ArticlePublisher preview available

Inferring the causes of the three waves of the 1918 influenza pandemic in England and Wales

The Royal Society
Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Past influenza pandemics appear to be characterized by multiple waves of incidence, but the mechanisms that account for this phenomenon remain unclear. We propose a simple epidemic model, which incorporates three factors that might contribute to the generation of multiple waves: (i) schools opening and closing, (ii) temperature changes during the outbreak, and (iii) changes in human behaviour in response to the outbreak. We fit this model to the reported influenza mortality during the 1918 pandemic in 334 UK administrative units and estimate the epidemiological parameters. We then use information criteria to evaluate how well these three factors explain the observed patterns of mortality. Our results indicate that all three factors are important but that behavioural responses had the largest effect. The parameter values that produce the best fit are biologically reasonable and yield epidemiological dynamics that match the observed data well.
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org
Research
Cite this article: He D, Dushoff J, Day T, Ma J,
Earn DJD. 2013 Inferring the causes of the
three waves of the 1918 influenza pandemic in
England and Wales. Proc R Soc B 280:
20131345.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1345
Received: 28 May 2013
Accepted: 14 June 2013
Subject Areas:
health and disease and epidemiology,
theoretical biology
Keywords:
pandemic influenza, behavioural response,
weather, iterated filtering, school closure,
Spanish flu
Author for correspondence:
Daihai He
e-mail: hedaihai@gmail.com
Electronic supplementary material is available
at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1345 or
via http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org.
Inferring the causes of the three waves
of the 1918 influenza pandemic in
England and Wales
Daihai He1, Jonathan Dushoff2,3,TroyDay
5, Junling Ma6
and David J. D. Earn3,4
1
Department of Applied Mathematics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
(SAR), People’s Republic of China
2
Department of Biology,
3
M.G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, and
4
Department of
Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
5
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen’s University, Kingston, Onario, Canada
6
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Past influenza pandemics appear to be characterized by multiple waves of
incidence, but the mechanisms that account for this phenomenon remain
unclear. We propose a simple epidemic model, which incorporates three fac-
tors that might contribute to the generation of multiple waves: (i) schools
opening and closing, (ii) temperature changes during the outbreak, and
(iii) changes in human behaviour in response to the outbreak. We fit this
model to the reported influenza mortality during the 1918 pandemic in 334
UK administrative units and estimate the epidemiological parameters. We
then use information criteria to evaluate how well these three factors explain
the observed patterns of mortality. Our results indicate that all three factors
are important but that behavioural responses had the largest effect. The par-
ameter values that produce the best fit are biologically reasonable and yield
epidemiological dynamics that match the observed data well.
1. Introduction
The 1918 influenza pandemic was the deadliest pandemic in history. An estimated
50– 100 million people were killed worldwide, and one-third of the world’s popu-
lation is estimated to have been infected [1]. The incidence of influenza and the
resultant mortality exhibited multiple waves during the 1918 pandemic, with
many regions experiencing up to three peaks in mortality [2– 5]. For example,
figure 1 shows the pattern of mortality in the UK during the 12 month period
beginning in June 1918; three distinct waves are evident throughout the country
during this single year. The recent influenza pandemic in 2009 also displayed
multiple waves of incidence in many Northern Hemisphere countries [6–11].
Identifying the processes that give rise to multiple pandemic waves is impor-
tant for public health. This problem has consequently attracted much attention,
with several mechanisms being proposed, including viral evolution (which mod-
ifies transmissibility, immunological escape or both), environmental change
(primarily weather conditions) and behavioural change of people in response
to the pandemic [12,13]. Several statistical analyses of data from past pandemics
have identified potential causes of mortality patterns. For example, Chowell et al.
[14] found that death rates during the 1918 pandemic in the UK were 30–40%
higher in cities and towns when compared with rural areas; and Pearce et al.
[15] found that the occurrence of epidemic waves in the UK in 1918 was associ-
ated with patterns of socioeconomic status and age, potentially as a result of prior
immunity within some age groups. An analysis by Andreasen et al. [3] suggests
that immunological history might play a role. As many of these authors have
noted, however, these results are strictly correlative and a combination of statisti-
cal analysis and mechanistic mathematical modelling is required to establish a
causal relationship between such factors and the occurrence of multiple waves.
&2013 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
... Compartmental models like ours can be extended to more accurately represent the complexity of epidemics and the systems in which they occur, such as birth and death dynamics, additional compartment types with different risk and behavior profiles (19,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), seasonal effects (35), waning immunity (34,36), e.g., due to new variants (37), the dynamics of information, such as wordof-mouth propagation or the imitation of behavior (4), as well as spatial, transmission, or behavioral heterogeneity (4,30,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42). Other approaches feature spatial (43) and temporal networks (44,45), and/or agent-based models (46)(47)(48)(49). ...
