the appropriate use of the dimple effect. Increased lift effects were observed on a NACA 0017 aerofoil. Despite the low increase in drag of 6% from the modifications, the resultant L/D ratio was highly increased. This study also faced some challenges with validating the model. Hence some validation approaches were taken, and some other approaches suggested for future studies.
Full-text available
Transient numerical simulations were carried out by placing dimples at the top, sides and bottoms of the tail car streamline area of a high-speed maglev train. The results of an improved delayed detached eddy simulation turbulence model using three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes and shear-stress transport K-Omega double equations were compared to the results of a wind tunnel test to verify the numerical simulation accuracy, within 5% of the ground truth, which is an acceptable precision range. The results show that dimples arranged on the streamline area atop the train tail car affected the locations at which the airflow at the top and bottom of the train met and weakened the strength of the wake. The aerodynamic drag and lift coefficient decreased by 3.40% and 4.27%, respectively. When the dimples were arranged on the streamline area at the sides or bottoms of the train tail car, they had little effect on the top of the tail car, so they did not destroy the balance of the airflow at the top and bottom. They also had little influence on the development of wake topology. Therefore, the aerodynamic drag and lift of the train changed little.
Friction drag is a nonnegligible matter when relative motion happens between solid and liquid phase, which brings many inconveniences in ship navigation, fluid transportation, microfluid devices, etc. Thereby various methods have been developed focusing on friction drag reduction. In this article, a review of several widely studied drag reduction methods is given, specially, their advantages and limitations in practical applications are discussed. Besides, a comparison of different methods is made and the development prospect of drag reduction is concluded.
In our day to day life we see the phenomenon of turbulence everywhere, and it is one of the main reasons in loss of energy. We all know about the energy crisis our world is facing and the global warming problem planet earth is facing, so there is an urgent need to decrease our energy consumption and for that increasing efficiency is one of a key factor. One of the major part in turbulence is the viscous force that occurs between any two boundaries be it solid–liquid or solid–gas boundary. The friction force which occurs in turbulence greatly decreases the efficiency, so decreasing the friction forces can significantly improves the efficiency. In his paper boundary layer control methods which can help in drag reduction are reviewed. Methods such as polymer additives, super hydrophobic surfaces, air bubbles drag reduction, morphology drag reductions composite drag reductions were reviewed along with their applications in various fields is discussed. Finally some new ideas are presented to improve the current drag reduction techniques.
In the past decades, drag-reduction surfaces have attracted more and more attention due to their potentiality and wide applications in various fields such as traffic, energy transportation, agriculture, textile industry, and military.
Full-text available
The aerodynamic behaviour of oval shaped sports balls especially Rugby ball is considered to be complex due to its physical shape. Although some experimental studies were undertaken on Rugby ball aerodynamic behaviour, scant information on computational aerodynamic study for Rugby balls is available in the public domain. The primary objective of this work is to undertake a computational study of a smooth surface Rugby ball and pimple surface Rugby ball aerodynamic properties and compare the findings with experimental data. Both experimental and computational studies were undertaken for a range of wind speeds and yaw angles. The average drag coefficient of the rugby at zero yaw was found by experimentally and computationally to be 0.18 and 0.15 and this rose to about 0.60 and 0.31 respectively when yawed at 90¼. The pimple caused slightly more drag at zero yaw angle compared to 90¼ yaw angle.
Full-text available
The present study investigated the aerodynamic characteristics and flow pattern of a golf ball with 328 circular arc dimples. The aerodynamic forces and the flow pattern around a golf ball were investigated experimentally. The detailed flow pattern around a golf ball was then investigated computationally by Large eddy simulation. The aerodynamic characteristics and the flow pattern of a golf ball with rotation were clarified. In addition, the flying distance was clarified through a flying simulation based on the aerodynamic forces and the flow pattern.
A wind tunnel technique has been developed to measure the aerodynamic forces acting on golf balls over a wide range of Reynolds number and spin rate. Balls with round dimples and hexagonal dimples have been investigated. The dimples are found to induce a critical Reynolds number behavior at a lower value of Reynolds number than experienced by a smooth sphere and beyond this point, unlike the behavior of a sand-roughened sphere there is little dependence of the forces on further increases in Reynolds number. A hexagonally-dimpled ball has a higher lift coefficient and a slightly lower drag coefficient than a conventional round-dimpled ball. Trajectories are calculated using the aerodynamic data and the ranges are compared with data obtained from a driving machine on a golf course.
