ArticlePublisher preview available

Evaluating the Speech of Younger and Older Adults: Age, Gender, and Speech Situation

SAGE Publications Inc
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

This study examines how listeners arrive at judgments of speech as irrelevant or off-topic (off-target). Older adults and college students evaluated a set of narratives ascribed to speakers differing in age and gender and presented as conversations or interviews.The results show that young and old adults bring different understandings of age and situation to the evaluation task. Older evaluators judged narratives more on-target than younger evaluators. Differences between evaluator age groups were also observed in the effects of speaker age and speech situation: Younger evaluators judged older speakers more on-target than younger speakers, but older evaluators did not; and younger evaluators judged speech in interviews more off-target than older evaluators did. However, both old and young evaluators judged female speakers more on-target than males. This study contributes to our understanding of the role of age stereotypes in evaluating speech, highlighting the listener’s role in constructing an interlocutor’s speech as off-target.
Evaluating the Speech of
Younger and Older Adults:
Age, Gender, and Speech
Situation
Christopher V. Odato1 and
Deborah Keller-Cohen1
Abstract
This study examines how listeners arrive at judgments of speech as irrelevant or
off-topic (off-target). Older adults and college students evaluated a set of narratives
ascribed to speakers differing in age and gender and presented as conversations or
interviews. The results show that young and old adults bring different understandings
of age and situation to the evaluation task. Older evaluators judged narratives more
on-target than younger evaluators. Differences between evaluator age groups were
also observed in the effects of speaker age and speech situation: Younger evaluators
judged older speakers more on-target than younger speakers, but older evaluators
did not; and younger evaluators judged speech in interviews more off-target than
older evaluators did. However, both old and young evaluators judged female speakers
more on-target than males. This study contributes to our understanding of the role
of age stereotypes in evaluating speech, highlighting the listener’s role in constructing
an interlocutor’s speech as off-target.
Keywords
aging, stereotypes, narrative, gender, speech situation
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Corresponding Author:
Christopher V. Odato, Department of Linguistics, 440 Lorch Hall, 611 Tappan St., University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Email: cvodato@umich.edu
Journal of Language and Social
Psychology
28(4) 457–475
© The Author(s) 2009
Reprints and permission: http://www.
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X09341954
http://jls.sagepub.com
... With respect to the perception of (linguistically induced) power in public speech, neither speakers' nor participants' gender seemed to play a role (Holtgraves & Lasky, 1999). In interview or conversation contributions, female participants in conversations were perceived as being more on topic (Odato & Keller-Cohen, 2009). We include speaker gender as control factor in our research. ...
... With respect to control variables, three-way interactions were established of speaker gender, participant gender, and framing on attitude toward the speech. Assuming that people like speakers to be on-topic, the main effect of female speakers being appreciated more than male speakers might be explained by women being perceived as more on-topic (Odato & Keller-Cohen, 2009). The three-way interaction indicating that female participants liked the female speaker better with positive framing, while the male participants liked the female speaker better with negative framing, might be explained by the finding that women favor positive over negative information, while men prefer negative over positive information (Sternadori & Wise, 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
Political campaign speeches are deemed influential in winning people’s minds and votes. While the language used in such speeches has often been credited with their impact, empirical research in this area is scarce. We report on two experiments investigating how language variables such as rhetorical schemes (e.g., contrast, list of three) and valence framing (using positive vs. negative words) affect immediate attention and consecutive information processing of political radio speeches. Experiment 1 measured immediate attention for radio speeches measured through moment-to-moment, self-report measures. Negative framing, compared with positive framing, increased immediate attention. Rhetorical schemes only increased attention in positively (but not in negatively) framed speeches. No effects on recall were found. In Experiment 2, immediate attention for similar radio speeches was measured through secondary task reaction times. Experiment 2 replicated the first experiment’s effects on attention, and also yielded recall effects. A multiple-mediator model showed that comprehensibility mediated effects of rhetorical schemes and framing on recall.
