Content uploaded by Marcelo A. Reguero
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Marcelo A. Reguero
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Marcelo A. Reguero
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Marcelo A. Reguero
Content may be subject to copyright.
U.S. Geologic al Survey and The National Academies; USGS OF-2007-1047, Short Research Paper 083; doi:10.3133/of2007-1047.srp083
A dromaeosaur from the Maastrichtian of James Ross Island and the Late
Cretaceous Antarctic dinosaur fauna
Judd A. Case,1 James E. Martin,2 and Marcelo Reguero3
1College of Science, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA 99004 USA (jcase@mail.ewu.edu)
2Museum of Geology, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701 USA (James.Martin@sdsmt.edu )
3Departmento Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, 1Paseo del Bosque 1990 La Plata, Argentina (mreguero@netverk.com.ar)
Abstract The recovery of material of a small theropod from the Early Maastrichtian, Cape Lamb Member of the Snow
Hill Island Formation is an unusual occurrence from primarily marine sediments. The pedal morphology of the
specimen that includes a Metatarsal II with a lateral expansion caudal to Metatarsal III, a third metatarsal that is
proximally narrow and distally wide, a Metatarsal III with a distal end that is incipiently ginglymoidal and a second
pedal digit with sickle-like ungual are all diagnostic of a theropod that belongs to the family of predatory dinosaurs, the
Dromaeosauridae. Yet this Antarctic dromaeosaur retains plesiomorphic features in its ankle and foot morphology. As
new dromaeosaur species are being recovered from the mid-Cretaceous of South America and the retention of primitive
characters in the Antarctic dromaeosaur, a new biogeographic hypothesis on dromaeosaur distribution has been
generated. Gondwanan dromaeosaurs are not North America immigrants into South America and Antarctica; rather
they are the relicts of a cosmopolitan dromaeosaur distribution, which has been separated by the vicariant break up of
Pangea and created an endemic clade of dromaeosaurs in Gondwana.
Citation: Case, J.A., J.E. Martin, and M. Reguero (2007), A dromaeosaur from the Maastrichtian of James Ross Island and the Late Cretaceous
Antarctic dinosaur fauna, in Antarctica: A Keystone in a Changing World – Online Proceedings of the 10th ISAES X, edited by A.K. Cooper and
C.R. Raymond et al., USGS Open-File Report 2007-1047, Short Research Paper 083, 4 p.; doi:10.3133/of2007-1047.srp083
Introduction
Relatively few dinosaurs have been collected from the
Late Cretaceous of Antarctica. Heretofore, only five
dinosaur species have been reported from the James Ross
Basin on the eastern side of the Antarctic Peninsula
(Figure 1).
Figure 1. James Ross Basin along the northeastern
Antarctic Peninsula. The numbered localities indicate
where dinosaur specimens have been recovered: 1) Cape
Lachman, a large theropod; 2) Santa Marta Cove, a
nodosaur; 3) The Naze, an iguantodontid and the
dromaeosaur reported here; 4) Cape Lamb, a
hypsilophodontid; and 5) Sandwich Bluff, a hadrosaur.
The principal reason for the paucity of dinosaurs is
because the source rocks were deposited in a shallow
marine environment. Therefore, any specimens recovered
represent specimens that had to have been derived from
terrestrial environments and floated from shore, to be
preserved against high odds in a marine setting.
Discovery of associated dinosaur remains are rare in such
circumstances, making the recovery reported herein
unusual.
