Article

Schooling cultures: Institutionalizing heteronormativity and heterosexism

Taylor & Francis
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This paper explores how some schooling cultures in New South Wales (hereafter NSW), Australia, police and silence non‐heterosexuality through a number of institutional processes which enable homophobia and heterosexism to flourish, while normalizing and constituting heterosexuality as the dominant and only valid sexuality. The discussion shows that despite an apparent broader societal ‘tolerance’ for non‐heterosexuality, as well as legislation that condemns anti‐‘homosexual’ discrimination in education in NSW, homophobic prejudice — often in the form of silence, omission and assumption — prevails. It illustrates that schools need to be much more aware and proactive in addressing issues pertaining to this social justice issue to ensure a safe and equitable learning and teaching environment for all members of the school community. There is not one but many silences, and they are an integral part of the strategies that underlie and permeate discourses. (Foucault, 197816. Foucault , M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction, Edited by: Hurley , R. New York, NY: Vintage. View all references, p. 27) Lying is done with words, and also with silence. (Rich, 198036. Rich , A. 1980/84. On lies, secrets and silence. Selected prose 1966–1978, London: Virago. View all references/84, p.186)

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Rather, queer visibility is deliberately monitored and censored by the university, including in the areas of teaching and research ("Teachers seem to avoid addressing queer topics in their teaching and research to avoid controversy or pressure from universities"), student media ("They deleted an article about a student doing queer activism"), student management ("The university disciplined a lesbian couple for proposing in public"), and student group administration ("Universities don't allow or support groups for queer students"). These manifestations of heteronormativity at the institutional level echo existing research that has documented institutional heteronormativity in various aspects of campus life, including teaching (Carpenter and Lee 2010;Cui 2023d;Ferfolja 2007;McNeill 2013;R�Thing 2008), academic research (Cui 2023a(Cui , 2024, and student management (Song 2021b). This body of literature demonstrates that heteronormativity is actively maintained and reinforced by the institutional practices of educational providers, constituting a "hidden curriculum" (Carpenter and Lee 2010) for students. ...
... the assumption that heterosexual people do not or should not care about queer issues ("Some heterosexuals think if you care about queer topics, you must be queer"), and people's queerphobic attitudes or prejudices toward queer people ("They don't treat queer people equally"; "My best friend doesn't know because I don't think she can accept it"). These manifestations of heteronormativity at the interpersonal level extend existing research that has documented heteronormativity and queerphobia in interpersonal interactions in educational contexts, such as heteronormative or queerphobic language use, prejudice and bullying (Allen 2019;Cech and Waidzunas 2011;Cui 2022;Cui and Song 2024;Ferfolja 2007;Msibi 2012;Okanlawon 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Drawing on in-depth interviews with 17 participants, this study explores the experiences of Chinese queer university students in managing their queer identity on campus. A range of strategies is outlined, including passing, covering, being implicitly out, and being explicitly out. This study also presents participants' expectations regarding institutional support, as well as their ambivalence toward it. While participants expressed various expectations of university support, they simultaneously considered institutional support difficult or impossible due to the campus climate and broader political context. Informed by queer theory and the concept of heteronormativ-ity, this paper engages in a queer critique of Chinese higher education, examining the manifestations of heteronormativity at both institutional and interpersonal levels. Situated within the context of Xi Jinping's presidency, which has reinforced political control over higher education in China, this study examines the impact of intensified authoritarianism on the campus experiences of queer university students. In this challenging environment, the study highlights a unique facet of contemporary China, providing empirical insights into the power dynamics among queer individuals, educational institutions, and the party-state.
... Instead, non-normative presentations of gender or sexual identity can be deemed unprofessional or even a risk (Connell, 2015). In addition, the categories LGB and childhood can be discursively positioned as in conflict, with sexual diversity being framed as a threat to childhood innocence (Epstein and Johnson, 1998;Ferfolja, 2007Ferfolja, , 2014DePalma, 2010;Monk, 2011;Connell, 2015;Llewellyn, 2022a). Rather than innate social and physical vulnerabilities of children, childhood innocence here is a "moral rhetoric" (Meyer, 2007)-a method of legitimizing "anything without actually having to explain it" (98). ...
... However, within the LGB teacher identify literature it is also understood that LGB teachers can be discursively constructed in opposition to childhood innocence, therefore LGB teachers can be deemed unprofessional or even a threat Frontiers in Education 04 frontiersin.org (Epstein and Johnson, 1998;Ferfolja, 2007Ferfolja, , 2014DePalma, 2010;Monk, 2011;Connell, 2015;Llewellyn, 2022a). ...
Article
Full-text available
Whilst protected by equality laws, lesbian gay and bisexual (LGB) teachers have varying experiences within United Kingdom schools. Schools are predominantly heteronormative, moreover LGB has been positioned as in conflict with discourses of childhood innocence. However, recently there is more expectation of inclusion of diverse gender and sexualities. Although how this is enacted is inconsistent within and between schools. By drawing on interview data conducted in 2020, this research analyses the experiences of LGB teachers. Moreover, it brings together two bodies of literature that do not often speak to each other—research that explores teacher identity and research that centers LGB teacher identity. Findings suggest there are commonalities between these bodies of research, for instance around the importance of ‘being yourself’ and of teachers’ past experiences. However, there is special significance for LGB teachers whose identities have historically been denied in schools, because of their sexual identity. In addition, there is the expectation under neoliberalism of individuals actioning inclusion. As such, the LGB teacher may become a pedagogical resource. None of this is equally available, although marketized notions of diversity place responsibility onto the individual. In their actions, the LGB teacher identity is always professional, personal and political.
... As LGBTQ people are primarily socially distinguished by their sexuality, LGBTQ issues are seen as inappropriate for children (Hicks, 2011: 109). Schools then utilise their power through only permitting certain heteronormative knowledges and restricting those relating to more deviant sexualities (Ferfolja, 2007). This indicates how scales beyond the school, including national values and social anxieties surrounding morality, impact upon the school as a space for children, their education and identity ...
... This highlights the fact that schools often only view acts and discourses as 'sexual' when they transgress heterosexuality, such as when LGBTQ families become visible in the educational setting. Therefore, LGBTQ sexualities become spatial, as they are forced into the 'private' space of the home, while concurrently condemned, scrutinised and regulated within school (Ferfolja, 2007). ...
Thesis
Despite the increasing literature on LGBTQ families, there continues to be limited research on the children within these families. The social, legal and political context for LGBTQ people has transformed drastically over the twentieth and twenty-first century. However, we know little about how these changes will have shaped the life courses of people raised by LGBTQ parents. The data within this thesis comes from 20 biographical interviews with adult-children raised by lesbian, bisexual, trans and queer (LBTQ) parents in England and Scotland. This thesis explores how people with LBTQ parents narrate their life stories, particularly addressing the intersections of family, identity, social norms and historical context. I use a combination of life course and queer theory to discuss the complex and messy everyday spatialities and relationalities found in participant life stories. The study examines the interplay between notions of normative families, genders and sexualities, and alternative everyday practices in families with LBTQ parents. This analysis is combined with a geographical and temporal lens, discussing how family practices, emotions and relationships can shift through time and space. I firstly discuss this in relation to genetic normativity, noting that although people with LBTQ parents often live in families that seem to resist dominant notions of biological relatedness, genetic discourses remain significant to those raised by LBTQ parents. This suggests that children raised in LBTQ households must navigate between the non-traditional aspects of their families and ongoing normative genetic discourses. Secondly, I examine queer origin stories, highlighting the ways that adult-children with LBTQ parents emphasise the importance of knowing their queer family histories, rather than only their genetic relations. This demonstrates the ways that adult-children can re-create, re-shape and re-tell their queer origin stories in adulthood. Third, I look into how participants narrated their experiences within the various spaces they moved between. I focus on the idea of ‘coming out’ or disclosure, to discuss how the power within specific contexts prompt different practices, displays, and feelings from people with LBTQ parents. Finally, I explore how participants related to ideas of normality and normativity more broadly, noting adult-children’s pursuit of intelligibility and legitimacy; how adult-children engage in quiet forms of everyday activism; and complicate traditional notions of the idealised life course. These findings contribute to the geographies of family and intimacy and sociological understandings of LGBTQ and queer kinship, adding to the limited body of work on children raised by non-heterosexual or gender confirming parents.
... Foucault (1990, p. 103;Čeplak, 2013, p. 162) claims sexuality to be the most instrumentalized element within power relations in the Western world. If we look at school as a space where power is being (re-)produced (Althusser, 2006, p. 88) and possibly resisted (Čeplak, 2013) and if we take into consideration the power of heteronormative discourse (Ferfolja, 2007) which dominates gender construction among youth (Jösting, 2007;Myers & Raymond, 2010;Garcia, 2009) and within school as an institution (Garcia, 2009;Čeplak, 2013); if we approach school systems as spaces which have difficulties accommodating "queer future" (McDonough, Zimenkova, Müller, Kronsbein & Moitor // Between LGBTTIQ-support and heteronormativity 5 2007, p. 798 3 ), then we might expect conflicting positions within the LGBTTIQ-school-supporters' discussions. The students who are involved in the LGBTTIQ-support projects cannot but be simultaneously subjected to heteronormative discourse. ...
... Education can become an important means for the inclusion of minorities and for deconstructing prejudice, discrimination and mobbing (Ferfolja, 2007;Mudrey & Medina-Adams, 2006;Čeplak, 2013). In/Exclusion are (re-)produced in educational practices as notions of norms and (ab-)normality, providing the participants of education processes with means to identify the (ab-)normal and to act with respect to it 4 . ...
Research
Full-text available
How does heteronormativity become visible within the discourse of LGBTTIQ-support activists at the school? Using data from non-moderated group discussions among schoolchildren aged between 14 and 18, who were involved in LGBTTIQ support projects in different schools within the German Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia, the article reconstructs how concepts of norms and normality, heteronormativity, difference and otherness are being articulated by the students. A sequential analysis of the group discussions is used to detect the meaning of norms and normality with respect to LGBTTIQ identities, to highlight the way in which LGBTTIQ-supporters are constantly being subjected to this discourse. Simul-taneously it detects a concealed conflict between the goal setting of LGBTTIQ support and heteronormative discourse. The paper underlines the mechanisms of problematizing LGBTTIQ-identities by students and framing them as non-normality, thus showing the power of heteronormative discourse, the very discourse young LGBTTIQ-supporters are trapped in and trying to cope with.
... Research has shown the impetus for addressing issues around sexuality and homophobia in teacher education as critical in getting pre-service teachers 1 ready to provide support for LGBTQ+ 2 pupils in schools, where institutional cultures are widely recognised as heteronormative (Ferfolja and Robinson 2004;Ferfolja 2001, 2002;Vavrus 2009). These cultures often discriminate against individuals who fail to conform to legitimate gender performances, reinforcing normalising heterosexist discourses that punish transgressors and is specifically a concern for LGBTQ+ identified teachers (DePalma and Jennett 2010;Ferfolja 2007aFerfolja , 2007bFerfolja , 2009Ferfolja and Hopkins 2013;Gray 2013;Gray, Harris, and Jones 2016;Henderson 2017;Rudoe 2010). While the experience of LGBTQ+ teachers in practice has a strong basis in the research literature, experiences of LGBTQ+ pre-service teachers is less understood. ...
