ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

There is little agreement in teacher education as to what counts as knowledge and how individuals come to be affected by ideas, people, and events in their world. Whereas teacher education seems to debate questions about the adequacy of its structures, it has forgotten its place in the world and its obligations to world making. However, teacher education has not yet grappled with a theory of knowledge that can analyze social fractures, profound social violence, decisions of disregard, and how from such devastations, psychological significance can be made. Returning to an earlier history and drawing upon philosophers who were also concerned with the relation between teacher education and social reparation, this article advocates for a view of teacher education that can tolerate existential and ontological difficulties, psychical complexities, and learning from history.
Journal of TeacherEducation, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000Journal of TeacherEducation, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000
TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE
CONFUSION OF OUR TIMES
Deborah P. Britzman
York University
There is little agreement in teacher education as to what counts as knowledge and how individuals
come to be affected by ideas, people, and events in their world. Whereas teacher education seems to
debate questions about the adequacy of its structures, it has forgotten its place in the world and its
obligations to world making. However, teacher education has not yet grappled with a theory of
knowledge that can analyze social fractures, profound social violence, decisions of disregard, and
how from such devastations, psychological significance can be made. Returning to an earlier his
-
tory and drawing upon philosophers who were also concerned with the relation between teacher
education and social reparation, this article advocates for a view of teacher education that can toler
-
ate existential and ontological difficulties, psychical complexities, and learning from history.
If it is a truism that to teach, teachers must en-
gage knowledge, it is also right to observe that
as the new century unfolds, there is still little
agreement in our field of teacher education as to
which knowledge matters or even what might
be the matter with knowledge. Nor is there
much understanding regarding how those try-
ing to teach actually learn from their practices,
their students, or their incidental anxieties
made from acquiring experience. We cannot
agree on the length of the practicum, on
whether the 19th-century apprentice model is
still relevant, or even the future of schooling it
-
self. Various learning taxonomies developed
throughout this century try to settle these
doubts; yet, however elaborated or simplified,
the measures offered never seem adequate for
the uncertainties of teaching and learning. It is
difficult, then, to even find the subject of teacher
education, so inundated is our field with the ro
-
mance of cognitive styles, the rumblings of
brain research, the idealization of information
and standards, and the parade of new diagnoses
of learning failures: attention deficit disorders,
overstimulation, understimulation, and not
enough Mozart. At the beginning of this new
century, in the confusion of our times, we seem
to have a better idea of all that we lack than we
have a notion as to what makes understanding
so difficult (Britzman, 1998), or even how we
might think about the psychological signifi-
cance of teacher education.
We do know more about what holds educa-
tion and teacher education back. There is the
force of governmental interdictions, censoring
both ideas and the personal lives of teachers and
students. Our own definitions of professional
-
ism preclude complications of selves and then
ask for compliance and conformity. We have
made great strides in emptying the curriculum
from debating itself. Symptoms of these mala
-
dies can be observed: camera surveillance
devises, weapon detectors, and corporate ID
tags for students and teachers. Behind these
symptoms is the stultifying dream of uniting the
nation through a common curriculum made
safe from any controversy. And then we are
caught in a repetitive debate over whether
schools and teacher education can or should be
able to prevent eruptions of social violence. The
old question of what schooling is for becomes
utterly entangled with what it means to think
200
Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000 200-205
© 2000 by the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education
about school and teacher education as part and
parcel in the world. Somewhere between the
dream of education and the nightmare of its
daily grind, we lose and find teacher education.
