ArticlePDF Available

Complaining Behavior in Social Interaction

Authors:

Abstract

Complaining is a pervasive and important form of social communication but one whose social communicative functions have yet to be subject to empirical investigation. The present study was the first to examine the role of complaining in everyday social interactions. College students kept diaries of the complaints they made to other people for 3 consecutive days, twice during the semester. Students recorded the complaint, the reason for expressing it, and the response it elicited. Over 75% of all complaints registered were non instrumental in nature, in that they were not directed at changing an existing state of affairs but, rather, were expressed for reasons such as to vent frustration or to solicit sympathy. The most frequent complaints involved specific behaviors of another person. The most frequent response to a complaint was to agree with the complainer's statement. The importance of complaining as a form of social communication is discussed, and a number of hypotheses are generated for future research.
http://psp.sagepub.com/
Bulletin
Personality and Social Psychology
http://psp.sagepub.com/content/18/3/286
The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292183004
1992 18: 286Pers Soc Psychol Bull
Mark D. Alicke, James C. Braun, Jeffrey E. Glor, M. L. Klotz, Jon Magee, Heather Sederhoim and Robin Siegel
Complaining Behavior in Social Interaction
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Society for Personality and Social Psychology
can be found at:Personality and Social Psychology BulletinAdditional services and information for
http://psp.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:
http://psp.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:
http://psp.sagepub.com/content/18/3/286.refs.htmlCitations:
What is This?
- Jun 1, 1992Version of Record >>
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
from the SAGE Social Science Collections. All Rights Reserved.
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
at OHIO UNIV on March 20, 2014psp.sagepub.comDownloaded from
... Complaining exchanges often drift away from their initial topic, but always remain centered on their purpose of affect sharing between the complainer and complainee. In fact, many complaints do not relate "true" suffering but describe harmless or innocuous events of little importance (Alicke et al., 1992;Boxer, 1993). While eliciting empathy and affiliation by describing low-suffering situations may seem counter-intuitive, this communicative strategy effectively facilitates the empathic involvement of listeners in different types of social contexts, from routine rituals among intimates to ice-breaker conversations between strangers (Boxer, 1993;Kowalski, 2002). ...
... The relative ease for processing innocuous complaints confirms their non-instrumental nature: one can virtually complain about anything (Alicke et al., 1992;Boxer, 1993), as long as they can efficiently reconstruct and convey their affective state (Caffi & Janney, 1994;Selting, 2010). Prosody appears as the emotive device of choice in that regard, with a clear acoustic signature that is perceptually identifiable and processed from utterance onset , 2022b. ...
... Still, this study is the first to provide neurophysiological evidence that emotive prosody can take precedence over semantic information in complaining speech, complementing a sparse but growing literature in the fields of pragmatics (Drew & Walker, 2009;Edwards, 2005;Selting, 2010), acoustics (Acuña-Ferreira, 2002;Ogden, 2007;Rao, 2013), and experimental psychology . Behavioral results, however, suggest that this primacy is not absolute: while here, prosodic cues largely drove the perception of speaker pain, there is other evidence that perceptually hierarchize complaining topics even when spoken with an emotive voice (Alicke et al., 1992). ...
Article
When complaining, speakers can use their voice to convey a feeling of pain, even when describing innocuous events. Rapid detection of emotive and identity features of the voice may constrain how the semantic content of complaints is processed, as indexed by N400 and P600 effects evoked by the final, pain-related word. Twenty-six participants listened to statements describing painful and innocuous events expressed in a neutral or complaining voice, produced by ingroup and outgroup accented speakers. Participants evaluated how hurt the speaker felt under EEG monitoring. Principal Component Analysis of Event-Related Potentials from the final word onset demonstrated N400 and P600 increases when complainers described innocuous vs. painful events in a neutral voice, but these effects were altered when utterances were expressed in a complaining voice. Independent of prosody, N400 amplitudes increased for complaints spoken in outgroup vs. ingroup accents. Results demonstrate that prosody and accent constrain the processing of spoken complaints as proposed in a parallel-constraint-satisfaction model.
... It is because users usually perceive positive reviews as more useful than positive reviews (Eslami et al., 2018;Lee et al., 2017). Furthermore, according to literature (Alicke et al., 1992); Berkowitz, 1970;Berger, 2014), the more negative the attitude of users towards the brand, the greater their desire to vent. Therefore, users that have had negative experiences are more prone to extensive reviews rather than brief reviews. ...
... Nonetheless, it is striking that negative reviews predominate in the most extensive reviews rather than the shorter ones. According to Alicke et al. (1992), Berkowitz (1970) and Berger (2014), the more negative the attitude of users towards the brand, the greater their desire to vent. Therefore, users with negative experiences are more prone to extensive reviews rather than brief reviews. ...