... Given that much of the work on LGBTQ+ teachers have been framed by Foucault and other poststructuralist readings of discipline, negotiation and performance (e.g. Ferfolja 2007aFerfolja , 2007bFerfolja and Hopkins 2013;Ferfolja and Robinson 2004;Gray 2013) it would be remis to not accept its influence in the analysis process. What is missing from teaching identity research, however, is a specific examination of how LGBTQ+ trainees might develop borderland discourses in and through their training process. ...
Article
Experiences of non-heterosexual teachers are relatively understood, but little work focuses explicitly on LGBTQ+, pre-service teachers and none in the Australian context. Alsup’s ([2006]. Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. New York: Routledge.) borderland discourse is used to explore the role of gender and/or sexual identity in developing teacher identities of 12 Australian LGBTQ+ pre-service teachers. Findings show identity management and negotiation practices relating to decisions to hide or disclose identities in school contexts. Creating opportunities for borderland discourses, where tensions between the personal and professional can be deliberately brought to the fore, is presented as key to support the development of all new teachers.
... Moreover, sexual minorities are often essentialized as hypersexual and promiscuous, and thus their identities are seen to be at odds with the official school culture which constructs the ideal student subject as innocent and non-sexual (Allen, 2007;DePalma & Jennett, 2010). As a result, while overt homophobia has diminished in Western countries, non-heterosexuality is often silenced in schools to avoid children's exposure to alternative sexual identities, thus maintaining the presumption and privilege of heterosexuality (Ferfolja, 2007;McCormack, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
The minority stress theory predicts that sexual minorities experience more psychological distress than heterosexual individuals because of stigma-related stress. However, the gender shift theory argues that sexual-minority females experience less distress than heterosexual females because the former’s personality tends to shift in the male-typical direction and are less likely to possess neuroticism. We used a representative sample of Hong Kong secondary school adolescents (N = 6,725) to determine which theory would better explain the disparity in psychological distress between sexual-minority and heterosexual youth in the city. We conducted mediation analyses via structural equation modeling in the female sample (n = 2,984) and the male sample (n = 3,741) respectively. Our results support the minority stress theory, as sexual minorities of both sexes suffered from greater psychological distress as opposed to their heterosexual counterparts. Sexual orientation had a significant indirect effect on psychological distress via gender feeling, a measure of the extent to which individuals feel female or male. Sexual minorities who felt more like the opposite gender experienced more distress than their heterosexual counterparts. We also conducted an analysis of covariance to explore the between-group differences in psychological distress across sexual orientations in each sample. Our results show that bisexual/pansexual adolescents had significantly higher distress levels than their heterosexual and asexual counterparts.
... Chris reflected on the effectiveness of this handwritten sign, comparing it to posters from Stonewall's well known 'some people are gay, get over it!' campaign. Chris suggested that posters have limited impact after a while, as they stop being seen and do not encourage discussion of the topic, supporting Ferfolja's (2007) view that without appropriate context, posters and displays can often be tokenistic. With the teacher being the one to not only write the word, but encourage conversation of it, students got to see a role model engage with the topic and provide the 'real voices' required to challenge heteronormative institutions and present equal citizenship (Plummer 2001). ...
Article
Full-text available
At a time when UK schools are experiencing backlash for ensuring their LGBT+ colleagues and students are included, this article examines the ways in which schools create and uphold cisgender heterosexuality as the dominant narrative. The article presents the findings from four participants who took part in a photo elicitation study to represent their experiences as LGBT+ secondary school teachers in England. The photos and interviews reveal the myriad ways in which cisgender heteronormativity is produced in schools. The data also provides vital examples of how this dominant discourse is beginning to be challenged, and where small everyday acts can successfully disrupt the production of heteronormativity.
... This is not a shopping list of identities but rather indicates how gender is realised through dynamic, lively, affective processes. Nor is gender identity solely an individualised, internalised process-it is simultaneously relational, contingent, interactive, reliant on recognition and mastery of gendered norms-and also institutionally formed and regulated (Butler, 1990;Davies, 1989;Ferfolja, 2007;Rasmussen, 2009;Rawlings, 2017;Robinson, 2000;Saltmarsh, 2008;Wolfe, 2021). In the earlier policy period, gender was defined always in terms of binaries such as boy/girl, male/ female, masculine/ feminine. ...
Article
Full-text available
This special issue presents a collection of recent papers drawing on qualitative research in and about schooling in Australia and the ways in which gender-related issues in the broadest sense continue to shape people’s educational experiences. These papers from the present are positioned in relation to the long histories of policy and research attention to gender equity in Australian education. We set the context for work in the present by scanning the past, noting the ambitions, the gaps and the failures of earlier policies, and drawing attention to the quality and volume of research that has previously been undertaken in this area. We explore the current policy vacuum regarding gender to consider some of the pressures and complexities that have led to the erasure or avoidance of gender-related issues. Each of the papers that form this special issue demonstrate—despite different methods, theoretical frameworks, settings and participant cohorts—how stereotypes and limitations circulate in everyday life in schools and beyond them, and how these impact on people. They each explore from a different starting point how gender injustices are perpetuated and produced, in often subtle and nuanced ways that require concerted effort to unpack. They simultaneously offer insights into the critical and creative ways that young people and those around them are reconfiguring gender and seeking more hopeful and more equitable educational experiences and outcomes. Collectively, the papers that form this special issue advocate for policies and practices that embrace the complexities of young people's lives and are oriented towards inclusive and equitable educational environments.
... The ill-defined nature of professionalism (Mizzi 2016) means educators risk being deemed 'unprofessional' by administrators, staff, and community members as a reflection of queerness as inherently deviant or wrong. Historically, LGBTQIA+ people have been maligned through such discourses and dominant discourses linking queerness to promiscuity, mental illness, disease, hypersexuality, child molestation or recruiting students to be queer (Clarke 2006;Ferfolja 2007Ferfolja , 2008Mizzi 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper explores the experiences of embedding queer perspectives and approaches into Initial Teacher Education (ITE). Initial teacher education is a topic of great interest; however, little is known about how teacher educators and teacher training institutions can support queer preservice and graduate teachers’ transition into their chosen profession. Queer educators face unique challenges, including homophobia and transphobia, covert and complex norms that regulate and silence queer identities, and systemic, macro forces that play out in everyday work. This article explores the literature on this topic. A brief review of the literature contextualizes issues relevant to this article to frame an account of four reflective vignettes that illustrate key concepts. Concepts including queerness and queer identities, heterocentricity, heteroprofessionalism, the nature and impact of homophobia and transphobia in educational contexts, neoliberalism, critical theory and critical literacies are used to connect the reflective vignettes to these ideas. It concludes with recommendations for teacher educators and training institutions and future research. Recommendations for teachers and teacher educators are relayed including the facilitation of spaces for queer and allied educators as well as strategies for queering curriculum.
... Katlego needed to perform hyperprofessionalism, hence his instantly reporting the incident to the principal, with the hope of distancing himself from any form of disgrace and undesirable attention. Teachers who identify as LGBT are at risk of being socially framed as unfit for the teaching profession (Msibi, 2019) because they are accused of being 'converters' of innocent heterosexual learners (DePalma & Atkinson, 2006;Kagola & Notshulwana, 2023) or having the potential to sexually molest them (Ferfolja, 2007). The intervention from the principal enabled Katlego to maintain his respectability in the workplace and avoid being the target of homophobia (despite him being heterosexual). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Scholars researching the issues of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBT) are being denounced as performers of ‘dirty’ work and promotors of ‘immorality’. Such scholars face obstacles in the workplace, such as difficulties in obtaining ethical approval, scarcity of funding, bullying, denial of promotion and unacknowledged scholarship, among other struggles.Objectives: This article intends to highlight the unintended, unanticipated and often overlooked impact that certain LGBT research interests have on the professional and personal identities of the scholar.Method: This exploratory qualitative study uses a reflexive dialogical single case study approach to understand how Katlego (a pseudonym), a cisgender heterosexual researcher, is affected by his interest in LGBT studies. Continuous supervision notes that enable thoughtful reflexive practice in qualitative research shaped the basis of this article.Results: This article shows how Katlego’s LGBT research interest resulted in him being policed, his professional intentions questioned, his bodily expression scrutinised and personal conflict being blamed on his allegedly ‘disgraceful’ research interest. Furthermore, it demonstrates how the conflation of Katlego’s interest in LGBT research with pervasive negative assumptions of non-heteronormative sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions has resulted in a shift in his professional and personal identities.Conclusion: This article calls for awareness of the issues faced by all researchers interested in LGBT research and support strategies for navigating the professional identity, workplace environment and social ecologies within a frowned-upon research field. Failure to do so could compromise their career trajectory, well-being and safety in compulsory heterosexual environments.Contribution: This article illustrated how gender regimes position the researcher as an active creator of knowledge; therefore, the research process experiences can neither be made invisible nor neutralised. Researchers must overtly consider and prepare for situational and unanticipated ethical issues.
... This double bind forces LGBT+ teachers into a dilemma of either revealing their identity and disrupting these silent norms or concealing their identity to meet heteronormative expectations. Many scholars have explored the experiences of LGBT+ teachers within heteronormative institutions (Cohen, Duarte, and Ross 2023;Llewellyn and Reynolds 2021;Johnson 2023;DePalma and Atkinson 2009;Ferfolja 2007), highlighting the distinct challenges they often face. This article deploys a unique theoretical framework, with a photo elicitation methodology, to reveal the in-the-moment and often invisible experiences of four LGBT+ teachers. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article examines how schools are produced as spaces for heterosexual, cisgender citizens. Lefebvre’s spatial triad is employed to analyse how conceived, perceived and lived spaces interact to produce a space that is often experienced as one of surveillance for LGBT+ people. This surveillance can lead to the internalisation of negative social attitudes and experiences of minority stress. The article details the experiences of four LGBT+ teachers who took part in a photo elicitation study, which involved taking photographs of spaces in their school that represented where they felt most and least safe. These accounts bring to life the small and subtle ways in which schools are produced and experienced as heteronormative environments. The article concludes that more needs to be done by school leaders to ensure the inclusion and safety of their LGBT+ staff and students, and that an equity model that listens to the lived experience of LGBT+ people is central to achieving this.
... Con "eterosessismo" si intende quel complesso di norme che squalificano i rapporti sessuali e sentimentali tra persone dello stesso sesso, presentando come unico orientamento sessuale naturale quello eterosessuale, e considerando tutto ciò che non rientra pienamente nel canone del binarismo sessuale e di genere come inferiore se non addirittura disgustoso e moralmente riprovevole (cfr. Roussos e Dovidio 2018; Atkinson e DePalma 2009;Ferfolja 2007). Dall'altro lato si trova l'omofobia, che si può considerare il braccio armato dell'eterosessismo, e che consiste in tutte quelle pratiche sociali volte a discriminare chi ha una sessualità e un ruolo di genere non conforme agli standard eterosessuali. ...