The associated remains of a small theropod dinosaur
weathered from the lower portion of the Cape Lamb
Member of the Snow Hill Island Formation (Crame et al.,
2004) on the Naze of James Ross Island. This new
dinosaur occurrence is the second theropod from the Late
Cretaceous of Antarctica. The first is a large megalasaur-
like theropod represented by a femur from Santonian
rocks in Cape Lachman, James Ross Island (Molnar et al.,
1996). This femur represents a very large theropod
species, much larger than the gracile theropod discussed
here. Other dinosaur remains include a nodosaur, the first
dinosaur recovered from Late Cretaceous rocks in
Antarctica (Gasparini et al., 1987). The nodosaur was
recovered from Santa Marta Cove area on James Ross
Island from the Late Campanian Herbert Sound Member
of the Santa Marta Formation (Crame et al., 1991). From
the younger Cape Lamb Member of the Snow Hill Island
Formation on Vega Island, a partial skeleton of a
hysilophodontid dinosaur was recovered from these Early
Maastrichtian deposits (Hooker et al. 1992). From
similar-aged deposits on the James Ross Island, portions
of a hindleg and foot of an iguanodontid were recovered
(Cambiaso et al., 2002). However its exact stratigraphic
and geographic location are unsure, although field
evidence suggests that it came from Fortress Hill next to
Terrapin Hill. Finally, dental and pedal material of a
hadrosaurine hadrosaur, was recovered from the Late
Maastrichtian Sandwich Bluff Member of the Snow Hill
Island Formation on Vega Island (Case et al., 2000). As
can be observed, most specimens are fragmentary in
nature, so the recovery of an associated series of skeletal
U.S. Geologic al Survey and The National Academies; USGS OFR-2007-xxxx, Extended Abstract.yyy, 1-4 Ver. 1/25/07
Figure 2. Posing of the bones in life position of the left lower leg, ankle and foot of the dromaeosaur
from the Naze Peninsula on James Ross Island. In addition to the bones from the left hindlimb
illustrated here, the specimen also includes some elements from the right hindlimb including distal tibia,
and distal ends of metatarsals II and III.
elements belonging to a carnivorous dinosaur is most
fortuitous.
Description
The dentition is poorly preserved except for two teeth
that were preserved in a fragment of concretion. The
teeth and the associated fragments all indicate long,
narrow biconvex teeth. This shape suggests that both
anterior and posterior carina were present; however, no
serrations were noted on the carina, thus it is impossible
to determine if serrations were present or absent. The
teeth are incipiently laterally compressed, but retain a
rounded outline, particularly anteriorly. The shape is
indicative of teeth from the anterior region of the jaw.
The left tibia is the most complete of the two tibia
fragments and most of the pedal elements are from the
left pes as well. The distal articular surface of the tibia is
planar and pentagonal in outline. The anterior face of the
distal tibia is only slightly concave to indicate the point of
articulation with the ascending process of the astragalus.
The astragalus is spool shaped with a thick semicircular
medial end and a thinner lateral end. The distal astragular
facet is curved from the anterior side to the posterior side.
The anterior surface is vertical, forming the base of the
ascending process of the astragalus. The ascending
process is broken at 1.1 cm above its base. The tibia is
locked into the astragalus with the planar tibioastragalar
facet and with the ascending process of the astragalus, but
the normally tight articulation between the ascending
process and the tibia seen in theropods is absent here. The
disc-shaped calcaneus is separate from the astragalus,
however, the calcaneus is fused to the fibula. The
calcaneus articulates with the Metatarsal IV (= MtIV) and
the distal fibula is ovoid in cross-section.
The proximal and distal ends of metatarsals II, III, and
IV are present for the left pes. The diaphyses for the
metatarsal have been highly fragmented by the freezing
and thawing conditions of the Antarctic climate and so far
only partial reconstruction of the diaphyses have been
possible. The proximal articular surface of MtII is
concave dorsally to accommodate the thick and curved
medial end of the astragalus. The distal MtII is condylar
in medial view, but triangular in ventral view. The distal
articular surface is narrow anteriorly and wide posteriorly,
Case et al.: A dromaeosaur from the Maastrichtian of James Ross Island and the Late Cretaceous Antarctic dinosaur fauna
3
as it forms a grooved and bitrochlear articular surface,
thus anteriorly the distal articular surface is convex while
posteriorly it is ginglymoidal.
MtIII retains a flattened distal tarsal element. This
outline in dorsal view of the proximal end of Mt III is
bullet-shaped with the sides being both convex.