Profound disagreement over prepara
-
tion—not just how to prepare teachers but how
schools prepare students—mirrors contempo
-
rary global themes. However, nowhere does
this question of what one should know and how
knowledge might matter take on more poign
-
ancy than when nations decide to confront and
work through their own buried pasts of human
devastations and genocide. Simply put, if we
can bear to learn from history, all that we know
about history requires reconstruction, not just of
texts and contexts, but also of intimate identity
and what might be included under the name
“potential.” From the South African Truth Com
-
mission, where victims and perpetrators face
each other, to the Israeli-Palestinian peace
accords that have set in motion revisions of edu-
cation; from the house arrest in London of Chil-
ean General Pinochet and the Chilean court’s
decision to bring to trial those previously
granted amnesty, to the recent art exhibit in
Colombia called “Art and Violence in Colombia
since 1948” that calls citizens to confront the
nation’s demise; from the spate of national
apologies, in the case of the United States for
enslaving Africans, in the case of the Pope, for
the history of anti-Semitism in Catholic liturgy,
to the problem of present responsibilities; and,
from renewed discussions on Germany’s reun
-
ion and the move of its capital city back to Ber
-
lin, to new and more devastating acknowledg
-
ments of the reach of the Holocaust in our own
times, the violence of the national repressed
returns what Caruth (1996) calls “unclaimed
experience.” These are all pedagogical projects,
not of management, but of thought. How is it
that so much of our past century remains
unclaimed in education? How can teacher edu
-
cation come to make itself relevant to such ethi
-
cal obligations? If teacher education could begin
to reclaim difficult knowledge, what would be
the work of teacher educators?
All of these events should remind us of our
present implication in world-making catastro
-
phes. Felman’s (1992) difficult question might
allow us to rethink the confusions of our times:
“In a post-traumatic century, a century that has
survived unthinkable historical catastrophes, is
there anything that we have learned or that we
should learn about education that we did not
know before?” (p. 1)
One might be tempted to dismiss Felman’s
(1992) question as just another burden, yet
another agenda. Our oldest educational com
-
plaint, after all, is that there is not enough time
to address existential, political, or even onto
-
logical breakdown. Yet, what is it that we do
with our time that we can do without these diffi
-
culties? If we take Felman seriously, it is crisis
that inaugurates the work of education, even as
education makes new forms of crisis. However,
when one looks at what counts as crisis in
teacher education, the world shrinks: Its geog
-
raphy is rather stingy, its disciplinary borrow
-
ings rather mere, its reliance upon social sci-
ences as the knowledge base shameful, its
eschewal of what is old fashionably called “the
mysteries of psychical life” or the strange and
unmastered ways that we are subject to uncon-
scious fantasies, sad. However, there is also the
question of how teacher education becomes
psychologically meaningful, allowing partici-
pants to explore a certain freedom, a certain pas-
sion. A tiny sense of teacher education speaks
volumes of our woeful disregard of the fragility
of learning and of knowledge in our present;
lost is the capacity to expand the reach and rele
-
vancy in our field, our thinking of how teacher
education can come to matter to those involved.
Undoubtedly, these are all big issues. The lit
-
tle issues matter as well and are made from
daily encounters of selves facing one another in
a classroom and the ways that all of us are as
susceptible to our perceptions as we are to what
we ignore and to that which we cannot bear to
know. Indeed, the intimate problem of how one
becomes affected by knowledge, by the experi
-
ences of strangers, and by histories that are not
our own, not in terms of its application for oth
-
ers but in terms of our own capacities to believe
and be touched by knowledge, remains one of
the grand paradoxes of our century. Usually,
our disillusion with the promise of knowledge
and progress is raised from the ruins of tremen
-
Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000 201
dous social breakdown and from the difficulties
of understanding what went so terribly wrong.
The philosopher Theodor Adorno, for example,
wondered what education could be after
Auschwitz. He came to this difficult question
because of his work in teacher education: When
World War II ended, Adorno, who was in exile
in the United States, returned to Germany. His
chief means of employment upon return was in
a teachers’ college where he was assigned the
charge of examining secondary teachers on the
topic of philosophy (Hohendahl, 1995). Adorno
(1998) noticed that whereas the candidates
could give adequate answers, they also admit
-
ted that philosophy meant nothing to them.
They passed the exam by offering clichéd ac
-
counts and platitudes.