Article
Full-text available
Faced with a dangerous epidemic humans will spontaneously social distance to reduce their risk of infection at a socioeconomic cost. Compartmentalized epidemic models have been extended to include this endogenous decision making: Individuals choose their behavior to optimize a utility function, self-consistently giving rise to population behavior. Here, we study the properties of the resulting Nash equilibria, in which no member of the population can gain an advantage by unilaterally adopting different behavior. We leverage an analytic solution that yields fully time-dependent rational population behavior to obtain, 1) a simple relationship between rational social distancing behavior and the current number of infections; 2) scaling results for how the infection peak and number of total cases depend on the cost of contracting the disease; 3) characteristic infection costs that divide regimes of strong and weak behavioral response; 4) a closed form expression for the value of the utility. We discuss how these analytic results provide a deep and intuitive understanding of the disease dynamics, useful for both individuals and policymakers. In particular, the relationship between social distancing and infections represents a heuristic that could be communicated to the population to encourage, or “bootstrap,” rational behavior.
... Viral respiratory epidemics like influenza can lead to serious illness, hospitalization, and even death, especially for the elderly, children, and certain chronic disease patients [20][21][22][23][24]. However, when the pandemic occurs, the imperfect or delayed supply of vaccines, as well as the emergence of the drug resistance that may be caused by the current antiviral treatment, are all obstacles on the road to prevention and control [25][26][27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The burden of influenza virus infection poses a challenge due to its significant negative impact on public health. The implementation of intervention measures including vaccination, treatment, and isolation can help alleviate this influence. In this paper, we consider an optimal control problem with both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, which involves widely concerned issues such as the decline of vaccine-based immunity and the emergence of drug resistance. We prove the existence of the optimal control, solve the optimal control problem through applying the Pontryagin’s maximum principle, and conduct some numerical experiments to seek out effective prevention and control strategies. We arrive at a conclusion that the best strategy to control the outbreak of influenza is to isolate infected individuals as soon as possible when medical resources are abundant, such as staying at home, avoiding crowded places and so on. Epidemiologically, we find that reducing the waning rate of vaccine-based immunity is also an effective strategy when there is energy available, and may be better than increasing treatment rates.
... This behavioral heterogeneity played a major role in shaping the trajectory and burden of the pandemic [27,28,29]. Numerous modeling types,(including compartmental [27,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], agent-based [26,41,43,44,45], network [44,45,46,47,48,49], etc.,) have been used to gain insight and understanding on the role of human behavior changes (or heterogeneities) on the spread and control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. These models typically assume that individual disease-related behavior change (such as adherence or non-adherence to public health interventions, reducing contacts, etc.) is motivated by a combination of disease-related metrics (such as the level of disease prevalence and intervention fatigue in their local community or population) [33,35,38,40], peer pressure or influence [26,38,43,46], and other costs associated with adoption of disease-related precautionary behaviors). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
A novel behavior-epidemiology model, which considers n heterogeneous behavioral groups based on level of risk tolerance and distinguishes behavioral changes by social and disease-related motivations (such as peer-influence and fear of disease-related hospitalizations), is developed. In addition to rigorously analyzing the basic qualitative features of this model, a special case is considered where the total population is stratified into two groups: risk-averse (Group 1) and risk-tolerant (Group 2). The two-group behavior model has three disease-free equilibria in the absence of disease, and their stability is analyzed using standard linearization and the properties of Metzler-stable matrices. Furthermore, the two-group model was calibrated and validated using daily hospitalization data for New York City during the first wave, and the calibrated model was used to predict the data for the second wave. Numerical simulations of the calibrated two-group behavior model showed that while the dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic during the first wave was largely influenced by the behavior of the risk-tolerant individuals, the dynamics during the second wave was influenced by the behavior of individuals in both groups. It was also shown that disease-motivated behavioral changes had greater influence in significantly reducing SARS-CoV-2 morbidity and mortality than behavior changes due to the level of peer or social influence or pressure. Finally, it is shown that the initial proportion of members in the community that are risk-averse (i.e., the proportion of individuals in Group 1 at the beginning of the pandemic) and the early and effective implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions have major impacts in reducing the size and burden of the pandemic (particularly the total SARS-CoV-2 mortality in New York City during the second wave).