Article
Full-text available
Mobile applications (apps) are becoming an essential tool when it comes to sightseeing. There is even a specific category for trips in the leading app stores. These are no strangers to the rise of the itinerant travel style, the caravans. The study aims to understand the situation of the main caravanning apps in Spain. We have carried out a web scraping methodology using a sample of 1,601 Spanish reviews of the main apps related to caravanning. The most interesting findings, among others, are that we are getting to know a sector that up to now was unknown and that even has not been affected by the pandemic crisis. Besides, the paper has demonstrated that developers do not follow the right strategies in caravanning apps. The paper also shows users' most crucial concerns about these apps. Therefore, managers of caravanning apps could improve their strategies by focusing their attention on users' concerns and, most important, reviews to respond.
... Although consumers often have targeted and concrete motivations for speaking with companies (e.g., to seek compensation or improve a company's offerings), they often communicate with companies simply to be heard. In fact, studies of complaints have shown that over 75% of complaints are non-instrumental (Alicke et al., 1992) (Alick, Braun, Glor, Klotz, Magee, Sederholm, & Siegel, 1992. That is, they are not aimed at changing the current state of affairs but rather at satisfying emotional needs such as venting or eliciting sympathy. ...
Article
Full-text available
Consumers' decisions are intricately interwoven with their conversations. Whether it is an animated discussion with a trusted friend extolling the virtues of a newly acquired car (i.e., Word-of-Mouth), an engaging dialogue with a salesperson, or a clarifying call to a help center seeking guidance on a just-purchased smartwatch, every exchange hinges on a pivotal factor: the quality of listening. Listening quality shapes perceptions, affects social influence, drives behavioral intentions, and, ultimately, determines purchase and post-purchase outcomes. Yet, despite its importance to these consumer behavior outcomes, listening has received scant attention in consumer psychology. In this paper, we review the effects of listening on consumer behavior-relevant outcomes and unpack the components of quality listening to reveal their independent mechanisms. We also point to new frontiers in listening research beyond the in-person, dyadic interactions that have been the primary focus of listening research to date. By doing this, we elucidate how listening and consumer behavior are connected and encourage more research on listening in consumer psychology.
... People often express their dissatisfaction with others, this is very common in social life [7]. In the literature, the broadest definition of complaint is the expression of discontent, regardless of whether such discontent really exists or not [8]. ...
... However, due to the hierarchical difference, they may feel too powerless to directly confront their supervisors or publicly express their frustration (Zellars et al., 2002). Gossiping negatively about the supervisor provides an alternative outlet for employees to cope with aversive experiences with supervisors, vent their negative emotions, and more importantly, regain a sense of power when they lack the structural power to safely confront supervisors (Alicke et al., 1992;Lee & Barnes, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Although negative gossip is ubiquitous in the workplace, we know little about how negatively gossiping about the supervisor—who occupies a higher hierarchical position in the organization—influences gossipers themselves. To address this question, we draw on the conservation of resources theory to account for the resource‐consuming and resource‐generating impact of negative gossip about the supervisor on gossipers’ work engagement. Findings from three experience sampling studies show that negative gossip about the supervisor is a double‐edged sword for gossipers that seems to do more harm than good to their work engagement. On the one hand, spreading negative gossip about the supervisor evokes the resource‐consuming mechanism of image maintenance concerns, which impairs gossipers’ work engagement, especially when perceived organizational politics is higher. On the other hand, engaging in such gossip elicits the resource‐generating mechanism of sense of power, which only improves work engagement in Study 3 but not in Studies 1 and 2; contrary to our expectation, this effect is unaffected by perceived organizational politics. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and practical contributions of our research. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
... (Sezer et al., 2015). These statements involve a complaint, expressing discontent, displeasure, or an unfavorable attitude (Alicke et al., 1992;Kowalski, 2002), yet simultaneously allow speakers to showcase their enviably good qualities. Such humblebragging, masking success in the guise of complaint, is increasingly common and has attracted a large volume of media attention as one of the "excesses" of self-enhancement online (Alford, 2012;Dean, 2011;Wittels, 2012). ...
Article
This study aims to join the recent academic conversation on humblebragging prevalent in Versailles literature on Chinese social media by addressing several important yet somehow underexplored aspects of the cyberpragmatic phenomenon. Based on a sizable self-built database, it finds that the nature of the complainables involved in the Versailles literature makes ostensible complaints interpretable as disguised bragging. It argues that Chi-nese posters choose to brag under the disguise of ostensible complaining to balance the need of modesty with that of show-off and identification apart from soliciting likes; Tucao subculture, Bandwagon effect, and technological affordances may all contribute to the popularity of such humblebragging on Chinese social media. It is hoped that this article may provide new insights into Chinese humblebrags on the one hand and generate implications for Internet pragmatic research on the other.
