-rl
METAT IONS IN
BIOTOGICAT SYSTEMS
Edited by Astrid Sigel
Helmut Sigel "oa
Inslitule o, ,norgcfnic Cùemistry University of Bosel
CH-4056 Bdsel, Siyitze ond
VOLUME 34
Mercury and Its Effects on Environmént and Biologry
MnRcpu Dprxen, INc. NEw YoRK . Baspl . HoNc Korlc
ISBN: 0-8247-9828-Z
îhis book is printed on acid-free paper.
COPYRIGHT @ 1997 by MARCEL DEKKER, INC. ALL RIGITTS RTSERVED
11"itr5s1rÀis book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy- ing, microfflming, and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
MARCEL DEKKER, INC.
270 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016
Cunent printing (last digit): 10987654321
PRINIED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
8
Microbial Tbansformation of Mercury Species and Their Importance
in the Biogeochemical Cycle of Mercury
Franco Bald.i
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Siena, Via P.A. Mattioli, 4, I-53100 Siena, Italy
1. INTRODUCTION 214
2. MICROBIAL RESISTANCE TO INORGANIC MERCURY 2t5
2.1. Mercury Resistance in Prokaryotic Cells 2t5
2.2. Mercury Tolerance in Eukaryotic Cells 221
2.3. Role of Mercury-resistant Microbes in the
Environment 223
3. BIOMETTryLATION OF MERCURY 226
3.1. Biosynthesis of Monomethylmercury 228
3.2. Mercury Methylation in the Environment 230
3.3. Dimethylmercury Biosynthesis: The Final Product of
Mercury Methylation 234
4. THE ROLE OF METACINNABAR. THE MOST STABLE MERCURY SPECIES 247
5. NEW VIEW OF THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF MERCURY
244
213
214 BALDI
ABBREVIéffIONS 247 REFERENCES 248
1. INTRODUCTION
Mercury (Hg) occurs in nature as ionic and elemental mercury. Natural sources include the weathering of cinnabar (HgS) deposits and volcanic and geothermal emissions. Man-made sources include the exploitation of geothermal fields for power generation, combustion of fossil fuels, mining, chloralkali plants, and other minor industrial activities. Syn- thetic organomercurials have been banned for some decades, but more than9OVo oftotal Hgin muscle tissue oftop marine predators, such as in tuna and in seabirds, is monomethylmercury (MMHg), the most toxic species of Hg. MMHg crosses cell membranes by passive transport, and its long half-time in biological tissues leads to high concentrations at the top of the food chain. Minimal increases in the MMHg content of autotrophic organisms produces an unexpectedly large accumulation of Hg (biomagnification) in carnivores.
The transformation of inorganic Hg to MMHg in the environment is commonly accepted to be the work of microbes. Hg transformation by microbes is the result of adaptation to Hg toxicity. The most common detoxifying mechanism is the enz5rmatic reduction of Hgz+ to Hg(O) and confers high resistance to inorganic mercury salts. This narrow- spectrum of Hg resistance is harbored in plasmids in the inducible mer operon. The catalytic protein mercuric reductase is codified by t}:re merA gene. Less common but very important are the broad-spectrum Hg- resistant bacteria, which cleave the C-Hg bond of organomercurials by means of the enzyme organomercurial lyase, codified by the merB gene. Other proteins are involved in the control, binding, and transport of Hg. Other adaptive strategies have been developed to tolerate high Hg concentrations by production of extra- and intracellular polymers and./ or reactive molecules. Under anaerobic conditions, Hg toxicity is dras- tically reduced by organic and inorganic sulfides such as HrS. The latter reacts with Hgz+ and MMHg to produce the stable HgS and the volatile dimethylmercury (DMHg), respectively.
However, MMHg is also produced under these conditions and it is
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 215
still unclear, where, when, and what produces MMHg in the environ- ment. After 30 years of research, the mechanism of accumulation of high percentages of MMHg at the top of the food chain is still a matter of controversy.
The recent development of specific methods has made it possible to determine Hg species at femtomole levels. This has led to the detection of DMHg in the subthermocline of the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans and in the Mediterranean Sea, mangrove sediments, soil, and axenic cul- tures of anaerobic bacteria. It is also produced by the chemical reaction of methylcobalamin and inorganic mercury compounds. These occur- rences suggest that DMHg is of microbial origin and that MMHg is an intermediate product of a detoxifying mechanism, which produces the harmless DMHg. Unfortunately, the double methylation (dimethyla- tion) of Hg is slower than the accumulation of MMHg by cells, because MMHg crosses cell membranes at a high rate and inhibits metabolism more than does ionic mercury. To date, the absence of DMHg in the freshwater lakes of the northern hemisphere suggests that in these ecosystems MMHg is mostly of abiotic origin owing to the high concen- trations ofhumic acid and temperatures farbelow optimal for microbial activity for most of the year. In this chapter, it is sustained that the cycle of Hg is dominated by microbial activity and that bacteria convert toxic forms of Hg to harmless ones to detoxify themselves and the surround- ing environment.
2. MICROBIAL RESISTANCE TO INORGANIC MERCURY
2.1. Mercury Resistance in Prokaryotic Cells
Mercury existed in the environment long before the origin of life, but together with other elements with similar atomic numbers (Pt, Au, Tl, Pb, and Bi) it was not part of the primeval metabolism because of the low concentrations of these elements in the Earth's crust. The loga- rithm (Logro) of relative abundance of Hg is 6.5 orders of magnitude less (-2.5\ than that of the reference element Si = 4 [1]. During the Archean era, when conditions were anoxic on a globale scale, Hg was mainly complexed to sulfides. It only became available to microbes once photo-
216 BALDI
synthesis had evolved massive O, concentrations into the atmosphere. Volatile Hg(O) emitted by intense volcanic activity reacted with sulfides and also with O, and halogens, becoming soluble and toxic. WiLh2IVo of O, in the atmosphere and 2.6 t lgzt g of Cl in the oceans [2], Hg is one of the most toxic elements on Earth today.
Since the origin of life, aerobic bacteria had to adapt to Hg- enriched environments and developed different detoxifying strategies. To date, the most common Hg detoxification mechanism is common in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. These microbes transform inorganic Hg to volatile Hg(O) by means of the enzyme mercuric reduc- tase. Hg resistance was discovered by Moore [3] in a Staphylococcus aureus strain at the Torbay Hospital, Exeter, UK. Hg-resistant bacteria were found to grow on peptone agar amended with high concentrations of HgClr. Inorganic mercury resistance was associated with other resis- tance factors (antibiotics) [4] harbored in transferable plasmids. These plasmids conferred resistance to Hg and other metals (Ni and Co) [5]. A separate locus of Hg resistance, among other metal resistances, was observed in Escherichia coli and Salmonella 16l. The same year, Tono- mura et al. [7] isolated the first strain resistant to the organomercurial phenylmercury from contaminated soil. The plasmid-borne origin of broad-spectrum Hg resistance was identified several years later in E. coli and Pseudomonas a.eruginoso [8,9].
After several years ofresearch, the genes involved in narrow and broad-spectrum resistance in mer operorrs were sequenced in gram- positive and gram-negative bacteria [10]. The two products of merA
and merB genes were mercuric reductase and organomercurial lyase, respectively. Today, their molecular weight, kinetic parameters, amino acids, and DNA sequences are well known t10-211. The synthesis of the catabolic genes merA and merB is regulated by merR, which codes for regulatory proteins. Other genes, merP and merT, synthesize pro- teins for the binding and transport, respectively, of Hg species into the cell. A supplementary gene, merC, codes for a further Hg transport protein (MerC), which is embedded in the inner membrane with MerT. A rnerD with some regulatory activity has been found sporadically in some operons. The mer operons are commonly sited on transposons of the "TnJ family". The element Tn501 t22-251originated from the p aeruginosa plasmid and Tn21 element from plasmid R100 (originally from Shigella) wittr substantial homology (>707o) to TnS01 126-291.
'ì
.:
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 217
Genetic information on the mer operoî has been reviewed several times t30-331 and is also discussed in detail in this volume.
Other types of nonenzymatic Hg resistance in bacteria have not been reviewed so often because of varied and sometimes contradictory results. An attempt to clarify the various nonspecific Hg detoxification mechanisms necessitates a few definitions, for example, the terms 119 resistance and llg tolerance are often considered to be synonymous. Here they are defined as follows: Hg resistance is when there is a specific enzyme response to Hg coded by genes for the synthesis of an inducible enzyme, which maintains homeostatic Hg concentrations at subtoxic levels in the cytoplasm. The inhibition pathway has kinetics of the Michaelis-Menten type. Hg tolerance is when there is a nonhomeo- static and nonspecific mechanism towards Hg. Hg tolerance manifests with a gradual inhibitory effect by Hg and other metals. The inhibition pathway depends on the concentrations of reacting compounds such as polymers, which sequester metals, or molecules such as organic and inorganic sulfides, which convert or react with Hg species. These poly- mers and sulfides are produced irrespective of the presence of Hg and other metals. These two terms have a meaning if they are referred to the term Hg sensitivity in bacteria, which are deficient of homeostatic mechanisms and sequestering or reacting agents (better explained in the legend of Fig. L).
Certain nonspecific mechanisms of Hg detoxification reported in the past are dubious, because Hg(O) volatilization analysis was not always performed to check for mercuric reductase. In defining other nonspecific detoxifying mechanisms, it is important to know whether enzymatic transformation of Hg is occurring.
A type of Hg tolerance was reported in Staphylococcus aureus strains M3, SC, and SD isolated from humans and in strain K1015 from a culture collection (Giessen, Germany). The mechanism of tolerance was based on extracellular binding of Hg by polysaccharide polymer com- pounds, which were not decomposed in the presence of Hg2+ by extra- cellular lytic enzymes [34]. All the strains were initially sensitive to a minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 Fg'ml,-t HgClr. After serial transfers, strains adapted to grow up to 20 Fg'ml,-t of HgClr. Hg tolerance was associated with a complete loss of degrading enzymes, such as lipases and phospholipases, and reduced production of a-hemo- lysin, B-hemolysin, and protein A. The enzymatic activities decreased as Hg tolerance increased.
218
BALDI
Resìstance
80
8oo v40
FIG. 1. Diagram showing the differences between Hg resistance, Hg tolerance, and Hg sensitivity in bacteria. The latter is the reference used to define the other two. A Hg-sensitive strain is by definition inhibited by the minimal concentrations of Hg. Hg resistance is due to a detoxifying mechanism specific for Hg and inhibition is due to saturation of mercuric reductase. Hg toìerance is nonspecific for Hg and is based on sequestration or reactive compounds which are produced irrespective of metal concentrations.
Another type of Hg tolerance was reported, for example, in a strain of Pseudomonas oleouorans isolated from activated sludge. This strain was tolerant up to 350 pg.ml-l of Hg2+, 100 Fg.ml,-t of Cdz+,40 pg'mL 1 of Cr6+, and 1000 FB.ml,-t of Cu2+. Tfansmission electron microscope measurements revealed cells with many electron-dense granules in the cyboplasm. Chemical analysis showed that about 80Zo of the Hgtaken up was in the cytoplasm and the rest in the cell envelope fraction. In the insoluble cytoplasmic fraction, Hg was found in polysac- charide polyphosphates and lipopolysaccharide fractions [BS]. This in- tracellular metal sequestering mechanism was also found in the cyano- bacterium Plectonemq boryanum, which produces polyphosphate bodies that sequester significant amounts of various metals. When exposed to 100 pg.ml--l of Hg2+ as HgClr, these autotrophic cells accumulated significant Hg concentrations in the polyphosphate bodies and little in
Sensit ivity
Tólerance
o lo f*-"",X"nr.u,1o.r,r',i8o
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 219
the cytoplasm [36]. Other subcellular structures such as extra- and intracellular membrane compartmentalization of Hg in intrathylacoid whorls can be regarded as a further detoxifying mechanism conferring additional Hg tolerance to P boryanum [37,38].
