ArticlePublisher preview available

Core Competencies in Hospital Pharmacy Practice: Department Financial Management

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

This series of articles in the Director's Forum continue to review key core competencies necessary for a pharmacy department to define their value in patient care. Competencies of medication order review, medication order dispensing, preparing intravenous admixtures, and data management provide a foundation in patient centered services. The goal of the Director's Forum throughout 2006 is to provide readers with information on all of the necessary core competencies of hospital pharmacy practice, comprising a “toolkit” in establishing a patient-centered pharmacy department.
This content is subject to copyright.
Hospital Pharmacy 689
Director's Forum
Hospitals and health care
organizations depend on
data and information to
manage clinical care and opera-
tions. For example, hospitals use
information and data to project
and track their revenue and
expenses and to establish appro-
priate patient care programs. All
hospitals have a financial respon-
sibility to their respective gover-
nance to monitor both costs and
quality, and publish information
internally and externally. Impor-
tantly, the yearly budgeting
process in hospitals is solely
dependent on information on
financial performance from the
previous year along with projected
expenses for additional programs
for the upcoming budget year.
Managing the finances of a
pharmacy department is not a sta-
tic process of calculating the year-
ly budget and writing variance
reports to explain budget discrep-
ancies. Financial management of a
pharmacy department is a dynam-
ic process that adapts to changing
environments within the organiza-
tion. The pharmacy director must
be able to quickly and effectively
assess and use financial informa-
tion to maintain the department’s
ability to meet the strategic goals
of their organization.
Every hospital pharmacy
director must have the ability to
analyze and measure the financial
performance of a pharmacy
department on a daily, weekly,
monthly, and yearly basis. In fact,
a less experienced or new pharma-
cy director may have little or no
experience in the financial man-
agement of a department. Their
thorough understanding of finan-
cial details of a pharmacy may
determine their success as a
department head.1
Close monitoring of a depart-
ment’s finances may seem like a
daunting task; the key to this close
monitoring is to use information
from various sources in the hospi-
tal and develop a system for con-
sistently reviewing and acting
upon information. An analogy
that applies to managing a hospi-
tal pharmacy’s finances in real-
time is how most hospitals
respond to sentinel events. All hos-
pitals have access to specific infor-
mation through their reporting
systems that provides them with
data to make decisions and
improvements in care to prevent
serious errors. This same philoso-
phy should apply to the finances
of the pharmacy department, with
information being readily accessi-
ble and easily analyzed to promote
effective decision making.
This article reviews fundamen-
tal concepts in managing the
financial aspects of a hospital
pharmacy department. The goal of
this article is to provide hospital
pharmacy directors with a summa-
ry and explanation of steps and
strategies in hospital pharmacy
financial management. The specif-
ic aims of this article are to (1)
describe a dynamic approach to
financial management that pro-
motes patient-centered services;
(2) review specific information
and steps to monitor the financial
performance of the department;
(3) describe a proactive approach
used by the University of Pitts-
burgh Medical Center (UPMC) to
manage drug expenses. Hopefully,
the lessons learned from this arti-
cle can be applied to establish a
system for financial management
that promotes a patient-centered
Hospital Pharmacy
Volume 41, Number 7, pp 689–694
2006 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Core Competencies in Hospital Pharmacy Practice:
Department Financial Management
Robert J. Weber, MS, FASHP*
*Associate Professor and Department Chair, University of Pittsburgh School of Phar-
macy, Executive Director of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pitts-
burgh, PA.
This series of articles in the Director’s Forum continue to review key core
competencies necessary for a pharmacy department to define their value
in patient care. Competencies of medication order review, medication
order dispensing, preparing intravenous admixtures, and data manage-
ment provide a foundation in patient centered services. The goal of the
Director’s Forum throughout 2006 is to provide readers with information
on all of the necessary core competencies of hospital pharmacy practice,
comprising a “toolkit” in establishing a patient-centered pharmacy
department.
... 1 Inpatient hospital pharmacies are estimated to account for between 7% and 10% of a hospitals' total operating cost. 2 According to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the largest portion of any inpatient hospital pharmacy budget is medication cost, 3 representing ϳ80% of the total pharmacy budget. 2 The high cost of medication incurred by the hospital, representing between 5.6% and 8% of the total hospital budget, substantially contributes to the total cost of inpatient care. ...
