ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

It is one of the most infamous quotes in the history of biomedicine: "It is time to close the book on infectious diseases, and declare the war against pestilence won." Long attributed to the United States Surgeon General, Dr. William H. Stewart (1965-1969), the statement is frequently used as a foil by scientific and lay authors to underscore the ever-increasing problems of antibiotic-resistant and emerging infections. However, the primary source for the quote has never been identified. We undertook a comprehensive search of multiple databases encompassing medical literature, news articles, and congressional records to attempt to identify sources for the quote. No source of the quote was identified. However, a trail of source documents was identified that clearly serves as the basis for subsequent, incorrect attribution of the quote to Dr. Stewart. In multiple source documents, Dr. Stewart made statements to the opposite effect, clearly recognizing that infectious diseases had not been conquered. The urban legend was created by a combination of lack of primary witnesses to the originating speech, misunderstanding of points made by Dr. Stewart in the speech, and increasing societal concern about emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Attribution to Dr. Stewart of a belief that it was time to close the book on infectious diseases is an urban legend; he never made any such statement. Numerous other verifiable sources, however, confirm that other people in academia adopted this belief. Dr. Stewart should no longer be cited in this regard, and should be replaced with verifiable sources.
RES E A R C H A R T I C L E Open Access
On the exoneration of Dr. William H. Stewart:
debunking an urban legend
Brad Spellberg
1,2*
and Bonnie Taylor-Blake
3
Abstract
Background: It is one of the most infamous quotes in the history of biomedicine: It is time to close the book on
infectious diseases, and declare the war against pestilence won. Long attributed to the United States Surgeon
General, Dr. William H. Stewart (1965-1969), the statement is frequently used as a foil by scientific and lay authors to
underscore the ever-increasing problems of antibiotic-resistant and emerging infections. However, the primary
source for the quote has never been identified.
Methods: We undertook a comprehensive search of multiple databases encompassing medical literature, news
articles, and congressional records to attempt to identify sources for the quote.
Results: No source of the quote was identified. However, a trail of source documents was identified that clear ly
serves as the basis for subsequent, incorrect attribution of the quote to Dr. Stewart. In multiple source documents,
Dr. Stewart made statements to the opposite effect, clearly recognizing that infectious diseases had not been
conquered. The urban legend was created by a combination of lack of primary witnesses to the originating speech,
misunderstanding of points made by Dr. Stewart in the spee ch, and increasing societal concern about emerging
and re-emerging infectious diseases.
Conclusions: Attribution to Dr. Stewart of a belief that it was time to close the book on infectious diseases is an
urban legend; he never made any such statement. Numerous other verifiable sources, howe ver, confirm that other
people in academia adopted this belief. Dr. Stewart should no longer be cited in this regard, and should be
replaced with verifiable sources.
Keywords: William H. Stewart, Urban legend, History of antibiotics, Antibiotic development, Antibiotic crisis,
Public policy
Multilingual abstracts
Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the
abstract into the six official working languages of the
United Nations.
Background
Dr. William H. Stewart (1921-2008) was a distinguished
member of the United States (US) Public Health Services
Corps, having served in the first class of the Epidemic
Intelligence Service officer program at the Communicable
Disease Center (now the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention [CDC]), and subsequently as US Surgeon
General from 1965-1969 [1]. Among his many important
accomplishments were his dogged spearheading of anti-
tobacco campaigns, and his aggressive attempts to end
racial discrimination in health care [2].
Despite these significant achievements, history has
remembered Dr. Stewart primarily for being the source
of a legendary statement: It is time to close the book on
infectious diseases, and declare the war against pesti-
lence won. This spectacularly erroneous quote has been
cited innumerable times to underscore ongoing public
health problems caused by antibiotic-resistant and emer-
ging infections. The quote was referred to in Dr. Stewarts
obituary, published in a leading medical journal in July of
2008 [3]. The persistent relevance of this quote to modern
society is underscored by its citation in a 2009 Wall Street
* Correspondence: bspellberg@labiomed.org
1
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California
at Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
2
The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2013 Spellberg and Taylor-Blake; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Spellberg and Taylor-Blake Infectious Diseases of poverty 2013, 2:3
http://www.idpjournal.com/content/2/1/3
Journal article about the recent H1N1 influenza outbreak
[4], and in an article regarding the deadly shiga-toxin pro-
ducing E. coli 0104:H4 outbreak in Germany and Europe
in 2011 [5].
Despite the ubiquity of its citation, there is no credible
evidence that Dr. Stewart made any such statement. Be-
fore his death, the Office of the Public Health Service
Historian asked Dr. Stewart if he made such a statement
and his response was tha t he could not recall [6]. How-
ever, by following the trail of source documents back
over the past 40 years, we can now reconstruct how the
urban legend of Dr. Stewarts apocryphal statement came
to fruition.