This test therefore should permit us to see whether
those candidates, who as teachers in secondary
schools are burdened with a heavy responsibility for
the spiritual and material development of Germany,
are intellectuals, or, as Ibsen said more than eighty
years ago, merely specialized technicians. (Adorno,
1998, p. 21)
Critical pedagogy in North America would also
raise such concerns about whether teacher edu-
cation might exceed the normative cloak of pro-
fessionalism and instead, inspire itself to be
unafraid to ask new kinds of questions and to
receive questions about the preconceptions of
our field.
Hannah Arendt (1954/1993) also centered
the theme of crisis in education. Just as Felman
(1992) insisted that education is crisis, writing
before her, Arendt elaborated the stakes:
Which aspects of the modern world and its crisis
have actually revealed themselves in the educa
-
tional crisis....What can we learn from this crisis for
the essence of education—not in the sense that one
can always learn from mistakes what ought not to be
done, but rather by reflecting on the role that educa
-
tion plays in every civilization, that is on the obliga
-
tion that the existence of children entails for every
human society. (pp. 184-185)
Arendt asked educators to assume a certain dig
-
nity within vulnerability, that children were be
-
coming adults but that they were already, like
adults, humans. Arendt did not mean that we
are all the same, or that there is an original inno
-
cence that adults must preserve. Instead, she
wanted us to consider something difficult: the
meeting of adults and children as an ethical obli
-
gation yet to be accomplished.
We can raise a similar question for teacher
education: What are our obligations, not in the
sense of getting work done, but in the way we
can even image our work and how our work
-
ings affect our capacity to think beyond what we
do. What inhibits our capacity to respond ethi
-
cally to others, to learn something from people
we will never meet and to be affected by histo
-
ries that we may never live? Can teacher educa
-
tion create conditions for all of us to risk the self
in an encounter with histories of bad faith? If we
can take seriously the thinking of people like
Arendt, Adorno, and Felman, we might wonder
why education has such difficulty with encoun
-
tering its own breakdowns, blind spots, and
vulnerabilities. We have yet to grapple with
what knowledge does to teachers, particularly,
the difficult knowledge of social catastrophe,
evidence of woeful disregard, experiences of
social violence, illness, and death, and most
generally, with what it means to come to terms
with various kinds of trauma, both individual
and collective. What makes trauma traumatic is
the incapacity to respond adequately, accompa-
nied by feelings of profound helplessness and
loss, and a sense that no other person or group
will intervene. What makes trauma traumatic is
the loss of self and other.
World making requires self-knowledge of
what the world might symbolize or represent
for the self. It is both our earliest and oldest tech
-
nology. This first obligation to “know thyself”
brings to the fore the little matters of teacher
education, not just because it might take us
away from the romance of technology, the rub
-
ble of the information highway, and the illu
-
sions made from the testing industry, although
this would be enough. The work of knowing the
self entails acknowledging not just what one
would like to know about the self but also what
is difficult to know about the self, including fea
-
tures we tend to project to others: aggression,
self aggrandizement, destructive wishes, and
helplessness. These are the devastating qualities
of psychical life. And yet, there is also some
-
202 Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000
thing about education that resists self-
knowledge.
What happens to the self who teaches? Gard
-
ner (1997) offers one of the more honest formu
-
lations: All we can do is try to teach, but this
effort often gets caught in the tangles of what he
calls, “the true teacher’s defining affliction:
furor to teach” (p. 3). By this, he means forget
-
ting the students or teaching in spite of them,
maybe even to spite them. He also means that
whereas we must believe in the knowledge we
offer students, there is a centripetal tendency to
freeze knowledge by undervaluing the question
and forgetting the importance of doubting the
very knowledge on offer. The furor to teach
defends against this capacity to doubt and the
interest in using knowledge as a means for
world making and self-making.
This is not the first time the manic defensive
qualities of teaching were noticed. At the begin-
ning of this century, when William James lec-
tured to Harvard’s future teachers in 1899, he
dedicated many lectures to the aggressive quali-
ties of what can only be called the “full-speed-
ahead” school of teaching. Warning teachers
against their habituated thinking, their auto-
matic associations, their unconscious wishes,
and what he called “a certain blindness in hu-
man beings,” James (1899/1983) asked his audi-
ence to ponder their own obstacles to thought
and how these obstacles structured their actions
of teaching and learning in his last lecture,
“What Makes Life Significant.”