Article
Full-text available
In “Down Girl. The Logic of Misogyny” Kate Manne offre una nuova definizione di misoginia come un sistema di premi e punizioni che mira a mantenere l’ordine patriarcale, che si distingue dal sessismo, che è invece l’ideologia che giustifica i ruoli tra i generi nella società patriarcale.In questo modo, l’autrice riesce a rendere conto di fenomeni che differiscono per carattere e intensità, come una battuta sessista e un femminicidio, e a sottolinearne la matrice comune. Il libro fa continuo riferimento ad avvenimenti reali come esempi di questo fenomeno. La distinzione riesce a cogliere il fenomeno, tanto che il testo probabilmente diventerà un punto imprescindibile all’interno del dibattito sul genere e i rapporti tra i generi.
... Yet, a narrow focus on RSE and safeguarding policies that support reporting and responding to sexual violence, does not adequately recognise the holistic nature of the ways that schools operate to produce norms of sexuality and gender (e.g., Pomerantz et al., 2013). The reproduction of hierarchical, unequal, patriarchal practices that produce cis heteronormative gender roles positioning white, middle-class, hegemonic heteronormative masculinity as the most valuable presentation and practice of gender, takes place in every classroom and playground setting, in assemblies and in extracurricular activities (see also Ferfolja, 2007). Pomerantz et al. (2013:264) call this the heterosexualisation of children. ...
Article
Full-text available
Schools continue to produce regimes of gender and sexuality, including overt and covert curricula based on assumed essentialist differences between girls and boys, reinforced and regulated through uniform, sport and peer pressure. The recent focus on the experiences of trans and non‐binary children in schools makes visible the ways in which all children are subject to heteronormatively gendered regulatory and disciplinary techniques in everyday school life. This article discusses the findings from a pilot study drawing on participatory action research techniques with 42 young people in six workshops in north‐east England. Recruitment methods were required to be flexible given the context within which the study was conducted, which was with Covid‐19 mitigations in place. This meant that we were not able to be fully inclusive of young people from local youth groups as they were either not meeting or only meeting online. We thus had to mainly recruit from university student societies and student residences from which we organised three workshops; sports organisations from which we organised one workshop, and a local youth group with which we ran one workshop. The final workshop was conducted with young people who had attended one of the previous five workshops, to enable feedback on our analysis. All participants were over 16 years of age. The majority of participants were women (25) with 16 men, including one transman, and one non‐binary person. Most identified as white (31) with the rest identifying as Black, East Asian and British ‘Other’ (11). The focus of the workshops was to explore with young people their memories about where and how they first encountered being ‘gendered’ and/or having a sexuality. The data has been collected, recorded and transcribed within strict ethical guidelines. The workshop data has been analysed using a grounded theory approach, where we developed the theoretical models from the data. This article focuses on those key moments when their behaviours, presentation and/or ideas were subject to facilitators and/or regulators of their gender and/or sexuality. We draw out the contradictions inherent in, on the one hand, the essentialist rationales for difference and inequalities between genders and sexualities in schools and, on the other hand, the apparent need to enforce these ‘natural’ differences and inequalities. Participatory creative approaches were adopted in each workshop to promote conversations and drawings about who regulated/facilitated their gender and/or sexuality and how they did so. Each workshop cumulatively informed the next, leading to a sixth synthesising workshop that collectively analysed young people's reflections. Drawing on the conceptual frameworks of epistemic injustice (M. Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford University Press, 2007) and ‘space for action’ we conclude that young people want and need brave active spaces to discuss and ‘do’ gender and sexuality, and to resist essentialism and social control. Schools can be both places where control is created and entrenched and where it can also be resisted. Our research suggests that better whole school responses to dismantle regimes of gender and sexuality can be created by and for young people.
... Katlego needed to perform hyperprofessionalism, hence his instantly reporting the incident to the principal, with the hope of distancing himself from any form of disgrace and undesirable attention. Teachers who identify as LGBT are at risk of being socially framed as unfit for the teaching profession (Msibi, 2019) because they are accused of being 'converters' of innocent heterosexual learners (DePalma & Atkinson, 2006;Kagola & Notshulwana, 2023) or having the potential to sexually molest them (Ferfolja, 2007). The intervention from the principal enabled Katlego to maintain his respectability in the workplace and avoid being the target of homophobia (despite him being heterosexual). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Scholars researching the issues of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBT) are being denounced as performers of ‘dirty’ work and promotors of ‘immorality’. Such scholars face obstacles in the workplace, such as difficulties in obtaining ethical approval, scarcity of funding, bullying, denial of promotion and unacknowledged scholarship, among other struggles. Objectives: This article intends to highlight the unintended, unanticipated and often overlooked impact that certain LGBT research interests have on the professional and personal identities of the scholar. Method: This exploratory qualitative study uses a reflexive dialogical single case study approach to understand how Katlego (a pseudonym), a cisgender heterosexual researcher, is affected by his interest in LGBT studies. Continuous supervision notes that enable thoughtful reflexive practice in qualitative research shaped the basis of this article. Results: This article shows how Katlego’s LGBT research interest resulted in him being policed, his professional intentions questioned, his bodily expression scrutinised and personal conflict being blamed on his allegedly ‘disgraceful’ research interest. Furthermore, it demonstrates how the conflation of Katlego’s interest in LGBT research with pervasive negative assumptions of non-heteronormative sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions has resulted in a shift in his professional and personal identities. Conclusion: This article calls for awareness of the issues faced by all researchers interested in LGBT research and support strategies for navigating the professional identity, workplace environment and social ecologies within a frowned-upon research field. Failure to do so could compromise their career trajectory, well-being and safety in compulsory heterosexual environments. Contribution: This article illustrated how gender regimes position the researcher as an active creator of knowledge; therefore, the research process experiences can neither be made invisible nor neutralised. Researchers must overtly consider and prepare for situational and unanticipated ethical issues.
... Often overgeneralised, negative and inaccurate stereotypes (Allport, 1954) about transgender people in Africa have resulted in fatalities, gruesome violence and social rejection (Human Dignity Trust, 2020). The questioning of Selma's interest in teaching could be seen as an overgeneralised stereotype that teachers who identify as LGBT are at risk of being socially framed as unsuitable for the teaching profession (Msibi, 2019) because they are assumed to have the potential to sexually molest learners (Ferfolja, 2007). This misconstrued view could influence the selection process and presentation of questions to the transgender job applicant. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Previous research about transgender people’s workplace experiences has confirmed intense levels of discrimination and prejudice. There is a particular silence on trans people’s experiences in the job interview. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore how transgender people are dealt with in job interviews. Method: This single case-study approach explore the experiences of transgender youth in presenting for a job interview. An in-depth semi-structured interview was the primary data-collection method. Content analysis was applied to the data and yielded a discussion focusing on the various job interview experiences affecting perceived discrimination, career aspirations and personal well-being. Results: This study describes how Selma, a transgender woman, was subjected to overt discrimination based on her gender expressions considered incongruent with expected norms. Her feminine voice and mannerisms resulted in her being ridiculed and humiliated during the interview process. In some instances, the interview process was interrupted in a hostile manner to confirm whether she was a man or a woman or to pressure her to speak like a man. This study suggests that the Namibian labour market insists on compulsory cis-heteronormative embodiment. Conclusion: This study calls for awareness training about transgender people and workplace inclusivity. It also recommends that employers develop and implement a post-interview feedback tool to explore invited interviewees’ experiences. Contribution: This study highlights how job interviews, as an entry requirement to the job market, are riddled with prejudices, stereotypes of and discrimination towards transgender people.
... Law enforcement culture embodies larger socio-political contexts of traditional masculinity and heteronormativity [143,144], which may perpetuate anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment and resistance to diversity training [145][146][147]. A history of anti-TGD raids; over-policing; excessive force; sexual, physical, and verbal harassment; negative attitudes; and neglect through denial of services have all been fostered by a culture within law enforcement that precludes their trust with the TGD community [143,[148][149][150][151]. Transgender people may have additional fears related to engaging with law enforcement, such as being profiled as a sex worker, arbitrary arrest for breaking gender norms or "moral regulations" (e.g., lewdness), and accusations of having fraudulent identification. ...
Article
Full-text available
Forensic anthropology and, more broadly, the forensic sciences have only recently begun to acknowledge the importance of lived gender identity in the resolution of forensic cases, the epidemic of anti-transgender violence, and the need to seek practical solutions. The current literature suggests that forensic anthropologists are becoming aware of these issues and are working toward efforts to improve identification of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons. The scope of the problem, however, is not limited to methodology and instead can be traced to systemic anti-trans stigma ingrained within our cultural institutions. As such, we call on forensic anthropologists to counteract cisgenderism and transphobia and promote gender equity and inclusion in their practice. In this paper, we identify three areas in which forensic anthropologists may be positioned to intervene on cisgenderist practices and systems: in casework, research, and education. This paper aims to provide strategies for forensic anthropologists to improve resolution of TGD cases, produce more nuanced, gender-informed research, and promote gender equity and inclusion in the field.
... However, research has shown this can be incredibly challenging and complex precisely because police are highly resistant to changes in policy and procedure that require them to treat transgender people with respect (Israel et al., 2017). Cisnormative and heteronormative institutions, like schools (Ferfolja, 2007) and police (Israel et al., 2017), sustain antitransgender attitudes and practices. Policies and training seeking to enculturate police officers towards supporting transgender people fundamentally challenge ingrained cisnormative and heteronormative ideas. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter charts the key issues influencing how policing is experienced by transgender people. A growing body of research in this area has begun to elaborate the very challenging and violent experiences that transgender people have with criminal processing systems worldwide and the immense inequities they face in these systems, regardless of whether they are victims, offenders, or witnesses. The chapter therefore overviews the key concerns impacting police interactions with transgender people, including issues such as being profiled as sex workers as an entry point to police experiences, violence experienced from police, and inappropriate searches, custody issues, and misgendering by police officers when they are being processed.
... However, research has shown this can be incredibly challenging and complex precisely because police are highly resistant to changes in policy and procedure that require them to treat transgender people with respect (Israel et al., 2017). Cisnormative and heteronormative institutions, like schools (Ferfolja, 2007) and police (Israel et al., 2017), sustain antitransgender attitudes and practices. Policies and training seeking to enculturate police officers towards supporting transgender people fundamentally challenge ingrained cisnormative and heteronormative ideas. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Drawing on data from the United States, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and Brazil, this chapter outlines forms of abuse and violence present in school spaces and suggests ways to stop transgender and gender non-conforming youth, particularly young people of color, from ending up in the school-to-prison pipeline. It will first discuss the history of policing gender. Second, it provides a global overview of the detrimental effects of bullying. Third, it describes how transgender, and gender non-conforming youth come to be incarcerated. The chapter concludes with some policy suggestions that might be helpful in reducing the number transgender and gender non-conforming youth that are incarcerated, as well as suggestions that may help transgender and gender non-conforming students finish their education.