The synthesis of metal-binding compounds may also be a mecha- nism of Hg detoxification. A metal-binding metallothionein protein was isolated among prokaryotes in Synechococcus sp. [39]. This type of protein is characterized as a group of low molecular weight molecules with a high metal and cysteine content f40,411. They were first found in the equine renal cortex [421. The metallothionein-like proteins have been found more in eukaryotic than prokaryotic cells [39,43,44]' T}:,e precise role of these proteins is unknown, but they are certainly in- volved in heavy metal detoxification [38,45]. In Synechococcus strains PCC 630 and PCC 7942,the metallothionein was found to be a product of gene smtA 146,471.
A further Hg-detoxifying mechanism, based on nonenzymatic re- duction of inorganic Hg, was reported for the cyanobacterítm Synecho- cocctts bacillaris. A strain that volatilízedHg2+ to Hg(O) at a rate of 6.6 pmol.pg-t. Chlo d-1, which is about 30 times that carried out by micro- algae [481. The mechanism of Hg volatilization was not enzymatic and is still unknown; however, in phytoplankton, the smaller cyanobac- teria were found to be the main Hg reducers. It would be worthwhile to study this nonspecific Hg transformation in detail. Hg volatilization was very low compared with the enz;rmatic efficiency of the gram- positive and gram-negative aerobic heterotrophic bacteria, but it may be important in relation to the environmental impact of Hg mobiliza- tion in the hydrosphere, since cyanobacteria can reach concentrations of >108 cell'L-r [48].
In anaerobic organisms, Hg biotransformation is not well under- stood and other mechanisms of Hg tolerance have been hypothesized [49,50] . Variable tolerance to inorganic and organic mercury com- pounds was found in the strictly anaerobic bacteria Bacteroides rumi- nicola and in Clostridiunt perfringens, which was isolated from clinical settings and sewage [511. Inorganic mercury resistance in these isolates was neither inducible nor plasmid mediated.
Under laboratory conditions, Hg tolerance often manifests in an- aerobes, because the strains are gTown in the presence ofhigh concen- trations of cysteine, a reducing agent. The addition of 1mM of cysteine
220 BALDI
chloride to the medium increases the Hg tolerance 17-fold [51]. Anaer- obic species such as Bacteroides succinogenes, B. fibrosoluens, and Megasphera elsdenii showed Hg tolerances to 100 Fg . ml,-t Hgz+ and to 326 pg'mL-rHgz+, respectively, because they were cultured in media rich in cysteine or cysteine plus rumen fluid from cattle [52]. A 40Vo reduction by Hg volatilization was found during 20-min incubation with 2o3}Ig2+ added into the media in the absence of sulfydryl groups with induced and uninduced strains of Enterobacter cloacae, B. ruminicola, and,E. coli [5]). However, Hg volatilization was not rapid or complete, as it is for the enzymatic Hg resistance.
The strictly anaerobic Clostridium cochlearium strain T-2 was found to be tolerant to 800 Fg.mL 1HgCl, in a medium containing 0.0l%o cysteine [53]. This strain was also demonstrated to be able to degrade MMHg by the virtue of a plasmid which did not harbor mer operon but had the capability to produce HrS. This compound has been demonstrated to have a detoxifying activity on MMHg, which is trans- formed to DMHg and B-HgS 1541. Desulfouibrio desulfuricans tolerated 100 times more MMHg than the broad-spectrum Hg-resistant Pseudo- monas putida strain FB-1, which can degrade 1 pg of MMHg en- zymatically to CHn and Hg(0) in t h [551. Organic sulfides, therefore, transform or bind Hg and significantly reduce its toxicity in anaerobic environments. This means that Hg is harmless and stable in anoxic compartments, and microbes may not need any enzymatic and./or energy-dependent mechanism to reduce Hg toxicity.
Another mechanism of Hg tolerance, the oxidative demethylation of MMHg under anoxic conditions, was recently reported [56,57]. La- beled raCHrHgI spiked into two strains of Desulfouibrio was converted to laCHn from the methyl group of MMHg and laCHn and 1aCO, were formed by a methylotrophic methanogenic culture grown on trimethyl- amine. Tlaces of CHn were also observed during the conversion of MMHg (reductive dimethylation) to DMHg in axenic cultures of D. desulfuricans [58]. Oxidative demethylation of MMHg was also identi- fied in sediments of the Carson River, Nevada. Inhibition of sulfate reduction by additions of molybdate resulted in a significantly de- pressed demethylation of the oxidation/reduction ratio. Addition of sul- fates to sediment slurries stimulated the production of laCO, from [1aC]MMHg, whereas additions of 2-bromo-ethane-sulfonic acid (BESA), an inhibitor of methanogenesis, blocked raCHa production [52].
Ì
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 221
2.2. Mercury Tolerance in Eukaryotic Cells
The enzymatic Hg resistance conferred by the flavoenzyme mercury reductase has not yet been found in eukaryotic cells. The mer operon was successfully transferred to a recipient strain of Saccharomyces cereuisiae, but the efficiency of the detoxifnng mechanism was reduced by one order of magnitude with respect to the donor E. coli S-17-1 t591. The modified yeast-synthesized Hg reductase was five times more resi- stant than the Hg-sensitive S. cereuisiae strain Afl22. The reduced efficiency of Hg volatilization in eukaryotic cells is probably due to a slower passive diffusion of Hg(O) than in the small prokaryotic cells. This experiment probably suggests why the detoxifying enzymatic mechanism of prokaryotic cells did not develop in eukaryotic cells.
Natural Hg volatilization as Hg(0) has, however, been reported in the yeasts Cryptococcus sp., Candida albicans, and Saccharomyces cereuisiae [60,61]. The Cryptococcus sp. strain exposed to high concen- trations of HgCl, reduced Hg2+ significantly in the supernatant, but on the other hand, the yeast cells accumulated up to 90 pg' g-1 of total Hg when exposed to 180 pg'ml,-l HgClr. Electron micrographs of un- stained cells showed Hg associated with the cell wall and intracellular vacuoles. Elemental analysis did not provide any information about the Hg species complexed to the wall, but the fact remains that this Hg is retained by the cells and does not diffuse away as does Hg(O).
Hg volatilization has also been reported in the green algae Chla' mydomonas sp. and Chlorella pyrenoidosa 162,631. The latter vol- atilized Hg(0) in 8 days, after a lag phase of 4 days, by means of low molecular weight (smaller than 1200 Dalton) intracellular reducing factor t631. Hg volatilization has even been found in phyboplankton growing in defined media, natural seawater, and freshwater [48]. Ma- rine eukaryotic phytoplankton (>3 pm) reduced Hg'* to Hg(0), but this conversion was much lower than in cyanobacteria, which were the predominant autotrophic Hg reducers. The mechanism of the slow Hg volatilization (0.5 pmol'pg-l Chlo 6-t) which occurs in the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and in the green algae Dunaliella tertiolecta
and P au lou a lutheri is unknown . ln T. w e i s sflogll, this nonspecifi c metal reduction is probably due to agents which are also able to reduce Cu2+ to Cu+ at a higher rate [64].
222
BALDI
4-5
è0
èo
-l e4
h 6)?
,-^
Mercury chloride (pglml-)
FIG. 2. Accumulation of total Hg in algal cells exposed for 3 h to different concentrations of HgClr: dead cells of Scenedesmzs sp. (r) and in Scenedesmus acutus (o) and in photosynthesizing cells of Scenedesrnus sp. (n) and Scene- desmus acutus (o). In the latter two, the low accumulation was related to a higher rate of photosynthesis.
A different mechanism of Hg tolerance was recently found in green microalgae isolated from polluted areas in Ttrscany, Italy. Hg tolerance ín Scenedesmus sp. was related to lower Hg uptake in the photo- synthesis and respiratory modes of the Hg-tolerant strain than in the Hg-sensitive Scenedesmus dcutus (Fig. 2). In dead cells, Hg accumula- tion was similar for both strains t651. An energetic mechanism was hypothesized to be associated with the photosynthetic activity of the Hg-tolerant strain. In Scenedesmus sp., high O, evolution rates and a high intra- and extracellular pH may also be responsible for the chemi- cal conversion of spiked soluble HgClo to the less soluble mercury
rì
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 223
hydroxide [Hg(OH)r] in the medium, which became highly aerobic and alkaline (pH = 10 in 3 h) [66,67]. So the reduced Hg uptake by the Hg- tolerant Scenedesmus sp. additionally was due to the a possible co- precipitation of Hg(OH)2 with colloidal particles associated with the other mineral hydroxides of the medium. In other experiments, Scene- desmus obliquus has been observed to form colloids offerric hydroxides, phosphates, and carbonates and to coprecipitate ionic Cu and Cd [68,69]. Moreover, it was hypothesized that HS(OH)z formed in the colloidal fraction associated with photosynthetic pigment distribution in the seawater column [70].
2.3. Role of Mercury-resistant Microbes in the Environment
Since the 1970s, several reports have been published on narrow- and broad-spectrum Hg-resistant bacteria isolated from different fresh- water [71] and marine environments [72,73]. All isolates carried out the same detoxifyrng reactions with the two enzymes, mercuric reductase and organomercurial lyase. Broad-spectrum Hg-resistant bacteria are less common than those of the narrow spectrum. The latter were found in the estuary of Minamat aBay , Japan [74] . Thousands of strains were subsequently isolated from sediments and were characterized in terms of eight different pathways of inorganic and organic compounds, as reported in Table 1 t751.
In the Mediterranean area, the first isolation of Hg-resistant bac- teria was near pyrite and cinnabar mines in T\rscany, Italy [76]. Out of 37 aerobic heterotrophic species isolated, only six volatilized Hg2* to Hg(0). A chemolitotrophic T. ferroxidans strain SW9K-1was isolated from pyrite mines t77l.It showed a constitutional Hg resistance similar to strain BA-4 isolated from a coal mine settling pond in Wyoming [78]. Thirty-six Hg-resistant strains of 106 heterotrophic bacteria were later isolated from the Fiora River, which drains an area of cinnabar deposits in southern T\rscany. Seven strains were classified as broad- spectrum Hg-resistant and degraded MMHg [79]. In all37 strains, Hg resistance was due to the volatilization of Hg2+ to Hg(0), and it was always inducible.
The inducibility of Hg resistance is an evident adaptation to Hg
TABLE 1
Volatilization Patterns and Frequency of Mercury Compound-volatilizing Strains from Minamata Bay and Control Stations
Pattern of volatilizationu l2345678strains
Total
Hgz+VVVVVVVV
Methyl-Hg
Ethyl-Hg
Thimerosal FluoresceineHgacetate NV Phenyl-Hg acetate NV lnr
NV NV
NV NV
NV NV NV l\n/ lln/
NV NV V V V V NV NV V V V V V NV V VVVVV NV V NV NV NV V NV NV V NV NV NV V V
V V
p-Chloro Hg benzoate
NostrainsMinamataBay 10 16 I 11 3 1 6 19 75 (n = 1428)
Control(n=3176, 18 16 4
12 value 0.28 5.34b 8.83" 10.6c 0.20 0.07 13.3c 41.8" 42.5"
uV, Volatilization; NV, no volatilization.
bp < 0.05.
