ArticlePDF Available

Potassium Fertilization Effects on Alfalfa in a Mediterranean Climate

Wiley
Agronomy Journal
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Potassium fertilization rates for alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) have been increasing with intensive cropping systems or decreasing with policies that generally lead to reduced fertilizer inputs. In this case, nutrient buildup or maintenance of high soil test levels may not be desirable and drawdown of K reserves may be beneficial in the short term. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of potassium fertilization of alfalfa in areas of high soil exchangeable K levels and long growing seasons. A field experiment was established under irrigation from 1993 to 1997 in the Mediterranean environment of the Ebro Valley (Spain) on a silty clay loam soil. The treatments were five annual rates of K (0, 41.5, 83, 166, and 332 kg K ha-1) and two rates of K (166 and 332 kg K ha-1) applied prior to seeding on two alfalfa cultivars. The average annual dry matter (DM) yield was 21.5 Mg ha-1 and showed a small linear response to K fertilization (Pr > F = 0.0589). Total K removal in the herbage increased linearly with each rate of K and reached 1728 kg K ha-1 with the application of 332 kg K ha-1 yr-1, compared with 1546 kg K ha-1 without K fertilization. At the end of the experiment, soil ammonium acetate extractable K (Ke) increased little with K rates, and the differences were observed only in the first 30 cm of depth. Despite the uptake of 1546 kg K ha-1, soil Ke values did not change appreciably, suggesting that much of the K uptake was derived from the fertilizer and from nonexchangeable soil K fractions. Although K fertilization slightly increased alfalfa DM yields in this high testing Mediterranean soil, the economic benefit of this limited response does not justify the expense.
Content may be subject to copyright.
SOIL FERTILITY
Potassium Fertilization Effects on Alfalfa in a Mediterranean Climate
Jaime Lloveras,* Javier Ferran, Jaime Boixadera, and Jordi Bonet
ABSTRACT kg
1
, using short-season dormant or semidormant culti-
vars with reported annual DM yields of alfalfa that
Potassium fertilization rates for alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) have
ranged generally between 10 and 15 Mg ha
1
in three
been increasing with intensive cropping systems or decreasing with
policies that generally lead to reduced fertilizer inputs. In this case,
to four harvests per season (Markus and Battle, 1965;
nutrient buildup or maintenance of high soil test levels may not be
Lutz, 1973; Smith, 1975; Rominger et al., 1976; Fixen
desirable and drawdown of K reserves may be beneficial in the short
and Ludwick, 1983; Barbarick, 1985; Alva et al., 1986;
term. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of
Sheaffer et al., 1986; Burmester et al., 1991; Razmjoo
potassium fertilization of alfalfa in areas of high soil exchangeable K
and Henderlong, 1997). The reported results of these
levels and long growing seasons. A field experiment was established
trials show that the effects to the applications of K varied
under irrigation from 1993 to 1997 in the Mediterranean environment
with production practices, growing conditions, and soil
of the Ebro Valley (Spain) on a silty clay loam soil. The treatments
K contents, ranging from no DM yield response with
were five annual rates of K (0, 41.5, 83, 166, and 332 kg K ha
1
) and
the application of 300 kg K ha
1
with a soil test level
two rates of K (166 and 332 kg K ha
1
) applied prior to seeding on
of 75 mg K kg
1
(Lutz, 1973) to a maximum response
two alfalfa cultivars. The average annual dry matter (DM) yield was
21.5 Mg ha
1
and showed a small linear response to K fertilization
with the application 448 kg K ha
1
for a soil with extract-
(Pr F0.0589). Total K removal in the herbage increased linearly
able K of 55 mg K kg
1
(Rominger et al., 1976). These
with each rate of K and reached 1728 kg K ha
1
with the application
studies show that in general, K application increased
of 332 kg K ha
1
yr
1
, compared with 1546 kg K ha
1
without K
plant and soil K concentrations.
fertilization. At the end of the experiment, soil ammonium acetate
Although a survey of soil fertility and forage manage-
extractable K (K
e
) increased little with K rates, and the differences
ment specialists indicates that additional K is rarely
were observed only in the first 30 cm of depth. Despite the uptake
recommended when the concentration of exchangeable
of 1546 kg K ha
1
, soil K
e
values did not change appreciably, suggesting
K is greater than 300 kg ha
1
(about 150 mg K kg
1
)in
that much of the K uptake was derived from the fertilizer and from
the surface soil layer (Lanyon and Smith, 1985), the
nonexchangeable soil K fractions. Although K fertilization slightly
sufficiency levels for adequate soil K are much less clear
increased alfalfa DM yields in this high testing Mediterranean soil, the
economic benefit of this limited response does not justify the expense.
(Lanyon and Griffith, 1988). In fact, results from Colo-
rado (Barbarick, 1985), on soils with high levels of ex-
changeable K (from 308 to 335 mg K kg
1
) under irriga-
tion, found that application of 375 kg ha
1
of K increased
A
lfalfa fertilizer applications have been changing 4-yr DM yields from 52.7 to 55.6 Mg ha
1
, showing that
with production practices. They have been increas- alfalfa yield responses to K applied to a soil high in K
ing with more intensive cropping systems (Smith, 1975; are possible.
Lanyon and Griffith, 1988; Vough and Decker, 1992) In France, Ballif and Duthil (1976) obtained the high-
or decreasing and even withheld (Havlin et al., 1984; est alfalfa DM yields with applications of 166 and 325
Jouany et al., 1996; Swoboda, 1998) due to changes in kgKha
1
yr
1
, raising the 2-yr DM production from
agricultural and environmental policies (EU Commis- 15.4 Mg ha
1
to 17.6 Mg ha
1
. Soil exchangeable K levels
sion, 1993) that lead generally to lower prices. With in the top 20 cm of nonfertilized plots were reduced
reducing agricultural profits, nutrient buildup or mainte- from 270 to 80 mg kg
1
. Higher responses to K were
nance of high soil test levels may not be economically reported by Kafkafi et al. (1977), in irrigated eastern
desirable and drawdown of K reserves may be economi- Mediterranean conditions, where yields were raised
cal in the short term (Havlin et al., 1984; Mallarino et from 15.2 Mg ha
1
with0Kto20.9 Mg DM ha
1
with
al., 1991). Therefore, there is interest in designing field applications of 316 kg K ha
1
in a soil with initial K
experiments to evaluate the response to K fertilization values of about 180 mg K kg
1
.
in alfalfa, which has a high K requirement, in order to Although it is known that alfalfa can remove large
maintain high yields in intensive production systems amounts of K in intensive production systems, there are
(Lanyon and Smith, 1985). limited data on K fertilization from areas with high soil
Research involving applications of K for alfalfa has K levels (Havlin et al., 1984) or long growing seasons
been conducted mainly in the northeastern or midwest- with alfalfa dormancy ratings of 8 and 9 and crop yields
ern regions of the USA on soils responsive to this nutri- of 20 to 25 Mg ha
1
yr
1
under irrigation (Dovrat, 1993;
ent with soil test K levels between 30 and 230 mg K Kafkafi et al., 1977; Lloveras et al., 1998).