... The participants' justifications were made on grounds that peers were perceived as having a collective social power that could impose relatable ethical standards and appropriate justice [36][37][38] while the teacher, acts as a singular authority figure of nonequivalent power and is separate to that of the students. Alex remarked "I think peer intervention will always be stronger . . . it shows support from like the same level". ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper we draw on stories of schooling as told by three transgender secondary school graduates. The study does not aim to be generalizable or ‘speak’ for the educational experiences of all Australian transgender-identifying students. The study is framed by first person articulations of what a trans-positive educational experience might involve. The paper leverages a life-history approach in which the participants rearticulate the influence that cisnormative school environments and media practices had on their transition timeframes. Throughout the life-history interviews conducted in a focus group, the participants considered the concept of how a trans-positive educational approach could be deployed in schools to develop services and resources that align with the findings of the National LGBTIQ Health Alliance, 2020.
... The existing literature identifies the difficult relationship that has always existed between schools and sexuality (Ferfolja 2007;Epstein and Johnson 1998;DePalma and Atkinson 2006). The findings from this study support this view, but also highlight how cisgender heteronormative expectations may be evolving, leading to greater acceptance of some LGBT+ identities in schools. ...
Article
Full-text available
There is an important and broad range of existing literature exploring the experiences of lesbian and gay teachers. However, most of this literature adopts a deficit model whereby openly lesbian and gay teachers are viewed as likely to experience personal and professional difficulty. This article offers a more nuanced, and sometimes positive, portrayal of the experiences of LGBT+ secondary school teachers. It presents findings from a case study of three teachers engaging in a photo elicitation research project, in which participants took photographs in their schools to represent the spaces where they felt most and least safe. Participants later discussed the significance of these pictures in one-to-one interviews, revealing key insights that were often time and contextually specific. Although many of the findings support the view that being an openly LGBT+ teacher can present challenges, the research also provided examples of more positive narratives. These narratives present a new and hopeful perspective, where LGBT+ teachers’ identities can carry a form of queer capital, offering important positives for both the teachers themselves and the schools in which they work.
... Cis-heteronormativity refers to specific social norms around gender that privilege heterosexuality and binary gender and dictate what is typical and appropriate behaviour for men and women (Cislaghi & Heise, 2020). The presence of cisheteronormativity in schools is recognised by pupils (Kjaran & Jóhannesson, 2013;Mishna et al., 2009) and teaching staff (Edwards et al., 2016;Vega et al., 2012) and evident within policies, pedagogies and practices that endorse gender norms (Allen, 2015;Boe et al., 2020;Enson, 2015;Ferfolja, 2007;Herz & Johansson, 2015;McNeill, 2013;Steck & Perry, 2018;Toomey et al., 2012). ...
Thesis
Gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) young people (YP) frequently spend their youth exploring and discovering their identities. At this time, they often begin to think about how and when to disclose their GSD identity to others in a variety of contexts; this dynamic and ongoing process can be termed visibility management (VM). At school, GSD YP actively test social reactions, interpret attitudes, and assess safety; ultimately, seeking to be an authentic self and to find acceptance and community. This systematic review explored findings from 16 qualitative studies capturing GSD YP’s experiences of managing visibility in schools internationally. Data was thematically synthesised and seven themes were constructed: We need to explore, discover and accept who we are before we can be our authentic selves, Visibility management is a constant negotiation and a fluid process, We are influenced and oppressed by norms; our visibility breaks norms and changes culture, We are acutely aware and often fearful of social reactions to the visibility of GSD people and to disclosure, We need school staff to do more to support us, We need a visible community to feel safe and experience belonging and We fight for our right to be visible. Implications for practice are discussed. GSD YP transgress social and gender norms and are at an elevated risk for bullying in secondary school. In the UK, GSD identity-based bullying is pervasive and colours the lives of many GSD YP. It constitutes trauma and often results in negative mental health outcomes. Posttraumatic Growth (PTG) is the perception of positive psychological growth following trauma and has been recorded following various traumata, including interpersonal trauma. In adults and YP, several predictors of PTG have been identified. However, little is currently known about its antecedents in GSD YP. This study aimed to address this gap in the field. Survey data was collected from 173 participants (aged 16-25 years) who self-identified as GSD. Independent variables included social acceptance and support from secondary school friends, social support from school staff, engagement in activism, GSD school culture and sense of school belonging. Data was analysed using multiple regression. Results demonstrate the model was statistically significantly predictive of PTG in this population, with social support and acceptance from school friends being the strongest predictors. The study concluded that multiple facets of social support and acceptance promote positive outcomes following GSD identity-based bullying and that the support and acceptance of friends is particularly critical.
... Estas narrativas reflejan un cuestionamiento implícito y explícito a la producción de las normalidades de sexo/género. Aquello incluye una revisión de prácticas culturales sexistas y heteronormadas que se encuentran institucionalizadas en las escuelas (Ferfolja, 2007;Youdell, 2005). Incluso en algunos casos, como en Simone, se les intenta subvertir ocupando al propio cuerpo como un recurso (Butler, 2005). ...
Book
Full-text available
Libro colectivo del Programa GEDIS, de investigación en sexualidad y género de la Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
... For LGBTQ+ schoolteachers, this has meant operating within spaces where their sexuality and/or gender is often seen as in conflict with their profession (Connell, 2015;Neary, 2013)with the archetype of the teacher being framed around asexuality and heterosexuality (Llewellyn & Reynolds, 2021). This is premised upon a related discursive framing of childhood, where students are positioned as in need of protecting from the adult topic of sexuality (DePalma, 2010;Epstein & Johnson, 1998;Ferfolja, 2007;Renold, 2005). However, within this 'regime of truth … that is, the types of discourse which it accepts and makes function as true' (Foucault, 1980, p. 131), many schools in the UK have, to varying degrees, implemented some aspects of LGBTQ+ inclusion, leading to LGBTQ+ teachers to navigate tensions that arise from 'doing' diversity (or not) within a predominantly heteronormative neoliberal environment (Llewellyn & Reynolds, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
LGBTQ+ teachers have been noted to struggle with conflicting professional and personal subjectivities within schools, which are sites of (re)production of heteronormativity. This clash relies upon positioning LGBTQ+ as an adult activity in opposition to discourses of childhood, which are framed around protection and innocence. This research, however, took place at a time of potential change, with aspects of LGBTQ+ inclusion being present within UK schools to varying degrees. In 2020, 50 UK LGBTQ+ teachers engaged in individual semi-structured interviews. Thematic Foucauldian analysis was applied to the data to examine both the discourses produced by the teachers and the subjectivities that were navigated. Findings suggest that many teachers are able to disrupt the binaries of professional/personal and a ‘new’ teacher subjectivity emerges, that acknowledges their LGBTQ+ status. This is framed around neoliberal traits of honesty and authenticity. In relation, the binary distinction between student and teacher is navigated, and childhood is no longer discursively constructed by the teachers as innocent; instead, students are framed around their agency and social awareness. However, there is evidence that protectionist discourses of the child, and professional discourses of the teacher, are also being used to prevent LGBTQ+ inclusion, and restrict LGBTQ+ teachers.
... The relatively negative attitude adopted by pre-service teachers toward the LGBT population has also been reported in previous studies conducted in the USA and Turkey (Calzo & Ward, 2009;Gelbal & Duyan, 2006;Haşıl Korkmaz & Ünal, 2015). The majority of teachers are not educated to appreciate homosexuality as normal, which may contribute to feelings of insecurity and isolation among queer students (Ferfolja, 2007;Ferfolja & Robinson, 2004;Prettyman, 2007). A possible reason for the negative attitudes of Turkish pre-service teachers toward LGBT people could be their conservative orientation, stemming from religious morality and homophobic prejudice (Holland et al., 2013;Yılmaz, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper we elaborate on the relationships among multicultural education, democratic values, and LGBT individuals, based on the attitudes of pre-service teachers, who are soon-to-be major conduits to students of societies' attitudes. Accordingly, we also investigated the predictive role of multicultural education and democratic values on the LGBT attitudes of preservice teachers. We discovered that Turkish pre-service teachers have positive attitudes toward multicultural education and democratic values. Further, the participants were found to exhibit moderate positive attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that the attitudes toward multicultural education and democratic values are significant predictors of attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Overall, we discuss the intertwined relationships among attitudes to multicultural education, democratic values, and LGBT individuals, and the probable factors biasing pre-service teachers against LGBT issues.
... Este disciplinamiento ocurre fundamentalmente a nivel corporal (Scharagrodsky, 2007). En contextos escolares, se ha evidencia que cuando la heteronormatividad no es cuestionada, se genera exclusión y violencia sistemática hacia personas LGBTQ+ (Ferfolja, 2007;Gelpi y Montes de Oca, 2020). En línea con la heteronormatividad, cobra sentido hablar de masculinidad hegemónica (Bonino, 2002) como el modelo tradicional de socialización de los hombres, el cual busca posicionar al sujeto masculino separado de la feminidad y de la homosexualidad. ...
Article
Full-text available
El presente artículo da cuenta de un estudio, posicionado desde el feminismo y la etnografía escolar, sobre los eventos que perciben docentes en formación durante sus prácticas en instituciones escolares respecto de la transmisión de normas de género, sexismo y discriminación hacia diversidades sexuales y de género. El estudio se llevó a cabo con una muestra de nueve docentes en formación de diversas disciplinas, quienes realizaron registros etnográficos en los contextos escolares en los que se encontraban insertos/as. Los datos fueron analizados desde el feminismo post-estructural mediante el análisis temático reflexivo. Los resultados dan cuenta de la naturalización de mandatos para construir una feminidad tradicional y una masculinidad hegemónica en la escuela, junto con una incuestionada heteronormatividad en las instituciones escolares. Así mismo, se presentan algunas iniciativas transformadoras para la escuela desde una perspectiva de género, como el uso del lenguaje inclusivo y la incorporación de referentes feministas en clases, sin embargo, estos no representan avances articulados por parte de los establecimientos para reflexionar o dialogar sobre temáticas de género. Las y los docentes en formación planten la necesidad de avanzar hacia la transformación social a partir de la perspectiva de género en la escuela.
... The literature on preparing LGBTQ+-inclusive elementary educators has long suggested that teachers need to move in this direction (e.g., DePalma & Atkinson, 2009García & Slesaransky-Poe, 2010). This is because cis-heteronormativity sends strong messages about what counts as "normal" with respect to sexuality, families, relationships, gender, and gender roles, and research shows that these messages are institutionalized in school through policies, curriculum, language, discourse, and teaching practices (e.g., Blackburn & Smith, 2010;Ferfolja, 2007;Garcia, 2009). Briefly, heteronormativity refers to a pervasive belief system that assumes everyone is straight; that being straight is normal; and that anything outside that norm, including people, relationships, and families, is abnormal, weird, and deviant. ...