? < 0.01.
Source: Reproduced with permission from [75].
5 I 2 0 0 54
ru r\) è
(D
t- 0
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 225
stress. Mercury ions alter microbial community structure and function [80]. The mechanism of adaptation in situ was studied in detail by Barkay [81] in different freshwater, salt marsh and marine environ- ments. If water samples were preexposed to HgCl, (250 p"g. L-1), the Hg residence time was shorter than in freshwater. In environments rich in humic acid (salt marsh), Hg binding to organic material slowed down Hg volatilization and its residence time. Hg volatilization has been correlated with its bioavailability for bacteria. If Hg is complexed by chlorine in seawater, the reduction of Hg(II) to Hg(0) is faster than in
freshwater samples, where inorganic Hg occurs mainly as hydroxides and is therefore less available [31,81]. When Hg is added, the population of Hg-resistant bacteria increases in percentage, but it decreases in biodiversity [81].
Similar experiments were carried out with two to four orders of magnitude lower concentrations of HgCl, (from 0.02 to 2 pg'l-t) spiked in a controlled freshwater system. In the water column, the unexposed microbial community increased suddenly from 0.02 to 2lVo in a 12-h experiment and then gradually decreased over a week to almost pris- tine values. During sampling, there was an instant decrease in the Hg- sensitive population in24h on the one hand and, on the other hand, an increase from one to seven different Hg-resistant species in week-long experiments [82]. It is not clear whether the Hg-resistant species were uninduced but already present in the controlled system or ifthey be- came Hg-resistant by horizontal gene transfer from the frrst Hg- resistant isolate. This aspect of Hg resistance mobility in a natural microbial population was studied in "in situ mating" experiments with epilithic bacteria isolated from a river in southern Wales using a natu- ral plasmid pQMl harboring narro\M-spectrum Hg resistance [83]. A highly signifrcant linear relationship was found between the loga- rithmic transfer frequency of the plasmid in relation to water tempera- ture changes from 6 to 21"C. The transfer frequency increased by 10-fold for every 2.6oC increase.
The determination of mer genes in Tn21 was also used to deter- mine the role of this transposon in the adaptation of microbial commu- nities to ionic mercury [84]. Cross hybridization with Tn2l was found ín50Vo of Hg-resistant bacteria strains in two freshwater communities, but only in l27o of strains represented in two saline communities. It is a common finding that Hg-resistant strains from different environ-
226 BALDI
ments do not hybridize with the same genetic probe [85,86]. However, it is always possible to determine a positive correlation between metal resistance and Hg contaminations as measured by using the plate count method [87] and/or hybridization with genetic probes [83,84]. Some- times no relationship between metal content and the relative percent- age of resistant microbes is found, because below the minimum metal threshold concentration there is no response. Because Hg resistance is inducible, the detoxifying mechanism is switched off at very low Hg concentrations.
Organomercurial resistance is another known type of Hg resis- tance, but there have been few papers on organomercurial adaptation and not much is known about the distribution of merB (the gene coding for organomercurial lyase) in the environment. Significant Hg resis- tance has been found in bacterial communities isolated from New Hope Pond and Reality Lake (Tennessee) contaminated by Hg(0) t881. MMHg resistance seemed to be slightly higher in the pond communities than in those of control water. However, the response of the microbial commu- nities was feeble because of the very low Hg concentrations. When 10 pg.L-lMMHg was added, the MMHg resistance of the microbial com- munity of the pond water increased significantly. Conversely, in a con- trolled freshwater system, there was no microbial response to MMHg additions and no broad-spectrum Hg-resistant bacteria were isolated from the water column after a week of exposure to 2 p"g' L-l of this organometal t821.
3. BIOMETHYLATION OF MERCURY
In more than 30 years of environmental studies on the biogeochemical cycle of Hg, there are still many unsolved questions on MMHg bio- synthesis. It is not clear whether MMHg synthesis is an enzymatic process or just a chemical reaction with methylcobalamin or whether the vitamin B, producers are the only candidates for methylating Hg. We do not know if bacteria first produce dimethylmercury (DMHg) which is instantly degraded to MMHg or whether DMHg is the final product of methylation. DMHg may possibly be a mechanism of Hg detoxifrcation. The importance of environmental parameters in Hg
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 227
methylation is unclear as are the relative weights of abiotic and biolog- ical methylation. To answer all these questions and others, a key point is to determine MMHg and DMHg and other related Hg species specifi- cally and accurately.
Recent methodologies based on derivatization of inorganic and organic Hg to volatile compounds by reaction with reduced boron com- pounds and their determination at picomole levels by gas chromatogra- phy in line with atomic fluorescence spectrophometry [89,90], atomic absorption spectrophotometry [91], or Fourier transform infrared spec- troscopy [92,93] brought the presence of DMHg in the environment back to the attention ofresearchers. So until the 1990s, except in spo- radic papers, the only organic Hg species reported in the environment was MMHg.
In the past, MMHg concentrations in sediments, microbial cul- tures, and other matrices were overestimated owing to analytical arte- facts related to the low reliability of methods for extracting MMHg from complex matrices such as sediments, microbial cultures, and others [94]. For example, the additions of natural thiols, coenz5rme M, methanethiol, dimethylsulfide, and halomethane to bacterial cultures caused an increase of solvent-extractable Hg, but it was not MMHg [93]. To understand the role of microorganisms in MMHg synthesis from several decades of studies, it is important to consider not only the different analytical techniques but also the different protocols, which may include additions of vitamin B, or similar congener. Bacteria were often "forced" to produce MMHg by adding methyl donors, so that it was often impossible to distinguish biological activity from chemical reactions.
From a historical point of view, MMHg and DMHg of natural origin were first determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrome- try (GC-MS) analysis in aquarium sludge and in rotten fish spiked with HgClr. Both organomercurials were found after 4 and 7 weeks of incu- bation under anaerobic conditions, suggesting that Hg2+ alkylation may have a bacterial origin and that anaerobic conditions could effect this reaction [95]. MMHg and DMHg were also determined by thin layer chromatography (TLC) in cell-free extract of a methanogenic strain, MOH, isolated from symbiotic mixed cultures in a canal mud from Delft, Holland [96]. In the organomercurial synthesis test of Hgz+, the cofactor methylcobalamin (CH.-Co(III)-5,6-dimethyl benzimid-
228
BALDI
azolyl-cobamide) was added to cell-free extract, which is a good sub- strate for methanogenesis. Inorganic Hg inhibited methane production, reduced vitamin Bu to Brr., and produced the two alkylated forms, MMHg and DMHg. This rapid conversion suggested that methyl group transfer from co3+ to Hg2+ could be nonenzymatic (trans-alkylation). A few years later, Imura et al. [97] demonstrated that Hgz+ could be methylated chemically by methylcobalamin in a few hours, at BZ.c in the dark, under mild reducing conditions, and in the absence of cell extract. DMHg and MMHg were detected with silica gel thin layer in a three-solvent system. It was suggested that the initial product of this reaction was DMHg for equimolar quantities of Hgclr. DMHg was then
converted to MMHg by further action of HgClr, as follows [92]: 2CHs-Bu + HgCl, ___> (CHr)rHg
(CHr)rHg + HgCl, ---> 2CHrHgCl
since the demonstration that inorganic Hg was chemically meth- ylated to MMHg and DMHg, it was generally accepted to convert DMHg to MMHg for routine analysis by gas chromatography equipped with electron capture detector (GC-ECD) [gg,99]. This derivatizatìon proce_ dure was welcomed because of the high volatility of DMHg and to avoid its possible decomposition in the GC column. so the tw-o organomer- curials were treated with inorganic acids and DMHg conrreried quan-
titatively to MMHg. This analytical simplification arù became popular among chemists, engineers, biologists, and other scientists interested in Hg pollution; however, the cycle of Hg was lacking information on Hg mobilization and reduction in Hg toxicity.
3.1. Biosynthesis of Monomethylmercury
From the 1970s, studies of the transformation of inorganic Hg to MMHg flourished in many environmentar laboratories. Many ref,orts dealt with MMHg synthesis in pure cultures t100_1041 and it seemed that both prokaryotes and eukaryotes could methylate Hgz+. This synthesis was increased by the addition of vitamin B, to the curture íedium.
vitamin Brr, in its methylated form, was therefore considered the main substrate for MMHg synthesis. This growth factor is known to be pro_ duced copiously by aerobic and anaerobic microbes: pseudomonos d.eni-
(1)
e)
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 229
trificans [105,106], Rhodospirillum rubrum [I07], Salmonella typhi- murium [108], Escft.erichia coli ft091, Propionibacterium shermanii ILIO), Eubacterium limosum [111], methanogens [112-115], acetogenic bacteria [116], clostridia [49,117] and sulfate-reducing bacteria [118].
In one of the first studies under laboratory conditions, MMHg production was determined in cultures of gram-positive and gram- negative species (Pseudomonas fluorescens, Mycobacteriurn phlei, Ba- cillus megaterium, E. coli, andAerobacter aerogenes) and fungal species (Aspergillus niger, Scopulariopsis breuicaulis) 1702). MMHg was deter- mined by GC-ECD in experiments with and without vitamin Brr. Small amounts of MMHg were formed by all bacteria on addition of vitamin B',. All three fungal species methylated Hg. When Dl-methionine was added to the medium, the fungi were more sensitive to HgClr. No significant increase in MMHg concentrations was detected inA. niger in the presence of 10 Fg.ml,-t HgClr.
Alternative Hg methylation with vitamin B, were tested. For example, Hg methylation was studied in Ne urospord crassa on the basis of methionine production [119], since Hg tolerance was associated with the methionine synthesis loci in a Staphylococcus strain [120]. In N. crasscr., methionine was found to increase toxicity in the presence of HgCl, but not MMHg production. The fungus could tolerate MMHg toxicity in the presence of other methyl donors like choline and betaine. MMHg increases were found in cultures by adding amino acids such as Dl-homocysteine and Dl-homoserine. In these experiments, MMHg was determined only by the GC-ECD technique. No other specific ana- lytical methods were used. The production of MMHg during methionine synthesis has not yet been confirmed in other biological systems. Since this experiment, many investigators have unsuccessfully used DL- homocysteine in pure cultures to improve MMHg synthesis through the S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) pathway. SAM is another important
methyl donor with potential methylation for Hg2+; however, Hg meth- ylation did not take place with this compound in a yeast strain of Saccharomyces cereuisiae, a good SAM producer [121] . In some bacterial species, we cannot exclude the indirect involvement of other methyl donors in the enhancement of Hg methylation in certain environments.
For more than 15 years, it was generally accepted that the meth- ylation of Hg was performed by prokaryotes in aerobic and anaerobic environments. Until compeau and Bartha [122] demonstrated that
230 BALDI
MMHg was synthesized in anoxic estuarine sediments (-220mV), sulfate-reducingbacteria were suspected to be the main bacterial group involved in MMHg biosynthesis in situ [123], although it has been proved for years that the presence of sulfides inhibited this process in soil, sediment, and bacterial cultures 1122,124-1261.
