Article

Co-infection by alveolate parasites and frog virus 3-like ranavirus during an amphibian larval mortality event in Florida, USA

Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, USA.
Diseases of Aquatic Organisms (Impact Factor: 1.75). 07/2013; 105(2):89-99. DOI: 10.3354/dao02625
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

A multispecies amphibian larval mortality event, primarily affecting American bullfrogs Lithobates catesbeianus, was investigated during April 2011 at the Mike Roess Gold Head Branch State Park, Clay County, Florida, USA. Freshly dead and moribund tadpoles had hemorrhagic lesions around the vent and on the ventral body surface, with some exhibiting a swollen abdomen. Bullfrogs (100%), southern leopard frogs L. sphenocephalus (33.3%), and gopher frogs L. capito (100%) were infected by alveolate parasites. The intensity of infection in bullfrog livers was high. Tadpoles were evaluated for frog virus 3 (FV3) by histology and PCR. For those southern leopard frog tadpoles (n = 2) whose livers had not been obscured by alveolate spore infection, neither a pathologic response nor intracytoplasmic inclusions typically associated with clinical infections of FV3-like ranavirus were noted. Sequencing of a portion (496 bp) of the viral major capsid protein gene confirmed FV3-like virus in bullfrogs (n = 1, plus n = 6 pooled) and southern leopard frogs (n = 1, plus n = 4 pooled). In July 2011, young-of-the-year bullfrog tadpoles (n = 7) were negative for alveolate parasites, but 1 gopher frog tadpole was positive. To our knowledge, this is the first confirmed mortality event for amphibians in Florida associated with FV3-like virus, but the extent to which the virus played a primary role is uncertain. Larval mortality was most likely caused by a combination of alveolate parasite infections, FV3-like ranavirus, and undetermined etiological factors.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maki Tabuchi, Jan 07, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Macrophages are integral to amphibian immunity against RVs, as well as to the infection strategies of these pathogens. Although CSF-1 was considered to be the principal mediator of macrophage development, the IL-34 cytokine, which shares no sequence identity with CSF-1, is now believed to contribute to vertebrate monopoiesis. However, the respective roles of CSF-1- and IL-34-derived macrophages are still poorly understood. To delineate the contribution of these macrophage populations to amphibian immunity against the RV FV3, we identified the Xenopus laevis IL-34 and transcriptionally and functionally compared this cytokine with the previously identified X. laevis CSF-1. The X. laevis CSF-1 and IL-34 displayed strikingly nonoverlapping developmental and tissue-specific gene-expression patterns. Furthermore, only CSF-1 but not IL-34 was up-regulated in the kidneys of FV3-challenged tadpoles. Intriguingly, recombinant forms of these cytokines (rXlCSF-1, rXlIL-34) elicited morphologically distinct tadpole macrophages, and whereas rXlCSF-1 pretreatment decreased the survival of FV3-infected tadpoles, rXlIL-34 administration significantly prolonged FV3-challenged animal survival. Compared with rXlIL-34-elicited macrophages, macrophages derived by rXlCSF-1 were more phagocytic but also significantly more susceptible to in vitro FV3 infections. By contrast, rXlIL-34-derived macrophages exhibited significantly greater in vitro antiranaviral activity and displayed substantially more robust gene expression of the NADPH oxidase components (p67(phox), gp91(phox)) and type I IFN. Moreover, FV3-challenged, rXlIL-34-derived macrophages exhibited several orders of magnitude greater up-regulation of the type I IFN gene expression. This marks the first report of the disparate roles of CSF-1 and IL-34 in vertebrate antiviral immunity.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Journal of Leukocyte Biology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is substantial evidence for the dominant role of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in amphibian population dynamics. However, a wide range of other pathogens could also be important in precipitating amphibian population declines, particularly in the face of climate change or other stressors. Here we discuss some examples of zoosporic parasites in the Chytridiomycota, Mesomycetozoa, Perkinsozoa and Oomycota, all of which infect amphibians in freshwater habitats. The pathosystem model provides an excellent basis for understanding host–parasite interactions. Chemotactic zoopores and several families of proteases facilitate infection. Introduction of non-native host may accelerate the dispersal of these parasites. Unlike B. dendrobatidis some of the other zoosporic parasites grow well at or slightly above 25 °C, and their growth rates are likely to increase with global warming. The interactions of parasites with each other and the combined effect of simultaneous infection with multiple species in amphibian populations remain to be carefully studied.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Fungal Ecology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives of this project were to determine population trends, current occurrence on public lands, and possible reasons for extirpation or decline of populations of 5 amphibian Species of Greatest Conservation Need: striped newt (Notophthalmus perstriatus), eastern tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum), frosted flatwoods salamander (A. cingulatum), gopher frog (Lithobates capito), and ornate chorus frog (Pseudacris ornata). We surveyed for these species from July 2010 through December 2014 using a combination of dipnet surveys, automated recording units (ARU), call surveys, and road surveys on rainy nights. We compiled all past records (from museums, databases, and the literature) and present observations of these species into an Excel database containing 1,596 records. Dipnet survey data, including locality and habitat information for surveyed wetlands, were entered into an Access database. During this project, 226 individuals participated in dipnet surveys for a total of 600 person-days, excluding the Principal Investigator. We dipnetted 1,179 unique ponds on 118 conservation lands and on private lands in 12 counties. Using all methods, we documented gopher frogs in 237 ponds (including 183 new ponds) in 30 counties (Flagler and