Article

The core attributes of engineering geology: A US perspective

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Our profession operates in a state of identity confusion because we engineering geologists have never engaged as a community in a thorough and profound examination of our profession, to discover and define its core attributes. This paper is a call for such engagement. Acknowledging recent and welcome progress, the theme of this paper nonetheless is that our exploration must be both broader in social context and deeper in introspection if we are to establish a raison d'être for engineering geology that we can all accept and use to nurture its growth in a meaningful way. Engineering geologists understand the interaction between the built environment and the natural geologic environment. That understanding must be communicated to politicians, business leaders, employers, and clients if our profession is to reach its potential for serving the public good. We must become pro-active active in the political environment. To explain the worth of engineering geology to others, we must come to agreement amongst ourselves as to its core attributes and core worth (value) to humankind. The core attributes of Engineering Geology suggested here are: Core Societal Worth (Core Contribution to Humankind; Core Value to Humankind); Core Knowledge; Core Competencies; Core Working Methods; Core Activity (or Core Function); Core Work Products; Core Practice Areas; Core Practice Settings; Core Values (core beliefs or tenets as to the place of engineering geology in society) This paper suggest a raison d'être for engineering geology, its core value to humankind: Engineering geologists benefit humanity by discovering, defining, and analyzing geologically based risks or conditions that affect, or might affect, humans as they utilize and interact with their built and natural environments. This paper further suggests that the core activity of engineering geologists, resulting in a core work product of the same name, is the Engineering Geology Site Characterization.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... In many countries, there are long-standing legal separations that divide engineering and scientific activities. Tepel (2009) provides views on the situation within the USA. Turner (2004; discusses the underlying rationale for the specialization of "geological engineering" in the USA and Canada. ...
... The JTC-3 began its deliberations by reviewing the roles and interactions among geo-engineering specializations. This initial step has been followed by most other individuals or organizations when attempting to assess the educational needs or responsibilities of geoengineers (Higgins & Williams 1991;Manoliu et al. 2000;Manoliu & Radulescu 2008;Bock 2009;JTC4 2009;Tepel 2009). The three principal international professional societies -IAEG, ISRM, and ISSMGEbroadly correspond to the specializations of engineering geology, rock mechanics, and soil mechanics. ...
... For example, some countries favor the term "geotechnical engineer" while others avoid the term. In many countries there are longstanding separations between engineers and scientists; while in others there are cordial and collaborative relationships (bock 2009;Tepel 2009). Geological engineering has developed as a specialty field within the broader engineering professions in the USA and Canada, where it first became established in response to a combination of existing legal and technological conditions (Turner 2004;. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Joint Technical Committee on Education and Training (JTC-3) has begun the process of assessing the professional competency requirements of specializations within geo-engineering by adapting the process established for civil engineering by the ASCE. Competency profiles based on a unified geo-engineering matrix provide a basis for defining the relative roles of the different specializations. They also show how competency can be achieved through Bachelors and Masters degrees, or by Training/Experience. Thus, individuals can use them to evaluate their own competencies and develop education plans. They can also evaluate the relevance of specialist training courses at the post-Masters level, or the professional qualifications of individuals. RÉSUMÉ Le Comité Technique Commun sur Education et l'Entraînement (JTC-3) a commencé le processus d'évaluer les conditions de compétence professionnelles de spécialisations dans la geo-ingénierie en adaptant le processus a établi pour l'ingénierie civile par l'ASCE. Les compétence profiles fondé sur une matrice de geo-ingénierie unifiée fournit une base pour définir les rôles relatifs des spécialisations différentes. Ils montrent aussi comment la compétence peut être atteinte par Célibataires et Maîtrise des degrés, ou par L'Entraînement /Expérience. Ainsi, les individus peuvent les utiliser pour évaluer leurs propres compétences et développer les projets d'éducation. Ils peuvent évaluer aussi la pertinence de cours d'entraînement de spécialiste au niveau de poste-maîtres, ou les qualifications professionnelles d'individus.
... For the last decade, in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States of America (USA) at least, engineering geology has been going through something of an identity crisis, or, as Tepel (2009) put it, the engineering geological profession operates in "a state of identity confusion." This concern resulted in a number of meetings to discuss the future of engineering geology and, indeed, further define its purpose. ...
