ArticleLiterature Review

Hearing Impairment in 2008: A compilation of available epidemiological studies

Taylor & Francis
International Journal of Audiology
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

A data bank of prevalence of hearing impairment for monitoring and implementation of programmes at national or global level and for the estimate of the global burden has been established. A systematic search was conducted of random-sample population-based studies of bilateral hearing impairment with clearly defined hearing threshold levels. Fifty-three studies from 31 countries from all WHO regions were found to meet the selection criteria. The prevalence of mild and disabling hearing impairment and other details from the studies are reported by WHO region. Although a large number of studies were found, only a small number among them were suitable surveys of prevalence of bilateral hearing impairment in the general population. Hearing impairment is a major disability that should be monitored at all ages: more population-based surveys are needed in all regions of the world. Utilization of the WHO protocol is recommended for collection and analysis of data in standard ways; especially recommended is the use of WHO threshold levels and to report the prevalence of bilateral impairment, both of which required to calculate burden.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... A hearing threshold of ≤25 dB nHL indicated normal hearing. A better ear hearing threshold of >30 dB nHL was defined as disabling HI, according to the WHO definition [18,19]. If a patient did not hear the stimulus at 80 dB nHL, an estimated value of 81 dB was used. ...
... However, using a cut-off of 40 dB, HI was more common in patients' than controls' ears (20/100 vs. 1/38, p = 0.008). Similarly, using a cut-off of 60 dB, having severe or profound HI was significantly more common in patients' vs. controls' ears (18/100 vs. 0/38, p = 0.003), and profound HI of ears was more common with patients compared to controls (14/100 vs. 0/42, p = 0.01), as seen in Table 2. [18,19]. The diagnosed ear pathologies in patients were as follows: 1 perforated ear with normal hearing, 1 ear with effusion and normal hearing, and 1 ear with otorrhoea and profound HI. ...
... Estimated hearing grades (ASSR and ABR) of children having survived bacterial meningitis and controls in Luanda, Angola. Hearing grades refer to WHO hearing loss grades: ≤25 dB nHL normal hearing; 26-40 dB nHL mild HI; 41-60 dB nHL moderate HI; 61-80 dB nHL severe HI; >80 dB nHL profound HI[18,19]. p values obtained with Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate; significance with p < 0.05. ...
Article
Full-text available
Survivors of childhood bacterial meningitis (BM) often develop hearing impairment (HI). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), BM continues to be a significant cause of hearing disability. We assessed hearing among BM survivors using auditory steady-state responses (ASSR), providing frequency-specific estimated audiograms, and examined whether ASSR would provide a greater understanding of BM-induced HI. Survivors from two prospective BM trials (ISRCTN62824827; NCT01540838) from Luanda Children’s Hospital were examined in a follow-up visit with a median duration of 26 months after BM. The hearing of 50 BM survivors and 19 control children was evaluated using ASSR and auditory brainstem response (ABR) after interview and neurological and otorhinolaryngological examinations. The median age of survivors was 80 (IQR 86) months. We diagnosed HI (better ear hearing ≥ 26 dB) in 9/50 (18%) children. Five of the fifty survivors (10%) and 14/100 ears (14%) had profound HI (>80 dB). Severe-to-profound HI affected all frequencies steadily, affecting only the ears of BM survivors (18/100 vs. 0/38, p = 0.003). When looking only at the severely or profoundly affected ears, young age, low Glascow coma score, pneumococcal aetiology, and ataxia were associated with a worse hearing outcome.
... All of which may not reflect the true picture, while a few are communitybased but were studies done among children only in the highly metropolitan city of Lagos [7,8]. However, Pascolini and Smith published a compilation of epidemiological studies, in which estimates of hearing loss prevalence following the Ear and Hearing disorders survey protocol for Nigeria was 6.2% from their target population [9]. ...
... During the WHO 2000 survey for hearing loss estimates, it was reported that prevalence of hearing impairment in the Southern African region of Madagascar was as high as 29.9% [9]. Hearing impairment varies in many regions of the world according to age, sex, causation and availability of appropriate health care. ...
... The protocol involved conducting a hearing impairment/Ear diseases survey from a randomly-selected community, for all participants above 5years of age. Consenting consecutive subjects were tested for hearing loss, by audiometry, and then examined for the presence of other ear diseases (via otoscopy) and to diagnose the cause of the hearing loss [9]. ...
... In a large questionnaire screening in rural Eastern Ethiopia hearing loss was identified as the most frequent childhood disability accompanied in half by recurrent ear discharge as a result of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM). 2 Different published school studies describe the prevalence of hearing loss ranging between 5 to 10% in the sub-Saharan region. 3 Variability in cut-off levels, varia-tions in the screening protocols and the hearing frequencies tested likely accounted for some of these diferences. The true prevalence of hearing loss in low-income countries likely exceeds that in high income countries where the prevalence of hearing loss is in the 2 to 4 % range using a cut-off of 25 dB HL. ...
... The prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss varies between 1-2% for the Sub-Saharan continent, but some studies reported far higher prevalences. 1,3,5 Today, in most low-and middle-income countries (LMIC's) school screening is not part of integrated school health policies. This is the case in most Sub-Saharan African nations, including Ethiopia. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of hearing loss in children attending primary schools in urban and rural Ethiopia. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed to determine the prevalence of hearing loss in children aged 7 to 14 years. A total of 384 children had complete examinations and were included in the study. Results The prevalence of hearing loss of all types in the urban school was 6.2% using a cut-off of 40 dB Fletcher index (500–2000 Hz). The prevalence increased to 10.2 % in the same population if a cut-off of 25 dB HL FI was used. In the rural school with a cut-off of 30 dB HL the hearing prevalence was 5.9%. The proportion of conductive hearing loss was lower in the urban school and constituted 16% of all hearing losses. We estimated the proportion of conductive hearing loss in the rural school to be at least 50%. In the urban school the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss was 5.8% while it was much lower at 1.3% and exclusively unilateral in the rural school. The degree of hearing loss according to WHO criteria was calculated only for the urban population. A prevalence of bilateral severe hearing loss (≥61 dB HL) of 0.5% and of moderate hearing loss (> 41 dB and ≤60dB HL) of 1% was found using WHO criteria. The prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media and of dry perforations were similar between schools (2.5 to 2.7%). Otitis media was rare in this study likely due to seasonal influences and exclusion of very young children. These results are compared to similar school studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusions The prevalence of hearing loss in these two Ethiopian cohorts (rural and urban) is in agreement with the data published by WHO for Sub-Saharan Africa. While some of the variation between urban and rural populations may have been real, some of the discrepancy may have resulted from differences in acoustic testing environments. We describe these challenges in hopes of improving universal screening procedures.
... Among the world's disabled people, hearing loss ranks as the fourth-highest disability [1]. A World Health Organization (WHO) report indicates that currently, there are over 1.5 billion people in the world living with hearing loss, and this figure represents about 20% of the entire world's population. ...
... A World Health Organization (WHO) report indicates that currently, there are over 1.5 billion people in the world living with hearing loss, and this figure represents about 20% of the entire world's population. In addition to the predictions revealed in this report, it is predicted that by 2050 there will be a total of more than 700 million people with hearing loss [1,2]. In South Asia, approximately 131.67 million people are suffering from hearing loss which is roughly 7.37 percent of its entire population [2]. ...
