Content uploaded by David A Tallmon
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by David A Tallmon on Apr 10, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Fisheries Research 109 (2011) 370–372
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Fisheries Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres
Short communication
A comparison of tagging methodology for North Pacific giant octopus
Enteroctopus dofleini
Patrick D. Barrya,∗, Sherry L. Tamonea,b, David A. Tallmona,b
aSchool of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 17101 Point Lena Loop Rd, Juneau, AK 99801, USA
bDepartment of Biology, University of Alaska Southeast, 11120 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801, USA
article info
Article history:
Received 11 June 2010
Received in revised form 18 February 2011
Accepted 18 February 2011
Keywords:
Enteroctopus dofleini
Tagging
Mark-recapture
Peterson disc
Visible implant elastomer
abstract
New opportunities for the export of food grade octopus have furthered interest in developing an actively
managed directed fishery for North Pacific giant octopus Enteroctopus dofleini in Alaska state waters.
Trawl, long-line, and pot fisheries already harvest over 230 metric tons of octopus as bycatch annu-
ally. Managed under the authority of commissioner’s permits, applications for directed harvest in most
management regions have historically been rejected due to the lack of information on stock status.
Our limited knowledge of octopus movement, age structure, and demography hamper the ability to
successfully manage this potential fishery. Chief among these obstacles is the lack of abundance esti-
mates on which to base harvest guidelines. While catch-per-unit-effort estimates can be made from
bycatch data and used as a proxy of abundance, these estimates can often be inaccurate. Mark-recapture
estimates can be more accurate, but can also be expensive and require an effective means of marking
individuals. We compared two different tags in order to assess their effectiveness for use on octopuses.
We tagged 97 octopuses with modified Peterson discs and visible implant elastomer tags in Kachemak
Bay, Alaska. Three tagged octopuses were recaptured, making a statistically sound tag comparison dif-
ficult. Our data suggest that visible implant elastomer tags will be a more effective means of marking
octopuses.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
External tags have been used to study animal behavior, move-
ment and migration, and to provide information on age, growth,
mortality, and abundance (McFarlane et al., 1990). Growing inter-
est in an actively managed directed fishery for North Pacific
giant octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) has raised both manage-
ment and ecological questions, including those concerned with
octopus movement patterns and abundances. While early tag-
ging studies looked at residence times (Hartwick et al., 1984;
Mather et al., 1985), little is known about large-scale dispersal or
abundance.
A variety of chemical (Ikeda et al., 1999, 2003), electronic
(Anderson and Babcock, 1999; Mather et al., 1985; Scheel et al.,
2007), external (Hartwick et al., 1984; Nagasawa et al., 1991;
Robinson and Hartwick, 1986) and tattooing/branding (Nagasawa
et al., 1991; Replinger and Wood, 2007) tags have been used to
study cephalopods. External tags such as Atkins and Petersen tags
are the most commonly used tag to study E. dofleini (Hartwick et al.,
1984; Nagasawa et al., 1991; Robinson and Hartwick, 1986). Cos-
∗Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 907 796 6034; fax: +1 907 796 6447.
E-mail address: patdbarry@gmail.com (P.D. Barry).
grove (Royal British Columbia Museum, pers. comm.) investigated
the use of numbered plastic discs secured through the mantle with
a plastic cable tie, but octopuses ripped those out leaving large
wounds in the mantle. Tattoo and branding, particularly visible
implant elastomer tags (VIE; Northwest Marine Technology, Shaw,
Washington) have been used successfully on the squid Sepioteuthis
sepioidea to investigate growth rates (Replinger and Wood, 2007).
However, when used on the cuttlefish Sepia (Mesembrisepia) lati-
manus this method (injecting latex between skin and cuttlebone)
led to significant wounds and mortalities (Nagasawa et al., 1991)
suggesting that its usefulness may be limited to animals of a certain
size.
While Peterson tags are the most commonly used tag, the extent
to which they affect animals is debated. Robinson and Hartwick
(1986) observed no ulcerations around tags and octopuses did not
seem to be adversely affected by tagging. Domain et al. (2000) com-
pared spaghetti and Petersen disc tags for use on Octopus vulgaris,
and determined that Petersen disc tags stayed on longer. How-
ever, the authors did not attribute observed tag loss to necrosis
of surrounding tissue or manipulation of the tag by octopuses. In
either case visible implant elastomer (VIE) tags may decrease tag
loss and provide a more effective and efficient means of mark-
ing. The goal of this study is to compare two different marking
techniques.
