A preview of this full-text is provided by SAGE Publications Inc.
Content available from Journal of Language and Social Psychology
This content is subject to copyright.
Evaluating the Speech of
Younger and Older Adults:
Age, Gender, and Speech
Situation
Christopher V. Odato1 and
Deborah Keller-Cohen1
Abstract
This study examines how listeners arrive at judgments of speech as irrelevant or
off-topic (off-target). Older adults and college students evaluated a set of narratives
ascribed to speakers differing in age and gender and presented as conversations or
interviews. The results show that young and old adults bring different understandings
of age and situation to the evaluation task. Older evaluators judged narratives more
on-target than younger evaluators. Differences between evaluator age groups were
also observed in the effects of speaker age and speech situation: Younger evaluators
judged older speakers more on-target than younger speakers, but older evaluators
did not; and younger evaluators judged speech in interviews more off-target than
older evaluators did. However, both old and young evaluators judged female speakers
more on-target than males. This study contributes to our understanding of the role
of age stereotypes in evaluating speech, highlighting the listener’s role in constructing
an interlocutor’s speech as off-target.
Keywords
aging, stereotypes, narrative, gender, speech situation
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Corresponding Author:
Christopher V. Odato, Department of Linguistics, 440 Lorch Hall, 611 Tappan St., University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Email: cvodato@umich.edu
Journal of Language and Social
Psychology
28(4) 457–475
© The Author(s) 2009
Reprints and permission: http://www.
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X09341954
http://jls.sagepub.com