Methods
We searched electronic full-text databases for contem-
poraneous (late 1960s and early 1970s) and more re-
cent attributions of these sentiments to Dr. Stewart.
These databases include ProQuest Historical Newspapers
(complete collection), ProQuest Direct (including ProQuest
Newspapers), LexisNexis Academic, LexisNexis Congres-
sional, JSTOR, Periodicals Archive Online (Periodicals
Contents Index Full Text), Factiva, Google News, Google
Books, and PubMed/Medline. Keywords for all of these
search engines included various combinations of William
[H.] Stewart,”“surgeon general,”“won the war [on infec-
tious disease], and close the book [on infectious disease].
As well, Dr. Stewarts congressional testimony, with
reference to the phrases infectious disease(s),”“close
the book, and won the war, was reviewed through the
use of LexisNexis Congressional for the years 1966 to
1970; congressional testimony of other PHS officials
were similarly scanned for such sentiments.
Results and discussion
After many years of searching [6], only one source has
been identified which contains a primary reference to
Dr. Stewarts quote [7]. The reference is to a speech
given by Dr. Stewart at the 65
th
Annual Meeting of the
Association of State and Territorial Health Officers in
1967 [8]. However, a review of the actual contents of the
speech revealed that it contains nothing even remotely
resembling the alleged quote.To the contrary, Dr. Stewart
actually said in that speech, Warning flags are still flying
in the communicable disease field...While we are engaged
in taking on new duties...we cannot and must not lose
sight of our traditional program responsibilities [emphasis
added]. Hence, it is clear that as of 1967, Dr. Stewart was
in no mood to signal the end of infectious diseases as a
public health problem.
Despite an exhaustive search of multiple sources, no
other primary source for Dr. Stewarts infamous quote
was identified. However, sources were identified that
allow us to reconstruct the origins of the urban legend
surrounding the quote.
The seeds of an urban legend
In the aftermath of the astonishing power of antibiotics,
by the 1960s the US Public Health Service was shifting
its attention away from acute infections to chronic
illnesses. For example, a government report published in
1968, which bears Dr. Stewarts name on the title page,
contained the following passage:
The emphasis of epidemiologic investigation has
shifted markedly in the last two decades. A decline in
the interest in the infectious diseases and increase in
concern with the noninfectious diseases has resulted
from the change in relative importance of these
categories of disease in many parts of the world,
including the United States. It is also recognized that,
although major tasks still remain in the improvement
of control over the infectious diseases [emphasis
added]...the identification of cigarette smoking as the
major cause of this centurys epidemic of lung
cancer...[and] chronic diseases.. .now constitute the
predominant health problems in this country [9].
In July of 1971, the New York Times ran an in depth
commentary on a subsequent, related government report
by the national Health Education Committ ee [10]. The
reporter wrote:
American medical science has made spectacular
advances in the last quarter-century, but
improvements in the over-all American death rate
and the infant and maternal mortality rate have
leveled off...In general, Americans are almost
certainly healthier and far less prey to disease than
they were a few decades ago. The dread infections
that used to rage through the whole communities are
muted...Their retreat has been rapid since the advent
of antibiotics and new vaccines after World War
II...In fact, the over-all American death rate declined
steadily from 1900 to about 1950. About then the
improvement slowed to a virtual halt for reasons that
are still obscure.
This failure to experience a decline in mortality rates
in the United States since about 1950 is little known,
unexpected and extremely important, according to
Dr. William H. Stewart, former Surgeon General of the
Public Health Service. He blames two factors for this
new trend.
The first of these is the success of the last few decades
in treating infectious disease. The degree of success
Spellberg and Taylor-Blake Infectious Diseases of poverty 2013, 2:3 Page 2 of 5
http://www.idpjournal.com/content/2/1/3
was so marked and so rapid, he believes that there
simply has not been room for enough further
improvement to make dramatic changes in mortality.
The se cond factor, he says, was the emergence of
chronic diseases and accidents as the great
undertone of mortality today. These causes of death
are certainly not new, but their impact was less when
so many died of acute infections.
Thus, due to: 1) the inability to further reduce mortality
from infections in the aftermath of antibiotic availability;
and 2) the rise of chronic illnesses as a cause of mortality,
which was in large part caused by the fact that people were
no longer dying at a young age of infections, Dr. Stewart
and the US Public Health Service made a conscious de-
cision to focus more on chronic illnesses and less on in-
fectious diseases. Such a decision was not only rational, it
wouldhavebeenirresponsiblenottopursueachangeof
focus in the context of the above factors. Nevertheless, the
decision did not reflect a belief that infectious diseases had
been conquered and were now irrelevant.
Within two decades, and with no published attributions
in the interim, misperceptions of Dr. Stewarts view of
infections had already achieved the status of urban legend.