In the Mediterranean areas of southern Europe, pres-
UdL-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 177, 25198, Lleida, Spain. Received
1 Apr. 1999. *Corresponding author (jaume.lloveras@irta.es).
Abbreviations: DM, dry matter; K
e
, soil ammonium acetate extract-
able potassium.Published in Agron. J. 93:139–143 (2001).
139
140
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, VOL. 93, JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2001
were calculated on this basis. Ground (1-mm screen) plant
ent recommendations of between 200 and 350 kg K ha
1
tissue samples were analyzed for several nutrients. Total N
yr
1
are normally based on the amounts of K removed
was analyzed by a conventional Kjeldahl method. Potassium,
by the crop (Hidalgo, 1969; Le Gall et al., 1992). In this
Ca, P, Mg, B, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn contents were analyzed by
research we evaluated the effect of K fertilization on
inductively coupled argon plasma spectrophotometry (Poly-
alfalfa yield and nutrient uptake in irrigated production
scan 61E; Thermo Jarrell-Ash Corporation, Franklin, MA)
systems with high soil exchangeable K levels in a Medi-
after digesting the calcinated plant ashes with hydrocholoric
terranean climate.
acid.
Soil samples for determination of exchangeable K were
taken from every plot and from the 0- to 30- and 30- to 60-cm
MATERIALS AND METHODS
soil depths at the end of each growing season (prior to fertiliza-
The experiments were conducted under irrigation during tion). In addition, at the final sampling on December 1997,
four growing seasons (1994 to 1997) at the IRTA-University core soil samples also were taken from a 60- to 90-cm depth.
of Lleida research fields at Palau de Anglesola (Ebro Valley, Soil samples collected prior to planting were air-dried but all
Spain, 4139N, 051E, altitude 180 m). The soil was an subsequent soil samples were analyzed as field moist samples.
Oxyaquic Xerofluvent, representative of the Ebro Valley, with Thus K data for the first year prior to seeding and from
a silty clay loam texture (397 g kg
1
clay). subsequent years unfortunately cannot be directly compared.
Analysis of a composite sample (0–30 cm depth) collected
from the experimental site revealed that pH (water) was 8.4,
available P was 14 mg kg
1
(Olsen method), available K was
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
317 mg kg
1
(NH
4
OAc method), organic matter was 14 g kg
1
,
Forage Yields
and CaCO
3
equivalent was 310 g kg
1
. The exchangeable bases
Ca, Mg, Na, and K were 33, 4.91, 0.25, and 0.89 cmol
c
kg
1
Although the main effect of K was not significant in
respectively, whereas at 30 to 60 cm they were 33, 4.92, 0.27,
any year or for the total 4-yr production, the total 4-yr
and 0.53 cmol
c
kg
1
respectively. The total cation exchange
herbage DM yields showed a linear response (Pr F
capacity was 39.06 and 38.7 cmol
c
kg
1
for the 0- to 30- and
0.0589) to K fertilization rates (Table 1). The mean of
30- to 60-cm depths, respectively. An estimation of minerals
the two highest rates (166 and 332 kg K ha
1
yr
1
) was
in the clay fraction with X-ray showed that illite was the
87.4 Mg DM ha
1
whereas the control and the 41.5 kg
dominant mineral (Roquero, 1979). The average temperature
K annual rate yielded a mean of 84.5 Mg DM ha
1
,
is 11.1C and the average rainfall is 433 mm.
which is a difference of about 2.8 Mg DM ha
1
in 4 yr
The treatments were seven K fertilizer rates broadcast on
two adapted alfalfa cultivars, ‘Arago
´n’ and ‘P5929’ (dormancy
(0.70 Mg DM ha
1
per year). The lower yields observed
ratings 8–9). The fertilizer treatments, applied as KCl, con-
in the fourth year of production are common in the
sisted of five annual broadcast rates of 0, 41.5, 83, 166, and
irrigated areas of the Ebro Valley, mainly due to stem
332 kg ha
1
of K and two other treatments of 166 and 332 kg
nematode (Ditylenchus dipsaci) (Lloveras et al., 1994).
ha
1
of K prior to seeding. Fertilizer treatments following
The cultivar fertilizer treatment interaction was not
the initial preplant applications were topdressed in winter
significant, although ‘Arago
´n’ alfalfa yielded (89.7 Mg
(January). The crop also received an annual application of 44
DM ha
1
) significantly more than ‘P5929’ (82.3 Mg DM
kg P ha
1
. At seeding the plots were also fertilized with 3 kg
ha
1
). No significant yield differences were found when
Bha
1
,49kgMgha
1
, and 62 kg S ha
1
.
comparing annual fertilizer rates of 41.5 and 83 kg K
The experiment was seeded on 16 Sept. 1993 at a seeding
ha
1
yr
1
applied topdressed with the same total 4-yr
rate of 20 kg ha
1
in rows 20 cm apart. Plots were 1.5 6m.
amount of K applied at once at seeding (166 and 332
The previous crop was wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plots
were irrigated every 12 to 16 d from April to September,
kgKha
1
). This result suggests that in medium textured
receiving a total of about 900 mm of water per growing season.
soils, with the rates of K studied, all the fertilizer, at
The experimental design was a split-plot in space and time
least up to 332 kg K ha
1
, could be applied at seeding
(Steel and Torrie, 1980) with four replications. The K treat-
without any yield depression.
ments were the main plots and the alfalfa cultivars the sub-
The small yield increases obtained in this study (2.8
plots. The results were subjected to analysis of variance with
the General Linear Model procedure of the Statistic Analysis
Table 1. Alfalfa yield response to K fertilization. Mean of two cul-
System (SAS Institute, 1988).
tivars.
Alfalfa yield was determined by harvesting the whole plot.
Six cuttings were harvested each year at the mid to full flow-
Dry matter yields
ering stage, except for the first and the last cut of the year,
Cultivar
where the crop does not flower because of the photoperiod.
Treatment K 1994 1995 1996 1997 Total Arago
´n P5929
The first harvest was about mid-April and the last at the end
of October with a period of about 30 d between harvests
kg ha
1
Mg ha
1
(Lloveras et al., 1998). Insects were controlled by spraying
1 0 24.0 24.8 22.7 13.5 85.0 88.0 82.1
2 41.5 annually 23.7 24.8 21.9 13.7 84.0 87.8 80.3
0.1 kg ha
1
a.i. fenvalerate [cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl
3 83 annually 23.1 24.6 22.6 15.4 85.8 89.7 81.9
4-cholo-(1-methylethyl)benzeneacetate] two to five times per
4 166 annually 24.6 24.8 23.0 14.7 87.2 91.7 82.6
year. Weeds were controlled by applying 1 kg ha
1
a.i. hexazi-
5 332 annually 23.9 25.5 23.6 14.6 87.6 90.2 85.1
none [3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-
6 166 at seeding 23.9 25.0 22.9 14.1 85.9 89.4 82.5
7 332 at seeding 23.7 25.2 22.3 15.1 86.4 90.8 81.9
2,4(1H,3H)-dione] in January. The alleys between blocks were
maintained weed free by rotary tilling.
Main K treatment effect NS† NS NS NS NS NS NS
Linear (Treatments 1 to 5) NS NS NS NS * NS NS
A 500-g wet sample of herbage was collected from each plot
at each harvest for moisture determination and subsequent
* Significant at the 0.05 probability level.