Article
Hearing loss detection using automated audiometers and artificial intelligence methods has gained increasing attention in recent years. The proposed work aims: (a) to design an automated audiometer to diagnose hearing ability and to evaluate hearing intensity for healthy and profound hearing loss patients within 250 Hz to 8 kHz, (b) to compare the proposed automated audiometer with a conventional audiometer when estimating auditory perception level using pure tone and speech audiometers, and (c) to use the machine learning algorithms to classify hearing loss and normal subjects based on the selected features extracted from speech signals. Participants in the study included 50 healthy individuals and 50 patients with profound hearing loss. In the proposed hardware unit, the transmitted pure-tone signal and the speech signal stimulus are controlled automatically instead of being controlled manually. Using a digital potentiometer, a pure-tone audiometer can be automatically calibrated by varying the frequency and intensity of the generated tones according to the users’ responses. During speech audiometric measurements, pre-recorded speech and repeated speech signals are analyzed to estimate speech recognition threshold (SRT) and word recognition score (WRS). The designed audiometer plots the audiogram automatically, estimating SRT and WRS, and classifying the subject as normal or hearing impaired. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using Machine Learning to predict hearing impairment in patients. A support vector machine, a random forest, and an AdaBoost model produced accuracy rates of 98%, 96%, and 96%, respectively, when identifying normal and hearing loss subjects. The proposed audiometer system is miniaturized, portable, and user-friendly in comparison to conventional audiometers. Consequently, the prototype would make it possible for subjects to conduct their own audiometric tests independently and send the results along with their audiogram to a trained medical professional to receive advice.
... Accurate population data on the prevalence of hearing impairment and the rate of minor, moderate, and severe hearing loss across the age spectrum are very important if public health professionals are to formulate national policies about hearing-loss management. However, to date, there are only a few reports about these details [15,16], most likely because it is time-consuming and difficult to accurately perform appropriate hearing tests on a large population of subjects. ...
... Nonetheless, to ensure that patients with those kinds of hearing losses were not included in our present analyses, we excluded patients who had a left-right ear hearing-threshold differences of ≥15 dB at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz and had an air-bone gap of >10 dB. Patient audiometric and demographic data were obtained from electronic medical records, as described earlier [16]. If a patient underwent pure-tone audiometry multiple times, the mean age at each test and mean hearing threshold for each frequency were used. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Accurate data on the prevalence of hearing impairment and severity across age and gender are paramount to formulate hearing health policies. Here, we sought to analyze audiometric data from a large group of age-diverse people in Japan, which has not been previously described in detail. Methods: We analyzed retrospective hearing threshold data of 23,860 participants (10-99 years; left-right hearing threshold difference <15 dB; air-bone gap ≤10 dB) at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, and then classified them for hearing impairment severity according to the WHO Classification. Findings: There was a significant gender difference in median hearing thresholds, starting in 20-year-olds up to early 80-year-olds. Twenty-five percent of men in their late 50s had some level of HI, ~50% in their late 60s, and ~75% in their late 70s. For women, 25% had some level of HI in their early 60s, ~50% in their early 70s, and ~75% in their late 70s. For participants in their early 80s, 50% of either gender had moderate or more severe HI. Interpretation: Our results, derived from a large number of participants, provide basic information about the prevalence of hearing loss by age decade. Since people can expect to live longer than those in previous generations, our detailed data can inform national social systems responsible for hearing screening in making decisions about hearing-aid qualification, which may reduce barriers to older people's independence, productivity, and quality of life.
... A comprehensive review from 2009 found only six studies reporting hearing loss applicable to the European region. 11 None of these studies were from Germany, even though Germany accounts for more than one-tenth of the European population. The WHO Programme for the Prevention of Blindness and Deafness and Hearing Impairment initiated a central database for hearing impairment. ...
... They stated important criteria for studies to be eligible: Studies must have a randomly selected sample, they must be population based, and they must be representative for a country or a subregion. 11 Furthermore, to make results comparable, studies must report standardized outcome measures. ...
Article
Objectives/Hypothesis Hearing loss is the most common sensory impairment worldwide. It restricts patients in many aspects of their daily lives and can lead to social exclusion. Understanding this burden is a mandatory requirement for the care of those affected. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the burden of hearing loss in a large German cohort. Study Design Cohort study. Methods The Gutenberg Health Study is designed as a single-center, prospective, and observational cohort study and representative for the city of Mainz, Germany, with its district. Participants were interviewed concerning common otologic symptoms and tested by pure-tone audiometry. The primary outcome was hearing impairment stratified by age and sex. The prevalence of tinnitus was estimated for a subcohort to calculate disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). All results were weighted by the European Standard Population (ESP) 2013. Results A total of 5,024 participants (mean age: 61.2 years, 2,591 men and 2,433 women) were included in the study. Hearing impairment showed the following prevalence: 28.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.9%–29.4%) mild impairment, 10.1% (95% CI, 9.3%–11.0%) moderate impairment, 2.3% (95% CI, 1.9%–2.7%) moderately severe impairment, 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%–0.4%) severe impairment, 0% (95% CI, 0.0%–0.1%) profound impairment, and 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0%–0.2%) complete impairment. Weighted for the ESP 2013 (all ages), hearing impairment across all levels (with/without tinnitus) causes a total of 2,118.97 DALYs per 100,000. Conclusion With 40.9% affected, the hearing loss represents a relevant burden of the German population. Understanding this will provide the basis for future guidelines on how to care for these patients. Level of Evidence 2 Laryngoscope, 2021
... 4 In underdeveloped nations, there are more than 10 newborns born alive with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss for every 1000 live births, according to Pasolini and Smith (2009). 11 As per NSSO survey, currently there are 291 persons per one lakh population who are suffering from severe to profound hearing loss (NSSO, 2001). Of these, a large percentage is children between the ages of 0 to 14 years. ...
... There is also a lack of measures capturing stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors among those who may, often inadvertently, perpetuate stigma, such as the general population or even HCPs. Moreover, most research on populations that are d/DHH has occurred in high-income settings (Pascolini & Smith 2009;Stevens et al. 2013;West et al. 2021), while more than 80% of people who are d/DHH reside in LMICs (West et al. 2021; World Health Organization 2021). As such, there is still a need for the development of a set of comprehensive measures to capture the breadth of different types of d/DHH stigma among diverse populations with different lived experiences and in varying socioeconomic and cultural contexts. ...
Article
People who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/DHH) often experience stigma and discrimination in their daily lives. Qualitative research describing their lived experiences has provided useful, in-depth insights into the pervasiveness of stigma. Quantitative measures could facilitate further investigation of the scope of this phenomenon. Thus, under the auspices of the Lancet Commission on Hearing Loss, we developed and preliminarily validated survey measures of different types of stigma related to d/Deafness and hearing loss in the United States (a high-income country) and Ghana (a lower-middle income country). In this introductory article, we first present working definitions of the different types of stigma; an overview of what is known about stigma in the context of hearing loss; and the motivation underlying the development of measures that capture different types of stigma from the perspectives of different key groups. We then describe the mixed-methods exploratory sequential approach used to develop the stigma measures for several key groups: people who are d/DHH, parents of children who are d/DHH, care partners of people who are d/DHH, healthcare providers, and the general population. The subsequent manuscripts in this special supplement of Ear and Hearing describe the psychometric validation of the various stigma scales developed using these methods.
... 7,8 To adequately address the treatment and prevention of hearing loss in LMICs, public health systems must first understand the prevalence of the disability and its causes so they can identify appropriate treatment and prevention programs that will benefit the largest number of people in the most effective manner. Past investigations into the prevalence of global hearing loss have included meta-analyses of samples from birth through adulthood 7,19 or children under 1 year old. 20 An analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study also included participants of all ages. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim To summarize the literature on the prevalence of pediatric hearing loss in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Method A systematic review initially identified 2833 studies, of which 122 met the criteria for inclusion. Eighty‐six of those studies included diagnoses and were included in a meta‐analysis. Results The meta‐analysis indicated a 1% (95% confidence interval = 0.8–2.0) prevalence of childhood hearing loss across LMICs. There was significant heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias. The prevalence of mild and moderate cases of hearing loss was higher than more severe cases and there were fewer cases of mixed hearing loss compared to conductive or sensorineural hearing loss. No differences were identified between the prevalence of unilateral versus bilateral hearing loss or hearing loss according to sex. The quality of the studies, age of participants, and location of data collection may have influenced the results. High variability in the reporting of etiology made the causes of hearing loss unclear. Interpretation The literature indicates that 1% of children in LMICs have hearing losses. However, most studies missed children with acquired hearing loss, which may lead to under‐reporting of global prevalence. This systematic review is an initial step toward developing and implementing population‐appropriate treatment and prevention programs for childhood hearing loss in LMICs. What this paper adds The prevalence of childhood hearing loss in low‐ and middle‐income countries is 1%. Reporting of hearing loss etiology was highly variable.