In May of 1989, the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) sponsored the Conference on Emerging
Viruses in Washington D.C. A medical correspondent for
the New York Times covered the meeting and wrote:
The public has been generally complacent about
[infectious] diseases since the development of
antibiotics and certain vaccines after World War II. One
example of this cited at the meeting was a 1969 speech
by the Surgeon General, Dr. William H. Stewart, who
assured an audience that scientists had probed most
frontiers of knowledge about infectious diseases. Such
attitudes, the scientists said, helped reduce the number
of American researchers working on infectious diseases.
Not surprisingly, the participants at the [NIAID/NIH
conference] deplored this complacency [11].
This reference in the New York Times is the first
published instance we were able to identify by any of the
used search engines which links Dr. Stewart to a belief
that infectious diseases were no longer a compelling
problem for society. No such references were identified
before 1989 in any format.
A second report regarding the same NIAID conference
was published in Newsd ay in the same month (May
1989). The article began with the following sentence.
Surgeon General William H. Stewart told Congress in
1969 that it was time to "close the book on infectious
diseases," to declare the war against pestilence won and
to shift national resources to such chronic disease
problems as cancer and heart disease [12]. The use of
quotation marks represents the first direct attribution to
Dr. Stewart of those precise words. Thus the origin of
this quote can be traced directly to the 1989 conference,
which Dr. Stewart did not attend. So, what was the
source for the quote at the 1989 conference?
Subsequently, a text book chapter, written by one of
the Conference organizers, provides the first actual cit-
ation to the alleged 1969 speech by Dr. Stewart: The
striking successes achieved with antibiotics, togethe r
with widespread application of vaccines...made many
physicians and the public believe that infectious diseases
were retreating and would in time be fully conquered...it
had become commonplace to suggest that infectious
diseases were about to become a thing of the past and that
chronic, noninfectious diseases should be our major prior-
ities [13]. The footnote source for the statement in the
text book is a personal communication to the chapter au-
thor regarding a speech given by the William Stewart
as Surgeon General at Johns Hopkins University in
1969, in which he assured his audience that infectious
diseases were now of marginal interest in the United
States and that we should shift our focus of attention to
the chronic diseases [14]. The originator of the personal
communication was not present when Dr. Stewart gave
the speech, but had heard about the contents of the
speech from unspecified people who remembered the
speech, which had apparently occurred during the dedica-
tion of a new building at Johns Hopkins University.
After discovering this footnoted personal communication,
we requested the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Alan
Mason Chesney Medical Archives to search for records of
speeches given by Dr. Stewart at Johns Hopkins in the
late 1960s. No such speech was identified in 1969. How-
ever, the Archives indeed identified a speech given by
Dr. Stewart as part of the dedication of the Ernest Lyman
Stebbins Building at the Johns Hopkins University School
of Hygiene and Public Health on September 18, 1968 [15].
We have reviewed the content of the 1968 speech. Dr.
Stewart made no statement even remotely implying the
end of infections as a serious threat to public health. How-
ever, he did make statements which are clearly the seeds
from which sprang the urban legend that had matured to
full form by the 1989 NIAID/NIH conference:
Powerful tools have been developed to characterize
these diseases in man and in societythe tools of
microbiology, epidemiology, and biostatistics...means
for preventing or alleviating disease in an individual or
en masse have been developed and applied...and never
before in man's history has a society reached such a
peak of health...
Spellberg and Taylor-Blake Infectious Diseases of poverty 2013, 2:3 Page 3 of 5
http://www.idpjournal.com/content/2/1/3
This success story brings us to the here and now. And
largely as a result of this success story, times have
changed. The purpose of our effortsthe preservation
and improvement of healthcan no longer be
measured on the scale of microbiology. Our
exploitation of that science has just about caught up
with the frontiers of public need. Clearly we cannot
turn our backs on microbiologycertain notable gaps
remain in our knowledge and capability, and
maintenance of a vigilant effort will always be
required [emphasis added].
But just as clearly the characterization of health in terms
of microbiology and infectious disease epidemiology
cannot serve as the base for our future endeavors. Rather,
the moving tides of society, which we have helped to
move, are compelling us to redefine our purposes in
quite different termsthe terms of man's adaptation to
his total environment.
Immediately we find ourselves on dark and shaky
ground. This new definition of purpose rests on
sciences much less comfortably exact than
microbiology. We find the familiar equations of one
causeone disease disappearing into a complex of
multiple causation [15].
These statements indicate that Dr. Stewart was in full
grasp of the critical concepts of public health in the late
1960s. He recognized that more complex scientific tools
would be necessary to reduce mortality from multi-
factorial chronic illne sses than for infections. At the
same time, Dr. Stewart unequivocally recognized that
infections would always remain an important problem,
and that maintenance of a vigilan t effort [against
infections] will always be required.