Article
Full-text available
Urban geology began to develop in the 1950s, particularly in California in relation to land-use planning, and led to Robert Legget publishing his seminal book "Cities and geology" in 1973. Urban geology has now become an important part of engineering geology. Research and practice has seen the evolution from single theme spatial datasets to multi-theme and multi-dimensional outputs for a wide range of users. In parallel to the development of these new outputs to aid urban development, regeneration and conservation, has been the growing recognition that city authorities need access to extensive databases of geo-information that are maintained in the long-term and renewed regularly. A further key advance has been the recognition that, in the urban environment, knowledge and understanding of the geology need to be integrated with those of other environmental topics (for example, biodiversity) and, increasingly, with the research of social scientists, economists and others. Despite these advances, it is suggested that the value of urban geology is not fully recognised by those charged with the management and improvement of the world's cities. This may be because engineering geologists have failed to adequately demonstrate the benefits of urban geological applications in terms of cost and environmental improvement, have not communicated these benefits well enough and have not clearly shown the long-term contribution of geo-information to urban sustainability. Within this context future actions to improve the situation are proposed.
Article
Hard-won development gains are under real threat due to climate change impacts on Rural Transport Infrastructure (RTI) and it is a major challenge, within normally available budgets, to ensure that rural access is made sustainably climate resilient. The ability of engineers and engineering geologists to identify problems and to devise solutions that provide sustainable cost-effective access for the rural poor is a key factor in overarching aims of poverty reduction and socio-economic development in Lower and Middle-Income Countries (LIMCs). Engineering Geology, through its inherent wide-ranging and inclusive approach to earth science, has an important role to play in providing an holistic and cross-sectorial framework to meet this challenge in a sustainable manner. This paper firstly emphasises the importance of RTI, then outlines the climate change risks to RTI and hence to socio-economic development in LIMCs. The paper then describes the key contribution that Engineering Geology can make to combatting this challenge through cost-effective climate strengthening measures aided by the practical application of sound earth science principles in a budget-constrained environment. Illustrative examples are taken from recent and ongoing LIMC projects funded by the UKAID Department of International Development (DFID), the Word Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Kreditanstaltfür Wiederaufbau – the German Development Bank (KfW). Thematic collection: This article is part of the Climate change and resilience in Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/climate-change-and-resilience-in-engineering-geology-and-hydrogeology
Chapter
Engineering geology has no generally acknowledged and formally stated Raison d’Être. This lack could be because engineering geology practice has long been so closely integrated into civil engineering practice that its Raison d’Être appeared to be nothing more than to serve the needs of civil engineers. Today, our scope of services has expanded beyond direct and immediate application to engineered projects. A 21st century Raison d’Être for the profession should match our 21st century practice; it should be derived from a description of the benefits the profession provides to humankind. This study seeks insight into how engineering geology benefits humankind by examining a subset of thirteen of forty-nine codes of ethics under which engineering geologists might practice. All thirteen contain an ethical requirement that stands out as supportive of a Raison d’Être for the profession based on its societal value. This special clause imposes a mandatory duty on the professional to hold paramount the public health, safety, and welfare in all professional work. The connection between this ethical requirement and our 21st century Raison d’Être is revealed by asking the question, how does our practice meet the ethical requirement to protect the public health, safety, and welfare? The proposed answer (Raison d’Être) is that engineering geologists protect the public health, safety, and welfare by finding, defining, and communicating actionable information about, geologically-sourced risks and their associated hazards that can affect the health, safety, and welfare of the public, as they live in and use their natural and built environments.
Article
The competency-oriented approach for evaluating education and training issues defines professionalism and establishes international standards. Over the past decade, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) have assessed professional competency for civil engineering by utilizing recognized terminology used by education professionals to quantify 24 "outcomes" and 6 "levels of achievement" (or "competencies") required for professional recognition. The ASCE process can be readily adapted to represent the geo-engineering field. A geo-engineering competency matrix can be developed to reflect principles and professional standards of the geo-engineering community. Competency profiles can define the relative roles of different specializations and show how competency can be achieved through education or by training/experience. Individuals can use them to evaluate their competencies, develop life-long-learning plans, or evaluate specialist training courses at the post-Masters level. They may also help promote appropriate international professional recognition of geo-engineering.