... For example, it is estimated that around 100 million people are exposed to harmful traffic noise levels, over 55 decibels (dB), in Europe 12 . Surveys conducted in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India and Burma with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO) between 1997 and 2001 found that 8% to 24% of all age groups suffered from hearing impairment 13 . Moreover, exposure to noise pollution entails adverse, accumulative and direct effects on human health, such as auditory loss, sleep disturbance, and cardiovascular and psycho-physiological problems 5,[14][15][16][17] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Sound or noise pollution has become a pressing issue in the major cities of the world. The rapidly growing and densely populated Kathmandu city in Nepal is no exception. Traffic noise level data were recorded in the field using sound-level meters. Each observation session was for 3 h (8-11 am) and (3-6 pm) at an interval of 10 sec on working days. The vehicle flow status was studied by direct observation, while the time series of noise pollution data and vehicles registered were updated from secondary sources. Further, various noise descriptors like traffic noise level, noise pollution level, equivalent continuous sound level (Leq), minimum sound level and maximum sound level were determined to assess noise pollution. It was found that there was no significant difference in the descriptors between the morning and evening traffic flow periods at a 5% level of significance. At all the 20 studied road junctions, Leq exceeded 70 dB(A) surpassing the recommended levels of national as well as international noise standards. If the present noise pollution level persists in Kathmandu with the growing population and number of vehicles, it will increase the chances of adverse health effects on the population .
... Its incidence is 1:1500 live newborns (LNB); also, the hearing loss is hereditary in 1:1000 LNB and may appear as congenital sensorineural hearing loss that may affect up to 1-3% of individuals in some populations [1][2][3][4] . According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 5,6 , hearing loss is classified into four groups based on its severity: mild (hearing threshold between 26-40 dB HL); moderate (hearing threshold between 41-60 dB HL); severe (hearing threshold between 61-80 dB HL); profound (hearing threshold > 80 dB HL). Since 2008, a new classification of hearing loss has been proposed by a group of experts belonging to the Global Burden Organization 7 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Hearing loss is the most frequent sensory disorder, with an incidence of 1:1500 live newborns. In more than 50% of patients, it is associated with a genetic cause, while in up to 30% of cases, it is related to syndromic entities. We performed a literature review of studies on congenital hearing loss of genetic origin in the Mexican population. We identified eight reports that showed that the pathogenic variants most frequently associated with hearing loss are related to the GJB2 gene, although in a low percentage (3%). Other mutations were identified in the GJB6, SLC26A4, or CHD23 genes. On this basis, a possible diagnostic strategy in Mexican patients with hearing loss is to consider an initial screening of these three genes. If these genes were negative for pathogenic variants, the following steps would be to consider second-generation sequencing analysis focused on panels of genes associated with hearing loss, isolated or syndromic, and if necessary, to perform exome or whole-genome analysis. Establishing an etiologic cause is critical in clinically evaluating patients with congenital hearing loss and their families. It can help determine rehabilitation strategies, such as hearing aids or cochlear implants and provide information on disease progression and genetic counseling in this population.
... 5 However, 80% of deaf and hearing-impaired people live in low-to middleincome countries, 50% of which are avoidable through prevention, early diagnosis, and management. 4,6,7 In the adult population, studies confirmed that HL starts at about 40 years old, and increases progressively over the years, although there is a resemblance in the audiology configuration, men are affected earlier and more intensely than women. The hearing system affection may cause psychosocial effects, like low self-esteem, isolation, depression, and irritability, which can interfere with the quality of life of the individuals. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Hearing loss (HL) has negative impact on quality of life. The prevalence of HL increases with age. Aims and Objectives: The present study was planned to explore the possible association of hypertension with age-related sensorineural HL (SNHL) in the elderly. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in the ENT Department of Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam. Consecutive sampling method used. Sample size was considered using the formula – 4pq/l2 and 137 subjects from age group 60–75 years were included in the study. Hypertension was verified through a mercury sphygmomanometer and by a systematized questionnaire about hypertension and the use of medication for blood pressure. The hearing was assessed through threshold audiometric and audiological assessment. The study period: 4 months. All patients from the ENT department in the age group 60–75 years and who gave written informed consent were involved in the study. Participants with a history of ear surgery performed in the past, exposure to loud sounds, recently use of ototoxic drugs, patients with hearing aids, and ear diseases were excluded from the study. Results: Out of 137 subjects 52% had hypertension and 48% had no hypertension. Grade 1 hypertensives suffered from mild HL (7.9%), moderate HL (73%), severe HL (11%), and profound HL (7.9%). In Grade 2, hypertensives suffered from moderate HL (11%), severe HL (33.3%), and profound HL (55.5%). The P-value calculated by the Chi-square method was found to be
... [16][17][18] These limitations were highlighted in the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study 1 and in several other studies. [19][20][21] Although some nationally representative studies have reported audiometric data on subsamples, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 22,23 representative studies of large sample sizes are lacking in the field, notably in Europe. For instance, in France, the latest estimation of hearing loss prevalence was performed in 2008 and relied on selfreported answers, with estimates of hearing loss ranging from 8.5% to 16.1% depending on the question. ...
Article
Full-text available
Importance: Although hearing loss is common in the population worldwide, the prevalence of hearing loss and hearing aid use is not known. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of hearing loss and hearing aid use in the adult French population. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used data from the CONSTANCES cohort, a representative sample of the French population. Volunteers aged 18 to 75 years were recruited at 21 preventive health centers between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. The present study included participants with audiometric data. Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were prevalence of hearing loss and disabling hearing loss overall and by sex and age group and prevalence of self-reported hearing aid use among those with disabling hearing loss. Hearing loss was defined as a pure-tone average (PTA) in the better ear of 20 dB or higher, and disabling hearing loss was defined as a PTA in the better ear of 35 dB or higher. Results: Of 200 870 participants in the CONSTANCES study, 186 460 had full audiometric data and were included in this study (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [13.5] years); 100 330 (53.8%) were female, and 86 130 (46.2%) were male. Of these participants, 24.8% (95% CI, 24.6%-25.0%) had hearing loss and 4.3% (95% CI, 4.2%-4.4%) had disabling hearing loss. The prevalence rates of hearing loss increased from 3.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-3.9%) at age 18 to 25 years to 73.3% (95% CI, 69.5%-77.2%) at age 71 to 75 years among men and from 4.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-5.0%) at age 18 to 25 years to 64.1% (95% CI, 59.7%-68.4%) at age 71 to 75 years among women. The prevalence of disabling hearing loss increased from 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.4%) among participants aged 18 to 25 years to 23.3% (95% CI, 20.7%-26.0%) among participants aged 71 to 75 years. Among the 8050 participants with disabling hearing loss, 36.8% (95% CI, 35.8%-37.9%) reported using hearing aids, including 56.7% (95% CI, 38.9%-74.4%) aged 18 to 25 years and 32.9% (95% CI, 26.8%-39.2%) aged 71 to 75 years. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, hearing loss was prevalent in France, and the prevalence of hearing loss increased with age among both men and women. Hearing aids were underused, particularly among older individuals. These findings suggest that hearing loss prevention and screening in the French population are needed.
