ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Since the 1995 bombing of the Alfred R. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, academics and the general public have shown increased interest in white racial extremist and other right-wing radical groups. The interest in understanding any form of extreme intolerance requires locating the historical development of the ideas, beliefs, and actions espoused through the legislation of miscegenation in our nation's history and by extremist organizations. A chronology, used as a teaching tool, reviews the unique strands of extreme beliefs and actions and connects these understandings to the growth of racialist and extremist ideologies in the United States. This timeline provides a tool for instructors and other interested individuals in gaining an understanding of such groups by locating key developments within the laws as well as within the white racial extremist movement. Thus this chronology focuses on legislative acts and Supreme Court decisions that mirror our nation's early white racialist history. Additionally, this timeline also provides information about other social movement forces that may have affected the white racial extremist movement.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
... "The land owning citizen warrior…wearing a ceremonial sword at his local government assembly illustrates the perfect vision of our own founding fathers held for America" (McClaughry 1986:70). Closely tied to the revolutionary perspective is the insurrectionist perspective: the right of the people to bear arms is to defend against government tyranny (Becker et al. 2001;Horwitz and Anderson 2009). The distinction lies between the right of the people to overthrow an unelected monarchy vs the people engaging in violence against a perceived illegitimate government that is supposed to be drawn from the body of the peoples. ...
... Limitations. Because New Warrior culture provides the cultural meaning of the government as corrupt and therefore irredeemable, it enables the legitimation of the insurrectionist perspective, that it is the duty of the people to overthrow a government if it becomes tyrannical (Becker et al. 2001). Understanding how the NRA used "shared cultural identities" for "political advantage" (Strauss et al. 1997:24) offers insight into how cultural change occurs through changing moral meaning (Tiryakian 1967) transmitted by stories and narrative (Tilly 2002). ...
Article
Full-text available
The emergence of New Warrior culture in the post-Vietnam era has largely been unexplored by sociology of culture. While recent research on the NRA has explored significant aspects of gun culture such as advertising, narratives, as well as ratings of gun empowerment etc., less work has investigated how the NRA facilitated changes not only in gun culture but in the “systems of social relations” between gun owners and the government but also in “systems of meaning” in how gun owners understand their guns. This paper argues that the NRA’s use of Native American warrior narratives, combined with other New Warrior narratives, maps onto Swidler’s unsettled time. Merging classic warrior narratives based in service to the nation alongside extensive use of Native American warriors, the NRA leveraged warrior narratives as a way of facilitating the transformation of warrior identity from one who defends the nation to one that is prepared to fight their government. In this way, the NRA was able to communicate antigovernment narratives without openly embracing the conspiratorial antigovernment ideals espoused by some factions of the militia movement by changing warrior cultural narratives from defending the nation to fighting against its government.
... The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) contends, the increase in right-wing anger by pockets of white America has been caused by "racial changes in the population demographics, soaring public debt and the terrible economy… and an array of initiatives by the relatively liberal Obama Administration that are seen as 'socialist' or even 'fascist'" (SPLC, 2010, p.41). As these concerns grow and as whites fear becoming a minority in the United States, other fears over the erosion of white privilege and power has created an environment where racist movements are gaining strength as institutionalized White Power erodes (BECKER; JIPSON; KATZ, 2001), leading to an increasing number of whites joining racist organizations as they see their dominant position in society as fading. By the year 2011 right wing hate groups had reached an all time high of 1,018 in the United States (SPLC, 2013). ...
... In the United States, skinheads and skinhead music, appeared in reaction to the American punk scene, but it was not until the mid-1980s when they began to be recruited by racist organizations including the White Aryan Resistance (WAR) founded by Tom Metzger in 1983(BLAZAK, 2001BECKER et al. 2001). By the late 1980s, hundreds of acts of violence were attributed to skinhead groups (BLAZAK, 2001). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study uses grounded theory to examine “hatecore” song lyrics used as a communication strategy to spread skinhead ideology. Results indicate that lyrics portray ethnic and religious minorities, and homosexuals as inferior and subhuman. Jews, the government and whites who oppose skinhead ideology are described as part of the problem. They are also used to recruit disenfranchised whites to the movement by defining them as disempowered and losing influence as “others” gain it as well as through positive messages of white racial pride. As with other social movements, results indicate that power plays a central role in defining the problem facing disenfranchised whites, the cause, and prescribing solutions found in hatecore song lyrics.
... In the mid-1980s in the United States, skinheads were recruited by extremist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan, the neo-Nazi group New Order, White Aryan Resistance, known as " WAR, " as well as groups such as Hammerskin Nation and Volksfront USA. While some racist skinheads joined these larger organizations , others claimed no official affiliation, making them harder for law enforcement to monitor (BECKER et al., 2001; BLAZAK , 2001). ...
