Article

Twenty-year outcome for individuals with autism and average or near-average cognitive abilities. Autism Research, 2(2), 109-118

Utah Autism Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 650 Komas Dr., Ste. 206, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Autism Research (Impact Factor: 4.33). 04/2009; 2(2):109-18. DOI: 10.1002/aur.69
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Previous studies found substantial variability in adult outcome for people with autism whose cognitive functioning was within the near-average and average ranges. This study examined adult outcome for 41 such individuals (38 men and 3 women) originally identified through an epidemiological survey of autism in Utah. Mean age at the time of their previous cognitive assessment was 7.2 years (SD=4.1, range=3.1-25.9 years) and at follow-up was 32.5 years (SD=5.7 years, range=22.3-46.4 years). Outcome measures included standardized assessments of diagnostic status, cognitive ability, and adaptive behavior. Additional information collected concerned demographic variables, indicators of independence, social relationships, medical and psychiatric conditions, and social service use. Outcomes for this sample were better than outcomes described in previous work on individuals with similar cognitive functioning. For example, half of the participants were rated as "Very Good" or "Good" on a global outcome measure. As in previous studies, there was considerable variability in measured cognitive ability over time. Over half of the sample had large gains or losses of cognitive ability of greater than 1 standard deviation. Cognitive gain was associated with better outcome, as was better adaptive functioning. While all participants had baseline IQs in the nonimpaired range, there was limited evidence to support the use of other early childhood variables to predict adult outcome.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: William R Jenson
    • "Review publications have often cited cognition/intelligence quotient (IQ) as the most common and important predictor of outcomes (Levy and Perry 2011; Seltzer et al. 2004). Increases in IQ, as well as the lack of a co-morbid intellectual disability diagnosis, have been found to positively predict employment outcomes (*Chiang et al. 2013; Howlin et al. 2004; *Liptak et al. 2011), friendships (Howlin et al. 2004), daily living independence (Gillespie- Lynch et al. 2012), and overall outcomes (Farley et al. 2009; Howlin et al. 2013). However, Howlin et al. (2004) suggested that there may be a maximum IQ (i.e., 100) for which this relationship holds, and Gillespie-Lynch et al. (2012) suggested that malleability of cognitive status (i.e., change over time) may be more relevant than early scores. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding the complex relationships among factors that may predict the outcomes of young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is of utmost importance given the increasing population undergoing and anticipating the transition to adulthood. With a sample of youth with ASD (n = 1170) from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, structural equation modeling techniques were used to test parent expectations as a mediator of young adult outcomes (i.e., employment, residential independence, social participation) in a longitudinal analysis. The mediation hypothesis was confirmed; family background and functional performance variables significantly predicted parent expectations which significantly predicted outcomes. These findings add context to previous studies examining the role of parent expectations on young adult outcomes and inform directions for family-centered interventions and future research.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2016 · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Source
    • "Significant numbers of people with early diagnoses of ASD make better progress than was originally predicted. The differences in progress cannot be attributed to specific interventions (Farley et al. 2009; Fountain, Winter & Bearman 2012). "
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: Draft MS (part 3) discussing UK ASD research and implications of DSM5, RDoC and the IACC
    Full-text · Research · Oct 2015
  • Source
    • "participation in education, peer relations etc.). Previous studies on societal functioning of individuals diagnosed with ASD in childhood for instance concluded that only a minority of the individuals with ASD attended mainstream schools without special educational needs (SEN) in adolescence (i.e. between 2 and 44 %; Ballaban-Gil et al. 1996; Billstedt et al. 2011; Cederlund et al. 2008; Farley et al. 2009; Howlin et al. 2004, 2013). Knowledge on the societal functioning of this group might contribute to more optimally tailored services for these individuals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current 7-year follow-up study investigated: (1) the stability of ASD severity, and (2) associations of ASD severity in adolescence with (a) childhood and concurrent psychiatric comorbidity, and (b) concurrent societal functioning. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children were administered in childhood (ages 6-12) and in adolescence (ages 12-20) to 72 individuals with a pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). ADOS calibrated severity scores showed a large stability (r = .51). Psychiatric comorbidity in childhood and adolescence were not associated with ASD severity in adolescence. Mental health care use (87 %) and special education needs were high (71 %). Reevaluation of ASD severity and psychiatric comorbidity later in life seem useful when PDD-NOS is diagnosed in childhood.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015 · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Show more