ArticlePDF Available

Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man



In this article we argue that the complex connections between gender and fatness have not been fully examined, particularly in so far as they relate to men. We consider the role of early feminist literature in establishing the idea that the fear of fatness is fundamentally tied up with patriarchy and the ways this also underwrites more recent examinations of fatness and gender. Moreover, we assert that popular feminist scholarship has actively produced the assumption that weight is not only a women's issue, but that it is tied up with the very construction of femininity. Through an examination of the cultural history of fatness we show that men have also been caught up in the drive to reshape the body over the last century. However, their concerns have remained largely hidden, framed as they often are in the lexicon of ‘fitness’ and ‘muscularity’. An examination of the limited published material on male concerns with fat reveals that for many men fatness is feminizing – and undermines normative forms of masculinity in threatening ways. We call for further research that considers both female and male experiences of fatness, given the limitations of approaches that focus merely on one or the other.
Body & Society
The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/1357034X07074780
2007 13: 107Body & Society
Kirsten Bell and Darlene McNaughton
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
Published by:
On behalf of:
The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University
can be found at:Body & SocietyAdditional services and information for Alerts:
What is This?
- Feb 27, 2007Version of Record >>
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
During the 2003 series of the popular television singing competition Australian
Idol a rather controversial incident occurred when one of the show’s three judges,
Ian ‘Dicko’ Dickinson, commented that the dress worn by one of the female
contestants, Paulini, did not flatter her size and that she would have been better
off ‘shedding a couple of pounds’ before attempting to wear it. Given the insen-
sitive nature of these comments, it is unsurprising that talk back radio and
current affairs programs went into a frenzy over this incident the following day
(Leone, 2003). For its part, the audience demonstrated its support by giving
Paulini her highest ratings yet and Dicko was publicly castigated on the popular
television show The Panel, where he admitted that even his wife had refused to
talk to him following ‘The Paulini Incident’.
We believe the widespread public censure Dicko received following his
comments reflects the extent to which popular feminist interpretations that link
gender, patriarchy, body image and weight have been taken up. There was clearly
a widespread recognition that such public dissections of the female body were
inappropriate and harmful to the self-esteem of female contestants. However, it
is interesting to contemplate the general lack of response to the same judge’s
comments regarding the body size of Courtney, a male contestant in the 2004
series of Australian Idol, who was grilled about his weight on national television
Body & Society
2007 SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore),
Vol. 13(1): 107–131
DOI: 10.1177/1357034X07074780
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 107
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
the following year and asked in extremely blunt terms what he planned to do
about it.
Aside from a few desultory (and little publicized) statements by nutri-
tionists pointing out that this sort of public interrogation was hardly helpful, the
talk back radio shows and current affairs programs remained notably silent
regarding Dicko’s attack.
The 2005 series of Australian Idol continued its tradition of publicly criticiz-
ing the weight of its contestants (this time the offender was judge Kyle Sandi-
lands, who commented on the ‘tuck shop lady arms’ of female contestant Kate),
and once again the media response was swift, with Youth Affairs Minister Jacinta
Allan stating that the comments sent a dangerous message to young viewers
(Advertiser, 2005). The question we are interested in exploring in this article is:
why was public outrage following the inappropriate comments by the Australian
Idol judges so much greater for the female contestants than for the male contes-
tant, who was subjected to an even more direct and personal interrogation, and
how does this connect with cultural understandings of gender and fatness?
In this article we argue that the complex ways in which gender and fatness
are intertwined, understood and experienced have not been fully examined in
the extant literature, particularly in so far as they relate to men.
We consider
the role of early feminist literature in establishing the idea that the fear of fatness
is fundamentally tied up with patriarchy and femininity and the ways this
assumption continues to underwrite more recent examinations of fatness and
gender. Through an exploration of the cultural history of fatness since the 19th
century, we discuss the ways in which men have also been caught up in the drive
to reshape the body during this period, despite their invisibility in the literature.
We critique the notion that men are immune to body concerns and explore the
ways in which fatness, muscularity and masculinity are intertwined. The key
point we want to establish is that men have long encountered ‘the devil in their
flesh’ (cf. Chernin, 1981) and that reviling fatness is not a peculiarly feminine
Feminist Scholarship on Body Image and Weight Issues
The earliest and most influential attempts to theorize body weight issues can be
seen in feminist scholarship starting in the late 1970s and continuing until the
mid-1990s. Although coming from different subject positions and writing with
varying degrees of sophistication, writers such as Susie Orbach (1978, 1986);
Marcia Millman (1980); Kim Chernin (1981, 1986); Marilyn Lawrence (1984);
Carole Spitzack (1990); Naomi Wolf (1990); Morag MacSween (1993); and Susan
Bordo (1993) have all argued that the loathing of fatness is deeply gendered.
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 108
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Fatness itself is not the problem, they write it is female fat that is pathologized.
Therefore, in the words of Susie Orbach, ‘fat is a feminist issue’. The ‘tyranny of
slenderness’ (Chernin, 1981) exacts a heavy toll on women and eating disorders
such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia are reframed not as individual pathologies
but rather as crystallizations of the dysfunctional and contradictory messages
that all women are exposed to (see Orbach, 1986; Bordo, 1993: chapter 4).
It is well documented and widely accepted that the scrutiny placed on female
overweight is greater than the scrutiny placed on male overweight. Our obsessive
monitoring of the weight levels of female celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey and
Kirstie Alley is not matched by a similar inspection of male stars. This scrutiny
does not only take place at the level of popular culture; it is well documented that
health practitioners are similarly fixated on female fat (Schwartz, 1986; Bordo,
1993; Sobal and Maurer, 1999a; Campos, 2004). For example, a study by Ferraro
and Holland (2002) shows that women are much more likely to be evaluated as
obese by their doctors than male patients – even if the women do not actually
have a Body Mass Index over 30. Similarly, in their study of obesity and stigma,
Joanisse and Synnott (1999) note that the women they interviewed were more
likely to recount stories of abuse and bullying by medical professionals than men.
These women were often lectured about weight loss, even when their medical
complaints were clearly unrelated to their weight: such as bladder infections,
nosebleeds and broken arms. Interviewees also recounted instances of callous
jokes and comments doctors made about their weight:
One woman was asked by her gynaecologist how many chairs she’d broken in his waiting
room that day. Another woman’s complaint that her medication made her nauseous was
greeted with indifference by her doctor, who remarked that at least that way she’d lose weight.
Gina and Mary Lou were warned by their doctors (both male) that fat was not attractive to
men. (Joanisse and Synnott, 1999: 57)
Feminist scholars and writers were amongst the first to challenge the medical
models of obesity and their work has been invaluable in demonstrating the
ongoing collusion between biomedical and cultural constructions of weight. As
Gard and Wright (2005: 153–4) note, ‘it is generally agreed that second wave
feminism has led the way . . . in challenging notions of the body that simply take
it to be a biological object to be studied in the context of the medical and biologi-
cal sciences’. Moreover, such works paved the way for more recent analyses
written from feminist and queer positions, which have directly focused on social
constructions of fatness (Gard and Wright, 2005: 160), such as Richard Klein’s
(1996) Eat Fat; Jeffrey Sobal and Donna Maurer’s edited collections Weighty
Issues (1999a) and Interpreting Weight (1999b); Mimi Nichter’s (2000) Fat Talk;
Elspeth Probyn’s (2000) Carnal Appetites; Jana Evans Braziel and Kathleen
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 109
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
LeBesco’s (2001) edited collection Bodies out of Bounds; Kandi Stinson’s (2001)
Women and Dieting Culture; Kathleen LeBesco’s (2004) Revolting Bodies; and
Don Kulick and Anne Meneley’s (2005) edited collection, Fat: The Anthropology
of an Obsession.
However, while the early feminist scholarship has been invaluable in opening
up discussion of the ways in which the female body has been constructed, and
the rigid requirements to which female bodies have been expected to conform,
many of these early works share an underlying assumption, namely, that the fear
of fatness is something only women experience. In this literature patriarchy is
posited as the central cause for women’s fat oppression, and the tyranny of beauty
ideals that focus on slimness and youthfulness. Kathleen Rowe (1990: 413) seems
to sum up the general tenor of the arguments in her statement that, ‘Fatness, of
course, is an especially significant issue for women, and perhaps patriarchy
nowhere inscribes itself more insidiously and viciously on female bodies than in
the cult of thinness.’