... Complaints are verbal descriptions of a distressing, annoying, or painful event (Boxer, 1993;Drew, 1998). When addressed indirectly to a third party -as opposed to direct complaints addressed to the source of the distress (see Laforest, 2002) -complaints do not seek to resolve an issue, but rather, to foster the listener's affiliation to their suffering (Alicke et al., 1992;Drew and Walker, 2009). In order to negotiate this affiliation, speakers aim to trigger mechanisms of mood contagion and shared affect (Kowalski, 2002;Selting, 2010), as well as mentalizing processes for their listener to infer their subjective state (Edwards, 2005). ...
Article
Interpersonal communication often involves sharing our feelings with others; complaining, for example, aims to elicit empathy in listeners by vocally expressing a speaker's suffering. Despite the growing neuroscientific interest in the phenomenon of empathy, few have investigated how it is elicited in real time by vocal signals (prosody), and how this might be affected by interpersonal factors, such as a speaker's cultural background (based on their accent). To investigate the neural processes at play when hearing spoken complaints, twenty-six French participants listened to complaining and neutral utterances produced by in-group French and out-group Québécois (i.e., French-Canadian) speakers. Participants rated how hurt the speaker felt while their cerebral activity was monitored with electroencephalography (EEG). Principal Component Analysis of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) taken at utterance onset showed culture-dependent time courses of emotive prosody processing. The high motivational relevance of ingroup complaints increased the P200 response compared to all other utterance types; in contrast, outgroup complaints selectively elicited an early posterior negativity in the same time window, followed by an increased N400 (due to ongoing effort to derive affective meaning from outgroup voices). Ingroup neutral utterances evoked a late negativity which may reflect re-analysis of emotively less salient, but culturally relevant ingroup speech. Results highlight the time-course of neurocognitive responses that contribute to emotive speech processing for complaints, establishing the critical role of prosody as well as social-relational factors (i.e., cultural identity) on how listeners are likely to “empathize” with a speaker.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose-Drawing on affective events theory, this study investigates the multilevel effect of exploitative leadership on employee’s workplace venting. We also test the mediating effect of negative emotions and the moderating effect of supervisor’s organizational embodiment (SOE) on the relationship between the two constructs. Design/methodology/approach-The surveys were conducted in three waves. First, we administered questionnaires to 576 employees across 114 teams to assess the respondents’ perception of exploitative leadership and SOE, and received 435 completed questionnaires. Two weeks later, we sent a follow-up questionnaire to the responding individuals to rate their negative emotions, and received 396 responses. After two additional weeks, we administered a questionnaire to the direct supervisors of these 396 employees to rate the employees’ workplace venting. In total, 344 matched employee–supervisor questionnaires (from 73 teams) were obtained, with a response rate of 59.72%. Findings-The results reveal that exploitative leadership is positively related to employee workplace venting; not only directly, but also indirectly, by facilitating negative emotions. In addition, SOE moderates the effects of exploitative leadership on negative emotions and employee workplace venting. Practical implications-Our findings suggest that organizations should pay more attention to the negative effects of exploitative leadership in the workplace. Further, managers should remind subordinates of the dark side of negative emotions related to employee workplace venting. and make an effort to reduce negative affect via internal communication channels or open discussions. Finally, the organization should strive to clarify the authority of leaders, correct and punish their improper behavior in a timely manner, and enhance the positive effect of SOE. Originality/value-This research identifies negative emotions as a key mediator that links exploitative leadership to employee’s workplace venting. It also highlights the moderating role of SOE in this relationship.
Article
Full-text available
Presents an integrative theoretical framework to explain and to predict psychological changes achieved by different modes of treatment. This theory states that psychological procedures, whatever their form, alter the level and strength of self-efficacy. It is hypothesized that expectations of personal efficacy determine whether coping behavior will be initiated, how much effort will be expended, and how long it will be sustained in the face of obstacles and aversive experiences. Persistence in activities that are subjectively threatening but in fact relatively safe produces, through experiences of mastery, further enhancement of self-efficacy and corresponding reductions in defensive behavior. In the proposed model, expectations of personal efficacy are derived from 4 principal sources of information: performance accomplishments, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and physiological states. Factors influencing the cognitive processing of efficacy information arise from enactive, vicarious, exhortative, and emotive sources. The differential power of diverse therapeutic procedures is analyzed in terms of the postulated cognitive mechanism of operation. Findings are reported from microanalyses of enactive, vicarious, and emotive modes of treatment that support the hypothesized relationship between perceived self-efficacy and behavioral changes. (21/2 p ref)
Article
Full-text available
Claims that attributions and their related behaviors may reflect a type of perceived control that is generally overlooked. People attempt to gain control by bringing the environment into line with their wishes (primary control) and by bringing themselves into line with environmental forces (secondary control). Four manifestations of secondary control are considered: (a) Attributions to severely limited ability can serve to enhance predictive control and protect against disappointment; (b) attributions to chance can reflect illusory control, since people often construe chance as a personal characteristic akin to an ability ("luck"); (c) attributions to powerful others permit vicarious control when the individual identifies with these others; and (d) the preceding attributions may foster interpretive control, in which the individual seeks to understand and derive meaning from otherwise uncontrollable events in order to accept them. (5½ p ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Data obtained from 375 members of a consumer panel in a two-phase study of consumer experiences with automobile repairs and services were used to examine the antecedents and consequences of consumer satisfaction. The results support previous findings that expectations and disconfirmation are plausible determinants of satisfaction, and suggest that complaint activity may be included in satisfaction/dissatisfaction research as suggested by earlier descriptions of consumer complaining behavior.