... Older adults have been found to produce more verbose and tangential language than younger adults, reflected in both objective measures (Arbuckle & Gold, 1993;Dennis & Hess, 2016;James, Burke, Austin, & Hulme, 1998) and listener ratings (Kavé & Nussbaum, 2012;Odato & Keller-Cohen, 2009;Trunk & Abrams, 2009). Some interpret this as a reflection of inhibitory deficits (e.g., Arbuckle & Gold, 1993), whereas others attribute it to a shift in communication goals from informational exchange to social connection (e.g., James et al., 1998;Trunk & Abrams, 2009). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Spoken language serves as a primary means of social interaction, but speech and language skills change with age, a potential source of age-related stereotyping. The goals of this study were to examine how accurately age could be estimated from language samples, to determine which speech and language cues were most informative, and to assess the impact of perceived age on judgments of the speakers' communication skills. Method We analyzed narratives from 84 speakers aged 30–89 years to identify age-related differences and compared these differences to factors affecting perceptions of age and communicative competence. Three groups of raters estimated the speakers' ages and judged the quality of their communication: 44 listeners listened to audio-recorded narratives, 51 readers read transcripts of the narratives, and 24 voice raters listened to 10-s samples of speech extracted from one of the narratives. Results Older speakers spoke more slowly but showed minimal linguistic differences compared to younger speakers. Speakers' ages were estimated quite accurately, even from 10-s samples. Estimates were largely based on cues available in the acoustic signal—speech rate and vocal characteristics—so listeners were more accurate than readers. However, an overreliance on these cues also contributed to overestimates of speakers' ages. Communication ratings were not strongly related to perceived age but were influenced by various aspects of speech and language. In particular, speakers who produced longer narratives and spoke more quickly were judged to be better communicators. Conclusion Speakers tend to be judged on relatively superficial aspects of spoken language, in part because age-related change is most evident at these levels. Implications of these findings for age-related theories of stereotyping and speech-language intervention are discussed.
Article
Background: Global coherence rating scales have been used by a number of researchers to examine spoken discourse in populations with and without acquired neurogenic communication disorders. The 4-point global coherence (GC) scale in the current study has demonstrated reliability and convergent validity. However, we have not yet established how a global coherence rating corresponds to functional communication. Aims: The current study explores the clinical meaningfulness of the 4-point GC rating scale. Survey questions and ratings were developed to examine discourse quality and functional coherence as perceived by untrained listeners. Ratings by untrained listeners were compared to trained discourse ratings using the established 4-point GC scale. Methods and Procedures: Twelve discourse samples, scored by a trained rater, were selected for the current study from a previously collected set of discourse transcripts. Transcripts were extended monologues in response to one of four possible open-ended questions that were re-recorded by the trained rater to remove any distracting features of the original recordings, such as articulatory errors. Twenty-four untrained listeners rated the discourse samples using a short questionnaire that included questions for each sample about: topic maintenance, inclusion of unnecessary information, and the listener level of interest and attention. Questions for untrained listeners were based on operational definitions of global coherence and discourse quality respectively. These untrained ratings were compared to trained ratings of global coherence. Outcome measures were compared using non-parametric tests and a Spearman Rank Order test was also used to examine relationships among variables. Main Contribution: Untrained listeners’ ratings for topic maintenance and inclusion of unnecessary information were significantly different between trained low, medium, and high global coherence ratings. Topic maintenance and inclusion of unnecessary information were also both significantly correlated with global coherence. Untrained listeners’ ratings of their level of interest and attention for a sample were significantly different between trained medium-high and low-high global coherence ratings. Interest and attention ratings were also significantly correlated with ratings of global coherence. Conclusions: Untrained raters did differentiate between levels of global coherence using ratings of topic maintenance, inclusion of unnecessary information, and their level of attention and interest. Global coherence was also significantly correlated with the untrained ratings. These findings provide preliminary external validity for the global coherence scale and support its clinical utility.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter explores important parameters of intergenerational communication, with a focus on older people being targets of overaccommodation, also known variously across studies as patronizing talk, elder speak, or infantilizing talk. The latter are considered as (interchangeable) forms in that they can be subsumed under or treated as exemplars of the more superordinate category of over accommodative moves. Overaccommodation is a construct derived from communication accommodation theory that has been operationalized in terms of a speaker perceiving to exceed or overshoot the level of implementation of communicative behaviors necessary for a smooth and successful interaction. The chapter begins with considering the different forms overaccommodation can take. Following this, it sheds light on its social effects and describes the variable ways it can be managed by recipients. It also presents the theoretical mechanisms proposed to underlie this process. Furthermore, it considers other forms problematic intergenerational communication may, including elderly-to-young overaccommodation, painful self disclosures, and off-target verbosity. Finally and consequentially, this chapter concludes with a discussion of how communicative practices are endemic in the social construction of successful and unsuccessful aging.
