This chapter considers the frictions between status quo and change with reference to three recent theatrical works that offer images of Northern Ireland. Stacey Gregg’s Shibboleth (2015), David Ireland’s Cyprus Avenue (2016), and Jez Butterworth’s The Ferryman (2017) vividly illustrate some of the intricate and, at times, counterintuitive, ways in which Northern Ireland in the second decade of the twenty-first century remains an overdetermined site of ambivalent affects and negative attachments, in a cultural discourse now further inflected by Brexit. At the opening of the chapter, I look to Seamus Heaney’s 1975 poem “Act of Union” as a paradigmatic example of the tropes that congeal around the North. In the ensuing decades, the narrative of the North as a dysphoric site of grim tribalism, atavistic violence, paranoia and perpetual conflict became deeply etched in the cultural and political discourse, so much so that in an essay published in 2001, Ronan McDonald warned that “The central danger of all writing about the Troubles is the danger of cliché” (233).
It is now more than twenty years since the Good Friday Agreement proposed a new narrative for Northern Ireland. In the post-Agreement context the challenges of imagining a cultural space that is not predetermined by political violence and sectarianism, while still respecting the legacy of the Troubles, are complex and ongoing. I explore how Shibboleth, Cyprus Avenue and The Ferryman each refract the ambivalences of the affective patterning of the North. All three share a temporal zone in the political penumbras of post-Agreement governance and Brexit, their production contexts overlap unevenly in several ways: Shibboleth and Cyprus Avenue both opened on the Peacock Stage at the Abbey Theatre in Dublin; The Ferryman was produced and Cyprus Avenue was co-produced by the Royal Court Theatre, London, and both transferred to highly successful West End and New York runs. They invite audiences to think and feel in particular ways that are freighted with political implications. My analysis of their affective textures draws on Birte Heidemann’s theorising of the North’s negative liminality, Stefanie Lehner’s work on transformative aesthetics and memory, and Sianne Ngai’s reflections on the aesthetics of negative emotions. Using these frames, I investigate how the tangle of “dysphoric affects” (3) that adheres to the North continues to find expression. In particular, I propose that Ngai’s notion of “animatedness” with its racialised aspect, elucidates the politics of powerlessness and agency embedded in these plays, and how they reproduce and restructure the tropes associated with a Northern Irish imaginary. Finally, it is not a little ironic that of the three, the two plays with the highest public profiles, greeted with the strongest public acclaim, offer an intoxicating blend of “dysphoric affects” (Ngai 3) that arguably reify rather than deconstruct the set pieces of Northern Irish exoticism, violence and extravagant temperamentality.