It is clear that these writers are interested in exploring the specifically female
experience of fatness, which does not preclude the recognition that fat may be a
men’s issue as well. Indeed, in the preface of her extremely influential book, Fat
is a Feminist Issue, Susie Orbach mentions that a concern with thinness affects
men as well as women (1978: xvii–xviii), although she indicates that she has not
attempted to formulate ‘a theory that describes how sexism affects men’s body
size’ (1978: xviii). However, Orbach’s effort to theorize female concerns with
weight has the potential to undermine any recognition of male body issues. For
example, when she (1978: 22) argues that ‘fat is an adaptation to the oppression
of women’, male fat is difficult to conceptualize as anything other than an indi-
vidual choice or pathology lacking in broader symbolic meaning or political
A tendency to actively dismiss male concerns with fatness becomes more
prominent in the work of Kim Chernin (1981) – who was strongly influenced by
Orbach’s writings. While Chernin acknowledges that there are men who wish to
lose weight, from her description it appears that ‘men’ positively revel in their
fatness. It is worth quoting at length from Chernin to give some sense of her
perspective on the male relationship with fat. She writes,
By now it must be evident that the fat man has been spared this burden of negative symbolic
meaning [attached to fatness] only because the fat woman has taken it on. One of the great
advantages to men, in a culture they dominate, is the ability to assign to those they oppress
whatever it is they wish to disown or ignore in their own condition. It is because the fat man
believes the imagery his own culture has created that he can gorge himself with impunity and
strut about the pool with his bulging belly, while the fat women are all wearing blouses in the
water. Because his wife has agreed to carry the general shame our entire culture feels about the
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 110
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
body, he can proudly walk up to the younger women who are absorbed in one another’s
company; and now he insists upon opening conversation with them, his belly neatly held
between his proud hands, as if it too were an estimable possession. (Chernin, 1981: 124)
Other writers do acknowledge more explicitly that men are affected by unre-
alistic body ideals, although they invariably suggest that male body concerns are
of recent vintage and not particularly intense (Millman, 1980; Cash et al., 1986;
Wolf, 1990; Faludi, 1991; Bordo, 1993, 1999; Cash and Roy, 1999). For example,
Marcia Millman (1980: Appendix III: 233, 237) argues that ‘. . . being fat or
worrying about weight is a more consequential and meaning-laden issue for
women than for men’. On the basis of interviews with five men who became over-
weight in middle age,
she concludes that fat men are relatively unselfconscious
about their weight and accord it little importance in their daily lives.
We believe that this focus on fat prejudice as a manifestation of patriarchy has
served to disguise more complex dimensions of the ways that fatness has been
constructed. As Brownell and Wasserstrom (2002: 6) note, patriarchy is often
‘. . . invoked as a catchall word for all systems based on wide-spread inequalities
between the sexes’. They point out that the more extreme versions of this
. . . can fail to take into account cultural and historical differences in relationships between the
sexes. They can fail to question the experiences of males, leaving men as universal subjects even
as they try to question the negative stereotypes attached to women as the polar opposition of
men . . . And they can make patriarchy seem static, as opposed to something continually
undergoing change and being re-created in new ways. (Brownell and Wasserstrom, 2002: 6;
emphasis added)
We would suggest that all of the major feminist approaches to weight issues
(e.g. Orbach, 1978, 1986; Millman, 1980; Chernin, 1981, 1986; Lawrence, 1984;
Spitzack, 1990; Wolf, 1990; MacSween, 1993; and Bordo, 1993) have similarly
failed to question the experiences of males, largely as a result of their commitment
to the notion of patriarchy as an overarching framework for their material. Thus,
despite the different theoretical orientations of these writers, and the varying levels
of sophistication with which they explore the female body, there is a common
thread running through each. In their commitment to exploring the feminization
of fat they inadvertently create the perception that men’s weight concerns pale in
relation to women’s and are of very recent vintage.
Taking our lead from Michael Kimmel (2000: 5) we intend to build on and
review these feminist approaches to gender and body image by also making men
and masculinity visible. As Kimmel (2000: 5–6) highlights, ‘Men, themselves, are
invisible as men. Rarely, if ever do we see a course that examines the lives of men
as men.’ Indeed, men seldom appear on the pages or in the indexes of texts
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 111
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
dealing with fatness and body image, and we have little sense of their experiences.
In this article, we argue that it is important to understand men as gendered as
well – especially given that men in general (and white men in particular) enjoy
both the privilege and the curse of invisibility. Of course, we acknowledge that
an interest in difference and gender systems can pull us away from focusing on
the political dimensions of relations between the sexes (cf. Brownell and Wasser-
strom, 2002: 6). Therefore, we would like to state at the outset that we recognize
that women are victimized by the ‘tyranny of slenderness’ (Chernin, 1981) more
acutely than men and acknowledging the possibility of male weight concerns
does not minimize the findings about women, weight and body issues (cf.
Nichter, 2000). Ultimately, however, the picture is far more complicated than
this, as this article intends to show.
‘The World is Yours . . . But Only if You Aren’t Fat’
Putting Men in the Frame of Fat History
One of the major assumptions of those feminist scholars who do attempt to
consider male body image is that if men are concerned at all with weight, this
has been a very recent change (e.g. Chernin, 1981; Wolf, 1990; Faludi, 1991;
Bordo, 1993). Susan Bordo (1999: 218–19) tells us it was an implicit assumption
of earlier research that men were immune to body image problems. That they
have ‘discovered’ ‘the devil living in their flesh’ is, for Bordo, a recent develop-
ment. She writes, ‘I never dreamed that “equality” would move in the direction
of men worrying more about their looks rather than women worrying less’
(1999: 217–18). She argues that increasingly men and boys are being subjected to
the same ‘. . . complexly and densely institutionalized system of values and prac-
tices within which girls and women . . . come to believe that they are nothing
(and are frequently treated as nothing) unless they are trim, tight, lineless, bulge-
less, and sagless’ (Bordo, 1993: 32). However, Bordo assumes incorrectly that
men’s current concern with their bodies is a new phenomenon. Although it is
clear that women have over the last century been subjected to certain ‘aesthetic
pressures’ more intensively than men, the latter were not immune to these and
other pressures.
Three central challenges to the idea that male concerns with body weight have
only arisen in the last decade are posed in the work of Hillel Schwartz (1986);
Peter Stearns (1997); and Sander Gilman (2004) – each has written illuminating
cultural histories on fatness, dieting and weight. As Stearns (1997: 73) notes,
writers such as Naomi Wolf (1990) have failed to adequately historicize their
examinations of gender differentiation – a criticism that applies equally well to
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 112
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
other feminist scholars such as Faludi (1991); Bordo (1993, 1999); and Stinson
(2001). Gilman (2004: 1, 32) levels a similar criticism, adding that while scholar-
ship since the 1960s has focused almost entirely on women’s bodies and on patri-
archy, the body of the fat boy has, in fact, long been a source of ‘fascination,
concern, horror, [and] interest’ representing as he does ‘the outer limits of the
performance of masculinity’.
An examination of the broader historical context of current cultural preoccu-
pations with fat reveals that dieting and concerns with fatness have long been
with us, most especially in the last 100 years; moreover, these concerns have not
been limited solely to women (Gilman, 2004). Indeed, while dieting is associated
today ‘most immediately with women’, in the 19th century men were the arche-
typal dieters (Schwartz, 1986: 16–17). The early prominent supporters of dieting
(such as William Banting, Henry Lindlahr and Bernarr MacFadden) were gener-
ally male – as were many of their most prominent followers (Stearns, 1997: 74).
In exploring the trajectories of an increasing abhorrence towards fat through-
out the 19th and 20th centuries, Schwartz (1986) presents a clear sense of the
ways in which both women and men in the USA were caught up in a variety of
intersecting and at times contradictory discourses and technologies regarding fat
and bodily reduction. These increasingly came to focus specifically on fat and
fatness, linking it to gluttony (immorality), health, disease and a lack of will and
And while ideas about the nature of the gendered body under-
wrote these discourses and the ways in which fatness was being understood,
women and men were exposed to and indeed took up many of the technologies
that aimed to regulate the body through dieting, exercise, and measurement.
Stearns (1997) similarly traces the transformations in perceptions of fatness in
American society beginning in the late 19th century, when middle-class America
began its battle against body fat (between 1890 and 1910 specifically). In this initial
period men and women were seen to be equally culpable for their fatness.
However, the focus for men tended to center on muscle development as opposed
to appetite control, and advertisements increasingly depicted well-muscled,
scantily clad men with large but fat-free bodies (Stearns, 1997: 17). As Stearns also
points out, ‘men left fewer diaries than women did, so we have less direct evidence
of how widely they internalized the new injunctions’ (1997: 74). However,
A new men’s fashion arose too, as implacably hostile to fat in principle as the growing appeals
to female restraint in eating. Though some fashion histories have implied that women alone
were squeezed by the new attacks on fat, if only because they alone had to preen for courtship
and were somehow distinctively vulnerable to manipulation by mode, men’s standards were
thoroughly involved as well. The timing was identical, the use of shame and ridicule at least as
great. (Stearns, 1997: 16–17, emphasis added)
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 113
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Nevertheless, subtle gender differences were clearly evident from this early
period. Schwartz (1986: 17) suggests that when men undertook dieting it was
understood as a ‘muscular, willful act . . . an unburdening, a freeing up, a moral
athleticism’, while women dieters were seen to have less control, less capacity for
such transformations. Reduction campaigns directed at men were framed as
‘adventures’ that required action for success; those directed at women were
framed in terms of the need for watchfulness and nutritional education (1986: 18).
According to Stearns (1997), concerns with fatness did not become strongly
gender-differentiated until the 1920s – a period he labels the beginning of ‘the
misogynist phase’ (which lasted until the 1960s). He argues that it is not coinci-
dence that this gender differentiation occurred at precisely the point when many
earlier gender distinctions were beginning to be eroded:
The attack on female fat conjoined with the ongoing reduction of motherhood as a physical
task and as a cultural emblem for women. There is no question that this reduction coalesced
in the 1920s, building on more scattered signals from previous decades. (Stearns, 1997: 85–6)
During this period, the aesthetic standards for women became increasingly
rigid, while men were not subject to comparable pressures (Stearns, 1997: 72).