Article
This study asks two questions: (1) Do older adults modify their language based on age of the listener (audience design)? (2) Does social contact affect audience design in older adults? Older adults (n = 34; mean age = 82) engaged in an instructions task with two fictive listeners (a child and an adult) to test these questions. Results show that older adults used a greater total number of propositions and rapport-building devices and a lower type-token ratio when giving instructions to the child compared to the adult listener. Adults with more social interactions used more propositions when talking to a child. In addition, satisfaction with interactions was significantly positively related to task-tracking devices and negatively related to rapport-building devices by older adults. These results suggest that audience design and social relations are worth further study in language maintenance in older age. © The Author(s) 2014.
Chapter
Along with race and gender, people commonly use age to categorize—and form stereotypes about—others. Of the three categories, age is the only one in which the members of the in-group (the young) will eventually join the out-group (the old). Although ageism is found cross-culturally, it is especially prevalent in the United States, where most people regard growing older with depression, fear, and anxiety. Older people in the United States are stigmatized and marginalized, with often devastating consequences. Although researchers have paid a great deal of attention to racism and sexism, there has been a dearth of research on ageism. A major reason for this neglect is that age prejudice is still considered socially acceptable. As baby boomers approach retirement age, however, there has been increased academic and popular interest in aging. This volume presents the current thinking on age stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination by researchers in gerontology, psychology, sociology, and communication. The book presents theoretical and empirical findings on the origins and effects of ageism, as well as suggestions on how to reduce ageism for the approaching "graying of America." Bradford Books imprint
Chapter
The theory of accommodation is concerned with motivations underlying and consequences arising from ways in which we adapt our language and communication patterns toward others. Since accommodation theory's emergence in the early l970s, it has attracted empirical attention across many disciplines and has been elaborated and expanded many times. In Contexts of Accommodation, accommodation theory is presented as a basis for sociolinguistic explanation, and it is the applied perspective that predominates this edited collection. The book seeks to demonstrate how the core concepts and relationships invoked by accommodation theory are available for addressing altogether pragmatic concerns. Accommodative processes can, for example, facilitate or impede language learners' proficiency in a second language as well as immigrants' acceptance into certain host communities; affect audience ratings and thereby the life of a television program; affect reaction to defendants in court and hence the nature of the judicial outcome; and be an enabling or detrimental force in allowing handicapped people to fulfil their communicative potential. Contexts of Accommodation will appeal to researchers and advanced students in language and communication sciences, as well as to sociolinguists, anthropologists, sociologists and psychologists.
Book
Since the publication of Ericsson and Simon's ground-breaking work in the early 1980s, verbal data has been used increasingly to study cognitive processes in many areas of psychology, and concurrent and retrospective verbal reports are now generally accepted as important sources of data on subjects' cognitive processes in specific tasks. In this revised edition of the book that first put protocol analysis on firm theoretical ground, the authors review major advances in verbal reports over the past decade, including new evidence on how giving verbal reports affects subjects' cognitive processes, and on the validity and completeness of such reports. In a substantial new preface Ericsson and Simon summarize the central issues covered in the book and provide an updated version of their information-processing model, which explains verbalization and verbal reports. They describe new studies on the effects of verbalization, interpreting the results of these studies and showing how their theory can be extended to account for them. Next, they address the issue of completeness of verbally reported information, reviewing the new evidence in three particularly active task domains. They conclude by citing recent contributions to the techniques for encoding protocols, raising general issues, and proposing directions for future research. All references and indexes have been updated. Bradford Books imprint
Chapter
Research shows that older persons have generally lower levels of processing resources (e.g., working memory capacity, processing speed) and that these processing limitations have a negative impact on language production/comprehension in older persons. On the other hand, the practical communication competence of older persons shows either no age-related deficit or better performance than that of younger people. This chapter first reviews the literature establishing age-related language processing deficits and that on age-related language competence. It then examines how social knowledge may serve to counteract the impact of processing limitations on communication competence in aging. In particular, research on age-related differences in the complexity of age stereotype schemas is reviewed along with that investigating age-related differences in the production of competent persuasive messages to older targets. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the implications for processing limitations research.