Experiments were carried out to study the management of entomofauna of cocoa through survey, monitoring, identification of insect pests using morphological and molecular tools, biology of sucking pests, predatory potential of natural enemies and to develop integrated pest management module against sucking pest complex of cocoa.
During survey, 23 species of insect pests and 13 species of natural enemies were documented. Among the insect pests, 14, 2 and 7 species were sucking pests, borers and defoliators, respectively. Among the natural enemies, 7 species of predators and 6 species of parasitoids were documented on different insect pests of cocoa.
The highest number of aphids (178 per top three leaves per tree) was recorded during tenth standard week and the lowest (99.2) during forty-fifth standard week. Population of mealybugs was recorded to be the maximum (361 per three pods per tree) during ninth standard week and minimum (135.40) during forty-fourth standard week. The highest number of tea mosquito bugs (12 per three pods per tree) was recorded during forty-fourth standard week and the lowest (0.8) during fifth standard week. The highest number of aphids (15.21 per week) was trapped on yellow sticky light traps followed by blue sticky light traps (12.71) as against the lowest in red sticky light traps (5.52).
Abundance of aphids and mealybugs was positively correlated with maximum temperature and negatively correlated with minimum temperature. Population of tea mosquito bugs was positively correlated with relative humidity.
As per morphological identification report, tea mosquito bugs documented were identified as, Helopeltis bradyi, H.antonii, mealybugs as Planococcus citri, Paracoccus marginatus, Pseudococcus longispinus, Dysmicoccus brevipes and Rastrococcus iceryoides, aphids as Toxoptera aurantii and Aphis gossypii, planthoppers as Pochazia sp., Eurybrachis tomentosa and Proutista moesta, scale insect as Icerya aegyptiaca, cowbug as Telingana sp., pod borer as Dichocrocis punctiferalis, bark eating caterpillar as Inderbala sp., hairy caterpillars as Dasychira moerens, Euproctis fraterna, Olene mendosa and tortricid (unidentified), ash weevil as Myllocerus sp., bagworms as psychid (unidentified) and grasshopper as Diabolocatantops sp. Predators in cocoa ecosystem were morphologically identified as Cheilomenus sexmaculata, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, Spalgis epeus, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi, Humbertiella sp., syrphids (unidentified), Argiope anasuja and parasitoids as Promusidea unfasciativentris, Leptomastix tsukumiensis, Aenasius sp., encyrtid parasitoid (unidentified), Acerophagus papayae and eurytomid parasitoid (unidentified).
Molecular identification of sucking pests of cocoa revealed that specimens 1, 2, 3 and 4 were identified as Helopeltis bradyi, H.antonii (Miridae), Paracoccus marginatus (Pseudococcidae) and Icerya purchasi (Monophlebidae).
Biology of sucking pests of cocoa revealed that the duration of first, second, third and fourth instar nymphs of T. aurantii was 1.45±0.43, 2.15±0.47, 2.35±0.51 and 2.05±0.37 days, respectively with a reproductive capacity of 52.17±4.19 nymphs in 4.40±0.40 days and adult longevity was 12.10±1.29 days. Regarding P. citri, the egg period, duration of first, second and third instar nymphs was 3.50±0.50, 5.17±0.29, 6.17±0.58 and 7.33±0.29 days, respectively with pupal period of 4.83±0.76 days. Total life cycle of male was 29.50±1.50 days and 41.50±1.80 days for females. The egg period, duration of first, second and third instar nymphs of P. marginatus was 6.50±0.87, 3.67±0.58, 3.92±0.39 and 4.58±0.40 days, respectively with the pupal period of 3.25±0.43 days. Total life cycle was found to be 23.58±1.87 days for males and 39.17±1.04 days for females. Regarding H. bradyi, the egg period, duration of first, second, third, fourth and fifth instar nymphs was 7.54±0.46, 1.60±0.42, 1.10±0.22, 1.24±0.18, 1.88±0.40 and 2.52±0.36 days, respectively. Total life cycle was 38.08±1.59 days for males and 41.88±1.11 days for females. The oviposition period of adult female was 21.80±0.84 days with the fecundity of 137.60±1.82 eggs.
Predatory potential of natural enemies revealed that third and fourth instar grubs of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri were voracious and consumed 278.60±5.81, 88.00±2.74, 48.80±2.59 and 389.20±4.97, 124.20±2.59 and 56.40±4.83 first, second and third instar nymphs of P. citri and 2.60±0.55, 38.20±2.86, 20.80±0.84 and 3.40±0.44, 62.60±5.77 and 25.80±1.30 ovisacs, nymphs and adults of P. marginatus, respectively. Second and third instar larvae of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi were voracious and consumed 224.40±4.14, 69.20±3.27, 41.00±3.16 and 326.60±2.96, 116.20 ±6.45 and 97.40±2.05 first, second and third instar nymphs of P. citri, respectively and 2.20±0.45, 128.80±2.77, 19.40±2.88 and 3.60±0.55, 213.80±8.84 and 27.40±3.13 ovisacs, nymphs and adults of P. marginatus, respectively.
IPM module was significantly superior over farmer’s practice and untreated control in checking the population of aphids, mealybugs and tea mosquito bug with the mean per cent reduction of 91.1, 94.0 and 84.4 over untreated control, respectively. Untreated control was significantly superior in conserving the population of natural enemies followed by IPM module.
Maximum number of harvestable pods, pod length, pod girth and pod weight was recorded in IPM plot followed by farmer’s practice. Maximum number of beans per pod, wet and dry bean weight, dry bean yield per tree per season were recorded in IPM plot followed by farmer’s practice. IPM module was found to be statistically superior over farmer’s practice and untreated control in terms of protection and pod and bean yield parameters.