Nonsignificant.
chemical analysis. Samples were dried at 70C and DM yields
LLOVERAS ET AL.: K FERTILIZATION ON ALFALFA IN MEDITERRANEAN CONDITIONS
141
Table 2. Annual and 4-yr weighted average concentrations of K, N, P, Ca, and Mg in alfalfa herbage under K fertilization treatments.
Annual K concentration 4-yr weighted average concentrations
Treatment K 1994 1995 1996 1997 K N P Ca Mg
kg ha
1
gkg
1
gkg
1
1 0 24.3 16.8 14.4 16.2 18.1 30.7 2.33 22.9 3.27
2 41.5 annually 23.8 17.5 13.9 16.0 18.1 31.1 2.35 21.9 3.24
3 83 annually 25.0 18.3 14.9 16.8 18.9 30.9 2.38 22.8 3.24
4 166 annually 24.5 17.9 15.1 17.7 18.9 30.8 2.32 22.7 3.22
5 332 annually 25.5 18.2 16.4 18.2 19.7 31.0 2.31 21.9 3.06
6 166 at seeding 24.5 17.0 14.3 15.7 18.1 31.0 2.33 22.7 3.24
7 332 at seeding 25.6 17.8 14.3 16.4 18.8 30.7 2.37 22.6 3.24
Main K treatment effect * NS† ** ** ** NS NS NS **
Linear (Treatments 1 to 5) ** NS ** ** ** NS NS NS **
No.6and7vsNo.2and3 NSNS NS NS NSNSNSNSNS
* Significant at the 0.05 probability level.
** Significant at the 0.01 probability level.
Nonsignificant.
Mg DM ha
1
in 4 yr) are similar to the responses re- exchangeable K, found that the K concentration of the
ported by others on soils high in K (Jones et al., 1974; tissue increased from 8.9 to 20.5 g kg
1
when K fertiliza-
Havlin et al., 1984; Barbarick, 1985). The yield increases tion rates increased from 0 to 448 kg K ha
1
.
in our study were lower than the increases reported by In this study, herbage K concentration differences
Kafkafi et al. (1977) in Mediterranean conditions. They between treatments varied little with the age of the
increased DM yields from 15.2 Mg ha
1
with 0 K fertil- stand, probably because the differences in soil test levels
ization to 20.9 Mg ha
1
with 498 kg K ha
1
in a soil with between K treatments also were small (Table 3). The
an initial K content of about 180 mg K kg
1
.total amount of K removed with the herbage increased
These results suggest that in high yielding conditions linearly with applied K (Table 4). Removal of K reached
alfalfa yield increases with K fertilization are very lim- 1728 kg ha
1
with the application of 332 kg K ha
1
yr
1
,
ited in soils with high exchangeable K levels. compared with 1546 kg K ha
1
for the 0 K fertiliza-
tion treatment.
Herbage Mineral Concentrations
Average P and Ca concentrations in the herbage were
not significantly affected by increasing K rates (Table
The average 4-yr K concentration in the herbage and 2). A linear decrease in Mg concentrations, however,
average annual concentrations in three of four growing was seen with K fertilization rates, as has been reported
seasons increased linearly with increasing K fertilization in other studies (Smith, 1975; Rominger et al., 1976;
rates (Table 2). The small increase in K concentration, James et al., 1995). The observed P, Ca, and Mg concen-
from 18.1 to 19.7 g kg
1
with increasing K fertilization tration values were similar to those of other studies
rates, is quite similar to the results reported Barbarick conducted in the Ebro Valley and in the USA (Heras
(1985) and Havlin et al. (1984) in soils high in K.
and Montan
˜es, 1974; Smith, 1975; Sheaffer et al., 1986;
On soils responsive to K fertilization, the tissue con-
James et al., 1995).
centration of K presented a much higher increase.
The K treatments did not affect the N concentration
Sheaffer et al. (1986), in a soil with 35 mg K kg
1
, found
of the herbage, which suggests that the supply of K was
that K tissue contents increased from 11.4 to 25.3 g kg
1
already adequate for maximum N
2
fixation (Collins et
when K fertilization rates increased from 0 to 334 kg K
ha
1
. Smith (1975), in a soil with about 128 mg kg
1
of al., 1986).
Table 3. Soil ammonium acetate extractable K (K
e
) concentrations at different depths (cm) during the experiment.
K
e
concentration
1994 1995 1996 1997 (final harvest)1993†
Treatment K 0–30 0–30 30–60 0–30 30–60 0–30 30–60 0–30 30–60 60–90
kg ha
1
gkg
1
1 0 426 283 188 272 211 226 182 261 213 144
2 41.5 annually 417 279 187 276 217 221 184 279 205 159
3 83 annually 442 271 192 271 221 235 196 272 212 148
4 166 annually 461 259 201 275 219 231 192 279 208 140
5 332 annually 447 317 202 308 222 250 207 315 219 165
6 166 at seeding 427 258 200 269 231 217 182 244 200 136
7 332 at seeding 427 315 198 279 222 228 194 262 208 147
Main effect NS‡ NS NS NS ** NS ** NS NS
Linear (Treatments 1 to 5) NS NS * NS ** * ** NS NS
No. 6 and 7 vs No. 2 and 3 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
* Significant at the 0.05 probability level.
** Significant at the 0.01 probability level.
Initial soil test levels. Air-dried soil samples.
Nonsignificant.
142
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, VOL. 93, JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2001
Table 4. Balance of K in K fertilization treatments, 1994 –1997.
riod) without reaching levels expected from nutrient
balance estimates.
Fertilizer
Treatment K inputs Uptake Balance
Havlin et al. (1984), also working in calcareous soils
but with a low K
e
(126 mg K kg
1
), found a substantial
kg ha
1
kgKha
1
1 0 0 1546 1546
buildup of K
e
for the high K application rates. But they
2 41.5 annually 166 1524 1358
also found that the K
e
for the treatment with 0 kg K
3 83 annually 332 1628 1296
ha
1
changed little with time, suggesting that the high
4 166 annually 664 1654 990
5 332 annually 1328 1728 400
illite content may account for the observed K buff-
6 166 at seeding 166 1561 1395
ering capacity.
7 332 at seeding 332 1631 1299
The results of this study showed that K fertilization
Main effect ** **
had a limited (p0.059) effect on alfalfa DM yield in
Linear (Treatments 1 to 5) ** **
No.6and7vsNo.2and3 NS NS
intensive Mediterranean production systems. However,
the economical benefit of this limited response to K by
** Significant at the 0.01 probability level.
Nonsignificant.
alfalfa does not justify the cost of fertilization. The re-
sults also showed that rates of K usually considered high
were not sufficient to offset the K removed by the alfalfa.
