ArticlePDF Available
Article
Full-text available
Numerosas investigaciones han descrito la relación entre elementos espirituales y religiosos y salud mental, como también la necesidad de incluirlos en la práctica clínica. Sin embargo, las comprensiones de espiritualidad y religiosidad han variado durante las últimas décadas y así también sus formas de evaluación. En este artículo se presenta una revisión de la literatura disponible acerca de instrumentos para evaluar elementos espirituales y religiosos en población general y clínica. La búsqueda se realizó por medio de metabuscadores, según los criterios de inclusión y exclusión planteados por Monod et al. (2011) en una revisión similar. Resultados. 23 instrumentos cumplieron con los criterios requeridos, 10 de los cuales fueron diseñados para población general y 13 para poblaciones clínicas o grupos específicos. El número de instrumentos existentes ha aumentado en los últimos años, todos están disponibles en inglés y fueron diseñados para poblaciones adultas. No se encontraron escalas validadas en español, ni para población chilena en los últimos 20 años. Existen más instrumentos que evalúan la espiritualidad por sobre la religiosidad y, además, se evidencia una estrecha relación entre los conceptos de espiritualidad y bienestar subjetivo. Conclusiones. El interés por evaluar e investigar los elementos ER y su relación con la salud y el bienestar general por medio de instrumentos estan-darizados mantiene plena vigencia. Sin embargo, las concepciones de espiritualidad y religiosidad, y su relación con el bienestar general, se han ido estrechando, hecho que se evidencia en las formas de evaluación desarrolladas más recientemente.
Article
Full-text available
Empirical studies have identified significant links between religion and spirituality and health. The reasons for these associations, however, are unclear. Typically, religion and spirituality have been measured by global indices (e.g., frequency of church attendance, self-rated religiousness and spirituality) that do not specify how or why religion and spirituality affect health. The authors highlight recent advances in the delineation of religion and spirituality concepts and measures theoretically and functionally connected to health. They also point to areas for areas for growth in religion and spirituality conceptualization and measurement. Through measures of religion and spirituality more conceptually related to physical and mental health (e.g., closeness to God, religious orientation and motivation, religious support, religious struggle), psychologists are discovering more about the distinctive contributions of religiousness and spirituality to health and well-being.
Article
Full-text available
The authors review evidence regarding the biological processes that may link religiosity/spirituality to health. A growing body of observational evidence supports the hypothesis that links religiosity/spirituality to physiological processes. Although much of the earliest evidence came from cross-sectional studies with questionable generalizability and potential confounding, more recent research, with more representative samples and multivariate analysis, provides stronger evidence linking Judeo-Christian religious practices to blood pressure and immune function. The strongest evidence comes from randomized interventional trials reporting the beneficial physiological impact of meditation (primarily transcendental meditation). Overall, available evidence is generally consistent with the hypothesis that religiosity/spirituality is linked to health-related physiological processes--including cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and immune function--althogh more solid evidence is needed.
Article
Mounting evidence of the relationship between spirituality and positive health outcomes has made the assessment of spirituality an important consideration for health care professionals. Current instruments fail to capture the emerging knowledge and multiple expressions of this complex construct. The Spirituality Scale (SS) is a researcher-developed instrument that attempts to assess the human spiritual dimension as it is manifested in adult populations. The instrument is a 38-item questionnaire in a Likert-type format. Items were generated to measure four conceptualized domains of spirituality. The purpose of this study was to develop, refine, and evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the SS. Psychometric analysis of the SS provided strong evidence of the reliability and validity of the instrument. Principal factor analysis revealed a meaningful 3-factor solution explaining 57% of the variance. Reliability estimates ranged from .81-.94 for the subscales and .94 for the total instrument. Test re-test reliability with a subgroup of 30 participants was .85. Three factors of spirituality supportive of the theoretical framework were identified: Self-Discovery, Relationships, and Eco-Awareness. The SS uniquely contributes to the emerging understanding of spirituality by introducing the subscale of eco-awareness and offers several conceptual, methodological, and pragmatic advantages over other current instruments. These findings can assist in facilitating the inclusion of spirituality in healthcare and have the potential to provide a transforming vision for nursing care and a vehicle to evoking optimal patient outcomes.
Article
The purpose of this study was to develop, refine, and evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Spirituality Scale (SS). The SS is a holistic instrument that attempts to measure the beliefs, intuitions, lifestyle choices, practices, and rituals representative of the human spiritual dimension and is designed to guide spiritual interventions. A researcher-developed instrument was designed to assess spirituality from a holistic perspective. Items were generated to measure four conceptualized domains of spirituality. The SS was completed by 240 adults with chronic illness. Psychometric analysis of the SS provided strong evidence of the reliability and validity of the instrument. Three factors of spirituality that supported the theoretical framework were identified: Self-Discovery, Relationships, and Eco-Awareness. These findings can assist in facilitating the inclusion of spirituality in health care and have the potential to provide a transforming vision for nursing care and a vehicle to evoking optimal patient outcomes.