... 1 Inpatient hospital pharmacies are estimated to account for between 7% and 10% of a hospitals' total operating cost. 2 According to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the largest portion of any inpatient hospital pharmacy budget is medication cost, 3 representing ϳ80% of the total pharmacy budget. 2 The high cost of medication incurred by the hospital, representing between 5.6% and 8% of the total hospital budget, substantially contributes to the total cost of inpatient care. ...
Article
Full-text available
Many patients receive intravenous (IV) medication while clinically eligible for oral (PO) medication intake, which represents a potential for safety improvement and substantial medication cost reduction. We analyzed the potential hospital medication budget impact associated with converting from IV to PO administration of 4 targeted IV medications, each representing a different class of drug, when patients were clinically eligible for PO medication intake. Chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, and pantoprazole were identified as 4 costly IV medications with highly bioavailable PO equivalents. Data were extracted from the computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system at Johns Hopkins Hospital and analyzed to determine the doses administered of the 4 identified IV medications, while patients were concurrently receiving PO intake. More than two thirds of adult inpatients were administered IV chlorothiazide, voriconazole, levetiracetam, or pantoprazole while concurrently receiving PO intake. This use of expensive IV medications rather than PO equivalents in patients eligible for PO medication intake added $1,166,759.70 to the yearly cost of care at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Efforts to remind physicians to convert patient orders from IV to PO medications in patients eligible for PO medication intake could have a considerable impact on the total cost of health care.
... As a result, the major financial focus is the pharmacy's director who must be controlling the department's drug and personnel expenses. 24 In economic evaluation of clinical pharmacy services using cost analysis and outcome most studies showed positive financial benefits of the evaluated pharmacy service. 25 One important indicator is to break the equal analysis, which is the point at which income and expenses are exactly equal. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Nowadays, by the increasing of the pharmaceutical expenditure the health system in all countries has gone under pressure. Thus, a process must be provided to assess the financial performance of this industry as it is essential to ensure that the limited resources are spent for the best advantages. Objectives: This study aimed to review indicators for evaluating the economic and financial performance of pharmacies. Methods: A systematic literature research was conducted using seven different search engines and electronic databases (PubMed, EBESCO, Ovid, ProQuest, springer, Science Direct, Scopus) until March 2014 without any time limitation. Inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, and the studies that focused on financial or economical scopes of pharmacy services. Studies that evaluated only clinical or humanistic performance of the pharmacy without an economic and financial assessment and also studies presented in seminars or conferences and letter to editor were excluded from the study. Selected studies were examined carefully, and their results were summarized via Extraction Table. Results: finally, 15 articles were chosen from 1437 articles. After assessment of articles, 108 financial and economic indicators selected for evaluating pharmacy's performance. Some indicators were: current ratio, cash ratio, total asset turnover, Net Profit Percentage (NPP). Finally, the financial and economic indicators were divided into three scopes: input, process and output indicators. Conclusion: for evaluating pharmacy's performance, valid financial and economic indicators are required. The financial and economic indicators which had been summarized and sorted in our study can be applied by any country for codifying their local indicators.
... As stated previously in the Director's Forum column, hospital pharmacy costs represent approximately 7% to 10% of a hospital's operating budget and pharmacy personnel account for nearly 20% of the pharmacy budget. 1 Medication errors significantly affect patient safety, particularly those that occur in the pharmacy dispensing process. The traditional systempharmacy dispensing in which a pharmacy technician fills a medication order and a pharmacist verifies its accuracy-is prone to error. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Director's Forum series is written and edited by Michael Sanborn and Robert Weber and is designed for guiding pharmacy leaders in establishing patient-centered services in hospitals and health systems. Another specific goal of this column is addressing many of the key challenges that pharmacy directors currently face, while also providing information that will foster growth in pharmacy leadership and patient safety. Previous Director's Forum articles have discussed various aspects of pharmacy technology implementation and utilization. This feature reviews the steps and strategies for implementing and evaluating automation in a central pharmacy area supporting a decentralized pharmaceutical model.