However, despite the growing gender differentiation witnessed in attitudes
towards overweight people, the pressures on men did not disappear and Stearns
warns that gender distinctions should not be exaggerated (Stearns, 1997: 78). He
points out that men continued to be subjected to ‘demanding bodybuilding
imagery’ through figures such as Charles Atlas and his muscularity campaign.
Indeed, males were exposed to this imagery at a very young age, given the regu-
larity with which Charles Atlas advertisements were featured in boys’ comic
books (1997: 76). As Stearns notes, ‘Though men talked far less about their battles
with fat, we need not assume that these did not occur’ (1997: 75).
Similarly, Schwartz (1986: 147) argues that the Roaring Twenties were equally
the ‘. . . ounce conscious, Grim twenties’. In this period gluttony had become
linked to fatness regardless of gender and a person’s weight was increasingly seen
to tell the truth about the self (1986: 147). Scales moved into the home to weigh
persons and portions, and Americans in particular began to move towards a more
weight-watching and weight-measuring culture (Schwartz, 1986:147).
Although the extensive diet columns that littered women’s magazines were not
present to the same degree in men’s publications, the latter invariably featured
slender male models and products which fostered consciousness of body image
(Stearns, 1997: 98–9). Men were also affected by changing fashion styles – even
if to a smaller degree than women. Like its female counterpart, male beachwear
became more revealing as the bathing suit gave way to the bare chest and short
bathers. Tapered suits replaced the double-breasted versions and paunches became
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 114
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
harder to conceal (Stearns, 1997: 100). The point is that this intensification of
pressure that so very clearly affected women, also affected men (Stearns, 1997:
100). However,
Men carried their concern about fat distinctively. They joined weight control organizations far
less commonly. They almost certainly talked less about their anxieties. They may have
minimized open expressions of concern, just as some women exaggerated their own worries;
the gender cultures were different . . . But the general pressure to keep reasonably trim, and
the moral evaluation that underlay it, bore on them as well, which is why the general process
of intensification must be discussed from the standpoint of the American middle-class as a
whole and not simply its hard-pressed female members. (Stearns, 1997: 102)
By the 1970s, men’s eagerness to lose weight had begun to match that of
women, and the gendered distinctions that previously existed had started to dissi-
pate – although men’s concerns continued to be expressed somewhat differently
from women’s (Stearns, 1997: 102; Gilman, 2004). This too can be seen in clothing,
for by the 1970s running gear and exercise clothes had become everyday attire for
both sexes (Schwartz, 1986: 255): fat had to be transformed into ‘fit’. Schwartz
argues that not only had more people come to believe they were overweight, more
people feared fat, were on guard against fat and were doing something about it
(1986: 246). Weight-watching was something to be undertaken at every phase of
one’s life and dieting, fasting, weighing and monitoring became a way of life in
Although their analyses are open to debate, the works of Schwartz (1986),
Stearns (1997) and Gilman (2004) clearly pose an important challenge to the idea
that the preoccupation with fatness has, until recently, been solely the domain of
girls and women. These authors all argue that weight concerns have been evident
in both genders, especially in the last century, although male weight concerns have
generally been less visible than those of women, and men have tended to manifest
their concerns somewhat differently. However, the lack of consideration given to
the work of either Schwartz (1986) or Stearns (1997) in feminist accounts
published more recently (e.g. Bordo, 1993; MacSween, 1993; Spitzack, 1990;
Stinson, 2001) has led to inadequate historical contextualization and the repeti-
tion of a simplistic trope which assumes that men were not affected by the
growing intolerance towards fat that emerged from the late 19th century onwards.
Anorexic Dominance and the Invisibility of the Fat Man
Without the historical context provided by scholars such as Schwartz, Stearns
and Gilman, the decreased visibility of male weight concerns could easily be read
as masculine indifference towards weight: an assumption that clearly underwrites
much early feminist scholarship on body image. Thus, Marcia Millman (1980: 237)
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 115
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
argues that as ‘almost all of the patients who go to diet doctors or join self-help
groups to lose weight are women . . . being fat is still more troublesome to and
for women than it is for men’. Kim Chernin (1981: 61–2) also argues that the
obsession with weight and dieting affects mostly women because ‘it is women
who constitute 95 percent of the people feeling sufficient despair with their bodies
to enroll them in a formal program of weight reduction’. Similar assumptions
continue to underwrite some of the more recent examinations of weight, such as
Kandi Stinson’s (2001) fascinating ethnographic study of a commercial weight
loss center in the USA, where the author points out that very few men attended
the weight loss center where she conducted her fieldwork. Those few who did
were invariably much larger than the women who attended meetings. For her,
‘the gender difference in ranges of overweight suggests that women and men may
differ in how much extra weight they can tolerate’ (Stinson, 2001: 38). However,
she does not consider the possibility that few men attend meetings because they
feel uncomfortable doing so. Indeed, her own findings would appear to support
this interpretation, given that she notes that on one of the rare occasions when she
saw men at the clinic, ‘of the three men who weighed in, only one stayed for the
meeting’ (Stinson, 2001: 32).
Many men engage with weight loss centers and programs like these through
female relatives or partners, something that Stinson (2001) notes but does not
explore. They eat and sometimes prepare the ‘diet’ meals and record their weights
at home. Moreover, WeightWatchers have been campaigning directly to men since
the 1960s, with little success. They are not, however, unaware of men’s reserva-
tions regarding attendance and have set up interesting alternatives that address
this. In WeightWatchers Australia’s most recent campaign, men can ‘weigh-in’,
engage in group discussions and compete with one another over kilos lost via an
online forum. Thus, while attending weight loss centers may have become the
‘special provenance of women’ (Schwartz, 1986: 210), men’s limited attendance
should not necessarily be read as an indicator of a general lack of anxiety about
fatness or body size.
Furthermore, the assumption that male concerns with body weight are recent
and pale in comparison to women’s is not borne out particularly well by the
statistics: either recent statistics or, more interestingly, those that are far older.
According to Hillel Schwartz (1986: 246–7), a study from the 1950s indicates
that 7 percent of men were on a diet and/or exercising to lose weight in compari-
son with 14 percent of women.
In 1973, 34 percent of men were on a diet and/or
exercising to lose weight in comparison with 49 percent of women. While these
studies clearly reveal an exponential increase in the numbers of people dissatis-
fied with their weight over the course of the 20th century, the differences
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 116
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
between men and women are not particularly great (a 7% difference in one case
and a 15% difference in another). According to a more recent study from 1997
(cited in Cash and Roy, 1999), 52 percent of men and 66 percent of women were
dissatisfied with their weight. Once again the trend towards increasing levels of
general weight dissatisfaction compared with earlier eras is evident, and the
difference between men and women continues to be relatively minor – 12 percent
overall. Yet despite the lack of fundamental differences in male and female levels
of body dissatisfaction, the discursive power of the feminist equation between
weight concerns and patriarchy is so great that scholars who cite these very
figures, such as Cash and Roy (1999: 213), continue to insist that ‘fat is (mostly)
a feminine issue’.
The tendency to overemphasize the differences between male and female
perceptions of body image is rather common within the literature. For example,
in Susan Bordo’s Unbearable Weight she argues that the contemporary preoccu-
pation with appearance ‘. . . still affects women far more powerfully than men’
(1993: 166). Although she qualifies this assertion in a footnote, noting that during
the late 1970s and 1980s male concerns with the body increased, she then goes on
to state that ‘study after study confirms, however, that there is still a large gender
gap in this area’ (p. 329: n 4, emphasis added). Yet, one of the key studies she cites
(Cash et al., 1986) actually indicates that the differences in levels of male and
female body dissatisfaction are not particularly great. Their study of 30,000 survey
respondents indicated that only 18 percent of men and 7 percent of women had
little concern about their appearance (1986: 30): a difference of 9 percent. When
asked to respond to the statement ‘I like my looks just the way they are’, 47
percent of men and 43 percent of women definitely or mostly agreed with it, while
34 percent of men and 38 percent of women definitely or mostly disagreed with
it (1986: 32): a difference of merely 4 percent! Moreover, in response to specific
questions about weight concerns, their survey revealed that 41 percent of men
were unhappy with their weight in comparison to 55 percent of women (a differ-
ence of 14%). They contrast this with a 1972 survey which indicated that 35
percent of men and 48 percent of women were unhappy with their looks (a differ-
ence of 13%). This study reinforces our earlier points that male and female body
image concerns have increased in tandem over the past century and that while
females have generally manifested more concern with weight than males, the
difference has never been more than 15 percent! Therefore, statements about ‘the
large gender gap’ between men and women and the ‘far more powerful’ weight
fears manifested by women need to be treated with a certain degree of caution.
