Comparison of Carotid Stents: An In-Vitro Experiment Focusing on Stent Design

ArticleinJournal of Endovascular Therapy 16(2):168-77 · May 2009with27 Reads
Impact Factor: 3.35 · DOI: 10.1583/08-2539.1 · Source: PubMed


    To examine and compare different carotid stent designs with regard to flexibility, adaptability (adjustability), conformability (compliance) to the vessel, and scaffolding to reduce plaque prolapse and embolization.
    Six stents of different design were compared (Precise, Acculink, Protégé, Xact, Wallstent, and Cristallo Ideale). Optical microscopy was used to determine exact dimensions and scaffolding of each stent. Radial force was tested using a parallel plate setup, and flexibility (torsion and bending) was measured in water at body temperature. Particle penetration simulation was performed using plastic spheres from 1.5- to 6.0-mm outer diameter.
    Stent dimensions met the manufacturers' data; none of the products showed any failure during the test program. Cell sizes in the middle part of the stents ranged from 1.36 mm(2) (Wallstent) to 15.10 mm(2) (Acculink). Bending forces at 20 degrees /30 degrees ranged from 0.063 N / 0.074 N (Cristallo Ideale) to 0.890 N / 0.616 N (Xact); forces to achieve torsion at 10 degrees /15 degrees ranged from 0.032 N / 0.043 N (Acculink) to 0.905 N / 1.071 N (Xact). According to the parallel plate method, mean lowest force was measured for Xact (0.765 N), while the Wallstent had the highest force (2.136 N). Mean radial force measurements were lowest for Cristallo Ideale (9.06 N at mid part) and highest for Protégé (24.09 N). The Cristallo Ideale stent at mid part resisted penetration by all but the smallest plastic spheres (1.5-mm spheres penetrated only at 0.65 N); the Precise and Protégé stent had the highest variation in sphere penetration (1.5- to 4.0-mm spheres). Only the Acculink let 6-mm spheres penetrate.
    Despite comparable stent sizes, these carotid stents showed differences in behavior due to stent design. The open-cell design displayed the greatest flexibility and adaptability to the vessel but easily allowed particle penetration due to the open structure. Closed-cell designs had low flexibility and thus low adaptability to the vessel but high resistance to particle penetration due to the closed-cell design and high scaffolding. The hybrid stent design (Cristallo Ideale) was able to combine both the flexibility of an open-cell structure and the resistance to particle penetration of closed-cell structures.