No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.
Starting BLC: 1996–1998
Abstract
This short piece relates how BLC was started, from the decision to begin a new journal in the spring of 1996 all the way to the publication of the first issue in June 1998. The topics covered are: writing a proposal, choosing a publisher, getting things started at Cambridge University Press and within the editorial team, and preparing the first issue.
The United States prides itself on being a classless society where economic determinism can be transcended by the right amount of merit, determination, and luck. At the same time, however, the U.S. has the second highest wealth inequality rate of any developed nation and the second lowest intergenerational mobility. Explaining the contradiction between the myth of the American Dream and the economic reality is no easy task. This article attempts to explain the role ideology and cultural myth play in mediating this contradiction by analyzing the ABC reality television series Extreme Makeover: Home Edition. Extreme Makeover: Home Edition is a wildly popular program in which a team of home builders and designers travel around the country building new homes for desperate and deserving families. I use the portrayals of seven of these families to explain the specific way Extreme Makeover portrays each families as deserving and meriting spectacular material assistance. This ideology offers support for the reinforcement of existing economic power structures and the myth of the American Dream.
Fast polarization changes of 40 krad/s and 6-dB polarization-dependent loss (PDL) are tracked in a 2.8-Gb/s real-time coherent quadrature phase-shift keying receiver. The tolerance against fast polarization changes and PDL is measured for different polarization control time constants. The sensitivity penalty of the receiver at a polarization change speed of 40 krad/s is 0.7 dB at bit-error rate (BER) of 1times 10-3, with a BER floor of 6.1times10-7. With an additional PDL of 6 dB, these figures become 1.7 dB and 9.6 times 10-6, respectively.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.