The principal experiment that demonstrated the effrciency of sul- fate reducers in Hg methylation was performed with slurries of salt marsh sediments incubated in an anaerobic chamber [123] by spiking 75 pg'ml,-r of HgCl, into the system. Experiments for inhibition or enhancement of MMHg synthesis were carried out by adding different organic sources: pyruvate, acetate, and lactate, which stimulated three- fold more MMHg synthesis than glucose. The addition of BESA, a specific inhibitor of methanogenesis, significantly increased MMHg synthesis in 10 days. Conversely, additions of molybdate, a specific inhibitor of methanogenesis and sulfate-reduction, suppressed MMHg synthesis (Fig. 3). This experiment showed that sulfate reducers were the predominant, if not exclusive, Hg methylators in this environment. Potential Hg methylation was fully expressed only when sulfate was limiting and carbon sources were available at low salinity. However, one strain that methylated Hg better at 0.5 M than at 0.2 M of chloride was isolated from a high-salinity enrichment culture [127].
MMHg synthesis by D. desulfuricans, isolated from salt marsh sediments [123], was studied by following the biosynthesis of the amino acids serine and glycine with radiolabeled l3-laClsodium pyruvate 11281. A frnal methylene group transported by N5,N10-methylene- tetrahydrofolate (THF) was converted to a methyl group and was then transferred to vitamin B,, [118], which finally methylated Hg2*. The role of cobalamins in MMHg synthesis was again confirmed to be funda- mental, and they are still the only compounds known to transfer the carbanion (CH;) to Hg2+ [129-1311.
3.2. Mercury Methylation in the Environment
One of the first determinations of MMHg in the environment was performed at the time of the trial between Japanese civil authorities and the Chisso factory at Minamata 11321. The dispute centered on whether the MMHg in the bay was of industrial origin or naturally
r-
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 231
0246810
Timc (daYs)
FIG. 3. Synthesis of MMHg in anoxic estuarine sediment slurry spiked with Hgz* at 75 p,g. g-t (dw) (o) and the effects on the process of 30 mM BESA (.) and 20 mM NarMoOa (t), specific inhibitors of methanogenesis, and sulfate reduction, respeitively. Error bars represent the range ofvalues in duplicate samples and are omitted when smaller than the symbols. (Reproduced with permission from [123].)
biosynthesized by microbes. The defense held that it has been demon- strated that in Sweden, bacteria could methylate Hg [95]. When high concentrations of MMHg were found in the industrial effiuent in 1971 t1331, the authorities closed the industrial plant. It was estimated that this industry dumped about 4.1tons of MMHg out of 82 tons of total Hg through the Hyakken outlet from 1932 to 1971 [132,134].
After subsequent incidents as occurred in Iraq [135-137]' MMHg was banned everywhere, and today its concentration in the environ- ment is generally of natural origin. It was identified in estuarine sedi- ments from the Mississippi Delta [99]. Hg methylation was also studied in situ in estuarine sediments from San Francisco Bay [138]' High con- centrations of HgCl, were spiked in natural shallow and deep sedi- ments, and MMHg was detected after 0, 18, and 28 days. This experi-
232
BALDI
ment led to the hypothesis that MMHg was biosynthesized in sedi- ments but also degraded by bacteria (demethylation). The totai concen- tration of MMHg in the sediments would therefore be the resultant between the methylation/demethylation rate. This difference between the Hg methylation/demethylation process in the oxic/anoxic zone was well demonstrated in further reports [88,139-143]. The inducible growth of aerobic bacteria which degrade MMHg is likely to occur in aerobic sediments, when the concentration of this organomercurial reaches the threshold value for induction of organomercurial lyase synthesis in broad-spectrum Hg-resistant bacteria. In general, it has been estimated that an average of LÙvo of plasmids confer resistance to organic mercury in aerobic bacteria populations [81]. However, this conventional percentage can be nil or higher than 10 depending on the
bioavailable MMHg in the ecosystem [82,88].
Most of the studies on Hg methylation in situ have been performed
in the northern hemisphere where MMHg is unexplainably high in fish [144-1471in the absence of local contamination. The low concentrations of Hg are probably from emissions of fossil fuel plants and subsequent condensation in cold areas ofnorthern Europe, northern united states, and canada [148-150]. since fish living in lakes of these regions contain high concentrations of MMHg, there is much interest in the origin of
MMHg in these environments.
Mercury methylation is generally studied in situ in the water
column, sediments, and surface aggregates by radiochemical tech- niques. For example, high production of MMHg by sediment-floc in non-mercury-contaminated lakes was about 10 times faster than in Hg- contaminated lakes [151]. This confirms that the absence of the non- induced broad-spectrum Hg-resistant bacteria in pristine areas leads to the formation of more MMHg than in Hg-polluted areas where MMHg degradation is induced.
Microbial Hg methylation in the environment does not depend only on redox potential but also on several other parameters such as pH, temperature, and nutrients. The importance of pH on MMHg for- mation seems restricted mainly to freshwater systems adjacent to in- dustrialized areas in North America and northern Europe where most of the water basins have a low pH owing to acid depositions and high concentrations of humic substances. An increase in Hg methylation in the water column was observed, for example, in the Canadian Shield
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 233
lakes when the water was acidic [142]. MMHg formation in the fresh- water environment is stimulated at the water-sediment interface in lakes at low pH and possibly also in the aerobic water column. Lowering the pH at the aerobic/anaerobic sedimenVwater interface resulted in a two- to threefold increase in the rate of MMHg production [142,152]. The effect of pH on Hg methylation may differ between lakes with aerobic waters; for instance, MMHg production was greater in the epilimnetic water of Little Rock Lake (Wisconsin) at pH 6.1than in an artificiallly acidified aerobic basin at pH 4.7 [142]. However, sometimes the immobilization of Hg by sulfides, which was probably the reason for the decreased rates of Hg methylation in some acidified subsurface sediments, cannot be excluded [153-155].
An additional phenomenon correlated with low pH was the release of MMHg from the sediment surface. The behavior of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which binds Hg2+, DaY be an additional factor that contributes to Hg methylation in the water column of acidified lakes. One of the effects of lake acidification on DOC is its sedimentation as DOC- aluminum complexes from the water column [156-158]. The precipita- tion of DOC and thus the loss of Hg-binding sites might also explain the stimulation of free Hg methylation in the water column. Thus, acidifica- tion reduces the metal binding efficiency of DOC and stimulates water column methylation of more available inorganic mercury.
The influence of temperature on MMHg biosynthesis was studied in sediment and water of the upper Wisconsin River [139]. It was found that the top 4 cm of sediment exhibited the greatest Hg methyla- tion activity, especially in a site significantly enriched with total Hg, whereas in the water column, methylation was almost undetectable' Mercury methylation was higher at an optimum temperature of 35'C under laboratory conditions, and it was stimulated by addition of pro- tein hydrolysates and anoxic conditions [139]. The low temperatures in the northern hemisphere do not favor microbial activity or Hg methyla- tion. This suggested that MMHg can be of abiotic origin; at least in the coldest periods of the year when the temperature is far from the optimal microbial growth. Studies of Hg methylation by psychrophilic bacteria have not yet been performed. So the main abiotic sources of MMHg in these ecosytems are probably humic substances [].59,1601 and/or rains
[161-163].
With regard to the influence of nutrient additions in controlling
234 BALDI
methylation of Hg, it has been found in situ that additions of tryptic-soy broth to sediments increased Hg methylation [151]. In natural systems, nutrients for bacteria are from periodic resuspension of the sediment and plankton debris. In the most polluted sites in the Wisconsin lakes, the highest Hg methylation yield is reached late in summer because of the high organic matter content when the river is low [139]. The high concentration of DOC in lakes often coincides with an increase in MMHg, mainly in the particulate organic matter [143]. The addition of different nutrients, especially pyruvate, to salt marsh sediments in- creased Hg methylation at least threefold t1231.
All these parameters-redox potential, pH, temperature, enzy- matic demethylation, and nutrients-play an important role in MMHg mass balance in an ecosystem. In one lake, low pH may be important in stimulating Hg methylation, whereas in another, the decomposition of newly flood-borne organic material or more anaerobic conditions are more important ft42). The biological origin of MMHg is difficult to differentiate from abiotic formation, especially in cold freshwater envi- ronments. The demethylation of MMHg to Hg(0) and CH, is of biolog- ical origin and occurs mainly at the oxic/anoxic interface, at mild tem- peratures, and with a good supply of nutrients. However, in other habitats, the double methylation of Hg (dimethylation) to DMHg seems to prevail over monomethylation.
3.3. Dimethylmercury Biosynthesis: The Final Product of Mercury Methylation
For 30 years, there was little interest in DMHg [95-97,122,164] for lack of a routine analytical method for its determination and because this species was considered a mere by-product of MMHg formation. It was recently demonstrated [131] that methylcobalamin, the only compound permitting methylation of inorganic Hg, produced DMHg as the final product and not MMHg as it was previously suggested [97,98,126].
A specific analytical approach was proposed to measure alkyl-Hg forms simultaneously by purge-and-trap gas chromatography in line with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (PT-GC-FTIR) [1311. The determination was performed in sealed vessels to avoid losses due to
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 235
the rapid volatilization of DMHg. The new technique provided impor- tant new information:
1. DMHg was the final organic Hg species in the reaction be- tween methylcobalamin and ionic Hg. MMHgwas formed first and then transformed to DMHg.
2. The mono- and dimethylation of Hg depended on the tempera- ture according to the Arrhenius equations:
143.5
ln(MMHg.) = 6.161 - T (3)
R2 = 0.997
ln(DMHg.) = 2.758 -
R2 = 0.944
7r.34
(4)
where MMHg, is the methylation rate and DMHg" is the double meth- ylation rate of Hg and the temperature, I in 'C.
3. The second methylation step for MMHg, either formed in solu- tion or spiked into the system, was as fast as the first methylation step. The alkylation rate of CHrHgCl to give DMHgwas calculated at 20 and 37'C and is expressed by the following equation:
ln (DMHg.) = 6.431 - t46.9 (ol T
4. The reaction of methylcobalamin with different inorganic Hg salts (vitamin: Hg ratio 10:1) showed that for Hg salts with a higher ionic component of the Hg bond, such as in HgSOn, DMHg formed more rapidly than with halogenated salts (HgCl, and HgIr) that have a higher covalent component.
5. The high volatility of DMHg necessitated a suitable sampling for gaseous compounds [1311. During analysis, 25Vo of DMHg was lost during sample transfer from the reaction vial to the purging vessel of the PT-GC-FTIR apparatus.
The formation of DMHg was demonstrated in axenic cultures of D. desulfuricans strain LS, which is known to synthetize both vitamin B, and MMHg, after additions of Hg2+, during fermentation [118]. This strain also formed DMHg from added MMHg but by a different path-
236 BALDI
way. Experiments carried out with the sulfate-reducer strain LS dem- onstrated the disappearance of MMHg from the cultures with HrS production from the dissimulative reduction of sulfates. However, it was previously observed that chemical additions of HrS made MMHg volatile [165] and led to the formation of white crystals which were identified as dimethylmercury sulfide (DMHgS; i.e., CHrHg-S-HgCHr) [166]. In time, the crystals turned from white to black; in this secondary reaction, the volatile DMHg and solid metacinnabar (B-HgS) formed.