In my previous talk, “On a Certain Blindness,” I tried
to make you feel how soaked and shot-through life is
with values and meanings which we fail to realize
because of our external and insensible point of view.
The meanings are there for the others, but they are
not there for us. There lies more than a mere interest
of curious speculation in understanding this. I wish
that I could convince you of it as I feel it myself. It is
the basis of all our tolerance, social, religious, and
political. The forgetting of it lies at the root of every
stupid and sanguinary mistake that rulers over
subject-people make. (p. 150)
Anna Freud’s (1930/1974) four lectures to
teachers on psychoanalysis would also offer
comparable warnings, noting a certain blind
-
ness toward and defense against exploring the
vulnerabilities of interior life. Her first lecture
begins with an observation that still holds in our
own time: “We are all aware that teachers are
still very suspicious and doubtful of psycho
-
analysis” (p. 73). Nonetheless, over the course
of her four lectures, she tries to offer very par
-
ticular frames for interpreting not so much the
dream of education, but what the dream de
-
fends against: rescue fantasies, altruistic surren
-
der, hostility toward the student, the eschewal
of the reach of sexuality, and the difficulties of
remembering one’s own childhood researches.
Her last lecture also suggests why teachers may
be suspicious of psychoanalysis: “Probably you
seek practical advice rather than extension of
theoretical knowledge....Above all, you want
to know whether we, as adults, should interfere
more or be less authoritarian than adults have
been in the past. The answer to the last question
I have to say that psychoanalysis so far has
stood for limiting the efforts of education by
emphasizing some specific dangers connected
with it” (p. 123). But she left it to the audience to
decide not only which dangers mattered, but
also what might be the matter with their own
teacher education.
James (1899/1983) and Freud (1930/1974)
both noticed a difficulty in learning from ideas
that rattle not just the learner but also the very
foundations of education. Analyst Phillips
(1998) offers an even more radical principle for
what we might encounter as education: What
would education be like if our attention was
given over to
the irregular, to the oddity, the unpredictability of
what each person makes of what he is given—the
singularity born of each person’s distinctive history.
The sense in which a passionate life is a good life be
-
cause its goodness is always in question. (pp. 40-41)
What allows for the possibility of distinct histo
-
ries is the effort in questioning one’s own narra
-
tives. How then are questions made? According
to Winnicott (1996), questions are made from
our doubts and our defenses against doubt. To
illustrate this, he analyzes the stakes of the com
-
mon question, “Yes, but is it true?”
Winnicott (1996) was struggling with how
students began to learn from their study of psy
-
Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000 203
chology. He noted two stages in trying to learn
from the mysteries of psychical life, from how
one feels torn by new and old knowledge. At
first, students tended to see the knowledge of
psychology strictly in terms of how they can
apply it to others, a form of compliance with the
knowledge and with the tacit cultural value that
knowledge must be useable. This may be what
Gardner (1997) had in mind with his notion of
the furor to teach. The second stage of learning
is destructive, in the sense that all learning must
be destructive; along with trying to make psy
-
chology one’s own, the student will criticize,
raise questions, doubt it, and if the knowledge
can survive this attack, it can be turned toward
the self. This is where Phillips (1998) places our
capacity to question the goodness of our narra
-
tives and where Adorno (1998) situates a heavy
responsibility. Both Winnicott and Phillips offer
the idea that self-knowledge comes after the self
experiences. Self-knowledge is not a feature of
the experience but a residue of the self’s desire
to keep the experience as her or his own, to feel
again one’s affective ties, to remind the self that
ideas one knew before can matter.