... As stated previously in the Director's Forum column, hospital pharmacy costs represent approximately 7% to 10% of a hospital's operating budget and pharmacy personnel account for nearly 20% of the pharmacy budget. 1 Medication errors significantly affect patient safety, particularly those that occur in the pharmacy dispensing process. The traditional systempharmacy dispensing in which a pharmacy technician fills a medication order and a pharmacist verifies its accuracy-is prone to error. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pharmacy directors are faced with a myriad of options when it comes to unit dose automation. The goal of this Director' Forum article is to outline the most common types of automation available, summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each, and review considerations surrounding optimization, maintenance, and patient safety.
... Stewardship programs also have a financial responsibility in the course of providing optimal patient care [6]. From an institutional perspective, antimicrobials can account for up to 30% of a hospital's pharmacy budget [7], with inpatient pharmacies estimated to account for between 7% and 10% of a hospital's total operating cost [8]. A recent article on drug expenditures for nonfederal hospitals found that systemic anti-infectives rank third in drug expenditures preceded only by antineoplastic agents and hemostatic modifiers [9]. ...
Article
A new antimicrobial stewardship program can be overwhelmed at the breadth of interventions and education required to conduct a successful program. The expression “low-hanging fruit,” in reference to stewardship, refers to selecting the most obtainable targets rather than confronting more complicated management issues. These targets include intravenous-to-oral conversions, batching of intravenous antimicrobials, therapeutic substitutions, and formulary restriction. These strategies require fewer resources and less effort than other stewardship activities; however, they are applicable to a variety of healthcare settings, including limited-resource hospitals, and have demonstrated significant financial savings. Our stewardship program found that staged and systematic interventions that focus on obvious areas of need, that is, low hanging fruit, provided early successes in our expanded program with a substantial cumulative cost savings of $832 590.
Article
Full-text available
A strategic approach to improving the medication-use process in health systems by using a framework for setting priorities on the basis of feasibility, the potential for financial return, and the effect on quality and safety is described. A panel consisting of leaders in health-system pharmacy identified seven dimensions of high-performance pharmacy (HPP) framework: medication preparation and delivery, patient care services, medication safety, medication-use policy, financial performance, human resources, and education. Performance elements, which are specific policies, procedures, activities, and practices that indicate high performance and result in a financial or clinical return on investment of resources, within each dimension were identified. References, practice standards, and policies related to each performance element were also identified. By consensus, the panel assigned qualitative metric scores for each of the 69 performance elements that represent the panel's assessment of the resources necessary to achieve full implementation of the element and the potential financial and quality and safety returns if the element has not yet been implemented. It is noted that a pharmacy department's actual outlay of resources and expected financial return will differ depending on the size of the health system, the size of pharmacy staff, and the extent of previous implementation efforts. The framework can also be used to rejustify existing services and programs and identify opportunities for improvement. The HPP framework characterizes pharmacy performance elements on the basis of feasibility, financial return, and effect on quality and safety. The framework provides pharmacists with a means to establish priorities in improving the medication-use system.
Article
Full-text available
Pharmacy directors are faced with a myriad of options when it comes to unit dose automation. The goal of this Director' Forum article is to outline the most common types of automation available, summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each, and review considerations surrounding optimization, maintenance, and patient safety.
Article
Full-text available
Results of the 2007 ASHP national survey on informatics are presented. All types and sizes of hospitals in the United States were included in the sample of 4112 pharmacy directors surveyed using an online data collection tool. The survey included over 300 data elements and was designed to assess the adoption and use of pharmacy informatics and technology within the medication-use process. In this national probability sample survey, the response rate was 25.9%. Hospitals appear to be moving toward an enterprise approach to information technology adoption and away from a best-of-breed approach. Although nearly half of hospitals have components of an electronic medical record (EMR), a complete digital hospital with a fully implemented EMR is far in the future, with only 5.9% of hospitals being fully digital (without paper records). An estimated 12.0% of hospitals use computerized prescriber-order-entry systems with decision support, 24.1% use bar-code medication administration, and 44.0% use intelligent infusion devices (smart pumps). Many of these technologies were not optimally configured, and significant advances must be made for hospitals to fully realize the benefits of these technologies. Hospitals have implemented many technologies in drug distribution, with 82.8% of hospitals having automated dispensing cabinets, 10.1% having robots, and 12.7% having carousel systems to manage inventory. Finally, most hospitals reported plans to adopt most of these technologies. This survey found that informatics and medication-use system technologies are widely present in all steps of the medication-use process. These technologies touch all health care professionals in the hospital and demonstrate the significant responsibility the pharmacy department holds for these technologies.