The urban legend becomes ingrained
Two years after the 1989 NIAID conference, the origins
of the quote were reinforced by a different journalist in
Business Week:
In 1969, buoyed by the defeat of smallpox, polio,
and other infectious ills over the pre vious two
decades , Surgeon General William H. Stewart
declared that science had won the war on
microbes. Medicine, he said, should turn to fighting
chronic ailments such as cancer and heart dise a se.
It did: From 1970 to 1975, as the budget for the
National Institutes of Hea lth more than doubled,
funding for infectious disease research grew by just
20% [16].
Again, no citation is provided for the quotation, but
given the similarity to the New York Times and Newsday
articles from 2 years earlier, it is highly likely that they
served as the source for the Business Week article.
By the following year, the amalgamation of Dr. Stewart
with the end of infections as a public health threat was
completed when the following statement appeared in a
book chapter written by the same jou rnalist as the
author of the 1989 Newsday article:
In the 1960s, the world mounted a campaign against
smallpox, eliminating the disease from the planet. With
victory in sight, Surgeon General William H. Stewart
told the U.S. Congress that it was time to "close the
book on infectious diseases," declare the war against
pestilence won, and shift national resources to such
chronic problems as cancer and heart disease [17].
Once again, the statement has no footnoted source in
the book. An extensive review of congressional records
has failed to identify any speech that Dr. Stewart gave to
Congress during his stint as Surgeon General in which
he claimed the end of infectious diseases had been
achieved. Attribution of such a statement to him appears
to reflect an erroneous conflation of concepts that
Dr. Stewart appropriately discussed in his speech at
Johns Hopkins University in 1968.
Subsequently, the attribution of the quotation to
Dr. Stewart was burned into the consciousness of the
scientific and lay communities by the same author, who
wrote in a subsequent best-selling book published in 1994
that:
By 1967 U.S. Surgeon General William H. Stewart
would be so utterly convinced of imminent success
that he would tell a White House gathering of state
and territorial health officers that it was time to close
the book on infectious diseases and shift all national
attention (and dollars) to what he termed "the New
Dimensions" of health: chronic diseases [9]. [7]
Note that in this follow up attribution, the same
author has chan ged the date of the quote from 1969 to
1967, has removed the quotation marks likely reflecting
an inabil ity to identify a primary source for the state-
ment, and has changed the venue from Congress to the
meeting of the Association of State and Territorial
Health Officers meeting, which is what reference #9
refers to in that book. Of course, as we have discussed
above, Dr. Stewart made no such statement during that
speech in 1967, the text of which is extant [8].
Conclusion
We can therefore conclude that Dr. Stewart never
promulgated the concept that infectious diseases wa s a
dying field of research and medicine. The urban legend
Spellberg and Taylor-Blake Infectious Diseases of poverty 2013, 2:3 Page 4 of 5
http://www.idpjournal.com/content/2/1/3
around his apocryphal quote resulted from initial
second-hand, oral referencing of statements he made
more than two decades earlier, with no successful identifi-
cation of the transcript of the originating speech. Subse-
quent citations built upon and further inflated the initial
misunderstanding of the speech. That they did so is
understandable, since numerous verifiable sources con-
firm that the belief that infe ctious diseases had been
successfully overcome was pervasive in biomedical
circle sincluding among a Nobel Laureate, medical
Dean, and other thought leadersfrom as early as
1948, and extending all the way i nto the mid-1980s
[18-24]. Attribution of the infamous quote reflects
collateral damage to Dr. Stewart originating from con-
flation of the legitimate points he made, which became
subsumed within the broader incorrect belief by the med-
ical community at large that infectious diseases had been
conquered. Ultimately, a string of oral communications
without source documentation, followed by publication
with an incorrect citation, gave rise to the full blown
urban legend.
Dr. Stewart should no longer be cited as a source of the
belief that infections had been conquered by modern
medicine. Nor is there need to cite him in this context, be-
cause the point legitimately can continue to be made that
the medical community at large believed that infectious
diseases had been conquered, as evidenced by numerous
other verifiable and compelling references [18-24].
Additional file
Additional file 1: Multilingual abstracts in the six official working
languages of the United Nations.
Competing interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Authors contributions
BS and BTB both conceived of and drafted the manuscript. BTB conducted
the primary search for the source of the quote. Both authors read and
approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Andrew Harrison, Material Culture Archivist
at the Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives of the Johns Hopkins Medical
Institutions for identifying Dr. Stewarts 1968 speech, and Dr. John
Parascandola, formerly Historian for the Public Health Service, for helpful
discussion.