Under laboratory conditions, active cells ofD. desulfuricans strain LS cultured in Postgate medium with sulfate immediately produced DMHgS from MMHg additions (100 pg'ml,-r). An authentic standard was not used to identify it, but the chemical species identification was based on the mass spectra from molecular fragmentation (mass/charge ntio [m I z)). The fragments were: m / z = 47 for [CHs - S] +, m / z = 202 for [Hgi *, m / z = 217 for [CHrHg] +, m / z = 249 for [CHr-Hg- S]+, m / z = 264 for [CH, - Hg- S - CH3l +, and, m / z = 464 for [CH, - Hg- S - Hg- CHrl +. The mass/charge ratios of various peaks identifred this species as DMHgS (Fig. a). DMHgS was determined by GC-MS after chloroform extraction from culture suspensions [54]. The formation of DMHg from MMHg and then from DMHgS was monitored for 15 days of incubation of strain LS. During this period, B-HgS was also formed, precipitating in the cultures. Tbansformation of MMHg to DMHg and F-HgS occurs as follows:
2MMHg + H2S -+ [DMHgSl -+ DMHg + B-HgS (6)
During reaction (6), traces of CHn formed, probably by further degradation of DMHg due to the weakly acid conditions (pH = 6.2) in the bacterial culture [54].
Degradation of MMHg by HrS from sulfate-reducing bacteria was also reproducible in sediments. MMHg spiked into anoxic marine sedi- ments was also transformed into DMHg, although the intermediate form, DMHgS, was not found. A method to extract DMHgS species from complex matrices still has to be developed. As in axenic cultures of D. desulfuricans, MMHg disappeared from anaerobic sediments with the evolution of DMHg. This transformation was of microbial origin, be- cause DMHg was not significantly produced after sediments were treated with molybdate, a strong inhibitor of sulfate-reducing bacteria Í58,1221. The transformation of MMHg to DMHg was followed in 8-day experiments in the same anoxic sediments spiked with 10 pg of CH,HgCl.
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 237 Abundanc!
4000
0
10 12 14 Time (min)
MaslCharge
FIG. 4. Mass spectrum of dimethylmercury sulfide (DMHgS) extracted with chloroform from a culture of D. desulfuricans strain LS. The relative retention time (top) and the abundance of molecular fragmentation (bottom) are shown. (Reproduced with permission from [54].)
The disappearance of MMHg was complementary to the formation of DMHg in the sediments (Fig. 5).
In the light ofthe biotransformation of MMHgby HrS, the workby Pan-Hu et al. [53] suggests that C. cochlearium strain T-2P probably has a similar mechanism of detoxification' In this strain, MMHg- degradation activity is harbored in a conjugative plasmid together with HrS production. The strain T-2P was thought to split the C-Hg bond of MMHg; however, no loss of volatile Hg from the medium was found, because it was presumed that the volatile inorganic Hg reacted with HrS to produce HgS [167J. Conversely, the C. cochlearium-cured strain T-2C lost both the ability to degrade MMHg and to produce HrS, and it became sensitive to mercurials, acquiring the capacity to produce MMHg from HgCl, in the absence of vitamin B, or otherwise. Hence,
238
BALDI
fo 40O
02468
Time (days)
FIG. 5. Kinetic studies in anoxic sediment samples from Pialasse di Ravenna, polluted many ypars ago with MMHg from an acetaldehyde factory similar to lhut of Mi.rumata Bay, demonstrate that still today, sediment incubated for 9 days at 28"C and spiked with 10 pg of CHrHgCl converts this to DMHg (A), whereas MMHg (A) disappears. (Reproduced with permission from [58].)
there is a further affinity between C. cochlearium T-2C and D' de' sulfuricans strain LS. When the latter is grown in a fermentative mode, it also produces MMHg by the vitamin B12 pathway [118]. These sim- ilarities between c. cochlearium and D. desulfuricans stggest that
Clostrid.ium probably also transforms MMHg to DMHg by HrS evolu- tion. It will be interesting to determine the MMHg tolerance in other bacteria which produce HrS by secondary metabolism.
The dimethylation of inorganic Hg to DMHg is one of the best mechanisms of Hg tolerance, since DMHg is more volatile than Hg(O) formed by the flavoenzyme mercuric reductase. DMHg forms outside the cell in concomitance with HrS evolution. Unlike MMHg, it did not accumulate in D. desulfuricans cells [54] or in the cells of the broad- spectrum Hg-resistant Pseudomonas putida strain FB1 when the wild
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 239
strain FBl and the cured strain FB6 were exposed for 3 h to 5 pg'ml,-r of DMHg (Fig. 6A). Conversely, MMHg (1 pg'ml,-l) rapidly accumu- lated in the cured strain FB6. The wild strain FBl seemed unable to degrade DMHg in vivo, but degraded MMHg to Hg(0) (Fig. 6B). The nondegradability of DMHg in vivo may have been due to the fact that this Hg compound did not interact with the cells because of its high volatility. Experiments to demonstrate DMHg degradation by cell-free extracts are necessary.
During this decade, the interest in DMHg distribution in the environment has coincided with the development of new specific and sensitive routine determination methods. DMHg was first found at femtomolar levels (max = 555 -l- 154 fM, n-3) in subthermocline equa- torials waters (>200 m) of the Pacific Ocean, and it was inversely correlated with dissolved o, [168J. Then DMHg was also found ranging from 10 fM to 0.31 pM in deep waters of the North Atlantic ocean between Greenland and Norway and around Iceland. The highest DMHg concentrations were found in the deepest waters at most sta- tions [70]. The presence of this Hg species in deep ocean waters could be the result of an in situ production or advective transport from other zones; modeling calculation favor the former hypothesis [70]. The pro- duction of sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria is probably the only
cause known so far of DMHg formation in the ocean depths and also in more oxygenated waters but where sulfides still occur t1691. DMHg formation can therefore occur under suboxic/oxic conditions as sug- gested by laboratory studies [95,96,123]. In the Mediterranean Sea (Alboran Sea and Strait of Gibraltar), DMHg has also been detected in oxygenated subthermocline waters, where oxygen concentrations were above 150 rrM [170].
DMHg formation in sediments was first studied in a mangrove ecosystem at sepetiba Bay, Brazil [171]. These sediments were contami- nated by man-made effluents containing high concentrations of sn and Hg. High concentrations (211 ng' g-1 to 233 ng'g-1 dw) of DMHg were found in sediment cores at a depth of 10 cm, with a minimum value at 30- to 40-cm depth. These concentrations were several orders of magni- tude higher than in ocean waters. High concentrations of humic sub- stances presumably stabilize and sequester DMHg in mangrove sedi- ments tÚll;high concentrations of sulfate and an optimal temperature range for microbial growth would also have facilitated DMHg formation
240
BALDI
l (x)
^80
:o 60 è
5. 40 è!
0
B
o0<
0
60 90 r20 150 180 Time (min)
Ì:lu oo
A+ì-.--
'I'inrc (nrin)
FIG. 6. (A) Accumulation of organomercurials in a wild strain FBI (o, o) of broad-spectrum Hg-resistant Pseudomonas putida and the respective cured strain FB6 (o, l) after exposure for 3 h at 28"C to 1 pg.mL-1 CHrHgCl (o, o), and 5 pg'mL-1 of (CHs)zHg (r, .). Total Hg was determined by atomic absorp- tion spectrometry (AAS) by previous mineralization and atomization of Hg in the samples. (B) Volatilization as Hg(O) from cultures of a wild strain FB1 (o, o) of broad-spectrum Hg-resistant Pseudomonas putid.a and the respective cured strain FB6 (D, r) after exposure for 70 min at room temperature to 1pg.ml,-t CHrHgCl (o, o), and 5 pg'ml-t of (CHr)rHg (r, r). Hg(0) concentrations were calculated on the basis of the relative pressure at a given temperature with respect to elemental Hg(0) standard injected into the atomization cell of AAS.
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 241
in this environment. This process was of course attributed to the reac- tion with free sulfides but also to a mechanism of trans-alkylation due to high concentrations of methylated tin forms (mono-, di-, and tri- methyltin). Monomethylation of inorganic Hg by methyltin was known [172], but double methylation (dimethylation) of Hg, although likely, has yet to be proven.
The formation of DMHg from MMHg was recently reported in salt marsh sediments from Marina di Ravenna, Italy [58], and floodplain soil of the Elbe River, Germany, containing low concentrations of MMHg. In this experiment, Hg(0) was also determined in the degassed soil samples together with DMHg [173]. These two volatile Hg species were easily purged from soil with Nr. A total of 1.4 ng'g-1 (dw) of DMHg was released from the soil suspensions. Sulfide additions to the soil rapidly produced new DMHg even at sulfide additions as low as 1.5 mg'g-1 from which no DMHg evolution was detectable by chemical reaction [174]. In the future, DMHg will be determined in many other environments, and its importance in the cycle of Hg will probably be reconsidered.
The only ecosystems in which DMHg has been analyzed but not detected so far are the freshwater environments of acid lakes in North America and northern Europe. MMHg is the only organomercurial found in such ecosystems. This is probably explained by (1) acid condi- tions which favor MMHg stability [70,96], (2) low concentration of sulfate as electron acceptor for sulfate reducing bacteria, and (3) the mainly abiotic origin of MMHg in these lakes.
4. THE ROLE OF METACINNABAR. THE MOST STABLE MERCURY SPECIES
Mercury sulfide (HgS) occurs in nature as red-hexagonal (a-form, cin- nabar) or black cubic crystals (B-form, metacinnabar). The latter are mainly produced by microbial activity with evolution of HrS with Hg compounds. HgS is very stable and is conserved naturally in the Hg reserve pool of the Earth, where its turnover is in terms of millions of years. Natural events such as new volcanic and geothermal activities, metamorphogenesis, and the mining of cinnabar deposits, free Hg from sulfides so that it enters the Hg exchangeable pool.
242
BALDI
HgS is stable in most reducing environments. The extreme insolu- bility of HgS may be increased under very reducing conditions by con- version of Hg ions to Hg(O) or by the formation of the more stable HgSS- ion at high pH Í67 ,175,1761. The release of Hg from HgS may occur via a complex mechanism depending on a positive redox potential, low pH, and high concentrations of Cl- t671.
The reaction of inorganic Hg2+ with HrS is immediate and is the main cause of Hg loss from the water column under anoxic conditions [100,101,122,124-t261. HgS should precipitate immediately because of its high density (d = 7.67), but under laboratory conditions in the presence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, the reaction between Hgz+ and HrS takes place in a floating aggregate formed by a polysaccharide *àt"i" with embedded bacteria and newly formed microcrystals of HgS
[177]. Heavier crystals later leave the polysaccharide envelope under the effect of gravity. under the light microscope, the microbial aggre- gate has areas of different density. The high density to light is due to crystals and the lower density to bacteria.
The environmental meaning of this laboratory experiment is that the biological reaction between free inorganic Hg and free sulfides occurs in a naturally controlled system (exudated polysaccharide floc) produced by microbes in which sulfides from anaerobic respiration are retained in this microhabitat t1781. The reaction is more efficient than in aqueous solutions from which Hrs degasses at a higher rate. In the controlled system ofpolysaccharide aggregate, this reaction takes place with less gas diffusion and Hgs precipitation becomes possible even in suboxic anÙor oxic conditions.
The polysaccharide floc exuded by sulfate-reducing bacteria pro- vides an optimal crystallization site owing to hyperconcentrations of Hg2*, H*, and 52- which may be complexed by active sites of polysac- charides [179]. The formation of Hgs crystals by sulfide activity is produced both from inorganic Hg but also from MMHg as already reported t5al. MMHg is first precipitated as DMHgS, but in a second- ary step, when DMHg degasses, F-HgS is the most stable form of Hg as shown by x-ray spectra with relative intensity peaks at 26"35',30"55"
43"75', and 51"80' (x-ray diffractometry analysis) of dry cell pellets. The latter was obtained by centrifuging D. desulfuricans cultures spiked with 100 pg' ml,-l of Hg in two separated bottles (cap' 1L) spiked with HgCl, and CHrHgCl additions after 15 days of incubation at28C (Fig. 7).