Article
Background/Context A significant body of research on gender and sexual diversity in education has called on teachers to “move beyond inclusion” of LGBTQ+ voices in curriculum by queering their practice and “disrupting cis-heteronormativity.” Few studies have focused on the ways that disrupting cis-heteronormativity is challenging work for teachers to engage. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study In this case study, we focus on patterned moves that Laura, a first-grade teacher, made to disrupt cis-heteronormativity by supporting her students in cultivating what we call a “queer mindset”—a way of thinking, feeling, and doing that “rattles” her students’ common sense. Research Design The qualitative study reflects a nested case study design in which Laura represents an individual case within the broader case. Specifically, we use instrumental case study methodology. Conclusions/Recommendations To make good on the goal of disrupting cis-heteronormativity, we encourage educators to cultivate in their students ways of thinking, feeling, and doing that upend common sense and that challenge the status quo. We encourage educators to support their students in developing queer mindsets. This way, not only can educators support individual students, but they can also propel the kind of social transformation we want to see.
... Slogans they disseminated in public spaces included "Defend Romania's children," or, "In school, children will be taught that mother is not a woman and father is not a man" (Romania Insider, 2018, n.p.). Generally, their discourse raised issues of stigmatisation and marginalisation of children from LGBT families (Ferfolja, 2007;Luzia, 2010) through institutional processes that might enable homophobia. The fundamentalist Orthodox population responded to this call and had a high participation to vote. ...
Article
Full-text available
As marriage is defined in post‐socialist Romania as the union of two spouses and not specifically between a man and a woman, the legalization of homosexuality in 2002 created the possibility for legal same‐sex marriage and for a more inclusive sexual citizenship. By 2018, a political alliance mobilized a referendum to redefine marriage in a way that would make families headed by same‐sex couples impossible. LGBT rights organizations and others who promote a more tolerant society urged Romanian citizens to boycott the vote. Eventually, due to a missing quorum the referendum was invalidated leaving the definition of marriage as it was – between two spouses. With a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, we analyze the way that this referendum functioned as a test of the re‐definition of family within the post‐socialist Romanian political space. The failure of this legislation then leads to our central question – were Romanians acting to promote a more tolerant and inclusive definition of family or were they merely reacting against the politicians, religious and other influential groups who initiated the referendum? First, the discourse analysis presents the various sets of ideas employed by actors involved for and against the referendum. Then we conduct a spatial analysis to reveal the territorial articulations of obedience to vote (voter turn‐out) and the results of voting along with other demographic characteristics. Even though the majority of the population with the right to vote preferred to boycott the referendum, our research demonstrates the spatial articulation of attitudes towards LGBT families showing that in Romania there are five overlapping discourses: the tolerant, the politically conformant, the homophobic, the passive rural and the homosexual.
... As expected, different-sex couples were thought to be stereotyped with heterosexual gender roles. Further, reflecting the pervasiveness of heteronormative cultural ideology (Ferfolja, 2007;Herek, 2004), the majority of participants also said that different-sex couples would be seen by others as normal. Interestingly, when heterosexual gender stereotypes were said to be applied by others to same-sex relationships, they were more commonly mentioned in relation to same-sex attracted women, with one woman said to be seen as the "man" in the relationship. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
Although victim and perpetrator gender are proposed to influence legally relevant decision-making in cases of intimate partner violence (IPV), there is limited research into factors that may influence decision-making in ‘non-prototypical’ cases of IPV, such as that which occurs between same-sex partners. While research conducted in other contexts suggests that stereotypes about sexual orientation and gender-roles impact perceptions of others (Levahot & Lambert, 2007), the influence of these stereotypes on decision-making in same-sex IPV has not been widely considered. Rather, within the same-sex IPV literature it is suggested that characterisations of same-sex IPV are based on heterosexual gender stereotypes simply applied to same-sex partnerships (Terrance & Little, 2010). However, whether this is an accurate representation of these relationships has not been empirically evaluated. Further, it is unclear precisely how the application of these stereotypes impacts third-party perceptions of same-sex IPV. Research exploring the impact of gender stereotypes on the evaluation of same-sex IPV has produced inconsistent results (Russell & Kraus, 2016; Wasarhaley, et al., 2015). Given that the referral of IPV cases (as with other cases) through the legal system is based on beliefs about how others may perceive the case and evidence (Lievore, 2004), it is important to examine the extent to which stereotypes about gender and sexual orientation influence legal decisions in cases of same-sex IPV. This thesis draws on social psychological theories of stereotyping to investigate people's decision-making processes and legally-relevant judgements about same-sex IPV. Using a mixed-methods approach comprising qualitative and experimental studies, I draw on the cognitive optimiser approach to stereotyping (Macrae, et al., 1994), Role Congruity Theory (Eagly & Diekman, 2005) and Status Incongruity Hypothesis (SIH) (Moss-Racusin, et al., 2010), to first establish the stereotypes drawn on when making judgments about these kinds of cases, and then to examine how and why people respond negatively to victims of IPV who deviate from stereotypic gender expectations. Chapter 1 provides a general overview of the existing literature in the areas of same-sex IPV, and IPV more generally, and identifies the key theoretical constructs relevant to the current program of research. Chapter 2 reports two qualitative studies aimed at identifying the societal beliefs that exist about different-sex and same-sex relationships, without (N = 170) and with IPV (N =251). Results show that stereotypes about partners within same-sex relationships differ when viewed in the context of violence. In relationships without violence, the dominant stereotypes reflect gender inverse, gender typical, and heterosexual gender roles. However, in relationships with violence, the focus shifts to gender typical stereotypes, which appear to influence the perceived severity of the abuse. These findings suggest that examining the impact of gender typical stereotypes may provide clarity around how people perceive, and respond to, same-sex IPV. In Chapter 3 we present the first experimental study (N = 168), which draws on the cognitive optimiser approach to stereotyping (Macrae et al., 1994) to explore the role of gender-related stereotypes and strength of evidence on legally-relevant decision making in cases of same-sex IPV. The results of Chapter 3 show that, stereotypes associated with the victim and perpetrator's gender differentially impact perceptions of severity, guilt, and the stereotypicality of the violence. Specifically, male perpetrators are more likely to be viewed as guilty than female perpetrators. However, violence against men was perceived as less severe than violence against women, regardless of the gender of the perpetrator, or the type of violence perpetrated. These findings further highlight the importance of investigating the role of traditional gender stereotypes on perceptions of same-sex IPV. Chapter 4 details three experimental studies (N = 269, N = 934, N = 732) that replicate the finding that male victims of IPV are perceived more negatively that female victims of IPV, regardless of the perpetrator’s gender. I draw on Role Congruity Theory (Eagly & Diekman, 2005) and the SIH (Moss-Racusin, et al., 2010), to examine how and why people engage in ‘backlash’, -- that is, respond negatively to victims of IPV-- who deviate from stereotypic gender expectations. Chapter 4 demonstrates - for the first time - that backlash against male victims of IPV is a reaction to perceived threats to the gender hierarchy. Further, I find that those who more strongly endorse male role norms (i.e., cultural expectations and definitions of masculine behaviour) judge both male and female victims of IPV in same-sex relationships more negatively than those in different-sex relationships. Finally, Chapter 5 summarises the results of the program of research, discusses the findings in relation to the existing literature, and offers directions for further work in this area. The work presented in this thesis highlights the pivotal role that the endorsement of traditional gender-role beliefs play in the perception of, and responses to, same-sex IPV. This research provides a foundation from which methods to diminish the impact of these extra-legal beliefs in real-world cases can be developed.
... It is not the aim of this paper to provide a detailed account of the literature that addresses LGBTQ inclusion/exclusion in Australian schools, but to set the scene for what Ferfolja (2007) argues: how heterosexuality is privileged in many aspects of curriculum although non-normative sexualities are tacitly hidden and framed as the "educational other" (Slee, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Sexual culture(s) are an active presence in the shaping of school relations, and LGBTQ issues have long been recognized as a dangerous form of knowledge in school settings. Queer issues in educational domains quickly attract surveillance and have historically often been aggressively prosecuted and silence enforced. This paper examines the intersections of straight allies in promoting an LGBTQ visibility and agency in Australian secondary schools. Drawing on interviews with “straight”-identified secondary students, a narrative methodology was utilized to explore the presence of student allies for making safe schools. Drawing on straight secondary students' responses to LGBTQ issues in their schools, firsthand accounts of intervening in heteronorming school cultures focus on experiences of being an ally to address LGBTQ inclusivity in Australian secondary schools.
... How the reproduction of heteronormativity plays out in sex education has also been a particularly dominant feature of the literature in recent years. See, for example, Epstein et al. (2004), Youdell (2004), De Palma and Atkinson (2006), and Ferfolja (2007). in the inscription of a clear linkage in the framework for school inspection between the promotion of sexual orientation equality' and the work of the school (2016, p. 301 Neary (2013;, and Fahie (2016;. For an account of questions relating to queer teachers in schooling more generally, see, for instance, the works of Griffin (1991;992), Khayatt (1992), Woods and Harbeck (1992), Nias (1996), Epstein and Johnson (1996), Rofes (2000), Kehily (2002), Gowran (2004), Jackson (2007), Ferfolja (2008), Gray (2013, and Connell (2015). ...
... It is not surprising then that LGBT teachers frequently report that significant energy, on top of an already demanding role, is needed to compartmentalize their personal and professional selves, vigilantly, and tentatively navigating the complexities of their heteronormative school communities and trying to remain as invisible as possible (Ferfolja, 2007). Invisibility in the school workplace is of course not conducive to job promotion (Rudoe, 2010) and many LGBT teachers avoid school leadership roles altogether. ...
Article
Full-text available
The recent school gate protests about the inclusion of LGBT identities in the curriculum suggest that sexual identity remains an issue of moral panic in UK schools. Given this current climate, and the legacy of Section 28, schools have rarely been easy workplaces for LGBT teachers. For LGBT teachers, significant energy and vigilance is required then to navigate the heteronormative and cis-normative staffroom and classroom. There is evidence that LGBT teachers try to remain as invisible as possible in their schools so as to not draw attention to themselves (Lee, 2019a). Some avoid promotion to school leadership roles fearing that the status will necessitate greater personal scrutiny by school stakeholders. Based on key attributes including, reading people, compassion, and commitment to the inclusion of others, making connections managing uncertainty, courage, and risk-taking, this perspective piece argues that some of the strategies LGBT teachers deploy to manage the intersection of personal and professional identities in school equip them with an array of particular skills that are conducive to excellent school leadership.
Article
This article explores the relational becomings of girls, feminism, femininity and the schooling environment. Drawing on feminist new materialisms and affect theory, it conceptualises femininity and feminism as emerging through dynamic material-discursive assemblages of sensations, bodies, things, ideas and practices. These assemblages derive from a study conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand examining girls’ engagements with the school ball; a practice deeply entangled with traditional norms of femininity and heterosexuality. Verbal and embodied fragments from study participants, feminist theory and ideas are diffractively read through one another to see what ripples, connections and questions might emerge. I consider how a relational approach shifts understandings of feminism and femininity away from pre-existing, self-contained entities or identities, towards thinking about the specificities through which they emerge. This perspective offers nuanced understandings of the relations in-between girls, femininity and feminism that avoid judgements based on binary logic (e.g. good/bad, feminist/not feminist), and instead, helps do justice to the lively and multifaceted nature of feminism, femininities and girls’ lives.