Author details
1
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California
at Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
2
The David Geffen
School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
3
University of North
Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Received: 10 December 2012 Accepted: 31 January 2013
Published: 18 February 2013
References
1. Office of the Surgeon General: William H. Stewart (1965-1969). Available:
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/about/previous/biostewart.htm.
2. Schudel M: Obituaries. William H. Stewart; Surgeon General Condemned
Smoking. 2009. Available: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/
article/2008/04/26/AR2008042602246.html.
3. Bristol N: Obituary: William H. Stewart. Lancet 2008, 372:110.
4. Brillian L: The Age of Pandemics. 2009. Available: http://online.wsj.com/
article/SB124121965740478983.html#articleTabs%3Darticle.
5. Muniesa M, Hammerl JA, Hertwig S, Appel B, Brussow H: Shiga toxin-
producing Escherichia coli O104:H4: a new challenge for microbiology.
Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78:406573.
6. Spellberg B: William H. Stewart, MD: Mistaken or Maligned? Clin Infect Dis
2008, 47:294.
7. Garret L: In The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of
Balanceed. New York: Penguin; 1994:33.
8. Stewart WH: "A Mandate for State Action," in Proceedings of the 65th Annual
Meeting of the Association of. Washington D.C.: State and Territorial Health
Officers; 1967.
9. Use of Vital and Health Records in Epidemiologic Research: A Report of the
United States National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. DHEW
Publication No. (HSM) 73-1265; PHS Publication No. 1000-Series 4-No. 7,
March, 1968. Page 2. 1968, April 28, 2009. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/
nchs/data/series/sr_04/sr04_007.pdf.
10. Shmeck H: Health of Nation Lags Behind Scientific Gains. 1971. April 28, 2009.
Available: http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?
res=F00810FC3D591A7493C4A8178CD85F458785F9.
11. Altman LK: The Doctor's World; Fearful of Outbreaks, Doctors Pay New Heed
To Emerging Viruses. 1989. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/09/
science/the-doctor-s-world-fearful-of-outbreaks-doctors-pay-new-heed-to-
emerging-viruses.html.
12. Garrett L: (May 30, 1989) Emerging Viruses, Growing Concerns Outbreaks
of new diseases and the mutation of others, some scientists say, signal
that viruses are drawing new strength from the changing ecology of the
planet, increasing the threat of epidemics. NewsdayDiscovery Section. 1.
13. Morse S: AIDS and Beyond: Defining the Rules for Viral Traffic.InAIDS:
The Making of a Chronic Diseaseed. Edited by Fee F. Berkeley: University of
California Press; 1992:23.
14. Morse S: AIDS and Beyond: Defining the Rules for Viral Traffic.InAIDS:
The Making of a Chronic Diseaseed. Edited by Fee F. Berkeley: University of
California Press; 1992:41.
15. Stewart WH: "Areas of challenge for the future,".InSymposium. Schools of
Public Health: Changing Institutions in a Changing World. Three Papers
Presented on the Occasion of the Dedication of the Ernest Lyman Stebbins
Building. Baltimore. The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and
Public Health, Johns Hopkins University; 1968.
16. Freundlich N: The Microbes Are Back--with a Vengeance. 1991. Available:
http://www.businessweek.com/archives/1991/b319658.arc.htm.
17. Garrett L, Mann JM, Tarantola D, Netter TW: Chapter 18: The Next
Epidemic.InAIDS in the Worlded. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;
1992:825.
18. Pier GB:
On the greatly exaggerated reports of the death of infectious
diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 47:11134.
19. Burnet M: Viruses. Sci Am 1951, 184:51.
20. Burnet M: Natural history of infectious disease. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press; 1962.
21. Petersdorf RG: The doctors' dilemma. N Engl J Med 1978, 299:62834.
22. Petersdorf RG: Whither infectious diseases? Memories, manpower, and
money. J Infect Dis 1986, 153:18995.
23. Fauci AS: Infectious diseases: considerations for the 21st century.
Clin Infect Dis 2001, 32:67585.
24. Johnson AS: Annual Oration: Medicine's Responsibility in the Propagation
of Poor Protoplasm. N Engl J Med 1948, 238:755758.
doi:10.1186/2049-9957-2-3
Cite this article as: Spellberg and Taylor-Blake: On the exoneration of Dr.
William H. Stewart: debunking an urban legend. Infectious Diseases of
poverty 2013 2:3.
Spellberg and Taylor-Blake Infectious Diseases of poverty 2013, 2:3 Page 5 of 5
http://www.idpjournal.com/content/2/1/3
... When antibiotics were first introduced in 1900, it was thought that the war against microorganisms would soon be over and so was proclaimed [1]. But it was rapidly discovered that microorganisms could develop resistance to any of the antimicrobials used to combat them. ...