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 243
51" 80' 43" 75' 30" 55' 26" 35',
FIG. 7. Spectra of p-HgS (metacinnabar) obtained by x-ray diffractometry with the highest peak of the relative intensity (1007o) at 26'35' theta and the minor ones. Spectrum A is B-HgS (from MMHg transformation by 1 liter of a D. desulfuricans strain LS culture spiked with 100 [rB.ml.-t of CHrHgCl and incubated at 28"C for 15 days) ofthe solid acid-insoluble residue after centrifu- gation of cell suspension (10.7 mg.L-t). Spectrum B is B-HgS (from a culture of D. desulfuricons strain LS spiked with HgCl, [100 p.g.mL 1] incubated at 28"C for 15 days) ofthe solid acid-insoluble residue after centrifugation ofcell suspen- sion (97.4 mg.L-t).
Although HgS is the most stable species of Hg, it is reported that traces of bioavailable Hgz+ can be removed from this sulfide into sedi- ments where they are accumulated by fish t1801. A Hg-resistant Thio- bacillus fenoxidans strain has been found to produce Hg(O) enzymati- cally from red cinnabar mixed with pyrite (1:10 w:w), but it could not grow chemolithotrophically on this sulfide as enerry source t781. A Hg- sensitive T. ferroxidazs strain could not grow on pyrite mixed with red cinnabar. This suggests that probably there was a concentration offree inorganic Hg on the crystals; otherwise the toxicity of cinnabar and Hg(O) degassing cannot be explained [781. When metal sulfides, an anaerobic product, are exposed to air, they may react with oxygen to produce Hg oxides and,/or sulfates on the surface. For example, we cannot exclude that some types of HgS are more reactive than others, like reactive pyrite (FeSo) [181], called also "fireballs", which can be set
244 BALDI
on fire because of rapid natural oxidation [182]. Halogens such as Cl- can facilitate the removal of Hg from HgS in marine systems [67].
5. NEW VIEW OF THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF MERCURY
The role of microrganisms in the cycle of Hg is known as outlined above, but it is still underestimated. A large part of the Hg cycle is undoubtedly dominated by microbial activity in aquatic and terrestrial environ- ments. Here we have described the capacity of microorganisms to adapt to Hg pollution and to transform toxic Hg species to harmless ones. Microbes control Hg toxicity by maintaining homeostatic subtoxic levels not only in the cell cytoplasm but also in the surrounding environ- ment, which sooner or later leads to detoxification of the polluted site. Understanding of the Hg cycle in some historical polluted areas by industry is possible in the light of microbial reactions under anaerobic conditions.
For example, why did the Minamata disease develop only in Japan and not in other parts of the world, such as Italy, where similar indus- tries were located? The Minamata disease was diagnosed by Dr. Hoso- kawa (Director of Minamata Factory Hospital) in May 1956. The first case in the Minamata district appeared in 1953. In 1959, the disease was recognized to be of epidemic proportions among fishermen and their families [132]. The epidemic had its origin in 1932, when the Shin- Nihon Chisso Hyno Co. began to use HgCl, and HgSOn as a catalyst to produce acetaldehyde and vinyl chloride [133] and to dump its effiuent in the bay. The factory was not closed down until 1971. Further alkyl Hg contamination was found at Niigata, where a similar factory of the Showa Denko Co. was discharging MMHg into the Agano River. Many more cases of the Minamata disease were added to the previous list. In 1988, 1750 cases of Minamata sSmdrome were certified of 12 336 persons who applied for certification [134]. Officially, 750 people died of this environmental disease [183].
At that time, several factories in other parts of the world were producing acetaldehyde from acetylene using inorganic Hg as catalyst. At least two factories using the same process were known in Europe: the
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 245
ANIC factory at Marina di Ravenna, Italy, and the Huls factory at Marl, Germany. Not many people are aware that a similar ecological disaster could also have occurred in Europe. The Italian case was studied com- paratively by Professor Ui from Tokyo University, who studied also the epidemic at Niigata. Fortunately, no clinical cases were observed in Italian fishermen, who were eating 3-4 kg of fish per week, at Marina di Ravenna and "the rumor of suicide cats was not heard" [132] . This was because the Italian fishermen did not eat the local fish, except eels, because it smelled of oil from nearby raffineries that discharged wastes in the same area as the acetaldehyde factory. This area is characterized by a semiclosed marsh area consisting of branched channels of shallow water and anoxic sediments, which can reach a temperature as high as 34"C at 8 a.m.
If a comparison between the geography of Minamata Bay and the Pialasse (salt marsh) at Marina di Ravenna is made [132,184]' it emerges that in Japan, MMHg was discharged in the bay where fisher- men caught their food, whereas in Italy, the industry discharged into an anoxic marsh, with very limited exchange with the open sea [185]. Today at Marina di Ravenna, the concentrations of total Hg are still enormously high, although industrial activity stopped several years ago. In the first 10 cm of sediments of the most polluted site, there is an average level of 400 pg'g-t (dw). This concentration is by far higher than in Minamata Bay, where sediments with concentrations above 25
pg. g I (dw) have now been removed, transported elsewhere, and mixed
with soil [134,186].
At Pialasse di Ravenna, a concentration of 1000 pg'g-1 of total Hg
was reached at a depth of 80 cm in a sediment core [185]. However, no "Minamata" cases have been observed so far. The explanation for this discrepancy between Japan and Italy is that the toxic MMHg was rapidly converted to the harmless species DMHg and HgS in the anoxic marsh. This was demonstrated, as reported above (Sec. 3.3), by adding MMHg to this polluted sediment (see Fig. 5). This sediment sample contained 0.1 pg'g-r (0.016Vo) of MMHg versus 600 pg'g-t of total Hg
[58]. The environmental conditions of Pialasse favor sulfate-reducing bacteria which produce HrS, because the sediments and waters are anoxic and the temperature is warm enough to transform the toxic MMHg to DMHg and HgS rapidly. So the Minamata disease did not break out at Marina di Ravenna because MMHg was converted to
246
BALDI
(CH3)2Hg
,;;i i:,r,Hg 'i ' ,,,i *g Àlr*iun.;oiii
FIG. 8. The biochemical cycle of Hg. Under aerobic conditions, inorganic Hg can (1) be reduced by Hg-resistant bacteria to the volatile Hg(0) if the Hg concentration exceeds the threshold for Hg induction of t}:'e mer operon; (2) accumulate in the food chain; (3) be complexed to dissolved organic matter (DOC); (4) be adsorbed on particulate organic matter (POC) in the water column in the oxic/anoxic zone; (5) be transformed to methylmercury (MMHg) and its concentrations are the result of microbial methylation/demethylation pro- cesses. (6) MMHg can be accumulated faster than Hg2+ itr the food chain or sequestered by POC and DOC.-Under anoxic conditions in the presence of HrS from microbial dissimulative reduction of sulfate: (7)Hgz* precipitates as solid metacinnabar (p-HgS), (8) MMHg is converted to the instable dimethylmercury sulfide (DMHgS, CH,Hg-S-HgCH3); (9) this species transforms into volatile dimethylmercury (DMHg) and solid p-HgS; (10) DMHg degrades under mild acid conditions to CHn and (11) some free Hg2+ may be volatilized to Hg(O) by nonspecific reducing agents of microbial origin.
AIR
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 247
harmless species. Of course, the fact of local oil-smelly fish also pro- tected the population from a catastrophe. Eels contained at that time relative low concentrations of MMHg (from 0.1to 6.37 pg.g-r, fw) in comparison with other predators caught at Minamata Bay t1321. If MMHg would have been discharged by the ANIC factory directly into the sea, as in the case of the Chisso factory at Minamata, severe con- tamination of the open costal waters sediments and biota could be expected. In the 1970s, fish caught offshore in the shallow waters ofthe Adriatic Sea showed low total Hg concentrations in muscle tissues ranging from 0.05 to 0.3 pg'g-1 (fw) for anchovies (Engraulis en- crasiculus) and sardines (Sardina pilchardus). These concentrations were lower than those of the same species caught from the T\'rrhenian Sea, which was polluted by Hg from the weathering of a cinnabar mine tailing and slightly higher than those of fish from the Atlantic Ocean [187]. The aquatic marsh system of Pialasse di Ravenna, therefore, functioned as a barrier for MMHg and as a natural bioremediation site. This interpretation is based on the chemical instability of MMHg under anoxic conditions and subsequent reduction of toxicity. The cycle of Hg can be outlined as in Fig. 8. MMHg reacts with HrS to form the instable species DMHgS, which degrades to the volatile DMHg and the solid HgS. Under mild acidic conditions, DMHg can be further degraded to CH., and some inorganic Hg can be reduced to Hg(0). The only residue is HgS. These transformations probably occurred at the "Pialasse di Ravenna" but not in Minamata Bay.
ABBREVIATIONS
AAS atomic absorption spectrometry BESA 2-bromo-ethane sulfonic acid Chlo chlorophyll o
DMHg dimethylmercury
DMHgS dimethylmercury sulfide DOC dissolved organic carbon dw dry weight
fM femtomolar (= 10-15 M) fi^/ fresh weight
248
BALDI
GC-ECD gas chromatography with electron capture detector GC-MS gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
MMHg monomethylmercury
pM picomolar (= 19-tz 14;
POC particulate organic matter
PT-GC-FTIR purge-and-trap gas chromatography in line with
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy SAM S-adenosylmethionine
THF tetrahydrofolate
TLC thin layer chromatography
REFERENCES
1. B. Mason, Principles of Biochemistry, Jo}rn Wiley & Sons, New York, 1966.
2. J. C. G. Walker, Euolution of the Atmosphere, Macmillan, New York, 1977.
3. B. Moore, Lancet, 2, 453-458 (1960).
4. M. H. Richmond and M. John, Noture,202,1360-1361 (1964).
5. D. H. Smith, Science, 156, LII4-L116 (1967).
6. R. P. Novick and C. Roth, J. Bacteriol.,95, 1335-1342 (1968).
7. K. Tonomura, T. Nagakami, R. Futai, and K. Maeda, J. Ferment. Technol.. 46. 506-5L2 (1968).
8. A. Summers, J. Shottel, D. Clark, and S. Silver, in Microbiology, 1974 (D. Schlessinger, ed.), American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, 1975, pp.219-226.
9. D. L. Clark, A. A. Weiss, and S. Silver, J. Bacteriol.,732,186-196 (r977).
10. S. Silver and M. Walderhaug, Microbial Reu.,56,195-228 (1992).
11. K. Furukawa and K. Tonomura,Ag'ric. BioL Chem.,35,604-610 (1971).
12. T. Tezuka and K. Tonomura, J. Biochem.,80,79-87 (1976).
13. T. Tezuka and K. Tonomura J. Bacteriol., 735,138-143 (1978).
14. J. L. Shottel, J. BioI. Chem.,253, 434I-4349 (1978).
15. S. J. Rinderle, J. E. Booth, and J. W. Williams, Biochemistry,22, 869-873 (1983).
t
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 249
16. T. P. Begley, A.E.Walts, and C.T. Walsh, Biochemistr!,25,7186- 7191 (1986).
17. B. Fox and C. T. Walsh, J. BioI. Chem.,257,2498-2503 (1982).
18. B. Fox and C. T. Walsh, Biochemistr!,22,4082-4088 (1983).
19. T. P. Begley, A. E. Walts, and C. T. Walsh, Biochemistry,25,7I92- 7196 (1986).
20. T. O'HoIIoran and C. Walsh, Science,235,2IL-214 (1987).
2t. G. Nucifora. S. Silver, and T. K. Misra, MoI. Gen. Genet',220, 69-72 (1990).