... 7 The ATS, led by Distinguished Professor Brent Smith from University of Arkansas, has the distinction of being one of the oldest US terrorist crime databases, and the most complete record of the FBI's investigation of terrorism over the last three decades. For more information about the ATS, see Smith andDamphousse (1996, 1998 (Tolnay & Beck, 1995;Wright, 1996); "boot stomping" and other brutal assaults committed by racist neo-Nazi/skinhead groups (Hamm, 1993;Kaplan, 1995;McCurrie, 1998); and the highly publicized armed robberies carried out by organizations such as the Order and The Covenant, The Sword, and the Arm of the Lord (CSA) (Barkun, 1989(Barkun, , 1997Becker, Jipson, & Katz, 2001). 11 The ECDB defines Far Rightists as individuals who support aspects of the following beliefs/ characteristics: They are fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation); anti-global; suspicious of centralized federal authority; reverent of individual liberty (especially their right to own guns, be free of taxes); and believe in conspiracy theories that involve (1) a grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty, (2) a belief that one's personal and/or national "way of life" is under attack and is either already lost or the threat is imminent (sometimes such beliefs are amorphous and vague, but for some the threat is from a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group), and (3) a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack by participating in paramilitary preparations and training and survivalism. ...
Chapter
In this chapter, we take stock of existing studies on extremist homicide and suggest future directions for this line of research. We begin by addressing several definitional and methodological problems that have stunted comparative research on extremist homicides, and how criminologists have overcome some of these obstacles by relying on alternative, open‐source databases. Our focus is primarily on homicides perpetrated by members and affiliates of the extreme Far Right and al Qaeda and associated movements (AQAM), which have been responsible for the majority of violent incidents resulting in fatalities in the United States over the past 30 years. Next, we review findings from previous studies on extremist homicides, and the situational and community contexts in which these violent acts have occurred. We end by proposing several recommendations for the application of alternative conceptual schema, theoretical perspectives, and methodological approaches to the study of extremist homicide.
Article
In 2017, far-right mobilization and demonstrations in the United States were at the highest levels since the 1980s and 90s. This coincided with a marked increase in propaganda campaigns in neighborhoods and across college campuses. Racial activists renewed efforts to rebrand extreme positions, soften racist rhetoric, and grow the movement. The purpose of this case study was to explore the rhetorical content of the propaganda created by one white supremacist. This study contributes to a growing body of literature on far-right propaganda through an examination of common themes, and a comparison of the framing techniques and rhetorical strategies used by other white supremacists.
Article
Full-text available
The literature on social movements and deviance has failed to recognize that social movement organizations also promote deviance in society. This oversight stems from a tendency in the dominant paradigm of social movement theory to normalize the activities of these movements by equating their activities with political behavior. Focusing on the modern militia movement, we discuss the explicit and implicit paths through which movements promote deviance and/or criminal behavior. Noting that the movement has both a “defensive” and an “offensive” wing, we find that they promote deviance both through their ideology, which legitimizes deviance, and through their organizational structures, which are unable to control either the actions of those who are part of the movement or the flow of movement-generated information.
Article
Few aspects of post-structuralist literary criticism have garnered as much attention and provoked as much controversy as the move to challenge the idea of a fixed literary canon of great texts. The implications of deconstructing the canon extend well beyond the study of fiction. All fields of scholarship have a canon of established texts, methodologies, and questions. Critiques of the literary canon resemble the challenge to conventional history posed by the new social history and its efforts to write a history from the bottom up that would supplant traditional historical scholarship. A similar revisionist effort is now only just beginning to emerge in constitutional historiography. Proponents of “a new constitutional history” are seeking to challenge the canon of traditional constitutional history. While this revisionist project has not been cast in post-structuralist terms, the perspective provided by recent critical theory can refine the practice of the new constitutional history.
Article
A long tradition in social science explains recruitment to religious cults and sects on the basis of a congruence between the ideology of a group and the deprivations of those who join. A more recent approach to recruitment argues that interpersonal bonds between members and potential recruits are the essential element. In this paper we first show that these are complementary, not competing, approaches. Then, because the available evidential base for the role of interpersonal bonds is limited and qualitative, we present quantitative data pertaining to three quite different radical religious groups. In each case there is overwhelming support for the crucial role played by social networks in the formation and growth of such groups. Next we seek the boundaries of this phenomenon.Available studies suggest that not merely cult and sect recruitment, but commitment to conventional faiths as well, is supported by social networks.However, networks do not seem to play an important role in acceptance of mildly devia...
The Hero and the Herd in Technological History: Reflections on Thomas Edison and “The Battle of the Systems”. Paper presented in the Conference in Honor of David S. Landes
  • P A David