... With these policy considerations in mind, our data and our analyses aim to fill a gap in the availability of high-quality epidemiological data related to the severity of an epidemic and human behavior. Past research has shown that accounting for behavior change improves epidemiological models' ability to capture the trajectory of a disease and make predictions compared to models that do not explicitly account for behavior change [53,54,55]. However, in the absence of data like the survey data we present, these models often rely on disease severity metrics to serve as proxies of human behavior. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The transmission of communicable diseases in human populations is known to be modulated by behavioral patterns. However, detailed characterizations of how population-level behaviors change over time during multiple disease outbreaks and spatial resolutions are still not widely available. We used data from 431,211 survey responses collected in the United States, between April 2020 and June 2022, to provide a description of how human behaviors fluctuated during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis suggests that at the national and state levels, people’s adherence to recommendations to avoid contact with others (a preventive behavior) was highest early in the pandemic but gradually—and linearly—decreased over time. Importantly, during periods of intense COVID-19 mortality, adherence to preventive behaviors increased—despite the overall temporal decrease. These spatial-temporal characterizations help improve our understanding of the bidirectional feedback loop between outbreak severity and human behavior. Our findings should benefit both computational modeling teams developing methodologies to predict the dynamics of future epidemics and policymakers designing strategies to mitigate the effects of future disease outbreaks.
Article
Full-text available
El modelado de la propagación de enfermedades infecciosas es fundamental para entender y predecir la dinámica de epidemias. Entre los modelos más utilizados se encuentran el SIR, SIS y SEIR, cada uno adaptado a diferentes características de las enfermedades. El modelo SIR divide la población en tres grupos: Susceptibles (S), Infectados (I) y Recuperados (R). Los susceptibles son individuos que pueden contraer la enfermedad; los infectados son aquellos que la tienen y pueden transmitirla; y los recuperados son los que ya se han curado y han adquirido inmunidad. El modelo SIR es útil para enfermedades en las que la recuperación implica inmunidad permanente, como la varicela. El modelo SIS, por otro lado, se utiliza para enfermedades en las que la infección no confiere inmunidad duradera. Aquí, la población se divide en Susceptibles (S) e Infectados (I). Una vez que los individuos se recuperan, regresan al grupo de susceptibles, como es el caso de infecciones bacterianas donde no se desarrolla una inmunidad a largo plazo. El modelo SEIR introduce una etapa adicional llamada Expuestos (E), que representa a los individuos que han sido infectados, pero no son todavía infecciosos. La población se divide en Susceptibles (S), Expuestos (E), Infectados (I) y Recuperados (R). Este modelo es adecuado para enfermedades con un período de incubación, donde los individuos infectados no son inmediatamente infecciosos, como el caso del COVID-19.
Preprint
Full-text available
Objectives Elucidating how people think and behave during a disease outbreak may provide valuable insight and help direct programs or surveillance to combat the spread of disease. As universities welcomed students back to their campuses following COVID-19 shutdowns, it became important to know students' beliefs on COVID-19 and how these beliefs guided behaviors? The objective of this study was to determine how students at East Carolina University felt about COVID-19, which behaviors they exhibited during the pandemic, and whether their feelings and behaviors differed significantly between the Spring and Fall 2021 semesters. Methods Surveys (N= 408) were distributed to students who were currently enrolled in Environmental Health Science classes during the Spring and Fall semesters of 2021. Questions were developed using a Likert scale and were analyzed to determine significant differences (p < 0.05) between semesters. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (SPSS Institute, Chicago, Ill). Results Results showed most students felt “somewhat concerned” about the COVID-19 pandemic during both semesters. Significant differences in student concern regarding COVID-19 between Spring and Fall semesters, were not observed p = 0.598. Student behaviors regarding weekly gatherings significant differed between semesters with a reported increase in gatherings of 5+ during the Fall semester, p < 0.001. Interestingly, we found more students indicated during the Spring semester in comparison to the Fall that they believed the vaccine was not safe and they would not take it (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our findings suggest that as the pandemic went on, behavior changes were observed in students between the semesters. This information may be important to officials as cases may fluctuate over time. Knowledge of attitudes and/or behaviors and awareness may help explain these fluctuations, allowing public health professionals to adjust recommendations and focus more intently on populations at risk.
Article
Full-text available
Previous work has failed to fit classic SEIR epidemic models satisfactorily to the prevalence data of the famous English boarding school 1978 influenza A/H1N1 outbreak during the children’s pandemic. It is still an open question whether a biologically plausible model can fit the prevalence time series and the attack rate correctly. To construct the final model, we first used an intentionally very flexible and overfitted discrete-time epidemiologic model to learn the epidemiological features from the data. The final model was a susceptible (S) – exposed (E) – infectious (I) – confined-to-bed (B) – convalescent (C) – recovered (R) model with time delay (constant residence time) in E and I compartments and multi-stage (Erlang-distributed residence time) in B and C compartments. We simultaneously fitted the reported B and C prevalence curves as well as the attack rate (proportion of children infected during the outbreak). The non-exponential residence times were crucial for good fits. The estimates of the generation time and the basic reproductive number (R0) were biologically reasonable. A simplified discrete-time model was built and fitted using the Bayesian procedure. Our work not only provided an answer to the open question, but also demonstrated an approach to constructive model generation.