Soil Extractable Potassium
Soil extractable K values prior to alfalfa seeding can-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
not be used together with the values collected in other
We express our gratitude to COPOSA (Comercializadora
seasons. The seeding year values were higher than in
de Potasa S.A.) who partially supported the study and in
any other year because in that year soil analyses were
particular to J. Salazar. We also thank J. Diaz Espada, J.
conducted only on dry samples, which often result in
Llobera, M. Baga, J. Del Campo, A. Lopez, J.L. Millera, J.A.
different values than determinations made with moist
Betbese, and R. Mestre from UdL-IRTA for their field and
soils (Mengel and Kirkby, 1980).
laboratory assistance as well as Dr. R. Salvador, A. Mallarino,
Soil K measured at the end of each of the four growing
P. Hinz, and I.C. Anderson of Iowa State University for their
seasons is shown in Table 3. The K
e
values in the 30-cm
technical and statistical assistance. Dr. F. Macias of the Uni-
depth showed significant linear effects with K fertiliza-
versidad de Santiago de Compostela provided the analysis of
tion, although with low slope. The increase in soil K
e
the clay minerals.
concentration in the 30-cm depth (24 to 54 mg kg
1
)
with the application of 332 kg K ha
1
yr
1
in the last REFERENCES
two growing seasons was small compared with the high
Alva, A.K., L.E. Lanyon, and K.T. Leath. 1986. Production of alfalfa
rate applied. The lack of significant differences or trends
in Pennsylvania soils of differing wetness. Agron. J. 78:469–473.
among treatments in soil layers below the 30-cm depth
Ballif, J.L., and P. Duthil. 1976. Recherche de l’equilibre potassium-
magnesium dans la fertilisation de la luzerne en Champagne cray-
suggests that although alfalfa is a crop with a high poten-
euse. Comptes Rendus Academie d’Agriculture de France 8:
tial for subsoil exploitation (De Nobili et al., 1990; Pe-
515–528.
terson and Smith, 1973), the upper 30 cm of soil was
Barbarick, K.A. 1985. Potassium fertilization of alfalfa on a soil high
most affected by K removal. Moreover, the highest rates
in potassium. Agron. J. 77:442–445.
of K did not significantly increase subsoil K
e
values. The
Burmester, C.H., G.L. Mullins, and D.M. Ball. 1991. Potassium fertil-
ization effects on yield and longevity of established alfalfa. Com-
average K
e
at the 0- to 30- or 30- to 60-cm depths did
mun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 22:2047–2062.
not change appreciably from year to year. These results
Collins, M., D.J. Lang, and K.A. Kelling. 1986. Effects of phosphorus,
suggest that alfalfa uptake or K fertilization scarcely
potassium and sulfur on alfalfa nitrogen-fixation under field condi-
influenced the K
e
levels.
tions. Agron. J. 78:959–963.
De Nobili, M., L.V. Antisari, and P. Sequi. 1990. K-uptake from
The balance between K uptake and fertilizer inputs
subsoil. p. 133–144. In IPI (ed.) Proc. of the 22nd Colloquium of
(Table 4) shows that 332 kg K ha
1
yr
1
(1328 kg K
the Int. Potash Inst., Soligorsk, Russia. 18–23 June 1990. Int. Potash
ha
1
in 4 yr) was not sufficient to offset the uptake of
Inst., Bern, Switzerland.
K. The differences in soil K
e
values in the 0- to 90-cm
Dovrat, A. 1993. Irrigated forage production. Developments in Crop
depth between plots that received no K fertilization and
Science 24. Elsevier Science Publ., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
EU Commission. 1993. Our agricultural future. Official Publ. of the
the plots with the highest rates (332 kg K ha
1
yr
1
)
European Union, Luxembourg.
were, in the 90-cm depth, only 81 mg K kg
1
(699–618
Fixen, P.E., and A.E. Ludwick. 1983. Phosphorus and potassium fertil-
mgKkg
1
). This amount seems to account for most
ization of irrigated alfalfa on calcareous soils: I. Soil test mainte-
of the differences in the K balance between the two
nance requirements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:107–112.
Havlin, J.L., D.G. Westfall, and H.M. Golus. 1984. Six years of phos-
treatments (1546 and 400 kg K ha
1
), since 1 mg K
phorus and potassium fertilization of irrigated alfalfa on calcareous
kg
1
of soil represents about 11.7 kg ha
1
of K
e
for the
soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:331–336.
90-cm depth, assuming a soil bulk density of 1.3 g cm
3
.
Heras, L., and L. Montan
˜es. 1974. Equilibrio y estado nutritivos de
The 198 kg ha
1
(1146–948 kg ha
1
) of nonaccounted
la alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivada sobre tres tipos de suelo.
K could come from nonexchangeable K forms, as
Anales de la Estacio
´n Experimental de Aula Dei. 12:146–155.
Hidalgo, F. 1969. El abonado de la alfalfa. Asociacio
´n de Investigacio
´n
pointed out by Lee and Metson (1977) and Vough and
para la Mejora de la Alfalfa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Decker (1992). Similar findings were reported by others.
James, D.W., C.J. Hurst, and T.A. Tindall. 1995. Alfalfa cultivar re-
Jounay et al. (1996), working with calcareous soils in
sponse to phosphorus and potassium deficiency: Elemental compo-
southwest France, reported that the K
e
content of non-
sition of the herbage. J. Plant Nutr. 18:2447–2464.
Jones, G.D., J.A. Lutz, and E.B. Hale. 1974. Effects of fertilization
fertilized plots declined only slightly (over a 25-yr pe-
LLOVERAS ET AL.: K FERTILIZATION ON ALFALFA IN MEDITERRANEAN CONDITIONS
143
and irrigation on yield and potassium content of alfalfa and on Markus, D.K., and W.R. Battle. 1965. Soil and plant responses to
available soil potassium. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 5:155–163. long-term fertilization of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Agron. J.
Jouany, C., B. Colomb, and M. Bosc. 1996. Long-term effects of 57:613–616.
potassium fertilization on yields and fertility status of calcareous Mengel, K., and E. Kirkby. 1980. Potassium in crop production. Adv.
soils of south-west France. Eur. J. Agron. 5:287–294. Agron. 33:59–110.
Kafkafi, U., R. Gilat, D. Yoles, and Y. Noy. 1977. Studies on fertiliza- Peterson, L.A., and D. Smith. 1973. Recovery of K
2
SO
4
by alfalfa
tion of field-grown irrigated alfalfa. Plant Soil 46:165–173. after placement at different depths in a low fertility soil. Agron.
Lanyon, L.E., and W.K. Griffith. 1988. Nutrition and fertilizer use. J. 65:769–772.
p. 333–372. In A.A. Hanson et al. (ed.) Alfalfa and alfalfa improve- Razmjoo, K., and P.R. Henderlong. 1997. Effect of potassium, sulfur,
ment. Agron. Monogr. 29. ASA, Madison, WI. boron, and molybdenum fertilization on alfalfa production and
Lanyon, L.E., and F.W. Smith. 1985. Potassium nutrition of alfalfa herbage macronutrient contents. J. Plant Nutr. 20:1681–1696.
and other forage legumes: Temperate and tropical. p. 861–893. In Rominger, R.S., D. Smith, and L.A. Peterson. 1976. Yield and chemi-
R.D. Munson (ed.) Potassium in agriculture. ASA, Madison, WI. cal composition of alfalfa as influenced by high rates of K top-
Lee, R., and J. Metson. 1977. Potassium removal from soil by lucerne dressed as KCl and K
2
SO
4
. Agron. J. 68:573–577.
over three years and the effect of potassium topdressing. N.Z. J. Roquero, C. 1979. The potential productivity of Mediterranean soils.