Article
Comprehensive Sexuality Education is vital in educating youth about gender and sexuality diversity, and yet there has been a growing debate about including LGBTIQ+ content. Using focus group interviews with 11 cisheterosexual school-attending youth in Cape Town, South Africa, this article considers their accounts of whether and how cisheteronormativity features in their sexuality education curriculum. The participants’ responses are a mixed bag, indicating that while they appear to support their LGBTIQ+ peers and an inclusive sexuality education curriculum, there is little recognition of how cisgender and heterosexual privilege features in schooling. The paper concludes that cisheteronormative structures, discourses, and practices have deep roots that mediate and continue to shape the teaching and learning of sexuality education, ensuring that schools remain as normative spaces that enable just straight bodies to extend into them.
Article
The problematics of social and academic participation for gender diverse and lgbtqi + youth in school communities is highlighted by the stigmatising relational dynamics which often become the dominant narrative in educational domains. This paper discusses the creation of a critical literacy/media product which arose from a year 7 level curriculum project in which students were invited to seek solutions to address a problem about which they cared. In 2021 a group of Australian secondary school students undertook an investigation into gender diversity and lgbtqi + inclusion. In partnership with teachers and pre-service teachers they co-designed an animation on gender identity opening up wider discussion of ‘orientations and dispositions’ and generating critique around issues of social justice, democracy, equality and inclusion in and out of the classroom.
Article
Like all young people (YP), those who are gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) spend their youth exploring and discovering their identities; but unlike their peers, they must consider whether, how, and when to disclose their GSD identity to others in a dynamic process of visibility management (VM). At school, GSD YP actively test social reactions, interpret attitudes, and assess safety, ultimately seeking belonging as their authentic selves. Our systematic review explored findings from 16 qualitative studies capturing GSD YPs experiences of managing visibility in schools internationally. Data were thematically synthesized, and seven themes were constructed. The process of visibility management is fluid, a negotiation with social norms that GSD YP's very existence transgresses. YP search for, and through activism actively shape, accepting environments in which they can safely be their authentic selves. GSD YP are actively asking school staff for help in creating open communities where all YP can find a place to belong, to fight to be visible. We offer some suggestions for how we might begin.
Chapter
This chapter focuses on LGBTQ+ Inclusion and Queer Pedagogy in Literacy Education in the US over the last 30 years. Given this specific field and focus, highlights include foundational scholars and how the field continues to grow. The chapter begins with background on cis/heteronormativity and taken-for-granted assumptions about gender and sexual identities. An overview of pedagogical approaches to LGBTQ+ inclusion and queer pedagogy is provided. The chapter then moves into teacher ideologies and finally teacher preparation. This chapter highlights work that educators have already been doing with nudges for areas to grow.KeywordsLGBTQ+ inclusionQueer pedagogyLiteracy educationHeteronormativity
Chapter
Full-text available
Gender and sexuality are key aspects of identity that intersect with other social categories such as race, class, ethnicity, and ability to shape life experiences. While these forces are at work throughout one's lifetime, adolescence is a particularly important time of discovery, negotiation, and resistance. Most young people in Western countries spend an enormous amount of time in schools, grouped together by age with others from their communities, including teachers and other school personnel. Schools are, therefore, important sites of sociality where young people are faced with the social and power dynamics of belonging, inclusion, and exclusion. The forms these processes take include forming friendships and romantic relationships as well as bullying and violence. Gender and sexuality are central to how these dynamics play out. Young people who do not conform to dominant binary versions of gendered expressions of femininity and masculinity as well as heterosexuality often encounter barriers to inclusion and recognition. Social relations among youth are central, but school curriculum, policies, teacher-student interactions, and how schools are physically organized all contribute to the shape that gender and sexuality will take in a particular context or location. Beyond the official curriculum, schools are sites where an unofficial curriculum of the body, gender performance, and gendered and sexed relations is learned through interactions with others and through encounters with powerful regimes of normativity. Young people are social agents who are actively involved in negotiating their gendered and sexed identities. However, they do so within the constraints of the discourses available to them to make meaning of their experience.
Article
Inclusive school environments have been shown to improve educational outcomes, retention, mental health and overall wellbeing for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) students. Anti-bullying approaches have been common strategies used in schools to promote safety for all students, yet a well-established critique among scholars and educators suggests such approaches by themselves are insufficient. Little research exists investigating the spatial aspects of forming LGBTQ-inclusive school cultures. This article reports on an Australian study exploring teachers’ and school staff understandings of how space influences inclusion and how they negotiateed or established ‘safe spaces’ for LGBTQ students. Drawing on the work of Edward Soja, we explored how participants constituted safety in conceived and perceived spaces, and how this informed the ways in which physical environments were established in the lived space to promote inclusion. We reveal the role of physical, discursive and curriculum spaces in everyday schooling activities and practices to promote LGBTQ inclusion.
Book
By exploring the material-discursive production of gender norms, this book takes a feminist posthuman new materialist standpoint that questions how schoolgirls materialize as pre-determined with educational space and place. An argument is developed on how gender and race inequity is produced through erasure of what has not yet been imagined and by a failure to recognize student potential that is not yet determinate. The volume presents a mapping of student re/accounts of everyday experiences undergone in Australian secondary schools as first and foremost affective accounts. Student negotiations with prescriptive processes of subject participation and subject selection are explored to illustrate how inequities are systematically brought into existence and include an examination of the making of STEM subject fields as entitled male space. Engaging theoretically with concepts from performative feminist new materialism and affect theory, the text maps filmic semblances created as part of an onto-epistemological project, and features chapters that call for alternative educational encounters which affirmatively acknowledge difference and promote non-binary thinking. This text will benefit researchers, academics, and educators with an interest in gender and sexuality education, teacher education, STEM education, gender inequality, intersectionality, and the sociology of education. Those interested in gender studies, affect theory and feminist theory, as well as educational policy and politics more broadly will also benefit from this book.
Article
Full-text available
Lake level change is the variation of water level and size of lakes which results from the shifting of water balance from its normal state. This fluctuation disturbs the stability and suitability of ecosystems which seriously affects the life of plants and animals. The main purpose of this project is to know which lakes show significant water level change and quantify the amount of surface area change from year to year. To achieve this objective, I used multi-temporal satellite image analysis using 10-year interval starting from 1973-2019 which means 46 years back by using TM, MSS and OLI sensors.
Article
Full-text available
32 keâuee mejes Jej-Je<e&-24-meb KÙee-2-2021 ceje"er ef MeJeYeòeâ ÛeVeekeâer ef nb oer jÛeveeÙes  Øee0[e@ 0 ØeJeer Ce keâejb pekeâj 'kks /k lkj f'koHkä pUukIik okjn ejkBh Hkkf"kd Fks A ij mUgks us fga nh jpuk;s jph bZ ldkj.k mudk ejkBh lkfgR; es fof'k"B LFkku curk gS A mUgks us nks gjs uked jpuk;s fga nh es dh] bu jpukvks ij dchj vkS j rq ylhnkl dk çHkko fn[kkbZ ns rk gS A nks gjs uked fga nh jpuk;s la LFkk es de gS ija rq mudh vkokgd {kerk vf/kd gS A bu jpuk vkS ij mifu'kn vkS j xhrk dk çHkko Hkh fn[kkbZ ns rk gS A bu fga nh jpukvks es lq yHkrk gS A çklknhdrk gS A vkS j de ls de ejkBh 'kCnks dk mi;ks x gS A viuk fopkj Fkks Ms 'kCnks es O;ä djus dh {kerk mues Fkh viuh jpukvks es mUgks us euq "; dks bZ 'oj dk Lej.k djus vkS j bl HkkS rhd txr ls nq j jgus dk mins 'k dh;k gS A mudk la lkj dh vkS j ns [kus dk-"Vhdks .k lHkh la rks dh rjg mukläh dk Fkk A la lkj eR;Z gS vkS j vkRek vej bl fy;s ges eR;Z ftou dks R;kxdj vius eq y Lo:i vFkkZ r vkRek:i es foyhu gks rk gS ;gh fopkj mUgks us viuh fga nh jpukvks es çdV fd;k gS A f'koHkä doh pUuk dh jpuk;s euq "; dks uS frd deks Z dk Lej.k djkrh gS A HkkS rhd ftou es bZ 'oj dk foLej ugh gks uk pkfg;s ;g crkrh gS A euq "; dk vius dehZ ds vk/kkj ij Qy çkIrh gks rh gS bldh vkS j mldk /;ku f[kprh gS A euq "; dks lndehZ ds ekxZ ij pyus dk mins 'k djrh gS A ftou dh {k.kHka xq jrk crkrh gS A 'kCn lw ph 1½ eq "kZ n& bZ 'oj 3½eks {k&eq äh 5½ y{k&,dkxr 2½ okV&ekxZ 4½iS y&fdukjk 6½ mej&ftou mifu"kn & v}S r fopkj çLrkouk& ejkBh foj'kS o f'koHkä doh pUukIik dh fga nh jpuk, egRoiw .kZ gS A mudk iq jkuke pUuIik okjn Fkk A egkjk"Vª ds ^^ejkBokMk** ¼1½ Hkkx es mudk tUe gq ok Fkk A muds tUeo"kZ vkS j eR;q o"kZ ds fo"k; es dq N miyC/k ugh A mudh jpuk es loZ çFke o"kZ 1926 es çdkf'kr dh x;h A mudh jpukvs es ejkBh vHka x] ejkBh ins ] ejkBh Hkk:Ms ] ejkBh vkjrh] buds lkFk lkFk fga nh nks gjs vkS j fga nh vHka x Hkh gS A o"kZ 1926 es çdkf'kr bu jpuk vks dh i"B la [;k 358 Fkh A pUukIik ds fga nh jpuk vks ds ckjs es mudh jpuk ;s ^^dchj** ¼2½ ds nks gks dk Lej.k djkrh gS xw lk dgk x;k gS A mUgks us iq jk.k xz a Fk] ^^mikZ u"kn** ¼3½ xhrk vkS j foj'kS o /kehZ ;ks ds ejkBh vkS j la L-r xz a Fkks dk v/;;u fd;k Fkk A vkS j blh v/;;u dk çfrfca /k muds ejkBh vkS j fga nh jpuk vks es çfrr gks rk gS A mudh fga nh jpuk, la r dchj vkS j la r rq ylhnkl ds lkfgR; dk v/;;u dh vkS j funs Z 'k djkrh gS A f'koHkä pUukIik okjn ds viuh jpukvks a es a eu ij fu;a =.k] mifu"knks dkv}S r fopkj] HkkS rhd txr dh vkläh] ukeHkäh] euq "; tUe dh nq yZ Hkrk] L=h fo"k;d-"Vhdks .k bR;knh fo"k;hij Nks Vh Nks Vh fga nh jpuk;s dj ds viuk vk/;kfRed-"Vhdks .k O;ä dh;k gS A ikja ikjhd la rks dh HkkS frd txr ds fo"k; es tks /kkj.kk Fkk ogh /kkj.kk f'koHkä pUuk dh Fkh 7  ßeer meeF& yeeyee uees keâØeyees Oeve keâuee cene0 Je[ves j, ef pe JeOee& .