... The population's age demographics are used in all countries to inform hearing loss prevalence estimates and inform each country's hearing health policy. The global estimates of hearing loss prevalence are currently calculated from a compilation of fifty-three epidemiological studies from 31 countries-only three analysed audiological data from nationally representative samples (Pascolini and Smith 2009). The findings from our study have the realistic potential to encourage many researchers internationally to investigate whether there are regional differences in the hearing loss prevalence among adults with similar age profiles in other countries. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: We aimed to update the prevalence estimates of hearing loss in older adults in England using a nationally representative sample of adults aged 50 years old and older. Design: A comparative cross-sectional study design was implemented. Hearing loss was defined as ≥35 dB HL at 3.0 kHz, as measured via Hearcheck in the better-hearing ear. Study sample: We compared the estimates based on the English census in 2015 to estimates from psychoacoustic hearing data available for 8,263 participants in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) Wave 7 (2014-2015). Results: Marked regional variability in hearing loss prevalence was revealed among participants with similar age profiles. The regional differences in hearing outcomes reached up to 13.53% in those belonging to the 71-80 years old group; the prevalence of hearing loss was 49.22% in the North East of England (95%CI 48.0-50.4), versus 35.69% in the South East (95%CI 34.8-36.50). Conclusion: A socio-spatial approach in planning sustainable models of hearing care based on the actual populations' needs and not on age demographics might offer a viable opportunity for healthier lives. Regular assessment of the extent and causality of the population's different audiological needs within the country is strongly supported.
... The Census of India (2011) reports that hearing impairment affects about 5.07 million and 1.98 million of the populations with various types of speech problems almost uniformly distributed around the country [7]. Pascolini and Smith reported bilateral severe to profound hearing loss affect more than 10 infants in every 1000 live births in developing countries [8]. Niskar et al. found 14.9% of children with either low-frequency or high-frequency hearing loss in a hospital-based survey [9]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background It is estimated that about 15% of students have transient hearing loss worldwide sufficient enough to interfere with communication, psychosocial relationship, and learning resulting in poor educational achievement and poverty. However, these conditions are reversible through timely detection and effective interventions. India is home to the largest number of school age children with hearing impairment, and majority of them remain undetected and untreated due to the absence of any dedicated hearing screening program. Therefore, this paper attempts to convince all stakeholders for planning and implementing early detection and intervention program for children with hearing impairment in school settings. Methods Recent literature estimates that children between the ages 0 and 14 years contribute 25.9% of the total Indian population. As per the global estimates of the prevalence of hearing impairment, India houses the largest number of school age children with hearing impairment. Many of them either remain out of school or perform poorly in school curriculum. Results The children in educational programs are readily and easily available for applying hearing screening procedures to detect hearing impairment and instituting audiological and educational remedial measures. But unfortunately, India has not yet envisaged any dedicated early detection and intervention program for school-going children consequently majority of children with hearing impairment undetected and untreated in the classroom. Conclusion Hearing impairment is a serious health concern among school age children which can adversely impact on communication, educational achievement, and vocational options. However, screening approaches for early identification in school age children across the world which are simple, effective, and cost-efficient can be considered for countries like India to reverse the ill effects of hearing impairment. Potential implication The paper may heighten the awareness among school personnel, educational administrators, and policymakers to consider planning and implementation of early detection and intervention program for children with hearing impairment in school settings.
... Niskar et al. 1998 found 14.9% of children with either low frequency or high frequency hearing loss in a hospital-based survey [23]. Pascolini & Smith (2008) reported that bilateral severe to profound hearing loss affect more than 10 infants in every 1000 live births in developing countries [24]. ...
Article
Hearing impairment is most frequent sensory deficit present in infants at birth and unaddressed hearing impairment causes severe damages to both infants and their families. In India 77,756 live children are born per day which accounts for about 25 million children annually among them approximately 1.5 lacs (@ 6 per1000) children born with hearing impairment. These children have no prospects of early identification & intervention. As a result, majority of these children suffers from oral communication difficulties, poor academic performance, reduced psychosocial & cognitive development, socioeconomic insufficiency, deprived vocational opportunities & employability. However, consequences of hearing impairment are ameliorable if timely hearing screening and effective intervention strategies are instituted. Unfortunately, India has not yet envisaged any dedicated early identification and intervention program for children with hearing impairment. However, there are ample of opportunities for implementing such program. Hence, this paper endeavours to address the necessity to plan and to implement the early identification of hearing impairment by discussing burden of disorder, suggesting means to overcome the challenges and to explore and emphasize the opportunities of purposeful utilization of available infrastructure and resources. This paper also intends to suggest a conceptual framework for planning and implementing of National Infant Screening for Hearing Program to deal with serious consequences of hearing impairment in India.
... Hearing impairment is a neglected public health problem in developing countries [21], even though about half of all cases of hearing impairment are avoidable through prevention, early diagnosis, and management [22,23]. The large burden of hypertension in Africa may contribute to the huge burden of hearing impairment in the region. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The inner ear vascular system may be disrupted by systemic hypertension causing inner ear hemorrhage and resulting in progressive or sudden hearing loss. Constriction of the labyrinthine artery secondary to atherosclerosis seen in high BMI and waist/hip circumference—risk factors of hypertension—could also occur with resultant hearing loss. Thus, hypertension could predispose to increased risk of hearing loss. This cross-sectional study assessed the hearing thresholds of hypertensive patients and sought to determine the association between hypertension and hearing loss among patients attending cardiology clinic in tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Results The study population was 500 individuals equally divided into subject and control arms. The mean age of the subjects and controls was 47.2 ± 7.4 years and 46.9 ± 7.5 years respectively. Hearing loss—mainly mild sensorineural hearing loss—was seen in 30% of the subjects and 0.4% of the controls. The hearing loss was bilateral in all subjects and slightly worse in the right ears. The hearing loss worsened with increased age, severity, and duration of hypertension; however, there was no association between the hearing loss and body mass index. Conclusion There is an association between hypertension and hearing loss, though most of the hypertensive subjects had mild sensorineural hearing loss. The prevalence and severity of the hearing loss worsens with the degree of hypertension. Incorporating regular audiological assessment for hypertensive patients could improve the quality of care for hypertension and quality of life for hypertensive patients.
... While much of the research on hearing loss has been conducted in high-income countries, far less has been conducted in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although research does exist, the number and quality of these studies varies across regions (Pascolini and Smith 2009;Stevens et al. 2013). The WHO (2021b) estimates that 80% of people worldwide with moderate or greater hearing loss reside in LMICs. ...
