Article

Evidence for remembering when events occurred in a rodent model of episodic memory

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 06/2009; 106(23):9525-9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904360106
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The content of episodic memory consists of representations of unique past events. Episodic memories are grounded in a temporal framework (i.e., we remember when an event occurred). It has recently been argued that episodic-like memory in rats is qualitatively different from human episodic memory because, rather than remembering when an earlier past event occurred, rats used the cue of how long ago it occurred. We asked, therefore, whether rats remember the time of day at which they encountered a distinctive event, in addition to what occurred and where it happened. Rats were tested in the morning and afternoon, on separate days. A distinctive flavor (chocolate) was replenished at a daily-unique location at only one of these times. The interval between first and second daily opportunities to eat (study and test, respectively) was constant. Rats adjusted their revisits to the chocolate location at different times of day by using time of day rather than the cue of how long ago an event occurred. Two lines of evidence suggest that rats remembered the time at which the distinctive event occurred. First, under conditions in which the time of test (but not time of study) was novel, rats immediately transferred their knowledge of the chocolate contingency to the new test time. Second, under conditions in which predictions for study and test times were put in conflict, rats again used study time. Our results suggest that, at the time of memory assessment, rats remember when a recent episode occurred, similar to human episodic memory.

Full-text preview

Available from: pnas.org
  • Source
    • "Roberts, Abroms, Kit, & Crupi, 2003; McKenzie, Bird, & Roberts, 2005) and many more recent successes (e.g., Babb & Crystal, 2005, 2006a, 2006b; Ferkin, Combs, delBarco-Trillo, Pierce, & Franklin, 2008; Naqshbandi, Feeney, McKenzie, & Roberts, 2007; Zhou & Crystal, 2009, 2011). Researchers have also struggled to find a bound what-where-when event memory in primates with some failures (e.g., Hampton, Hampstead, & Murray, 2005) and some recent success (e.g., Hoffman, Beran, & Washburn, 2009; Martin-Ordas, Haun, Colmenares, Call, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In an ever-changing world, the ability to track what significant events occur and where and when is beneficial to a variety of animal species. The purpose of the present studies was to assess the presence of this ability to track what-where-when memory in pigeons based both on when during the day the events occurred and how long ago events occurred. In these studies, pigeons were trained to discriminate between two foods that differed in quality (what), making one more "attractive" than the other. The birds were required to alter their choice of keylights (where) to get these differential foods based on the time of day (Experiments 1-2) or how long ago (Experiments 3-5) they were in a session (when). Pigeons were able to correctly choose the key that yielded the "attractive" food using both time of day and how long ago, indicating a what-where-when memory. However, the pigeons failed to transfer this knowledge to a novel situation, showing limited flexibility in use of the learned what-where-when information. These findings suggest that pigeons have abilities to track what-where-when events as do caching birds and other animal species, but perhaps represented in a more rigid manner. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes
  • Source
    • "The criterion for episodic-like memory is that a behavioral response should be based on "what" occurred "where" and "when" during a past experience (Clayton and Dickinson 1998; see also above). What–where–when memory as a form of episodic-like memory was first proposed in an elegant study on Western scrub jays (Clayton and Dickinson 1998) and later in rats (Zhou and Crystal 2009). Although the computational, cellular and neuroanatomical processes underlying spatial memory are often assumed also to control episodic memory (Buzsáki and Moser 2013), none of the traditional tests used in mice and rats assess episodic-like memory (Morris 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The analysis of spatial learning and memory in rodents is commonly used to investigate the mechanisms underlying certain forms of human cognition and to model their dysfunction in neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Proper interpretation of rodent behavior in terms of spatial memory and as a model of human cognitive functions is only possible if various navigation strategies and factors controlling the performance of the animal in a spatial task are taken into consideration. The aim of this review is to describe the experimental approaches that are being used for the study of spatial memory in rats and mice and the way that they can be interpreted in terms of general memory functions. After an introduction to the classification of memory into various categories and respective underlying neuroanatomical substrates, I explain the concept of spatial memory and its measurement in rats and mice by analysis of their navigation strategies. Subsequently, I describe the most common paradigms for spatial memory assessment with specific focus on methodological issues relevant for the correct interpretation of the results in terms of cognitive function. Finally, I present recent advances in the use of spatial memory tasks to investigate episodic-like memory in mice.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2013 · Cell and Tissue Research
    • "Remarkably there is a clear lack of agreement in the way that the temporal component has been operationalized. In some studies when is considered as “in which occasion” [e.g., order of events (Eichenbaum et al., 2005; Eacott and Easton, 2010)], in others defined when is defined as sensitivity to “how long ago” the caching/baiting event took place (Clayton and Dickinson, 1998; Clayton et al., 2003b) and in others “when” is defined as “in which moment” (Roberts et al., 2008; Zhou and Crystal, 2009). In fact, the extent to what remembering “order of events” require the same memory system as remembering “how long ago” is still an open question (Easton et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Historically, episodic memory has been described as autonoetic, personally relevant, complex, context-rich, and allowing mental time travel. In contrast, semantic memory, which is theorized to be free of context and personal relevance, is noetic and consists of general knowledge of facts about the world. The field of comparative psychology has adopted this distinction in order to study episodic memory in non-human animals. Our aim in this article is not only to reflect on the concept of episodic memory and the experimental approaches used in comparative psychology to study this phenomenon, but also to provide a critical analysis of these paradigms. We conclude the article by providing new avenues for future research.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2013 · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Show more