This brings us to an important point. It is clear that the feminist literature
on gender and the body has registered discursive effects – especially given the
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 117
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
widespread way in which popular versions from the late 1970s to the early 1990s
have been taken up. Since the 1980s and continuing well into the 1990s eating
disorders have been highlighted ‘relentlessly’ in the media (Ambjörnsson, 2005:
119; see also Nichter, 2000). The public has become thoroughly familiarized with
eating disorders such as anorexia through documentaries, made-for-television
movies, novels, autobiographies (Brumberg, 1988: 14–16) and countless magazine
articles (Nichter, 2000: 3). Taking its cue from the available feminist scholarship,
much of this coverage has focused on eating disorders as culturally induced
illnesses and cultural forms of rebellion or withdrawal (Nichter, 2000). Indeed,
these cultural factors ‘exposed’ by feminist scholars are now well known and
raised in casual conversation on the topic (Brumberg, 1988: 31). Thus, as Leslie
Heywood (1996: 14) notes, these ‘. . . once hidden afflictions are now a part of an
everyday vocabulary, part of the discourse of disorder that seems to characterize
so much of late twentieth-century cultural phenomena’. Many people now believe
that eating disorders amongst adolescent girls are far more common than they
actually are, and the available literature has led to an increasing tendency to view
the behavior of teenage girls as ‘pathological’ (Nichter, 2000). Thus, ‘If earlier
generations of commentators were uncertain of or unconcerned with what pre-
occupied girls in their day-to-day lives and conversations, today everyone seems
to know what girls do: they obsess, mostly about fat’ (Ambjörnsson, 2005: 119).
The ‘normalization of dissatisfaction’ this popular feminist discourse produced
has, according to Fanny Ambjörnsson (2005), had certain effects. She writes,
Although much good has undoubtedly come of all that attention [from feminist scholars and
the media], the constant alarms that females were dissatisfied with their bodies appears to have
ended up conveying the impression that dissatisfaction is a normal female state. At some point,
talk about fat became talk about being a girl. (Ambjörnsson, 2005: 119)
What we (and Ambjörnsson) are suggesting is that while feminist scholarship
sought to unpack the ‘tyranny of slenderness’ (cf. Chernin, 1981), its impact has
been such that it has now become part of the discursive construction of feminin-
ity itself. In other words, this scholarship did not just make ‘visible’ the pressures
that women experience in relation to their body shape and size, it actively
produced (given the widespread way in which it was taken up) the idea that
contemporary femininity is bound up with the fear of fatness. Thus, in the
introduction to Obsession: the Tyranny of Slenderness Chernin (1981: 1; emphasis
added) asserts: ‘this is a book about woman’s obsession; in particular the suffer-
ing we experience in our obsession with weight, the size of our body, and our
longing for food’. As far as Chernin is concerned, she is speaking on behalf of all
women. Wolf (1990: 200) similarly asserts that ‘dieting is the essence of contem-
porary femininity’.
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 118
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
While subsequent feminist writings have tended to be more nuanced, recog-
nizing the different subject positions women inhabit on the basis of class, ethnic-
ity, sexuality and age, the assumption that the fear of fatness is something
fundamental to normative femininity underwrites many of the early influential
works. This is a message that has clearly been taken up. The comments of Czech
model Eva Herzigova on her recent weight loss are a perfect illustration of this
conflation between weight concerns and femininity. She states, ‘I didn’t do
anything to lose weight . . . in a way I’m not a true woman, obviously, because
every woman has a weight problem and I don’t’ (O’Neill, 2005: 16, emphasis
added). Yet, as both Mimi Nichter (2000) and Fanny Ambjörnsson (2005) point
out, the now commonplace assertions that most young girls feel ashamed or
dissatisfied with their bodies are somewhat simplistic.
In her nuanced and perceptive analysis, Nichter (2000) argues that many of
the available statistics on adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction are actually derived
from standard surveys that fail to adequately capture the complexity of their
behaviors. She writes,
what do the statistics that claim that 60 percent of teenaged girls are dieting actually mean?
What do girls really do when they’re on a diet?... Given the cultural imperative to be thin,
are girls overreporting their dieting on surveys because they feel they should be dieting?
(Nichter 2000: 3)
Nichter (2000) goes on to discuss a phenomenon she labels ‘fat talk’ – those ritu-
alized exchanges involving declarations of fatness by one girl accompanied by
strong protestations by another. According to Nichter, ‘fat talk’ plays a complex
role in girls’ and women’s lives. It is a form of social bonding and a key means
through which girls demonstrate their sameness to their friends. It is also a call
for support from peers and a way for friends to share positive comments as well
as build up group solidarity. However, Nichter makes the point that ‘talking the
talk’ is not an accurate barometer of dieting behavior and weight obsession (2000:
67). A number of the girls in her ethnographic study explained that although they
didn’t really think that they were too fat, they felt they had to complain about
their weight in order not to alienate their friends. According to Nichter (2000:
55), ‘Talking about her bodily imperfections establishes and maintains a girl’s
position as part of the group and makes it known that she doesn’t consider
herself better than any of the other girls.’
Ambjörnsson (2005) makes similar observations in her ethnographic study of
teenage girls at a Swedish school, arguing that while talk about dissatisfaction
with the body may to some extent reflect real frustration, there is more at work
in such assertions. She writes,
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 119
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Because the girls expect others to share similar concerns about their bodies, the experience of
worrying about fat is normalised; it is something you face because you are a girl. Expressing
dissatisfaction with one’s body becomes, in this sense, an important way of performing one’s
identity as a girl. (Ambjörnsson, 2005: 117)
This is an element of ‘fat talk’ that several girls in her study of Swedish teenagers
implicitly recognized. As one of these girls notes, ‘Don’t you think that the
problem is that you have to always talk about how you have problems being fat?
Cause if you didn’t people would find you cocky. So it’s really easier to just go
on complaining’ (2005: 118). In other words, that women should be dissatisfied
with their bodies is perceived as a normal state. As a female, to not express
discomfort with your body puts you at risk of censure and accusations of
conceitedness and arrogance. Indeed, another of the young women in Ambjörns-
son’s (2005) study, ‘Christine’, was marginalized by the other girls because she
did not express dissatisfaction with her body. According to Ambjörnsson, ‘She
risked being seen as arrogant, like a boy’ (2005: 118).
As we have seen, the idea that to be a woman is to be dissatisfied with one’s
body has been taken up far more broadly. However, this ‘fat is a woman’s issue’
trope is so powerful that many contemporary examinations of fatness and dieting
continue to overlook men. A consideration of male weight concerns remains
strikingly absent in much of the literature, aside from studies that explicitly focus
on gay male body issues (e.g. Millman, 1980; Atkins, 1998; Bordo, 1999). Indeed,
the common assumption seems to be that the only people who have internalized
fat oppressive attitudes are those of either sex who wish to be found attractive
by men (cf. Klein, 1996: 67).
Even when the authors make interesting compari-
sons between men and women, they invariably use these to highlight female
weight oppression, rather than considering what their observations actually say
about men’s experiences and perceptions of their bodies. Thus, in her recent
ethnography of a weight loss clinic, Kandi Stinson writes:
Antifat attitudes affect women and men differently. There is substantial evidence that women
are more dissatisfied with their bodies than are men, and that rates of body dissatisfaction are
increasing among women. Weight dissatisfaction is particularly central to assessments of body
satisfaction. Dissatisfied women almost always want to lose weight, whereas a substantial
number of men who are dissatisfied with their weight wish to gain. (Stinson, 2001: 6)
Stinson (2001) seems to assume that a male desire to put on weight is merely
evidence that men are less dissatisfied with their bodies than women, and does
not explore the interesting questions this desire raises. Cecilia Hartley similarly
assures us that when it comes to the tyranny of slenderness, ‘Men are under no
such size restrictions and are allowed – often encouraged – to take up as much
space as they can get away with’ (2001: 62). These authors implicitly recognize
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 120
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
that being ‘big’ is central to masculinity; however, Hartley (2001) and Stinson
(2001) simply assume that gaining weight and taking up space involves a relax-
ation of body controls rather than the application of quite different and often
very exacting ones.
While it is apparent that eating disorders such as anorexia and bulimia are
strongly gendered, with the vast majority of sufferers being female, there are a
number of men who engage in a quite different pattern of disordered eating and
exercise with similarly tragic health consequences. We are referring to obsessive
male body builders, known in body building culture as ‘bigorexics’ (Klein, 1993;
McCaughey, 1999). While this is now a recognized medical condition (muscle
dysmorphia), as Martha McCaughey notes, bigorexia has not been pathologized
in the same way that anorexia has (1999: 133). She argues that this asymmetry
exists because, ‘. . . we are so accustomed to positioning women as passive dupes
of a sexist culture, and men as willful agents who gain meaning and material
rewards from their activities, that we have missed the parallels between the two
body projects’ (1999: 134).
For McCaughey, both anorexia and bodybuilding are equally obsessive and
physically damaging (1999: 134). However, as she notes,
women’s control issues usually have to do with controlling the percentage of body fat, which
is large relative to men’s. Given that young men are more likely to look skinny than fat, their
bodily control issues are more likely to concern musculature. (McCaughey, 1999: 143)
Nevertheless, despite the desire for complete body mastery that both pursuits
entail, and the similarly tragic consequences of each, only anorexics are construed
as victims (McCaughey, 1999: 139). Clearly, alternative ‘interpretive possibilities’
(1999: 134) are generally disguised by the discursive power of the ‘fat as a feminine
issue’ trope. Thus, Cash and Roy (1999: 213) point to studies which indicate that
the number of diet articles and advertisements in women’s magazines greatly
outnumber the diet articles placed in magazines aimed at men, yet make little
of the information that one of the same studies indicates that men’s magazines
contain many more fitness-related articles and advertisements than women’s
magazines. We argue that given the focus on ‘bigness’ in constructions of
masculinity, these differences should hardly be taken as evidence of a widespread
male equanimity with the body.
