It is impossible to read the literature on Britain’s overseas administrative services without encountering the qualifying term ‘elite’: an elite Service, a corps d’élite, an administrative elite.1 If the study of Britain’s Home Civil Service has, since the Trevelyan-Northcote Report of 1854, focused on access to merit through open competition, that on her overseas civil services has emphasized
... [Show full abstract] their elite properties. In all three overseas administrative Services under scrutiny here, it is the concept of careful admission through scrupulous choice into a select service which recurs, culminating in Philip Mason’s image of ‘picked men, picked from picked men’.2