Agric. Res. 20:185–192. In IPI (ed.) Soils in Mediterranean type climates and their yield
Le Gall, A., J.D. Arnaud, P. Guy, H. Bousquet, A. Pflimlin, and Ph. potential. Proc. 14th Colloquium Int. Potash Inst., Sevilla, Spain.
Planquaert. 1992. La Luzerne Culture-Utilization. Groupement Int. Potash Inst., Bern, Switzerland.
National Interprofessionel des Semences-Institut Tecnique de l’El- SAS Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 6.03. SAS Inst.,
evage Bovin-Institut Tecnique des Cereals et des Fourrages, Paris. Cary, NC.
Lloveras, J., J. Ferran, A. Alvarez, and L. Torres. 1998. Harvest Sheaffer, C.C., M.P. Russelle, O.B. Hesterman, and R.E. Stucker.
management effects on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) production and 1986. Alfalfa response to potassium, irrigation and harvest manage-
quality in Mediterranean areas. Grass Forage Sci. 53:88–92. ment. Agron. J. 78:464–468.
Lloveras, J., C. Pedros, and J. Soldevila. 1994. Effect of nematodes Smith, D. 1975. Effects of potassium topdressing a low fertility silt
in the seasonal forage production of alfalfa cultivars in irrigated loam soil on alfalfa herbage yields and composition and on soil K
areas of the Ebro Valley (Spain). p. 254–255. In Eucarpia/FAO values. Agron. J. 67:60–64.
‘Medicago’ Meeting, Lusignan, France. 4–8 Sept. 1994. FAO Steel, R.D., and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statis-
REUR Tech. Ser. 36. FAO, Rome. tics: A biometrical approach. McGraw–Hill, New York.
Lutz, J.A. 1973. Effects of potassium fertilization on yield and K Swoboda, R. 1998. Wasting money on fertilizer. Wallaces Farmer
content of alfalfa and on available subsoil K. Commun. Soil Sci.
123(15):15–16.
Plant Anal. 4:57–65.
Vough, L., and M. Decker. 1992. An alfalfa management program
Mallarino, A.P., J.R. Webb, and A.M. Blackmer. 1991. Soil test values
for optimun yields and quality. Better Crops Plant Food
and grain yields during 14 years of potassium fertilization of corn
and soybeans. J. Prod. Agric. 4:562–566. (Spring) 76:24–26.
... Additionally, Heuschele et al. (2023) provided supporting evidence to show no differences (p > 0.05) in yield and leaf-to-stem ratio of alfalfa fertilized with K at Waseca, MN. These findings were consistent with earlier studies that found no or minimal alfalfa response to K fertilization (Jungers et al., 2019;Lloveras et al., 2001Lloveras et al., , 2012Yost et al., 2011) and further supported the knowledge that applying K to alfalfa grown in soils ...
... For example, in some soils, STK values may suggest the need for K application, but when K fertilization is withheld, the crop is still able to remove enough K from the soil to produce a high-yield response (Bell et al., 2021). A study by Lloveras et al. (2001) in the Mediterranean environment of the Ebro Valley in Spain found that different alfalfa cultivars do not respond to the same K rate and further stated that K fertility recommendation in alfalfa can vary based on STK levels and cultivar. ...
Article
Full-text available
Researchers have extensively studied and documented the effects of potassium (K) fertility on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Yet, additional research is needed to determine how interactions of K, cultivar, and harvest management influence the K needs of alfalfa. To explore these interactions, we conducted 5 years of field research at the University of Wyoming James C. Hageman Sustainable Agriculture Research and Extension Center in Lingle, WY. Treatments were (a) four K rates (0, 56, 112, and 168 kg K2O ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) applied before planting in the fall of 2016 and after the final harvest in the fall of 2017–2020, (b) two cultivars (Hi‐Gest 360 and AFX 457), and (c) two harvest times (early harvest, late bud to early [10%] bloom, and late harvest, 7 days after early harvest), arranged in a 4 × 2 × 2 factorial under random complete blocks with four replications. At 168 kg K2O ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ and early harvest, a consistently significant (p < 0.05) higher yield response was observed. The same response was seen at 112 kg K2O ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ and late harvest. This occurred at a site with moderate‐to‐high soil K levels throughout the study period. There was a linear (p < 0.001, R² = 0.66) and quadratic (p = 0.006, R² = 0.61) response of forage accumulation to K rate at early and late harvest, respectively. Similar trends were also seen for stem count, relative water content, root uptake of K, and tissue K. Time of harvest showed immense potential for optimizing K's effect for a consistent high‐yield response. However, fertilizing alfalfa with 112 kg K2O ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ gave the most profitable production under both harvest times. If K fertilizer prices drop over time, high profits could be attained with higher K fertilization rates. After 3 years of production, average forage accumulation increased under an early harvest system and decreased under a late harvest system. Growers in Wyoming and similar regions are encouraged to consider fertilizing alfalfa with moderate K rates (∼112 kg K2O ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) on soils testing moderate‐to‐high in soil test K, implement a late harvest system for the first 3 years after planting, and transition to an early harvest system after the initial 3 years to maximize alfalfa profits.
... It is noted that the first and second cut consistently gave the highest protein content with a non-significant effect. This was consistent with Lloveras (2001) who reported the increase in alfalfa protein content from the first cutting and decreased in the third one. Probably the most important characteristic is the change in composition with advance toward maturity. ...
Article
Full-text available
This work aims to study the effect on the productivity and quality variation of alfalfa using the two different fertilization recipes: F1 and F2 along with two different cultivation method in soilless: coconut fiber bag CF, Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) and in soil So. Number of leaves, stem length, number of flowers, crude protein, fiber and ash content of alfalfa plants were measured during the three cuttings time of the production cycle. In the productivity phase, results showed that during the three cuttings repetition, the number of leaves, stem length and number of flowers of alfalfa were in favor of the treatment of coconut fiber bags and the F1 fertilization recipe (CF1) followed by NFT with a good interaction noticeable at this combination level (CF1) with the cutting 1. As for the quality variation phase, the results showed that the crude protein and ash content are in favor of alfalfa grown in soilless CF2; CF1; NFTF1 and NFTF2. As for fiber content, F1 was the most favorable and NFTF1 reported higher fiber content than coconut fiber bags. Concerning the cutting system, cut 1 had a large impact on chemical composition. In summary, alfalfa grown in soilless is more productive and succeeded in the production cycle and the quality variation of alfalfa.
... In their 1995 study, Meyer and Mathews [23] found no statistically significant difference between the values in the alfalfa forage for the first five harvests following the application of the two potassium fertilizer sources: potassium chloride and potassium sulfate. The average annual dry matter (DM) yield, according to a study by Lloveras et al. [24], was 21.5 t ha −1 , and it showed a small linear response to K fertilizer, even if it marginally boosted DM yields for alfalfa under irrigation in this very demanding Mediterranean soil. Berg et al. [18] observed no influence of K fertilization on the alfalfa population or shoot per plant . ...