Male Bodies: The Experience of Fatness
[As] a man, I’m not supposed to be as preoccupied about fat as women. Women are obliged
to consider thin as a precondition for success. A man of course doesn’t feel the same pressure,
but the pressure is there and it’s internalized. Not only does the world mostly hate his fat, he
hates it most himself. (Richard Klein, Eat Fat, 1996: 36)
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 121
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
As Olivardia et al. (2004: 112) note, ‘The body image concerns of men have not
been addressed in the scientific literature nearly as extensively as the body image
concerns of women.’ Pope et al.’s The Adonis Complex (2000) represents one of
the few concerted attempts to systematically explore body image concerns amongst
In this book they argue that men, like women, are also subject to increas-
ingly unrealistic body ideals – they point out that GI Joe’s body is just as ridicu-
lous and unobtainable for the average boy as Barbie’s body is for the average girl
(2000: 40–4). They make a number of interesting points in their book regarding
the connection between muscularity and masculinity and the ways that construc-
tions of masculinity have made male body concerns less visible than women’s.
The authors point out that men are also dissatisfied with their looks and that men
frequently have a distorted body image (2000: 30), but that their concerns tend
to centre on a desire to be big and muscular, as opposed to merely ‘thin’.
However, the book suffers from the same sort of flaws that plague the early
feminist critiques of the tyranny of slenderness, such as a failure to historically
locate their discussion and a tendency to simply invert the feminist position and
argue that, actually, men have got it worse than women. In their words:
Although both men and women are besieged with images of unattainably beautiful bodies,
there’s an extra twist for men – namely that anabolic steroids can make men far bigger than
they could naturally be. Of course, female models can also use various drugs and cosmetic tech-
niques to look better. But women really have no equivalent of anabolic steroids – a chemical
that can blast them far beyond the outer limits of what Mother Nature intended. (Pope et al.,
2000: 240)
They argue that women have learnt over the years how to confront the imposs-
ible beauty ideals that they are confronted with, rather than letting them fester
inside. Men, on the other hand, because of the societal taboo against expressing
their feelings, must suffer in silence. However, as Gilman (2004: 7) demonstrates
in his analysis of a range of historical male figures marked in various ways by
their fatness, ‘Masculinity is not simply a parallel construct to femininity but has
its own complex [and often contradictory] history, as do the meanings attached
to the fat boy’s body.’
Despite the problems with their work, Olivardia et al. (2004) powerfully
make the point that the current standards of physical attractiveness are certainly
difficult for most people to achieve – whether they are female or male. These
body pressures are especially prominent amongst men working in industries
focused strongly on the body (especially professional sports, the movie and
music industries).
Susan Faludi (1999) provides a revealing anecdote regarding actor Sylvester
concerns over putting on weight for the movie Copland. She writes,
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 122
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
In August of 1996, I met the actor for a drink in the bar of his habitual Manhattan lodgings,
the Four Seasons Hotel. He lumbered in wearing a baggy Hawaiian shirt bunched up over a
protruding gut, and shambled across the room with his eyes trained on the floor. His demeanor
was only partly related to an effort to stay in the character of the hapless, overweight sheriff.
He was also just plain embarrassed. The first month had been the worst, he said. He was ‘cut
down to the ground’. He could barely stand to be seen in public with such flab. For weeks he
was frantically ‘issuing disclaimers’, as he put it. ‘This isn’t me!’ he recalled telling people. ‘I’m
doing this for a film!’ ‘I should’ve gotten a little sign. I started doing it with strangers. “Hi,
how ya doing? This isn’t me!”
In spite of the mortifying stares, Stallone was not sorry he’d put on the weight. The flesh,
he felt, freed him from a more humiliating fate: that of a man forever before the mirror. ‘What
I was doing was purely – I don’t want to put down working out, it’s good, but you become
incredibly self-conscious. You are always aware of yourself; you are just aware of yourself. Do
I look as good as I did yesterday? You are always looking for a reflection in windows and
things. I don’t think there’s ever a moment, including when you are alone in your own house,
when you are not constantly aware of every aspect of how you look’. (Faludi, 1999: 582–3)
While this quote reveals a degree of bodily alienation and self-surveillance that
resonates strongly with female body obsessions, Sly’s hatred of his fat – and its
emasculating effects – are strongly apparent.
Scholars such as Richard Klein (1996: 56), Ganapati Durgadas (1998), Alex
Robertson Textor (1999), Jerry Mosher (2001) and Sander Gilman (2004) have all
pointed to the feminizing effects of fatness on men in historical and contempor-
ary imaginings. According to Durgadas (1998: 370), ‘fleshly bulk or stoutness in
females implies inappropriate strength or toughness.
In males, it represents
womanlike weakness or physical impressionability.’ Similarly, Textor (1999: 222)
argues that ‘fat men have an uneven purchase on “masculinity” in American
Importantly, associations between male fatness and femininity are not particu-
larly recent. Paula Saukko (1999: 34) recounts that in the 1920s endocrinologists
often diagnosed young chubby boys with ‘Froehlich’s syndrome’, a supposed
pituitary dysfunction thought to cause obesity, genital underdevelopment, and an
effeminate appearance. Scholar Michael Moon admits that his own adolescent
chubbiness was a deep source of concern growing up. He states, ‘It was a deep fear
of mine as a twelve-year-old boy putting on pubescent weight that after having
been a slender child I was at puberty freakishly and unaccountably developing
feminine hips and breasts’ (Moon and Sedgewick, 2001: 292). He discusses his
fear of becoming like his aging male piano teacher who was called a ‘fat ass pansy’
(Moon and Sedgewick, 2001: 293) because of his large backside.
Gynecomastia (‘women’s breasts’) – a condition that causes male breasts to
become unusually large – is an interesting case in point. It is not uncommon
among adolescent boys and is caused by a number of factors, including weight
gain, and, in older men, steroid use (Yost, 2004). In the bodybuilding world the
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 123
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
condition is referred to as ‘bitch tits’ and as a bodybuilder on the BBC’s Body
Hits: Sports Junkies commented, ‘everyone is afraid of this [gynecomastia] the
most’ (Marsden, 2005). In the book Fight Club (Palahniuk, 1996) ex-bodybuilder
and steroid user ‘Bob’ is only able to retrieve his lost masculinity – destroyed
through the removal of his testicles following testicular cancer and evidenced by
his ‘bitch tits’ – by joining a secret ‘fight club’ where men reclaim their masculin-
ity through violent spectacle.
Many men aside from bodybuilders fear getting larger breasts when they put
on weight – as ‘man boobs’ can be a humiliating source of mockery and jest. For
example, Australian Federal Health Minister Tony Abbott derisively labeled the
ex-Australian Labor party leader Mark Latham ‘Dr Man Boobs’ following
Latham’s appearance in tight cricket whites (Weekend Australian Magazine,
2004). In a similar vein, former US President Bill Clinton was often hounded by
the press over his soft, corpulent, spongy and apparently undisciplined body and
his abundant appetite for fast food. For some this created an image of emotion-
ality, openness and enjoyment of life, for others it was more emasculating, indi-
cating a lack of firmness, strength and self-control (Bordo, 1999: 55). Indeed,
while John F. Kennedy is remembered for his numerous indiscretions, he, unlike
Clinton, is not rendered as an undisciplined ‘boy’ with an unruly appetite
(Bordo, 1999: 56).
For many men, having what is seen to be a feminized body, be it from weight
gain or steroid use, is greatly feared. As Jonathan Wander writes ‘[i]f you’re a
twelve year-old boy with breasts, you’d rather die than suffer the embarrassment
of running up the court topless’ (in Gilman, 2004: 232). Indeed, surgeons treating
gynecomastia comment that some men also develop Body Dysmorphic Disorder
(BDD) and will return several times for more surgery, believing that they can still
see breasts (Marsden, 2005).
As Jerry Mosher (2001: 170) notes, this feminizing aspect of fatness can
become particularly acute in extremely overweight males, as the penis is reduced
in proportion to body size, or is rendered invisible by the stomach. According
to Raoul, a man interviewed in The Secret Lives of Fat People, ‘All my life I’ve
felt that my penis was too small.... My stomach is just too big. Even when I
have an erection, I can’t see my penis’ (Klingman, 1981: 111; Mosher, 2001: 170).
Schwartz (1986: 248) argues that a clear association between fatness, diminished
testicles and sexual impotence developed in the 1950s and 1960s, which paralleled
earlier arguments linking menopause with an increase in women’s body size and
a reduction in sexual desire.
Today, jokes about the male ‘paunch’ or ‘middle-
age spread’ often centre upon the invisibility of the penis and the imputation of
male ‘pregnancy’.
As Mosher (2001: 187) notes, the fat male is often understood
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 124
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
and represented as ‘. . . male but not masculine’; similarly, Gilman (2004: 19)
writes, ‘the very notion of a hobbled masculinity seems to be built into the image
of the fat man’.