0165-7836/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2011.02.011
P.D. Barry et al. / Fisheries Research 109 (2011) 370–372 371
Fig. 1. Giant Pacific octopuses (Enteroctopus dofleini) were tagged using two differ-
ent marks: Petersen disc tags and visible implant elastomer (VIE) tags. This photo
shows the location of both tags on the ventral side of the mantle. Arrows indicate
where each VIE dye was injected. Injected as a liquid, the elastomer forms a pliable
biocompatible solid. The Peterson discs were inserted through the opening in the
mantle on the ventral surface by puncturing the mantle with the two plastic screws,
and securing a plate with two plastic nuts.
2. Materials and methods
We caught E. dofleini during three surveys (29 May to 18 June
2006, 2–13 October 2006, and 25 November to 6 December 2006)
in Kachemak Bay, Alaska. Unbaited lair pots and three baited pots
(Korean hair crab pots, both commercial and personal use Ladner
shrimp pots, and black cod pots) were used.
Upon capture, we sexed animals and recorded morphometric
measurements including the interocular distance (IOD), mantle
length (ML), and weight, as well as any identifying marks. Before
tagging, each octopus was transferred to water cooled to approxi-
mately 1 ◦C to anesthetize them.
Due to the difficulty in tagging larger octopuses (>11 kg [kilo-
grams]) with the Petersen discs, and to minimize the effect of
handling time on the health of each animal when many octopuses
were caught in a string of pots, 28 octopuses were tagged using
only the VIE tags. Modified Petersen discs were inserted through the
ventral side of the mantle, secured with plastic nuts, and the excess
screw length cut flat using scissors (Fig. 1). We injected the VIE tag
subcutaneously on the ventral side of the mantle where the pig-
mentation is lightest (Fig. 1). Each elastomer tag consisted of four
injected dye spots, occupied by any of four colors (red, orange, yel-
low and/or green) to individually identify each animal. Tags were
injected using a tuberculin syringe fitted with a 20-gauge needle.
We released tagged octopuses within 10 m of the GPS coordinates
at which they were captured. During the third survey, animals were
not tagged with either Petersen or VIE tags.
3. Results
During the first and second surveys 3 and 94 E. dofleini were
tagged respectively using Petersen discs and VIE tags to allow
for their direct comparison. Of the three recaptures, two animals
were marked with both tags while the other had only the VIE tag
(Table 1). We observed from one individual that the Petersen discs
can irritate the tissue surrounding the tag resulting in necrosis
(Fig. 2). Of the two individuals recaptured that were initially tagged
with both methods, one had lost its Petersen tag while all retained
the VIE tag. Upon examination of the VIE tags no noticeable tis-
sue damage was caused at the site of injection. None of the colors
became dull or difficult to distinguish, and there was no noticeable
difference in size of the marks between mark and recapture.
4. Discussion
Our results indicate that VIE tags may be a more reliable tagging
method than the commonly used Petersen tag and that animals
may exhibit a strong trap response. While our results have impli-
cations for tagging studies for studying growth, movement, and
survival, we focus here on the implementation of mark-recapture
on estimates of abundance.
Results of recaptures suggest that VIE tags may provide a more
durable method of marking octopuses than Petersen tags. Petersen
tags were obvious upon recapture and were easily felt and seen
when handling recaptured octopuses, but led to significant tissue
damage in two individuals which may lead to tag loss. Because
they are external tags, octopus may be able to remove the plastic
nuts which secure both plates in the mantle. The VIE tags led to no
signs of irritation, but are not immediately obvious upon recapture
without manipulation of the posterior mantle. Also, consecutively
injected elastomer colors can be embedded in the epidermis such
that the colored dots move with respect to each other when the
mantle tissue is manipulated and this may lead to the misidentifi-
cation of recaptures. Of the three recaptures, the one individual that
had lost the Petersen tag showed significant tissue damage around
the site where the tag had been inserted. Although brown trout
have been observed to absorb the VIE during growth or for layers
of musculature or epidermis to cover the tag (Olsen and Vollestad,
2001), we would still be able to identify octopuses in this study by
their Petersen tag. Consequently, low recapture rates in the third
survey are not likely due to tag loss.
Materials used in the construction of the Peterson disc tags as
well as the part of the body tagged may determine the extent to
which wounds develop. Robinson and Hartwick (1986),Domain
et al. (2000), and Cosgrove (pers. comm.) used Peterson disc tags
secured by nickel pins to the base of the left third. The smaller
diameter of the nickel pin may cause less irritation to surround tis-
sue than the plastic screws with which we constructed our tags.