Article
Engineering geology has a long and rich heritage and the UK has been in the vanguard of the development of the subject as a distinct discipline, with the first book on the subject being published in London in 1880. Since then, engineering geology has been applied to projects around the world and engineering geologists have become core members of planning, investigation, design and construction teams in the civil engineering and mining industries. However, in the past few decades we have seen numerical analyses increasingly being accepted as the answer to all geotechnical design questions, although as engineering geologists we are used to dealing with natural materials and processes and recognize that their inherent variability cannot always be reduced to a simple numerical value. Consequently, how do we ensure that any proposed construction works in civil engineering or mining take full account of this variability and the uncertainties that result? To enable engineering geologists to understand and describe these uncertainties are there fundamental skills that define an engineering geologist and, if so, how can these skills be taught or acquired? Also, in a world dominated by readily accessible data that can be downloaded and analysed for so many planned development sites, how important are the field techniques of observation and mapping that an older generation of engineering geologists, including the author, considered their defining skill? Concentrating on the role of engineering geology in relation to civil engineering, these are amongst the questions explored in this paper, leading to observations as to how the profession might develop in the future in order to meet the needs of society.
Article
In recent years, there has been much debate about what constitutes engineering geology and how it should develop in the future. In the special session on. ‘The Future of Engineering Geology’ at the 10th Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment (IAEG), it was agreed that: engineering geology was now a defined profession with status and recognised roles within the broader field of geo-engineering; continuing and improved education and training is the most important issue for the future; there needs to be a greater involvement in projects relating to environmental change and geohazards; there needs to be better communication with society as a whole about what engineering geologists do and the benefits they produce; there needs to be pro-active stewardship of the profession. As the international society responsible for the promotion of engineering geology, the IAEG must increase the effectiveness of its activities and those of the IAEG national groups. In particular, the IAEG must encourage the continuing development of technical knowledge through its Technical Commissions. In addition, engineering geologists must establish a genuine research agenda for their subject; universities must be willing to appoint practitioners as lecturers who may not have a conventional academic track record; Quaternary geology and geomorphology must be incorporated far more into engineering geology teaching; employers must actively support Masters' degree programmes and research in engineering geology; employers need to set up clear career paths for engineering geologists with an identified programme of continued professional development (CPD).
Article
The traditional scope of engineering geology was the application of geology in construction practice, but this has become widened in time to embrace other fields of engineering, environmental concerns and geological hazards. The subject lies at the interface between the observation and description of natural processes associated with the science of geology and the knowledge of numeracy and material properties required for design and manufacturing central to the engineering process. A consequence is that engineering geology has come to be seen as secondary to soil and rock mechanics within geotechnical engineering, even though the subject is required to be applied throughout the construction sequence and cost over-run, delay and failure during construction are commonly ascribed to geological errors. The role of engineering geology as a discipline needs to be defined and the central role of geology has to be re-emphasised by improving the understanding of geological uncertainty in contributing to geotechnical risk, developing improved protocols in the formulation of meaningful geological and ground models, and more systematic methods of presentation of ground-related reporting. National and international organisations in engineering geology have an important challenge in providing the leadership through which an enhanced function and status for the subject can be attained.
Article
Civil engineering work is worth over €80 billion/year to the UK economy and is an industry that employs over 6000 geotechnical and engineering geological professionals. However, there is concern that a skills shortage is developing in engineering geology due to the lack of academic champions in universities, the reduction in support for specialist masters degrees by research councils, and industry being non-responsive to the financial need to support training and research in the subject. Unless these issues are addressed there will be an increasing risk of civil engineering construction works being built without a full appreciation of the ground conditions, possibly leading to more functional failures, costly over-designs, or increased litigation.
Article
On permanent loan to the Publications Unit. Incl. a biographical note on Noah Webster, 16 October 1758 - 28 May 1843
Visioning the Future of Engineering Geology: Understanding Conflict and Cooperation in the Practice of Engineering Geology, Toward a philosophy of engineering geology
  • R E Tepel
The engineering geology site characterization as the core function of engineering geology practice
  • R E Tepel
Visioning the Future of Engineering Geology: Understanding Conflict and Cooperation in the Practice of Engineering Geology, Confounded confusion: implications and consequences of the great definitional obfuscation between engineering geology and environmental geology
  • R E Tepel
Mission-capable and mission ready? The role of engineering geology professional associations as stewards of, and standard-bearers for, the profession
  • R E Tepel
Core values of engineering geology and the Commission's work, a working plan produced for discussion
  • IAEG Task Force
Engineering geology core values: a UK perspectiveEngineering Geology for Tomorrow's Cities200922277280Geological Society
  • J S Griffiths
  • M G Culshaw
  • H J Reeves
  • I Jefferson
  • T W Spink
  • Griffiths J. S.
The engineering geology site characterization as the core function of engineering geology practiceVisioning the Future of Engineering Geology: Site Characterization2004c19Association of Engineering Geologists (AEG)
  • R E Tepel
  • G L Hempen
  • A W Hatheway
  • Tepel R. E.