... Progress in fighting poverty, in medicine and in biomedical sciences, in the access to healthcare, increasing vaccination coverage and improved sanitation, have significantly reduced mortality and morbidity related to infectious diseases, leading to a climate of optimism in the second half of the last century that these diseases were practically under control, and attention should focus on noncommunicable diseases [1]. ...
Article
Full-text available
•Multidimensionality of AMR determination argues in favour of considering it a glocal syndemic.•Lack of attention to syndemic nature of AMR limits the effectiveness of measures taken so far.•The syndemic approach provides policy makers with conceptual tools to design effective responses.
... Interestingly, Stewart never said this phrase (9). However, the fact that it spread so quickly and widely, is an indirect proof of the consolidated confidence of the scientific community in the possibility that infectious diseases could become a thing of the past. ...
Article
Full-text available
The history of the conceptions of evolution of virulence is well known. However, in this period following the Covid-19 pandemic, it may be useful to recap such a current topic. In the public debate, it has often been heard that the Covid-19 was destined to evolve into a less virulent form, because it would be in the virus’s interest to coexist with the human population. This concept can be defined as the “Myth of the good pathogen” and originated from Smith’s “law of declining virulence”. The successes achieved thanks to vaccinations and antibiotics led the medical community, between the 1940s and 1970s, to argue that the battle against infectious diseases had been won. However, the AIDS pandemic brought back down to earth the scientific community in their speculations about plagues. Since 1970s, biologists have advanced the “virulence transmission trade-offs theory”, a new model according to which intermediate virulence maximizes pathogenicity as a result of a trade-off between virulence and transmission. The introduction of trade-off models represented a crucial change that replaced the binary logic according to which natural selection shaped adaptations, while maladaptation escaped selection. This change was fundamental for the introduction of a new perspective in medicine, namely Evolutionary Medicine, which might be an essential tool not only for understanding the dynamics of epidemics, but also for preventing and curing infectious diseases.
... Despite these challenges, successes in the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections have transformed society. Such triumphs ultimately compelled an incautious statement from the 1960s, "It is time to close the book on infectious diseases, and declare the war against pestilence won." [8] Even before widespread recognition of drug resistance and the rise of new challenges put the lie to such hubris, the overuse of anti-bacterial agents had undermined their longevity and usefulness. Thus far, new antibiotics have been fated to inevitable obsolescence by resistant pathogens. ...
Article
Full-text available
The challenge of antimicrobial resistance is broadly appreciated by the clinical and scientific communities. To assess progress in the development of medical countermeasures to combat bacterial infections, we deployed information gleaned from clinical trials conducted from 2000 to 2021. Whereas private sector interest in cancer grew dramatically over this period, activity to combat bacterial infections remained stagnant. The comparative ambivalence to antimicrobial resistance is reflected in the number of investigative drugs under clinical investigation, their stage of development and most troublingly, a declining number of organizations that are actively involved in the development of new products to treat bacterial infections. This drop reflects the exits of many companies that had previously developed antibacterial agents.
... However, paradoxically, the very successes that led to the availability of life-saving antibiotics and vaccines may have decreased interest in the specialty. This is highlighted by one of the most infamous quotes in the history of biomedicine: "It is time to close the book on infectious diseases and declare the war against pestilence won," which was falsely attributed to Dr. William H. Stewart, United States (US) Surgeon General from 1965 to 1969 [1]. Nonetheless, since any physician can prescribe or select antibiotics without specific training, it reinforces the view that ID expertise is not essential, which appears to be held in some circles of modern medicine. ...
Article
The percentage of infectious diseases (ID) fellowship positions filled has declined in the last years despite a relatively stable number of applicants. The data are concerning since this could impact an already strained workforce. A recent survey of ID fellowship program directors provides insight into the perceptions of program directors about factors that might have affected the match rate in 2023 and could also be applicable to the recent 2024 match. Here, we discuss the results of this survey and discuss the complex factors that might influence the choice of ID as an specialty. Although concerning, recent fellowship match results provide new opportunities to reassess current models of ID training and design innovative strategies for ID fellowship and education.
... Hence, a general opinion was generated among citizens and policymakers that infectious diseases would not produce significant problem in the future. But to everyone's surprise, in the last few decades the historical statement, made by the surgeon-general William H. Stewart in the US Congress (1969) "It is time to close the book on infectious diseases", has not only been reversed but left least possibility of the closure of the said book [24]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: 4(3H)-quinazolinone rings have been reported to possess different biological activities such as antibacterial, antifungal, antitubercular, antiviral, anticancer. These activities also include antihypertensive, diuretic, antimicrobial, pesticidal, anticonvulsant, anaesthetic and sedative activities, anti-malarial, and anti-diabetic. Methods/Experimental: The compound, 3-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro1H-quinazolin-4-one (3) was synthesized by dissolving Methyl anthranilate and N-(3- methoxyphenyl)-methyl dithiocarbamic acid in ethanol and anhydrous potassium carbonate and refluxed for 23 h and re-precipitated by treating with dilute hydrochloric. When tested for their in vitro analgesic activity using acetic acid induced induced writhing in mice, the compounds had Analgesic activity. Result: The compounds exhibited significant analgesic activity in the range of 74.67 - 83.80% in comparison to control. Conclusions: From our findings, the compounds synthesized have higher analgesic activities as compared to the standard analgesic drug.