Article
Full-text available
Studied divergent perspectives of actors and Os in 3 situations. In Study 1 with 33 female undergraduate actor-O pairs, actors' cooperation with E's request was either elicited or prevented with different monetary incentives while Os watched. Os were found to assume that actors would behave in the future in ways similar to those they had witnessed (actors did not share this assumption). Study 2 found that 30 male undergraduates described their best friend's choice of girlfriend and college major in terms of the friend's dispositional qualities and described their own choices in terms of the characteristics of the major and girlfriend. A personality questionnaire indicating which of 3 descriptions best fit themselves and 4 other stimulus persons was administered to 24 male undergraduates in Study 3. It was found that Ss ascribe more personality traits to other people than to themselves. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
A review of the evidence for and against the proposition that self-serving biases affect attributions of causality indicates that there is little empirical support for the proposition in its most general form. Some support was found for the contention that individuals engage in self-enhancing attributions under conditions of success, but only minimal evidence suggested that individuals engage in self-protective attributions under conditions of failure. Moreover, it was proposed that the self-enhancing effect may not be due to motivational distortion, but rather to the tendency of people to (a) expect their behavior to produce success, (b) discern a closer covariation between behavior and outcomes in the case of increasing success than in the case of constant failure, and (c) misconstrue the meaning of contingency. (60 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Examines the empirical evidence related to the notion of self-serving biases in causal attributions. D. T. Miller and M. Ross's (see record 1975-21041-001) reinterpretations of data that presumably reflect bias are discussed. The studies reviewed show relatively strong support for the causal asymmetry generally cited as evidence for self-serving, or defensive, attributions. Futhermore, a broadened self-serving bias formulation is presented, which suggests that under certain conditions, esteem needs may be best served by making counterdefensive attributions. Conditions that may be expected to elicit defensive or counterdefensive attributions are delineated. (46 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
This paper addresses the issue of post-purchase processes of consumers who complain about purchase experiences. Hypotheses about complaining consumers' satisfaction or dissatisfaction with organizational response and their subsequent repurchase behavior are proposed and empirically tested using data from consumers who complained to a major oil company.
Article
A survey of consumer reactions to common purchases was conducted in 1975. Consumers perceive problems with many products and services, and voice complaints concerning about one-third of those problems. Third-party complaint processors play a very small role in buyer-seller disputes. Household status and type of problem influence perception of problems and choice of action or inaction. Satisfactory resolutions occur in somewhat more than half of voiced complaint cases. To increase voicing and fair handling of complaints, procedural changes at the buyer-seller level are suggested; to improve treatment of complaints that are not resolved at the buyer-seller level, improvements in community small claims courts are suggested.
Article
A bstract Do causal attributions serve the need to protect and / or enhance self‐esteem? In a recent review, Miller and Ross (1975) proposed that there is evidence for self‐serving effect in the attribution of success but not in the attribution of failure; and that this effect reflects biases in information‐processing rather than self‐esteem maintenance. The present review indicated that self‐serving effects for both success and failure are obtained in most but not all experimental paradigms. Processes which may suppress or even reverse the self‐serving effect were discussed. Most important, the examination of research in which self‐serving effects are obtained suggested that these attributions are better understood in motivational than in information‐processing terms.
Article
Using edited excerpts from actual negative and positive book reviews, this research examined the hypothesis that negative evaluators of intellectual products will be perceived as more intelligent than positive evaluators. The results strongly supported the hypothesis. Negative reviewers were perceived as more intelligent, competent, and expert than positive reviewers, even when the content of the positive review was independently judged as being of higher quality and greater forcefulness. At the same time, in accord with previous research, negative reviewers were perceived as significantly less likable than positive reviewers. The results on intelligence ratings are seen as bolstering the self-presentational explanation of the tendency shown by intellectually insecure individuals to be negatively critical. The present methodology is contrasted to that of previous research which obtained apparently contradictory results.