What if teacher education began with such a
simple model of learning? Could there be a
movement from self-knowledge to world mak-
ing? We would have to think about how the
teaching techniques we offer induce compli-
ance in the form of our students quickly taking
techniques to their classrooms. This rush to
application and to what mistakenly is called
“the practical” would, of course, be compliance
to the dominant rule that knowledge use is
strictly defined by its capacity to be externalized
and applied to others. It will take time to notice
the qualities of ideas at stake, not from the van
-
tage of the triumph of application but from the
difficulties of describing what James
(1899/1983) named as “habituated knowledge”
and what Arendt (1954/1993) referred to as
“ethical obligations.” To implicate oneself in
one’s own narratives of learning and teaching
means turning habituated knowledge back on
itself, and examining its most unflattering—for
many, its most devastating—features. It also
means exploring how even this most unflatter
-
ing moment may offer insight into making
significance.
There is nothing easy about encountering his
-
tories of woeful disregard. At the end of our cen
-
tury, teacher education has yet to even acknowl
-
edge the confusion of our times. Learning from
the other’s trauma is of a different order, one
where application of knowledge is irrelevant
because knowledge of trauma is other than the
knowledge of mastery, application, and stan
-
dardization. This does not mean that traumatic
knowledge cannot be worked through. How
-
ever, it does mean that many of the arguments in
our field are irrelevant to new ways of conceptu
-
alizing our worldly obligations. If teacher edu
-
cation is to join the world, be affected by its par
-
ticipation in world making, and question the
“goodness” of its own passions, we must
rethink not only past practices and what goes on
under the name of professionalism, but also the
very imagination it will take to exceed compli-
ance, fear of controversy, and “unclaimed expe-
riences.” Then, we might ask a new question:
How does teacher education come to notice that
the world matters?
REFERENCES
Adorno, T. (1998). Critical models: Interventions and catch-
words (H. Pickford, Trans.). New York: Columbia Uni
-
versity Press.
Arendt, H. (1993). Between past and future: Eight exercises in
political thought. New York: Penguin. (Original work
published in 1954)
Britzman, D. P. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: Toward
a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. Albany: State Univer
-
sity of New York Press.
Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative,
and history. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
Felman, S. (1992). Education and crisis, or the vicissitudes
of teaching. In S. Felman & D. Laub (Eds.), Testimony:
Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and his
-
tory (pp. 1-56). New York: Routledge.
Freud, A. (1974). Four lectures on psychoanalysis for teach
-
ers and parents. In The writings of Anna Freud, Volume I
1922-1935 (pp. 73-90). New York: International Univer
-
sities Press. (Original work published in 1930)
James, W. (1983). Talks to teachers on psychology and to stu
-
dents on some of life’s ideals (F. Bowers, Ed.). Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work pub
-
lished in 1899)
204 Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000
Gardner, M. R. (1997). On trying to teach: The mind in corre
-
spondence. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Hohendahl, P. (1995). Prismatic thought: Theodor W. Adorno.
Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Phillips, A. (1998). The beast in the nursery: On curiosity and
other appetites. New York: Pantheon.
Winnicott, D. W. (1996). Yes, but is it true? In R. Shepherd, J.
Johns, & H. Robinson (Eds.), Thinking about children (pp.
13-18). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Deborah P. Britzman is a professor of education,
social and political thought, and women’s studies at York
University in Toronto. Her interest is in the psychoana
-
lytic study of teaching and learning.
Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 51, No. 3, May/June 2000 205
... Así, la labor del profesorado es crear instancias para que el estudiantado pueda deconstruir las estructuras y las finalidades presentes en las narraciones, lo que puede provocar distintas reacciones emocionales vinculadas a las identidades culturales de los sujetos. Por otra parte, considerando el psicoanálisis y el concepto de conocimientos difíciles (Britzman, 1998;2000a;2000b), se plantea una aproximación educativa al trauma, a los testimonios y a la idea de retorno difícil (Golberg, 2017). En esta línea, los aprendizajes se desarrollan a partir del encuentro entre los individuos y los testimonios de las personas que vivieron el evento o en el contexto traumático. ...