Article
Full-text available
Sustainable management of potassium nutrition in alfalfa crop production is one of the major key factors for achieving optimum seed and biomass yields. An inappropriate supply of mineral potassium nutrition in alfalfa production could result in a decrease in biomass and grain yield production, leading to luxury consumption with cost implications. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a perennial leguminous forage crop known for its high protein content, nutritive value, biomass yield production, soil-improving abilities, and livestock feed. Potassium nutrition plays a crucial role in alfalfa production by influencing several physiological processes essential for biomass yield, growth, development, photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, and stress tolerance. Although several studies have been conducted regarding the role of potassium nutrition in agriculture productivity, only limited research has focused on crop-specific impacts. Therefore, this paper reviews (i) the significant role potassium nutrition plays in alfalfa production along with its implications for quality, yield, growth, and resistance to abiotic stress; (ii) the factors affecting the availability, absorption, and transport of potassium; (iii) the source of potassium and the consequences of inadequate availability; and (iv) highlights some strategies for mitigating potassium nutrient deficiency to optimize alfalfa productivity and sustainability in agricultural systems.
... Alfalfa contains high concentrations of Ca compared with other forages (Kincaid & Cronrath, 1983), so the significant decrease is not detrimental to plant health. Others have noted reductions in Mg in K limiting experiments (Lloveras et al., 2001;Smith et al., 1972). This reduction in Mg, however, remains within the ranges of values found in alfalfa hay (Meyer et al., 2002). ...
Article
Full-text available
Potassium (K) is an essential nutrient for plant growth. In K‐deficient soils, fertilization has been shown to increase herbage yield of alfalfa. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of K fertilization on alfalfa leaf and stem yield, forage quality, nutrient removal, and plant health of a nonlodging experimental germplasm. Five alfalfa rotations had K fertilizer applied at three rates (0, 186, and 372 kg K ha⁻¹) to soils already containing sufficient soil test K (223 mg kg⁻¹). No overall yield differences were found related to K application rates, though K removal in total herbage increased by 30–58% with K fertilization, depending on alfalfa stand age. Leaf:stem ratios were not impacted by K fertilization. The concentrations of B, Ca, and Na decreased with K fertilization, while K concentrations increased, which may have resulted in B deficiencies. Leaf in vitro digestibility decreased significantly with the application of K. There was no benefit to crown rot disease resistance with increased K fertilization. This study supports that the addition of K to already sufficient soils does not lead to any additional economic benefits and may reduce productivity due to the reduction of B uptake and in vitro digestibility.
... As a P-demanding plant, alfalfa's growth is sensitive to the soil P content; thus, improving P availability could benefit several physiological processes, including increasing photosynthesis, enhancing biological N fixation, and simulating the transformation of N (Sandral et al., 2019;Fan et al., 2016;Berg et al., 2005Berg et al., , 2007. It has also been found that K fertilization can increase yield (Macolino et al., 2013;Peters et al., 2005;Lloveras et al., 2001), decrease the CP content by reducing the leaf-to-stem ratio (Sheaffer et al., 1986;Smith, 1975), and increase the NDF and ADF contents, leading to a decrease in the RFV value (Jungers et al., 2019;Lissbrant et al., 2009). Our results suggest that soil nutrients strongly affect the spatial distribution of the alfalfa yield and quality in China by influencing alfalfa growth and development. ...
Article
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is the most valuable perennial forage crop, and assessing its yield and quality properties is essential to evaluate forage value of livestock production. However, regional patterns and controlling factors of the yield and quality of alfalfa have not been well documented. In this study, using a dataset of 7166 observations from 301 sites across the country collected from 334 publications, we explored the relationships between the yield and quality properties of alfalfa in China and the effects of environmental factors and management practices on them. The average dry matter yield of alfalfa was 11.18 ± 6.69 Mg ha⁻¹, with average crude protein, ether extract, crude fiber, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, crude ash, nitrogen-free extract, calcium, phosphorus and relative feed values of 19.05 ± 2.87%, 2.62 ± 0.97%, 27.16 ± 5.21%, 31.29 ± 5.58%, 40.48 ± 6.34%, 9.49 ± 1.59%, 38.67 ± 7.49%, 1.68 ± 0.55%, 0.25 ± 0.12%, and 151 ± 31.94, respectively. Alfalfa quality decreased with increasing yield. Geographically, alfalfa had higher yield and crude protein content in South China than in other regions. Quality was positively correlated with both precipitation and temperature, while yield showed a positive relationship with temperature but no significant relationship with precipitation. High soil nutrient availability (e. g., soil available nitrogen, SAN; soil available phosphorus, SAP; soil available potassium, SAK) improved the yield, while high SAN and SAP contents increased the crude protein content. The alfalfa yield increased and the quality decreased with advancing maturity and age, whereas increasing the number of harvests may benefit the quality. This study documents comprehensive information on the yield and quality of alfalfa and provides insights for policy makers for the effective management and sustainable development of alfalfa production.
... Jungers et al. 2 observed little increase in forage biomass yield but had negative effect on for age nutritive value. Barbarick 20 and Ll over as et al. 21 found that K fertilization slightly increased alfalfa forage yields but did not compensate the cost of K application. They did not recommend to use large amount of K fertilizer in the alfalfa field because the plant utilizes excess K without increasing yield. ...
Article
Full-text available
The United States is the largest producer of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) however there is still a wide variation in yield among states. Potassium (K) is one of the key plant macronutrients that affect alfalfa yield and stand persistence. To the best of our knowledge, the evaluation of K rates on alfalfa forage yield and quality attributes has not been done in the United States. Thus, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of K rates along with harvesting intervals (HI) and varieties on alfalfa dry matter yield (DMY), forage nutritive value, and soil K content. The experiment was carried out in a split-split plot with two HI (28 and 35-day after the first cut), two varieties (Hi–Gest 360: reduced-lignin and AFX 457: conventional), and four K application rates (0, 56, 112, and 168 kg K2O ha-1) in a randomized complete block with four replications. The results indicated that harvesting alfalfa at a shorter interval (28-day) resulted in higher dry matter yield and forage nutritive value than a longer harvest interval (35-day). Yield, nutritive values, and soil K content were, however, not significantly influenced by alfalfa variety and K rates. Further research is essential to quantify the actual trade-off between applied K and soil and plant K content in alfalfa production.