22. V. A. Stanisich, P. M. Bennett, and M. H. Richmond,J. Bacteriol., 129, 1227-t233 (1977).
29. P. M. Bennett, J. Grinstead, C. L. Choi, and M. H. Richmond,Mol. Gen. Genet., 159,l0L-106 (1978).
24. D. A. Friello and A. M. Chakrabarty, in Plasmids and Tlans' posons: Enuironmental Effects and Mq.intenance of Mechanism (C. Stuttard and K. R. Rozee, eds.), Academic Press, New York'
1980, pp. 249-265.
25. N. L. Brown, S. J. Ford, R. D. Pridmore, and D. C. Fritzinger,
Biochemistr! , 22, 4089-4095 ( 1983).
26. T. K. Misra, N. L. Brown, L. Haberstroh, A. Schmidt, D. God-
dette, and S. Silver, Gene, 34, 253-262 (1985).
27. N. L. Brown. T. K. Misra, J. N. Winnie, A. Schmidt, M. Seiff, and
S. Silver, MoL Gen. Genet.,202,143-151 (1986).
28. F. de la Cruz and J. Grinstead,J. Bacteriol.,151,222-228 (1982).
29. J. Grinstead and N. L. Brown, MoL Gen. Genet., 197, 497-502 (1984).
30. S. Silver and T. G. Kinscherf, in Biodegradation and Detoxifica- tion of Enuironnrental Pollutants (A. M. Chakrabarty, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1982, pp. 85-103.
31. J. B. Robinson and O. H. T\rovinen, Microbial Reu.,48' 95-124 (1984).
32. A. O. Summe\ Ann. Reu. Microbiol.,40,607-634 (1986)'
33. T. J. Foster, Crit. Reu. Microbiol., 15,lll-140 (1987)'
34. A. Saxena, R. fiwari, K. K. T[ipathi, and K. G. Gupta, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 20, 67 -73 (1983).
35. H. Horitzu, M. Takagi, and M. Tomoyeda, Appl. Microbiol. Bio- technol., 5, 27 9-290 (1978).
36. T. E. Jensen, M. Baxter, J. W. Rachlin, and V Jani, Enuiron. Pollut., 27, lL9-L27 (1982).
37. J. W. Rachlin, T. E. Jensen, M. Baxter, and V Jant,Arch. Enuiron. Contam. Toxicol. , I 1, 323-333 (1982).
38. M. F. Fiore and J. î Tbevors, BioMetals, T, 83-103 (1994).
39. R. W. Olafsson, K. Abel, and R. G. Sirn, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 89, 36-43 (1979).
40. J. H. R. KàTl Methods Enzymol., 205, 6L3-626 (1991).
41. Y Kojima, Methods Enzymol.,205, 8-10 (1991).
42. J. H. R. Kiigi and B. L. Valee, J. BioI. Chem.,249, J5B7 -9542 (1960).
43. D. P. Higham and J. P. Sadler, Science, 225, 1049-1046 (1984).
44. K. Sakamoto, M. Yagasaki, K. Kirimura, and S. Usami, J. Fer- ment. Bioeng., 67, 266-273 (7989).
45. R. W Olafson, J. Biol. Chem., 256, 1263-t268 Í}Bt).
46. J. Robinson, A. Gupta, A. P Fordam-Skelton, R. R. D. Croy, B. A. Whitton, and J. W. Huckle, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 242,24t-247 (1990).
47. J.W. Huckle, A. P. Morby, J. S. Ttrrner, and N. J. Robinson, Mol. Microbiol., 7, L77 -187 (1993).
48. R. P. Mason, F. M. M. Morel, and H. F. Hemond, Water, Ai4 Soit PoIIut., 80, 77 5-787 (L995).
49. H. S. K. Pan-Hu and N. Imura, Arch. Mi.crobiol., 151, L76-l7T (1982).
50. T. Barkay and B. H. Olson, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol., 52, 409- 406 (1986).
51. J. T. Rudrik, R. E. Bawdon, and S. P. Guss, Coz. J. Microbiol.,Sl, 276-282 (L98.
52. C. W. Forsberg, Can. J. Microbiol. , 24, 298-306 (t978).
53. H. S. K. Pan-Hu, M. Hosono, and N. Imura,Appl. Enuiron. Micro- biol, 40, 1007-101I (1980).
54. F. Baldi, M. Pepi, and M. Filippelli, AppI. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 2479-2485 (1993).
55. F. Baldi and M. Filippelli, Enuiron. Sci. Technol. , 25 , 302-305 ( 1991).
56. R. S. Oremland, C. W. Culbertson, and M. R. Winfrey, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol., 57, 130-137 (1991).
BALDI
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 251
5?. R. S. Oremland, L. G. Miller, P Dowdle, T. Connell, and T. Bar- kay, AppI. E nv iron. Mic robiol., 6 l, 27 45 -27 53 (199 5).
58. F. Baldi, F. Parati, and M. Filippelli , Watet Air Soil Pollut. ' 80 ' 805-815 (1995).
59. C. Rensing, U. Kùes, U. Stahl, D. H. Nies, and B. Friedrich' J. Bacteriol.. 17 4. 1288-1292 (L992).
60. R. L. Brunker and T. LBott, AppI. Environ. Microbiol.,27,870- 873 (1974)
61. S. Yannai, I. Berdicevsky, and L. Duek, App l Enuiron. Micro' biol.. 57 . 245-247 (I99L)
62. D. Ben-Bassat and A. M. Mayer, Physiol. Plant,33' 128-L32 ( 1975).
63. D. Ben-Bassat and A. M. Mayer, Physiol. Plant' 40' 157 -L62 (r977).
64. G. J. Jones, B. P Palenik, and F. M. M. Morel, J. Phycol.'23,237- 244 (t987).
65. E. Capolino, E. M. Tledici, M. Pepi, and F. Baldi, BioMetals, submitted.
66. H. C. H. Hahne and W. Kroontje, J. Environ. QuaI.,2, 444-450 ( 1973).
67. R. Wollast, G. Billen, and F T. Mackenzie, Enuiron. Sci. Res.,7, r45-L67 (1975).
68. K. Drbal, K. Vèber, and J. Zahradnìk, BuII. Environ Contam. Toxicol. 34. 904-908 (1985).
69. K. W. Bruland, J. R. Donat, and D. A. Hutchins, .Llrnnol. Ocean' ogr, 36, r555-L577 (199L).
70. R. P Mason, K. R. Rolfhus, and W F. Fitzgerald, Watet Air Soil Pollut., 80, 665-667 (1995).
71. W. J. Spangler, J. L. SpigareÌli, J. M. Rose, R. S FÌippen, and H. M. MilÌer, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol , 25, 488-493 (1973).
?2. D. Nelson. W. R. Blair, F. E. Brinckman, R. R. Colwell, and W P Iverson, Appl. Microbiol., 26, 32I-326 (L973).
73. B. H. Olson, T. Barkay, and R. R. Colwell, Appl. Enuiron. Micro- biol.. 38. 47 8-485 (197 9).
74. K. Nakamura, T. Fujisaki, and H. Tamashiro, Environ. Res.,40, 58-67 (1986).
75. K. Nakamura, M. Sakamoto, H. Uchiyama, and O. Yagi, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol.. 56. 304-305 (1990).
252
BALDI
76. 77. 78. 79.
80.
F. Baldi, G. J. Olson, and F. E. Brinckman,J. Geomicrobiol., S, 1-16 (1987).
G. J. Olson, W. L Iverson, and F. E. Brinckman,Curn Microbiol., 5, 115-118 (1981).
F. Baldi. and G. J. Olson,Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol., SS,772-776 (1987).
F. Baldi, M. Filippelli, and G. J. Olson, Microbial Ecol..1Z,268- 274 (1989).
F. L. Singelton and R. K. Gutrie , Water Res., 11,699-642 (1977).
81. T. Barkay, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol.,53,2725-2792 (1982).
82. F. Baldi, A. Boudou, and F. Ribeyr.e, Arch. Enuiron. Contam.
Toxicol.. 22. 439-444 (I99D.
83. M. J. Bale, J. C. Fry, and M. J.Day,Appl. Enuiron. Microbiot.,54, 972-978 (1988).
84. T. Barkay, C. A. Liebert, and M. Gillman , Appl. Enuiron. Micro- biol., 55, 1196-1202 (1989).
85. N. Anast and J. Smit, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol., 54, 8Og-8L7 (1988).
86. T. Barkay and G. S. Sayler, in Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard. Assessment, Vol. 10 (W. J. Adams, G. A. Chapman, and W. G. Landis, eds.), ASTM STP 971. American Society for Testing and
Materials, Philadelphia, 1988, pp. 29-36.
87. F. Baldi, M. A. Bianco, and M. Pepi, Sci. Total Enuiron.,164,gg- 107 (1995).
88. A. Liebert, T. Barkay, and R. R. Thrner, Microbial Ecot..2I.l}g- 149 (1991).
89. N. Bloom, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. 9ci.,46,llgt-1140 (1989).
90. Y. H. Lee and J. Mowrer,Anal. Chim. Acta,221,259-268 (1989).
91. R. Fisher, S. Rapsomanikis, and M. O. Andreae,Anol. Chem..65. 763-766 ( 1993).
92. M. Filippelli, F. Baldi, F. E. Brinckman, and G. J. Olson, Enuiron. Sci. Technol., 26, 1457 -1460 Í992).
93. F. Baldi and M. Filippelli, in Mercury Pollution, Integration and Synthesis (C. J. Watras and J. W. Huckabee, eds.), Lewis Pub- lishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1994, pp.527-539.
94. S. Padberg, A. Iverfeldt, Y. H. Lee, F. Baldi, M. Filippelli, K. May, and M. Stoeppler, ín Mercury Pollution, Integration and Syn-
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 253
thesis (C. J. Watras and J. W. Huckabee, eds'), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1994, pp. 567-580.
95. S. Jensen and A. Jernelóv, Nature,223,753-754 (1969).
96. M. Wood, F. S. Kennedy, and C. G. Rose, Nature,220,173-174 (1968).
97. N. Imura, E. Sukegawa, S. K. Pan, K. Nagao, J. Y. Kim, T. Kwan, and T. Ukita, Science, 172,1248-L249 (1972).
98. L. Bertilisson and H. Y. Neujahr, Biochemistry, 70,2805-2808 (1971).
99. A. W. Andren and R. C. Harriss, Nature,245,256-257 (1973).
100. M. Yamada and K. Tonomura, J. Ferm. Technol.,50' 159-166 Í97D.
101. M. Yamada and K. Tonomura, J. Ferm. Technol.,50, 893-900 (r972).
102. J. W. Vonk and A. K. Sijpesteijn, Antoine Van Leeuwenhoek, J. Microbiol. Serol.. 39. 505-513 (1973).
103. M. K. Hamdy and O. R. Noyes, Appl. Microbiol., 30, 424-432 (1975).
104. J. T. Tlevors, J. Basic Microbiol.,26, 499-504 (1986).
105. B. D. Lago and A. L. Demain, J. Bocteriol.,99,347-349 (1969). 106. J. P. Kusel, Y. H. Fa, and A. L. Demain, J. Gen. Microbiol., 172,
107.
