... But these techniques have a significant problem in terms of disposal of the precipitated wastes (Ozdemir, Karatas, Dursun, Argun & Dogan, 2005;Meunier, Drogui, Montane, Hausler, Mercier & Blais, 2006). The sedimentation (Song, Williams & Edyvean, 2000), electrochemical processes (Oda & Nakagawa, 2003), biological operations (Kapoora, Viraraghavana & Cullimoreb, 1999), cementation (Filibeli, Buyukkamaci & Senol, 2000), coagulation/flocculation (Song, Williams & Edyvean, 2004), filtration and membrane processes (Hafez, El-Manharawy & Khedr, 2002), chemical precipitation and solvent extraction (Macchi, Pagano, Pettine, Santrori & Tiravanti, 1991) are also used. Some of the low cost, non-conventional adsorbents include anaerobic sludge (Ulmanu, Marañón, Fernández, Castrillón, Anger & Dumitriu, 2003), apple residue (Lee, Jung, Chung, Lee & Yang, 1998), sawdust (Shukla, 2005), rice Polish (Singh, Rastogi & Hasan, 2005), clay (Farrah, & Pickering, 1977), zeolite (El-Kamash, Zaki & El Geleel, 2005), fly ash (Al-Qodah, 2006), chitosan (Jha, Iyengar & Rao, 1988), waste tea (Orhan & Büyükgüngör, 1993;Ahluwalia & Goyal, 2005), seaweeds (Da Costa & De França, 1996), polyaniline coated on sawdust (Mansour, Ossman & Farag, 2011), and Carica papaya plant (Sheikh, Apon & Hashem, 2017) which have been used for the purpose, but all these attempts have become inefficient because of the less available nature of adsorbent. ...