Article

Evidence of capsular defect following hip arthroscopy

Hip Preservation Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Rush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA, .
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (Impact Factor: 3.05). 07/2013; 22(4). DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2591-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of capsular defects in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy.
A radiographic and anatomical analysis of MR arthrograms of patients undergoing revision arthroscopy was performed to assess for the presence of capsular defect. Intra-operative images and findings were reviewed. Patients with persistent cam and pincer lesions were excluded.
From October 2011 to October 2012, 25 patients underwent revision hip arthroscopy surgery, and 9 patients met our inclusion criteria. Within this series, all patients had post-surgical capsular irregularities and seven patients (78 %) had radiographic evidence of capsule and iliofemoral defects on MR arthrogram. Gross capsular defects were confirmed at revision surgery in two patients.
The findings of this study demonstrate post-surgical radiographic and anatomical evidence of capsular defects in a select group of patients following hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Joshua David Harris, Jan 17, 2016
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increase of range of motion and pain reduction for pain limited movement of the hip joint by arthroscopic arthrolysis of the peripheral compartment. Painful primary or secondary restriction of movement of the hip joint with adhesive capsulitis and after previous surgery or additional arthroscopically treatable intra-articular changes. Extensive periarticular ossification, severe arthrofibrosis and advanced arthritis of the hip. Arthroscopy of the peripheral compartment of the hip, initially using a lateral portal for the arthroscope and an anterolateral portal for instruments. After expansion of the portal entry site with a shaver and/or HF applicator and removal of scar tissue between the capsule and femoral neck, the capsule is reduced from anterolateral to anteromedial. After exchange of arthroscope and working portal, the lateral and dorsolateral arthrolysis is done. Administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for prophylaxis of heterotopic ossifications. Thrombosis prophylaxis with heparin. Mobilization with full weight bearing. Intensive physiotherapeutic exercises for at least for 6 weeks and if needed for 12 postoperative weeks. After arthroscopic (n=38) or open (n=11) hip surgeries, 49 revision hip arthroscopies were performed from January 2009 to August 2013. Arthrolysis in the described technique was performed if adhesions were present. In 19 of these cases, a limitation of at least 30 % for one direction of movement was present pre-operatively. The following average values were obtained for the range of motion (preoperative/postoperative/increase): flexion 94A degrees/128A degrees/34 A degrees, abduction 18A degrees/40A degrees/22A degrees, internal rotation of 8A degrees/20A degrees/12A degrees, external rotation 18A degrees/38A degrees/20A degrees.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2014 · Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hip capsular management after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is controversial.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2014 · The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop a novel method to quantify hip capsular volume in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery, utilizing magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) and to determine whether there are demographic or radiological factors that are associated with capsular volume. Methods A retrospective review was performed from 2006 to 2014 of consecutive patients who presented with hip pain and received a hip MRA and plain radiographs. All patients were suspected of soft tissue injury due to underlying femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). A novel technique using Osirix MD for the quantification of capsular and femoral head volumes was described. Results Ninety-seven patients met the study criteria and were included for analysis. The average total capsular volume (including the femoral head) measured 79.89 ± 20.35 cm3, average femoral head volume 46.68 ± 12.32 cm3, and average true capsular volume measured 33.20 ± 12.58 cm3. Average total capsular:femoral head volume ratio was 1.74 ± 0.27. Significant differences were seen between genders for total capsular volume (P < 0.01), femoral head volume (P < 0.01), and true capsular volume (P < 0.01). Total capsular volume:femoral head ratio was greater for females, but was not statistically significant (n.s.). Femoral head volume significantly correlated with alpha angle (P < 0.01), height (P < 0.01), BMI (P < 0.01), BMI (P = 0.02), and age (P < 0.01). Total capsular volume significantly correlated with height (P < 0.01), BMI (P = 0.01), and age (P < 0.01). Age was also correlated with true capsular volume (P = 0.011). No significant differences in capsular volumes were found between normal and abnormal radiographic measurements. Conclusion The current study describes a reproducible radiographic measurement for hip capsule volumes from MRAs. Only gender was predictive of total capsular volume, femoral head volume, and true capsular volume. There were no macroscopic anatomical differences evident on MRA. This method showed good intra- and inter-observer reliability and can aid in future research regarding hip capsule volumes. This novel technique may potentially allow clinicians a readily available and reliable method to detect large and redundant capsules, a possible predisposition for hip micro-instability. Level of evidence Retrospective case series, Level IV.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2014 · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Show more