... Por ello, en sus respuestas se referían a la forma de hablar de las personas, a sus miradas, tono de voz, emociones, sentimientos, sensaciones, personalidades, ideas y a las distintas dimensiones que la violencia transformaba el diario vivir. Esto último se encuentra en línea con la propuesta de Britzman (1998;2000a;2000b) y Simon (2004, los que plantean que es importante que los sujetos del presente puedan encontrarse con los otros del pasado, escuchen sus consejos y sean removidos e interpelados por ellos. Así, considerando los resultados de la investigación, para lograr lo anterior es necesario que el estudiantado pueda humanizar a los sujetos históricos, se acerque a su cotidianeidad y, por un instante, suspendan su pretensión de comprender y reconstruir el contexto a partir del trabajo con fuentes históricas. ...
... Es decir, los jóvenes experimentan afectaciones cuando observan, escuchan o leen cómo era vivir durante la dictadura, a lo que se suma su interés por las miradas, los gestos, el tono de voz, la forma de hablar, en las emociones y los sentimientos de las personas del pasado. En consecuencia, las tres dimensiones involucradas en la afectación que experimentan los jóvenes permite aunar en un solo proceso la aproximación sociocultural crítica (Epstein y Peck, 2018) y la psicoanalítica a las historias difíciles (Britzman, 1998;2000a;2000b), ya que la afectación se produce porque los relatos históricos que los sujetos portan son interpelados, remecidos o conflictuados por las vivencias traumáticas del pasado, expuestas en los documentos de memoria y derechos humanos. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objetivo: caracterizar las dimensiones que estructuran las afectaciones que experimenta el estudiantado al trabajar con documentos de memoria y derechos humanos de la dictadura chilena. Método: la investigación fue implementada en jóvenes de secundaria de un colegio particular pagado de Santiago de Chile. A partir de la teoría fundamentada se analizó un corpus de datos de 152 respuestas, mediante codificación abierta, axial y agrupaciones categoriales. Resultados: el alumnado experimentó una diversidad de afectaciones al encontrarse con diferentes documentos de memoria y derechos humanos. Así, los participantes manifestaron múltiples sentimientos y emociones, tales como la rabia, la pena, el mie-do, la tranquilidad, la alegría o el orgullo, las que fueron provocadas por los sujetos históricos, la violencia, los espacios/ lugares, los acontecimientos, la información o las ideas que estaban representadas en los documentos. Discusión y conclusiones: las afectaciones que experimentó el grupo estudiantil se estructuran a partir de tres dimensiones: las narraciones sobre la dictadura que los jóvenes desarrollaron a partir de sus experiencias históricas nacionales, comunitarias o familiares; la humanización de los sujetos históricos al observar, escuchar o leer los documentos; la construcción de un contexto didáctico que reconoció, visibilizó, y trabajó con las afectaciones.
... The seminal book Testimony (Felman & Laub, 1992), which Laub co-authored with literature scholar Felman, delineates the main principles of the approach, emphasizing the interviewers' weighty responsibility of assisting survivors in navigating their traumatic memories. Felman's pedagogic suggestion constitutes a main element of the educational theory that influenced an education scholar Deborah Britzman (2000), who employs the term 'difficult knowledge' to describe the challenges of teaching about murderous historical phenomena, such as the Holocaust, genocide, and violent political and social attitudes. Britzman's followers examine documentary testimony as a central teaching tool, utilizing it to expose students to issues of difficult knowledge (e.g., Stoddard et al., 2017). ...
Article
This study examines the production of film testimonies as part of an academic course and how this structured educational process develops transformative competencies in learners. The semester-long course involves students from a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, drawn from all segments of the Israeli and Palestinian communities. Students study and experience the theoretical, pedagogical, ethical, artistic, and practical approaches of a psychiatrist and testimonial documentarist Laub and his writing partner Felman (Felman & Laub, 1992). They are also introduced to central authors in the history of documentary film. The process culminates in the students’ documentation of stories within their own families and communities and the creation of their cinematic testimonies, which they present and discuss in class. The study aims to explore how the learning process helps students acquire transformative competencies as defined in the OECD 2030 document on meaningful learning needed today. Quantitative and qualitative content analyses tools were used to analyze the products of two testimonial courses, 19 film testimonials, and 32 reflective texts written by the students about the process they had undergone. The content analysis reveals that the students acquired three key skills: (1) taking responsibility, (2) balancing tensions and dilemmas, and (3) creating new theoretical and poetic values. The results also confirm the hypothesis that the pedagogical process of producing cinematic testimonies about social and historical crises can serve as a source of inspiration and growth by promoting empathetic listening and meaningful social change.