Liberty were new counties). We documented striped newts in 46 ponds (including 24 new ponds) on 10 conservation lands. Sites on the Spring Creek Unit of Big Bend Wildlife Management Area (WMA) and Triple N Ranch WMA represent range extensions and county records for Taylor and Osceola counties. No striped newts were detected in the panhandle, even though we surveyed 59 suitable ponds at historical sites. For frosted flatwoods salamanders, we dipnetted 244 ponds on 27 conservation lands and found larvae in 3 of 25 known ponds in St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, 1 of 5 known ponds on adjacent Flint Rock WMA, and 5 new ponds and 15 of 56 known ponds in Apalachicola National Forest. In addition to dipnet surveys for ornate chorus frogs, we drove 677 km along 23 call routes in the northern peninsula and deployed 93 ARUs at sites in the peninsula and panhandle to detect calling frogs. Using all methods, ornate chorus frogs were detected in the panhandle in 60 ponds on 7 conservation lands and on private land in Jackson County, whereas they were found in the peninsula in 19 ponds on 6 conservation lands in Alachua, Clay, Lafayette (new county record), Putnam, and Taylor counties. Tiger salamanders were dipnetted in only 1 new and 2 known ponds. Road surveys found tiger salamanders moving on 3 rainy nights from 26 November 2013 through 1 January 2014 in Hernando, Levy, and Marion counties. Examination of the characteristics of all known breeding ponds (detected by this or past studies) revealed differences in preference for each species. The 396 known gopher frog breeding ponds ranged in size from 0.01 to 42.27 ha (mean 1.92 ha), whereas 124 striped newt ponds ranged in size from 0.02 to 12.22 ha (mean 1.01 ha) and were significantly smaller than gopher frog ponds. Depression marsh was the most common wetland habitat used by breeding gopher frogs (59.9%) and striped newts (50.4%). The 38 known tiger salamander ponds ranged in size from 0.04 to 20.65 ha (mean 1.69 ha), and 232 ornate chorus frog ponds ranged in size from 0.01 to 13.65 ha (mean 0.78 ha). GIS analyses of land cover within 300 m of breeding ponds indicated that sandhill is the most common land cover for gopher frogs (31%) and striped newts (44%), particularly in the panhandle. Upland pine forest comprised 40% of land cover around tiger salamander ponds, and flatwoods comprised 35% of land cover around extant flatwoods salamander ponds. Land cover around extant ornate chorus frog ponds varied. Fishes, primarily eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), were present in 17.2% of gopher frog and 11.5% of striped newt ponds. Fishes were present in 78.9% of flatwoods salamander and 46.0% of ornate chorus frog ponds (primarily ponds in flatwoods habitat). Crayfishes were present in <40% of gopher frog and striped newt ponds. Computer-generated (primarily Maxent) models of potential habitat were developed for the gopher frog (258,722 ha), striped newt (158,706 ha), tiger salamander (842,564 ha), and ornate chorus frog (1,231,746 ha). Only 21‒50% of the potential habitat identified by models occurs on conservation lands, with the ornate chorus frog having the least habitat and the striped newt the most habitat. Apalachicola National Forest, Ocala National Forest, and Withlacoochee State Forest rank in the top 10 in terms of potential habitat for all 4 species. A rules-based GIS model for the gopher frog identified 6 times more potential habitat than the computer-generated model. Our analyses of long-term climate data revealed marked differences between the panhandle and peninsula. Most drought indices showed a significant trend of increasing drought over time in the peninsula (excluding the northern peninsula) but not in the panhandle. The biggest change in drought indices occurred in NOAA’s North Central and South Central climate divisions, which represent the southern range limits of all target amphibian species except the gopher frog, which is an explosive breeder that ranges into southern Florida. In these climate divisions, the magnitude of recent droughts was similar to those in the past, but recent droughts have lasted significantly longer. Monthly changes in Palmer Hydrological Drought Index showed significant decreases (indicating increasing drought) in the late fall/early winter in the North Central and South Central climate divisions. Significant increases in average, minimum, and maximum temperatures have occurred in all peninsular regions but not the panhandle over the last 120 years. Our analyses of annual average precipitation revealed no changes over time in any part of the state, suggesting that increases in drought in the peninsula are being driven by temperature increases affecting evapotranspiration or evaporation. When we compared past (before 1980) and recent records, we observed a northward shift in the mean latitude and westward shift in the mean longitude of observations for the frosted flatwoods salamander and ornate chorus frog, suggesting that peninsular declines may be related to climate changes. Threats to amphibian populations are complex, and the species declines we observed may be due to a combination of wetland and upland habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation; climate change; and disease. Habitat degradation from silviculture and infrequent fire has likely played a major role in the declines of both species of flatwoods salamander. Given the short life span of the ornate chorus frog, prolonged winter droughts could be responsible for local population extinctions, particularly in more fragmented habitats containing few wetlands. Since 1980, significant westward shifts in mean longitude were observed for all species except the striped newt, which showed an eastward shift (approaching statistical significance) due to its apparent recent extirpation in the Munson Sandhills of Apalachicola National Forest. Its disappearance is somewhat enigmatic but may be due to wetland degradation, hydrological changes in wetlands from drought and groundwater withdrawals, and potentially an undocumented disease outbreak. Gopher frogs appear to be thriving in the peninsula; declines in the panhandle are likely primarily due to depleted gopher tortoise populations in this part of the state. Tiger salamanders are likely doing well, despite our lack of success at detecting them during this survey.
    Full-text · Technical Report · Dec 2014
Show more