Article
Full-text available
Influenza pandemics through history have shown very different patterns of incidence, morbidity and mortality. In particular, pandemics in different times and places have shown anywhere from one to three “waves” of incidence. Understanding the factors that underlie variability in temporal patterns, as well as patterns of morbidity and mortality, is important for public health planning. We use a likelihood-based approach to explore different potential explanations for the three waves of incidence and mortality seen in the 1918 influenza pandemic in London, England. Our analysis suggests that temporal variation in transmission rate provides the best proximate explanation and that the variation in transmission required to generate these three epidemic waves is within biologically plausible values. KeywordsInfluenza–Pandemic–1918–London, England –Time series–Mathematical modelling–POMP
Article
Full-text available
We develop a three dimensional compartmental model to investigate the impact of media coverage to the spread and control of infectious diseases (such as SARS) in a given region/area. Stability analysis of the model shows that the disease-free equilibrium is globally-asymptotically stable if a certain threshold quantity, the basic reproduction number ( \mathbb R0\mathbb R_0), is less than unity. On the other hand, if R0>1\mathbb R_0 > 1\mathbb R_0 > 1 , it is shown that a unique endemic equilibrium appears and a Hopf bifurcation can occur which causes oscillatory phenomena. The model may have up to three positive equilibria. Numerical simulations suggest that when R0>1\mathbb R_0 > 1\mathbb R_0 > 1 and the media impact is stronger enough, the model exhibits multiple positive equilibria which poses challenge to the prediction and control of the outbreaks of infectious diseases.
Article
Full-text available
Previous influenza pandemics (1918, 1957, and 1968) have all had multiple waves. The 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) (pandemic H1N1) started in April 2009 and was followed, in the United States (US) and temperate Northern Hemisphere, by a second wave during the fall of 2009. The ratio of susceptible and immune individuals in a population at the end of a wave determines the potential and magnitude of a subsequent wave. As influenza vaccines are not completely protective, there was a combined immunity in the population at the beginning of 2010 (due to vaccination and due to previous natural infection), and it was uncertain if this mixture of herd immunity was enough to prevent a third wave of pandemic influenza during the winter of 2010. Motivated by this problem, we developed a mathematical deterministic two-group epidemic model with vaccination and calibrated it for the 2009 pandemic H1N1. Then, applying methods from mathematical epidemiology we developed a scheme that allowed us to determine critical thresholds for vaccine-induced and natural immunity that would prevent the spread of influenza. Finally, we estimated the level of combined immunity in the US during winter 2010. Our results suggest that a third wave was unlikely if the basic reproduction number R(0) were below 1.6, plausible if the original R(0) was 1.6, and likely if the original R(0) was 1.8 or higher. Given that the estimates for the basic reproduction number for pandemic influenza place it in the range between 1.4 and 1.6 (Bacaer and Ait Dads, 2011; Fraser et al., 2009; Munayco et al., 2009; Pourbohloul et al., 2009; Tuite et al., 2010; White et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2009), our approach accurately predicted the absence of a third wave of influenza in the US during the winter of 2010. We also used this scheme to accurately predict the second wave of pandemic influenza in London and the West Midlands, UK during the fall of 2009.
Article
Full-text available
Control of pandemic influenza by social-distancing measures, such as school closures, is a controversial aspect of pandemic planning. However, investigations of the extent to which these measures actually affect the progression of a pandemic have been limited. To examine correlations between the incidence of pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) influenza in Alberta, Canada, in 2009 and school closures or weather changes, and to estimate the effects of school closures and weather changes on pH1N1 transmission. Mathematical transmission models were fit to data that compared the pattern of confirmed pH1N1 cases with the school calendar and weather patterns. Alberta, Canada, from 19 April 2009 to 2 January 2010. 2009 virologic test results, 2006 census data, 2009 daily temperature and humidity data, and 2009 school calendars. Age-specific daily counts of positive results for pH1N1 from the complete database of 35 510 specimens submitted to the Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health for virologic testing from 19 April 2009 to 2 January 2010. The ending and restarting of school terms had a major effect in attenuating the first wave and starting the second wave of pandemic influenza cases. Mathematical models suggested that school closure reduced transmission among school-age children by more than 50% and that this was a key factor in interrupting transmission. The models also indicated that seasonal changes in weather had a significant effect on the temporal pattern of the epidemic. Data probably represent a small sample of all viral infections. The mathematical models make simplifying assumptions in order to make simulations and analysis feasible. Analysis of data from unrestricted virologic testing during an influenza pandemic provides compelling evidence that closing schools can have dramatic effects on transmission of pandemic influenza. School closure seems to be an effective strategy for slowing the spread of pandemic influenza in countries with social contact networks similar to those in Canada. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Public Health Agency of Canada.