Article
Full-text available
Many dispensing errors made in hospital pharmacies can harm patients. Some hospitals are investing in bar code technology to reduce these errors, but data about its efficacy are limited. To evaluate whether implementation of bar code technology reduced dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events (ADEs). Before-and-after study using direct observations. Hospital pharmacy at a 735-bed tertiary care academic medical center. A bar code-assisted dispensing system was implemented in 3 configurations. In 2 configurations, all doses were scanned once during the dispensing process. In the third configuration, only 1 dose was scanned if several doses of the same medication were being dispensed. Target dispensing errors, defined as dispensing errors that bar code technology was designed to address, and target potential ADEs, defined as target dispensing errors that can harm patients. In the pre- and post-bar code implementation periods, the authors observed 115,164 and 253,984 dispensed medication doses, respectively. Overall, the rates of target potential ADEs and all potential ADEs decreased by 74% and 63%, respectively. Of the 3 configurations of bar code technology studied, the 2 configurations that required staff to scan all doses had a 93% to 96% relative reduction in the incidence of target dispensing errors (P < 0.001) and 86% to 97% relative reduction in the incidence of potential ADEs (P < 0.001). However, the configuration that did not require scanning of every dose had only a 60% relative reduction in the incidence of target dispensing errors (P < 0.001) and an increased (by 2.4-fold) incidence of target potential ADEs (P = 0.014). There were several potentially life-threatening ADEs involving intravenous dopamine and intravenous heparin in that configuration. The authors used surrogate outcomes; did not mask assessors to the purpose of study; and excluded the controlled substance fill process (a process with low error rates at baseline) from the study, which may bias the combined decrease in error rates toward a larger magnitude. The overall rates of dispensing errors and potential ADEs substantially decreased after implementing bar code technology. However, the technology should be configured to scan every dose during the dispensing process.
Article
Purpose This project deployed pharmacist and technician teams on patient care units to improve (1) the quality of the medication process and (2) nurse satisfaction with pharmacy services. Methods An interdisciplinary team developed a decentralized pharmacy model, establishing complimentary roles for pharmacists and technicians based on their current roles, expected roles, and published evidence. A trained nurse or pharmacist observed the medication process before and after implementing the service model; nurses were surveyed for satisfaction with pharmacy services. Statistical analysis of changes in order-processing times and nurse satisfaction were determined using an independent samples t-test (CI = 0.95, P < 0.05). Results Two processes were significantly improved before after implementing the decentralized model (PRE vs POST): (1) order entry time, PRE 24.4 ± 18.1 min (Mean ± SD) vs POST 12.1 ± 10.5 min, P = 0.001; (2) order delivery time, PRE 50.5 ± 18.9 min vs POST 27.5 ± 15.2 min, P = 0.048. Nursing satisfaction significantly improved after implementation of the decentralized model, specifically in perception of quality, PRE (Median score = 3) vs POST (Median score = 4), P = 0.04, timely delivery of STAT and routine medications PRE (Median score = 2) vs POST (Median Score = 4, P = 0.00, pharmacy as an asset to patient care PRE (Median score = 3) vs POST (Median Score = 5), P = 0.04, and effective pharmacy and nursing communication PRE (Median score = 2) vs POST (Median Score = 4), P = 0.04. Pharmacists increased their medication safety interventions and documentation almost five-fold. Conclusions Pharmacist-technician teams on the patient care units improved service and nurse satisfaction and may be a useful method for decentralizing pharmacy services in hospitals that do not have satellites.
Article
Drug-cost projections for 2002 and factors likely to influence drug costs are discussed. The United States continues to face the challenge of increased growth in health expenditures, and pharmaceutical expenditures continue to increase significantly faster than the growth in total health care expenditures. These increases can be largely attributed to a combination of general inflation, an increase in the average age of the U.S. population, and the increased use of new technologies. On the basis of price inflation and nonprice inflationary factors, including increases in volume, shifts in patient and therapeutic intensity, and the expected approval of new drugs, we forecast a 15.5% increase in drug expenditures in 2002 for hospitals and clinics and an 18.5% increase for ambulatory care settings. One of the most substantial contributors to the rise in pharmaceutical expenditures over the past decade is the successful introduction and rapid diffusion of new pharmaceuticals. Data about many new drugs on the horizon are provided. One agent likely to have the highest impact on hospitals in the next year is drotrecogin alfa for the treatment of sepsis. The cost of this agent is expected to range from 3,000to3,000 to 10,000 per patient per course of therapy. Other factors influencing medication costs, including generic medications, legislative initiatives, and the recent acts of terrorism committed against the United States, are also discussed. Technological, demographic, and market-based changes, and possibly public policy changes, will have a dramatic influence on pharmaceutical expenditures in the coming year. An understanding of what is driving the changes is critical to the effective management of these resources.