Tagging at the base of the left third arm where muscle is the thick-
Table 1
Summary statistics from three recaptured North Pacific giant octopuses in Kachemak Bay, AK. Upon capture we recorded sex, weight, inner ocular distance (IOD), and mantel
length (ML).
Animal ID Sex Weight gained (kg) Change in IOD (cm) Change in ML (cm) Distance moved (km) Days between captures
Peterson VIE
85 OOYY F 1.5 0 0 7.53 52
N/A GRRY F 4.5 1.5 2.5 5.31 48
118 RRGG M 1.25 2.5 2 1.44 63
Avg 2.42 1.33 1.33 4.76 54.33
372 P.D. Barry et al. / Fisheries Research 109 (2011) 370–372
Fig. 2. Piercing the mantle of the North Pacific giant octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) may cause significant wounds and result in necrosis and tag loss. Left: This photo shows
part of the ventral mantle where the tag has been successfully inserted immediately after application of the mark. Tissue was healthy and the tag was clearly visible. Right:
This photo shows the ventral side of the mantle where a Petersen tag was beginning to cause necrosis after approximately 54 days.
est may extend the time for which it takes the tissue to reject the
tag. While no tissue damage was observed in these three stud-
ies, animals were not double marked and tag retention was not
estimated.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to those who helped in collecting data including
D. Scheel, J. Grund, D. Veerhusen and the crew of the F/V Shady
Lady, G. Carroll and the crew of the F/V Centurion and J. Browning.
This research was supported by a grant from the Alaska Fishery
Development Foundation.
References
Anderson, T.J., Babcock, R.C., 1999. Subcutaneous electromagnetic tagging of benthic
octopus: a preliminary evaluation. Mar. Freshw. Res. 50, 225–227.
Domain, F., Jouffre, D., Caverivere, A., 2000. Growth of Octopus vulgaris from tagging
in Senegalese waters. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 80, 699–705.
Hartwick, E.B., Ambrose, R.F., Robinson, S.M.C., 1984. Den utilization and the move-
ments of tagged Octopus dofleini. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 11, 95–110.
Ikeda, Y., Arai, N., Kidokoro, H., Sakamoto, W., 2003. Strontium:calcium ratios in
statoliths of Japanese common squid Todarodes pacificus (Cephalopoda: Ommas-
trephidae) as indicators of migratory behavior. Mar. Ecol. -Prog. Ser. 251,
169–179.
Ikeda, Y., Arai, N., Sakamoto, W., Mitsuhashi, M., Yoshida, K., 1999. Preliminary report
on PIXE analysis for trace elements of Octopus dofleini statoliths. Fish. Sci. 65,
161–162.
Mather, J.A., Resler, S., Cosgrove, J., 1985. Activity and movement patterns of Octopus
dofleini. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 11, 301–314.
McFarlane, G.A., Wydoski, R.S., Prince, E.D., 1990. Historical review of the develop-
ment of external tags and marks. In: Parker, N.C., Giorgi, A.E., Heidinger, R.C.,
Jester Jr., D.B., Prince, E.D., Winans, G.A.S. (Eds.), American Fisheries Society
Symposium, vol. 7. Seattle, Washington, pp. 9–29.
Nagasawa, K., Takayanagi, S., Takami, T., 1991. Cephalopod Tagging and marking in
Japan: a review. In: Okutani, T., O’Dor, R.K., Kubodera, T.s. (Eds.), Recent Advances
in Fisheries Biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp. 313–329.
Olsen, E.M., Vollestad, L.A., 2001. An evaluation of visible implant elastomer for
marking age-0 brown trout. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 21, 967–970.
Replinger, S.E., Wood, J.B., 2007. A preliminary investigation of the use of subcu-
taneous tagging in Caribbean reef squid Sepioteuthis sepioidea (Cephalopoda:
Loliginidae). Fish. Res. 84, 308–313.
Robinson, S.M.C., Hartwick, E.B., 1986. Analysis of growth based on tag-
recapture of the giant Pacific octopus Octopus-dofleini-martini. J. Zool. 209,
559–572.
Scheel, D., Lauster, A., Vincent, T.L.S., 2007. Habitat ecology of Enteroctopus dofleini
from middens and live prey surveys in Prince William Sound Alaska. In:
Landman, N.H., Davis, R.A., Mapes, R.H. (Eds.), Cephalopods Present and Past:
New Insights and Fresh Perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht/The Netherlands, pp.
434–458.