... Hence, a general opinion was generated among citizens and policymakers that infectious diseases would not produce significant problem in the future. But to everyone's surprise, in the last few decades the historical statement, made by the surgeon-general William H. Stewart in the US Congress (1969) "It is time to close the book on infectious diseases", has not only been reversed but left least possibility of the closure of the said book [24]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Heterocyclic compounds have already provided a platform for the rapid swap of research in the areas of organic, pharmaceutical, analytical, and medicinal chemistry. In the pharmaceutical industry, among the top two hundred branded drugs, more than 75% have heterocyclic fragments in their structures. Methods/Experimental: The compound, 3-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro1H-quinazolin-4-one (3) was synthesized by dissolving Methyl anthranilate and N-(3- methoxyphenyl)-methyl dithiocarbamic acid in ethanol and anhydrous potassium carbonate and refluxed for 23 h and re-precipitated by treating with dilute hydrochloric. The 3-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro-1Hquinazolin-4-one was dissolved in 40 mL of 2% alcoholic sodium hydroxide solution and dimethyl sulphate was added drop wise with stirring for 1 h, the reaction mixture was then poured into ice water to get 3-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-methylsulfanyl-3Hquinazolin-4-one (4). The synthesized compounds were screened against various strains of microorganism; Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus species, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Enterococcus Feacalis, Pseudomonas aeriginosa, and candida albicans. Compounds 3 and 4 showed significant activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus species, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Enterococcus Feacalis, Pseudomonas aeriginosa, and candida albicans, MIC ranging from 6 – 12 mg/mL. Result: The compounds exhibited significant antibacterial activity in comparison to control. Conclusions: From our findings, the compounds synthesized have higher antibacterial activities as compared to the standard antibacterial drug.
Article
Full-text available
Lyssaviruses are RNA viruses in the Family Rhabdoviridae, Genus Lyssavirus. They represent the causative agents of acute, progressive encephalitis, known historically as rabies. Regardless of specific etiology, their collective viral morphology, biochemistry, pathobiology, associated clinical signs, diagnosis, epizootiology, and management are essentially the same. Despite centuries of clinical recognition, these quintessential neurotropic agents remain significant pathogens today, with substantive consequences to agriculture, public health, and conservation biology. Notably, the singular morbidity caused by lyssaviruses is incurable and constitutes the highest case fatality of any viral disease. All warm-blooded vertebrates are believed to be susceptible. The dog is the only domestic animal that serves as a reservoir, vector, and victim. In contrast, felids are effective vectors, but not reservoirs. All other rabid domestic species, such as livestock, constitute spillover infections, as a bellwether to local lyssavirus activity. Frequently, professional confusion abounds among the veterinary community, because although the viral species Lyssavirus rabies is inarguably the best-known representative in the Genus, at least 20 other recognized or putative members of this monophyletic group are known. Frequently, this is simply overlooked. Moreover, often the ‘taxonomic etiology’ (i.e., ‘Lyssavirus x’) is mistakenly referenced in a biopolitcal context, instead of the obvious clinical illness (i.e., ‘rabies’). Global consternation persists, if localities believe they are ‘disease-free’, when documented lyssaviruses circulate or laboratory-based surveillance is inadequate to support such claims. Understandably, professional chagrin develops when individuals mistake the epidemiological terminology of control, prevention, elimination, etc. Management is not simple, given that the only licensed veterinary and human vaccines are against rabies virus, sensu lato. There are no adequate antiviral drugs for any lyssaviruses or cross-reactive biologics developed against more distantly related viral members. While representative taxa among the mammalian Orders Chiroptera, Carnivora, and Primates exemplify the major global reservoirs, which mammalian species are responsible for the perpetuation of other lyssaviruses remains a seemingly academic curiosity. This zoonosis is neglected. Clearly, with such underlying characteristics as a fundamental ‘disease of nature’, rabies, unlike smallpox and rinderpest, is not a candidate for eradication. With the worldwide zeal to drive human fatalities from canine rabies viruses to zero by the rapidly approaching year 2030, enhanced surveillance and greater introspection of the poorly appreciated burden posed by rabies virus and diverse other lyssaviruses may manifest as an epidemiological luxury to the overall global program of the future.
Article
The period of scientific research on infectious diseases coincides quite closely with the publication period of the Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (DMW), which was founded in 1875. In the following article, we take a look at the history of infectious diseases in Germany over the past 150 years, using some striking examples.