Article
Interviewing for a director of pharmacy position is discussed, and recommended activities for a pharmacy director's first six months on the job are described. A prospective pharmacy director should first target the specific positions available that best fit his or her skills. The individual should tour the hospital and the pharmacy for each position of interest. Interviews should include the pharmacy staff, the nursing staff, the direct-report manager, and the medical staff. The hospital's financial condition should be assessed and a postinterview analysis conducted. Once hired, the new director should devote the first three months to an assessment of pharmacy services, staff, and customers; a regulatory and accreditation review; and assessments of organizational leadership, information systems, and clinical services. In addition, key documents, such as hospital policies and procedures, should be reviewed. At the end of the first three months, two documents, a summary of the new director's initial assessments and a chart showing current workflow, should be completed. Tasks for the first six months on the job include devising a work plan to address issues, developing reporting systems and metrics, setting priorities, creating staffing and clinical plans, promoting staff development creating and revising procedures, and evaluating outsourcing needs. The director should take a moment from time to time to celebrate successes with the staff. The director of pharmacy has one of the most complex jobs in the hospital. Planning, communicating, networking, writing, listening, leading, and motivating are skills necessary for success.
Article
Hospital pharmacies dispense large numbers of medication doses for hospitalized patients. A study was conducted at an academic tertiary care hospital to characterize the incidence and severity of medication dispensing errors in a hospital pharmacy. Direct observation of dispensing processes was undertaken to determine presence of errors with review by a physician panel to determine severity. A total of 140,755 medication doses filled by pharmacy technicians were observed during a seven-month period, and 3.6% (5075) contalned errors. The hospital pharmacist detected only 79% of these errors during routine verification; thus, 0.75% of doses filled would have left the phannacy with undetected errors. Overall, 23.5% of undetected errors were potential adverse drug events (ADEs), of which 28% were serious and 0.8% were life threatening. The most common potential ADEs were incorrect medications (36%), incorrect strength (35%), and incorrect dosage form (21%). Given the volume of medications dispensed, even a low rate of drug distribution process translates into a large number of errors with potential to harm patients. Pharmacy distribution systems require further process redesign to achieve the highest possible level of safety and reliability.
Article
Over the past several months, we have heard reports of medication errors involving pharmacy technicians that have led to serious injury or death. In some cases, the technicians or supervising pharmacists were terminated from their positions. Moreover, the institutions in which the incidents occurred
Article
A study was conducted to determine filling and dispensing error rates before and after the implementation of an automated pharmacy carousel system (APCS). The study was conducted in a 613-bed acute and tertiary care university hospital. Before the implementation of the APCS, filling and dispensing rates were recorded during October through November 2004 and January 2005. Postimplementation data were collected during May through June 2006. Errors were recorded in three areas of pharmacy operations: first-dose or missing medication fill, automated dispensing cabinet fill, and interdepartmental request fill. A filling error was defined as an error caught by a pharmacist during the verification step. A dispensing error was defined as an error caught by a pharmacist observer after verification by the pharmacist. Before implementation of the APCS, 422 first-dose or missing medication orders were observed between October 2004 and January 2005. Independent data collected in December 2005, approximately six weeks after the introduction of the APCS, found that filling and error rates had increased. The filling rate for automated dispensing cabinets was associated with the largest decrease in errors. Filling and dispensing error rates had decreased by December 2005. In terms of interdepartmental request fill, no dispensing errors were noted in 123 clinic orders dispensed before the implementation of the APCS. One dispensing error out of 85 clinic orders was identified after implementation of the APCS. The implementation of an APCS at a university hospital decreased medication filling errors related to automated cabinets only and did not affect other filling and dispensing errors.