... In contrast, when the fertilizer-N rate is less than crop demand, soil N is depleted [59]. Therefore, the accumulation and loss of NO 3 -N in soil could be reduced by applying less amounts of fertilizer-N than or equal to that required for the optimal crop yield [25,60]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The development of robust nutrient management strategies have played a crucial role in improving crop productivity, profitability and nutrient use efficiency. Therefore, the implementation of efficient nutrient management stratigies is important for food security and environmental safety. Amongst the essential plant nutrients, managing nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based production systems is citically important to maximize profitable production with minimal negative environmental impacts. We investigated the effects of different fertilizer-N (viz. 0–240 kg N ha⁻¹; N0-N240) and fertilizer-K (viz. 0–90 kg K ha⁻¹; K0-K90) application rates on wheat productivity, nutrient (N and K) use efficiency viz. partial factor productivity (PFPN/K), agronomic efficiency (AEN/K), physiological efficiency (PEN/K), reciprocal internal use efficiency (RIUEN/K), and profitability in terms of benefit-cost (B-C) ratio, gross returns above fertilizer cost (GRAFC) and the returns on investment (ROI) on fertilizer application. These results revealed that wheat productivity, plant growth and yield attributes, nutrients uptake and use efficiency increased significantly (p<0.05)with fertilizer-N application, although the interaction effect of N x K application was statistically non-significant (p<0.05). Fertilizer-N application at 120 kg N ha⁻¹ (N120) increased the number of effective tillers (8.7%), grain yield (17.3%), straw yield (15.1%), total N uptake (25.1%) and total K uptake (16.1%) than the N80. Fertilizer-N application significantly increased the SPAD reading by ~4.2–10.6% with fertilizer-N application (N80-N240), compared with N0. The PFPN and PFPK increased significantly with fertilizer-N and K application in wheat. The AEN varied between 12.3 and 22.2 kg kg⁻¹ with significantly higher value of 20.8 kg kg⁻¹ in N120. Fertilizer-N application at higher rate (N160) significantly decreased the AEN by ~16.3% over N120. The N120treatment increased the AEK by ~52.6% than N80 treatment. Similarly the RIUEN varied between 10.6 and 25.6 kg Mg⁻¹ grain yield, and increased significantly by ~80.2% with N120 as compared to N0 treatment. The RIUEK varied between 109 and 15.1 kg Mg⁻¹ grain yield, and was significantly higher in N120 treatment. The significant increase in mean gross returns (MGRs) by ~17.3% and mean net returns (MNRs) by ~24.1% increased the B-C ratio by ~15.1% with N120 than the N80 treatment. Fertilizer-N application in N120 treatment increased the economic efficiency of wheat by ~24.1% and GRAFC by ~16.9%. Grain yield was significantly correlated with total N uptake (r = 0.932**, p<0.01), K uptake (r = 0.851**), SPAD value (r = 0.945**), green seeker reading (r = 0.956**), and the RIUEN (r = 0.910**). The artificial neural networks (ANNs) showed highly satisfactory performance in training and simulation of testing data-set on wheat grain yield. The calculated mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE) for wheat were 0.0087, 0.834 and 0.052, respectively. The well trained ANNs model was capable of producing consistency for the training and testing correlation (R² = 0.994**, p<0.01) between the predicted and actual values of wheat grain yield, which implies that ANN model succeeded in wheat grain yield prediction.
Article
Agriculture in the United States (US) is a major industry, which is the net exporter of food. The livestock sector is a centerpiece of the industry, and the base for this sector is forage resources. A forage-livestock production system is the largest economic agricultural sector in the US, and it feeds millions of people each day. More than half of the US land area has been devoted to cultivating forage crops mainly for livestock feed. In spite of the several options of forage crops available to growers to choose for production, the suitable choice often relies on the quality and quantity of hay that can be produced by the crop to meet production objectives. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), the world’s premier forage crop, remains to be the number one choice for livestock feed due to its ability to produce high yields of sustained nutritive value. However, recent data shows that on the national average, alfalfa hay yields are decreasing with a direct and indirect consequent effect on the nation’s economy. Implementing efficient agronomic management practices in the alfalfa production system is a step in the direction of successful production. Along with the initial soil fertility status, integrating production factors including phosphorus and potassium fertilization, cultivar, and harvest management can be advantageous to ensure an improved physiology of alfalfa for greater hay production in the long term.
Article
Full-text available
The objective of this work was to evaluate the application of silicate ultramafic alkaline rock, with different granulometry, as an alternative potassium source on the increase of soil fertility and on the nutritional status and biomass yield of the alfalfa and centrosema crops. The used soil was a Typic Ultisol with 27.4 mg dm-3 K and 733 g kg-1 clay. The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 4 × 2 + 1 factorial arrangement. The treatments consisted of two granulometries (<0.3 and 0.3–2.0 mm) of alkaline ultramafic rock (4.0% K2O), four K rates (0, 100, 150, and 300 mg kg-1), and an additional treatment with the application of 150 mg kg-1 K in the form of KCl (58% K2O). Both legumes were grown in a greenhouse and subjected to five successive harvests. In comparison with KCl, the application of silicate rock has the potential to increase K uptake and root and shoot dry weight yield in alfalfa and centrosema. Granulometry does not affect rock use efficiency, and alfalfa presents a better K efficiency recovery in the soil after successive harvests compared with centrosema; the inverse is observed for K use and K uptake efficiencies.
Chapter
This chapter reviews three main aspects of K+ in crop production—namely, K availability in the soil, the function of K+ in the plant, and potash fertilizer application. The soil is considered as a source of K+ to plant roots. The use of K+ in practical crop production is also emphasized in the discussions on the physiological role of K+ in the plant and in fertilizer application. The potassium status of a soil may be assessed on its content of K+-bearing minerals because the amount of these minerals present in a soil gives some indication of the potential source of K+ to plants. However, in terms of the ability of the soil to supply K+ to plant roots, the quantity of K+-bearing minerals plays only an indirect role. More important in determining the K+ supply to plants are the soil K+ fractions. These fractions, which have been established experimentally using different extraction techniques, are soil solution K+, K+ adsorbed to clay minerals or humus, and K+ present in minerals.
Article
Past fertilization may have increased the quantities of available K in many soils to levels not profitable for crop producers to maintain. To evaluate this possibility, the effects of annual K applications on soil test K (STK) values and yields of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown in rotation were studied from 1976 to 1989 at two sites in Iowa. Four annual K treatments ranging from 0 to 90 lb K/acre were superimposed on plots having various initial STK values that had been established by applying 0 to 1200 lb K/acre from 1971 to 1975. The rate of annual K required to maintain STK values increased with increases in initial STK values. Significant yield increases due to annual K additions were observed frequently in plots having STK values below the medium soil test class (68 to 100 ppm) and infrequently in plots having STK values above medium. At prevailing prices of grain and fertilizer, economic returns to investments on annual K applications for both crops were positive when STK values were less than 75 to 100 ppm and negative when STK values were above this range. The results suggest that crop producers could increase profits by not applying K fertilizer to soils testing above the medium STK range. Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left. Copyright © 1991. . Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
Article
Results are presented of a field trial held over 3 years on the Wairau plains near Blenheim, to examine the effects of three rales of potassium fertiliser (0, 250, and 500 kg/ha KCI) on the growth of lucerne, and on exchangeable K(Kc.) and non-exchangeable K (step K and Kc) levels in the soil. Fertiliser addition led to significant increases in lucerne yield, herbage K concentration, and K uptake. There were no significant treatment effects on % crude protein content or on Mg-uptake. Despite the removal of 571 kg/ha of K in the harvested lucerne under the nil fertiliser treatment during the trial, there were no significant decreases in Kc, step K, or Kc levels under this treatment, down to a depth of 60 cm. Samples taken below 60 cm, and samples of ground water, taken at the end of the trial, showed that the lucerne was unlikely to have obtained much of its K-uptake from these additional sources. With no large supply of K from other sources, the absence of any significant decrease in soil K levels under the nil treatment therefore suggested that the lucerne was obtaining K from a large volume of soil, in which case the expected decreases in soil K levels would be masked by soil variability. Under the 250 and 500 kg/ha treatments significant increases in Kc levels occurred in the surface layers of the soil. There were no significant increases in step K or Kc levels, although there was the possibility that some anomalous step K values were masking what appeared to be a large increase in step K levels in the surface layer of the soil under the 500 kg/ha treatment. Step K and Kc levels were very high for all soil depths examined and Kc levels low. Although a yield response was expected on the basis of the Kc levels, the results suggest that the response levels of 0.5 me./100g and 0.35 me./100 g, proposed for step K and Kc respectively for a grazed pasture situation, are not applicable to the growth of lucerne. There was also some indication that the proposed response level for Kc of 0.5–0.6 me./100 g may be too low with respect to lucerne.