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability. Methods We did systematic reviews of population-representative surveys on hearing loss prevalence from 1990 to 2019. We fitted nested meta-regression models for severity-specific prevalence, accounting for hearing aid coverage, cause, and the presence of tinnitus. We also forecasted the prevalence of hearing loss until 2050. Findings An estimated 1·57 billion (95% uncertainty interval 1·51–1·64) people globally had hearing loss in 2019, accounting for one in five people (20·3% [19·5–21·1]). Of these, 403·3 million (357·3–449·5) people had hearing loss that was moderate or higher in severity after adjusting for hearing aid use, and 430·4 million (381·7–479·6) without adjustment. The largest number of people with moderate-to-complete hearing loss resided in the Western Pacific region (127·1 million people [112·3–142·6]). Of all people with a hearing impairment, 62·1% (60·2–63·9) were older than 50 years. The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index explained 65·8% of the variation in national age-standardised rates of years lived with disability, because countries with a low HAQ Index had higher rates of years lived with disability. By 2050, a projected 2·45 billion (2·35–2·56) people will have hearing loss, a 56·1% (47·3–65·2) increase from 2019, despite stable age-standardised prevalence. Interpretation As populations age, the number of people with hearing loss will increase. Interventions such as childhood screening, hearing aids, effective management of otitis media and meningitis, and cochlear implants have the potential to ameliorate this burden. Because the burden of moderate-to-complete hearing loss is concentrated in countries with low health-care quality and access, stronger health-care provision mechanisms are needed to reduce the burden of unaddressed hearing loss in these settings.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability. Methods We did systematic reviews of population-representative surveys on hearing loss prevalence from 1990 to 2019. We fitted nested meta-regression models for severity-specific prevalence, accounting for hearing aid coverage, cause, and the presence of tinnitus. We also forecasted the prevalence of hearing loss until 2050. Findings An estimated 1·57 billion (95% uncertainty interval 1·51–1·64) people globally had hearing loss in 2019, accounting for one in five people (20·3% [19·5–21·1]). Of these, 403·3 million (357·3–449·5) people had hearing loss that was moderate or higher in severity after adjusting for hearing aid use, and 430·4 million (381·7–479·6) without adjustment. The largest number of people with moderate-to-complete hearing loss resided in the Western Pacific region (127·1 million people [112·3–142·6]). Of all people with a hearing impairment, 62·1% (60·2–63·9) were older than 50 years. The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index explained 65·8% of the variation in national age-standardised rates of years lived with disability, because countries with a low HAQ Index had higher rates of years lived with disability. By 2050, a projected 2·45 billion (2·35–2·56) people will have hearing loss, a 56·1% (47·3–65·2) increase from 2019, despite stable age-standardised prevalence. Interpretation As populations age, the number of people with hearing loss will increase. Interventions such as childhood screening, hearing aids, effective management of otitis media and meningitis, and cochlear implants have the potential to ameliorate this burden. Because the burden of moderate-to-complete hearing loss is concentrated in countries with low health-care quality and access, stronger health-care provision mechanisms are needed to reduce the burden of unaddressed hearing loss in these settings. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and WHO.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Vahit YİĞİT Vahit YİĞİT Associate Professor, Suleyman Demirel University, Department of Healthcare Management. GBD Collaborator, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. View full profile Feed post Vahit YİĞİTStatus is online Vahit YİĞİT Associate Professor, Suleyman Demirel University, Department of Healthcare Management. GBD Collaborator, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. 1d • Edited • 1 day ago İşitme kaybı; bilinci, gelişimi ve sosyal refahı olumsuz yönde etkileyebilen bir durumdur. Küresel Hastalık Yükü çalışmamıza göre 2019'da dünya genelinde tahmini 1, 5 milyar kişi işitme kaybı yaşamış olup başka bir ifadeyle dünyada beş kişiden biri işitme problemi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sağlık Hizmetlerine Erişim ve Kalite (HAQ) Endeksi düşük olan ülkelerin daha yüksek işitme kaybı yaygınlığına sahiptir. 2050 yılına kadar işitme engelli kişi sayısı 2.5 milyar olacağı tahmin edilmektedir. Nüfus yaşlandıkça, işitme kaybı olan kişilerin sayısı artacaktır. Çocukluk çağı taraması, işitme cihazları, otitis media ve menenjitin etkili yönetimi ile koklear implantlar gibi müdahaleler bu yükü hafifletme potansiyeline sahiptir. Sağlık hizmeti kalitesi ve erişimi düşük ülkelerde, işitme kaybının yükünü azaltmak için daha güçlü sağlık hizmeti sunum mekanizmalarına ihtiyaç vardır.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability. Methods We did systematic reviews of population-representative surveys on hearing loss prevalence from 1990 to 2019. We fitted nested meta-regression models for severity-specific prevalence, accounting for hearing aid coverage, cause, and the presence of tinnitus. We also forecasted the prevalence of hearing loss until 2050. Findings An estimated 1·57 billion (95% uncertainty interval 1·51–1·64) people globally had hearing loss in 2019, accounting for one in five people (20·3% [19·5–21·1]). Of these, 403·3 million (357·3–449·5) people had hearing loss that was moderate or higher in severity after adjusting for hearing aid use, and 430·4 million (381·7–479·6) without adjustment. The largest number of people with moderate-to-complete hearing loss resided in the Western Pacific region (127·1 million people [112·3–142·6]). Of all people with a hearing impairment, 62·1% (60·2–63·9) were older than 50 years. The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index explained 65·8% of the variation in national age-standardised rates of years lived with disability, because countries with a low HAQ Index had higher rates of years lived with disability. By 2050, a projected 2·45 billion (2·35–2·56) people will have hearing loss, a 56·1% (47·3–65·2) increase from 2019, despite stable age-standardised prevalence. Interpretation As populations age, the number of people with hearing loss will increase. Interventions such as childhood screening, hearing aids, effective management of otitis media and meningitis, and cochlear implants have the potential to ameliorate this burden. Because the burden of moderate-to-complete hearing loss is concentrated in countries with low health-care quality and access, stronger health-care provision mechanisms are needed to reduce the burden of unaddressed hearing loss in these settings.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition’s associated disability. MethodsWe did systematic reviews of population-representative surveys on hearing loss prevalence from 1990 to 2019. We fitted nested meta-regression models for severity-specific prevalence, accounting for hearing aid coverage, cause, and the presence of tinnitus. We also forecasted the prevalence of hearing loss until 2050. Findings An estimated 1·57 billion (95% uncertainty interval 1·51–1·64) people globally had hearing loss in 2019, accounting for one in five people (20·3% [19·5–21·1]). Of these, 403·3 million (357·3–449·5) people had hearing loss that was moderate or higher in severity after adjusting for hearing aid use, and 430·4 million (381·7–479·6) without adjustment. The largest number of people with moderate-to-complete hearing loss resided in the Western Pacific region (127·1 million people [112·3–142·6]). Of all people with a hearing impairment, 62·1% (60·2–63·9) were older than 50 years. The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index explained 65·8% of the variation in national agestandardised rates of years lived with disability, because countries with a low HAQ Index had higher rates of years lived with disability. By 2050, a projected 2·45 billion (2·35–2·56) people will have hearing loss, a 56·1% (47·3–65·2) increase from 2019, despite stable age-standardised prevalence. Interpretation As populations age, the number of people with hearing loss will increase. Interventions such as childhood screening, hearing aids, effective management of otitis media and meningitis, and cochlear implants have the potential to ameliorate this burden. Because the burden of moderate-to-complete hearing loss is concentrated in countries with low health-care quality and access, stronger health-care provision mechanisms are needed to reduce the burden of unaddressed hearing loss in these settings.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability.
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
... We used input data obtained via systematic reviews of epidemiological, populationrepresentative surveys. Sources up to Nov 26, 2008, were obtained via a published system atic review, 19 and two additional systematic reviews done in 2013 and 2016 identified newer sources (appendix p 3). Sources were excluded that recorded selfreported hearing loss, were not populationrepresentative, did not report bilateral (better ear) hearing loss, or did not use puretone audiometry to quantify hearing loss. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Hearing loss affects access to spoken language, which can affect cognition and development, and can negatively affect social wellbeing. We present updated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study on the prevalence of hearing loss in 2019, as well as the condition's associated disability. Methods We did systematic reviews of population-representative surveys on hearing loss prevalence from 1990 to 2019. We fitted nested meta-regression models for severity-specific prevalence, accounting for hearing aid coverage, cause, and the presence of tinnitus. We also forecasted the prevalence of hearing loss until 2050. Findings An estimated 1·57 billion (95% uncertainty interval 1·51–1·64) people globally had hearing loss in 2019, accounting for one in five people (20·3% [19·5–21·1]). Of these, 403·3 million (357·3–449·5) people had hearing loss that was moderate or higher in severity after adjusting for hearing aid use, and 430·4 million (381·7–479·6) without adjustment. The largest number of people with moderate-to-complete hearing loss resided in the Western Pacific region (127·1 million people [112·3–142·6]). Of all people with a hearing impairment, 62·1% (60·2–63·9) were older than 50 years. The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index explained 65·8% of the variation in national age-standardised rates of years lived with disability, because countries with a low HAQ Index had higher rates of years lived with disability. By 2050, a projected 2·45 billion (2·35–2·56) people will have hearing loss, a 56·1% (47·3–65·2) increase from 2019, despite stable age-standardised prevalence. Interpretation As populations age, the number of people with hearing loss will increase. Interventions such as childhood screening, hearing aids, effective management of otitis media and meningitis, and cochlear implants have the potential to ameliorate this burden. Because the burden of moderate-to-complete hearing loss is concentrated in countries with low health-care quality and access, stronger health-care provision mechanisms are needed to reduce the burden of unaddressed hearing loss in these settings. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and WHO.