Complicating the Picture
While fatness may be feminizing and an important focus of self-loathing for
many men, we recognize that the meanings of male fatness (and female fatness
for that matter) are complex, shifting and often contradictory. Joan Gross (2005)
argues that in black rap culture fatness has been lyrically redefined as hyper-
masculine. Citing the existence of numerous fat black rappers such as Heavy D,
Big Punisher, Fat Joe and Biggie Smalls, she argues that fatness in this context
represents an important assertion of masculinity. She writes,
First and foremost in this definition of masculinity is control – being in control of other men,
women and financial resources. Through brute force, which is closely correlated with body
size, men gain respect and access to wealth. Literally and figuratively they can throw their
weight around. Fatness is not viewed as a sign of lack of control but as a means by which
control is attained. (Gross, 2005: 67)
For Gross (2005: 76) fatness in this sub-cultural context symbolizes the desire
to take up space and be recognized. Moreover, it is clear that this dimension of
fatness is also present (if not so starkly highlighted) in its more mainstream
cultural meanings. As Richard Klein writes,
It seems clear to me, a man, that my constant dissatisfaction with my fat is nothing like what
it would be if I were a woman. In fact, like a lot of men, there are times when I value and
appreciate my fat. I don’t feel it diminishes my appeal; it makes me feel bigger and stronger,
more impressive and more serious. (1996: 66)
Wayne Johnson, a man interviewed by Marcia Millman (1980: 235) in Such a
Pretty Face, similarly notes, ‘I like being big. In my head, being big means being
However, we would argue that the power connected with fat is also present
in some female accounts of fatness. In The Secret Lives of Fat People, Mildred
Klingman (1981: 99) describes Suzanne, a college professor who weighs over 300
pounds: ‘In spite of all its drawbacks, the fat made her feel powerful. When she
walked into a room people paid attention to her and, in some cases, deferred to
her.’ Another woman, Sheila, described by Cordell and Ronai, similarly states,
I always say I was a small person with a big person inside of me. I never felt comfortable as a
small person, I always felt a little self-conscious.... Im more comfortable as a big person....
I feel more in charge, more in command. I feel like when I walk into a room people take notice,
and not just because I look good, but because they’re looking for something . . . they’re looking
for me to do something. (1999: 34)
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 125
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
As more recent scholars writing about fatness have noted, the meanings of
fatness intersect with other aspects of identity such as class, ethnicity and sexu-
ality to a significant degree (see Atkins, 1998; Evans Braziel and LeBesco, 2001).
Thus, studies have suggested that the fear of fatness is most acute amongst
middle-class white adolescent females and that girls from other ethnic groups –
particularly African Americans – are more content with their body weight (e.g.
Nichter, 2000).
Moreover, several lesbian publications and internet forums
valorize the fat female form (see LeBesco, 2004: chs 3, 7) and endeavor to eroti-
cize ‘. . . fat women within a framework of lesbian desire’ (Textor, 1999: 234).
We would argue that the lived experience of fatness is just as complicated and
contradictory for men as it is for women – male fat is similarly crosscut by
multiple factors such as class, ethnicity and sexuality. However, while scholar-
ship has thoroughly researched the contradictions that emerge from female
experiences of fatness and the complex factors that intersect with these experi-
ences, little investigation has been undertaken into male experiences of fatness
and the complexities and contradictions they also entail in and through time.
Before closing, we would also like to point out that in this era of the alleged
global ‘obesity epidemic’, ‘the predominant discourse about fat . . . is a medical
one that pathologically constructs fat bodies as “obese”’ (LeBesco, 2004: 29; see
also Gilman, 2004). And while Gilman (2004) has argued that ‘obesity as a
category . . . has always been a means of seeing the fluidity of bodies by defining
their ultimate, pathological state’, in the current environment, dieticians and
nutritionists have taken up new and more socially sanctioned roles as inter-
national ‘fat police’. So widely is the net of deviance and its attendant gaze being
cast, that it is impossible to continue to deny or downplay the impact of the war
on fat on both women and men.
As Campos (2004: xvii, xviii) points out, while this ‘cultural hysteria’ has
‘especially devastating consequences for women’, men are also ‘show[ing] signs
of the damage that is done to people when they are told constantly that there is
something fundamentally wrong with them’. In the era of ‘globesity’ (as the
World Health Organization has labeled the international ‘obesity epidemic’),
obese people are seen to be ‘fat’ first, and only secondarily are seen to possess
ancillary characteristics (Degher and Hughes, 1999: 13) such as gender – a factor
not adequately acknowledged in many recent studies of fatness.
We have argued in this article that men have also been exposed to the growing
malevolence towards fat and fatness that emerged in the late 19th century. How
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 126
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
men have experienced, articulated and responded to these aesthetic pressures has
received little attention in the popular and scholarly literature to date. This is due,
in part, to a focus on patriarchy as the source of the fear of fatness as well as a
notable lack of attention to the cultural history of fat. The assumption that men
were immune to body image issues historically and are only now coming to be
affected by fat oppression underwrites much of this literature, in which men and
the fat man in particular are sometimes seen but rarely heard. This is partly due
to the productive nature of the feminist discourse which came to see fat as a pecu-
liarly women’s issue.
We have suggested that many men are concerned about fat and weight loss and
that this is not merely a recent development. While it may have become more
acute in recent decades, fatness has long had threatening implications for men,
given the ways it potentially undermines normative forms of masculinity. Clearly,
men articulate their weight concerns differently from women and their experi-
ences need to be explored in more detail. We advocate further study to consider
the experiences of both men and women. While it is important not to overlook
the political dimensions of relations between the sexes, studying men and women
in isolation runs the risk of fundamentally misrepresenting their experiences of
1. It is especially interesting given the presence of a female contestant of a similar size (Casey) in
the same series. While Casey did receive a great deal of criticism regarding her weight on the internet
forum set up for fans of the show, the media and the show’s judges were careful not to comment on
her appearance. No doubt this was partially in deference to her youth – at 16 she was the youngest of
the show’s contestants. However, if they had commented on her weight it is likely that a flurry of
media attention would have followed, similar to that generated by Dicko’s comments on Paulini the
previous year.
2. Gilman’s (2004) Fat Boys is an important exception. It provides an insightful albeit sweeping
analysis of some of the ways in which the fat man has been imagined, defined and represented in
‘Western’ culture, literature and medical discourse and how this has affected men’s experience of their
own bodies and those of others.
3. Although Millman seems to recognize that her ability to generalize based on her interviews is
limited (especially given that the men she interviewed all became overweight in middle age, that they
were generally older than the women she interviewed, and that many had previously been athletes),
she argues that they nevertheless illuminate ‘. . . important differences in the experiences of fat men
and women’ (1980: 237). The implication is that these men are actually representative of all fat men.
4. Bordo (1999: 216) argues that ‘The world is yours . . . but only if you aren’t fat’ is the message
the media and film industries give to women. We argue that it applies to both men and women.
5. Bordo (1999: 284) does note that men’s attitudes towards fat have not been adequately
researched; by this she means how men see fat on women, how they are brought up on images of the
ideal female body just like girls, and the impact this has. She doesn’t buy the argument (she says rumor)
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 127
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
that men are more tolerant of female fat than has been realized. She says that while they might reject
the ‘Auschwitz thinness’ of Kate Moss they mostly want trim, tight and toned girlfriends.
6. Indeed, two of the most extreme groups of dieters and weightwatchers over the last two
centuries have been jockeys and pugilists, the vast majority of whom were men (Schwartz, 1986: 17).
7. For a discussion of earlier periods and recurring themes in ‘Western’ history see Gilman (2004).
8. According to Schwartz (1986: 247), one of the reasons that the market for products was
expanding was that more and more men and especially businessmen were dieting. Men’s weight-
watching, he argues, cut across class lines (1986: 247). ‘The image of the man gone to pot, fat and
feminine, was increasingly common as appetite and exercise became more important in the 1950s
and 60s’ (1986: 248).
9. However, even in ‘gay culture’, the preference for a slim and muscular male body is not
universal. The existence of the ‘big men’s movement’ (Textor, 1999), bear subculture and gay ‘chubby
chasers’ (see Millman, 1980: 245–6; Bunzl, 2005) speaks to the eroticization of the large male body that
has occurred in some segments of the gay population. Moreover, fatness seems to have taken on
increasingly positive connotations with the spread of HIV/AIDS in gay communities, as it comes to
signify health and lack of infection (Textor, 1999: 230).
10. Bordo (1993: 151–2) does recognize the parallels between bodybuilding and anorexia to a
certain degree; however, she focuses exclusively on female bodybuilding. Male bodybuilding does not
enter the picture at all.
11. Susan Bordo (1999) has also written a book focusing on the male body; however, she provides
little discussion of male weight concerns. Nevertheless, she similarly recognizes that for men, a hard
body is a ‘take no shit body’, a body that makes one feel ‘safe, respected and in control’, ‘radiat[ing]
independence, toughness and emotional imperviousness’, self control, morality and health (Bordo,
1999: 57).
12. Susan Bordo (1993) actually uses Sylvester Stallone as a perfect (if a little extreme) example of
the ways in which men monitor the weight of their partners and the importance of slimness to them.
According to Bordo, Sylvester Stallone told his girlfriend, Cornelia Guest, that he liked his woman
‘anorexic’. In response, she ‘immediately lost twenty-four pounds’ (1993: 334, n. 24). However, as
Faludi’s discussion makes clear, if Sly does have rigid body ideals that he expects his girlfriends to
adhere to, these are standards he also enacts just as rigidly upon himself.