Article
Full-text available
In order to compare the transmissibility of the 2009 pH1N1 pandemic during successive waves of infections in summer and fall/winter in the Northern Hemisphere, and to assess the temporal changes during the course of the outbreak in relation to the intervention measures implemented, we analyze the epidemiological patterns of the epidemic in Taiwan during July 2009-March 2010. We utilize the multi-phase Richards model to fit the weekly cumulative pH1N1 epidemiological data (numbers of confirmed cases and hospitalizations) as well as the daily number of classes suspended under a unique "325" partial school closing policy in Taiwan, in order to pinpoint the turning points of the summer and fall/winter waves, and to estimate the reproduction numbers R for each wave. Our analysis indicates that the summer wave had slowed down by early September when schools reopened for fall. However, a second fall/winter wave began in late September, approximately 4 weeks after the school reopened, peaking at about 2-3 weeks after the start of the mass immunization campaign in November. R is estimated to be in the range of 1.04-1.27 for the first wave, and between 1.01-1.05 for the second wave. Transmissibility of the summer wave in Taiwan during July-early September, as measured by R, was lower than that of the earlier spring outbreak in North America and Europe, as well as that of the winter outbreak in Southern Hemisphere. Furthermore, transmissibility during fall/winter in Taiwan was noticeably lower than that of the summer, which is attributable to population-level immunity acquired from the earlier summer wave and also to the intervention measures that were implemented prior to and during the fall/winter wave.
Article
Full-text available
Since April 2009, the outbreak of human pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus (pH1N1) infection has spread from North America to other parts of the world, and currently, pH1N1 is the predominant circulating strain of influenza viruses. Our objectives were to perform a serological survey of medical personnel at the Chumphae Hospital in Thailand and to investigate the prevalence of pH1N1 in randomly selected patients diagnosed with respiratory tract disease. Prevalence of pH1N1 in the patients was determined by performing real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The study was carried out between July 2009 and November 2010. Seroprevalence of hemaglutination inhibition (HI) titers among medical personnel was established in three cross-sectional studies at the end of each wave of the pandemic by performing HI assay to detect antibodies against pH1N1. Infection by the pH1N1 peaked between July and October 2009; the second wave was from January to March 2010 and the third wave from June to November 2010. The HI titers after the first, second, and third waves were 48.2%, 22.4%, and 25.7%, respectively. After the second and third waves, 52.1% and 45.3% of the medical personnel who had received pH1N1 vaccination had HI titers ≥ 40. These findings show that seasonal influenza strain in Chumphae and the predominant influenza strain from each wave was pH1N1. HI assay results also represent the severity of the attack rate in each wave.
Article
Dramatic changes in patterns of epidemics have been observed throughout this century. For childhood infectious diseases such as measles, the major transitions are between regular cycles and irregular, possibly chaotic epidemics, and from regionally synchronized oscillations to complex, spatially incoherent epidemics. A simple model can explain both kinds of transitions as the consequences of changes in birth and vaccination rates. Measles is a natural ecological system that exhibits different dynamical transitions at different times and places, yet all of these transitions can be predicted as bifurcations of a single nonlinear model.
Article
Many infectious diseases give rise to recurrent epidemics. The time interval between epidemics is consequently an important property that epidemiologists and public health officials would like to be able to predict. Accurate estimates have been made for certain diseases by associating the observed interepidemic interval with the natural period of damped oscillations near the stable equilibrium solution of the standard (unforced) SEIR model. For childhood infections, this successful prediction is surprising because seasonal variation in contact rates (due to school terms) is known to have significant effects on patterns of disease incidence. We show that the natural damping period of transients near the annual attractor of the seasonally forced SEIR model is usually well-approximated by the damping period obtained without forcing. This explains why naive calculations of interepidemic intervals have yielded accurate results in certain cases. However, the unforced approximation cannot be justified if the forced model has a non-annual attractor with a non-negligible basin of attraction, as is typically the case for measles; consequently, agreement between the interepidemic interval predicted by the unforced model for measles and real measles time series, appears to be coincidental.