State Variations In The Out-Of-Pocket Spending Burden For Outpatient Mental Health Treatment

Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, in Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.97). 05/2009; 28(3):713-22. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.713
Source: PubMed


We examine the potential of mental health/substance abuse (MH/SA) parity laws to reduce the out-of-pocket spending burden for outpatient treatment at the state level by exploring cross-state variations and their causes, as well as the provisions of MH/SA parity laws. We find modest (yet important) variation in out-of-pocket burden across states overall, but-because prescription medications account for two-thirds of out-of-pocket spending and are generally beyond the scope of recently enacted federal parity laws-evidence suggests that those laws will do little to reduce the observed burden or its variation. Other policy measures, designed to expand and improve health insurance coverage or reduce racial/ethnic disparities, could have a more profound impact.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Interest in and familiarity with an issue can often help to foster understanding and decrease misperceptions and stereotypes (Corrigan et al. 2001b; Zuvekas and Meyerhoefer 2009). In contrast, lack of familiarity can lead to stigma and can affect help-seeking and disclosure of MH/SA problems and subsequently lower recognition of the prevalence of MH/SA disorders among the general population. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insurance coverage for mental health services has historically lagged behind other types of health services. We used a simulation exercise in which groups of laypersons deliberate about healthcare tradeoffs. Groups deciding for their "community" were more likely to select mental health coverage than individuals. Individual prioritization of mental health coverage, however, increased after group discussion. Participants discussed: value, cost and perceived need for mental health coverage, moral hazard and community benefit. A deliberative exercise in priority-setting led a significant proportion of persons to reconsider decisions about coverage for mental health services. Deliberations illustrated public-spiritedness, stigma and significant polarity of views.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2011 · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although recognition and treatment of mental health disorders have become integrated into routine medical care, inequities remain regarding limits on mental health outpatient visits and higher copayments and deductibles required for mental health services when accessed. Two federal laws were passed by Congress in 2008: The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act. Both laws became effective on January 1, 2010. The purpose of this article is to discuss provisions of each act and provide clinical examples describing how patients are affected by lack of parity and may potentially benefit from implementation of these new laws. Using available evidence, we examine the potential strengths and limitations of mental health parity legislation from the health policy perspectives of health care access, cost, and quality and identify the important role of nurses as patient and mental health parity advocates.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2010 · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regardless of the outcome of current efforts at healthcare reform, the resources that academic health centers need-to provide care for increasingly complex patient populations, support clinical innovation, grow the clinical enterprise, and carry out their research and teaching missions-are in jeopardy. This article examines the value proposition for psychiatry. The authors describe areas where academic departments of psychiatry have opportunities to help shape the future of academic health centers in a rapidly-changing healthcare environment and share their experience in leadership roles in academic psychiatry and in consulting to academic health center leaders. Many academic health centers are reexamining both their mission and their use of available resources. Some are questioning their ability to sustain traditionally low-margin clinical specialties like internal medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry, where, all too often, clinical revenues alone are insufficient to cover the full cost of caring for the patients they serve. Academic departments of psychiatry must continually demonstrate their value to the academic health centers' clinical and academic mission.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2011 · Academic Psychiatry
Show more