Posteriorly, the MtIII is pinched into a long narrow ridge
resulting in the triangular cross-section for most of the
length of the diaphysis. MtII and MtIV are also triangular
in cross-section however in each case the apex is directed
towards the central metatarsal (MtIII). The triangular
shape is the result of a posterolateral expansion in MtII
and a posteromedial expansion in MtIV. These
expansions or flanges thus obscure much of the length of
MtIII in posterior view so that only the narrow posterior
ridge on MtIII can be seen. The distal end is wide and
ginglymoidal with prominent medial and lateral trochlea
bordering a wide sulcus.
The MtIV outline is an ovoid and the distal end of
MtIV resembles that of the distal end of MtII. The first
phalanx of digit II is large and tall as the proximal
articular surface is extended vertically. The articular
surface is not ginglymoidal, but it is highly cupped,
extended and asymmetrical to match the shape of the
distal articular surface of MtII. The ungual phalanx of
digit II is enlarged and trenchant, but the element is
incomplete with only the proximal third and a fragment
near the tip recovered. Here the proximal articular
surface is keeled and thus ginglymoidal. The lateral
groove is more dorsal than the medial groove and remains
the deeper of the two near to the tip of the ungual. The
distal portion of the ungual is tall and narrow and
symmetrical in cross-section.
Discussion
Morphology
The morphology of the pes is consistent with that of
members of the theropod family Dromaeosauridae, a
family that includes such predatory dinosaurs as
Velociraptor and Deinonychus, which have an enlarged
sickle-like claw on their hindfeet. Novas and Pol (2005)
presented a suite of diagnostic character states for the pes
of a dromaeosaurid, which are also present in this
Antarctic specimen: Mt II with a lateral expansion caudal
to Mt III; Mt III proximally narrow distally wide; distal
end of Mt III is incipiently ginglymoidal; pedal digit II
with trenchant ungual phalanx. These diagnostic features
clearly indicate that the theropod specimen from the Naze
on James Ross Island, is a dromaeosaur. However, the
Naze dromaeosaur is much less derived than
dromaeosaurs or the sister family Troodontidae of a
similar Late Cretaceous age from Laurasia, in that the
metatarsals are not long and slender and thus, generally
being longer than the length of the phalanges on digit III.
The metatarsal length may also be a function of size, but
Achillobatar, which is similar in size to the Naze
dromaeosaur also has elongate metatarsals. Two
additional plesiomorphic features of the Naze
dromaeosaur are the juxtaposition of the ascending
process of the astragalus and the anterior distal tibia
without a well-defined fossa on the tibia and the incipient
ginglymoidal MtII/digit II joint. Thus in many ways, the
Naze dromaeosaur more closely resembles Early
Cretaceous dromaeosaurs such as Deinonychus and
Utahraptor rather than contemporaneous dromaeosaurids,
Velociraptor and Dromaeosaurus or regional close (i.e.
South American) species like Neuquenraptor (Novas and
Pol, 2005) or Buitreraptor (Makovichy et al., 2005).
Biogeography
Dromaeosaurids were originally thought to have
originated in North America in the Early Cretaceous
(Barremian), dispersed to Asia and then into Europe
(Ostrom, 1990). The Asian record now extends back to
the Barremian (Xu et al., 2000) and the two new South
American (Gondwanan) species have now been recorded
from earlier time frames of Cenomanian and Coniacian
ages (Makovichy et al., 2005; Novas and Pol, 2005
respectively). By the middle of the Cretaceous,
dromaeosaurs are in Asia, North America and South
America. The plesiomorphic nature of the ankle and pes
of the Naze dromaeosaur is supportive of a hypothesis
that dromaeosaurs were in fact cosmopolitan in their
distribution and then fragmented vicariously into a
Gondwanan clade that was separate from the Laurasian
radiation (Makovichy et al., 2005; Novas and Pol, 2005).
Consequently, the Naze dromaeosaur may in fact be a
latest Cretaceous remnant of the Early Cretaceous,
cosmopolitan, basal stock of dromaeosaurids.