Article
In times of a pandemic, the world lives in the throes of colossal economic and public health crises. The world seems unprepared and ill-equipped to cater to the catastrophic pandemic of COVID-19. The apocalyptic infectious diseases keep revisiting to expose the global widening economic and health inequalities. This review in its different sections argues that with the "financialization of everything," a new consciousness comprising a more general heightened sense of awareness and interest in personal health and well-being pervades whereby citizens become customers. This effectively forefends the dynamics of interaction between the individual and her/his environment with its consequent impact on health and promotes an individuated risk and responsibility. Even in times of a pandemic, draconian state surveillance, lockdown, behavior modification, self-help, and self-care have emerged as guiding principles of public health. There is an urgent need for a radical reordering of the world order beyond the hegemonic, neoliberal, capitalistic ethos of rabid consumerism and unconstrained private profit.
Chapter
As societies become more complex and interconnected, the global risk for catastrophic disasters is increasing. Demand for expertise to mitigate the human suffering and damage these events cause is also high. A new field of disaster medicine is emerging, offering innovative approaches to optimize disaster management. Much of the information needed to create the foundation for this growing specialty is not objectively described or is scattered among multiple different sources. This definitive work brings together a coherent and comprehensive collection of scientific observations and evidence-based recommendations with expert contributors from around the globe. This book identifies essential subject matter, clarifies nomenclature, and outlines necessary areas of proficiency for healthcare professionals handling mass casualty crises. It also describes in-depth strategies for the rapid diagnosis and treatment of victims suffering from blast injuries or exposure to chemical, biological, and radiological agents.
Article
Full-text available
Editor’s note: Physicians first noted the presence of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) more than 160 years ago, yet it took clinicians until 2001 to codify a standard test to measure cognitive function. We now know that cognitive impairment occurs in up to 65 percent of people with MS and usually lessens their ability to remember previously learned information. So far, trials of drugs formulated to treat cognitive impairment have failed, but the authors remain optimistic that new approaches to diagnosis and drug development could lead to effective therapies in the future.
Article
Full-text available
In 2011, Germany experienced the largest outbreak with a Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strain ever recorded. A series of environmental and trace-back and trace-forward investigations linked sprout consumption with the disease, but fecal-oral transmission was also documented. The genome sequences of the pathogen revealed a clonal outbreak with enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC). Some EAEC virulence factors are carried on the virulence plasmid pAA. From an unknown source, the epidemic strains acquired a lambdoid prophage carrying the gene for the Shiga toxin. The resulting strains therefore possess two different mobile elements, a phage and a plasmid, contributing essential virulence genes. Shiga toxin is released by decaying bacteria in the gut, migrates through the intestinal barrier, and is transported via the blood to target organs, like the kidney. In a mouse model, probiotic bifidobacteria interfered with transport of the toxin through the gut mucosa. Researchers explored bacteriophages, bacteriocins, and low-molecular-weight inhibitors against STEC. Randomized controlled clinical trials of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC)-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) patients found none of the interventions superior to supportive therapy alone. Antibodies against one subtype of Shiga toxin protected pigs against fatal neurological infection, while treatment with a toxin receptor decoy showed no effect in a clinical trial. Likewise, a monoclonal antibody directed against a complement protein led to mixed results. Plasma exchange and IgG immunoadsoprtion ameliorated the condition in small uncontrolled trials. The epidemic O104:H4 strains were resistant to all penicillins and cephalosporins but susceptible to carbapenems, which were recommended for treatment.
Article
The threat of deadly new viruses is on the rise due to population growth, climate change and increased contact between humans and animals. What the world needs to do to prepare. In 1967, the country's surgeon general, William Stewart, famously said, "The time has come to close the book on infectious diseases. We have basically wiped out infection in the United States." This premature victory declaration, perhaps based on early public health victories over 19th-century infectious diseases, has entered the lore of epidemiologists who know that, if anything, the time has come to open the book to a new and dangerous chapter on 21st-century communicable diseases. Indeed, to the epidemiological community, the Influenza Pandemic of 2009 is one of the most widely anticipated diseases in history. Epidemiologists have been shouting from rooftops that a pandemic (or, a world-wide epidemic) of influenza is overdue, and that it is not a matter of "if" but "when." The current pathogen creating the threat is actually a mixture of viral genetic elements from all over the globe that have sorted, shifted, sorted, shifted, drifted and recombined to form this worrisome virus. No one knows if the 2009 swine flu will behave like the 1918 Spanish flu that killed 50 million to 100 million world-wide, or like the 1957 Asian flu and 1968 Hong Kong flu that killed far fewer. This 2009 flu may weaken and lose its virulence, or strengthen and gain virulence — we just do not know.