108.
109.
110.
111. IL2.
113. 114.
459-463 (1988).
O. Hirayama and Y. Katsuta, Agric. Biol. Chem.,52,2949-2951 (1988).
R. M. Jeter, B. M. Olivera, andJ. R. Roth, J' Bacteriol.,759,206- 213 (1984).
J. R. Guest, S. Friedman, and D' D. Woods,Noture,795,340-342 (1962).
R. O. Brady and H. A. Barker, Biochem. Biophys' Res. Commun., 4. 464-468 (1961).
J. R.. A.Vogt and P. Renz,Eun J. Biochem.,171,655-659 (1988)' B. A. Blaylock and T. C. Stadtman,Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 116,
138-141 (1966).
M. J. Wolin, E. A. Wolin, and S. Wolfe, Biochem. Biophys' Res. Comm.un.. 15. 420-423 (1964).
B. A. Blaylock, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 124,314-324 (1968).
115. E. Stupperich and B. Kràutler, Arcà. Microbiol., 149,268-Z7L (1988).
116. E. Stupperich, H. J. Eisinger, and B. Kràutler, Zun J. Biochem., 172, 459-464 (L988).
117. A. Peterkofskj, B. Redfield, and H. Weissbach, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 5, 213-216 (f 961).
118. S. C. Choi and R. Bartha,AppI. Enuiron. Microbiol.,59,290-295 (1993).
119. L. Ladner, Nature, 230, 452-454 (L97L).
120. M. A. Miller and S. A. Harmon, Nature, 215, 5BL-582 (1967).
121. K. Reisinger, Chem., 3 16,
122. G. Compeau 1207 (1984).
123. G. Compeau 502 (1985).
M. Stoeppler, and H. W Nurberg, Fre senius Z. AnaI- 612-615 (1983).
and R. Bartha,Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol.,48,1.203- and R. Bartha, AppI- Enuiron. Microbiol.,50, 499-
124. T. Fagerstròm and A. Jernelóv, Water Res.,5,l2l-L22 (L97L).
125. Y Talmi and R. E. Mesmer, Water Res.,9,547-454 (L975).
126. G. Compeau and R. Bartha, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol..31. 486-493 (r983).
127. G. Compeau and R. Bartha, AppI. Enuiron. Microbiot., SS,26L- 265 (1987).
128. M. Berman, T. Chase, andR. Bartha, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol-, 565, 298-300 (1990).
129. J. M. Wood., Toricol. Enuiron. Chem. , 7 , 229-240 (1984).
130. J. M. Wood, in The Biological Alkylation of Heauy Metals (p. J. Craig and F. Gockling, eds.), Royal Society ofChemistry, London, 1988, pp. 62-76.
131. M. FilippelÌi and F. Baldi,Appl. Organometal. Chem.,7,487-492 (r993).
132. J. Ui, Reu. Intern. Oceanogr. Med., 22-23,79-128 (L97L).
133. K. Irukayama, S. Fujiki, S. Tajima, and S. Omod, Jpn. J. Public Health, 1 9, 25-32 17972).
134. S. Silver, G. Endo, and K. Nakamura, J. Jpn. Soc. Water Enui- ron., 17,27-35 (L994).
135. F. Bakir, S. F. Damluji, L. Amin-Zaki, M. Murthada, A. Khalidi,
BALDI
I
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg
N. Y. Al-Rawi, S. Tikriti, H. I. Dhahia T. W. Clarkson, J. C. Smith,
and R. A. Doherty, Science, 181,230-241 (1973)'
136. D. O. Marsh, G. J. Myers, T. W. Clarkson, L. Amin-Zaki, and S.
Tikriti. Tfans. Am. Neurol Assoc., 102,69-7I (1977).
137. D. O. Marsh, G.J. Myers, T. W. Clarkson, L. Amin-Zakr, S. Tikriti, and M. A. Majeed, Ann. Neurol.,7,348-355 (1980).
138. B. H. Olson and R. C. Cooper, Nature,252,682-683 (1974).
139. S. M. Callister and M. R. Winfrey, Water, Aic Soil Pollut., 29,
453-465 (1986).
140. E. T. Korthals and M. R. Winfrey, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol.,53,
2397-2404 (1987).
I4l. R. J. Steffan, E. T. Korthals, and M. R. Winfrey, Appl. Enuiron.
Microbiol., 54, 2003-2009 (1988).
t42. M. R. Winfrey and J. W. M. Rudd, Enuiron. Toxicol. Chem',9,
853-869 (1990).
143. C. J. Watras, N. S. Bloom, S. A. Claas, K.A. Morrison, C' G'
Gilmour, and S. R. Craig, Wate4 Air SoiI Pollut', 80,735-745 (1995).
144. I. Bjórklund, H. Borg, and K' Johansson, Ambio, 13,ll8-I2l (1984).
145. P. Andersson, H. Borg, and P. Ilàrrage, Wate4 Ain SoiI Pollut', 80, 889-892 (1995).
146. W. G. Cope, J. G. Wiener, and R. G. Rada, Enuiron' Toxicol' Chem., 9, 931-940 (1990).
I47. J. G. Wiener, W. F. Fitzgerald, C. J. Watras, and R' G' Rada, Enuiron. Toxicol Chern.,9, 909-918 (1990).
148. C. J. Watras, N. S. Bloom, R. J. M. Hudson, S. Gherini, R' Mun- son, S. A. Class, K. A. Morrison, J. Hurley, J' G' Wiener, W' F' Fitzgerald, R. Mason, G. Vandal, D. Powell, R. Rada, L' Rislov, M' Winfrey, J. Elder, D. Krabbenhoft, A. W Andren, C' Babiaraz, D. B. Porcella, and J. W. Huckabee, in Mercury Pollution: Inte- gration and. Synthesis (C. J. Watras and J. W' Huckabee, eds'), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1994, pp. 153-177'
149. J. W. M. Rudd, Water Aír Soil Pollut',80,697-713 (1995)'
150. H. Hultberg, .A'. Iverfeldt, and Y. H. Lee, in Mercury Pollution: Integration and. Synthesls (C. J. Watras and J' W' Huckabee, eds.), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1994, pp' 313-322'
256
BALDI
151. A. Furutani and J. W M. Rudd, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol.,40, 770-776 (1980).
152. L. Xun, N. E. R. Campbell, and J. W. M. Rudd, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 44, 750-757 (1987).
153. D. W. Schindler, R. H. Hesslein, R. Wagemann, and W. S. Broecker, Cq.n. J. Fish. Aquat. 5ci.,37,373-377 (1980).
154. T. A. Jackson, G. Kipphut, R. H. Hesslein, and D. W. Schindler, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. 9ci.,37,387-402 (1980).
155. P. S. Ramlal, J. W. M. Rudd, A. Furutani, and L. Xun, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42, 685-692 (1985).
156. N. D. Yan, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. 5ci.,40,62I-626 (1988).
157. B. D. Davies, D. S. Anderson, and F. Berge,Nature,SlG,4B6-498 (1985).
158. S. W. Effier, G. C. Schafran, and C. T. Driscoll, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42, 17 07 -17 II (1985).
159. H. Nagase, Y. Ose, T. Sato, and T. Ishikawa, Sci. Total Enuiron., 32, t47-156 (1984).
160. Y. H. Lee, H. Hultberg, and I. Anderson, Water; Ain Soil Pollut., 25,39r-400 (1985).
161. R. Ahmed, K. May, and M. Stoeppler, Sci. Tbtal Enuiron.,60, 249-26I (1987).
162. N. S. Bloom and C. J. Watras, Sci. Total Enuiron., 8Z / BB, Lgg- 207 (1989).
163. V. L. St. Louis, J. W. M. Rudd, C. A. Kelly, and L. Barrie, Waten Aia Soil Pollut., 80, 405-414 (1995).
164. J. J. Bisogni and A. W. Lawrence, J. Water Pollut. Control. Fed., 47, r35-t52 (t975).
165. I. R. Rowland, M. J. Davies, and P. Grasso,Noúure,265,408-411 Í977).
166. P. J. Craig and P. D. Bartlett, Nature,2ZS,6g5-6g7 (1g7g).
167. H. S. K. Pan-Hu and N. Imura, Arch. Microbiol., 12g,49-52 (1981).
168. R. P. Mason and W. F. Fitzgerald,Wate4 Air Soil pottut.. 56,779- 789 (1991).
169. G. A. Cutter and T. J. Oates, Anal. Chem., Sg,7L7-72I (lgg7).
L70. D. Cossa, R. P. Mason, and W. F. Fitzgeral d, Mar. pollut. Bull.,2g, 381-384 (1994).
!.rf
MICROBES AND THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF Hg 257
1-7t, 172. 173. L74. 175. L76. 177.
178.
179. 180.
181.
I82. 183.
184. 185.
186. I87.
P. Quevauvillea O. F. X. Donard, J. C. Wasserman, F. M. Martin, and J. Schneider, App l. Organometal. Chem. , 6, 22L-228 (L992).
J. M. Bellama, K. J. Jewett, W. F. Manders, and J. D. Nies, Sci. Total Enuiron., 73, 39-51 (1988).
D. Wallschlàger, H. Hintelmann, R.D.Evans, and R. D. Wilken, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80,1325-1329 (1995).
P. J. Craig and P. A. Moreton,Man Pollut.8u11.,75,406-408 (1984).
D. Strómberg, A. Strómberg, and U. Wahlgren, Water, Air Soil Pollut., 56, 681-695 (1991).
D. Dryssen and M. Wedborg, Water, Air Soil Pollut.,56,507 -579 (1991).
F. Baldi, V. P. Kukhar, and Z. R. Ulberg, in Perspectiues of Bio- remediation (J. W. Wild, S. D. Varfolomeyev, and A. Scozzafava, eds.), NATO SRl-series, in press.
F. Baldi, M. Pepi, D. Burrini, G. Kniewald, D. Scali, and E. Lanciotti, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol., 62, 2398-2404 ( 1996).
G. G. Leppard, Sci. Total Enuiron,, 765,103-131 (1995).
D. C. Gillespie and D. P. Scott, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.,28,1807- 1808 (1971).
F. Baldi, T. Clark, S. S. Pollack, and G. J. Olson, Appl. Enuiron. Microbiol., 58, 1853-1856 (1992).
F. G. Smith, Am. Mineral.,27,1-19 (1940).
M. Sakamoto, A. Nakano, Y. Kinyo, H. Higashi, and M. Futat- suka, Ecotoxicol. Enuiron. Safety, 22, 58-66 (1991).
M. T. Anconelli, C. Baldrati, and W. Vandini, Acqua & Aria, 10, 1323-1331 (1980).
D. Ballardini, R. Setti, A. Minghetti, A. Amadori, and A.Pezzi,in Analisi dello Stato Ambienta.le e Sanitario nelle Valli Rauennati: La Pialassa di Baiona (S. Soprani and C. Ricci, eds.), Centro
Stampa U.S.L. Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy, 1994, pp. 325-354.
F. D'Itri, Enuiron. Monitor. Asses., 19, 165-182 (1990).
F. Baldi, A. Renzoni, and M. Bernhard, Mercury concentrations in pelagic fish (anchovy, mackerel and sardine) from the Italian coasts and Strait of Gibraltar, IV"" Journées d'études sur les pollutions marines en Mediterranée. Antalya, Ttrrkey, 1978, pp. 25\-254.