The majority of the dinosaur assemblage from the
Antarctic Peninsula (the megalasaur-like theropod, the
nodosaur, the iguanodontid and the hypsilophodontid) are
remnants of a cosmopolitan dinosaur fauna more typical
of other areas at earlier times (e.g. mid-Cretaceous of
North America and Australia; Case et al., 2003). The
recovery of a dromaeosaur from the Maastrichtian of
Antarctica up until recently would have been viewed in
much the same way as the hadrosaur is viewed, that is as
a North American immigrant into the Antarctic region.
However, the occurrences of dromaeosaurs in the mid-
Cretaceous of South America and the retention of
plesiomorphic characters in the Naze dromaeosaur tell a
different biogeographic tale. Rather, the dromaeosaurs,
like most of the Antarctic Peninsula dinosaur fauna, is a
relict of a cosmopolitan dinosaur distribution that is still
present in Antarctica until the end of the “Age of
Dinosaurs” at the end of the Cretaceous.
Acknowledgements. This work was supported by The National
Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs grants 0003844 (to J.
Case) and 0087972 (to J. Martin). Additionally, we would like to thank
Raytheon Polar Services for their logistical support for this project with
special thanks to Melissa Rider and John Evans. We would like to
thank Captain Mike Terminal and the crew of the RS Laurence M.
Gould for getting us there and getting us back.
10th International Symposium on Antarctic Earth Sciences
4
References
Cambiaso, A., Novas, F., Lirio, J.M., and Nunez, H. 2002. Un Nuevo
dinosaurio ornithopodo del Cretacio Superior de la Isla James Ross,
Peninsula Antartica. VIII Congresso Argentino de Paleontologia y
Bioestratigrafia, Resumenes, p.61.
Case, J.A., J.E. Martin, D.S. Chaney, M. Reguero, S.A. Marenssi, S.M.
Santillana and M.O. Woodburne. 2000. The first duck-billed
dinosaur (Hadrosauridae) from Antarctica. Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology 20(3):612-614.
Case, J.A., J.E. Martin, D.S. Chaney and M. Reguero. 2003 Late
Cretaceous Dinosaurs from the Antarctic Peninsula: Remnant or
Immigrant Fauna? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23(3
supplement):39A.
Crame, J.A., D. Pirrie, J.B. Riding, M.R.A. Thomson. 1991.
Campanian-Maastrichtian (Cretaceous) stratigraphy of the James Ross
Island area, Antarctica. Journal of the Geological Society, London
148:1125-1140.
Crame, J. A., J. E. Francis, D. J . Cantrill, and D. Pirrie. 2004.
Maastrichtian stratigraphy of Antarctica. Cretaceous Research 25:
411-423.
Gasparini, Z., E. Olivero, R. Scasso and C. Rinaldi. 1987. Un
ankylosaurio (Reptila, Ornithischia) campaniano en el continente
antartico. Anias IV Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, Rio de
Janeiro 1:131-141.
Hooker, J.J., A.C. Milne, and S. Sequira. 1992. An ornithopod dinosaur
from the Late Cretaceous of West Antarctica. Antarctic Science
3:331-332.
Makovichy, P.J., S. Apesteguia and F.L. Agnolin. 2005. The earliest
dromaeosaurid theropod from South America. Nature 437:1007-
1011.
Molnar, R.E., L.A. Angriman and Z. Gasparini. 1996. An Antarctic
Cretaceous theropod. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum
39(3):669-674.
Novas, F.E. and D. Pol 2005. New evidence on deinonychosaurian
dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Nature 433:858-
861.
Ostrom, J.H. 1990. Dromaeosauridae. In D.B. Weishampel, P. Dodson
and H. Osmolska (eds.), The Dinosauria. University of Claifornia
Press, Berkeley, p. 269-279.
Xu, X., Z. Zhou and X. Wang. 2000. The smallest known non-avian
theropod dinosaur. Nature 408:705-708.