Content uploaded by Amy Townsend-Small
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Amy Townsend-Small on Jan 07, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Click
Here
for
Full
A
rticl e
Correction to “Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions
in urban turf”
Amy Townsend‐Small and Claudia I. Czimczik
Received 29 January 2010; published 27 March 2010.
Citation: Townsend‐Small, A., and C. I. Czimczik (2010), Cor-
rection to “Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions
in urban turf,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L06707, doi:10.1029/
2010GL042735.
[1] In the paper “Carbon sequestration and greenhouse
gas emissions in urban turf” by A. Townsend‐Small and C.I.
Czimczik (Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L02707,
doi:10.1029/2009GL041675, 2010), we discovered an error
in the calculation of carbon dioxide (CO
2
) emissions from
fuel consumption during turfgrass maintenance. The data for
fuel consumption and park area described in the original
publication are correct. Park management contractors use
about 2700 gallons of gasoline per month to maintain a total
park area of about 2 × 10
6
m
2
[Townsend‐ Small and
Czimczik, 2010]. We assumed that one gallon of gasoline
equaled 2421 g C [Environmental Protection Agency, 2005]
and a combustion efficiency of 85% [Lal, 2004]. This results
in CO
2
emissions from fuel usage of 122 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
,
not 1469 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
as originally reported [Townsend ‐
Small and Czimczik, 2010], or about 24% of the organic
carbon (OC) storage per m
−2
shown in ornamental lawns
(Figure 3 of the current study).
[
2] This changes the total global warming potential (GWP)
of both ornamental lawns and athletic fields (Figure 3b).
Based on this correction, the total GWP of ornamental lawns
ranges from −108 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
for the low fertilization
scenario (10 g N m
−2
yr
−1
) to +285 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
for the
high fertilizer scenario (75 g N m
−2
yr
−1
). In athletic fields,
which do not store OC in soils, there is a positive GWP
ranging from +405 to +798 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
for the low and
high fertilizer scenarios, respectively. Our estimates of
global warming potential also have errors associated with
our measurements of carbon sequestration and N
2
O pro-
duction (error bars in Figure 3). Ornamental lawn OC
sequestration ranges from −513 +37 to − 513 −73 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
, with uncertainties estimated from calculating
OC sequestration rates based on the standard error (SE) of
OC stocks at each time point. N
2
O emissions range from
45 +108 to 45 −25 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
at a fertilization rate of
10 g N m
−2
yr
−1
and from 145 + 109 to 145 − 73 g CO
2
m
−2
yr
−1
at a fertilization rate of 75 g N m
−2
yr
−1
. Uncertainties in
N
2
O emissions were calculated from the SE of flux during
fertilizer pulses and the 25% or 75% interquartile of the
baseline flux.
[
3] This reanalysis shows that there may be a potential for
urban ornamental lawns to sequester atmospheric CO
2
if
they are managed conservatively (Figure 3b). However,
intensive management practices such as frequent application
of inorganic fertilizers, irrigation, and fuel consumption
from mowing and leaf blowing all decrease the likelihood
that urban turfgrass can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions
in cities.
References
Environmental Protection Agency (2005), Emission facts: Average carbon
dioxide emissions resulting from gasoline and diesel fuel, Rep. EPA420‐
F‐05‐001, Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, D. C.
Lal, R. (2004), Carbon emission from farm operations, Environ. Int., 30,
981–990, doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005.
Townsend‐Small, A., and C. I. Czimczik (2010), Carbon sequestration and
greenhouse gas emissions in urban turf, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L02707,
doi:10.1029/2009GL041675.
Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.
0094‐8276/10/2010GL042735
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 37, L06707, doi:10.1029/2010GL042735, 2010
L06707 1of2
Fig ure 3. (a) Global warming potential of soil OC sequestration and N
2
O emissions in ornamental lawns and athletic
fields. Error in GWP‐N
2
O is based on the mean fertilizer pulse ± its SE, ± the 25% or 75% interquartile of the baseline
flux. Error in soil GWP is estimated from the mean OC stock at each time point ± SE. (b) Same as Figure 3a, but including
estimates of CO
2
emissions from fuel use, fertilizer production, and irrigation.
2of2
TOWNSEND-SMALL AND CZIMCZIK: CORRECTION L06707L06707