... The WHO data are based on the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) project, which has estimated the HL prevalence based on only 42 studies in 29 countries [2]. Among many studies on HL prevalence in the general population, only a small number of surveys are suitable for analysis, and more population-based surveys are needed in all regions of the world [2,3]. For countries with missing or scarce data, the GBD calculates the HL prevalence using a Bayesian hierarchical model that is effective for sparse data [2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The absence of comparable epidemiological data challenges the correct estimation of the prevalence of congenital hearing loss (HL) around the world. Sign language (SL) is known as the main type of communication of deaf people. We suggest that the distribution of SL can be interpreted as an indirect indicator of the prevalence of congenital HL. Since a significant part of congenital HL is due to genetic causes, an assessment of the distribution of SL users can reveal regions with an extensive accumulation of hereditary HL. For the first time, we analyzed the data on the distribution of SL users that became available for the total population of Russia by the 2010 census. Seventy-three out of 85 federal regions of Russia were ranked into three groups by the 25th and 75th percentiles of the proportion of SL users: 14 regions—“low proportion”; 48 regions—“average proportion”; and 11 regions—“high proportion”. We consider that the observed uneven prevalence of SL users can reflect underlying hereditary forms of congenital HL accumulated in certain populations by specific genetic background and population structure. At least, the data from this study indicate that the highest proportions of SL users detected in some Siberian regions are consistent with the reported accumulation of specific hereditary HL forms in indigenous Yakut, Tuvinian and Altaian populations.
... Hypoacusia is a prevalent condition in the population that affects some 360 million people worldwide, resulting in various levels of disability ranging from physical to social and psychological aspects [1]. In particular, hypoacusia could lead to disorders involving speech, resulting in difficulties taking part actively and effectively in conversations in different listening environments, to cognitive impairment, such as dementia, mental health problems, such as anxiety and depression [2][3][4][5], and even to an increased mortality risk [6,7]. There is consensus that depending on its degree or severity, the frequencies affected, and the stage of life in which it appears, hypoacusia can cause severe damage to the development of speech, language, and cognitive abilities, especially if it presents in prelingual children. ...
Article
Full-text available
Hearing loss affects hundreds of millions of people all over the world, leading to several types of disabilities, ranging from purely physical to psychological and/or social aspects. A proper analysis to ascertain the main risk factors is essential in order to diagnose early and treat adequately. An exploratory analysis based on a heterogeneous sample of 1418 workers is presented in order to identify the main trigger factors for hearing loss. On the one hand, we recorded several medical and environmental parameters, and on the other, we created a model based on Bayesian networks in order to be able to infer the probability of hearing loss considering different scenarios. This paper focuses on three parameters: gender, age, and a family history of hearing problems. The results obtained allow us to infer or predict the best or worst auditory level for an individual under several different scenarios. The least relevant factor is the existence of a family history of deafness, followed by the gender factor, which slopes considerably toward better hearing for females, and most prominent of all, the age factor, given the large differences identified between the various age groups when the gender and family history of deafness variables remain constant. View Full-Text
... Critérios de seleção e exclusão dos estudos O procedimento para a seleção dos estudos ocorreu por meio da busca eletrônica, com a utilização de critérios de inclusão dos artigos referentes ao foco das perguntas de pesquisa, não tendo sido delimitado o idioma. Foram aceitos estudos publicados a partir dos anos de 1990 até dezembro de 2019; na busca bibliográfica identificou-se que houve um estudo epidemiológico de audição no início dos anos 80 que incluiu artigos publicados até 2008, em revisão similar abordando a deficiência auditiva [39]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objetivo: buscar a avaliação crítica e a síntese das evidências disponíveis sobre a relação entre o zumbido, o estresse e os níveis de zinco em alunos e trabalhadores docentes e não docentes de Instituições de Ensino Superior. Materiais e métodos: Realizou-se um levantamento bibliográfico em bases eletrônicas de dados (Lilacs, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cinhal, Academic Search Premier, Science Direct), com busca bibliográfica padronizada, utilizando-se palavras-chave e descritores específicos procurando todos os resumos de estudos pertinentes à questão proposta. Foram estabelecidos critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Dos títulos obtidos buscou-se selecionar aqueles que tivessem, pelo menos, um dos elementos da tríade: zumbido, estresse e níveis de zinco. Após a leitura dos textos completos, estes foram resenhados de acordo com ficha protocolar e obtidos quatro estudos incluídos na Revisão Integrativa. Resultados: Tornou-se evidente que o ruído pode causar zumbido e gerar queixas e sintomas na audição e, também, na saúde em geral. Em nenhum dos estudos foi identificado que o zinco demonstrasse uma possível associação com o zumbido no organismo, assim como com o estresse. Conclusão: Faltam estudos para que se consiga comprovar uma melhor evidência na literatura sobre a existência de relação entre a tríade zumbido, estresse e níveis de zinco na população pesquisada.
... The rate of congenital severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss in Nicaragua is much higher than in developed countries, with an estimated school-age prevalence of 1.6 to 7.2 per 1,000 compared with 1 to 3 per 1,000 in developed countries (e.g., Olusanya & Newton, 2007;Pascolini & Smith, 2009). A survey of national disabilities in Nicaragua indicated that 12% of those with disabilities had a hearing loss (Saunders et al., 2015). ...
Article
This case study described the oral expressive outcomes of five children with hearing loss who experienced prolonged auditory deprivation prior to participating in an auditory intervention. Expressive outcomes were measured by the number of spontaneous words and imitations. Visual analyses revealed that two of the five participants increased their oral expressive skills during the intervention. The results suggest that children with hearing loss who are late identified and aided can still develop some basic oral expressive skills, but they would probably benefit from interventions that directly target the use of words expressively.
... Hearing loss was diagnosed when the hearing threshold in either ear at any frequency between 0.25-8 kilohertz (kHz) was worse than 25 decibel hearing level (dBHL) in audiometry assessment. 14 All types of permanent hearing loss were included, namely conductive hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss and mixed hearing loss. Pure tone averages (PTA) of 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz were used to define the degree of hearing loss, which were mild (26-40 dBHL), moderate (41-55 dBHL), moderately severe (56-70 dBHL), severe (71-90 dBHL) and profound (>90 dBHL). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To assess the health utility scores of Thais with hearing loss, which can be used as a reference value for assessing health-related quality of life and economic evaluations in any interventions among hearing-impaired persons in Thailand. Material and Methods: All hearing-impaired persons who visited Songklanagarind Hospital between January and June 2019 were recruited for the study. The demographic and clinical data of the participants including gender, age, and type and degree of hearing loss were collected. A health-related quality of life interview was conducted using the EuroQoL five-dimensional questionnaire, Thai version. Independent t-test and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to assess which factors were associated independently with the health utility scores. Results: One hundred and eleven participants, 46 males and 65 females, ranging in age from 22 to 92 years, were recruited for the study. The average health utility scores were 0.81 and 0.86 for subjects not using and using hearing aids, respectively, similar to the results from other nations. The average health utility score of subjects with underlying diseases (0.79) was lower than the average health utility score of subjects without underlying diseases (0.87) with statistical significance (p-value=0.038). Additionally, the pure tone average in the better ear was the only variable significantly associated with the health utility scores (regression coefficient: -0.004, p-value=0.002). Conclusion: The average health utility scores among hearing-impaired Thais were 0.81 and 0.86 for subjects not using and using hearing aids, respectively.
