... Through time, teacher education has broadened its scope of interest to accommodate the increasingly diverse structural, social, and professional issues. In the U.S., EU and elsewhere, it has embodied such issues as the knowledge base of teachers (for example, see Ben-Peretz, 2011;Shulman, 1987;Verloop;Driel;& Verloop, Driel, & Meijer, 2001); teaching, teacher educators and student learning (Bransford, & Bransford, J, 2005;Day, 2017;Goodwin & Kosnik, 2013;Lee & Day, 2015;Korthagen, 2016;Livingston & Flores, 2017;Loughran, 2006;Lunenberg, Murray, Smith, & Vanderlinde, 2017;Mena, Clarke, & Barkatsos, 2016;Nilsson, 2009); social justice as an essential purpose of teaching and cultivating teachers for inclusive education (Apple, 2011;Cochran-Smith et al., 2009;DeLuca, 2012;Dyches & Boyd, 2017;Florian & Linklater, 2010;Hopkins, Round, & Barley, 2018;Mills & Ballantyne, 2016;Pale, 2019;Zeichner, 2009); the form, process, and site for teacher preparation (for example, Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.), 2000;;Tatto, Burn, Menter, Mutton, & Thompson, 2018;Zeng & Day, 2019) More recently, as quality assurance issuessuch as teacher competence and the effectiveness of teacher education programmeshave received growing attention from policymakers, discussions on teacher certification (Ballou & Podgursky, 1999;Livingston & Flores, 2017;Walsh, 2001) and on the assessment of teachers and programme effectiveness have been revived (Baker et al., 2010;Floden, 2012;Henry et al., 2013). In a different societal context, teacher education in China has also treated curricular and pedagogical issues as its central concern (Chen, 2003;Liu & Xie, 2002;Zhang, 2000). ...