13. It could therefore be argued that if fat feminizes men, it inversely masculinizes women, and is
therefore similarly stigmatizing for females. However, given the ways in which the female body has
been constructed as inferior to the male body (see Martin, 1987), we would suggest that the feminiz-
ing dimensions of fatness are more threatening for men than the masculinizing effects of fatness on
14. Although it seems likely that this association developed considerably earlier (see also Gilman,
2004). In Ulaby’s (2001) discussion of the 1920s film star Fatty Arbuckle’s trial for the rape and murder
of Virginia Rappe in 1921, similar connections between fatness and impotence were clearly present in
the popular accounts of Arbuckle’s alleged attack.
15. However, as Texter (1999: 228) notes, the ‘beer belly’ is also ‘overloaded with masculine
signatory presence’. In a similar vein, Kapferer (1988: 156) argues that the Australian ‘beer gut’ or ‘beer
belly’ is viewed as a physical indication of one’s capacity to drink and a source of pride for some –
although it has fallen into disrepute in recent years ‘partly as a result of the cult of fitness’.
16. However, this perspective has been challenged by some. Regina Williams, the chair of the
Detroit chapter of NAAFA, believes that there are limits on the apparent ‘fat acceptance’ in African
American communities (LeBesco, 2004: 61).
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 128
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Advertiser (2005) ‘MP Up in Arms at Kyle’, URL (consulted 17 October 2005): http://bendigo. &story_id=
Ambjörnsson, Fanny (2005) ‘Fat Talk’, pp. 109–20 in D. Kulick and A. Meneley (eds) Fat: The Anthro-
pology of an Obsession. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
Atkins, Dawn, ed. (1998) Looking Queer: Body Image and Identity in Lesbian, Bisexual, Gat and
Transgender Communities. New York: Haworth.
Bordo, Susan (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
Bordo, Susan (1999) The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and Private. New York: Farrar,
Straus and Giroux.
Brownell, Susan and Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom, eds (2002) ‘Introduction’, pp. 1–41 in Chinese Feminini-
ties/Chinese Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Brumberg, Joan (1988) Fasting Girls: the Emergence of Anorexia Nervosa as a Modern Disease.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bunzl, Matti (2005) ‘Chasers’, pp. 199–210 in D. Kulick and A. Meneley (eds) Fat: The Anthropology
of an Obsession. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
Campos, Paul (2004) The Obesity Myth: Why Our Obsession with Weight is Hazardous to Our
Health. London: Penguin.
Cash, Thomas and Robin E. Roy (1999) ‘Pounds of Flesh: Weight, Gender, and Body Images’,
pp. 209–28 in J. Sobal and D. Maurer (eds) Interpreting Weight: The Social Management of Fatness
and Thinness. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Cash, Thomas F., Barbara A. Winstead and Louis H. Janda (1986) ‘The Great American Shape-Up’,
Psychology Today April: 30–7.
Chernin, Kim (1981) The Obsession: Reflections on the Tyranny of Slenderness. New York: Harper.
Chernin, Kim (1986) The Hungry Self: Women, Eating and Identity. New York: Random House.
Cordell, Gina and Carol Rambo Ronai (1999) ‘Identity Management Among Overweight Women:
Narrative Resistance to Stigma’, pp. 29–48 in J. Sobal and D. Maurer (eds) Interpreting Weight:
The Social Management of Fatness and Thinness. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Degher, Douglas and Gerald Hughes (1999) ‘The Adoption and Management of a “Fat” Identity’,
pp. 11–28 in J. Sobal and D. Maurer (eds) Interpreting Weight: The Social Management of Fatness
and Thinness. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Durgadas, Ganapati (1998) ‘Fatness and the Feminized Man’, pp. 367–71 in D. Atkins (ed.) Looking
Queer: Body Image and Identity in Lesbian, Bisexual, Gat and Transgender Communities. New
York: Haworth.
Evans Braziel, Jana and Kathleen LeBesco, eds (2001) Bodies Out of Bounds: Fatness and Trans-
gression. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Faludi, Susan (1991) Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women. London: Chatto and Windus.
Faludi, Susan (1999) Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man. New York: HarperCollins.
Ferraro, Kenneth and Kimberlee B. Holland (2002) ‘Physical Evaluation of Obesity in Health Surveys:
“Who Are You Calling Fat?”’, Social Science & Medicine 55: 1401–13.
Gard, Michael and Jan Wright (2005) The Obesity Epidemic: Science, Morality and Ideology. London:
Gilman, Sander L. (2004) Fat Boys: A Slim Book. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Gross, Joan (2005) ‘Phat’, pp. 63–76 in D. Kulick and A. Meneley (eds) Fat: The Anthropology of an
Obsession. New York: Jeremy P Tarcher/Penguin.
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 129
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Hartley, Cecilia (2001) ‘Letting Ourselves Go: Making Room for the Fat Body in Feminist Scholarship’,
pp. 74–90 in J.E. Braziel and K. LeBesco (eds) Bodies Out of Bounds: Fatness and Transgression.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Heywood, Leslie (1996) Dedicated to Hunger: The Anorexic Aesthetic in Modern Culture. Berkeley,
CA: University of California Press.
Joanisse, Leanne and Anthony Synnott (1999) ‘Fighting Back: Reactions and Resistance to the Stigma
of Obesity’, pp. 49–72 in J. Sobal and D. Maurer (eds) Interpreting Weight: The Social Manage-
ment of Fatness and Thinness. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kapferer, Bruce (1988) Legends of People, Myths of State: Violence, Intolerance and Political Culture
in Sri Lanka and Australia. Bathurst: Crawford House.
Kimmel, Michael (2000) The Gendered Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klein, A.M. (1993) Little Big Men: Bodybuilding Subculture and Gender Construction. Albany, NY:
State University of New York.
Klein, Richard (1996) Eat Fat. New York: Pantheon.
Klein, Richard (2001) ‘Fat Beauty’, pp. 19–38 in J.E. Braziel and K. LeBesco (eds) Bodies Out of
Bounds: Fatness and Transgression. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Klingman, Mildred (1981) The Secret Lives of Fat People. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Kulick, Don and Anne Meneley, eds (2005) Fat: The Anthropology of an Obsession. New York: Jeremy
P. Tarcher/Penguin.
Lawrence, Marilyn (1984) The Anorexic Experience. London: Woman’s Press.
LeBesco, Kathleen (2004) Revolting Bodies? The Struggle to Redefine Fat Identity. Amherst, MA:
University of Massachusetts Press.
Leone, Vicki (2003) ‘An Image of Success’, The Age, URL (consulted 17 October 2005): http://www.
McCaughey, Martha (1999) ‘Fleshing Out the Discomforts of Femininity: The Parallel Case of Female
Anorexia and Male Compulsive Body Building’, in J. Sobal and D. Maurer (eds) Weighty Issues:
Fatness and Thinness as Social Problems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
MacSween, Morag (1993) Anorexic Bodies: A Feminist and Sociological Perspective on Anorexia Nervosa.
London: Routledge.
Marsden, John (2005) Body Hits: Sports Junkies. BBC Production, aired on the ABC, 22 September
Martin, Emily (1987) The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA:
Beacon Press.
Millman, Marcia (1980) Such a Pretty Face: Being Fat in America. New York: W.W. Norton.
Moon, Michael and Eve Kosofsky Sedgewick (2001) ‘Divinity: A Dossier, a Performance Piece, a Little-
understood Emotion’, pp. 292–328 in J.E. Braziel and K. LeBesco (eds) Bodies Out of Bounds:
Fatness and Transgression. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Mosher, Jerry (2001) ‘Setting Free the Bears: Refiguring Fat Men on Television’, pp. 166–93 in
J.E. Braziel and K. LeBesco (eds) Bodies Out of Bounds: Fatness and Transgression. Berkeley, CA:
University of California.
Nichter, Mimi (2000) Fat Talk: What Girls and their Parents Say about Dieting. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Olivardia, Roberto, Harrison G. Pope Jr., John J. Borowiecki III and Geoffrey H. Cohane (2004)
‘Biceps and Body Image: The Relationship Between Muscularity and Self-esteem, Depression, and
Eating Disorder Symptoms’, Psychology of Men and Masculinity 5(2): 112–20.
O’Neill, Helen (2005) ‘The Big Fat Diet Dilemma’, The Weekend Australian Magazine 8–9 January:
Orbach, Susie (1978) Fat is a Feminist Issue. New York: Berkeley.
Orbach, Susie (1986) Hunger Strike. London: Faber and Faber.
Body & Society Vol. 13 No. 1
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 130
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Palahniuk, Chuck (1996) Fight Club. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Pope, Harrison G. Jr., Katherine A. Phillips and Roberto Olivardia (2000) The Adonis Complex: The
Secret Crisis of Male Body Obsession. New York: The Free Press.
Probyn, Elspeth (2000) Carnal Appetites: FoodSexIdentities. London: Routledge.
Rowe, Kathleen (1990) ‘Roseanne: Unruly Woman as Domestic Goddess’, Screen, 31(4): 408–19.
Saukko, Paula (1999) ‘Fat Boys and Goody Girls: Hilde Bruch’s Work on Eating Disorders and the
American Anxiety about Democracy, 1930–1960’, pp. 31–49 in J. Sobal and D. Maurer (eds)
Weighty Issues: Fatness and Thinness as Social Problems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Schwartz, Hillel (1986) Never Satisfied: A Cultural History of Diets, Fantasies and Fat. New York:
Sobal, Jeffrey and Donna Maurer, eds (1999a) Weighty Issues: Fatness and Thinness as Social Problems.