... representing a significant global disease burden (Correia et al., 2016;Pascolini & Smith, 2009). Based 42 on animal studies, reduction to an individual's auditory input through HI has the potential to adversely 43 impact sleep, however, whether a causal mechanism exists in humans between sleep disruption and 44 reduced auditory input per se remains an open question. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Hearing impairment (HI) is the most common sensory impairment and may negatively impact sleep through reduced auditory input. Factors associated with HI such as anxiety regarding communication in daily life may also adversely impact an individual's sleep. Here, research on the relationship between HI and sleep disruption was catalogued using scoping review methodology. Method A systematic strategy was employed to search various electronic databases. This review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review Extension. Results Sixteen records met inclusion criteria. Studies have investigated sleep in HI as a primary aim in noise-exposed workers or large surveys in older participants. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies report alterations to sleep architecture of potential neuroplastic origins. Studies reporting sleep as a secondary aim generally report poorer sleep in HI participants. Conclusions This scoping review has catalogued evidence that altered or negatively impacted sleep may be associated with HI. Potential confounding factors, mechanisms, and considerations for future research are discussed. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9968369
Article
Background and Objectives This study aims to analyze trends in hearing disability and the use of hearing rehabilitation devices (hearing aids and cochlear implants) in South Korea over the past 11 years (2010-2020) using data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).Subjects and Method Data were extracted from the NHIS database, covering approximately 97% of the South Korean population. Patients diagnosed with hearing loss were classified using ICD-10 codes. The data were analyzed to determine trends in hearing disability, hearing aid prescriptions, and cochlear implant usage by age, gender, and types and causes of hearing loss.Results The number of hearing disability patients increased from 170900 in 2010 to 362738 in 2020, with an annual growth rate of 7.95%. The highest increase was observed in the ≥60 age group, with an annual growth rate of 11.04%. Hearing aid prescriptions rose from 4966 in 2010 to 11974 in 2020, showing a 10.45% annual increase. Females showed a higher growth rate in both hearing disability and hearing aid prescriptions compared to males. Cochlear implant prescriptions also increased, particularly among older adults.Conclusion The study highlights a significant rise in hearing disability and the use of hearing aids and cochlear implants in South Korea, especially among the elderly. The findings underscore the importance of early diagnosis and intervention for hearing loss and the need for policy improvements to enhance accessibility and affordability of hearing rehabilitation services. Additional strategies are needed to ensure appropriate hearing rehabilitation for those not yet receiving adequate care.
Article
In this special supplement of Ear and Hearing , we have presented preliminarily validated measures for stigma related to being d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/DHH) in the United States and Ghana. In this concluding article, we suggest avenues for the future refinement and use of these measures. First, the measures should be further validated. Second, they should be used to assess the current state of d/DHH stigma and the importance of different kinds of stigma in different populations, which should in turn drive the development of interventions to reduce d/DHH stigma. Third, these measures can assist in evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of those interventions. The evidence from this work can then inform investment cases and cost-of-condition studies, which will support advocacy efforts and policy development for reducing stigma and improving the lives of people who are d/DHH.
Article
Hearing impairment is one of the most prevalent disorder in children and adults worldwide, which not only interferes with the acquisition, development and maintenance of speech and language skills but also adversely deprive the auditory nervous system for future learning. It can have long term harmful effect on educational, social, emotional and cognitive skills in young children; restrict the vocational options and employment opportunities in adults; and can cause isolation, loneliness and depression in older adults, if remain undetected and intervened at the earliest. However, early identification and intervention is known to greatly reverse the ill effects and improve the quality of life of children and adults with hearing impairment. Current clinical means and methods to identify and intervene hearing loss are convenient, cost effective, reasonably accurate beneficial and evidenced based, can be easily employed nation-wide for early identification and intervention of hearing loss. This paper attempts to convince medical colleagues, public health care experts and policy makers by justifying the hearing, as public health issue and relevance of medical screening criteria for hearing. It also discusses the preferred model of hearing screening and intervention strategies in India.
Thesis
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 1. Hintergrund und Ziele Seit fast einer Dekade ist der Oldenburger Kinder-Satztest (OlKiSa) am Cochlear-Implant-Centrum der Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik Erlangen als audiometrischer Test zur Bestimmung des Sprachverstehens bei Kindern mit Cochlea-Implantat (CI) etabliert. Studien zur OlKiSa-Leistung CI-versorgter Kinder gibt es bisher kaum. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist die retrospektive Analyse des Sprachverstehens im OlKiSa bei hörgeschädigten Kindern nach der Versorgung mit Cochlea-Implantaten. Hierbei sollen die Sprachverständnis-Leistungen der Cochlea-Implantat-versorgten Kinder dargestellt werden, sowie der Einfluss des Versorgungsalters der Patienten auf deren Testergebnisse geprüft werden. Ergänzend werden unter anderem die Einflussfaktoren Migrationshintergrund und Komorbidität analysiert. 2. Methoden Es wurden 64 Kinder untersucht, die vor dem sechsten Lebensjahr mit einem Cochlea-Implantat versorgt wurden. Sie wurden im Laufe der Jahre 2010 bis 2019 im Cochlear-Implant-Centrum Erlangen ambulant therapiert. Ihre Sprachverstehensleistung wurde mittels OlKiSa gemessen. Die Messbedingungen des OlKiSa sind unterteilt nach: adaptive Freifeld-Messung im Störgeräusch (Adaptiv), nicht-adaptive Freifeld-Messung im Störgeräusch (Störfix) und nicht-adaptive Freifeld-Messung in Ruhe (In Ruhe). Es fanden Auswertungen zur Verteilung des Patientenalters und des Höralters zu den Messzeitpunkten statt. Die gesamten OlKiSa-Leistungen wurden miteinander verglichen und zum Teil unter dem Einfluss von Komorbidität und Migrationshintergrund geprüft. Des Weiteren wurde der Einfluss des Versorgungsalters auf die OlKiSa-Leistungen ermittelt. Außerdem wurden die Messbedingungen Adaptiv und Störfix auf Sensibilität miteinander verglichen. 9 3. Ergebnisse und Beobachtungen Es kamen verschiedene Messbedingungen in unterschiedlichen Altersklassen zur Anwendung. OlKiSa-Tests im Störgeräusch wurden im Mittel 1⁄2 ‒ 11⁄4 Jahre später absolviert als der Test in Ruhe. Dies spiegelt die höhere Schwierigkeit des Verstehens im Störgeräusch bei CI-versorgten Kindern wider. Die OlKiSa- Leistungen waren sehr unterschiedlich und weit gestreut. Im Vergleich zu anderen Studien resultierte ein etwas schlechterer Mittelwert. Neben der unterschiedlichen Anzahl an Messungen hing dies bei näherer Betrachtung auch mit den Variablen Komorbidität und Migrationshintergrund zusammen. Insgesamt lagen die Mittelwerte für die OlKiSa-Leistungen In Ruhe bei 78,55 % Sprachverstehen, für die nicht-adaptive Messung im Störgeräusch Störfix je nach Messsituation zwischen 73,41 bis 77,77 % Sprachverstehen und die Sprachverständnisschwelle bei der Adaptiven Messung im Störgeräusch (L50) bei einem Mittelwert von -0,05 bis -0,56 dB SNR. Korrelationsberechnungen zeigten, dass Patienten mit Komorbidität schlechtere (-7 Prozentpunkte im Sprachverstehen) und Patienten mit Migrationshintergrund sogar signifikant schlechtere Werte erzielten (-18 Prozentpunkte im Sprachverstehen, p- Wert = 0,015). Bezüglich der Zusammenhänge zwischen CI-Versorgungsalter und OlKiSa-Leistungen konnte man bei 60 Messungen in Ruhe signifikant bestätigen (p-Wert = 0,0485), dass spätversorgte Kinder bei einem Korrelationswert von rho = -0,256 schlechtere Sprachverstehensleistungen zeigten als frühversorgte. Der Vergleich der nicht-adaptiven Störfix Messung und der Adaptiven Messung zeigte, dass ein gutes Abschneiden im nicht- adaptiven Test nicht mit einem guten Abschneiden im adaptiven Test gleichzusetzen ist. 4. Schlussfolgerungen Diese Studie zeigt, dass frühversorgte Kinder mit einem Cochlea-Implantat zumeist ein besseres Sprachverstehen erwerben als spätversorgte. Dies bestätigt die klinische Empfehlung, die CI-Versorgung hörgeschädigter Kinder möglichst frühzeitig durchzuführen. 10 Um im Alltag beste Ergebnisse für diese Kinder zu erzielen, wären regelmäßige Tests vor allem im Störgeräusch und ein regelmäßiges Anpassen der Cochlea-Implantate ratsam. Weitere Studien sollten Patienten mit Komorbiditäten und Migrationshintergrund separat untersuchen, da in den jeweiligen Vergleichsgruppen doch erhebliche Leistungsunterschiede zu erkennen waren. Gegebenenfalls wären Tests abhängig von der Kondition des Patienten oder in der jeweiligen Muttersprache sinnvoll. Für zukünftige Studien wäre zudem eine detaillierte vergleichende Betrachtung der Tests im Störgeräusch (Adaptiv und Störfix) empfehlenswert. Von Interesse ist hierbei, unter welchen Umständen der adaptive Test dem nicht-adaptiven Test überlegen ist und umgekehrt.