Article
Drawing on a critical discourse analysis of policy documents and textbooks, this paper contributes to the growing field of research on the role of schools and schooling with regards to the construction of gender and sexuality by focusing on school practices and educational spaces. We argue that the nation-state in the Islamic Republic of Iran is a religious biopolitical state and its official discourse in the realm of gender and sexuality relies on heteronormative as well as gender normative belief systems. School spaces are therefore constituted as strongly heteronormative, and non-heterosexuality is not recognised as a legitimate subject position. Through its everyday practices, the education system upholds the state’s ideology, by which the ideal/normal student is read as being heterosexual and cisgender, adhering to Islamic/state values, and constituted on the axis of strict gender binaries. Education about sexuality-gender diversity is therefore excluded and/or silenced. This paper aims to explore school discourses and practices in terms of gender and sexuality and how schools construct and regulate sexual and gender identities, with the aim of producing the ideal Islamic/Iranian subject.
Article
Online communities provide spaces for people who are vulnerable and underserved to seek support and build community, such as LGBTQ+ people. Today, some online community spaces are mediated by algorithms. Scholarship has found that algorithms have become deeply embedded in the systems that mediate our routine engagements with the world. Yet, little is known about how these systems impact those who are most vulnerable in society. In this paper, we focus on people's everyday experiences with one algorithmic system, the short video sharing application TikTok. TikTok recently received press that it was suppressing and oppressing the identities of its growing LGBTQ+ user population through algorithmic and human moderation of LGBTQ+ creators and content related to LGBTQ+ identity. Through an interview study with 16 LGBTQ+ TikTok users, we explore people's everyday engagements and encounters with the platform. We find that TikTok's For You Page algorithm constructs contradictory identity spaces that at once support LGBTQ+ identity work and reaffirm LGBTQ+ identity, while also transgressing and violating the identities of individual users. We also find that people are developing self-organized practices in response to these transgressions and violations. We discuss the implications of algorithmic systems on people's identity work, and introduce the concept of algorithmic exclusion, and explore how people are building resilience following moments of algorithmic exclusion.
Book
We are almost programmed into thinking of our sexuality as a wholly natural feature of life. But sexual relations are but one form of social relations, as Jeffrey Weeks makes clear in his book. Drawing on the analyses of Michel Foucault, amongst others, the book examines the social, moral and political issues raised by contemporary forms of sexuality. Weeks provides an authoritative introduction to the sociology of sexuality, discussing its cultural and socio-historical construction, it's relationship with power and the State's involvement in its rationalisation and regulation. This second edition is also updates to include global and postcolonial perspectives on sexuality, queer theory, the internet and cybersex, AIDS as a global phenomenon and international debates on the politics of sexuality. This book is an indispensable introduction to this complex and expanding field.
Article
This article, based on the author's doctoral research, examines the ways in which some religious schools in New South Wales (NSW), via institutional practices, maintain and perpetuate discrimination in relation to lesbian teachers and lesbian sexualities. These institutional practices, which included threats of dismissal, forced resignations, implicit harassment, monitoring and surveillance, curriculum silences, and censorship, silence lesbian sexualities and impact the teacher's daily operations and freedom of speech. Vicarious witnessing of these forms of punishment (in the Foucauldian sense) further ensures the silencing of lesbian identities. Moreover, statewide anti-discrimination legislation, which excludes some private institutions from compliance in the area of sexuality, serves to reinforce discriminatory practices, and ultimately silenced the various violence perpetuated against many of the participants in this research.
Article
This paper explores the multiplicity of ways in which lesbian physical education students and teachers construct and manage their respective identities within higher education and the schooling system in England. Attention is directed towards the politics of New Right discourses on sexuality and in particular to the prohibition of homosexuality and the passing of Section 28 of the Local Government Act in England and Wales in 1988 which created a climate of fear of loss of employment for many lesbian and gay teachers. Through the analysis of in‐depth interviews and questionnaires the lives of white, able‐bodied lesbian physical education students and teachers are explored. Narratives are utilised to illustrate how many are forced to comply with dominant discourses of hegemonic heterosexuality in order to ‘safely’ negotiate what for them is often an intolerant and hostile world. In concluding it is argued that sexual boundaries are fluid and that we need to construct a counter discourse to examine and challenge the privileging of heterosexuality.
Article
Lesbian women's experiences of education frequently occurs within a contradictory public relationship: their identity ‘woman’ is usually ‘visible’ whilst their identity ‘lesbian’ remains generally ‘invisible’ ‐ both in educational settings and within wider educational discourses. By drawing upon examples of self‐understanding of lesbian identity this paper discusses the meanings and connections between these two identities from the perspectives of lesbian women themselves. The inclusion of self‐understanding of lesbian identity as a central feature in exploring the relationship of lesbian women and education permits a discussion of both lesbian oppression and lesbian agency. I will discuss this with reference to my recent study of lesbian women and education. The inclusion of self‐understanding of lesbian identity illuminates the complex relationships which exist between individual identity meanings and those which are socially constructed and maintained within an educational system based upon the ideology of heterosexism.
Article
This paper reflects on the issues that arise when pre-service teachers are introduced to lesbian and gay concerns in schooling. It explores pre-service teachers' resistance and their commonly espoused attitudes and beliefs, as well as the difficulties faced by teacher educators in challenging the myths, stereotypes and biases that exist in university classrooms. The paper highlights the perceived (ir)relevance of gay and lesbian issues to pre-service teachers, the belief that sexuality is not the concern of teachers or schools, pre-service teachers' assumption of 'compulsory heterosexuality' in both the university and school classrooms, and the pathologising of perceived lesbian and gay identities as the cause of individual discrimination. Such beliefs may pose numerous pedagogical, professional and personal concerns for the teacher educator. The need to address gay and lesbian issues with pre-service teachers is paramount in the light of the homophobic violence, vilification and discrimination experienced by individuals in schools.
Article
In this condensed version of her book, Sedgwick reflects about the "closet" as a regime of regulation of gay and lesbian lives that is also important to heterosexuals since it guarantees their privileges. Sedgwick affirms the "closet", or the "open secret", has been basic to lesbian/gay life for the last century even after Stonewall (1969). She also states that this regime - with its contradictory and constraining rules and limits about privacy and disclosure, public and private, knowledge and ignorance – has served to shape the way in which many questions about values and epistemology were comprehended in the Western Society as a whole.
Article
Preface. Acknowledgements. Introduction: What is Social Constructionism? Where Do You Get Your Personality From? Does Language Affect the Way We Think? What is a Discourse? What Does it Mean to Have Power? Is There a Real World Outside Discourse? Can Individuals Change Society? What Does it Mean to be a Person? 1. The Person as Discourse-user. 2. The Self as Constructed in Language. 3. Subject Positions in Discourse. What Do Discourse Analysts Do? Glossary. Bibliography. Name Index. Subject Index.
Article
Families headed by lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender parents are often invisible in or underserved by the school systems. To create important school-home partnerships, schools need to become better informed about these families, including the wide variety of family constellations they comprise, the social obstacles they face, and the reasons why a functional parent may be excluded or remain invisible when the family presents itself. Homophobic views, religious beliefs, traditional ideas about gender categories, and heterosexist assumptions may contribute to a school professional's discomfort addressing these issues. Resistance also may stem from lack of information about these families, lack of experience and comfort speaking about sexual minority issues in general, a mistaken equation of sexual orientation with sexual behavior, and lack of specific training in how to speak to children about these issues. Additionally, school professionals may fear that being affirmative on sexual minority-parented family issues will expose them to administrative criticism or objections from heterosexual parents. The use of anti-bias and informational training, new curricula, liaisons to outside organizations, and official policy guidelines from school administrations are discussed.
Article
This paper reports on findings from research currently in progress that examines anti‐ homophobia education in teacher education courses across New South Wales, Australia. Focusing on one aspect of the broader study, the discussion explores why teacher educators generally considered the incorporation of anti‐homophobia perspectives as important to teacher education as well as the various discourses in which these issues were located. It also highlights the changing discursive locations that frame the incorporation of anti‐ homophobia education across the early childhood, primary and secondary sectors as well as demonstrating how broader sociocultural discourses influence teacher educators' perceptions of the relevance and importance of these issues to teacher training.
Article
This article examines the homophobic harassment of lesbian teachers working in government high schools in Sydney, Australia. Six women were interviewed about their experiences of student homophobia, including how they dealt with that harassment on both a personal and practical level and their philosophies on youth homophobia and anti-homophobic education in New South Wales government schools. The article demonstrates the fact that harassment based on sexual orientation is often an invisible issue in schools, as is homosexuality in general. It also demonstrates that there is inadequate training of staff and too few resources available to enhance tolerance of homosexuality. It shows that teaching about homosexual tolerance needs to be an 'en masse' strategy, where the issue of homosexuality and anti-homophobia strategies are not categorised under any broad umbrella term, but where they are prioritised to become visible, overtly discussed and hence, addressed issues.
Article
This paper presents findings of a study that examined the results of tenure and legal protection on lesbian, gay male, and bisexual public school teachers. Specifically, it describes the effect of tenure, state laws, inclusive contracts, and local ordinances on the openness and public identities of gay teachers. A total of 904 out of 1,400 lesbian, homosexual male, and bisexual teachers completed a survey. Of these, 611 were contacted through lesbian and gay teacher organizations and 289 acquaintances were contacted through the members of these organizations. Findings indicate that tenure had a strong negative influence on issues related to job satisfaction. Tenure did not appear to provide protection or an avenue to openness about the respondents' sexual preference. The data raised two further questions: (1) Why did tenure fail to provide the expected increase in teacher openness about their sexual identities? and (2) Why were respondents largely uninformed about their civil rights? To answer these questions, 11 respondents, none of whom were explicitly "out" in their schools, were contacted for follow-up interviews. They reported that they were not open about their sexual identities because of the fear of professional, social, and physical reprisals. In conclusion, homophobia drives many qualified and talented teachers away from teaching. Those who stay must constantly attend to the prospect of exposure with all its consequences. The wider implication is that any teacher, straight or gay, who holds and expresses unpopular views may experience fear and isolation. Fourteen tables and an appendix containing 27 interview narratives are included. (LMI)
Article
This report describes identity management strategies used in school by lesbian and gay educators. Participants in the study were 13 self‐identified lesbian and gay educators who worked in preschool‐12th‐grade settings. Each participant was interviewed about her or his experience of being a lesbian or gay educator. Researchers and participants analyzed the interview transcripts to identify themes of experience. Participants chose identity management strategies that addressed either their fear of exposure or their wish for self‐integrity. The identity management strategies used by participants comprise a continuum from low to high risk: (a) passing, (b)covering, (c) implicidy coming out, and (d) explicitly coming out. The results are presented in the context of contemporary labeling theory and critical feminist theory.