... Conocimiento difícil es "un concepto destinado a significar tanto las representaciones de los traumas sociales en el currículo como los encuentros del individuo con ellos en la pedagogía" (Pitt y Britzman, 2003, p. 755). Britzman (2000) argumenta la importancia de incluirlos en la formación docente. Sostiene que en esta no hay acuerdo con respecto a lo que se considera conocimiento y cómo los individuos llegan a verse afectados por las ideas, las personas y los acontecimientos de su mundo. ...
Article
Full-text available
El presente ensayo plantea y defiende la tesis de que algunos de los desarrollos contemporáneos en el enfoque histórico-cultural son de gran pertinencia a la educación y las prácticas pedagógicas, en particular las elaboraciones de la relación aprendizaje-desarrollo según conceptualizada por Vygotski. Con fundamentación en estudios realizados por la autora, su objetivo es brindar información sobre los antecedentes de estos desarrollos, discutirlos y analizarlos, y compartir reflexiones con respecto a sus implicaciones. El abordaje al tema se realiza mediante una revisión crítica de literatura académica contemporánea que elabora algunas ideas y produce investigaciones inspiradas en el legado L.S. Vygotski. Consistente con el enfoque histórico-cultural, el examen de las producciones teóricas e investigativas contemporáneas comienza por establecer sus antecedentes y contextualizarlas. Del análisis resulta una perspectiva compleja en la que conceptos relegados en lecturas e interpretaciones de la obra de Vygotsky pasan a ocupar un lugar central. Se concluye que desde ese lugar se han generado y siguen generando propuestas para transformar la educación tradicional en una práctica orientada a la equidad y la justicia social.
... This separation has helped to manifest a concept of 'good education' that does not support educators to believe that it is within their remit to respond affectively, emotionally or politically to place, or to knowledge, or to support learners to do so. As Britzman (2000) noted over 20 years ago, this separation ultimately co-constitutes a void of responsibility for education institutions with regard to the most pressing and concerning issues of our time. ...
... The richness of First Nations knowledge can be represented through story, song and cultural artefacts (Desmarchelier 2020). However, when addressing knowledge, the recognition of 'difficult knowledge' is imperative (Britzman 2000). Australia's 'difficult knowledge' involves historical violence, racism and oppression, that continues to impact First Nation people today. ...
... ¿Cómo abordar las historias difíciles para fortalecer la democracia?: Un modelo didáctico estudiantado cuando se encuentra, a través de los testimonios, con los sujetos que vivieron la experiencia traumática (Britzman, 1998). En consecuencia, se busca aprender de las emociones, preguntas, inquietudes, resistencias y conflictos que podrían producirse en los aprendices cuando son afectados por lo traumático (Britzman, 2000a;2000b). ...
Article
Full-text available
Resumen Considerando los escasos lineamientos para que el profesorado trabaje con pasados difíciles, el objetivo del artículo es presentar un modelo didáctico, probado en aula y discutido con docentes, para abordar la dictadura chilena desde una perspectiva ético-ciudadana. Este último se estructura a partir de los conceptos de historias difíciles, afectación, documentos de memoria y derechos humanos y dimensión ética del pensamiento histórico. Con el fin de describir su aplicación, se plantean sus aspectos centrales y se describen las actividades de los cuatro momentos de la propuesta. A partir de esto último, el modelo posibilita: el trabajo sistemático con las memorias de las personas significativas del estudiantado y con los relatos históricos de los jóvenes, además de acoger las afectaciones y promover el análisis de fuentes para reconstruir el pasado. Con ello, se promueven reflexiones sobre las responsabilidades ciudadanas con la democracia y los derechos humanos en el presente y futuro. Palabras claves: modelo educativo, historias difíciles, documentos de memoria y derechos humanos, emociones, educación ciudadana.