Article
Long-term irrigated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. ) field experiments at two locations in Colorado left bracket Keith clay loam (Aridic Arqiustolls) and Ravola loam (Typic Torrifluvents) right bracket were established to (i) determine the magnitude and frequency of P (Phosphorus) and K (Potassium) fertilization required to maintain initial soil tests, and (ii) evaluate the residual value of soil and fertilizer P and K. Ten P and K treatments (3 annual, 1 triennial, and 1 initial application) were used. Alfalfa yield, P and K uptake, NaHCO//3-extractable P, and NH//4C//2H//3O//2-exchangeable K were measured over 6 production years. The results indicate very large P and K reserves exist in both soils and unless improved forage quality influences the economic benefit from P and K fertilizer application, fertilization of these soils would not be recommended.
Article
Field experiments with irrigated alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) were established in far eastern Colorado on a Keith soil and in far western Colorado on a Ravola soil in 1976. Concentrated superphosphate was applied at rates of 25 and 50 kg P/ha annually for 3 years or 75 kg P/ha in a single application at seeding. Muriate of potash was applied at rates of 140 and 280 kg K/ha annually for 3 years or 420 kg K/ha in a single application at seeding. Soil profile changes in NaHCO 3 ‐P and exchangeable K were determined. At a location having low to medium available‐P status (crop response to P expected), 2.2 times the P removed by the alfalfa was required to maintain the initial NaHCO 3 ‐P level. At a location with medium to high available‐P status (no P response expected), only 1.4 times the removed P was required for maintenance. The two locations required a fertilizer K rate of 0.75 and 0.22 times the K removed by alfalfa uptake to maintain their respective initial exchangeable‐K levels. The low maintenance requirement of the latter soil was apparently due to the K minerals present which buffered the exchangeable K near 100 mg·kg ⁻¹ .
Article
The influence of P, K, and S on symbiotic fixation of N2 in alfalfa nodules under field conditions is not well documented, even though through this mechanism shoot yield may be limited. The objective of this experiment was to study the effect of P, K, and S fertilization on alfalfa shoot yield, nodule numbers, and N2-fixation as estimated by acetylene reduction by taking core samples (80 mm diam) at two sampling times at two locations (a silt loam and a loamy sand soil). Potassium fertilization increased shoot weight per plant, nodule number per core, and N2-fixation rate at both locations more than the other nutrients studied. Shoot weight per plant increased 166% on the silt loam soil and 178% on the sandy soil with the addition of 448 kg K ha⁻¹. Phosphorus fertilization also increased shoot weight at both sites but less than did K fertilization. Addition of P and S increased nodule numbers on the sandy soil but not on the silt loam soil. Nitrogen-fixation rate was increased by 2.8 fold with the addition of 224 kg K ha⁻¹ on the sandy soil and 1.7 fold on the silt loam soil. Increased N2-fixation resulted from K fertilization only when P was added to the silt loam soil. Phosphorus addition increased nodule numbers and N2-fixation only on the sandy soil. The presence of a K ✕ S interaction for N2-fixation but not for shoot weight or nodule number per core indicates that some differences in fertility response exist between N2-fixation and other variables, even though all tend to be positively correlated. Sulfur fertilization had no effect on shoot weight but increased nodule numbers in alfalfa grown on sandy soil. Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left. Copyright © . .
Article
Plant nutrient applications and plant disease resistance are management factors that may contribute to successful alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) production on soils that are not inherently well suited to growing alfalfa. Applications of K and P, and cultivar resistance to Phytophthora root rot (Phytophtora megasperma f. sp. medicaginis; PRR) were evaluated on six well to poorly drained field soils to determine the contributions of these factors to alfalfa production under less than ideal conditions. The six soils were representative of two extensive soil associations in northwestern Pennsylvania. Factorial combinations of 0,175,350, and 525 kg ha−¹ yr−¹ K, and 45 and 90 kg ha−¹ yr−¹ P were applied annually for 3 yr. Significant yield response to only applied K was measured on two of the three soils of each association. Economic optimum rates for the 3 yr ranged from 137 to 263 kg ha−¹ yr−¹ K. Herbage K concentrations of 16.0 to 19.5 g kg−¹ and exchangeable soil K of 275 kg ha−¹ K were the minimum levels necessary to produce 90% of the maximum yield for the first harvest year. When the soil water table was within 50 or 25 cm of the soil surface at some time during the growing season, total yields for the 3-yr period were reduced by 20 to 259/0 or 80 to 85%, respectively. Due to the lack of PRR development, cultivar resistance to PRR did not influence the total alfalfa yields. Neither management factor of nutrient application nor cultivar resistance to PRR could compensate for the adverse effects of excess soil wetness on alfalfa. The extent of the area in each association in which excess soil water would adversely deet alfalfa production ranges from 10 to 75% Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left. Copyright © . .
Article
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the combined effect of irrigation, K fertilizer, and harvest management variables on the production of multi-disease-resistant, winterhardy alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars. A field experiment was conducted on a sandy, mixed Udic Haploboroll to determine the effects of three irrigation regimes, three harvest managements, and four annual K rates (0, 167, 334, and 501 kg ha−¹) on forage yield, forage quality, and persistence of‘Ramsey’ and ‘520’ alfalfa. No, full, and medium irrigation treatments were applied. Both full and medium irrigation regimes applied 3.5 cm of water when 50% of the extractable soil water had been depleted, but the medium irrigation was less frequent. Harvest managements consisted of: two harvests at full flower and one in late fall (HI), three harvests at one-tenth flower and one in late fall (H2), and three harvests at one-tenth flower (H3). Forage dry matter yield response to K increased with increasing irrigation, from 0.0033 Mg ha−1 kg−¹ K in nonirrigated to 0.0058 Mg ha−¹ kg−¹ K in fully irrigated alfalfa. Yield response to K was similar for harvest managements within no and medium irrigation regimes, but for the full irrigation regime, yield increased 0.0071 Mg ha−¹ kg−¹ K with harvest at one-tenth flower, and only 0.0031 Mg ha−¹ kg−¹ K with harvest at full flower. Following a severe winter after 2 yr of harvesting, the greatest stand and yield losses occurred with full irrigation and the most intensive (four-cut) harvest management. Mean final stands in the four-cut management were 19, 39, and 74% for full, medium, and nonirrigated alfalfas, respectively. Stand persistence and residual yield were increased by K fertilization under more frequent (one-tenth flower) harvest of irrigated alfalfa. Cultivars did not consistently differ in yield in two production years, but the less winterhardy 520 had greater final stands than Ramsey. Potassium fertilization is beneficial to yield and stand of alfalfa, although the response varies with irrigation and harvest management. Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left. Copyright © . .