Article
The geographies of civil risk human rights and social justice in relation to a pluralist notion of justice lie at the heart of this paper We define civil risk as a failure of human rights, brought about by institutional processes constructed over time, space and place, which create disadvantages for marginalized social groups. Geography is integral both to civil risk and social justice because marginalization is a spatial process articulated through the deployment of institutional power across space to create socially constructed differences between dominant and subordinate groups. In this respect, we emphasize that rights are constructed in relation to dominant interests, and not according to the conditions of risk that give rise to marginalized individuals and groups. Drawing on research in social theory that emphasizes the importance of positionality and social difference, the paper argues that a principle of risk rather than rights must motivate social justice. We examine distinct forms Of marginalization in Canada - gender, sexual orientation, 'race' and aboriginal status - to illustrate the importance of the historica-geographical context of marginalization and the paradoxical nature of the relationship between risk and rights. In considering these forms of marginality and their landscapes, we argue the need for a pluralist notion of justice that will explicitly take positionality into account in achieving equality rights, reducing civil risk and mediating shared spaces.
Article
This article, based on empirical qualitative data gained from a survey and interviews with a group of early childhood educators, argues for the inclusion of sexual differences, or more specifically, gay and lesbian equity issues, in approaches to anti-bias. The article examines the discourses that prevail in the field, that perpetuate the perceived irrelevance, invisibility and exclusion of lesbian and gay issues in early childhood settings and education generally. The discussion focuses on several main areas, including: the prevalence of the dominant discourses of childhood and sexuality that intersect to constitute sexuality as irrelevant to children; the pervasiveness of the discourse of compulsory heterosexuality and the assumed absence of gay and lesbian families in settings; or the assumed absence of significant gay and lesbian adults in children's lives; the presence of homophobia and heterosexism in early childhood settings; and the perceived irrelevance of broader social, political and economic issues to the ‘child's world’. This article highlights some crucial issues for practice and policy development in the area of anti-bias education concerned with sexual differences.
Article
Theoretical understanding of the meaning of the term violence is underdeveloped. This paper examines the question of how violence to the person is socially defined, and in particular how understandings of violence are both gendered and sexualised. It highlights how victim characteristics, as well as the social and interactional contexts in which violence occurs, influence interpretative frameworks, with specific reference to the binary distinction between the public and private and to notions of culpability and victimisation. This entails a consideration of the social meanings which constitute notions of a ‘person’ with a ‘right to life’ and occupation of ‘public space’. The importance of the victim/perpetrator dichotomy in theorising violence is also considered. These themes and issues are examined in relation to a relatively new area of study; the case example of public violence towards lesbians and gay men.
Article
Physical education is a profession where heterosexuality has historically been regarded as normal, if not compulsory. The location of female physical education (PE) teachers at the nexus of discourses about masculinist sport, women's physical education and pedagogies of the body has exerted unique historical pressures on their sexualities. In North America and Western Europe, female PE teachers have frequently been suspected of being lesbian. This suspicion has enveloped lesbian teachers in a shroud of oppressive silence, tolerated only as an 'open secret' (Cahn, 1994). This study examined the life histories of six women from three generations who had taught physical education in western Canada. Previous life history research has focused exclusively on lesbian PE teachers (Clarke, 1996; Sparkes, 1992, 1994a, 1994b; Squires & Sparkes, 1996; Sparkes & Templin, 1992) which risk reinforcing a hierarchical relationship between 'lesbian' and 'heterosexual'. Accordingly, three women who identified as 'lesbian' and three as 'married' or 'heterosexual' were involved in this study which incorporated poststructural, psychoanalytic and queer theories about sexual subjectivity into a feminist approach to life history. The notions of 'understanding' and 'overstanding' were used to analyze data which meant interpreting not only what had been said during the interviews but also what was left unsaid. The women's life histories revealed how lesbian sexualities have been marginalized and silenced, especially within the physical education profession. All the women grew up in families where heterosexuality was normalized, and all except one experienced pressure to date boys during their high school education in Canada. As teachers, identifying as a 'feminist' had a greater effect on their personal politics and approaches to teaching than their sexual identities. The life histories also provided limited support to the notion that PE teacher's participation in various women's sports accentuated the suspicion of lesbianism. For two of the 'lesbian' women, team sports continued to provide valuable lesbian communities from the 1950s to the present day. In contrast, one 'lesbian' woman established her lesbian social network through individual sports and urban feminist groups. The 'heterosexual' women had all participated in gender-neutral sports. Overall the sporting backgrounds of these teachers did little to dispel the long-standing association between women's sports and lesbianism which, in tum, has affected female PE teachers. Drawing on queer theory and the notion of 'overstanding' data, deconstructive interpretations suggested how heterosexuality had been normalized in several institutional discourses within women's physical education. These interpretations undermined the boundaries of 'the closet', sought out an absent lesbian gaze and suggested that homophobia has been, in part, rooted in the social unconscious of the physical education profession. System requirements: Adobe Acrobat reader. Mode of access: World Wide Web. Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of British Columbia, 1998. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 202-222). Electronic reproduction. q
Article
Photocopy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 2000. Includes bibliographical references (p. 256-268).
Article
The purposes of this participatory research project were to describe the experiences of thirteen lesbian and gay educators and to empower the participants through collective reflection and action. Each participant was interviewed and given a copy of her or his audio-tape and transcript. Using these materials, each participant developed a profile of themselves to share with the other participants. During a series of group meetings that spanned fifteen months, participants discussed their experiences, searched for common themes, and planned two collective actions. This chapter describes the professional experiences of these lesbian and gay educators and the process of empowerment that changed their lives.
Article
This study summarized a survey of 97 homosexual individuals who were currently teaching or who had been teachers. The focus of the survey was to gain insight into the experiences of such individuals in the public schools. It was found that 25% of the respondents had left teaching; a little more than half of this group left at least partially because of their sexual preference. About 82% were out of the closet to at least one person while teaching; nearly half of those who were "out" had chosen another teacher in whom to confide. Of those who chose someone in whom to confide, 70% reported a positive reaction from that individual. The author's conclusion is that an individual's decision to become a teacher, stay in teaching, and to "come out of the closet" is necessarily highly individual and very complex.
S(h)ifting the terms of hetero/sexism: gender, power, homophobias) Homophobia. How we all pay the price
  • A Pellegrini
Pellegrini, A. (1992) S(h)ifting the terms of hetero/sexism: gender, power, homophobias, in: W. J. Blumenfeld (Ed.) Homophobia. How we all pay the price (Boston, MA, Beacon).
Mechanisms of silence: sexuality regulation in NSW high schools. Perspectives from lesbian teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
  • T Ferfolja
Ferfolja, T. (2003) Mechanisms of silence: sexuality regulation in NSW high schools. Perspectives from lesbian teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Where do you draw the line? Education and sexual identities Schooling and sexualities: teaching for a positive sexuality
  • L Beckett
Beckett, L. (1996) Where do you draw the line? Education and sexual identities, in: L. Laskey & C. Beavis (Eds) Schooling and sexualities: teaching for a positive sexuality (Geelong, Deakin Centre for Education and Change, Deakin University).
Sexuality and censorship in the curriculum Sexuality and the curriculum. The policies and practices of sexuality education
  • J A Whitson
Whitson, J. A. (1992) Sexuality and censorship in the curriculum, in: J. T. Sears (Ed.) Sexuality and the curriculum. The policies and practices of sexuality education (New York, NY, Teachers College Press).
Compulsory heterosexuality: schools and lesbian students Knowledge experience and ruling relations: studies in social organization of knowledge
  • D Khayatt
Khayatt, D. (1995). Compulsory heterosexuality: schools and lesbian students, in: M. Campbell & A. Manicom (Eds) Knowledge experience and ruling relations: studies in social organization of knowledge (Toronto, University of Toronto Press).
A practice focused approach to addressing heterosexist violence in Australian schools Schooling & sexualities: teaching for a positive sexuality
  • S Hinson
Hinson, S. (1996) A practice focused approach to addressing heterosexist violence in Australian schools, in: L. Laskey & C. Beavis (Eds) Schooling & sexualities: teaching for a positive sexuality (Victoria, Deakin Centre for Education and Change).
Thinking critically/intervening effectively about heterosexism and homophobia: a twenty-five year research retrospective Overcoming heterosexism and homophobia. Strategies that work
  • J T Sears
Sears, J. T. (1997) Thinking critically/intervening effectively about heterosexism and homophobia: a twenty-five year research retrospective, in: J. T. Sears & W. L. Williams (Eds) Overcoming heterosexism and homophobia. Strategies that work (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
Producer and Director) (1997) Out in the Bush
  • G Willison
Willison, G. (Producer and Director) (1997) Out in the Bush [Video] (Sydney, Rantan Productions).
Who are you kidding? Children, power, and the struggle against sexual abuse Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood
  • T Ferfolja
  • J Kitzinger
Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 13:48 29 August 2014 162 T. Ferfolja Kitzinger, J. (1990) Who are you kidding? Children, power, and the struggle against sexual abuse, in: A. James & A. Prout (Eds) Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (London, Falmer).
Dilemmas and possibilities of sexuality education. Reproducing the body poli-tic Sexuality and the curriculum. The politics and practices of sexuality educa-tion
  • J T Sears
Sears, J. T. (1992) Dilemmas and possibilities of sexuality education. Reproducing the body poli-tic, in: J. T. Sears (Ed.) Sexuality and the curriculum. The politics and practices of sexuality educa-tion (New York, NY, Teachers College Press).
Addressing systemic violence in education Systemic violence in education
  • Ross Epp
  • J Watkinson
Ross Epp, J. & Watkinson, A. M. (1997) Addressing systemic violence in education, in: J. Ross Epp & A. M. Watkinson (Eds) Systemic violence in education. Promise broken (New York, NY, State University of New York Press).
A reflection of resistance. Discourses of heterosexism and homophobia in teacher training classroomsEds) From here to diversity: the social impact of lesbian and gay issues in education in Australia and New Zealand
  • K H Robinson
  • T Ferfolja
Robinson, K. H. & Ferfolja, T. (2002) A reflection of resistance. Discourses of heterosexism and homophobia in teacher training classrooms, in: K. H. Robinson, J. Irwin & T. Ferfolja (Eds) From here to diversity: the social impact of lesbian and gay issues in education in Australia and New Zealand (New York, NY, Harrington Park).
Ideological conflict and change in the sexuality curriculum Sexuality and the curriculum. The policies and practices of sexuality education
  • D Carlson
Carlson, D. (1992) Ideological conflict and change in the sexuality curriculum, in: J. T. Sears (Ed.) Sexuality and the curriculum. The policies and practices of sexuality education (New York, NY, Teachers College Press).
It's elementary: talking about gay issues in schools [Video]
  • D Chasnoff
  • H Cohen
Chasnoff, D. & Cohen, H. (1997) It's elementary: talking about gay issues in schools [Video] (San Francisco, CA, Women's Educational Media).
Anti-lesbian/gay violence in schools
  • J Griffin
Griffin, J. (1997) Anti-lesbian/gay violence in schools, in: G. Mason & S. Tomsen (Eds) Homophobic violence (Sydney, Hawkins).
The Schoolwatch report. A study into anti-lesbian and gay harassment and violence in Australian schools
  • J Griffin
Griffin, J. (1994) The Schoolwatch report. A study into anti-lesbian and gay harassment and violence in Australian schools (Sydney, Suzanne Jones-Pritchard).
A practice focused approach to addressing heterosexist violence in Australian schools
  • S Hinson
  • L Laskey
  • C Beavis
  • Victoria