... Este último surge desde el psicoanálisis y se aproxima al trauma, a los testimonios y a la idea terapéutica de retorno difícil desde una perspectiva educativa (Goldberg, 2017). Según Britzman (1998Britzman ( , 2000aBritzman ( , 2000b, los conocimientos difíciles se enfocan en los aprendizajes que pueden ser desarrollados a partir del encuentro entre el alumno y los sujetos históricos que vivieron el evento, el contexto o la experiencia traumática. Con ello, se busca que el estudiantado aprenda de las emociones, preguntas, inquietudes, dilemas y conflictos que emergen en ellos al verse afectados por lo traumático. ...
Article
Full-text available
El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar las preguntas que emergen en el estudiantado al ser afectado por documentos de memoria y derechos humanos creados durante la dictadura chilena. Esta es una investigación cualitativa de carácter exploratorio, la que utiliza la teoría fundamentada para analizar 152 respuestas que desarrollaron estudiantes de dos cursos de educación media en un colegio particular pagado de Santiago de Chile. Los resultados evidencian que la experiencia afectiva que vivieron los alumnos posibilitó la formulación de preguntas diversas, complejas, significativas para los jóvenes y desafiantes para el currículum, el contexto escolar y el profesorado, ya que exigen humanizar el pasado, abordar grupos invisibilizados (víctimas, perpetradores y personas comunes y corrientes), desarrollar juicios éticos sobre las decisiones, acciones o inacciones de los sujetos históricos y reflexionar históricamente en torno a los consejos y las exigencias que las personas del pasado imponen al presente.
... Es decir, siguiendo a Britzman (1998;2000a;2000b), los conocimientos difíciles se centran en los aprendizajes que pueden emerger a partir del encuentro entre el estudiante y los sujetos históricos que vivieron la experiencia traumática. Con ello, se busca que el alumnado aprenda de las emociones, preguntas, inquietudes, dilemas y conflictos que surgen en ellos al verse afectados por lo traumático. ...
Article
Full-text available
El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar las motivaciones y la relevancia que le atribuye el alumnado a las acciones de resistencia individuales y colectivas que desarrollaron los ciudadanos durante la dictadura chilena. Esta es una investigación cualitativa de carácter exploratorio que analiza 70 respuestas que desarrollaron 35 estudiantes de educación media en un colegio particular pagado de Santiago de Chile. Los resultados demuestran que los participantes creen que los sujetos históricos se organizaron en contra de la dictadura por motivaciones generales y ahistóricas (defensa de los derechos humanos, pérdida del miedo y deseos de cambios), además valoran y señalan que las acciones ciudadanas colectivas fueron las principales causantes de la caída de la dictadura comandada por Pinochet. Esto último demuestra la necesidad de complejizar y trabajar de forma explícita y sistemática las historias difíciles desde la dimensión ética del pensamiento histórico.
Article
In this book I explore the ways in which texts of a certain period—the texts of psychoanalysis, of literature, and of literary theory—both speak about and speak through the profound story of traumatic experience. The chapters . . . explore the complex ways that knowing and not knowing are entangled in the language of trauma and in the stories associated with it. Each one of these texts engages, in its own specific way, a central problem of listening, of knowing, and of representing that emerges from the actual experience of the crisis. My main endeavor is . . . to trace in each of these texts a different story, the story or the textual itinerary of insistently recurring words or figures. The key figures my analysis uncovers and highlights—the figures of "departure," "falling," "burning," or "awakening"— in their insistence, here engender stories that in fact emerge out of the rhetorical potential and the literary resonance of these figures, a literary dimension that cannot be reduced to the thematic content of the text or to what the theory encodes, and that, beyond what we know or theorize about it, stubbornly persists in bearing witness to some forgotten wound. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Talks To Teachers On Psychology ; and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals / William James Note: The University of Adelaide Library eBooks @ Adelaide.