New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Sobal, Jeffrey and Donna Maurer, eds. (1999b) Interpreting Weight: The Social Management of Fatness
and Thinness. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Spitzack, Carole (1990) Confessing Excess: Women and the Politics of Body Reduction. New York:
Stearns, Peter (1997) Fat History: Bodies and Beauty in the Modern West. New York: New York
University Press.
Stinson, Kandi (2001) Women and Dieting Culture: Inside a Commercial Weight Loss Group. New
Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Textor, Alex Robertson (1999) ‘Organization, Specialization, and Desires in the Big Men’s Movement:
Preliminary Research in the Study of Subculture-Formation’, Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual
Identity 4(3): 217–39.
Ulaby, Neda (2001) ‘Roscoe Arbuckle and the Scandal of Fatness’, pp. 153–65 in J.E. Braziel
and K. LeBesco (eds) Bodies Out of Bounds: Fatness and Transgression. Berkeley, CA: University
of California.
Weekend Australian Magazine (2004) ‘Analyse This: Latham and Abbott – the Pollie Pinch Test’, 31
July–1 August: 12.
Wolf, Naomi (1990) The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. London:
Yost, James Merle (2004), URL (consulted 18 October 2005): http://www.gyneco
Kirsten Bell is an Honorary Associate in the Anthropology Department at Macquarie University in
Sydney, Australia. Her key research interests relate to the anthropology of biomedicine and the
cultural underpinnings of public health discourses connected with obesity, tobacco and circumcision.
Darlene McNaughton is an Honorary Associate with the Centre for Resource and Environment
Studies at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Her research interests include the
nature of subalternity and stigma, indigenous environmental philosophy and mining, and the cultural
dimensions of public health discourses on obesity.
Feminism and the Invisible Fat Man
05 074780 BellF 14/2/07 9:39 pm Page 131
at Flinders University on November 22, 2012bod.sagepub.comDownloaded from
... Monaghan (2008b) draws our attention to the fact that the violence associated with the war on obesity is of particular concern to women because they experience fat hatred as a gendered (misogynistic) practice, but men who embody what Connell (1995) conceptualized as "marginalized or subordinated masculinities" also risk humiliation and hyper(in)visibility due to fatphobia. Bell and McNaughton (2007) state, "fatness has long had threatening implications for men, given the ways it potentially undermines normative forms of masculinity" (127). Fatness has the potential to emasculate men, especially if the fat is distributed in the hips or chest. ...
... Fatness has the potential to emasculate men, especially if the fat is distributed in the hips or chest. Men with adipose tissue in their chest are often said to have "man boobs" (Bell and McNaughton 2007;Lozano-Sufrategui et al. 2016;Monaghan 2008a). However, one component of hegemonic masculinity is to take up space, which fat bodies do. ...
Full-text available
... In other campaigns the image was a guy and nobody complained at all. Bias and a lot of ofendidit@ 2 Bell and McNaughton (2007) highlighted that men's body concerns have remained largely hidden, and there is a connection between fatness and feminising. Until recently, much of the literature has focused on women's bodies (e.g. ...
... The sampling was purposive, with demographic variables taken into account (Goodson and Sikes 2017). It is justified by the tradition of research into gender and corporality, which indicate that these are important factors that differentiate body experience (Bell and McNaughton 2007;Kwan and Holtom 2019). We interviewed four cisgender people (two women and two men) and two transgender people in the process of transition (one male and one female); 2 two in rural areas, two in a medium-sized city (population of 200,000), and two in a huge city (population of over 500,000). ...
Full-text available
The article offers an analysis of living with a fat body and ways of experiencing it in everyday life in the context of stigmatization of this type of corporality. Biographical interviews with fat people of varying socio-demographic profiles were conducted. The analyses show that having a fat body/being fat is generally a stigma that discredits the individual in the eyes of the so-called normals based on both physical characteristics and character traits allegedly associated with fatness. The participants mainly medicalize and internalize the stigma of fatness and manage it specifically by passing, covering, and coming out. In transgender people, fatness may never take on the char-acteristics of a stigma, but instead allows the individual to obscure another stigma or conform to social expectations of appearance in line with the gender identity.
In this chapter, our exploration delves deeper into the construction of masculinities and their intersection with chronic disease. Our attention now shifts toward the specificities of the visual self-presentations of diabetic men on TikTok. Drawing from—as far as I know—the first digital research exploring this topic, particular attention will be paid to three themes that emerged as relevant from the study, namely: the display of the diabetic body, the display of men’s emotional statuses, and the presentation of food consumption practices in the complex process of constructing, representing, and performing masculinities. Overall, the discussion of the main findings shows that self-representations of diabetic men on social media platforms can open a window to observing the ongoing shifts in masculinities. Particularly, this insight reveals how practices related to health intersect, sometimes inextricably, with gender practices, forming new and innovative ways of enacting masculinities.
Drawing on a qualitative content analysis of 76 “day of eating” vlogs, this article explores how cis men adhering to the “If It Fits Your Macros” diet dynamically negotiate the meanings of their eating habits and their bodies to bolster their claims to hegemonic masculinity. Employing Foucault’s theory of disciplinary technologies and critical masculinities scholarship, the analysis serves as a case study of how the body work of dieting men reinforces normative discourses of masculinity. While dieting has previously been framed as a “technology of femininity,” this article argues that dieting similarly operates as an embodied practice through which men perform masculinities. Extending the literature on the subjective experiences of dieting men, I suggest that men navigate the ostensibly “feminine” terrain of dieting by via repertoires of self-discipline and embattlement against fat. Using these discursive tools, men portray dieting as a moral-aesthetic project that bolsters and secures their own hegemonic constructions of masculine status.
In recent decades, American superhero films, and with them often very traditional constructs of masculinity, have become omnipresent in cinemas worldwide. This article examines a specific type of male representation, male fatness, in two examples of the genre, Spiderman: Into the Spider-verse (2018) and Avengers: Endgame (2019). The author argues that in both films the fat male character is depicted as demasculinized, thereby standing in a tradition of male fatness stereotyped as outside of normative masculinity. In the superhero genre the body plays a particularly relevant role in signifying a hegemonic masculinity, which is highlighted by the way the two films position the characters’ fatness, or also behaviors associated with fatness, in contrast to the expectations of superhero masculinity.
Public culture is a powerful source of cognitive socialization; for example, media language is full of meanings about body weight. Yet it remains unclear how individuals process meanings in public culture. We suggest that schema learning is a core mechanism by which public culture becomes personal culture. We propose that a burgeoning approach in computational text analysis – neural word embeddings – can be interpreted as a formal model for cultural learning. Embeddings allow us to empirically model schema learning and activation from natural language data. We illustrate our approach by extracting four lower-order schemas from news articles: the gender, moral, health, and class meanings of body weight. Using these lower-order schemas we quantify how words about body weight “fill in the blanks” about gender, morality, health, and class. Our findings reinforce ongoing concerns that machine-learning models (e.g., of natural language) can encode and reproduce harmful human biases.
Géneros, sexualidades y cuerpos no normativos, aparecen representadas en series de televisión. A este respecto, las teorías crip y queer exponen, de forma crítica, la capacidad corporal obligatoria frente a la discapacidad, y la obligatoriedad heteronormativa frente a multitudes de géneros y sexualidades. Este artículo pretende emplear la perspectiva crip/queer para analizar a tres de los personajes principales en la primera temporada de la serie Euphoria (HBO, 2019), a través de las referencias intertextuales audiovisuales. Y reflexionar si se sigue privilegiando la heteronormatividad patriarcal sin discapacidad o, por el contrario, hay una modificación del discurso para cuestionar la perspectiva dominante. Esta transformación discursiva se produce con la identificación con personajes queer/crip, y mediante un juego intertextual performativo que reinterpreta esas referencias. Ambos aspectos producen un desplazamiento, en unos casos, y una disolución, en otros, del dispositivo activo/pasivo -o sujeto/objeto- para expresar el deseo y las relaciones entre personajes.
This chapter discusses theorizing Chinese femininities and masculinities. There is an ongoing tension within academic feminism between two basic approaches, which are represented as oversimplified extremes. One approach begins with the problem of inequality and then proceeds to critique patriarchy. This inequality-patriarchy approach takes for granted the immutable existence of two biologically differentiated sexes and asks how power is divided between those on opposite sides of the divide. The other approach begins with the issue of difference and then proceeds to focus on constructions of gender. Furthermore, the chapter provides an overview of the study. The study explores questions related to gender while treating gender as more than simply a collection of roles, symbols, and behaviors that are always attached to two incommensurable sexes. It approaches gender as an important organizing principle of an entire worldview. Apart from providing a wealth of interesting detail, it also illustrates the plural nature of femininities and masculinities. Its focus is on the interplay between ideas and practices associated with femininity and masculinity.
Increasing obesity levels are currently big news but do we think carefully enough about what this trend actually means? Everybody - including doctors, parents, teachers, sports clubs, businesses and governments - has a role to play in the 'war on obesity'. But is talk of an obesity 'crisis' justified? Is it the product of measured scientific reasoning or age-old 'habits of mind'? Why is it happening now? And are there potential risks associated with talking about obesity as an 'epidemic'? The Obesity Epidemic proposes that obesity science and the popular media present a complex mix of ambiguous knowledge, familiar (yet unstated) moral agendas and ideological assumptions.