Conference Paper
Based on the three-dimensional CFD modeling method reported previously, systematic computational sensitivity studies of how the changes of dimple size, depth, number, coverage area, and distribution pattern will affect the golf ball aerodynamic performance have been made by considering those variables individually and then collectively. By using a new golf ball surface design with 344 identical single-sized circular dimples, but keeping the dimple distribution pattern and the dimple diameter unchanged, the dimple depth effect was first investigated by varying the dimple depressions from shallow to deep, and an optimum value corresponding to minimum drag loss has been found. Using the balls with same optimum dimple depth, drag results show the tendency of decreasing as the dimple diameter increases from small to large until a limit is reached. Beyond this limit, drag coefficient will remain to be a constant even with the further increases of the dimple diameter. Ball drag and lift results obtained and presented are not only for the whole ball, but also separately for the dimple occupied area and the dimple-free cage area. Influence of ball backspin motion to the magnitude of the dimple’s optimum depth value was found to be insignificant. Flow field solutions of velocity vectors, trace lines, pressure, and turbulence intensity have also been obtained, and some are used to show how the changes of dimple depth, dimple diameter, as well as the ball backspin motion, will affect the wake formation behind the ball both in size and shape.
Conference Paper
The aerodynamic behaviour of the golf ball is primarily dependent on the physical features of complex dimples. The dimples vary in sizes, shapes and depths which generate complex aerodynamic flow pattern around the ball. Although some studies have been conducted on golf ball aerodynamics, the aerodynamic behaviour of dimple characteristics is not fully understood. The primary objective of this research is to experimentally evaluate the aerodynamic properties (drag, lift/down force) of a series of commercially available golf balls. Each of these new balls has different dimple characteristics. These balls were tested under a range of speeds. The aerodynamic properties were analysed. Due to varied dimple geometry, the magnitudes of drag coefficients of these balls were varied significantly. The non-dimensional drag coefficient for each ball was compared. The effects of spin on drag and lift have also been evaluated. However, spin data was not included in this paper.
In this Letter we present a detailed mechanism of drag reduction by dimples on a sphere such as golf-ball dimples by measuring the streamwise velocity above the dimpled surface. Dimples cause local flow separation and trigger the shear layer instability along the separating shear layer, resulting in the generation of large turbulence intensity. With this increased turbulence, the flow reattaches to the sphere surface with a high momentum near the wall and overcomes a strong adverse pressure gradient formed in the rear sphere surface. As a result, dimples delay the main separation and reduce drag significantly. The present study suggests that generation of a separation bubble, i.e., a closed-loop streamline consisting of separation and reattachment, on a body surface is an important flow-control strategy for drag reduction on a bluff body such as the sphere and cylinder.
The aerodynamics of golf balls is still not well understood, primarily because the aerodynamic performance of the golf ball depends crucially on the details of the airflow over the ball, and those details are controlled by many factors. As the ball flies through the air, it develops lift and drag forces that depend on its velocity, spin rate, the atmospheric conditions, and, most importantly, the shapes of the individual dimples, and their arrangement over the surface of the ball. It has been said that it is more difficult to predict the performance of a golf ball than it is to predict the performance of a full-scale aircraft (see, for example, Moin & Kim, 1997). Nevertheless, a great deal of experimental work has been done, and our basic understanding is reasonably complete. In this chapter, we describe the factors that govern the aerodynamic performance of a golf ball. We will discuss the complicated nature of the flow over a spinning golf ball, and why the dimples, and their arrangement on the surface, play such a crucial role. We will describe the design methods used by the golf ball companies in their search for better performance, and the testing procedures used by the regulating bodies, notably the USGA, in enforcing the Rules.
The present work is concerned with the flow past spheres in the Reynolds number range 5 × 104 [less-than-or-eq, slant] Re [less-than-or-eq, slant] 6 × 106. Results are reported for the case of a smooth surface. The total drag, the local static pressure and the local skin friction distribution were measured at a turbulence level of about 0·45%. The present results are compared with other available data as far as possible. Information is obtained from the local flow parameters on the positions of boundary-layer transition from laminar to turbulent flow and of boundary-layer separation. Finally the dependence of friction forces on Reynolds number is pointed out.
In order to understand the role of surface dimpling on the flow over a golf ball, direct numerical simulations (DNS) are conducted within the framework of an immersed boundary approach for two physical regimes. Computations of the flow over a non-rotating golf ball are reported for a subcritical flow at a Reynolds number of 2.5 × 104 and a supercritical case at a Reynolds number of 1.1 × 105. Grid refinement studies for both Reynolds numbers indicated that characteristics of the subcritical flow could be captured using a mesh of 337 × 106 points, and for the supercritical case using a grid with 1.2 × 109 points. Flow visualizations reveal the differences in separation characteristics between the two Reynolds numbers. Profiles of the mean velocity indicate that the flow detaches completely at approximately 84° in the subcritical case (measured from the stagnation point at the front of the ball), while in the supercritical regime there are alternating regions of reattachment and separation within dimples with complete detachment around 110°. Energy spectra highlight frequencies associated with vortex formation over the dimples prior to complete detachment in the supercritical regime. Reynolds stresses quantify momentum transport in the near-wall region, showing that the axial stress increases around 90° for the subcritical case. In the supercritical regime these stress components alternately increase and decrease, corresponding to local separation and reattachment. Prediction of the drag coefficient for both Reynolds numbers is in reasonable agreement with measurements.