Article
This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hearing loss in the Philippines using a nationally representative sample. A cross-sectional national survey was undertaken utilizing a 3-stage stratified cluster design. Participants in the present study comprised 2275 adults and children with pure tone hearing assessment results. Prevalence of moderate or worse hearing loss, defined as 4FA ≥41 dBHL, was 7.5% in children <18 years, 14.7% in adults between 18 and 65 years, and 49.1% in adults >65 years. Factors associated with greater risk of moderate hearing loss in the better ear were presence of a middle ear condition (adjusted odds ratio = 2.39, 95% confidence interval = 1.49-3.85) and socioeconomic status (household income; adjusted odds ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.23-2.19). Age was also associated with increased risk, with adjusted odds ratios varying with age category. Prevalence of wax occlusion and outer and middle ear disease was 12.2% and 14.2%, respectively. Prevalence of hearing loss, outer, and middle ear disease appear comparatively high in the Philippines when compared with rates reported in high-income countries. Higher proportions of severe to profound hearing loss were also identified, indicating that there is both an increased prevalence and severity of hearing loss in this population.
Article
Introduction: As the human lifespan rises, older people are increasingly affected by multimorbidity, including hearing impairment (HI), frailty, and cognitive decline. Objective: We studied the effect of HI on the cognitive performance of older patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia and how this effect is altered when HI and frailty coexist. Methods: The sample comprised 172 outpatients (age ≥65 years) with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5-1 and a Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥20. Cognitive, neuropsychological, physical function tests, and body measurements were performed. The participants' comorbidity indices were calculated, and they were asked to report their hearing condition. Finally, the participants were divided into 4 groups based on the presence of frailty, HI, both conditions, or neither. Results: The presence of HI was significantly associated with a lower Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) score (unadjusted model: p = 0.003; adjusted: p = 0.012). Moreover, people with both HI and frailty were more likely to have a low DSST score than those in the other groups (unadjusted model: OR: 3.741, 95% CI: 1.374-10.183, p = 0.010; adjusted model: OR: 4.192, 95% CI: 1.026-17.136, p = 0.046). Conclusions: This study highlights the negative relationship between cognitive performance scored on the DSST and the presence of HI. Furthermore, the presence of both frailty and HI is associated with a worse cognitive score than HI alone.
Article
Objective: (1) To test the feasibility of the Rapid Assessment of Hearing Loss (RAHL) survey protocol in Malawi (Ntcheu); (2) To estimate the prevalence and probable causes of hearing loss (adults 50+). Design: Cross-sectional population-based survey. Study sample: Clusters (n = 38) were selected using probability-proportionate-to-size-sampling. Within each cluster, 30 people aged 50+ were selected using compact-segment-sampling. All participants completed smartphone-based audiometry (hearTest). Prevalence was estimated using WHO definitions (PTA of thresholds 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz in the better ear of >25 dB HL (any) and >40 dB HL (≥moderate)). Otoscopy and questionnaire were used to assess probable causes. Participants with hearing loss and/or ear disease were asked about care-seeking and barriers. Results: Four teams completed the survey in 24 days. 1080 of 1153 (93.7%) participants were examined. The median time to complete the protocol was 24 min/participant. Prevalence of hearing loss was 35.9% (95% CI = 31.6–40.2) (any level); and 10.0% (95% CI = 7.9–12.5) (≥moderate). The majority was classified as probable sensorineural. Nearly one third of people (30.9%) needed diagnostic audiology services and possible hearing aid fitting. Hearing aid coverage was <1%. Lack of perceived need was a key barrier. Conclusion: The RAHL is simple, fast and provides information about the magnitude and probable causes of hearing loss to plan services.
Article
Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate audiologic findings according to mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) subtypes and to estimate hearing changes as the disease progressed, as well as the therapeutic effect of enzyme replacement therapy on the hearing apparatus. Methods: A total of 124 patients who were diagnosed with MPS between September 1994 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Play audiometry or pure-tone audiometry was performed for hearing assessment, and auditory brainstem response was conducted in patients with poor compliance. Results: In total 124 patients were identified, ranging in age at diagnosis from 0 to 33 years. Fourteen of the patients had been diagnosed with type I, while 91 had type II, 2 had type III, 14 had type IV, and 3 had type VI. Mean bone conduction and air conduction for the better ear were 26.13±16.95 dB and 34.77 ± 20.00 dB in all patients, and 34.20±7.64 dB and 40.70±9.67 dB in patients with MPS II. The average auditory brainstem response threshold was 68.96 ±21.93 dB nHL. The most common type of hearing loss was pure sensorineural hearing loss in all subtypes, and the degree of hearing loss was variable mostly within the mild to severe range. The increase in the hearing threshold was also significantly correlated with the disease duration. However, the change in hearing level was not correlated with the duration of enzyme replacement therapy. Conclusions: Hearing impairment in MPS patients is common and is aggravated as the disease progresses. Thus, adequate intervention and hearing rehabilitation might play an important role in managing hearing disabilities in MPS patients.
Article
Full-text available
Referring to specific types of hearing loss as "minimal" or "mild" seems to imply that their effects are equally mild or negligible. A growing body of literature, however, supports the notion that such losses can have a significant impact on the communicative and educational development of young children. Although OME is considered a common childhood ailment, mounting evidence suggests that it is not always benign and may contribute to significant educational and communicative difficulties in some young children when accompanied by conductive hearing loss. Even very mild bilateral and unilateral SNHL seems to contribute to problems in the areas of social and emotional function, educational achievement, and communication in some children. Because these hearing losses are so mild, they may not be immediately recognized as the source of such difficulties. The purpose of this report is to heighten the general pediatrician's awareness of the significance of even very mild or minimal hearing losses in children. As the gatekeepers for children's health care, pediatricians are typically the primary recipients of parental expressions of concern and the initiators of evaluations or referrals to address such.
Technical Report
Introduction In 1993 the World Bank sponsored a study to assess the global burden of disease in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Harvard School of Public Health (1-3). As well as generating comprehensive and consistent set of estimates of mortality and morbidity by age, sex and region for the world for the first time (4-6), the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study also introduced a new metric – the disability adjusted life year (DALY) – to quantify the burden of disease. The DALY is a summary measure of population health that combines in a single indicator years of life lost from premature death and years of life lived with disabilities. One DALY can be thought of as one lost year of ‘healthy’ life and the burden of disease as a measurement of the gap between current health status and an ideal situation where everyone lives into old age free of disease and disability. In recent years, considerable international effort has been put into the development of summary measures of population health that combine information on mortality and non-fatal health outcomes into a single measure. International policy interest in such indicators is increasing
Personal Communication
  • C Mathers
  • C Mathers
Report of the Informal Working Group on Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment Programme Planning
  • World Health Organization
  • World Health Organization
Future Programme Developments for the Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment. Report of the First Informal Consultation
  • World Health Organization
  • World Health Organization
Population estimates and projections: 2004 revision
  • United Nations Population Division
  • United Nations Population Division
WHO ear and hearing disorders survey protocol for a population-based survey of prevalence and causes of deafness and hearing impairment and other ear disorders
  • World Health Organization
  • World Health Organization
WHO calls on private sector to provide affordable hearing aids in developing world
  • World Health Organization
  • World Health Organization
Global Burden of Disease in 2002: data sources, methods and results. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No. 54. Geneva, World Health Organization
  • C D Mathers
  • C Bernard
  • Moesgaard
  • K Iburg
  • M Inoue
  • Fat D Ma